Isa 53:2-5,

2. For before him he grew up like a young plant, like a root out of dry ground. He was not well-formed or especially handsome; we saw him, but his appearance did not attract us. 3. People despised and avoided him, a man of pains, well acquainted with illness. Like someone from whom people turn their faces, he was despised; we did not value him. 4. In fact, it was our diseases he bore, our pains from which he suffered; yet we regarded him as punished, stricken and afflicted by God. 5. But he was wounded because of our crimes, crushed because of our sins; the disciplining that makes us whole fell on him, and by his bruises we are healed.

This is all that is spoken of his 'looks'.

You're confused. Isaiah is the ot. Jesus wouldn't have been born yet so no one would have known what he'd look like. Then again the NT couldn't tell you either because none of the writers were eye witnesses.

OP, Catholics do not have to wonder what Christ looked like, for the Catholic Church HAS the true images of Christ. These come, for example, from the apparitions of Our Lord to the saints, from descriptions of Christ found in the Catholic revelations, revelations that God gave to his Church through the Catholic prophets he sends to his Church over the centuries, and through holy relics such as the images of Christ found on the Shroud of Veronica and on the Shroud of Turin in Italy, the burial shroud of Christ. (It irritates me when the Church commissions artists today for an artist’s rendition of Jesus and Mary, when they have the true images).

Christ was a tall man, as shown on the shroud of Turin, had fair skin, a long nose, blue eyes, auburn colored hair parted in the middle and falling to his shoulders, and a beard with a natural part at the chin, and a mustache that circled down to meet his beard. Note: most Jews have brown eyes, as did his mother Mary, but remember Christ was only half Jew, his Father, God the Father, was not a Jews.

Louie

Jesus looked like this:

This one was taken at the Y...

The first writtin description has christ with long flowing hair, and a few other things that would actually make him caucasion.

"Now let us reason together. Understanding that Ethiopia comes from the Greek word Aithiop, which means "dark skin", let us look at the description of Jesus in Revelation 1:14. "His head and his hairs were whit like wool, as white as snow: and his eyes were as a flame of fire," (which only means they were red), "and his feet like fine brass, as if they were burned in a furnace." (Also see Rev. 1:18).

Any rational minded person would understand that Jesus was not two colors, having a white head and a black or burnt (Aithiop) body. Reasoning will also cause you to understand that his hair is white and wooly, and his body and skin is like the Ethiopians (Dark Skin)."

I figure if he was Jewish (Hebrew) and came from a long line of Jews, then he'd look like the stereotypical Jew, maybe a little darker but have Jewish features. I don't remember him being disscribed as what would be considered handsome.

"If the original Jews were Black, where did white Jews come from?

...European Khazars became “Jews” in 740 A.D."

I figure if he was Jewish (Hebrew) and came from a long line of Jews, then he'd look like the stereotypical Jew, maybe a little darker but have Jewish features. I don't remember him being disscribed as what would be considered handsome.

"If the original Jews were Black, where did white Jews come from?

...European Khazars became “Jews” in 740 A.D."

Except for the genitic fact that they are caucasion, a trait brought with from the middle east. They merged with the Kazars, and overpowered them with genitics.

"It is important to realize that in Old Testament times Egyptians were black, not Arab. Arabs first conquered Egypt when Moslems invaded Egypt shortly after the death of Mohammed."