"The pyramids: It doesn't take a degree in rocket science to figure out how to stack heavy rocks onto heavy rocks or to move rocks from one place to another" -> you're correct, it requires a firm understanding of architecture and physics. Nothing requires a degree except employment oppertunities. Although the pyramids and shitloads of other ancient structures still can't be replicated today, logs or no logs, lifting some of the structures into place would have required access to equipment they simply didn't have, not only that but the way in which some of the stones are fused together or cut is completely beyond contemporary methods. There is definate mystery in this realm and some of the strongest evidence for the wild claims at hand.

However I agree completely that advanced beings create advanced structures. But these types of structures aren't meant for office work or as domiciles, they are more like memorials or monuments in most cases, very much like what you see in the contemorary world. And stone is also one of the few things economically ideal for making something which will last for many millenia, and that very much indicates who or what ever built those structures wanted them around for some reason. I don't know about you but I don't care how much someone believes in gods or living deities, you don't build massive monuments as a grave, your slaves would sooner die than serve that purpose, and your jailors would have been over thrown. But still there is no reason to think it was aliens just yet.

I love your optimism. I'm not so sure it is warranted, but who knows? lol

I'm going to take your response one piece at a time...

Mathematical calculation is NOT evidence, it is at best, analysis of evidence. This leaves us with one question: What is the evidence?

Why are you willing to accept the unverifiable claims of visitation based on the sheer numbers of claims, yet equally unwilling to accept the unverifiable claims of being touched by god by an even larger number of witnesses?

Take more than just a few minutes to think about that.

I don't need but a second. I don't accept any unvarified claims what-so-ever. Obviously you weren't paying very close attention to what I wrote.

As for mathematical calculation being evidence, you're wrong. But I don't recall ever saying that it was either. I will say this though, almost every theory was confirmed into law by way of physical experimentation backed up (and set up) by mathematical calculations.

Now you can trash all over the laws of physics if you like, but you can't trash on math. It's undebunkable, consistent, rock solid. Any imbicile can figure that out. It's logic by definition.

As for the claims of people being touched by god, I've yet to even see a person explain what that means, and even my mother and brother make such retarded claims and when questioned simply say "they can't explain".

You're talking about comparing cases of actual evidence, with cases of obvious insanity. Apples and lead paint friend, they're not even in the same realm. I'm sorry though that you haven't figured out even that much about life though. It's like seeing a 40yr old who still thinks there is a chance that santa might be real.

And to confirm, I don't believe that ancient aliens came to earth, the sources of the supposed evidence itself comes from narcassistic dishonest delusional people to begin with, don't put too much stock into that show, it's just a money scheme.

I think it's possible, and that much of the worlds mysteries could be easily explained by such, but the math doesn't lie, the science doesn't lie, and there is enough evidence of which I haven't bothered to share here that shows that pretty clearly.

But these are my personal opinions, and unless you have something truly interesting to say than I'm not interested in you trying to change them.

But I'll lay out the very simple rules for you to consider:

#1 The universe is vast and natural, and nothing could, would, or did create it.
#2 The universe is so vast and evolution so natural that intelligent life actually capable of intersteller travel at a resonable rate of time is as likely as me getting married to a 10 tomorrow.

I guess this is what I would call a gut instinct, or a head instinct. It's all about odds, there is no question intelligent life occured somewhere else in the cosmos... we're here aren't we? Don't be so arrogant to think you're the only one.

Here's the limitations.

God doesn't exist, because what kind of c*nt makes a huge universe for a single lame a** planet full of dipshits?


Being that god does not exist, life MUST form naturally... to think earth is the only place is to be a complete f**king dipshit.


end of theory, hypothosis... whatever you call it, it's plain to understand. simple, and I'm not writing science books here, I'm making speculation about very obvious things that must be fact... if not fact... more amazing, more important, more impossible than normal truth.


punch holes in it genius. and although I take EVERYTHING as a challenge, I have respect for my competitors.

Be a little specific here...we don't want those against the Mexicans to believe the removal of hearts takes place in present times.

The ones who removed the hearts were the Aztecs.