WOW GOP's Taking soros Money

2/6/2017 10:45:41 AM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 67, joined Nov. 2007	Below is just part of the list of people who benefit from the sorass machine.soros needs a rope and a tree. Semper Fi !!! Everyone knows about the tens of millions of dollars various George Soros front groups poured into Hillary Clinton’s failed presidential efforts in 2016, but the Republicans he supported – from Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan and his predecessor, John Boehner, have received less attention. Republican presidential candidate John Kasich was also a big recipient of Soros largesse – to the tune at least $202,700. That makes Soros one of the Kasich presidential campaign’s top funders. While the Soros Fund Management, just one of the Hungarian billionaire’s political tentacles, spent $224,300 on Democratic Party congressional campaigns in 2016, it also spent $31,400 on Republicans, including $10,800 on Ryan – the most of any member of the GOP, the same as it invested in Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, a Democrat. Other GOP congressional recipients of Soros contributions include Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., ($2,500); Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla. ($2,700); Rep. Joe Heck, R-Nev. ($2,700); Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio ($2,600); Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif. ($2,500); Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla. ($1,000); Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa ($1,000); Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis. ($1,000); Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash. ($1,000); and Rep. Dan Donovan, R-N.Y. ($300). Soros has aided hundreds of left-wing groups since 2000 under the auspices of his Open Society Foundations promoting environmental activism, gun control, immigration groups, opposition to voter ID laws and anti-police groups like Black Lives Matter. In one year, Soros funding of at least $33 million helped persuade the public that Michael Brown was murdered by a police officer in the city of Ferguson, Missouri. “The intense anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric that has been fueled by the Republican primary is deeply offensive,” Soros said in the statement during the 2016 campaign. “There should be consequences for the outrageous statements and proposals that we’ve regularly heard from candidates (Donald) Trump and (Ted) Cruz.” Michael Vachon, a spokesman and political adviser to Soros, said there was no single cause for the increase in spending. “His support of Clinton is one reason,” he said. “The tone of the other candidates is the other. Soros’ personal fortune stands at about $24 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Soros handed off day-to-day management of his hedge-fund business in the late 1980s to focus on his charitable pursuits, many of which seek to promote democracy around the world. The Open Society Foundations say they have spent some $13 billion over the past three decades. Soros organizations have also donated between $1.5 million and $6 million to the Clinton Foundation. wnd.com/2017/02/12-top-republicans-backed-by-soros-in-2016 Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
2/6/2017 3:35:26 PM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
rcrmike Souderton, PA 59, joined Apr. 2009	Hey Tileman and all my friends. My little opinionated reply covers some of this and more to think about. I hope I don't hijack the topic. All of these subjects tend to overlap and bleed to other areas. I wrote this this morning for someone else and thought it would be of interest to my friend here. Sorry to be away so long. -------------------------------- I'm worried for Trump. The election isn't over yet. It's just switching game plans and priorities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-8iaJTC5jk Hillary & green screens? You can view dozens of suggested videos and articles, but this one serves my point. There are soooooo many unanswered questions. At the end, I have a crazy suggestion. 1. Who was Trump's real opponent? It wasn't Hillary! We know she's a Soros stooge. But for who else? 2. After watching the video, and many others, WHO fabricated all this amateurish fakery? 3. How much money was spent to insert a flawed, in so many ways, candidate? 4. If her health was in question, they could've gone with Bernie at the primary, but didn't. WHY? 5. If they knew her health, WHY did they follow through? Was it their scheme to HAVE a comatosed President? 6. How could the DNC NOT know what we do? 7. How could the GOP NOT know what we do? 8. How could the media NOT know what we do? (Stupid question, they know!) 9. How could the ENTIRE Congress NOT Know what we do? ...and 17 corrupt Intelligence Agencies too? 10. How could independent election committees of 50 states NOT know what we do? 11. How could ALL the private rally venues NOT know what we do? 12. Who are all these people participating? 13. What about the event organizers, staff, vendors, and supporters? Didn't one person question anything? 14. They were caught in corruption at the DNC primary, and NOTHING came of it. (Brain-dead supporters.) 15. The Wikileaks email documents were never refuted, and NOTHING happened. All that is now old news. Back to question #1. Who is Trump still up against? Somebody went to enormous lengths to win an election, and DIDN'T! They haven't gone on vacation. This is a massive well-funded organization with a mission still to achieve. They haven't thrown up their hands and proclaimed, "Oh well, we didn't win, better luck next time"! This is one huge invisible Black Program!!! SandyHook on steroids. Have we noticed that the election wasn't over in November? Ever since Trump won, immediately there were "obviously organized" and simultaneous "organic grassroots" petitions and protests to remove him. For what? Still going on. Whoever these people are, they never skipped a beat. They do not want Trump to stay. The ongoing protests and violence is nothing like we would expect for any election. If the bad haircut North Korean himself had stolen our election, there wouldn't be this much turmoil. There weren't any significant protests when Little Barry was anointed. Something doesn't smell right. I'm obviously skeptical, and the entire process has piqued my curiosity. Too many unanswered questions, but mostly, who should WE trust? The Executive and Legislative branches have excluded themselves from credibility. The Judicial branch appears to be silent too. However the Judicial ONLY speaks when something is brought to them. They did sidestep Little Barry's eligibility though. Surprising that 17 intelligence agencies are also silent. Why do we need them? Who are they working for? Who exactly is "THEY", that I keep referring to? That's OUR main problem/question/answer! I am concerned about what this mysterious entity has for a backup plan. Expect some bizarre surprise. ----------------------- I just proof-read my rant. It occurred to me, we might live in a banana republic third world country. It's a big one, and has lots of money and technology, but still corrupt. Sad but true. After all these questions, I understand why Trump is moving so swiftly. He needs to dig up and expose these invisible moles before they get to him. He has stirred up a hornets nest. The federal reserve attack is not just another issue. It's the cash lifeline to most of the international corruption. He needs 100% of America's support to stand up to the NWO, all of us, even the dumbed-down liberals. The Liberals need to know where their tax money has gone. Many of those things they say they care about. Will they listen? We need the Dems. Without them, we will continue to be a divided nation. Notice Trump hasn't insulted them. They may be dumb, but they stick together no matter what! We need them to SEE our common Global enemy. Only a fully united America can win this progressive Globalist takeover. Just like WWII. We had a singular purpose. This time, the modern silent war has come to our homeland. This one can be won without firing a shot. Doesn't mean it's not a war. (I am guessing that the Dems are about 40% or less of America, given the fake and embellished election results. I've recently heard that some Dems are converting. What have some experienced to do that?) ------------------------------------------- Here we go about Putin. He has singularly taken on the NWO and bankers. He has arrest warrants for Soros. He is going after ISIS. How does that saying go? "The enemy of my enemy is my friend"! Doesn't mean we are required to invite him into our homes for dinner. America and Russia don't have to give up anything to the other, just NOT fight each other! Simple and inexpensive! The USA, Russia, possibly the newly freed Great Britain can stop this Globalist nonsense, by taking them on from all sides. Others will jump on-board when they see the Superpowers are cooperating. The European Union will collapse and each country rebound overnight. The entire Middle East and NK will cave-in or become USA and Russian territories. Share the victory, go home, and mind our own business. Open up trade and travel. Everyone wins. Again, not one shot needs to be fired. Just place the Globalists, Middle East, and North Korea on notice. "Don't screw with us"! If a show of force is necessary, take the oil and all the sands of Iran and burn the see-eye-aye poppy fields in Afghanistan. The Chinese, SK, and Japan will then take care of Bad Haircut Kimmy. DONE! NATO and the UN are the main part of Globalism and NOT part of this theoretical correction. Once America removes our funding, they're both toast! All dressed up and nowhere to go! I still need to know who is hidden inside OUR government right now. They are more dangerous than ISIS and Little Kimmy. What do you think? Maybe I am missing something.
2/7/2017 10:02:14 AM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 67, joined Nov. 2007	Mike,you lay this out very well and is definitely food for thought.All of the points you bring up need to be investigated two their end and then action needs to be taken eliminate the problem and measures need to be put in place to insure that it never happens again. We have a long road to hoe to get a firm handle on this. Semper Fi !!!
2/7/2017 12:50:36 PM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
shawnee_b Edmonton, KY 63, joined Apr. 2010	I think we may see some changes now. Things investigated that should be.
2/7/2017 1:50:06 PM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
stargazzer Creighton, NE 69, joined Feb. 2007	They are with vareations Progressive Communist. Some are Facist, same train on two diferant rails, Most have Embraced Climate Change in one name or others as a way to tax to world domanation. I do hesate to call The repulican Rino's Communist But they do work together through One world Order & Climate change, none are good for anyone but the top 5% of the wealth. Together they have a lot of usfull idiots that do not know anything to disrupt the political prosess But basicly it is Communist, Fasist & or Globalist And their has come to be a lot of them
2/7/2017 1:57:35 PM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
stargazzer Creighton, NE 69, joined Feb. 2007	They are with vareations Progressive Communist. Some are Facist, same train on two diferant rails, Most have Embraced Climate Change in one name or others as a way to tax to world domanation. I do hesate to call The repulican Rino's Communist But they do work together through One world Order & Climate change, none are good for anyone but the top 5% of the wealth. Together they have a lot of usfull idiots that do not know anything to disrupt the political prosess But basicly it is Communist, Fasist & or Globalist And their has come to be a lot of them
2/7/2017 3:35:37 PM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 67, joined Nov. 2007	Quote from stargazzer: They are with vareations Progressive Communist. Some are Facist, same train on two diferant rails, Most have Embraced Climate Change in one name or others as a way to tax to world domanation. I do hesate to call The repulican Rino's Communist But they do work together through One world Order & Climate change, none are good for anyone but the top 5% of the wealth. Together they have a lot of usfull idiots that do not know anything to disrupt the political prosess But basicly it is Communist, Fasist & or Globalist And their has come to be a lot of them Hey Star,Check this out. Semper Fi !!! A whistleblower says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) rushed a landmark study claiming the planet was warming much faster than expected in order to influence international climate negotiations. Dr. John Bates, the former principal scientist at the National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, N.C., told the Daily Mail NOAA’s 2015 study was meant “to discredit the notion of a global warming hiatus and rush to time the publication of the paper to influence national and international deliberations on climate policy.” Bates said NOAA scientists made a “blatant attempt to intensify the impact” of global warming to eliminate the “pause” in temperature rise since 1998. The Daily Mail claims Bates showed it “irrefutable” evidence NOAA’s study relied on “unverified” data. Bates’ objections to the paper were ignored by his superiors, who let scientists make “decisions and scientific choices that maximised warming and minimised documentation” in advance of a major United Nations climate summit in Paris, France. His statement to The Daily Mail comes amid an investigation into the NOAA study by House Republicans on the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Texas Rep. Lamar Smith, the committee’s chairman, subpoenaed NOAA in late 2015 for records related to the so-called “Karl study” that adjusted global sea surface temperature upwards, eliminating the “pause” in global warming since 1998. Smith was heavily ridiculed for subpoenaing NOAA scientists, and the agency refused to hand over any internal deliberations of the “Karl study.” The study’s lead author, Tom Karl, has since left NOAA. “Dr. Bates’ revelations and NOAA’s obstruction certainly lend credence to what I’ve expected all along – that the Karl study used flawed data, was rushed to publication in an effort to support the president’s climate change agenda, and ignored NOAA’s own standards for scientific study,” Smith said in a statement on The Daily Mail’s story. “The Committee thanks Dr. Bates, a Department of Commerce Gold Medal winner for creating and implementing a standard to produce and preserve climate data, for exposing the previous administration’s efforts to push their costly climate agenda at the expense of scientific integrity,” Smith said. Scientists have been debating over the so-called “pause” in global warming since at least 2013, referring to the period from 1998 to 2014 without any significant rise in global average temperature. The Karl study made changes to historical sea surface temperature records, effectively doubling the warming trend of that period to 0.086 degrees Celsius per decade from 0.039 degrees per decade. Karl’s study was welcomed by some scientists and environmentalists who see man-made global warming as the biggest threat to humanity; it was criticized by others in the scientific community. Climate scientist Judith Curry, formerly of Georgia Tech, wrote at the time that NOAA excluded extremely accurate sea buoy data in order to erase the hiatus in warming. Curry wrote that it “seems rather ironic, since this is the period where there is the greatest coverage of data with the highest quality of measurements — ARGO buoys and satellites don’t show a warming trend.” But the Karl study may have had deeper problems. It was based on two “flawed” temperature datasets, Bates told The Daily Mail. NOAA has now “decided that the sea dataset will have to be replaced and substantially revised just 18 months after it was issued, because it used unreliable methods which overstated the speed of warming,” The Daily Mail learned. NOAA’s revised data will show “lower temperatures and a slower rate in the recent warming trend.” The “land temperature dataset used by the study was afflicted by devastating bugs in its software that rendered its findings ‘unstable,’” and based on an “alpha” version that was never verified. It still hasn’t been approved. “None of the data on which the paper was based was properly ‘archived’ – a mandatory requirement meant to ensure that raw data and the software used to process it is accessible to other scientists, so they can verify NOAA results,” The Daily Mail reported. dailycallernewsfoundation.org/2017/02/05/
2/7/2017 5:47:16 PM	WOW GOP's Taking soros Money
caressmybreasts Gresham, OR 47, joined Dec. 2016	Soros is behind all the lawsuits being filed against trump

rubmaps con

rubmaps con