| 4/5/2008 12:42:26 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
If a photo hasn't been posted in two weeks of signing up with DateHookup.dating,it should be put into a "No Photo site" and they should not be allowed on photo sites until they post a photo....The people from the photo site can go to the "no photo site" but not vice versa...plus, they should not be allowed to participate in any discussions without a photo.....Zoe1
[Edited 4/5/2008 7:55:19 PM]
|
| 4/7/2008 6:48:23 AM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
winesong
Bend, OR
age: 88
|
That is an interesting point of view...
thanks for sharing your ideas..
Wine
|
| 4/9/2008 12:06:45 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
slainte08
Mohawk, NY
age: 65
|
and what purpose does this accompolish?????? and what is the reason, because you want a photo, or is there another reason.....
|
| 4/9/2008 6:25:30 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
Well, I suppose we could compare this to a nudist colony ( of which I am not a member )but if everyone is nude and then suddenly a person with clothing is walking around, the person is out of the membership and a bit rather of an odd ball.....As far as photos on Datehookup....Why is it fair for the non-photo person to screen all the photo people, this is out of balance.....and that is why we need a "no photo site".....
|
| 4/12/2008 12:44:07 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
windspirit1
Thomson, GA
age: 66
|
Yes, definitely. In my opinion they refuse to post photos for the following reasons. They are ashamed of what they look like, they don't want friends to know they are on a dating site or they are married
|
| 4/12/2008 3:42:57 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
Windspirit1......Very good observation.....Thanks
|
| 4/12/2008 10:49:05 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
windspirit1
Thomson, GA
age: 66
|
Don't mention it Zoe...I honestly feel that those that don't post a photo are actually reluctant for the afore stated reasons...Hell, I don't like to admit that I'm 66 but it's a fact I've got to live with but my powder aint wet yet so I accept what is and try to make the best of it. Not posting a photo doesn't change the inevitable. When you meet someone...WHOOP...There it is.
|
| 4/13/2008 3:33:35 AM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
border2border
Oshkosh, WI
age: 68
|
well...I look at it like this! I do not post a photo. why? because I am not on display! I am not selling my image but rather who I am and what I believe in. If you check my profile you will see I offer a photo when asked for it or a photo will get a photo. Nothing to hide here.If a photo were required why is it an option? because it's a choice!
|
| 4/13/2008 6:44:56 AM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
For "border2border"......What's good for the goose is good for the gander....Since you feel so strongly about this issue you can be granted #1 on the "no photo site"...Most Sincerely Zoe....
[Edited 4/13/2008 6:50:17 AM]
|
| 4/13/2008 6:54:50 AM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
For Windspirit1.......Don't worry about the "66" you are very handsome and smart and I'm sure you will remain in that condition for a long time.....Zoe1
|
| 4/14/2008 4:00:43 AM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
windspirit1
Thomson, GA
age: 66
|
Hi Zoe....Thanks for the compliment....Do you suppose B to B realizes that most ladies exercise their choice not to view a profile without a pic.
|
| 4/14/2008 6:47:12 AM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
Windspirit1, you are right on!!....
|
| 4/14/2008 12:48:00 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
Check it out!!!.....By Gosh...Oshkosh........B 2 B...See!, That didn't hurt....Now all the girls will be knocking down your door.....You're not #1 on the "no photo site" anymore but that's OK, better a plethhora of girls than that position.... Zoe1
|
| 4/15/2008 11:17:46 AM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
1pinkstar
Omaha, NE
age: 54
|
Sure, it means they don't want anyone to recognize them. Or they are liars posting with different names.
Not too funny and can be dangerous.
[Edited 4/15/2008 11:20:41 AM]
|
| 4/15/2008 2:59:37 PM |
Should people with no photos,have their own site"no photo site" |
|
zoe1
Vernon Hills, IL
age: 67
|
Thanks 1pinkstar......You are Right!!!!
|