| 7/3/2014 2:51:59 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
cowboyshoots77
Abilene, TX
40, joined May. 2013
|
F**king punk
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
| 7/3/2014 3:45:01 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Ok back on topic ....
|
| 7/3/2014 3:45:28 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Judging by her wrinkles my neighbor I am sure was the first critter to walk the earht. 
|
| 7/3/2014 4:37:38 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Judging by her wrinkles my neighbor I am sure was the first critter to walk the earht.
Am sure you have some knowledge on this topics. ..
|
| 7/3/2014 6:02:11 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
cowboyshoots77
Abilene, TX
40, joined May. 2013
|
Go read some history because you do not know nothing
|
| 7/3/2014 6:31:21 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
You wish I didn't know anything 
|
| 7/3/2014 7:06:56 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
vivalamigra
Chicago, IL
51, joined Apr. 2013
|
Adam and Eve.
Then Cain and Abel.
After that I think Cain and Abel adopted?
|
| 7/3/2014 7:12:10 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
cupocheer
Assumption, IL
68, joined May. 2010
|
Cain & Able married women from the land of Nod.
Adam & Steve adopted. .... yee haw -- ride 'em cowboy
|
| 7/3/2014 8:20:58 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
|
| 7/3/2014 9:48:45 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
cupocheer
Assumption, IL
68, joined May. 2010
|
Wha'chu talkin' 'bout, aborigine?
|
| 7/3/2014 10:19:05 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
No, wTf are you talking about....
|
| 7/3/2014 10:23:24 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
61falcon
New Hope, PA
76, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
According to the Bible Adam and Eve had 3 sons Cain,Abel and Seth.Cain slew Abel.No mention is ever made of ANY DAUGHTERS.How did the Earth get populated,were Cain and Seth mother-----ERs????
|
| 7/3/2014 10:27:36 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
markjetson
Albuquerque, NM
61, joined Jan. 2013
|
Go read some history because you do not know nothing
and you don't know phonics
|
| 7/3/2014 11:11:55 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
cupocheer
Assumption, IL
68, joined May. 2010
|
According to the Bible Adam and Eve had 3 sons Cain,Abel and Seth.Cain slew Abel.No mention is ever made of ANY DAUGHTERS.How did the Earth get populated,were Cain and Seth mother-----ERs????
I already told you ~~
Adam & Eve's sons married women from the land of Nod. DUH!
|
| 7/3/2014 11:12:42 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
cupocheer
Assumption, IL
68, joined May. 2010
|
No, wTf are you talking about....
Your heritage, sweety.
|
| 7/3/2014 11:19:20 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
from 61falcon:
According to the Bible Adam and Eve had 3 sons Cain,Abel and Seth.Cain slew Abel.No mention is ever made of ANY DAUGHTERS.How did the Earth get populated,were Cain and Seth mother-----ERs????
Exactly my point.
|
| 7/4/2014 3:28:36 AM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
dreamweaver58
Olympia, WA
65, joined May. 2010
|
Here is a little something to chew on when asking how many sons and daughters Adam and Eve had. Apparently they had many children!
Genesis 5:3-4King James Version (KJV)
3 And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, and after his image; and called his name Seth:
4 And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:
...............................
http://www.creationmoments.com/content/how-many-children-did-adam-and-eve-have
Living over 900 years means living ten times longer than we do today. Proportionately, the female period of fecundity – today 30 to 35 years – would then be about 350 years. At a rate of only one child every seven years, this would result in 50 children for Adam's immediate family. Interestingly, two ancient books written about the time of Christ but not having the authority of inspired Scripture confirm these figures. The Book of Jubilees, whose author is unknown, was written in the second century B.C. and states that Adam and Eve were in the Garden of Paradise seven years [p.49]. Then Eve gave birth to her first child, Cain, between the ages of 64-70, or the same numbers as the age of the Earth, anno mundi. Eve's second child, Abel, was born seven years later – between the years 71-77 anno mundi [p.51]. The total number of Adam's children is not given in this work; however, it is found as a footnote in The Works of Josephus where it states: "The number of Adam's children, as says the old tradition, was 33 sons and 23 daughters." In view of their longevity, these appear to be reasonable figures while it would have to be said that, sinners though they were, Adam and Eve had faithfully obeyed God's first commission to: "be fruitful and multiply …" [Genesis 1:28].
|
| 7/4/2014 5:51:57 AM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
jerryxy
Chesterfield, MO
28, joined Sep. 2013
|
black africans
|
| 7/4/2014 7:03:52 AM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Am sure you have some knowledge on this topics. ..
No a direct knowledge...trust me. Sorry to disappoint you.
[Edited 7/4/2014 7:05:29 AM ]
|
| 7/4/2014 7:40:52 AM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
anstarr777
Reading, PA
56, joined Mar. 2013
|
I don't know what kibbles nor bits has to do with it...
Nor does this topic belong on current events!!!
White people came first. Get over it...
impossible, the recessive couldn't have come first.
Genetically impossible.
A bag of rocks are smarter than you.
|
| 7/4/2014 3:17:02 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
black africans
Can africans be whites too?
|
| 7/4/2014 3:21:42 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
anstarr777
Reading, PA
56, joined Mar. 2013
|
Can africans be whites too?
yes, they are albinos.
|
| 7/4/2014 3:23:40 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
yes, they are albinos.
True, so whites are albinos ?
|
| 7/4/2014 3:25:20 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
cupocheer
Assumption, IL
68, joined May. 2010
|
yes, they are albinos.
What a dumb arsed comment from a supposedly grown man.
You b 1 crzeee nigga dudeo.
|
| 7/4/2014 3:25:39 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Africans Most Genetically Varied People on Earth
Published May 01, 2009
Associated Press
Not exactly on topic...but quite interesting...
Africans have more genetic variation than anyone else on Earth, according to a new study that helps narrow the location where humans first evolved, probably near the South Africa-Namibia border.
The largest study of African genetics ever undertaken also found that nearly three-fourths of African-Americans can trace their ancestry to West Africa.
The new analysis published Thursday in the online edition of the journal Science.
"Given the fact that modern humans arose in Africa, they have had time to accumulate dramatic changes" in their genes, explained lead researcher Sarah Tishkoff, a geneticist at the University of Pennsylvania.
People have been adapting to very diverse environmental niches in Africa, she explained in a briefing.
• Click here to visit FOXNews.com's Natural Science Center.
Over 10 years, Tishkoff and an international team of researchers trekked across Africa collecting samples to compare the genes of various peoples.
Often working in primitive conditions, the researchers sometimes had to resort to using a car battery to power their equipment, Tishkoff explained.
The reason for their work? Very little was known about the genetic variation in Africans, knowledge that is vital to understanding why diseases have a greater impact in some groups than others and in designing ways to counter those illnesses.
Scott M. Williams of Vanderbilt University noted that constructing patterns of disease variations can help determine which genes predispose a group to a particular illness.
This study "provides a critical piece in the puzzle," he said.
For example, there are clear differences in prevalence of diseases such as hypertension and prostate cancer across populations, Williams said.
"The human genome describes the complexity of our species," added Muntaser Ibrahim of the department of molecular biology at the University of Khartoum, Sudan. "Now we have spectacular insight into the history of the African population ... the oldest history of mankind.
"Everybody's history is part of African history because everybody came out of Africa," Ibrahim said.
Christopher Ehret of the department of history at the University of California, Los Angeles, compared genetic variation among people to variations in language.
There are an estimated 2,000 distinct language groups in Africa broken into a few broad categories, often but not always following gene flow.
Movement of a language usually involves arrival of new people, Ehret noted, bringing along their genes.
But sometimes language is brought by a small "but advantaged" group which can impose their language without significant gene flow.
Overall, the researchers were able to study and compare the genetics of 121 African groups, 60 non-African populations and four African-American groups.
The so-called "Cape colored" population of South Africa has the highest levels of mixed ancestry on the globe, a blend of African, European, East Asian and South Asian, Tishkoff said.
"This will be a great population for study of diseases" that are more common in one group than another, she said.
The study also found that about 71 percent of African-Americans can trace their ancestry to western African origins.
They also have between 13 percent and 15 percent European ancestry and a smaller amount of other African origins.
There was "very little" evidence for American Indian genes among African-Americans, Tishkoff said.
Ehret added that only about 20 percent of the Africans brought to North America made the trip directly, while most of the rest went first to the West Indies.
And, he added, some local African-American populations, such as the residents of the sea islands off Georgia and South Carolina, can trace their origins to specific regions such as Sierra Leone and Guinea.
The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute, the National Institutes of Health, the Advanced Computing Center for Research and Education at Vanderbilt University, the L.S.B. Leakey and Wenner Gren Foundation, the National Science Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard and Burroughs Wellcome foundations.
[Edited 7/4/2014 3:26:20 PM ]
|
| 7/4/2014 3:37:36 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
bluecougareyes
Chelan, WA
73, joined Nov. 2008
|
Africans Most Genetically Varied People on Earth
Published May 01, 2009
Associated Press
Not exactly on topic...but quite interesting...
Thanks...  ... Good Read !
|
| 7/4/2014 4:03:09 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
anstarr777
Reading, PA
56, joined Mar. 2013
|
True, so whites are albinos ?
modern variation.
|
| 7/4/2014 4:05:12 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Copy
|
| 7/4/2014 4:16:45 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
anstarr777
Reading, PA
56, joined Mar. 2013
|
What a dumb arsed comment from a supposedly grown man.
You b 1 crzeee nigga dudeo.
His team found a specific gene, known as the OCA2 gene, which if altered would result in human beings without melanin in their hair, eyes, or skin color--a condition known as ALBINISM.
Thus, this OCA2 gene seems to have been targeted and manipulated by some force or event around 6000+years ago.
Seems to me your the dumb ass. CUPOFSHIT.
|
| 7/4/2014 4:20:17 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Not according to Dr. Hans Eiberg of the University of Copenhagen, who confirmed that all blue-eyed humans have a "genetic mutation " that he says occurred 6000 years ago.
I guess I am an Albino
|
| 7/4/2014 4:21:38 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
I guess I am an Albino
Well a sexxy one for that matter lol
|
| 7/4/2014 4:47:04 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Well a sexxy one for that matter lol
Was it a typo or you are giving me an extra chromosome? LOL
|
| 7/4/2014 4:48:27 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
1truuprince
Today I was in "Da Bronx" and I saw you... LOL
|
| 7/4/2014 4:49:55 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
anstarr777
Reading, PA
56, joined Mar. 2013
|
I guess I am an Albino
That's not a bad thing, however, modern people of European decent are not albinos, they are descendants of the genetic code of OCA2 gene. This gene was important in that it contributed to surviving the brutal various ice ages in central and northern Europe thousands of years ago.
|
| 7/4/2014 5:17:52 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
1truuprince
Today I was in "Da Bronx" and I saw you... LOL
Really. .. am in New Jersey tho
|
| 7/4/2014 6:38:08 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Really. .. am in New Jersey tho
well, then, was a look alike...LOL
|
| 7/4/2014 6:43:02 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
well, then, was a look alike...LOL
Lol
But am one of a kind lol
|
| 7/4/2014 7:04:10 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Lol
But am one of a kind lol
|
| 7/4/2014 7:45:16 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
bluecougareyes
Chelan, WA
73, joined Nov. 2008
|
Lol
But am one of a kind lol
YEAH.. one of a kind...
One of a Kind of group like these guys
,
|
| 7/4/2014 7:50:25 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
YEAH.. one of a kind...
One of a Kind of group like these guys
,
Nope
Can't be so, I see you in there lol
|
| 7/4/2014 8:24:09 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Both of you, guys....behave...is the Nation's birthday...
|
| 7/4/2014 8:27:32 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
frankyj51
Staffordsville, KY
32, joined Mar. 2013
|
 if you ain't white you ain't right
|
| 7/4/2014 10:04:05 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Seem like everyone drinking tonight lol.
|
| 7/5/2014 6:32:44 AM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Seem like everyone drinking tonight lol.
Not me...I never do.
|
| 7/5/2014 9:26:34 AM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
deepchocolate31
Detroit, MI
46, joined May. 2012
|
What does this have to do with current events and politics? Oh shit I'm in the wrong area not you OP.. Oh well let me leave and click current events and politics...
what does this have to do with current events and politics? Oh shit I'm in the wrong area not you OP.. Oh well let me leave and click current events and politics...
What does this have to do with.... Wait a minute... ??? I think the link is broken here let me try again...
?!?
|
| 7/5/2014 2:44:11 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Not me...I never do.
Really. .. That's interesting
Hope you enjoying your 4th july.
|
| 7/5/2014 5:59:35 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Really. .. That's interesting
Hope you enjoying your 4th july.
A you know, Arthur messed up everything.
|
| 7/5/2014 6:00:36 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Really. .. That's interesting
Why?
|
| 7/5/2014 6:01:10 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
A you know, Arthur messed up everything.
Am heading to new york for a bbq, so far is nice out.... come out where ever you are.
|
| 7/5/2014 6:02:43 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
beanhammer
Denton, TX
52, joined Jun. 2014
|
Just a guess but even whites get darker with sun an age as do all other races. Whites seem more natural to have came
first.
|
| 7/5/2014 6:04:07 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Why?
There always a time of celebration in new york city.... a cheer of drink always presenting and taking place with mostly everyone here.
|
| 7/5/2014 6:07:05 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Just a guess but even whites get darker with sun an age as do all other races. Whites seem more natural to have came
first.
Due to science, whites get burn in the sun or produce skin cancer if in the sun too long but people with melanin get darker.
|
| 7/5/2014 7:09:43 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Am heading to new york for a bbq, so far is nice out.... come out where ever you are.
Enjoy; i am having diner at home.
|
| 7/5/2014 7:11:08 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
There always a time of celebration in new york city.... a cheer of drink always presenting and taking place with mostly everyone here.
I don't see things as you do...and public events are not my cup of tea.
|
| 7/5/2014 7:14:24 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Due to science, whites get burn in the sun or produce skin cancer if in the sun too long but people with melanin get darker.
I don't go even near the sun...and I use a lot of sunscreen....
Now, my mother was whiter than milk but she could go under the sun and would never burn...in fact, she used to get a lovely suntan in a matter of hours.
|
| 7/5/2014 7:19:15 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
I don't go even near the sun...and I use a lot of sunscreen....
Now, my mother was whiter than milk but she could go under the sun and would never burn...in fact, she used to get a lovely suntan in a matter of hours.
Its due to her melanin skin which 92%(not actual percentage)are likely to get burn by the sun light well people with some darker or stronger melanin never get burn at all because the sun seem to have a combination with dark colors, that why they say don't wear black out in the sun because you will burn.
|
| 7/5/2014 7:48:22 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
Its due to her melanin skin which 92%(not actual percentage)are likely to get burn by the sun light well people with some darker or stronger melanin never get burn at all because the sun seem to have a combination with dark colors, that why they say don't wear black out in the sun because you will burn.
I know is the melanin
|
| 7/5/2014 8:10:04 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
I know is the melanin
I believe any body can have strong melanin or produce a good skin tone naturally by eating right, outside activities while the sun hitting.
|
| 7/5/2014 8:16:11 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
duchessa
Yonkers, NY
63, joined Aug. 2008
|
I believe any body can have strong melanin or produce a good skin tone naturally by eating right, outside activities while the sun hitting.
Eating ight has its value...besides melanin...
I am tiredddddddddddd
|
| 7/5/2014 8:21:38 PM |
Who were the first? | Page 2 |
|
1truuprince
Franklinville, NJ
35, joined Apr. 2012
|
Eating ight has its value...besides melanin...
I am tiredddddddddddd
Eatting is the biggest value for the body , melanin is good because it adore sunlight which produces Vitamin C if am not mistaken.
By the way you should rest .
[Edited 7/5/2014 8:22:19 PM ]
|