Joe Farah is a writer for WND and has some ideas for Trump's first 100 days in office.
I for one would love to see these ideas done in 100 days.It would be a good trick if Trump could get this much done.

Semper Fi !!!

Joseph Farah is a writer for WND.
(WND) – What are the first things Donald Trump should do upon taking the office of the presidency Jan. 20?

Everyone has their ideas.

Here is my top-17 list for the first 100 days:

1. Obamacare needs to be scrapped, dismantled, destroyed and replaced with a system that uses market forces to make health insurance more affordable and available, one without mandates on consumers they don’t need or want. The “experts” will tell you how complicated that is. These are the same “experts” who insisted you could keep your own doctor and your own policy under Obamacare. They are the same “experts” who created a wacky Rube Goldberg-like system designed to fail, designed to drive up the cost of premiums, designed to empower government over consumers.

2. The border needs to sealed – no ifs, ands or buts. It’s time for Trump to make good on his most important promise – the one that got him elected.

3. A review of all globalist trade deals needs to take place quickly, and the stake needs to be put in the hearts of all of them that are not serving the best interests of the American people.

4. Taxes – both personal and corporate – need to be slashed.

5. The Internal Revenue Service needs to be scrapped in favor of a much simpler system not subject to political abuse and one that reduces time-consuming and expensive paperwork to comply.

6. The U.S. military needs to get back to the business of defending the nation and away from acting as the government’s incubator for social experiments involving sex and gender.

7. The late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia needs to be replaced by an equivalent jurist in temperament, intellect and constitutional integrity.

8. Trump should name a commission to investigate glaring shortcomings in our electoral system – from taxpayer campaign financing to the lingering questions still surrounding the constitutional eligibility proofs for president and vice president. With a new forensic investigation of Barack Obama’s so-called “birth certificate” showing it to be a fraudulent document apparently manufactured at his behest, the nation should never be subjected to this kind of embarrassment again.

9. To avoid a looming economic calamity, Trump should have a plan drawn up by his fiscal team to deal with the staggering $20 trillion debt he was left holding the bag with by Obama.

10. Trump should ask Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to draw up a plan to reduce regulation on American consumers and businesses to put people back to work.

11. Of course, overturn all of Obama’s unconstitutional executive orders and presidential directives.

12. Announce that the Trump family will spend their own money on vacations.

13. Appoint a commission to recommend cuts in waste, fraud, abuse and corruption in Washington that leads to legislation providing real protections and incentives for whistleblowers, employees and supervisors who save money and disclose wrongdoing inside the swamp.

14. Evaluate every piece of legislation that hits the Oval Office on the basis of the constitutional test.

15. Carefully evaluate every judicial appointment by the same standard Trump has promised to apply to the Supreme Court nominations.

16. Shake up the White House press corps by overturning the misguided rules of the past that have helped turn the nation’s media into a partisan joke. Invoke drug tests on all reporters,
producers and media crews who enter the White House. Institute a lottery system to determine where correspondents are seated for press conferences. Acknowledge the new stature of the digital media by treating them with as much respect as the old guard media establishment.

17. Start cutting the size and scope of the federal government, encouraging Cabinet secretaries to reduce spending and interference in matters more properly handled by state governments with an eye toward the elimination of the Department of Education and other agencies.

That would be a good start to the New Year. Don’t you think?

When Bill Clinton promised to crack down on illegal immigration, he was cheered. Why is Donald Trump being called a racist for actually doing something about it?
http://townhall.com/…/its-done-trump-signs-executive-orders…

The anger at his new policy is seriously misplaced. President Trump has ordered a temporary, 120-day halt to admitting refugees from seven countries, all of them war-torn states with majority-Muslim populations: Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Sudan, Libya, and Somalia. He has further indicated that, once additional screening provisions are put in place, he wants further refugee admissions from those countries to give priority to Christian refugees over Muslim refugees.

Trump’s order is, in characteristic Trump fashion, both ham-handed and underinclusive, and particularly unfair to allies who risked life and limb to help the American war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. But it is also not the dangerous and radical departure from U.S. policy that his liberal critics make it out to be. His policy may be terrible public relations for the United States, but it is fairly narrow and well within the recent tradition of immigration actions taken by the Obama administration. First, let’s put in context what Trump is actually doing.

The executive order, on its face, does not discriminate between Muslim and Christian (or Jewish) immigrants, and it is far from being a complete ban on Muslim immigrants or even Muslim refugees. Trump’s own stated reason for giving preference to Christian refugees is also worth quoting: Trump was asked whether he would prioritize persecuted Christians in the Middle East for admission as refugees, and he replied, “Yes.” “They’ve been horribly treated,” he said. “Do you know if you were a Christian in Syria it was impossible, at least very tough, to get into the United States?

If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian it was almost impossible. And the reason that was so unfair — everybody was persecuted, in all fairness — but they were chopping off the heads of everybody, but more so the Christians. And I thought it was very, very unfair. “So we are going to help them.” Trump isn’t making this up; Obama-administration policy effectively discriminated against persecuted religious-minority Christians from Syria (even while explicitly admitting that ISIS was pursuing a policy of genocide against Syrian Christians), and the response from most of Trump’s liberal critics has been silence: The United States has accepted 10,801 Syrian refugees, of whom 56 are Christian. Not 56 percent; 56 total, out of 10,801. That is to say, one-half of 1 percent. The BBC says that 10 percent of all Syrians are Christian, which would mean 2.2 million Christians. . . .


Experts say [one] reason for the lack of Christians in the makeup of the refugees is the makeup of the camps. Christians in the main United Nations refugee camp in Jordan are subject to persecution, they say, and so flee the camps, meaning they are not included in the refugees referred to the U.S. by the U.N. “The Christians don’t reside in those camps because it is too dangerous,” [Nina Shea, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom] said. “They are preyed upon by other residents from the Sunni community, and there is infiltration by ISIS and criminal gangs.” “They are raped, abducted into slavery and they are abducted for ransom. It is extremely dangerous; there is not a single Christian in the Jordanian camps for Syrian refugees,” Shea said. Liberals are normally the first people to argue that American policy should give preferential treatment to groups that are oppressed and discriminated against, but because Christians are the dominant religious group here — and the bêtes noires of domestic liberals — there is little liberal interest in accommodating U.S. refugee policy to the reality on the ground in Syria.
So long as Obama could outsource religious discrimination against Christian refugees to Jordan and the U.N., his supporters preferred the status quo to admitting that Trump might have a point. On the whole, 2016 was the first time in a decade when the United States let in more Muslim than Christian refugees, 38,901 overall, 75 percent of them from Syria, Somalia, and Iraq, all countries on Trump’s list — and all countries in which the United States has been actively engaged in drone strikes or ground combat over the past year. Obama had been planning to dramatically expand that number, to 110,000, in 2017 — only after he was safely out of office. This brings us to a broader point: The United States in general, and the Obama administration in particular, never had an open-borders policy for all refugees from everywhere, so overwrought rhetoric about Trump ripping down Lady Liberty’s promise means comparing him to an ideal state that never existed. In fact, the Obama administration completely stopped processing refugees from Iraq for six months in 2011 over concerns about terrorist infiltration, a step nearly identical to Trump’s current order, but one that was met with silence and indifference by most of Trump’s current critics. Only two weeks ago, Obama revoked a decades-old “wet foot, dry foot” policy of allowing entry to refugees from Cuba who made it to our shores. His move, intended to signal an easing of tensions with the brutal Communist dictatorship in Havana, has stranded scores of refugees in Mexico and Central America, and Mexico last Friday deported the first 91 of them to Cuba. This, too, has no claim on the conscience of Trump’s liberal critics. After all, Cuban Americans tend to vote Republican.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444373/donald-trump-refugees-critics-wrong

Donald Trump Threatens to Cancel Berkeley Federal Funds After Riots Shut Down Milo Event

A fire set by demonstrators protesting a scheduled speaking appearance by Breitbart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos burns on Sproul Plaza on the University of California at Berkeley campus on Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2017, in Berkeley, Calif. The event was cancelled due to size of the crowd and several fires being set. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)
by CHARLIE SPIERING 2 Feb 2017


President Donald Trump reacted to the massive rioting at UC-Berkeley in response to a scheduled campus speech by Breitbart News editor Milo Yiannopoulos.
“If U.C. Berkeley does not allow free speech and practices violence on innocent people with a different point of view – NO FEDERAL FUNDS?” Trump wrote on Twitter early Thursday morning.

News of the rioting made cable news last night as students smashed ATMs and bank windows, looted a Starbucks, beat Trump supporters, pepper sprayed innocent individuals, and set fires in the street. Others spray painted the words “Kill Trump” on storefronts.

The speech was canceled by UC-Berkeley police as security failed. Yiannopoulos was evacuated from the area.

“The left is profoundly antithetical to free speech these days, does not want to hear alternative points of view, and will do anything to shut it down,” Yiannopoulos told Fox News host Tucker Carlson in an interview on Wednesday night. “My point is being proven over and over and over again.”

Over 95% have no regrets on voting for Trump but less than 40% are disappointed in his success thus far. Now he moved the wall over to the fall vote to get the budget passed and avoid a filibuster. Damned Schummer. How OLD is that fart?

Nothing passed in the legislature. I see bickering and stalemates.