2/15/2014 6:37:04 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
dont worry...be happy!
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
2/15/2014 6:40:48 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
annamally
Santa Clarita, CA
52, joined Feb. 2013
|
oh ho ho more sarcasm. I love it.
Perfect example ... Of a stupid liberal !!
|
2/15/2014 6:43:44 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
batman9816
Lexington, SC
25, joined Sep. 2013
|
Bush was conservative on abortion and taxes, but a liberal on education, health care, border security, foreign aid, immigration, gun control and bank bailouts.
Ted Kennedy worked with Bush on many different topis.
I didn't see why the hell conservatives support the Bush doctrine?
[Edited 2/15/2014 6:44:52 PM ]
|
2/15/2014 6:54:28 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/15/2014 7:03:16 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/15/2014 7:13:00 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
b002013
Chattanooga, TN
65, joined Jul. 2013
|
Proof of the GOP War on Women - PoliticusUSA
www.politicususa.com/proof-war-women-2?
“Democrats didn't make the GOP presidential field back “personhood” laws that would ... in 2012, has taken no less than eight votes against women – in just three months. ... 24 states—-restrict access to abortion services, a striking increase from last year, when .... See the latest update on Porter's antics at Right Wing Watch.
The GOP Takes Its War on Women to the States | People For the ...
www.pfaw.org › Media center › Publications?
People for the American...
Casey, upheld women's constitutional right to abortion services, but allowed certain ... Since then, right-wing politicians have increasingly pushed through state laws meant to ... Some states are even considering legislation that could legalize the ... ultrasound-requirement bill last year only to have it vetoed by then-Governor ...
War on Women - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Women?
Wikipedia
Republicans have tried to turn the phrase against Democrats by using it to ... 1.1.2 Birth control; 1.1.3 Defunding Planned Parenthood; 1.1.4 Defunding ... one that would have changed policy to allow only victims of "forcible rape" or .... legislation banning abortions occurring 20 weeks after a woman's last menstrual period.
Anatomy of the War on Women: How the Koch ... - RH Reality Check
rhrealitycheck.org/.../anatomy-of-the-war-on-women-how-the-koch-brot...?
Nov 5, 2013 - The assault had been years, even decades, in the making. ... and the subsequent census-year victories of right-wing Republicans whose gains ... networks signal disinterest in fighting against women's rights or LGBTQ rights, yet ... Freedom Partners was founded two years later, just in time to help shape the ...
Violence Against Women Act | Right Wing Watch
www.rightwingwatch.org/category/topics/violence-against-women-act?
She lamented that “Republicans are just scared by the feminists” when “they ought to stand ... It was only last year that Concerned Women for America CEO Penny Nance ... even as Congress was working to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act, ... But as the legislation moves to the House, the fight is far from over.
war on women | Right Wing Watch
www.rightwingwatch.org/blog-terms/3956?
Aug 6, 2013 - Twice voted against legislation clarifying that birth control is not a form of abortion. ... Submitted by Miranda Blue on Friday, 4/26/2013 2:18 pm ... Why, then, do we even have to ask, 'Is there a war on women? ... It was only last year that Concerned Women for America CEO Penny Nance criticized the term ...
You have been here long enough to know how to edit your copy and past. Leave some damn white space already. I'll read it when you correct it, other wise it won't get read.
|
2/15/2014 7:17:23 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
b002013
Chattanooga, TN
65, joined Jul. 2013
|
who is the 'stupid' one to assume that we think liberal women 'dont own guns'....?
we are advocates for 2nd ammendment rights for ALL law abiding citizens.
Don't get your panties in a twist, I was referring to the article. There are many who believe that liberal women don't own guns.... I wasn't directing that specifically at you. Funny out of what I said, you chose to b*tch about that.
|
2/15/2014 7:24:35 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
Moronic teabaggers are always harping on about how America is finished, it's destroyed, it's in ruins, blah blah blah.
The day a Republican wins the White House all that shit will disappear as if by magic.
True.
Drones are necessary, unemployment is just lazy bums, and defecits don't matter
Problem is......
We won't see a republican in the white house within the next 40yrs
|
2/15/2014 7:37:31 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
batman9816
Lexington, SC
25, joined Sep. 2013
|
It's hasn't happened yet other than taxes Obama is like Bush or Bush was almost as liberal as him.
They have the same foreign policy and on civil liberties.
|
2/15/2014 7:43:21 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
You have been here long enough to know how to edit your copy and past. Leave some damn white space already. I'll read it when you correct it, other wise it won't get read.
you cant read that???
its not worth my time...you figure it out.
lol...
typical liberal!
they want others to do the for them...UGH!
ya kinda missed the point anyway
[Edited 2/15/2014 7:45:36 PM ]
|
2/15/2014 8:09:16 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
typical liberal!
they want others to do the for them...UGH!
Typical conservative! Can't put a proper sentence together. .. .UGH!
|
2/15/2014 8:17:56 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
batman9816
Lexington, SC
25, joined Sep. 2013
|
Typical conservative! Can't put a proper sentence together. .. .UGH!
If you're almost 50 and a liberal then you're a complete dunce.lol
[Edited 2/15/2014 8:18:17 PM ]
|
2/15/2014 8:20:00 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
If you're almost 50 and a liberal then you're a complete dunce.lol
Au contraire
|
2/15/2014 8:21:11 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
batman9816
Lexington, SC
25, joined Sep. 2013
|
I will never be a liberal been a conservative since 18.
|
2/15/2014 8:22:32 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/15/2014 8:25:30 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
you cant read that???
its not worth my time...you figure it out.
lol...
typical liberal!
they want others to do the work for them...UGH!
ya kinda missed the point anyway
Typical conservative! Can't put a proper sentence together. .. .UGH!
can you read it now
omg...crucify me cuz i was thinking faster than i can type..bfd
[Edited 2/15/2014 8:26:46 PM ]
|
2/15/2014 8:27:24 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
Nice reference
|
2/15/2014 8:33:07 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/15/2014 8:39:16 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
batman9816
Lexington, SC
25, joined Sep. 2013
|
Democrats were more conservative in 1966.lol
Reagan democrats would consider George W. Bush and John McCain too liberal.lol
|
2/15/2014 8:42:22 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
What?
Buffalo?
Have you ever been to buffalo?
|
2/15/2014 8:44:09 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
b002013
Chattanooga, TN
65, joined Jul. 2013
|
you cant read that???
its not worth my time...you figure it out.
lol...
typical liberal!
they want others to do the for them...UGH!
ya kinda missed the point anyway
It's quite evident that it wasn't worth your time.
Typical conservative, does the deed, then blames it on a liberal..
You copied and pasted the material, it's your responsibility to proof read and edit it, not mine. I don't have a problem reading, but I don't waste my time with posts that the author was too lazy to proof read and structure.
|
2/15/2014 8:45:36 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
30, joined Dec. 2012
online now!
|
It's quite evident that it wasn't worth your time.
Typical conservative, does the deed, then blames it on a liberal..
You copied and pasted the material, it's your responsibility to proof read and edit it, not mine. I don't have a problem reading, but I don't waste my time with posts that the author was too lazy to proof read and structure.
Trolls will be trolls.
|
2/15/2014 8:47:54 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
There's really no such thing as a troll here.
|
2/15/2014 9:15:15 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fallguy02379
Brockton, MA
50, joined Sep. 2011
|
yet the GOP seems to have no idea how too improve things........
I think the current crop in the GOP is a party full of cowards.
They are incapable of leading
|
2/15/2014 9:38:57 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fallguy02379
Brockton, MA
50, joined Sep. 2011
|
Doing what is right is never easy that is why you lame asses always take the easy way out.
Can we get an example of a piece of legislation brought forward??
Some bill introduced by a republican that you feel is "right"?
ideas are great, they really are but, lets hear about something original that the republicans created on their own for the better good of the USA
|
2/15/2014 9:41:54 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
deletedqueen
Riverhead, NY
50, joined Mar. 2013
|
What is right?
Easy answer... everything opposite that Obama is doing. .
|
2/15/2014 9:45:18 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fallguy02379
Brockton, MA
50, joined Sep. 2011
|
Easy answer... everything opposite that Obama is doing. .
like i said
the GOP can not make decisions, being anti-Obama is why the GOP is coming as weak a party lacking leadership
Even with the country on the brink of default, the Senate’s highest ranking Republican says his “single most important” goal is to make Barack Obama a one-term president.
“The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told National Journal‘s Major Garrett in October.
hmmm great example of how to come across as a failure
|
2/15/2014 10:02:24 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fallguy02379
Brockton, MA
50, joined Sep. 2011
|
fallguy02379
Give it up man easy is what you do.
i knew it wouldn't take long for someone to draw a blank
the party of name calling and finger pointers have supporters you mimic their "leaders"
|
2/15/2014 10:26:28 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
Easy answer... everything opposite that Obama is doing. .
And here is the intellect of the rank and file right
This is it.
Just whatever Obama does is what they're opposed to
We've known it all along but it's refreshing to hear someone actually say it up front. To really admit that they don't know anything. And don't gather convictions through independent study.
|
2/15/2014 10:36:55 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fallguy02379
Brockton, MA
50, joined Sep. 2011
|
And here is the intellect of the rank and file right
This is it.
Just whatever Obama does is what they're opposed to
We've known it all along but it's refreshing to hear someone actually say it up front. To really admit that they don't know anything. And don't gather convictions through independent study.
for some reason they think they are coming with bright ideas yet, you hear nothing for ideas nor do you hear what policies they feel are hurting the US.
zero substance from them
|
2/15/2014 10:43:17 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
They're on the wrong side of every issue. That's why they need Citizens United decisions and crazy district drawing.
They can't win on ideas
|
2/15/2014 10:48:57 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
hardtwist
Surprise, NE
46, joined Jun. 2009
|
Now hold on leeq. I firmly believe both parties are wrong. The current crop of politicians, Im against.
Look up Country Of Origen Labeling or COOL. You will know how f**king worthless they are.
|
2/15/2014 11:08:12 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
leeag
Milwaukee, WI
47, joined May. 2011
|
Quote from hardtwist:Now hold on leeq. I firmly believe both parties are wrong. The current crop of politicians, Im against.
The next crop is the same (or will be).
It makes me laugh when I hear people talk about how they're gonna vote out the incumbents and go for an outsider.
The outsider has to spend most of his time fundraising for his reelection
Get the money out of politics!
|
2/15/2014 11:28:24 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
hardtwist
Surprise, NE
46, joined Jun. 2009
|
I agree. Gone are the days of a politician, that serves the voters.
|
2/16/2014 8:51:06 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/16/2014 9:00:18 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
(this post has been flagged as inappropriate, sorry.)
|
2/16/2014 9:27:08 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
(this post has been flagged as inappropriate, sorry.)
|
2/16/2014 9:51:30 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/16/2014 10:17:01 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
55, joined Feb. 2008
|
Easy answer... everything opposite that Obama is doing. .
Pretty brainless mentality if you stop to think about it.
Oh wait......What am I saying?
You?
Think?
Never mind.
|
2/16/2014 10:27:16 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
inventtis2
South Haven, MI
36, joined Nov. 2012
|
(this post has been flagged as inappropriate, sorry.)
|
2/16/2014 10:35:33 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
peterk2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
54, joined May. 2007
|
Many like Clarity use the fear tactic.
It is either Facism, Communism, Gun control or Socialism.
When they finish trying to scare the public,
they go back to Benghazi to catch their breath and polish their guns.
They have no solutions,
no recommendations,
no vision,
and the hate they project is amazing.
yes, you love fascism and socialism. you shove it up our a** daily, many times hourly.
probably because its done so well overseas. yeah, that's it.
|
2/16/2014 10:40:20 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
willblock775
Berwyn, IL
44, joined Jan. 2013
|
That is a great depiction of the unintended consequences of low information voting of liberals.
|
2/16/2014 2:21:28 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
peterk2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
54, joined May. 2007
|
go smoke a doob with your granddaughter, loser.
|
2/16/2014 4:06:19 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fmrqb
Richmond Hill, ON
34, joined Oct. 2012
|
These threads kill me sometimes, its not different in Canada
In Canada , the liberals ( grits) blames the PC(progressive conservatives),
NDP and Green party ( socialists) hates the PC
the PC aka tories blames the Corporations
the corporations blames the government
the citizen care about hockey night in Canada , what is Don cherry wearing during Coaches corner and if they win the Gold at the World Junior hockey tournament and if they have timbits with their Timmies coffee.
but what it boils down to is
GOVERNMENT INTERFERES WITH EVERYTHING>
In America the Democrats blames the Republicans, the republican blames the Democrates
The tea party blames Obama
The socialist blames the Capitalist
Wall street Republicans blames the White house
and the wealthy 1%doesn't give a damn, they care about living life and making money.
what it boils down to is
GOVERNMENT INTERFERES WITH EVERYTHING
|
2/16/2014 4:43:40 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
Many like Clarity use the fear tactic.
It is either Facism, Communism, Gun control or Socialism.
When they finish trying to scare the public,
they go back to Benghazi to catch their breath and polish their guns.
They have no solutions,
no recommendations,
no vision,
and the hate they project is amazing.
whaaaaat????
you are such a lying hipocrite
but gotta admit you have the leftwingnitwits attack mode talking points down pat!
|
2/16/2014 4:59:52 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/16/2014 5:02:57 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/16/2014 5:17:51 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
inventtis2
South Haven, MI
36, joined Nov. 2012
|
That is a great depiction of the unintended consequences of low information voting of liberals.
They don't seem to understand that actions have consequences and usually when the government is involved the consequences are always bad.
|
2/16/2014 5:23:23 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
cattoaster
Indianapolis, IN
33, joined Nov. 2013
|
Liberals are self centered and only care about what affects them personally they never acquired the ability to see the bigger picture.
|
2/16/2014 5:42:03 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
cattoaster
Indianapolis, IN
33, joined Nov. 2013
|
You're describing right wingers. Stop projecting.
I have noticed that you add very little to these posts.
|
2/16/2014 6:31:05 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/16/2014 10:25:23 PM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fallguy02379
Brockton, MA
50, joined Sep. 2011
|
how did those 8 years go for the USA during the Bush years?
How would you rate GWB to Reagan and Clinton?
Why are so many of you forbidding yourself from acknowledging his presidency anyways?
|
2/17/2014 7:03:12 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/17/2014 8:35:20 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/17/2014 8:48:38 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/17/2014 8:59:07 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
America's new speech "standard" - anything that makes a liberal feel bad is "offensive."
Left-wing dogma is shutting down free speech on universities...
1st Amendment Uproar: University Removes Pro-Life Poster, Says 'We Have to Keep It Happy for Everybody'
On 14, Feb 2014
Officials at the University of Alabama are facing criticism for taking down a student organization’s pro-life display. The poster, which features pictures of unborn babies and mothers who died after an abortion, was sponsored by student group Bama Students for Life. University officials stated that the display was taken down after they received complaints that the images were graphic and offensive.
The student group decided to fight the decision, stating in a letter that it violated their right to free speech and requesting that the University correct its early removal of the display. From Yellowhammer News:
The letter cites US Supreme Court case Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393, 409 (2007), which prohibits educational institutions from prohibiting free-speech that they may find offensive.
“Universities are supposed to be the marketplace of ideas, not arenas for censoring particular viewpoints just because someone feels offended,” said Legal Counsel Matt Sharp. “We support Bama Students for Life and look forward to continuing to working with them to ensure that their constitutional freedoms are protected.”
Being exposed to diverse ideas and viewpoints is vital to education and personal growth. The practice of handpicking which ideas can be shared and which can’t impedes learning, and it certainly should not be tolerated at a government-funded university.
If officials truly feel that, as the administrator says in the video, nothing offensive can be displayed in the student union, then it should probably be a bunch of blank, boring walls. Almost anything is going to offend one person or another.
|
2/17/2014 9:11:47 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
2/17/2014 9:12:49 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
fmrqb
Richmond Hill, ON
34, joined Oct. 2012
|
well i dont understand the fuss Clarity?
All politicians are hypocritical , Democrats, Republicans and Im sure if the Tea party has a representative in the White house one day they will do things that are hypocritical too.
While Liberals are left leaning delusional beings, conservatives that think they have the answer by not allowing pure capitalism in is just as delusional in my opinion.
|
2/17/2014 9:19:27 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
the topic of THIS thread.....
Liberals are not too bright.
Conservative Daily
“Democrats have checked their conscience at the door of the Obama presidency.”
|
2/17/2014 9:24:34 AM |
Liberal's are not too bright. |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
63, joined Oct. 2008
|
Famous Lefty Filmmakers Have Scathing Criticism for Obama and MSNBC Cheerleaders
Caroline Schaeffer
On February 16, 2014
http://ijreview.com
Well, this was unexpected. Hardcore left-wing filmmakers Oliver Stone and Jeremy Scahill appeared at a libertarian student convention on Saturday and slammed the President and his media cohorts for their “expanding warfare state.”
Oliver Stone, director of such left-wing and anti-war movies as “W.” and “Platoon,” joined Scahill, the author and filmmaker of anti-war flick “Dirty Wars,” in a panel entitled “Imperial Overreach and the National Security State.” It was held at the “Students for Liberty” conference.
Mediaite reports that while lamenting Obama’s abandonment of his 2008 anti-war rhetoric, they also took MSNBC and Bill Maher to task for failing to hold the President accountable for his “overreach” on issues like targeted assassinations, covert operations and military interventions.
“MSNBC is a like a DNC meet-up,” Scahill said. “While Fox News is just filled with conspiracies about this Muslim manchurian candidate.”
“If you watch MSNBC,” [Scahill] said, “they have figured out every possible excuse for why al-Awlaki was killed.”
Stone didn’t hold back, providing one of the most severe criticisms we’ve heard of the President yet.
“The man stunned us with a lack of spine,” the filmmaker said. “He’s a weak man.”
Ouch. Harsh words from a man who donated $4,600 to the Obama campaign in 2008 and called then-Senator Obama a possible “heir to John F. Kennedy.” Maybe in the sixth year of the Obama presidency, more people will finally figure out that it’s not all “Bush’s fault.”
|