Quote from illuminati_grasshopper:
Cmon fun... lets stay on topic. Why dors every topic have to be about jews and the jew conspiracy?
=========================================

Because it's the anti-gun jewish politicians in Congress that are behind the gun control putsch.

Think that might have anything to do w/ it?

Who do you THINK started the putsch for gun control back in the 60's?

Quote from illuminati_13:
I thought the push started in the 20s or 30s?
===============================================

That's what you get for using wikipedia as a historical "source".

Google "The 1968 Gun Control Act"...see who was behind it.

The 1934 National Firearms Act started it actually since it was the first national firearm restriction to apply to everyone unlike the earlier Jim Crow laws that tried to prevent just blacks from owning firearms.

http://americanhistory.si.edu/brown/history/1-segregated/jim-crow.html
Jim Crow Laws

“It shall be unlawful for a negro and white person to play together or in company with each other in any game of cards or dice, dominoes or checkers.”
—Birmingham, Alabama, 1930


“Marriages are void when one party is a white person and the other is possessed of one-eighth or more negro, Japanese, or Chinese blood.”
—Nebraska, 1911

“Separate free schools shall be established for the education of children of African descent; and it shall be unlawful for any colored child to attend any white school, or any white child to attend a colored school.”
—Missouri, 1929

“All railroads carrying passengers in the state (other than street railroads) shall provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing two or more passenger cars for each passenger train, or by dividing the cars by a partition, so as to secure separate accommodations.”
—Tennessee, 1891

See more Jim Crow laws
Restrictive signs
Restrictive signs

Restrictive signs sprang up across the southern and western landscape. They were constant and humiliating reminders with a common message—“stay in your place.”

See more signs
Signs around the country
Signs around the country
The movement for racial separation reached far beyond the South and targeted many people besides African Americans. White communities across the country erected various kinds of barriers between themselves and other racial and ethnic groups.
Restricted real-estate covenant
Restricted real-estate covenant
In communities across the country, property owners signed agreements called restrictive covenants. These contracts barred African Americans and sometimes other groups-including Jews, Asians, and Latinos-from many neighborhoods. In this covenant from Arlington County, Virginia, in the 1940s, the purchasers agreed never to sell their house to "persons of any race other than the white Caucasian Race."
Photo of Housing development with sign
Housing development with sign

Los Angeles housing development, about 1950
(Courtesy of Southern California Library for Social Studies and Research)

Cmon fun... lets stay on topic. Why dors every topic have to be about jews and the jew conspiracy?



Now back to the topic ...

i have an ar15 and an sks for anyone who tries to take my guns away

according to our anti gunner buddies, the white house needs guns to protect the politicians, but we dont need guns to protect ourselves and our children.

Show me the law that gives the supreme court the power of judicial review.

according to our anti gunner buddies, the white house needs guns to protect the politicians, but we dont need guns to protect ourselves and our children.

according to our anti gunner buddies, the white house needs guns to protect the politicians, but we dont need guns to protect ourselves and our children.

no. just as police officers are authorized to carry a badge and citizens are not assault weapons could be banned to citizens and not law enforcement. laws apply to government and the populous as each law states. police are allowed to exceed the speed limit while giving chace, for instance. and of course laws restricting citizens from optaining nuclear weapons do not apply to the government. nor should they. this is really not that difficult.

A nuclear weapon isn't a firearm dumbass. That is the most ignorant argument that idiots keep using I keep hearing from dip ship liberals.

Hey why not a fighter jet?

Why not a tank?

Why not an aircraft carrier?

Because they aren't firearms nutjob!

Havent we compromised enough? We do background checks. We pay outrageous fees for "nfa" weapons. We go through special training to get access to nfa weapons. We allow you to force us to ask the governments permission to carry a gun. We even pay a fee for that. What more do you people want? Magazine limits? To ban certain rifles? The question we have is; why the hell should we?

As far as the question i asked you jr:
So, you believe the government should have more physical killing power than the people? (In the aspect of firearms)

Should teachers have the option.of carrying a handgun?

Ok fallguy, if you dont want an.all.out ban, what do you want?

There would have to be a specific law in place stating that the government could never under any circumstances confiscate guns for me to be comfortable with registration.

You want to fix straw purchases? Id compromise there by lowering the handgun age to 18.

i remember back in 1992 G. Gordon Liddy denounced "the gun grabbers in Congress"!

the word firearm, gun, pistol, rifle, bazooka, fighter jet, crossbow or any variation of a particulari weapon of any sort is mentioned anywhere in the constitution or any of the amendments.

yes i agree it is a waste of time to discuss guns with some people.

thats why i dont bother talking to you about them