Here Is A Look Into The Future

7/28/2016 9:20:52 AM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	I think this is a profound look at what the future holds for both the democraps and the repubics.Both of these parties have been asleep at the wheel since about the time clintoon took office.The demos push their agenda the repubs sit on their a** and watch and do nothing to stop it.The general public is watching this bullshit and are finally getting pissed off about.Even the left leaning bunch is fed up with the way the country is being run.Most of us have been saying for a long while that it's time for a third party to come on to the scene.The Libertarian Party is growing and could be a strong force to deal with in 2020.One thing that bothers me about this libertian party is some of the people who have endorsed it are a little on the flakey side. Semper Fi !!! As much as Donald Trump may surge in polls after winning the Republican presidential nomination, there is a growing GOP exodus to the Libertarian Party — retiring Utah Sen. Mark Madsen as the latest defector, The Salt Lake Tribune reports. The direction of the Republican Party turned Madsen away and, as he said at a news conference, “makes me want to cry, because I have invested a lot in that party,” the Tribune reports. Nicholas Sarwark, Libertarian National Committee chairman, noted this is the latest in an “accelerating movement” to his party after the Republican National Convention. “After the disaster that we saw in Cleveland, in which a party that was once storied has nominated a reality show star for president, where the convention chairman’s cutting off the microphone of a sitting U.S. senator, it’s broken,” Sarwark said, according to the Tribune. “It’s fundamentally broken and it’s dying.” Madsen follows Nevada Rep. John Moore and Nebraska Sen. Laura Ebke to the Libertarian Party, who both made the switch this year. The following is a list of Libertarian backers of Gary Johnson for president, as compiled by the Independent Journal Review. Marvin Bush, the youngest son of President George H. Bush Gov. Jesse Ventura (I-Minn.) Rep. Tom Campbell (R-Calif.) State Rep. Max Abramson (L-N.H.) State Rep. Nicholas Schwaderer (R-Mont.) The Price Is Right host, Drew Carey The Montel Williams Show host, Montel Williams Penn and Teller, magicians act New England Patriots player, Chris Long Dallas Cowboys quarterback, Rudy Carpenter Bassist for Nirvana, Krist Novoselic Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
7/28/2016 10:51:58 AM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
sureshot40 Drumright, OK 48, joined Apr. 2011	I agree a lot with the libertarian party except when it comes to open borders, free trade, decriminalizing all drugs and foreign policy. They are the ones pushing the hardest to shut down the federal reserve and I agree with that.
7/31/2016 6:17:45 PM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
purplerider1200 South Bend, IN 61, joined Aug. 2011	Any party will have it's share of crazies, there's no way to avoid it. Libertarians bring many good ideas to the table. Will we agree to all? Of course not. Too many of us refuse to be "Sheeple" or lemmings, whichever you prefer. Too many allow themselves to be bought off by money offered in social programs. If, we can bring back good jobs, and give lots of opportunity to all, then you may see a Libertarian movement. When did you last see an election come off, that didn't have a complete idiot running, and you were afraid the idiot was going to win? Last one I can think of is Dukakis. Or Mc Govern. In 1996, I pulled the trigger for Ross Perot. This year, clinton worries the shit outta me. I keep hoping someone will drop a load of bricks on her head, and knock her off before she makes it to november.(Think I got a better chance of seeing the great pumpkin) Trump has to quit allowing himself to be baited into saying something stupid. And the repubs in congress have to grow a pair. I went to see Hillary's America today- very enlightening, and the best $4 bucks I've spent in a while. No wonder it's No.1 in political movies. It was good and held my attention. Go see it if you can, it's worth it. Dinesh D'Souza is worried about his life over it, with good reason.
8/1/2016 3:26:02 PM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Next time you hear Hillary, or any other Democrat, ranting about Republicans wanting to disenfranchise minorities by requiring voter ID, keep the following in mind: * In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility). * In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility). * In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters . * In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast. * The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout. * Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout . * In one Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters . NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote . Imagine that..... ARE WE THE DUMBEST NATION ON THE PLANET OR WHAT?
8/1/2016 4:21:40 PM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
8/1/2016 5:23:52 PM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Quote from clarity101: What The Media Is Not Telling You About The Muslim Who Attacked Donald Trump: He Is A Muslim Brotherhood Agent Who Wants To Advance Sharia Law And Bring Muslims Into The United States By Ted on July 31, 2016 By Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat (SHOEBAT EXCLUSIVE) The Muslim who attacked Donald Trump, Khizr Muazzam Khan, is a Muslim Brotherhood agent, working to bring Muslims into the United States. After reading what we discovered so far, it becomes obvious that Khan wanted to ‘trump’ Trump’s Muslim immigration policy of limiting Muslim immigration into the U.S. But not so fast. Trump we have your back. Khizr Muazzam Khan graduated in Punjab University Law College, as the New York Times confirms. He specialized in International Trade Law in Saudi Arabia. An interest lawyer for Islamic oil companies Khan wrote a paper, called In Defense of OPEC to defend the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), an intergovernmental oil company consisting of mainly Islamic countries. But more than this, Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia). Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).” A snapshot of his essay can be seen here: But Khan’s fascination with Islam isn’t the only issue lest they say he was a “moderate Muslim”. What is more worrisome is that at the bottom of the intro, Khan shows his appreciation and the source of his work and gives credit to an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood: “The contribution to this article of S. Ramadan’s writing is gratefully acknowledged.” This alone speaks volumes. Khan used the works of S. Ramadan to lay his foundation for his inspiration regarding the promotion of Sharia. S. Ramadan is Said Ramadan, head of the Islamic Center in Geneva and a major icon of the Muslim Brotherhood, the grandson of Hassan Al-Banna the founder and hero of the Muslim Brotherhood which spread terrorism throughout the world. UPDATE: We read through Khan’s work and will continue to post excerpts. It is obvious that Khan instructs Muslims to submit to Sharia: It is also crucial to mention more on Khan’s icon and who Said Ramadan was. Ramadan was a writer who wrote material for the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, an organization that has been promoting Islamic revivalism and indoctrination to recruit young people in Malaysia to jihadism. It is actually a Malaysian branch of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. Khan’s fascination for Muslim Brotherhood icon and Islamic Sharia stems from Ramadan’s book Islamic Law: Its Scope and Equity, which Khan gleaned from to do his work giving credit to Ramadan. A version of it was published for the Malaysian Muslim Youth Movement (a branch of WAMY): WAMY is the World Association of Muslim Youth which was created through the collaboration of the Wahhabist and Muslim Brotherhood led by Said Ramadan who was, again, the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton’s aid) and her parents Sayed Z. Abedin (father) and Saleha Mahmoud Abedin (mother). It was also financed by the wealthy Abdullah Omar Naseef, another boss of the Abedin family who was an Al-Qaeda financier. Again, Khan wrote his Sharia Law supporting work in the eighties while he was in Saudi Arabia, the motherland of Wahhabism. This would never be possible unless Khan clearly had the support of the Saudi Wahhabist religious institution. We took a snapshot of the text: While there is so much to glean from his work, time is of the essence, but Khan’s travel according to a recent report, he moved from Pakistan to the United Arab Emirates, a hotbed for the Muslim Brotherhood. Currently he runs a law firm in New York City called KM Khan Law Office. According to the website, the the law firm specializes in “immigration services” to bring Muslims into the U.S., which presents a clash with Trump’s suggested policy to limit Muslim immigration into the U.S. To understand the inception of Muslim immigration one must study the Muslim Minority Affairs, a paradigm and an Islamic jurisprudence created by Saudi Arabia which sparked during the times Khan lived in Saudi Arabia while collaborating with the Saudi kingdom. Khan needs further study and analysis to see how his connect with Hillary Clinton’s campaign since he serves the interest of Muslim oil companies as well as Muslim immigration into the U.S. Intelius reveals Khizr M. Khan used to work for Hogan & Hartson and Lovells, which has ties to the Clinton Foundation: “Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, is registered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign” “Many lawyers at Hogan Lovells remember the week in 2004 when U.S. Army Capt. Humayun Khan lost his life to a suicide bomber. Then-Hogan & Hartson attorneys mourned the death because the soldier’s father, Khizr Khan, a Muslim American immigrant, was among their beloved colleagues” Saudi interests with using Khan to advance Muslim immigration and advance Muslim Sharia is a lengthy subject which has ties to Hillary Clinton’s aid Huma Abedin as well. It will take hours of reading just to cover this topic on how it was The House of Saud’s “Muslim Minority Affairs” and the Abedins (Huma Abedin and family) that played a central role in using Muslim immigration to infiltrate the west with Wahhbi agenda. The House of Saud had used Huma’s father Sayed Zaynul Abedin’s work regarding the Muslim Minority Affairs in the West, published in 1998 as part of 29 works to construct a plan to conquer the U.S. with Islam. It is obvious that Khan is upset, that a Trump victory will eliminate and destroy decades of hard work to bring in Islamic immigration into the United States which was spearheaded by agents in Saudi Arabia like Khan and Huma Abedin and family (Sayed Z. Abedin) which we translated excerpts from his work. http://shoebat.com/2016/07/31/what-the-media-is-not-telling-you-about-the-muslim-who-attacked-donald-trump-he-is-a-muslim-brotherhood-agent-who-wants-to-advance-sharia-law-and-bring-muslims-into-the-united-states/
8/9/2016 9:29:45 AM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	Our country will not survive as a republic, regardless of who wins if something isn't done SOON to stop the liberal takeover of the entire system.We are past the point of needing a full blown revolution.We need to take the country back and put it back on the road the framers laid out in the constitution. Semper Fi !!! (WND) – Could our republic be on its last legs? If the judicial system continues to usurp power it doesn’t rightfully possess, then America’s current system can’t last much longer, according to Conservative Review senior editor Daniel Horowitz. “We will not survive another few years as a republic, irrespective of who wins this election, if the courts are not stripped of their power,” Horowitz declared during a recent appearance on the Mark Levin Show. Indeed, the nation is reaching a “cathartic moment in our history where elections don’t matter,” according to Horowitz. This is because unelected judges are deciding most major social and political questions with finality. Horowitz details the danger posed by the courts in his new book “Stolen Sovereignty: How to Stop Unelected Judges From Transforming America.” Levin praised the book, calling it “a must-read” and “a terrific book” and deeming Horowitz “one of the smartest young men in the conservative movement today.” Horowitz said he was inspired to write the book by two distinct events that happened Sept. 3, 2015. That was the day Rowan County, Kentucky, clerk Kim Davis was thrown in jail for refusing to violate her Christian faith by issuing “marriage” licenses to same-sex couples. This came after the Supreme Court in June created the constitutional “right” to homosexual marriage. Then also on Sept. 3, according to Horowitz, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel invalidated the deportation of a criminal alien because the individual was transgender. The judge applied international law to rule the alien could not be returned to Mexico because he might face persecution because of his gender identity. The judge then castigated the immigration officials in court for not using the proper pronoun to refer to the defendant. So on the same day a federal judge threw a peaceful clerk in jail for following her Christian faith, another federal judge ordered the ICE to release a dangerous criminal illegal alien. This dichotomy was emblematic of a major problem Horowitz sees drawing near. “I believe that we are reaching the final frontier of judicial tyranny,” Horowitz warned. “For years they’ve been codifying special privileges for protected classes, flipping unalienable rights on its head for protected classes of Americans. They’re now copying and pasting those rights to foreign nationals.” This manifests itself, according to Horowitz, when judges rule in favor of birthright citizenship and counting illegal aliens in the census while ruling against common sense state voter ID laws. “They are not only deciding every political and social question of our time that should be left to a legislature, they are preventing conservatives from even winning elections and having fair elections in the first place,” Horowitz said. “This is why I see this problem as pretty much the most imminent constitutional crisis we have to confront at this moment.”
8/9/2016 9:30:04 AM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	Some conservatives believe all they need to do is elect a Republican president who will then appoint more conservative judges, but Horowitz views this as a fool’s errand. For one thing, he said, it would take many years to replace enough liberal judges to make a serious difference, and Republican presidents do not have a great record anyway when it comes to appointing judges who turn out to be conservative. Horowitz believes America has reached a point of no return and the only answer now is to strip the courts of jurisdiction over certain issues. This requires no new law or constitutional amendment because Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to exempt and regulate the jurisdiction of the courts. If Congress would only stand up and exercise this power, it would change everything, according to Horowitz. “So the notion that the courts could say, ‘A man is a woman now for purposes of state law; a marriage is not a marriage; you have to fund Planned Parenthood; you can’t regulate abortion clinics’ – they do not have the power to do that if Congress protects the states and simply says no, they do not have the power to adjudicate,” Horowitz declared. Indeed, the notion that one district or circuit judge can redefine marriage or throw out an immigration law is silly, according to Horowitz, because Congress created those courts and has power over their jurisdiction. He acknowledged his book has opened many eyes to the way the judiciary is supposed to work. “A lot of people actually thought the courts are the final arbiter of everything,” Horowitz said. “That’s what even conservatives are trained to think, and this is something that is so dangerous because … there’s got to be some sort of limit to it.” He pointed out early voting was a concept that didn’t exist in most states until about a decade ago, yet federal judges are now ruling that states violate the Constitution and the 1965 Voting Rights Act if they reduce their early voting periods. “How do we allow this to stand for even one day when we have the authority to simply say the courts do not have jurisdiction over this issue?” Horowitz asked. Horowitz lamented conservatives’ unwillingness to embrace drastic but necessary measures to save the American republic. Just as many rejected Levin’s suggestions in “The Liberty Amendments,” some have already rejected Horowitz’s suggestions in “Stolen Sovereignty.” “This is not something foreign,” Horowitz reasoned. “We’re talking about pursuing constitutional remedies to combat unconstitutional coups throughout our government that the left has perpetrated for a hundred years, and our side says no to everything.” Again, Horowitz warned simply appointing more conservative judges has been tried before, and it has failed to fix the systemic problems in the court system. In fact, he said having Congress restrict the courts’ jurisdiction is the one variable Americans have not yet explored. He recommends Congress at minimum strip the courts of jurisdiction over issues of sovereignty, most notably immigration. Such a move would do far more than 10 to 12 years of Republican governance, Horowitz assured Levin’s audience. “We need to do something now, and this notion that we’re going to continue banging our heads against the wall and just say, ‘Appoint better judges,’ this system is so flawed,” Horowitz insisted. “When we have this erroneous notion and we give in to the premise that the courts are not just a coequal branch to engage in judicial review, but they are above, they are the sole and final arbiter of every single important question of our time, we’ve lost our system of governance. It doesn’t matter; it doesn’t matter who wins the elections. I guarantee you – pick your favorite policy, why you want a Republican governor or president – that policy will be thrown out.” Semper Fi !!!
8/11/2016 1:41:13 PM	Here Is A Look Into The Future
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Quote from nycman530:

privatedelight singles

tinder hookups only