|
skipthegames hookupsIf you are working with apps like Booking, do take advantage of the discounts with much more hotel bookings. free chat georgia The Supreme Court showdown more than Biden s vaccine policies, explained Biden s vaccination policies could save thousands of lives. The list under offers a couple of examples of some popular stories or suspicious behaviors scammers could use to build trust and sympathy so they can manipulate an additional user in an unhealthy way. what are canadian girls like There are so lots of wonderful and engaging activities speed dating, pub quizzes and cookery classes are some of the couple of offerings. anonymous hookup websiteFortunately, Cecile walked away unharmed but the same couldn t be said for her automobile. huntington beach singles Keep in mind, these questions are not supposed to be an inquisition and there are no appropriate or incorrect answers. Popularised as a hook up app, Tinder became the new avenue to meet folks and make all sorts of alliances. how to date a peruvian woman Everyone wants to be loved, but no one particular desires to contemplate what it is that they actually provide. Home Sign In Search Date Ideas Join Forums Singles Groups - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!
9/15/2015 2:41:42 AM |
|
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
"Pay them a living wage so I do not have to subsidize the working poor"
Yeah, right
Here are Walmart numbers from two sources
Revenue
Increase US$ 485.651 billion (2014)
Operating income
Increase US$ 27.147 billion (2014)
Net income
Increase US$ 16.363 billion (2014)
Number of employees
2.2 million (2015)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walmart
---------------
Revenue......485.65B
Net Income.......16.36B
http://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/stockdetails/fi-126.1.WMT.NYS?ocid=INSFIST10
---------------
For your info, the formula for calculating operating income is:
Operating Income = Revenue MINUS Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), Labor, and other day-to-day expenses
NOW,
1. Assuming 90% of Walmart employees (approx. 2 million world-wide) are minimum wage workers earning $9/hr U.S. (PPP)
2. Assuming an average of $15/hr U.S. X 40hrs X 52 weeks = living wage
3. Assuming 90% of Walmart employees were given a $6/hr raise, and/or a living wage
Thus, 2 million X $6 X 40 X 52 weeks = $24.96 billion
QUESTION: Would Walmart cease to exist?
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
9/15/2015 2:56:29 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
k1ngmaker
Edmonton, AB
35, joined Apr. 2010
|
So what you're saying is that they can't exist unless we subsidize them. Oh well, guess they can go out of business then right? It's not like others stores won't take their places. You do realize that north America used to have people who got paid living wages in their stores right?
|
9/15/2015 4:41:08 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
. Oh well, guess theySo what you're saying is that they can't exist unless we subsidize them can go out of business then right? It's not like others stores won't take their places. You do realize that north America used to have people who got paid living wages in their stores right?
In the discount retail industry, one formula kept wages down;
cheap labor in manufacturing, volume, and global distribution
This formula also affected many specialty retailers, however, many have survived and are doing well due to a loyal upper-middle class clientele.
|
9/15/2015 6:43:49 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
What about the fast food junkies?
McDonald's
Revenue......27.44B
Net Income......4.76B
Number of employees.....420,000 (2014)
http://www.msn.com/en-ca/money/stockdetails/fi-126.1.MCD.NYS?ocid=INSFIST10
----------
Thus, 420,000 X 90% X $6 raise X 40 X 52 weeks = $4.7 billion
Gone!
|
9/15/2015 6:44:59 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
condor_0000
Tampa, FL
58, joined Feb. 2013
|
I don't know if telling the overwhelming majority of the world's people, the working class, that they need to be slave labor so that capitalism can continue to exist and make billionaires who don't work lots more money, is really a winning argument.
|
9/15/2015 6:53:12 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
inventtis2
South Haven, MI
37, joined Nov. 2012
|
Prices would just go up and they would gain little or more jobs would be pushed over seas.
|
9/15/2015 6:59:33 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
deneez
Rochester, MI
56, joined Apr. 2012
|
I don't know if telling the overwhelming majority of the world's people, the working class, that they need to be slave labor so that capitalism can continue to exist and make billionaires who don't work lots more money, is really a winning argument.
There is no way capitalism will cease. every store owner, farmer, bakery, or anyone who engages in the market IS a capitalist. call them 'petty' if you like, but it never mattered if YOU like, I like it, or anyone else likes it.
people are free to utilize a talent as a livelihood, and are free to engage in meaningful ways to make a living. they are free to 'have' capital (they own their means of production) and to engage in transactions that make them money.
people are also free to determine what a living wage is for them.
the idea that YOU, or I, or anyone else for that matter can determine what this is, does not take into account the 'petty' capitalist who is more than happy on 35,000/year because he does what he loves.
you continue to fail because you don't realize that the problem isn't too much capitalism, it's too few capitalist's.
if you support the 'big boxes', YOU are raping your own community.
|
9/15/2015 7:00:33 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
condor_0000
Tampa, FL
58, joined Feb. 2013
|
Prices would just go up and they would gain little or more jobs would be pushed over seas.
I don't know if telling the overwhelming majority of the world's people, the working class, that under the capitalist system there is zero possibility that they will ever be more than slave labor; and that any increase in their income in a capitalist society will only be met by increased prices, thereby keeping then perpetually as nothing more than slaves to rich capitalist parasites, is really a winning argument.
|
9/15/2015 7:02:44 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
deneez
Rochester, MI
56, joined Apr. 2012
|
I don't know if telling the overwhelming majority of the world's people, the working class, that under the capitalist system there is zero possibility that they will ever be more than slave labor; and that any increase in their income in a capitalist society will only be met by increased prices, thereby keeping then perpetually as nothing more than slaves to rich capitalist parasites, is really a winning argument.
The problem with capitalism isn't too much capitalism, it's too few capitalists.
|
9/15/2015 7:06:04 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
condor_0000
Tampa, FL
58, joined Feb. 2013
|
you continue to fail because you don't realize that the problem isn't too much capitalism, it's too few capitalist's.
Why Socialism?
by Albert Einstein
Excerpt:
Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.
|
9/15/2015 7:09:30 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
condor_0000
Tampa, FL
58, joined Feb. 2013
|
The problem with capitalism isn't too much capitalism, it's too few capitalists.
We have exactly the society capitalism has created. It's not a big mystery why Walmart, Home Depot, McDonalds and Lowes are everywhere.
|
9/15/2015 7:13:41 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
inventtis2
South Haven, MI
37, joined Nov. 2012
|
I don't know if telling the overwhelming majority of the world's people, the working class, that under the capitalist system there is zero possibility that they will ever be more than slave labor; and that any increase in their income in a capitalist society will only be met by increased prices, thereby keeping then perpetually as nothing more than slaves to rich capitalist parasites, is really a winning argument.
It was just what I would expect to happen. I believe they could be paid more, but if they get a $6/hr raise, then I want a $30/hr raise, because I'm still worth more than they are by a wide margin.
|
9/15/2015 7:23:11 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
condor_0000
Tampa, FL
58, joined Feb. 2013
|
It was just what I would expect to happen. I believe they could be paid more, but if they get a $6/hr raise, then I want a $30/hr raise, because I'm still worth more than they are by a wide margin.
Oh my God! No! Well, I can clearly see now that if we don't pay most workers slave wages, why the entire capitalist system will collapse as all workers will demand higher wages all along the scale. But tell me again how that's a winning argument for capitalism.
|
9/15/2015 7:34:49 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
peterk2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
55, joined May. 2007
|
So what you're saying is that they can't exist unless we subsidize them. Oh well, guess they can go out of business then right? It's not like others stores won't take their places. You do realize that north America used to have people who got paid living wages in their stores right?
no, they never did. min wage is only just meant to be a starter.
people cant move up b/c their bosses cant move up. the econ is ded.
dems have overtaxed and overregulated the econ, why else would companies move offshore?
|
9/15/2015 7:38:52 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
txninnc
Euless, TX
47, joined May. 2014
|
|
9/15/2015 7:42:09 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
peterk2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
55, joined May. 2007
|
kinkfake's hero, amoralfukr, condom, foulcon, chitty lights, haggie valley, miztakegal, muldumb too.
[Edited 9/15/2015 7:43:09 AM ]
|
9/15/2015 7:48:28 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
condor_0000
Tampa, FL
58, joined Feb. 2013
|
min wage is only just meant to be a starter.
We don't even need to turn to history to defeat that idiotic argument. We can simply look around the world and see what capitalism is currently doing.
We all know that American capitalists have long been eliminating good-paying factory jobs in America and exporting production to slave-waged locations around the world.
Minimum wage isn't some kind of starter wage from where everyone quickly moves up. Minimum wage is actually significantly ABOVE the wages capitalists want to pay workers as parasitic capitalists seek to get rich off the labor of others.
------------------
Pew report: 84 percent of world population subsists on under $20 per day
By Andre Damon
11 July 2015
World Socialist Web Site
https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/07/11/poor-j11.html
Disney's Hell in Haiti
http://www.hartford-hwp.com/archives/43a/294.html
Capitalism's Ideal Workplace is the Prison
By Chris Hedges
April 06, 2015
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41455.htm
How Slavery Gave Capitalism Its Start
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/24/how-slavery-gave-capitalism-its-start.html
|
9/15/2015 7:48:54 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
reginamc
Las Vegas, NV
60, joined Mar. 2011
|
It was just what I would expect to happen. I believe they could be paid more, but if they get a $6/hr raise, then I want a $30/hr raise, because I'm still worth more than they are by a wide margin.
Exactly! They will be making more than their supervisors.
|
9/15/2015 7:52:42 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
peterk2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
55, joined May. 2007
|
why arent the guys selling beer or hot dogs paid just as much as A-Rod?
gee! it isnt fair!
its just so much better under communism. or banana republic police states.
|
9/15/2015 7:55:28 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
peterk2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
55, joined May. 2007
|
We all know that American capitalists have long been eliminating good-paying factory jobs in America and exporting production to slave-waged locations around the world.
you left out american schools training international workers, democratic overtaxing, overregulating chasing companies out of here and creating mortgage messes.
how nice for your commie lie
|
9/15/2015 8:17:02 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
We have exactly the society capitalism has created. It's not a big mystery why Walmart, Home Depot, McDonalds and Lowes are everywhere.
Condor,
Capitalism hasn't just created discount retailers, and fast food junkies
For example; at least 2,200 SLAVE employees at Microsoft's became millionaires, and the company founders, billionaires.
|
9/15/2015 8:20:29 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
condor_0000
Tampa, FL
58, joined Feb. 2013
|
Condor,
Capitalism hasn't just created discount retailers, and fast food junkies
For example; at least 2,200 SLAVE employees at Microsoft's became millionaires, and the company founders, billionaires.
Yep! So, see everybody! We need the overwhelming majority of workers to be paid slave wages so that workers can all become millionaires.
Wait a minute! What?
|
9/15/2015 8:29:39 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
peterk2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
55, joined May. 2007
|
slave wages are democratic. everybody starts at them.
they were never meant to be a career, except in your commie brain.
go back to russia
|
9/15/2015 8:41:50 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
jrbogie1949
Ventura, CA
66, joined Mar. 2009
|
There is no way capitalism will cease. every store owner, farmer, bakery, or anyone who engages in the market IS a capitalist. call them 'petty' if you like, but it never mattered if YOU like, I like it, or anyone else likes it.
people are free to utilize a talent as a livelihood, and are free to engage in meaningful ways to make a living. they are free to 'have' capital (they own their means of production) and to engage in transactions that make them money.
people are also free to determine what a living wage is for them.
the idea that YOU, or I, or anyone else for that matter can determine what this is, does not take into account the 'petty' capitalist who is more than happy on 35,000/year because he does what he loves.
you continue to fail because you don't realize that the problem isn't too much capitalism, it's too few capitalist's.
if you support the 'big boxes', YOU are raping your own community.
wow, i was about to say, 'very well said,' and then i read your last sentence. can you connect all of your praise for capitalism with your claim that support for big boxes is synonymous with raping my community? how could walmart exist were it not for a relatively free market, capitalistic economic system that we in america enjoy? christy walton may have been born with a silver spoon in her mouth but ole' sam sure as hell wasn't.
|
9/15/2015 8:44:25 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
Yep! So, see everybody! We need the overwhelming majority of workers to be paid slave wages so that workers can all become millionaires.
Wait a minute! What?
Condor, tell me;
Is it fair that a full-time employee at XYZ exploration earns 10 times as much as a full time employee at McDonald's?
|
9/15/2015 8:52:58 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
jrbogie1949
Ventura, CA
66, joined Mar. 2009
|
Yep! So, see everybody! We need the overwhelming majority of workers to be paid slave wages so that workers can all become millionaires.
Wait a minute! What?
you're not suggesting that the overwhelming majority of workers in america are paid slave wages are you? are you really?
|
9/15/2015 8:53:04 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
There is no way capitalism will cease. every store owner, farmer, bakery, or anyone who engages in the market IS a capitalist.
Only if they have non-family employees, pay those employees less than the value they produce, and pocket the difference.
The fact that many workers also engage in capitalism to some extent (as we live in a capitalist world) does not prove that capitalism is absolutely necessary.
On the other hand, the fact that the native North American tribes thrived for hundreds of years without it proves that it isn't necessary.
|
9/15/2015 8:54:57 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
you're not suggesting that the overwhelming majority of workers in america are paid slave wages are you? are you really?
I don't see "in America" anywhere in his post.
The thing about socialists is that they look more at the big picture, and what benefits workers in general... Rather than just what benefits them personally, or their family/town/whatever.
I suppose that's a big part of why they are social-ists.
|
9/15/2015 8:58:27 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
jrbogie1949
Ventura, CA
66, joined Mar. 2009
|
I don't see "in America" anywhere in his post.
The thing about socialists is that they look more at the big picture, and what benefits workers in general... Rather than just what benefits them personally, or their family/town/whatever.
I suppose that's a big part of why they are social-ists.
didn't say 'america' was in his post, did i? the question was meant to allow him to clarify a statement he made for ME. is that okay with you??? may i ask questions of others here as i see fit???
|
9/15/2015 9:07:19 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
It was just what I would expect to happen. I believe they could be paid more, but if they get a $6/hr raise, then I want a $30/hr raise, because I'm still worth more than they are by a wide margin.
This is ridiculous. What you have to understand is that there's a huge difference between the first $20k or so in salary (that you need to spend to survive) and the next 20k, 100k, million, whatever.
The point of a living wage is more about not needing to take money from you and me in taxes to pay welfare to workers who don't make enough for food and shelter. It isn't a who does what thing... Everyone needs food and shelter.
|
9/15/2015 9:13:40 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
didn't say 'america' was in his post, did i? the question was meant to allow him to clarify a statement he made for ME. is that okay with you??? may i ask questions of others here as i see fit???
Sure, as long as I can question you as I see fit when I think your question is posed in a silly way.
You knew he wasn't focused only on America, so your question was rhetorical I guess?
As long as we allow the Capitalists to keep us divided and conquered (and dreaming of being able to "earn" money for nothing like them), they will continue to keep us under their heel.
|
9/15/2015 9:35:19 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
alls_fair
Thorlákshöfn
Iceland
95, joined May. 2011
|
Are you subsidizing the poor???
Or are you providing welfare for the rich???
I humbly maintain that it is welfare for the rich you are providing...as well as convenient one stop tax collection for the gubment...
(I am sure you can imagine that collecting taxes from ONE super retailer is far more convenient than collecting from 1000 different retailers.)
If wally world and mcdonald's go belly up, it far from any great loss to the people or the nation!
[Edited 9/15/2015 9:36:02 AM ]
|
9/15/2015 9:59:49 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
52, joined Mar. 2014
online now!
|
why arent the guys selling beer or hot dogs paid just as much as A-Rod?
gee! it isnt fair!
its just so much better under communism. or banana republic police states.
Here we go again...raising minimum wage is not EQUAL to paying the beer vendor the same A-Rod is paid...
Why do right wing morons ALWAYS jump to that?
If Walmart can not survive paying a living wage they should close their doors...
and I for one HOPE THEY do...I have not shopped at Walmart since the 1980's...
|
9/15/2015 10:05:52 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mr_bad_robot
Cincinnati, OH
40, joined Jul. 2014
|
Where I live the average living wage would be for a family of 4 with one adult working $21.30 an hour working 2080 hours a year with company provided health care benefits.
Now these wages are rock bottom bare minimal.
$21.30 is $44,304 gross per year for a family of 4.
I don't see a company like Walmart paying $21.30 an hour with health care benefits and providing their employees with 2080 hours of work every year.
|
9/15/2015 10:23:32 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
Yasureoktoo
Seattle, WA
60, joined Dec. 2014
|
Where I live the average living wage would be for a family of 4 with one adult working $21.30 an hour working 2080 hours a year with company provided health care benefits.
Now these wages are rock bottom bare minimal.
$21.30 is $44,304 gross per year for a family of 4.
I don't see a company like Walmart paying $21.30 an hour with health care benefits and providing their employees with 2080 hours of work every year.
what you are failing to print is that if a person makes 21 bucks an hour, he cost the company about 26 bucks an hour.
|
9/15/2015 10:35:34 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mr_bad_robot
Cincinnati, OH
40, joined Jul. 2014
|
what you are failing to print is that if a person makes 21 bucks an hour, he cost the company about 26 bucks an hour.
I never failed to print anything. I left out the total cost but made sure to include health care benefits to the equation.
However, my point was there is no way in hell a company like Walmart will begin to pay their employees this kind of money working 2080 hour a year with benefits.
|
9/15/2015 10:39:49 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
alls_fair
Thorlákshöfn
Iceland
95, joined May. 2011
|
Keeping employees in abject poverty is the "guarantee" they will keep returning to work...in a really dysfunctional employment philosophy!
And while that may seem absurd at first glance, it appears to be the prevalent attitude in the US...
|
9/15/2015 10:44:03 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
64, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
9/15/2015 10:44:47 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
Here we go again...raising minimum wage is not EQUAL to paying the beer vendor the same A-Rod is paid...
Why do right wing morons ALWAYS jump to that?
If Walmart can not survive paying a living wage they should close their doors...
and I for one HOPE THEY do...I have not shopped at Walmart since the 1980's...[/they will close their doors
there is only one law that would mandate companies to pay living wagesminimum wage
if there a law living wage, then yes, many
nuffan,
A few years ago, President Obama proposed increasing the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9, and then, the Congressional democrats proposed to raise it to $10.10, and peg it to inflation.
What region in the U.S. $10.10 X 40hrs X 52 weeks = $21,000 is a living wage for a single parent, one kid?
And according to LOBO, "The point of a living wage is more about not needing to take money from you and me in taxes to pay welfare to workers"
|
9/15/2015 10:46:27 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
Here we go again...raising minimum wage is not EQUAL to paying the beer vendor the same A-Rod is paid...
Why do right wing morons ALWAYS jump to that?
If Walmart can not survive paying a living wage they should close their doors...
and I for one HOPE THEY do...I have not shopped at Walmart since the 1980's...
nuffan,
A few years ago, President Obama proposed increasing the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9, and then, the Congressional democrats proposed to raise it to $10.10, and peg it to inflation.
What region in the U.S. $10.10 X 40hrs X 52 weeks = $21,000 is a living wage for a single parent, one kid?
And according to LOBO, "The point of a living wage is more about not needing to take money from you and me in taxes to pay welfare to workers
|
9/15/2015 10:50:01 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
Here we go again...raising minimum wage is not EQUAL to paying the beer vendor the same A-Rod is paid...
Why do right wing morons ALWAYS jump to that?
If Walmart can not survive paying a living wage they should close their doors...
and I for one HOPE THEY do...I have not shopped at Walmart since the 1980's...
Right-wing lemmings just love the fact that it costs $300 to take a couple of kids to a ball game. A-Rod makes 100,000,000 or whatever... Who do you think pays for that?
Just like when a CEO makes 100,000,000... Who do you think pays for that?
I think they fantasize that one day they too will get their 100,000,000 when "their ship comes in", and they don't want the party to be spoiled before they get there. Problem is, that's never ever going to happen.
|
9/15/2015 10:51:29 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
nuffan,
A few years ago, President Obama proposed increasing the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9, and then, the Congressional democrats proposed to raise it to $10.10, and peg it to inflation.
What region in the U.S. $10.10 X 40hrs X 52 weeks = $21,000 is a living wage for a single parent, one kid?
And according to LOBO, "The point of a living wage is more about not needing to take money from you and me in taxes to pay welfare to workers
Rural Georgia, etc, etc. What is your point?
|
9/15/2015 10:51:35 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mr_bad_robot
Cincinnati, OH
40, joined Jul. 2014
|
It's not Walmart's fault that good paying American jobs left the Country. It's the dumb a** consumers.
|
9/15/2015 10:58:07 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
52, joined Mar. 2014
online now!
|
nuffan,
A few years ago, President Obama proposed increasing the minimum wage from $7.25 to $9, and then, the Congressional democrats proposed to raise it to $10.10, and peg it to inflation.
What region in the U.S. $10.10 X 40hrs X 52 weeks = $21,000 is a living wage for a single parent, one kid?
And according to LOBO, "The point of a living wage is more about not needing to take money from you and me in taxes to pay welfare to workers
Well $21,000 will just about support an individual...
Single parent receiving Child support should be able to get by if they were earning $21,000...and the absent parent was also...
but at $7.25 per hour they make under $16,000 and generally the absent parent is probably making the same...making it difficult to survive much less pay support...
People tend to think living wage allows for the purchase of cigarettes, beer, drugs....it does not...
A living wage should cover food, rent, utilities, healthcare and transportation...
It is one thing if those at the bottom just completely mismanage their income...
It is a completely different thing when those at the bottom who actually are trying but can not make it without assistance...
calling them lazy addresses nothing...these are not the lazy people...They are actually willing to WORK...and yet STILL NEED ASSISTANCE...
|
9/15/2015 11:03:09 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
If Walmart's business isn't strong enough to afford their employees a living wage, then they should fold up and make way for businesses that can.
|
9/15/2015 11:07:07 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
nat_now
Ocala, FL
56, joined Jul. 2013
|
Rural Georgia, etc, etc. What is your point?
And their quality of life ranks right up there with grass huts and reading by candle light. But many really are unfit for any workplace. If some of that kind of area were any more lackadaisical about work, or laid-back, they'd be sleep walking.
Some people just weren't born into any hopes of success or principles, let alone ever be adept at anything.
Now, if they know folk singing, basket weaving, or gator rastlin'.. maybe they need to take their show on the road
|
9/15/2015 11:08:00 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
nat_now
Ocala, FL
56, joined Jul. 2013
|
If Walmart's business isn't strong enough to afford their employees a living wage, then they should fold up and make way for businesses that can.
They pay right for the brains it takes. Too bad if 4 people or 6 have to share digs to make a go of it.
|
9/15/2015 11:11:29 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
inventtis2
South Haven, MI
37, joined Nov. 2012
|
Don't have kids if you can't a Ford them either.
|
9/15/2015 11:17:22 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mr_bad_robot
Cincinnati, OH
40, joined Jul. 2014
|
Don't have kids if you can't a Ford them either.
You see that's the view most intelligent people have. It's unfortunate that America is lacking intelligent people.
|
9/15/2015 11:19:14 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
inventtis2
South Haven, MI
37, joined Nov. 2012
|
You see that's the view most intelligent people have. It's unfortunate that America is lacking intelligent people.
I think the government should pay smart people to have kids, instead of subsidizing the dumb ones to have kids.
|
9/15/2015 11:21:48 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
Yasureoktoo
Seattle, WA
60, joined Dec. 2014
|
I think the government should pay smart people to have kids, instead of subsidizing the dumb ones to have kids.
|
9/15/2015 11:23:09 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
I never failed to print anything. I left out the total cost but made sure to include health care benefits to the equation.
However, my point was there is no way in hell a company like Walmart will begin to pay their employees this kind of money working 2080 hour a year with benefits.
Walmart can't pay all their employees living wages, they are a global discount retailer...."we sell for less"
high volume orders from the cheapest manufacturing country, and mass distribution
one laptop....$200 per unit
one million laptops....$50 per unit
10 million......$40 per unit
and at a certain volume, the manufacturer list price becomes fractional
|
9/15/2015 11:33:49 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
nat_now
Ocala, FL
56, joined Jul. 2013
|
I think the government should pay smart people to have kids, instead of subsidizing the dumb ones to have kids.
Darwin's rolling in his grave.
|
9/15/2015 11:36:00 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
mralwaysrite
Estevan, SK
53, joined Feb. 2014
|
If Walmart's business isn't strong enough to afford their employees a living wage, then they should fold up and make way for businesses that can.
They are structured this way, it is what it is.
What's the difference between McDonald's and my employer?
In 2014, same operating income, same net income, however, 420,000 employees versus 3,000
and most of our equipment and supplies are still manufactured in the U.S. and Canada.
|
9/15/2015 11:46:06 AM |
Estevan, SK |
|
Yasureoktoo
Seattle, WA
60, joined Dec. 2014
|
If Walmart's business isn't strong enough to afford their employees a living wage, then they should fold up and make way for businesses that can.
But then who will pay for Christy Waltons Habbits.
It probably costs her several thousand a day to live.
|
9/15/2015 12:12:10 PM |
Estevan, SK |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
64, joined Oct. 2008
|
most of those i see complaining about a 'living wage' are under 50 years old....
does anyone know what a babysitter makes today??? oh wait they arent allowed to 'babysit'
any more. they have to be licensed and registered nannys or daycare providers making
$10-20 an hour. i made .50 an hour when i was 12-16.
first job i made $1.75 at A&W drive in...rollerskates and all.
i remember about 1970 they started the increased minimum wage to $2.25. i was 19 and
working for a doctors office and i was very happy to get a .25 pay increase.
in 1995 when i quit working for walmart and became selfemployed i was making a little
over $13 when minimum wage was about $5.
thru the years of selfemployment i increased my pay to about $25 an hour....
isnt that the AMERICAN WAY???
its called increased education +'increased cost of living' + increased wage = HARD WORK
|
9/15/2015 12:18:21 PM |
Estevan, SK |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
52, joined Mar. 2014
online now!
|
Walmart can't pay all their employees living wages, they are a global discount retailer...."we sell for less"
high volume orders from the cheapest manufacturing country, and mass distribution
Then they should close their doors is they can only make a profit exploiting the working poor...
|
9/15/2015 12:32:06 PM |
Estevan, SK |
|
Yasureoktoo
Seattle, WA
60, joined Dec. 2014
|
most of those i see complaining about a 'living wage' are under 50 years old....
does anyone know what a babysitter makes today??? oh wait they arent allowed to 'babysit'
any more. they have to be licensed and registered nannys or daycare providers making
$10-20 an hour. i made .50 an hour when i was 12-16.
first job i made $1.75 at A&W drive in...rollerskates and all.
i remember about 1970 they started the increased minimum wage to $2.25. i was 19 and
working for a doctors office and i was very happy to get a .25 pay increase.
in 1995 when i quit working for walmart and became selfemployed i was making a little
over $13 when minimum wage was about $5.
thru the years of selfemployment i increased my pay to about $25 an hour....
isnt that the AMERICAN WAY???
its called increased education +'increased cost of living' + increased wage = HARD WORK
I think the "living wage", concept is mostly the dropouts, crying they aren't making as much as the doctors.
|
9/15/2015 12:35:36 PM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
But then who will pay for Christy Waltons Habbits.
It probably costs her several thousand a day to live.
She makes a million dollars per hour or more, so I suppose we don't need to shed a tear for her.
If there's any seriousness to your question, I'm sure Christy can get by just fine spending her vast inheritance without needing a continual flow of more money from us. She, her kids, and her great-great grandkids need never contribute anything to society - They were all set for life as of the day Sam Walton's will was read.
So how does it make any rational sense to send more money to them?
|
9/15/2015 12:36:54 PM |
Estevan, SK |
|
lobo_corazon
Orleans, ON
46, joined May. 2008
|
I think the government should pay smart people to have kids, instead of subsidizing the dumb ones to have kids.
But no sex ed, birth control or abortions, right?
|
mralwaysrite - Estevan, SK
|
|