Sorry, but just because you repeatedly ride the "no planer" hogwash doesn't prove a thing. If you were really trying to spread the truth to both young and old, you would at least address the evidence I presented proving "September Clues" was bunk, the creation of "Loose Change" by Dylan Avery was by his own admission pure fiction, that John Lear is a raving loonatic, and that the use of holograms to the extent that they could display a complete 767 jetliner is simply not possible. .. We are talking about 911. Right?

Once again 57channels... And mind you, if you have the time to post the above over and over again, then I see no problem why you cannot take the time to answer the evidence I posted below.

Before any kind of image could be projected, so as to be visible against the bright blue sky above New York that morning, some method of creating what can only be described as a mid-air ABSENCE OF LIGHT would first have to have been employed to create what is known as a traveling matte into which a 3D plane image would fit so that it didn't look transparent and blue where the skylight seeped through its lighter tones. Adding to that, the light requirement to project such a science fiction "all-over-New York animated hologram, or multiple holograms", would be measured in trillions of lumens. Considering that there is NO evidence that such a system exists, or is ever likely to exist, pretty well dispels all the nonsense regarding your 911 hologram theory.

Please elaborate 57.

That is a great post. I hope he attempts to answer it.

PS.......I'll take the experts opinions about holograms,

When you slam every person who has spoke out about 9-11.........I would think even those sitting on the fence would say " How can a no name nobody continually criticize all the experts who say 9-11 was an inside job??

Sorry, but just because you repeatedly ride the "no planer" hogwash doesn't prove a thing. If you were really trying to spread the truth to both young and old, you would at least address the evidence I presented proving "September Clues" was bunk, the creation of "Loose Change" by Dylan Avery was by his own admission pure fiction, that John Lear is a raving loonatic, and that the use of holograms to the extent that they could display a complete 767 jetliner is simply not possible. .. We are talking about 911. Right?

Once again 57channels... And mind you, if you have the time to post the above over and over again, then I see no problem why you cannot take the time to answer the evidence I posted below.

Before any kind of image could be projected, so as to be visible against the bright blue sky above New York that morning, some method of creating what can only be described as a mid-air ABSENCE OF LIGHT would first have to have been employed to create what is known as a traveling matte into which a 3D plane image would fit so that it didn't look transparent and blue where the skylight seeped through its lighter tones. Adding to that, the light requirement to project such a science fiction "all-over-New York animated hologram, or multiple holograms", would be measured in trillions of lumens. Considering that there is NO evidence that such a system exists, or is ever likely to exist, pretty well dispels all the nonsense regarding your 911 hologram theory.

Please elaborate 57.

Then give us an explanation to what eyewitnesses such as firemen described as "lava pouring down the side of the building" and that same lava is caught on video.

Explain how the nose of a 767 can miraculously stay in tact without being sliced up as if it's going thru a cheese grater as it goes completely thru one of the towers.

Explain how the whole damn plane went inside of each building without atleast a wing or tail section snapping off therefore crashing to the ground. Explain why the only engine claimed to have been from one of the planes found at the foot of the building was NOT the engine from an american airlines 767.

Explain how a plane going 500 miles per hour and crashes into a building but yet there is no wind vortex whatsoever being evident thru the flames and thick smoke.

Explain how flight 93 crashes into the exact crater, the same crater that was already in that field since 1994. Then explain how flight 93 disintegrated upon impact with no visually large pieces visible until 24 hours later when wreckage was found 5 miles away from the original crash site.

Were just getting warmed up non believers so explain away because after you morons answer these questions, i have a whole barrage more of them for you

higgy

So, I ask again. How do you know the witnesses were paid actors? Can you name them for us?
========================================
There are actors or phony witnesses at every false flag attack or govt. inside job. How many were killed speaking out about JFK?? You have to have phony witnesses at every govt. inside job.or average joes would start asking questions and might even get mad?? Common sense