You didn't mention the third possibility of the states telling the federal government to f**k off, get back to the constitutionality of your business and we will do our business.

Since this is historical, hard to determine what will happen.

But off topic for this thread, if you asked in my thread I apologize. I usually abandon my threads when it becomes a free for all. There is no more moderators on DH so it is a futile attempt at best.

My experience on DH, for better or worse, is that "defending a position, any position" is the literal equivalent of sticking your finger up your a** and hollerin' snake...



It is IMPOSSIBLE to sway those living elbow deep in denial, even if swaying them is in their own best interests...

Your mileage may vary!

How often do you stick your thumb up your ass, or is it there continuously!

Come here and lick my fingers and find out for yourself!!!



You are still an intellectual midget...

Sophistry???

Do tell...

I think I left DH about a year ago and just like yourself I had hope that things would change...

Unfortunately, the only changes I have seen is things getting progressively WORSE in that year...

I hope you right in your assertion...but the probability seems extremely remote!

Basically, he reminds me of a first year philosophy student who says much without fully comprehending the ramifications of what is being said.

NAprincipal has dreams as we all do..It's just some dreams will never be reality..you have to pay your taxes!

Plenty of people on here will block you if you expose them as pretentious fops , A few liberals have blocked me .

Im surprised that NAprinciple blocked someone long term he usually blocks them for a few days and unblocks them.

I changed policy about 2 months ago, to blocking people who don't bring any value to me

NA,

why did you block class5? he is one of the most intelligent posters on here, I get it if you blocked Boy Wookie.

class 5 can debate with the best of them, I've had a few debates with him and it was great , no ad hominem, no b.s. just good ole fashion debating.

In the end we agree to disagree and moved on, he's okay in my books.

challenge him on 911? I don't know much about 911 except for what reported and when I visit New York seeing ground zero.

I've heard the conspiracies and that isn't my field of expertise , It would be like Hockey player from Canada trying to discuss the rules of "cricket" from Pakistan to someone from Iceland.

You suffer from cognitive dissonance already, don't put too much on your plate





Thinking the biggest violator of private property in the world is necessary in order to protect private property is already too much for you to chew

Darth, he doesn't 'challenge' me on 9/11 at all. He has limited knowledge of the subject and is motivated purely by prejudice, not reason. My interest as a member of the International Skeptics, is to expose lies and scams wherever they appear, and as a result, I became interested in the growth of 9/11 conspiracy theories about 10 years ago, and have studied the subject ever since. Examining Conspiracy theories is the reason I participate in such forums.

NA has all the Conspiracy Theorist rhetoric regarding 9/11 down rote, without a deeper understanding of the subject.

Btw, I appreciate your earlier comments, and I can say the same for you. You debate in a respectful fashion without any need for any mendacity. Something I can't say about the individual in question.