|
www skipthegamesAnd a single demands sign up new FB and new acc. datehookup discontinued Thanks to these romantic platforms, you can scroll by means of a pool of prospective partners on your telephone, looking for the great date. • We staff moderators in this chat space, but they cannot be on every single minute of the day. sensual chocolate quotes In some strategies, Yahoo chat rooms were wilder than the predictable, vanilla, regulated dating apps of right now. lesbian hookup app freeThe great advantage is that you can share problems and celebrate results and joy collectively. temecula personals The key drawback with the site is that the matching technique itself is a bit lacking. A chat is full of positive aspects if you assume about it! fit russian girls With so a lot of men and women utilizing the online to locate dates and make new pals, how can you make certain things are accomplished in a way that s comfortable and protected? These tips may well be good to believe about as you take those 1st methods in connecting on the internet. Home Sign In Search Date Ideas Join Forums Singles Groups - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!
12/2/2011 4:36:18 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
A wealthy friend of mine and I were talking today about the protests. We generally agree that the folks in these protests would be better served by using their time more wisely in doing something else to improve their lives. But we also got in to why. Why would these folks protest. And we got into historical discussion about the economic equality gap thoughout history. And how today in some countries the wealthy have to have armed guards that escort them from wealthy enclave to another.\
Truth is there is a income disparity. The wealthy have made the most money over the past 30 years. Todays ceo is makes 475 times what he average employee makes. The people we send to congress are bought and paid for by the highest bidder at democracys auction block.
I do not like what I have heard at alot of these protests. I heard one chick saying that everyone should make the same amount of money.....No princess thats communism and it don't work. But at the same time folks in the middle have got to make more money.
The biggest thing my friend and I agree on is the reason we are successful is we come from a society that made it possible for us to get an education. And made it possible for others to get educations. And we have a country that our grandparents and their grandparents sacrificed for and built. And alot of people who don't make as much as us still believe in what we're selling enough to make us what we are.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A SELF-MADE MAN!!! The society we come from made us. Most people have the amount of drive to be successful. The fact is some of us are lucky. I said it. LucK!! right place at the right time, being giving the right tools and somehow getting lucky enough to have the right connections means you'll be well to do if not wealthy.
I just landed a huge contract, not because im that good. A man at a gas station saw signs on my truck. Struck up a conversation with me. Next thing I know next year my company is doing a 2 million dollar project. Thats not because im good. Thats luck. And pissing on people that played by the rules and just want a job and a decent life is immoral. And those who think otherwise are just wrong and misguided.
Those of us who are lucky need to step up and put some of these people to work. If not our kids will be have to have body guards too! And thats not the country I wanna live in nor the country I will tolerate. Believe me, there folks like me with the means and the will and the desire. The middle will be defended!
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
12/2/2011 7:12:30 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
queenofhearts61
Seymour, IN
72, joined Mar. 2007
|
Drew the fact is that the 1% do not live among us like they used to. When I was young the rich people in town lived in neighborhoods with other people around now they live in gated communities with guards and their properties are guarded too. As they get their money and a lot at times not totally honestly, they suspect everyone wants to take it from them because they think everyone is as lacking integrity as they are so they trust no one and do not mix with the 'unwashed masses'. The further they get out of regular society the more they fear and become totally unconnected from them.
People who have money assuming that all others want to take it from them is not true of most people. I also believe that not everyone wants to be rich. I have never really wanted the problems of being rich. There are a lot of expectations and a lot of fear of losing it. I do not like to stand out in a crowd, having everyone know who I am, as I am a private person and like to be left alone.
But you are right about having to have guards everywhere because in times like these people just want an opportunity to earn a decent wage and not wonder from day to day if you are gonna have enough to eat or have to beg for help for the first time in their lives. It is unnatural to just lay down and die because you are poor and at some point the masses are going to rise up as they have throughout history you find this to be true.
Some people do nothing but acquire money beyond anything they could ever spend. Some say that they are going to leave to their children but if you check the history of the very rich, their children often do not do very well. They have no compassion and often kill others in their families to get at the money. Often it is not beneficial for those children.
|
12/2/2011 9:35:31 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
Well I'm not that rich. But whatever I have if my kids (and ill know if they arent) arent of good moral character ill give all the money to charity. But we shouldn't get into hypothetical situations within a wealthy family. Thats their business anyway.
However, if you look at other countries with a huge gap between rich and poor, the rich have to sleep with one open so to speak. To be honest.....I don't wanna live in a place like that. And I don't forget who helped me get to where I am. Most of the people thats helped me along by hiring me to do stuff for them are middle income people.
Not that I don't have wealthy clients too, but the broad based middle class is a huge market. A middle class with disposable income makes other people rich that otherwise wouldn't ever be rich. A middle class that has access to education and a decent income creates opportunities that are the envy of the world. The middle class is something that the poor that so many demean can look to as an example and as a goal to get to.
I was poor when I was growing up, and what we see as middle class now I thought was rich. I never seen what rich really was. But what I thought was rich, I knew that I could achieve if I worked hard and was smart with my money. But now the majority of the income going to the top its leaving the middle class in tatters.
When the middle class does well everyone does well. A friend of mine asked me "drew, tell me something? Would you rather pay 40% taxes and have a 2005 or 2006 economy or would you rather pay 20% taxes in a 2010-2011 economy? I told him hands down I'd rather pay 40% in the better economy. Because, if my taxes are keeping our debt down. If we have a relatively strong currency, People will have more money to spend and Ill make more money anyway. And believe me I have proof to back this up.
It's the sheer greed of a few who this economy works for that thats standing in the way of prosperity for the rest.
And honestly....those folks would still do just as well if not better. So, I can't help but wonder if its about more than money. If a small group controls all the wealth, they have all the power. A small group of people can control an entire country who's economy is based on capitalism when they control the wealth.
Now, I am not for wealth redistribution. If anyone has ever read my posts I have a distinct distain for giving people money just for the hell of it. Even the needy. Its a waste if not used in constructive ways. ie...parable give a man a fish feed him for a day, teach him to fish feed him for life....and I'm not happy with giving people back more than they paid in taxes.
People who are money motivated create growth....But ya know what if that money motivation has grown to where the only way someone will create a job is if you give them rediculous tax cuts that hurt the country, then f*** em. I like making money, but you dont have to kiss my a** to create a job. Those people make me money, and I appreciate those who work for me. If all these people around me have more money and decent jobs they'll spend more and Ill make more.
But I'm not attacking wealthy people, I believe the vast majority share my view. And the people that don't share my view are people who someday "plan on being rich" but because of the environment that the people they support have created and the idiots they keep voting for they'll be lucky to make ends meet.
As a country it seems like we can't see the forest for the trees and we're cutting our collective nose off to spite our face. And its foolish.
|
12/4/2011 11:41:53 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Sorry, I hae to disagree:
"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A SELF-MADE MAN!!! The society we come from made us. Most people have the amount of drive to be successful. The fact is some of us are lucky. I said it. LucK!! right place at the right time, being giving the right tools and somehow getting lucky enough to have the right connections means you'll be well to do if not wealthy.
I just landed a huge contract, not because im that good. A man at a gas station saw signs on my truck. Struck up a conversation with me. Next thing I know next year my company is doing a 2 million dollar project. Thats not because im good. Thats luck. And pissing on people that played by the rules and just want a job and a decent life is immoral. And those who think otherwise are just wrong and misguided."
There are many self-made men and women. In fact every man and woman is "self-made". They make themselves rich, and poor, and educated or not, regardless of their profession as a CEO, janitor, tradesman, laborer, teacher, scientist, doctor, or whatever. No one else made them do anything. Whatever they did to become whatever they becamse was up to them, so by definition everyone is self made. Any phychologist will tell you that no one can make you do anything.
Think it's all about luck? Landing the contract was lucky? How so? You did have the forsight to put signs on your truck didn't you? Was that luck? did the signs magically appear like queens facts? Or did you spend money on that and do it on purpose hoping and maybe even expecting it work exactly as it did? Hmmm. I don't think you give yourself enough credit. If you hadn't put the sign on there the converstation likely would never have started and you wouldn't have even known about the work.
|
12/4/2011 3:34:26 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
it was luck. yeah I have good forsight to advertise and market my company. But being some place as random as a gas station and just happening to run into someone who gives me that size of contract.....idk maybe its fates way of giving back to me for all the hell Ive been thru getting here...but my point being is there are lots of people who work hard and do the right things with their money and still have trouble getting anywhere.
early on there were times i didn't go home from work. Id have a big project Id work 18 hrs sleep for 5 hours in the truck then get going again. 6am to 12am....I am being rewarded for my hard work. but im not blind I see others who do the same thing and because of the system and the way things are going they never gain any traction. Thats what I'm fighting against. Im opposing the conditions that make it harder and sometimes impossible to get ahead. And honestly, I'm not a partisan person in the sense I really don't give a damn about whats democrat or republican or liberal or conservative. If i see stuff going on that I do not like it pisses me off reguardless of who is pushing it.
So, the reason I can sympathize with the ows movement on some issues there is some validity to them.....
Getting money out of politics
Upset because hard work isn't rewarded anymore....however investment is
The fact the 1% gets bailed out and the 99% pay it.
Theres alot of things that aren't sitting well with alot of people. If you research this and really get into whos really down there and who is protesting its not just hairy dirty druged up hippies.....its alot of middle income people. and of course students. If there wasn't real problems with this system the middle class wouldn't give up the comfort of their homes to protest...Ah hell Idk.
|
12/4/2011 4:46:24 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
betterwithme
Severy, KS
62, joined Dec. 2009
|
it was luck. yeah I have good forsight to advertise and market my company. But being some place as random as a gas station and just happening to run into someone who gives me that size of contract.....idk maybe its fates way of giving back to me for all the hell Ive been thru getting here...but my point being is there are lots of people who work hard and do the right things with their money and still have trouble getting anywhere.
early on there were times i didn't go home from work. Id have a big project Id work 18 hrs sleep for 5 hours in the truck then get going again. 6am to 12am....I am being rewarded for my hard work. but im not blind I see others who do the same thing and because of the system and the way things are going they never gain any traction. Thats what I'm fighting against. Im opposing the conditions that make it harder and sometimes impossible to get ahead. And honestly, I'm not a partisan person in the sense I really don't give a damn about whats democrat or republican or liberal or conservative. If i see stuff going on that I do not like it pisses me off reguardless of who is pushing it.
So, the reason I can sympathize with the ows movement on some issues there is some validity to them.....
Getting money out of politics
Upset because hard work isn't rewarded anymore....however investment is
The fact the 1% gets bailed out and the 99% pay it.
Theres alot of things that aren't sitting well with alot of people. If you research this and really get into whos really down there and who is protesting its not just hairy
Get money out of politics - DC has been promising that for generations.
Hard work is rewarding for those who bother to stick with it.
The 99 bailing out the 1's - then they need to be protesting DC not WS. The 1% would not have recieved the bail out if the government did not want to. So really, who fault is it. Did you ever get all the toys you asked Santa for?
dirty druged up hippies.....its alot of middle income people. and of course students. If there wasn't real problems with this system the middle class wouldn't give up the comfort of their homes to protest...Ah hell Idk.
|
12/4/2011 8:15:28 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Could have been a mini mart, could hae been the grocery store, could have been at church, anywhere. Doesn't make it luck, just makes it another place. The place is irrelevant.
|
12/6/2011 11:48:41 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
thenelly
Topeka, KS
47, joined Nov. 2011
|
If Bill Gates or Warren Buffet each paid one (1) dollar in taxes last year, it would be more than 51% of the people in this country that file a return. Remember that the next time you want to complain about who pays taxes and who doesn't. It is so typical of the socialist freaks to expect a gift of taxes when they pay none themselves.
Who challenges The Snake?
|
12/6/2011 4:49:58 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
I challenge the snake!! I'm not talking about the people who pay nothing in taxes. I'm talking about the middle class family who pays 28% of the their money in taxes but warren buffet (and he has even came out and said) he paid 17% in taxes. He has said he should be paying more in taxes. I have never said its okay for poor folks to get more taxes than they paid in. What I am saying however the system now as it is setup, is setup to favor the wealthiest people.
As a percentage, I pay less than folks who work for me. It's wrong. And as far as creating jobs, you don't have to kiss my a** or let me rob the treasury by not paying my fair share for me to create a job. I need an increase in aggregate demand. Not a tax break. Heres why:
** I didn't get to the place Im at by just spending money. So im not going to create a new job because you give me a tax break. I'm going to say thanks for the free money and Ill probably not spend that extra money either.
Thats why tax breaks for the rich don't work....and if they are...please tell me how?
However give it to middle class, theyll spend it. Thatll create jobs and lots of them. And since their spending money they'll create more rich people.
Look heres the deal, with wealth comes responsiblity. And part of being responsible is paying your fair share. And trust me, I have the right to say this. I know what is it looks like and the rest of the country is getting fleeced.
|
12/6/2011 7:33:14 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
I challenge the snake!! I'm not talking about the people who pay nothing in taxes. I'm talking about the middle class family who pays 28% of the their money in taxes but warren buffet (and he has even came out and said) he paid 17% in taxes. He has said he should be paying more in taxes. I have never said its okay for poor folks to get more taxes than they paid in. What I am saying however the system now as it is setup, is setup to favor the wealthiest people.
As a percentage, I pay less than folks who work for me. It's wrong. And as far as creating jobs, you don't have to kiss my a** or let me rob the treasury by not paying my fair share for me to create a job. I need an increase in aggregate demand. Not a tax break. Heres why:
** I didn't get to the place Im at by just spending money. So im not going to create a new job because you give me a tax break. I'm going to say thanks for the free money and Ill probably not spend that extra money either.
Thats why tax breaks for the rich don't work....and if they are...please tell me how?
However give it to middle class, theyll spend it. Thatll create jobs and lots of them. And since their spending money they'll create more rich people.
Look heres the deal, with wealth comes responsiblity. And part of being responsible is paying your fair share. And trust me, I have the right to say this. I know what is it looks like and the rest of the country is getting fleeced.
OK, let's try this: Let everyone pay. Nobody gets a free ride, nobody gets money they didn't pay in, just go flat on income no matter now much anyone makes they allpay exactly the same pecent. Currently the IRS returns half the money collected to people that paid nothing in. That needs to stop.
Buffet pays 15% on capital gains because most of his income is long term investment income. Everyone pays 15% on stock sale profits if the stock held longer than one year. If they hold the stock less than a year they pay whatever their income tax rate is. For me with state and federal that is 33%.
That myth about him paying less than his secretary is crap. Even in that case the secretary would pay much less in total dollars than the millions he pays on his investment returns. It might be possible if his secreatry earned enough that the secretary paid a higher percentage because of the difference between income tax rates (28%) and capital gains rates (15%), but there is no way he pays less total dollars than his secretary. It's a play on words. When he said more he did not specify how much money, he was referring to the tax rate.
It is another myth created by a play on words and less than the full story.
|
12/7/2011 7:10:17 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
betterwithme
Severy, KS
62, joined Dec. 2009
|
So Queen when is OWS going to preotest Barney Frank and him not "overseeing" congress's insider trading that took 60 minutes to exspose. When Queen, When? If you want the 1%, there they aree, all in one house.
|
12/7/2011 8:51:10 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
So Queen when is OWS going to preotest Barney Frank and him not "overseeing" congress's insider trading that took 60 minutes to exspose. When Queen, When? If you want the 1%, there they aree, all in one house.
Nothing to expose. It's been "exposed" numerous times and is perfectly legal. The is no law against it. It is broader than the stock market. A Illinios Congressman made millions buying and selling land in his wife's name because he had inside knowledge if exactly where a highway to nowhere was going while he served on the transportation committee. It is all perfectly legal for them, though similar activities in the private sector will get you prison time.
|
12/7/2011 9:54:30 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
betterwithme
Severy, KS
62, joined Dec. 2009
|
Nothing to expose. It's been "exposed" numerous times and is perfectly legal. The is no law against it. It is broader than the stock market. A Illinios Congressman made millions buying and selling land in his wife's name because he had inside knowledge if exactly where a highway to nowhere was going while he served on the transportation committee. It is all perfectly legal for them, though similar activities in the private sector will get you prison time.
And this is why this OWS is a F-ing joke. It was started under and is being run by the DNC's arm but from under the table. I don't give a damn what Queen and the ows bozo's say, their are just a bunch of brain numb sheep being USED by the dem's to do their dirty work, including that stupid a** brown clown that does not that the guts to do himself. These idiot ows fools have so bought into this class warfare it is embarressing even for me who is not involved. I'm so glad I live in a town that does not buy into this foolishness.
|
12/7/2011 10:58:07 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
OK, let's try this: Let everyone pay. Nobody gets a free ride, nobody gets money they didn't pay in, just go flat on income no matter now much anyone makes they allpay exactly the same pecent. Currently the IRS returns half the money collected to people that paid nothing in. That needs to stop.
Buffet pays 15% on capital gains because most of his income is long term investment income. Everyone pays 15% on stock sale profits if the stock held longer than one year. If they hold the stock less than a year they pay whatever their income tax rate is. For me with state and federal that is 33%.
That myth about him paying less than his secretary is crap. Even in that case the secretary would pay much less in total dollars than the millions he pays on his investment returns. It might be possible if his secreatry earned enough that the secretary paid a higher percentage because of the difference between income tax rates (28%) and capital gains rates (15%), but there is no way he pays less total dollars than his secretary. It's a play on words. When he said more he did not specify how much money, he was referring to the tax rate.
It is another myth created by a play on words and less than the full story.
yes, he was referring as a percentage he pays less. This is true for alot of the wealthier people. And what I'm saying is giving the middle class tax breaks will stimulate the economy, because thats where the largest amount of demand comes from. And as far as making the poorest people pay taxes im against it....heres why, the way the system is set up if they had to pay taxes and that was taken into account it would make public welfare programs availbable to more people. In the end it would cost us more money because sure the federal govt collected some tax dollars but now this persons getting medicaid and food stamps and now maybe section 8.
you have to think through these things.
|
12/7/2011 6:24:07 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
yes, he was referring as a percentage he pays less. This is true for alot of the wealthier people. And what I'm saying is giving the middle class tax breaks will stimulate the economy, because thats where the largest amount of demand comes from. And as far as making the poorest people pay taxes im against it....heres why, the way the system is set up if they had to pay taxes and that was taken into account it would make public welfare programs availbable to more people. In the end it would cost us more money because sure the federal govt collected some tax dollars but now this persons getting medicaid and food stamps and now maybe section 8.
you have to think through these things.
Yes, you have to think through them. You have to think beyond bandaids and get to the heart of the problem.
Poor people getting money for anything and middle class tax cuts create inflation faster than they can keep up with it. Because there is no real money to pay for these things, the government prints money. The more they print the less it is worth (inflation).
Then they have to give poor people more of the less valuable money and any tax breaks to the "middle class" go up in the smoke raised by the very same inflation. The "rich" are already paying over 90% of the money collected in taxes. Collecting more money from them doesn't sovlve anything because if you took all their money it wouldn't be enough to make a even a tiny dent in the debt this drunken government is creating.
Thinking it through a little more, lets reduce this to the lowest denominator. The answer is easy...stop printing money, stop paying people to sit around, stop spending what you don't have and things will eventually catch up and be normal.
A dollar a week would feed a large family in 1930 America. The same family costs over $200 a week to feed today. Why? Inflation.
Government monetary policy is to spend more and print more and all it does is kick the can down the road without helping anyone. The problem is they kick it faster than anyone can run to catch up with it. That results in the suffering of the middle class. It has nothing to do with rich or poor or taxes. It has to do with spending. Period.
|
12/7/2011 7:23:32 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
Yes, you have to think through them. You have to think beyond bandaids and get to the heart of the problem.
Poor people getting money for anything and middle class tax cuts create inflation faster than they can keep up with it. Because there is no real money to pay for these things, the government prints money. The more they print the less it is worth (inflation).
Then they have to give poor people more of the less valuable money and any tax breaks to the "middle class" go up in the smoke raised by the very same inflation. The "rich" are already paying over 90% of the money collected in taxes. Collecting more money from them doesn't sovlve anything because if you took all their money it wouldn't be enough to make a even a tiny dent in the debt this drunken government is creating.
Thinking it through a little more, lets reduce this to the lowest denominator. The answer is easy...stop printing money, stop paying people to sit around, stop spending what you don't have and things will eventually catch up and be normal.
A dollar a week would feed a large family in 1930 America. The same family costs over $200 a week to feed today. Why? Inflation.
Government monetary policy is to spend more and print more and all it does is kick the can down the road without helping anyone. The problem is they kick it faster than anyone can run to catch up with it. That results in the suffering of the middle class. It has nothing to do with rich or poor or taxes. It has to do with spending. Period.
well we agree on one thing. the fed needs to stop printing money. youre right about that.... we clearly disagree on somethings here, however I wonder if the reason the fed is printing the amount of money they are is because of the debt. Think about it. If inflation sets in and drives up the cost of everything eventually pay has to rise as well. which means more tax dollars collected on the higher income (even though it buys the same amount or less of goods and services)... if we have to pay yesterdays debt ie. 15tillion with tommorrows inflated money, doesn't it seem like that number isn't as bad as it seems? well not to us but to the govt
|
12/8/2011 5:48:40 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
queenofhearts61
Seymour, IN
72, joined Mar. 2007
|
The banks getting printed money in amount of $7.7 trillion is more than has ever been spent on the poor altogether. But it is easy to blame the most vulnerable in our society for all of our problems than to attack those who have money behind their stealing America's future. Be proud be very proud.
|
12/8/2011 7:14:40 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
well we agree on one thing. the fed needs to stop printing money. youre right about that.... we clearly disagree on somethings here, however I wonder if the reason the fed is printing the amount of money they are is because of the debt. Think about it. If inflation sets in and drives up the cost of everything eventually pay has to rise as well. which means more tax dollars collected on the higher income (even though it buys the same amount or less of goods and services)... if we have to pay yesterdays debt ie. 15tillion with tommorrows inflated money, doesn't it seem like that number isn't as bad as it seems? well not to us but to the govt
Inflation dilutes the returns on investment. When that is happening, people don't invest. If people don't invest there is no growth. No growth, no new jobs. We have to create a couple hundred thousand new jobs a month to keep people employed. As long as the government keeps inflating currency no one can make a return on investment. So they don't invest. It is like people with under-water on mortgages. They either abandon them or stick it out and hope that by the time they die their house is worth what they paid for it. Inflation is the enemy of growth without which an economy cannot provide for the people that depend on it.
|
12/9/2011 8:39:06 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
Sane monetary policy along with middle class tax relief we would see a recovery.
|
12/9/2011 9:56:42 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Sane monetary policy along with middle class tax relief we would see a recovery.
We won't see any meaningful recovery until governments all over the world stop spending money they don't have. They have promised too much to too many and don't have the money to pay up. Until they are all bailed out, and the only way to do that is stop spending, there can't be a recovery.
|
12/9/2011 1:00:42 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
betterwithme
Severy, KS
62, joined Dec. 2009
|
Hey Queen, one more death in OWS VT. Shot himself.
|
12/9/2011 4:53:48 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
We won't see any meaningful recovery until governments all over the world stop spending money they don't have. They have promised too much to too many and don't have the money to pay up. Until they are all bailed out, and the only way to do that is stop spending, there can't be a recovery.
Compared to Europe, our spending isn't nearly as bad as theirs. Youre right, spending not kept in check can undermine the value of any currency because to pay the debt, the currency has to be inflated thus creating a weak currency and sapping the buying power of the average consumer.
Our economy is to complex to blame any one thing. Housing is the biggest reason why jobs haven't returned. But as far as our weak currency you can ultimately blame two unfunded wars and the bush tax cuts as well as monetary policy.
If you can look at this with unbiased eyes like I try to do, (because you can't see the truth with ideological blinders on) What we have here is two decades of bad policy coming home to roost. It began during the Clinton years pushing sub-prime mortgages, then after 9-11 the fed cut rates to zero. During the Bush years there was Lax regulation in the housing market. As well as cutting taxes at the same time going to war with two countries. ( never heard of by the way). Then we had t.a.r.p, cash for clunkers, extended unemployment etc...thats driven the short-term deficits up.
SO...heres what happend. All the white folks had a party, and we did what we always do, Hired the black guy to clean it up!.....and now we're all pissed because he hasn't cleaned it up as fast as we had hoped.
Bush wasn't the idiot everyone thought he was, and Obama isn't the socialists conservatives try to say he is.
I just wish everyone would come off it....See shit for what it is.
|
12/10/2011 6:59:20 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Not true. Our spending is worse, especially in terms of wealth and total money. Beginning with the worst, Greece, we are number 5. The worst over-spenders in terms of debt to GDP ratio are:
Japan
Greece
Portugal
Italy
United States
China
France
Germany
The top 4 have goverment spending that is more than 100 percent of GDP. We are almost there.
|
12/10/2011 10:57:29 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
drew_5050
Middletown, OH
34, joined Oct. 2011
|
I'm glad you mentioned Germany. The more I look at Germany and how they do stuff over there the more impressed I am.
|
1/22/2012 8:47:38 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
According to CNN to be counted among the world's richest 1% an individual only need make $34,000 a year while the true middle class measured worldwide live on $1,225 a year. What's that say about our 99%?
|
1/31/2012 3:16:04 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
betterwithme
Severy, KS
62, joined Dec. 2009
|
I see their up and acting stupid again. I bet the americanwoman99 is right there "behind" them all.
|
2/1/2012 12:38:59 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
I read recently that with Obama's new demand to borrow another trillion plus the nations debt will exceed 100% of GDP in 2012. Not 2020 as predicted, already in 2012. Not good folks.
|
2/1/2012 12:42:54 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
betterwithme
Severy, KS
62, joined Dec. 2009
|
I read recently that with Obama's new demand to borrow another trillion plus the nations debt will exceed 100% of GDP in 2012. Not 2020 as predicted, already in 2012. Not good folks.
Do you think anyone under the age of 25 understands the outcome of this?
|
2/1/2012 5:39:31 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Obama will run his campaign on an OWS mantra pitting rich against the poor. He will demand bigger government and more handouts and demand that the "rich" pay for it. Why? With the most expensive and ineffective response to any recession in history behind him he surely can't run on his record. The follwoing OpEd from the Wall Street Journal exemplifies it quite well:
Obama's Enemies List
David and Charles Koch have been the targets of a campaign of vituperation and assault, choreographed from the very top
By THEODORE B. OLSON
How would you feel if aides to the president of the United States singled you out by name for attack, and if you were featured prominently in the president's re-election campaign as an enemy of the people?
What would you do if the White House engaged in derogatory speculative innuendo about the integrity of your tax returns? Suppose also that the president's surrogates and allies in the media regularly attacked you, sullied your reputation and questioned your integrity. On top of all of that, what if a leading member of the president's party in Congress demanded your appearance before a congressional committee this week so that you could be interrogated about the Keystone XL oil pipeline project in which you have repeatedly-and accurately-stated that you have no involvement?
Consider that all this is happening because you have been selected as an attractive political punching bag by the president's re-election team. This is precisely what has happened to Charles and David Koch, even though they are private citizens, and neither is a candidate for the president's or anyone else's office.
What Messrs. Koch do, in fact, is manage businesses that provide employment to more than 50,000 people in North America in legitimate, productive industries. They also give millions of dollars to medical researchers, hospitals and cultural institutions. Their biggest offense, apparently, is that they also contribute generously to nonprofit organizations that promote personal liberty and free enterprise, and some of those organizations oppose policies advocated by the president.
Richard Nixon maintained an "enemies list" that singled out private citizens for investigation and abuse by agencies of government, including the Internal Revenue Service. When that was revealed, the press and public were outraged. That conduct will forever remain one of the indelible stains on Nixon's presidency and legacy.
When Joseph McCarthy engaged in comparable bullying, oppression and slander from his powerful position in the Senate, he was censured by his colleagues and died in disgrace. "McCarthyism," defined by Webster's as the "use of unfair investigative and accusatory methods to suppress opposition," will forever be synonymous with un-Americanism. Army counsel Joseph Welch's "Have you no sense of decency?" are words that evoke the McCarthy era and diminish the reputations of his colleagues who did nothing to stand up to him.
In this country, we regard the use of official power to oppress or intimidate private citizens as a despicable abuse of authority and entirely alien to our system of a government of laws. The architects of our Constitution meticulously erected a system of separated powers, and checks and balances, precisely in order to inhibit the exercise of tyrannical power by governmental officials.
Our Constitution even explicitly prohibits bills of attainder so that Congress may not single out individual citizens or groups for disfavored treatment or unequal application of the force of government. Prosecutorial power is rigidly constrained and judicially supervised so that government may not accuse private citizens of crimes or investigate them without good cause.
Whoever may be the victim of such abuse of governmental authority, the press and public almost invariably unify with indignation against it. If a journalist, labor-union leader or community organizer on the left can be targeted today, an academic or business person on the right can be the target tomorrow. If we fail to stand up against oppression from one direction, we abdicate the moral authority to challenge it when it comes from another.
This is why it is exceedingly important for all Americans to respond with outrage to what the president and his allies are doing to demonize and stigmatize David and Charles Koch. They have been the targets of the multiyear, carefully orchestrated campaign of vituperation and assault described above-and much more. It has been choreographed from the very top. When the president personally takes leadership, his political surrogates and army of allies in the press and Congress quickly and surely follow the direction and tone he sets.
The misuse of government power to damage or demean one's political enemies is abhorrent and the very antithesis of a free society and a government of laws, not men. It is time for the public to ask those engaged in these practices, "Have you no sense of decency?"
Mr. Olson, a lawyer in Washington, D.C., and a former solicitor general of the United States, represents Koch Industries.
|
2/12/2012 3:40:17 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Well, my secretary just got her taxes back. She paid in less than $800 and got a bit over $8500 back. She's gonna get the mirror fixed on her car and buy her son some shoes. Then she is gonna do all the other things she couldn't afford on her $16.50 an hour salary. She is so bullby happy! But, how in the hell is it possible she got so much more than she paid in? The government took your money away and gave it to her and then borrowed some to make up the difference. It is simply sick.
This video link must be TMI for the forum. Government has no business doing anything they are not asked or empowered to do by the Constitution. Today they control every aspect of our lives and impact in in some way at every turn. There is a rule or regulation about anything you can think of. They (the government) hasn't missed a thing. Not one single little tiny thing. They are up your a** on everything you do from putting little tags on your mattress to telling you how, when, and how often to have sex, eat, sleep, even dream. They protect your little fat kids from you and tell McDonalds what they can serve. They are all about making you better. Like it or not.
The point of it all is that they are supposed to serve us, not subjugate us to their utopian ideas about who and what America should be. Time to take it back and send this government packing. Why in the hell are we paying them to tell us what to do when the original purpose was for us to tell them? How weak have we beomce? Why? Put on your britches and stand up. Put the servants in their place! After all, constitutionally they are the sevants, not the masters.
But they have become the masters and we have become the subjects of their benevolence. I say screw them. Cast them out and take our lives back. If you are dependent on them you become a common enemy with them. Liars and thieves, that's all they are. If you are with them you are also. Eat their lies and and align with them and you become an enemy of freedom. Stand up and put your big boy and girl pants on. It is time to make America great again and get the damned government out of our lives.
This is some sick shit folks.
|
2/26/2012 1:57:46 AM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
wasaqueen
Seymour, IN
72, joined Feb. 2012
|
In IN our republican state official was just arrested for living with his girlfriend in a new house and using his wife's address to collect funds he was not supposed to have and voter fraud. So how about some of the cheaters that are stealing taxpayer funds being looked at while they are attacking unions, womens bodies, and the poor and illigals for causing all the trouble? Attack all those who have no power that is the republican way. As bad a the dems are at least theirs is sex mostly.
|
2/26/2012 3:54:21 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Nothing wrong with sex, lots wrong with Dems!
|
2/28/2012 7:32:51 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jokethem
Kansas City, KS
63, joined Feb. 2012
|
True sir, but what happens when dems have sex?
|
2/29/2012 8:37:39 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
wasaqueen
Seymour, IN
72, joined Feb. 2012
|
Why don't you tell me since you are in their beds all the time? There have been just as many cheating republican presidents how about Nixen? He was forced to resign.
|
2/29/2012 8:39:49 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Why don't you tell me since you are in their beds all the time? There have been just as many cheating republican presidents how about Nixen? He was forced to resign.
As a democrat.
|
2/29/2012 8:44:40 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
wasaqueen
Seymour, IN
72, joined Feb. 2012
|
Nixon was a republican.
|
2/29/2012 9:06:05 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
Nixon was a republican.
Occupy wall street are communists fools of the Obama machine.
|
3/2/2012 4:39:21 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
wasaqueen
Seymour, IN
72, joined Feb. 2012
|
You have no idea who or what they are. Too busy with your brown nose up the rich republicans butts.
|
3/2/2012 8:09:53 PM |
Occupy Wallstreet |
|
jbck
Springdale, AR
62, joined Aug. 2007
|
I know exactly who and what the OWS crowd is. They are Queenie! God help them. If only there was hope for such poor, silly, uniformed, entitled, spoiled children. Too bad there just isn't any. Times are tough enough. Who has time to worry about a bunch of whiners that don't have the intestinal fortitude to do for themselves?
|
|
|