mischiefmanaged
Bellevue, WA
47, joined Jul. 2010
|
Guardian UK's front page: "Defector admits to WMD lies that triggered Iraq war"
link- http://gu.com/p/2n5ky
Title pretty much says it all. How do you feel about this? which do you prefer:
* justifying why it happened
* mad that it's based on lies, fabrication, exaggerations etc.
I think people are afraid of looking bad/wrong. But if we were wrong, being stubborn in the face of evidence doesn't change the fact that we were wrong. Worse yet it leaves us open for making more mistakes in the future. I really think we shouldn't gloss over this.
so what's your stance?
the end justifies the means?
or we should never have gone there?
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|