Select your best hookup:
Local
Gay
Asian
Latin
East Europe

how to post on mega personal

My family members has no other signifies of financial assistance, and I am now paying complete tuition for all of my younger siblings with relative ease. dating in medicine hat alberta The Church refers to these kinds of marriages as mixed marriages. Patient does not give health related assistance, diagnosis or remedy. how to get rendevu app A much better group of people also, he mentioned.

download hookup dating app

We attain out to all youth in an try to enable them keep away from this tragedy. get laid in birmingham al He would describe an event and mention a individual, and I would chime in that I knew that exact same individual. You could possibly love it as well and have now found typical ground. dating site called meet me Strictly Necessary Cookie really should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

Home  Sign In  Search  Date Ideas  Join  Forums  Singles Groups  - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!


12/22/2014 2:11:33 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


I've got these rubber sandals I wear in warm weather when I don't feel like wearing shoes. Peole call them flip flops because when I walk in them they go flip-flop-flip-flop. They remind me of Protestantism.




Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!

DateHookup.dating - 100% Free Personals


12/22/2014 5:49:12 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

isna_la_wica
Over 7,500 Posts!! (7,776)
Brantford, ON
63, joined Mar. 2012


Quote from ludlowlowell:
I've got these rubber sandals I wear in warm weather when I don't feel like wearing shoes. Peole call them flip flops because when I walk in them they go flip-flop-flip-flop. They remind me of Protestantism.


Once again, lud is rejecting his own Church .

MOBILE, Alabama - First, the pope does not want his ring kissed. And he prefers to be called Father Francis rather than Your Holiness.

Those were some of the marching orders given to Rev. Henry W. Roberts II of Mobile and other bishops with the Communion of Evangelical Episcopal Churches, who met with Pope Francis at the Vatican Oct. 10. The CEEC is an international ecumenical network that strives for unity among all Christians.

Roberts and Pope at lunch.jpg
Pope Francis dines with 12 bishops of various Protestant denominations from the Communion of Evangelical Episcopal Churches on Oct. 10, 2014, at the Vatican. Third from Pope Francis' right is Rev. Henry Roberts II, pastor of Word of Life Community Church in Mobile. (Courtesy Word of Life Church)

"He looks like one of the fellas. He's so down to earth," said Roberts, describing a photo he took with the pope during the visit. Roberts is founding pastor of Word of Life Community Church, an interdenominational congregation of 1,500 with locations in Chickasaw and Whistler. A graduate of McGill-Toolen Catholic School, he has been a bishop with the CEEC network since 2007.

Roberts said one of the bishops asked the pontiff if he would bless them to go and proclaim the miracle of unity. "He said, 'I can't really bless you, because we're brother bishops.' He actually called us his brother bishops," he said.

Roberts said the group met with Pope Francis for more than an hour and shared lunch in his private dining room at Casa Santa Marta, his Vatican residence. The main topics at the meeting, which occurred during the recent Synod, were family and Christian unity.

"He said, No. 1, that we as believers, as Christians, have to stop talking bad about each other and being condescending," Roberts recalled. "No. 2, we need to find a good Catholic that we can just fellowship with and develop a relationship with."
purchased the white hat made especially for Francis in Rome to make the swap. "I loved his personality, and I could feel his heart and compassion for people and h
Roberts also exchanged a skull cap called a zucchetto with the pontiff. He had is love for people," he said. "I know he's sincere about seeing people come together."
Pope Francis 'called us his brother bishops,' says Protestant ...
www.al.com/living/index.ssf/.../pope_francis_is_like_one_of_th.html


Pope Francis and the church is right, lud is wrong once again.

You need to do something about that hate lud. Its really getting to you. I suggest you follow what Francis said.:

"He said, No. 1, that we as believers, as Christians, have to stop talking bad about each other and being condescending," Roberts recalled. "No. 2, we need to find a good Catholic that we can just fellowship with and develop a relationship with."

12/22/2014 10:49:09 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


With all the changes I have seen in the Catholic church over the years I have to say it is your Apostate church that likes to flip-flop.

And more changes on the way.

12/22/2014 11:07:20 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
mindya
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (23,667)
Vancouver, BC
64, joined Jan. 2009


Quote from ludlowlowell:
I've got these rubber sandals I wear in warm weather when I don't feel like wearing shoes.


They are perfect for yer feet of clay.

12/22/2014 1:30:43 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Pope Francis may have said those things, but Pope Pius X called Protestant ministers "enemies of the cross of Jesus Christ". Pope Pius IX said that not much hope should be given to those who die without converting. Pope Eugene IV said that neither hereics nor schismatics nor Jews will enter Heaven unless they convert. St. Ireaneus, I think it was, said that he who does not have the Church for a mother cannot claim to have God as a Father. St. Robert Bellarmine said heretics will not enter Heaven because their faith is false. St. Teresa of Avila had a vision wherein God showed her Lutherans going to Hell in large numbers. See also Pope Pius XI's encyclical Mortalium Animos.

12/22/2014 1:59:11 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


That is all a bunch of BS.

I have seen many changes in the Catholic church. It does plenty of flip-flopping.

Remember when the masses were in Latin?

And I have seen you and louie disagree on some things. Sects within sects.

Lies. Lies. Lies.

12/22/2014 2:34:56 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Ceremonies in the Church change. Disciplinary rules, such as not eating meat on Fridays, change. Doctrines never change. It is a doctrine of the Church that outside the Church there is no salvation. There are exceptions to this, but only in the most extraordinary of circumstances.

Protestantism flip flops. When slavery was popular, Protestantism supported slavery, When it became unpopular, Protestantism was against it, all the while telling people that morality wasn't important, all you needed was faith in Jesus, and even the worst slave traders could still go to Heaven if they believed in Jesus. Catholicism has always been against slavery. Pope after pope after pope condemned it.

When racism was popular, Protestantism embraced racism. You should have seen the racists at my old Methodist church back in Alabama during the 1960s! When racism became unpopular, Protestantism went against Protestantism. The Catholic Church has always been against racism.

When contraception was unpopular, Protestantism was against contraception. When contraception became popular, Protestatntism was pro-contraception. The Catholic Church has always been against contraception.

As homosexual sex becomes more and more popular, you will see Protestant churches all of a sudden deciding that the "spirit" now says homosexual sex is now okay (it's already begun to happen). The Catholic Church has always stood against this perversion, even if the present weak pope almost decided to approve of it. The Holy Spirit will not allow the Church to teach error.

When divorce and remarriage was unpopular, Protestantism was against divorce and remarriage. When it became popular, Protestantism flip flopped. Catholicism has always been against divorce and remarriage, and always will be, even if once and awhile we get a weak pope who tries to change the doctrine. Notice Pope Francis didn't have the guts to change the doctrine, after the synod he called firmly re-iterated Christ's teaching on the matter. The Holy Spirit will not allow the Church to teach error.

Protestantism, the shifting sands. Catholicism, the solid rock.

12/22/2014 6:22:14 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

elfiegirl
Over 4,000 Posts! (5,513)
Deland, FL
63, joined Nov. 2007


Christ taught

"Love your neighbors as you
love yourselves."

Who is your "neighbor"???

EVERYONE

He also taught us to
love our enemies as well.

Tsk, tsk, tsk.

Shame on anyone who forgets
the 2nd greatest commandment
CHRIST gave us.

If you aren't loving your neighbors as you love yourself, then you ARE breaking HIS commandment!!!

Be careful. God KNOWS
your heart!



[Edited 12/22/2014 6:22:46 PM ]

12/22/2014 6:44:53 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
joyusall2
Over 2,000 Posts (3,574)
Queensland
Australia
71, joined Oct. 2011


Quote from ludlowlowell:
I've got these rubber sandals I wear in warm weather when I don't feel like wearing shoes. Peole call them flip flops because when I walk in them they go flip-flop-flip-flop. They remind me of Protestantism.


I heard of luds flip flops
here we call them throngs
I suppose they are flip flops
cuz lud
is never wrong (hope u at least smiled)

12/22/2014 9:57:24 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
mindya
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (23,667)
Vancouver, BC
64, joined Jan. 2009


Quote from ludlowlowell:
I've got Roman Catholic stamped on the soles of me feet




12/22/2014 10:44:59 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


Quote from ludlowlowell:
Ceremonies in the Church change. Disciplinary rules, such as not eating meat on Fridays, change. Doctrines never change. It is a doctrine of the Church that outside the Church there is no salvation. There are exceptions to this, but only in the most extraordinary of circumstances.


So if something in the church changes you just don't call it doctrine.

Quote from ludlowlowell:
When racism was popular, Protestantism embraced racism. You should have seen the racists at my old Methodist church back in Alabama during the 1960s! When racism became unpopular, Protestantism went against Protestantism. The Catholic Church has always been against racism.


Yet you call non-Catholic "heretics," which is very similar to racism.

Quote from ludlowlowell:
As homosexual sex becomes more and more popular, you will see Protestant churches all of a sudden deciding that the "spirit" now says homosexual sex is now okay (it's already begun to happen). The Catholic Church has always stood against this perversion, even if the present weak pope almost decided to approve of it. The Holy Spirit will not allow the Church to teach error.


You mis-represent Protestantism by making up lies about them and then criticizing them for the lies you make up.

All the mainstream Churches are against homosexuality. We are taught to not hate the person but the sin. Perhaps you are confused by that. You are taught to hate homosexuals?

12/23/2014 4:11:18 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
joyusall2
Over 2,000 Posts (3,574)
Queensland
Australia
71, joined Oct. 2011


Quote from mindya:



iS THAT LIKE THE SONG
dIAMONDS ON THE SOLES OF HER SHOES

12/23/2014 1:58:26 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Bigd, we are taught in the Catholic Church to hate the sin but love the sinner, to hate the heresy but love the heretic.

12/23/2014 2:23:45 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

isna_la_wica
Over 7,500 Posts!! (7,776)
Brantford, ON
63, joined Mar. 2012


Many times, it has been pointed out to lud, that he is in disagreement with his own church.

For years now, he has been saying, that the Pope is infallable, and the Church is the only authority on matters of Christ and the Scriptures.

Yet, now, he claims that Pope Francis is weak, and the Church is wrong?

You are flip flopping all over the place lud.

Your like a right foot, complaining about the sound the left foot is making with the flip flops, and its really echoes from your own flip flopping.

Most here, disagree with others. But, can still call them "Brothers and Sisters". Your Pope has done it, your Church has done it, but you are trying to move back wards , flip flopping away.

Reminds me of this Stephen King quote:

“Flip-flop, hippety-hop, offa your rocker and over the top, life's a fiction and the world's a lie, so put on some Creedence and let's get high.”



? Stephen King, The Drawing of the Three

12/23/2014 3:41:33 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


I may flip flop, but the Catholic Church never does.

Isna, I'm glad you are taking the time to study Catholic documents to see what they say. I hope you will continue. As you get deeper into it you will learn to distinguish between the Church's infallible teachings, which are handed down from the apostles, and which never change, although from time to time a pope or council will issue an infallible statement to clarify (what you rightly quoted Cardinal Newman about), and things said by priests, catechisms, and even saints and popes, that are merely the writer's personal opinions.

Let's take the issue of salvation outside the Church. Jesus Himself said that if one rejects the pope one rejects God (Luke 10:16). Almost every one of the Church Fathers taught that outside the Church there is no salvation. But they also taught that baptism of blood (a martyr who dies before being sacramentally baptized), or baptism of desire (a person who was being instructed in the faith but who wanted to be baptized but who died before being baptized) can substitute for sacramental Baptism. But what of virtuous pagans who died without ever hearing the gospel? some began to ask. The doctrine developed that they might have implicit baptism of desire.

Now you can find Catholic catechisms that say any and all go to Heaven, Communion is merely symbolic, sex outside of marriage is okay, even homosexual sex, Jesus didn't really do any miracles, Jesus didn't know Who He was, Jesus didn't know He was God, birt control is okay, divorce and remarriage are okay, etc. You can even find this stuff being said by cardinals and popes in their private remarks ,(the pope is not infallible unless he is speaking publicly). But unless something is part of the long standing ongoing teaching of the Church, it is not infallible and might even be, and someties is, heretical.

If you really want to know what the Catholic Church teaches, stick to the infallible statements of popes, councils, and Church Fathers, not stuff put out by Vatican II, a non-infallible council, says, or what some random catechism book says.

12/23/2014 4:03:14 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

isna_la_wica
Over 7,500 Posts!! (7,776)
Brantford, ON
63, joined Mar. 2012


Quote from ludlowlowell:
I may flip flop, but the Catholic Church never does.

Isna, I'm glad you are taking the time to study Catholic documents to see what they say. I hope you will continue. As you get deeper into it you will learn to distinguish between the Church's infallible teachings, which are handed down from the apostles, and which never change, although from time to time a pope or council will issue an infallible statement to clarify (what you rightly quoted Cardinal Newman about), and things said by priests, catechisms, and even saints and popes, that are merely the writer's personal opinions.

Let's take the issue of salvation outside the Church. Jesus Himself said that if one rejects the pope one rejects God (Luke 10:16). Almost every one of the Church Fathers taught that outside the Church there is no salvation. But they also taught that baptism of blood (a martyr who dies before being sacramentally baptized), or baptism of desire (a person who was being instructed in the faith but who wanted to be baptized but who died before being baptized) can substitute for sacramental Baptism. But what of virtuous pagans who died without ever hearing the gospel? some began to ask. The doctrine developed that they might have implicit baptism of desire.

Now you can find Catholic catechisms that say any and all go to Heaven, Communion is merely symbolic, sex outside of marriage is okay, even homosexual sex, Jesus didn't really do any miracles, Jesus didn't know Who He was, Jesus didn't know He was God, birt control is okay, divorce and remarriage are okay, etc. You can even find this stuff being said by cardinals and popes in their private remarks ,(the pope is not infallible unless he is speaking publicly). But unless something is part of the long standing ongoing teaching of the Church, it is not infallible and might even be, and someties is, heretical.

If you really want to know what the Catholic Church teaches, stick to the infallible statements of popes, councils, and Church Fathers, not stuff put out by Vatican II, a non-infallible council, says, or what some random catechism book says.


You really want me to go back, to early Church history?

Maybe talk about how many, taught apokatastasis?

Was just reading yesterday about St Gregory of Nyssen , and of course Origen.

Many, followed the concept of eventual restoration of all. Nope, you do not want to go back there lud. Because what excites me so much, ablut the changes latly happening in the Vatican? Is that I think they might be finally, going back to their roots, and become catholic ( universal) once again!

What you teach, does not resemble early Church Fathers.

You should start reading their stuff.

Then maybe the flip flopping you do, would stop.

12/23/2014 5:08:47 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Origen taught Catholic orthodoxy until toward the end of his life he began to teach universal salvation. Notice that among all the Church Fathers, only he and Terullian are not called saints. (Terullian left the Church and became a Montanist.)

12/23/2014 5:18:59 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


"Firmly hold and never doubt that every baptized person outside of the Catholic Church cannot share in eternal life, if before the end of his life he does not return and is incorporated into the Church." --St. Fulgentius

12/23/2014 7:24:31 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Yes, and this St. Fulgentius was a man, not Jesus, not God.

He has no more authority to say whether I'm saved or not than you do.

12/23/2014 7:33:05 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Quote from ludlowlowell:
"Firmly hold and never doubt that every baptized person outside of the Catholic Church cannot share in eternal life, if before the end of his life he does not return and is incorporated into the Church." --St. Fulgentius


After posting, I re- read your post, and Lud, I believe you are the one who is misinterpreting his meaning.

I think he meant anyone who was baptized into the church, and then "fell away" from God.

The Catholics do not have exclusive rights to God

12/23/2014 8:16:34 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


You know, Msreesi, in re-reading Fulgentius' statement it is clear he is speaking of fallen away Catholics, not people who have never been Catholic. However it has always been the teaching of the Church that only Catholics go to Heaven. The Church also has taught that those ignorant of the Catholic faith through no fault of their own, but who lived a good life with the graces God gave them, can still go to Heaven. But in this day and age with so much information available, who can really claim that?

In any case fallen away Catholics can't claim it. Many fallen away Catholics will wisely turn to the Lord as their death approaches, and they will call a priest who will anoint them, hear their last Confession, and give them one last Communion.

12/23/2014 8:44:10 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Quote from ludlowlowell:
However it has always been the teaching of the Church that only Catholics go to Heaven.


But this is man made teaching. It is faulty and does not line up with what Jesus taught.


Back to Basics of Faith 101 -

John 3:14-17 KJV

14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up:

15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life.

16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.


12/23/2014 9:20:01 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
slowpoke7
Over 2,000 Posts (2,661)
Hendersonville, TN
77, joined Feb. 2011


If the only group of people that will be saved are the ones that go to certain church then what is the fate of those that are not in that group such as Billy Graham, Jack Van Impe and many others that have been preaching from the Bible most of their lives?

12/23/2014 9:44:40 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


If Jack vanImpe and Billy Graham don't convert and become as little children, they cannot enter the Kingdom of God. Jesus said so. And that applies to you and me as well.

I never heard of Jack vanImpe but Billy Graham has preached a once-saved-always-saved gospel all his life, a "gospel" that encourages people to commit sin with impunity. He also has not preached the necessity of attending Mass and receiving Communion devoutly, nor has he preached the necessity of good works. He is one of the false teachers Jesus warned us about, as are all Protestant ministers. Perhaps Billy Graham will convert on his deathbed, as John Wayne and Dutch Schultz did.

12/24/2014 12:18:02 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


Quote from ludlowlowell:
Origen taught Catholic orthodoxy until toward the end of his life he began to teach universal salvation. Notice that among all the Church Fathers, only he and Terullian are not called saints. (Terullian left the Church and became a Montanist.)


What I don't get is, you guys seem to know what douchebags these guys are, and yet you continue to quote from them as if they are Scripture. They are not Scripture.

Yet even your own Catholic sect did not have enough faith in them to include any of their writings in the Scriptures.

Origin was the nutcase who castrated himself. If he did that today he might have been locked up as insane.

12/24/2014 8:07:35 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


"If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out."

12/24/2014 9:25:32 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


Try it.

Then see what mental hospital you end up in.

12/24/2014 5:13:25 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

isna_la_wica
Over 7,500 Posts!! (7,776)
Brantford, ON
63, joined Mar. 2012


Quote from ludlowlowell:
Origen taught Catholic orthodoxy until toward the end of his life he began to teach universal salvation. Notice that among all the Church Fathers, only he and Terullian are not called saints. (Terullian left the Church and became a Montanist.)


Origen lived from 185 to 253/254.

He was Ex- communicated,, thrown into prison and tortured in 232. Sentenced to the stake , was only granted life by the emperor.

I was hoping you would say some thing like you did, simply to make a point.

Origen, also is credited with developing the theory of Logos, Christ became the incarnate word.

And that is still followed :

Paragraph 1. The Son of God Became Man

I. WHY DID THE WORD BECOME FLESH?

456 With the Nicene Creed, we answer by confessing: "For us men and for our salvation he came down from heaven; by the power of the Holy Spirit, he became incarnate of the Virgin Mary, and was made man."

457 The Word became flesh for us in order to save us by reconciling us with God, who "loved us and sent his Son to be the expiation for our sins": "the Father has sent his Son as the Savior of the world", and "he was revealed to take away sins":70

Sick, our nature demanded to be healed; fallen, to be raised up; dead, to rise again. We had lost the possession of the good; it was necessary for it to be given back to us. Closed in the darkness, it was necessary to bring us the light; captives, we awaited a Savior; prisoners, help; slaves, a liberator. Are these things minor or insignificant? Did they not move God to descend to human nature and visit it, since humanity was in so miserable and unhappy a state?71
458 The Word became flesh so that thus we might know God's love: "In this the love of God was made manifest among us, that God sent his only Son into the world, so that we might live through him."72 "For God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life."73

459 The Word became flesh to be our model of holiness: "Take my yoke upon you, and learn from me." "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me."74 On the mountain of the Transfiguration, the Father commands: "Listen to him!"75 Jesus is the model for the Beatitudes and the norm of the new law: "Love one another as I have loved you."76 This love implies an effective offering of oneself, after his example.77

460 The Word became flesh to make us "partakers of the divine nature":78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."81
Catechism of the Catholic Church - "He was conceived by ...
www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p122a3p1.htmvia the Roman Catholic,

You claim, that only via the Roman Catholic church, can truth be found.

Yet, here we have an ex communicated person, hated so much they tortured him, a man hated by the church.

Yet, they still follow his work.

So much for, the Roman Catholic church, never changes its mind, eh?

Now lets look at Origens student, Gregory.

Not only is he a Saint in the Roman Catholic church, but is also considered by them to be one of the "Doctors of the Church".

And what did he teach?

Apokatastasis.

12/24/2014 9:25:44 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Origen was arrested, tortured, and martyred, not by the Church, as Isna implied, but by the Roman pagans, under the pagan emperor Decius, in the year 254 a.d. He did equate the biblical concept of the Word of God ("and the Word took flesh and became man") with the Greek concept of Logos. He taught a lot that was good and true, but sadly slipped into heresy towards the end of his life, teaching that all would be saved, including Satan.

But did he? We have records that contemporary writers said that he said this, but we don't have this in his own writing. The fact that he has never been called a saint is evidence that he slipped into heresy, but not conclusive evidence. There is no record of Origen being excommunicated; I don't know where Isna got that. Yes, he cut his wiener off. Many good Catholics, both at the time and down through the centuries, criticized him for that, but I personally don't see anything wrong with that. Notice he didn't require anybody else to do this.

St. Gregory Nyssan, who was born 50+ years after Origen died, and who lived during the Constantine era (during a time when Christianity was legal), taught that one day all humans would be sinless, and he is right! The souls in Hell will burn for all eternity, but at least they can't sin anymore! That's a bit different from what Origen taught, or supposedly taught.

The study of the Fathers of the Church, sometimes called patristics, is interesting and fascinating, and I recommend it to all. Keep reading up on it, Isna, and as you read about the brave martyrdom of so many of them, ask yourself, would anybody suffer and die.for the watered down mush of Anglicanism or mainline Protestantism?

12/25/2014 9:18:27 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


The patriarchs were Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. They are called the fathers.

The Apostate Catholic church is just mimicking Israel.

See my thread on the early church fathers...

Early Church Fathers Writings
https://DateHookup.dating/Thread-1378101.htm

These writings were not even supported by the Catholic church.

Didn't you say it was the Catholic church who put together the Bible? If so, then why did they not include some of their writings?

Because the Catholic church didn't have much faith in them. And you think we should?

12/25/2014 11:23:05 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


You could say the Catholic Church mimicks Israel. After all, the Church IS the New Israel.

The New Testament is an account of the first generation of Christians. The Fathers of the Church start with the second generation. A continuance.

12/25/2014 10:51:42 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


Again, I must protest. You are taking for granted historical information that has not been verified.

There is nothing in the Scriptures that tells us the "catholic" church will become the "New Israel." There is nothing in the Scriptures that says Israel will be replaced.

The same Israel that is in Genesis is represented in the Book of Revelation. As a matter of fact, there is a warning about any group or church that might try to replace Israel...

CLV Re 2:9 I am aware of your acts and affliction and poverty (but you are rich) and the calumny out of those saying that they themselves are Jews, and they are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.

CLV Re 3:9 Lo! I have granted to those out of the synagogue of Satan, (who are saying that they themselves are Jews, and are not, but are lying)--Lo! I shall be making them that they will be arriving and worshiping, sight before your feet, and they may know that I love you.


Tell me ludlow, are you of the "Synagogue of Satan"?

Is the Catholic church really the "Synagogue of Satan"?

CLV Mk 13:5 Now Jesus, answering, begins to say to them, "Beware that no one should be deceiving you!

CLV Lk 21:8 Now He said, "Beware that you may not be deceived, for many shall be coming in My name, saying that `I am!' and `The season is near!' You may not, then, be going after them.


Is the Catholic church trying to deceive us all?

12/26/2014 2:01:45 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

shylywilling
Over 2,000 Posts (2,748)
Medford, OR
56, joined Jan. 2008


Quote from mindya:
They are perfect for yer feet of clay.




In all seriousness though, the King's dream that Daniel was interpreting depicted feet of both Iron and Clay. A hypocrisy that represents our current capitalistic democracy.

A democracy that is a governing system meant to be pliable to the circumstances and needs of the whole, while Iron (capitalism), however, is rigidly shaped to benefit a specific(individual's), agenda. Today, this is known as the one percent.

The destruction of the statue,(symbolic kingdom) without hand represents the failure of our system from it's own hypocrisy. As we are seeing world wide today, we cannot have a true democracy within the influence of a capitalistic system. In today's United States it takes a fortune to get the exposure needed to become elected into a seat of authority. Hence the elected officials we have are all well off and naturally will concern themselves with protecting their selves and their own kind. Those that have will acquire even more while those that don't will lose even what they don't have. Capitalism is a system of slavery so don't believe it has ended. The wounded head still lives. We must and will eventually recognize this and end the capitalism ourselves. Hopefully sooner then later. Thank you Jesus.

Daniel and Revelation really speak loud to me.

P.S. Another dream had a tree with all living creatures abiding in it until the effects of capitalism/selfishness left it hewed down barren and the kingdom unsheltered and as beasts in the field eating nothing but the withered grass. The Iron ring represents the limiting nature of capitalism which can best be described like a football team that only lets the wealthy quarterback have and keep the ball. Every single play. This team, us, would get our butts beat by a team utilizing all of it's available talent equally. We're not even a close match to a real team effort.

12/26/2014 3:49:44 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


A lot of dreamers dreamed of a more equitable distribution of the world's goodies, only to see the dream become a nightmare where the government owns everything, and begins to think it owns all its citizens.

12/26/2014 4:20:14 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

shylywilling
Over 2,000 Posts (2,748)
Medford, OR
56, joined Jan. 2008




I can't tell if you just described my country today or some other country because in both cases those whom would hoard the resources would be capitalizing on the rest. Dah. You seem to point this out as if to make my point for me lud. Thank you.

12/26/2014 8:46:29 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

elfiegirl
Over 4,000 Posts! (5,513)
Deland, FL
63, joined Nov. 2007


There is no perfect society, never will be until Christ comes again...whenever God chooses.

Until then, we all have to make our own way in this life
into which we are born.

Only by allowing God to rule in our lives can we ever hope to receive and achieve the peace and love He intends to
supply through HIS grace and mercy.

12/26/2014 3:42:41 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


I definitely agree with Elfie's above statement.

Bigd, the Catholic Church won't BECOME the New Israel. It already is. That's the way Jesus set it up when He founded it. Like all the Old Testament prophets prefigured Jesss, the OT Kingdom of Israel prefigured the Church.

12/26/2014 11:10:56 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


Even when the Bible clearly states that there is no "New Israel"?

You must be part of the Synagogue of Satan.

12/27/2014 3:33:36 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Where does the Bible say that there is no New Israel? And why do you. elieve in the Bible anyway---after all it's an anthology of books put together by the Catholic Church, is it not?

12/27/2014 4:52:15 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


Doesn't every Christian sect say that about their church?

Again, you have not proven that there even was a Catholic church when the Bible was written.

12/28/2014 11:26:29 AM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


There was a Church. Jesus specifically said that He was founding a Church. The Church we find, Acts through Revelation, is one, not thousands of denominations. It is an organized body, not a loose invisible fellowship of believers, as the Protestants claim. Peter is clearly the one who makes the decisions or calls the meetings and presides. The Church had bishops,elders (priests), and deacons. The Church gathered on the first day of thw week for the Breaking of the Bread (the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass). The Church of the New Testament is clearly the same as today's Catholic Church.

12/28/2014 1:09:41 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Quote from ludlowlowell:
Jesus specifically said that He was founding a Church. The Church we find, Acts through Revelation, is one, not thousands of denominations


His Church is not your Catholic church. It is the Church made up of all different nations, races, creeds etc. who accept Jesus Christ as their personal Savior.

You put too much faith in the "Catholic church" and not enough in God. In fact, from all of the posts I've read from you, you worship the Catholic belief, rather than God.

We are supposed to keep our eyes on Jesus, not on our church

12/28/2014 1:19:14 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Then why does I Timothy 3:15 call the Church the "pillar and ground of truth"?

12/28/2014 1:26:27 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

furchizedek
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (17,868)
Kingman, AZ
74, joined Sep. 2010


Quote from msreesi:
His Church is not your Catholic church. It is the Church made up of all different nations, races, creeds etc. who accept Jesus Christ as their personal Savior.

You put too much faith in the "Catholic church" and not enough in God. In fact, from all of the posts I've read from you, you worship the Catholic belief, rather than God.

We are supposed to keep our eyes on Jesus, not on our church


Great post, msreesi. I would just expand a bit on your first statement. I would say that everyone in the world who loves God and who does the Father's will is a son or daughter in God's family, as Jesus said:

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." (Matthew 12:50)

"Not every one who says to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven." (Matthew 7:21)

Apparently, not even accepting Jesus as their personal savior is required (at least according to Jesus), but rather simply doing the Father's will is all that's required, namely to love God and love your fellow man on earth.

Just saying. Yes, I know Jesus is the way, the truth and the life and no one goes to the Father but by Him, but that might not mean exactly what some people want it to mean.

12/28/2014 1:28:53 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

furchizedek
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (17,868)
Kingman, AZ
74, joined Sep. 2010


Quote from ludlowlowell:
Then why does I Timothy 3:15 call the Church the "pillar and ground of truth"?


No one knows. In fact no one even knows who wrote 1 Tim. The janitor might have written it on a slow night.

http://carm.org/does-1-timothy-3-15-refute-sola-scriptura

Does 1 Timothy 3:15 refute Sola Scriptura, Scripture Alone?
by Matt Slick

1 Timothy 3:15 does not refute Sola Scriptura. In fact, it supports it. Sola Scriptura is the position that the Old and New Testaments are the final authority in all the topics they address, and that councils and tradition (even the so-called Sacred Tradition of the Roman Catholic and Orthodox Churches) are subordinate to Scripture. Let's take a look at the verse.

1 Timothy 3:15, "but in case I am delayed, I write so that you may know how one ought to conduct himself in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and support of the truth."

Paul says he is writing, so that we might know how to conduct ourselves in the church. Catholics and Orthodox will say that the church (their church) is the pillar and support of the truth. However, there is a very important truth right there in the text. Notice that Paul is appealing to his own writing as the authority. He is writing to them (Scripture), so that they would know how to behave in the household of God. In other words, his writing (which is Scripture) is the thing that is preeminent and to which the church is to subject itself. He says, " . . . I write so that you may know how one ought to conduct himself in the household of God . . . "

If a Roman Catholic or Orthodox Church member wants to appeal to this verse to refute Sola Scriptura, then he is shooting himself in the foot because Paul himself says that his writing, which is Scripture, is what the church is to submit to. Furthermore, he is behaving as a Protestant who holds to the doctrine of Sola Scriptura by appealing to the authority of Scripture.

In addition, he is using the authority of Scripture, in a sense, to refute the idea that Scripture has authority over the church. But, we see from Paul's statement in the verse that his letter is there to tell the church how to behave. In other words, the church is to submit to Scripture--not Scripture to the church. It is not the tradition that informs the word of God but the word of God that informs tradition in the church.

12/28/2014 1:30:28 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Face it, Furch, you have been shown to be wrong.

12/28/2014 1:36:50 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

ludlowlowell
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (36,421)
Panama City, FL
65, joined Feb. 2008


Furchizedek dearly loves the scripture. Oh how he loves the scripture! Until a verse like I Timothy 3:15 comes along that proves his private interpretation to be wrong (see II Peter 1:20 about private interpretation), then he says, oh, um, er, well, maybe the janitor added that one.

12/28/2014 1:42:08 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Quote from ludlowlowell:
Then why does I Timothy 3:15 call the Church the "pillar and ground of truth"?


Because the Church- which IS the Blood bought church of Jesus Christ (and not just any one denomination or sect), IS the pillar and ground of truth.

It's amazing to me how the Catholics twist everything in the Bible to mean themselves only.



[Edited 12/28/2014 1:42:40 PM ]

12/28/2014 2:35:10 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

looptex1
Over 4,000 Posts! (4,616)
Chatsworth, GA
49, joined Jun. 2008


Quote from ludlowlowell:
There was a Church. Jesus specifically said that He was founding a Church. The Church we find, Acts through Revelation, is one, not thousands of denominations. It is an organized body, not a loose invisible fellowship of believers, .

I wonder what Jesus himself taught about this.

That which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the spirit is spirit.
Marvel not that I said ye must be born again.
The wind bloweth where is listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh and whither it goeth, so is EVERY ONE that is born of the spirit.

Seems Jesus himself speaks of that which can't be seen.

Lud put the horse before the cart all the time.

The church was before the priests, deacons, prophets,

12/28/2014 2:37:33 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

louie6332
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,405)
Falkville, AL
75, joined Nov. 2011
online now!


Msreesi, after Father Martin Luther Revolted against the Catholic Church and split, there followed schism after schism in the Protestant ranks, almost all of them over disagreements over the meaning of Scripture. Today there are tens of thousands of Protestant sects and communions worldwide, all claiming the Bible as their authority, but holding to thousands of different and conflicting doctrines. They cannot agree among themselves on what it is that Christ taught. And you refer to this diversity of Protestant doctrine as “the pillar and ground of truth”? Are you intellectually and willfully blind? What it is is a scandal to all looking into Protestantism. And Catholics cannot see how such scandalous diversity of doctrine can possibly be labeled a “reform” of the Church.

How can Protestants pretend to be following Christ when they ignore his doctrine or twist the literal meaning into their own doctrine? I have actually had some Protestants claim that this diversity of doctrine is a good thing. Our Lord disagrees. He said that a house divided cannot stand. In any case, diversity of doctrine is the exact opposite of "The pillow and ground of truth". For whenever two doctrines contradict each other, at least one of them is necessarily false. False doctrine is referred to as heresy, which is why Our Lord, in the Catholic revelations, sometimes refers to the Protestant Sects as "heretical Churches". In fact, all Protestant Sects are founded upon two Lutheran heresies: (1) Bible as sole authority, and (2) one need do nothing to obtain salvation, that Christ has done everything, and all one has to do is accept it as a free gift. Neither of these Protestant doctrines are found in Christ or the prophets, and is contradicted by Christ and the original apostles and the prophets in the Bible.

Louie

12/28/2014 2:53:00 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

looptex1
Over 4,000 Posts! (4,616)
Chatsworth, GA
49, joined Jun. 2008


Quote from ludlowlowell:
Furchizedek dearly loves the scripture. Oh how he loves the scripture! Until a verse like I Timothy 3:15 comes along that proves his private interpretation to be wrong (see II Peter 1:20 about private interpretation), then he says, oh, um, er, well, maybe the janitor added that one.

1st, peter says nothing about anything being forbidden.
Lud, as do other Catholics, love to use this verse and claim it says private interpretation is forbidden.

Yet the word forbidden, can't, cannot, should not, is not even mentioned in this verse.

So why they think it is forbidding anything is beyond me, maybe their smoking dope.

For the refuse to take the very next verse that explains exactly what is meant by, " no prophesy of the scripture is of private interpretation"

But nope, they can't have that.

They then have to run to, " it doesn't have to be in the bible, it only has to be taught by the church"

See, they love the scriptures to, but when they want to do something against what the scriptures teach, orteach something that iisn't in the scripture, they scream sola scriptureand one must aabandon that immediately.

They will even quote "sayings" from people of the catholic church and that out weighs the word of God.

One can find where some of these same people have been quoted as changing their beliefs, then the Catholics say it hear say instead of their own writings.

They really got it going on.
They quote from scripture when it suits them.
They misinterpret scripture to suit them.
They ignore scripture if it doesn't suit them.
They use "sayings" from other bishops and popes as long as they agree with them.
Then they ignore then same people when it doesn't.

Now if you want pick and choose, there it is.
Pick what you want, ignore what you want, add what you want..

12/28/2014 2:58:46 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

looptex1
Over 4,000 Posts! (4,616)
Chatsworth, GA
49, joined Jun. 2008


Quote from louie6332:
Msreesi, after Father Martin Luther Revolted against the Catholic Church and split, there followed schism after schism in the Protestant ranks, almost all of them over disagreements over the meaning of Scripture. Today there are tens of thousands of Protestant sects and communions worldwide, all claiming the Bible as their authority, but holding to thousands of different and conflicting doctrines. They cannot agree among themselves on what it is that Christ taught. And you refer to this diversity of Protestant doctrine as “the pillar and ground of truth”? Are you intellectually and willfully blind? What it is is a scandal to all looking into Protestantism. And Catholics cannot see how such scandalous diversity of doctrine can possibly be labeled a “reform” of the Church.

How can Protestants pretend to be following Christ when they ignore his doctrine or twist the literal meaning into their own doctrine? I have actually had some Protestants claim that this diversity of doctrine is a good thing. Our Lord disagrees. He said that a house divided cannot stand. In any case, diversity of doctrine is the exact opposite of "The pillow and ground of truth". For whenever two doctrines contradict each other, at least one of them is necessarily false. False doctrine is referred to as heresy, which is why Our Lord, in the Catholic revelations, sometimes refers to the Protestant Sects as "heretical Churches". In fact, all Protestant Sects are founded upon two Lutheran heresies: (1) Bible as sole authority, and (2) one need do nothing to obtain salvation, that Christ has done everything, and all one has to do is accept it as a free gift. Neither of these Protestant doctrines are found in Christ or the prophets, and is contradicted by Christ and the original apostles and the prophets in the Bible.

Louie

So what, all the Protestants disagree here and there on scriptures.

So do you catholics.

Difference is were admit we disagree, you pretend y'all don't.

You lie to yourselves, and remember all liar a shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone.

12/28/2014 3:17:09 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Quote from looptex1:
So what, all the Protestants disagree here and there on scriptures.

So do you catholics.

Difference is were admit we disagree, you pretend y'all don't.

You lie to yourselves, and remember all liar a shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone.


Louie, read the 4 Gospels- Matthew, Mark, Luke and John- they each saw the same events while walking with Christ, yet saw them things differently from each other. That didn't mean that they were in discord, they just each saw things in their own way. It's called perspective, and we can all have a different perspective.

I guarantee that your thoughts are not the same as other Catholics, and I guarantee that Loop's aren't the same as mine, or mine his, but we see and consider each other's point of view. That's how you learn and grow. But you won't learn and grow if you shut everyone out by closing your mind.

12/28/2014 4:08:09 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

bigd9832
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (21,824)
Chicago, IL
64, joined Oct. 2007


Quote from ludlowlowell:
There was a Church. Jesus specifically said that He was founding a Church. The Church we find, Acts through Revelation, is one, not thousands of denominations. It is an organized body, not a loose invisible fellowship of believers, as the Protestants claim. Peter is clearly the one who makes the decisions or calls the meetings and presides. The Church had bishops,elders (priests), and deacons. The Church gathered on the first day of thw week for the Breaking of the Bread (the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass). The Church of the New Testament is clearly the same as today's Catholic Church.


More wild unfounded claims?

Yes, Jesus spoke of a church. Whet He did NOT speak of was a "catholic" church.

And there were sects just like there are today...

CLV 1C 3:4 For whenever anyone may be saying, "I, indeed, am of Paul," yet another, "I, of Apollos," will he not be fleshly?

Whenever you concentrate on your sect, like you do many times here, the Bible teaches that you are being fleshly.

There is no "catholic" church in the bible. I have accepted Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior so I am part of His church, no matter what sect I associate myself with,

You are clearly insane.

12/28/2014 4:12:42 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

louie6332
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,405)
Falkville, AL
75, joined Nov. 2011
online now!


Msreesi, an “open mind” becomes a trashcan for any thought passing by. Today, there are many false interpretations and false teachings and false opinions being widely discriminated and bantered about. Satan has tried to muddy the waters that way. So discernment is necessary. This has always been the case, but never to the extent as today, for we are today in the period of the Apocalypse, during which Satan has been granted the time and the power to test all men on Earth and to try to destroy the Church.

Today demons roam the world like furies trying to deceive even the elect if that were possible. So today, one has to use discernment. One doctrine, believe it or not, is NOT as good as any other, for when two doctrines contradict each other, at least one of them is necessarily false. So one must constantly test all things, and let in only those things that are self consistent, consistent with all known facts, and consistent with one’s internal psychological frame of reference. For an inconsistent psychological frame of reference does not give one comport or mental peace, it makes the gears of the mind grind together. Men and women of good will always seek truth with a honest mind and sincere heart, and when they find it they embrace it and make it their own. And they presume nothing, they are always testing opinions and teachings to see if they correspond with truth.

You are suggesting that there is good in every belief system, and that everyone should consider everyone else’s opinion and pick and choose from those opinions what one will believe. But that is not how it works. The literal meaning of divine revelation should be your guide in matters of religion. Every wonder how tens of thousands of different Protestant Sects can interpret the Bible to get thousands of different and conflicting doctrines? It is because they do NOT take it literally, they twist the literal meaning to mean whatever they WANT it to mean. But when they do that, it is no longer God’s word, but their own word. The rule is, don’t bastardize God’s word by twisting the literal meaning, take it literally, for God is not a liar, he says what he means and means what he says.

Louie

12/28/2014 4:18:01 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Whatever, Louie, whatever.

Think what you want.

Oh wait! I do have a question....which of the disciples who wrote the Gospels were wrong?



[Edited 12/28/2014 4:20:16 PM ]

12/28/2014 4:27:47 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

louie6332
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,405)
Falkville, AL
75, joined Nov. 2011
online now!


BigD, you claim to “have accepted Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior”, but you reject his doctrine. But you can’t have it both ways, a rejection of his doctrine IS a rejection of him. Remember the man dying and appearing before the throne of Our Lord, claiming to be a Christian, and Our Lord saying to him: I never knew you, away from me you evildoer into the fires prepared for the Devil, or whatever?

I told you before that the Holy Spirit described the Church established by Christ as “Catholic and apostolic” in the Apostles Creed, which he dictated to the Apostles just before Pentecost, which is consider by the Church to be the birthday of the Church.

Oh, I know, I know, the Apostle’s Creed is not in the Bible, so it is Pagan or man-made or whatever. But your Lutheran doctrine of “Bible as sole authority”, which you are constantly using in your arguments, if accepted must at once be rejected, because it itself is found nowhere in the Bible, and is explicitly contradicted by the Bible. It is therefore necessarily false. Where in the Bible does it say that all of God’s revelations is in the Bible, that if it is not in the Bible it is false, man-made, Pagan, or whatever? NOWHERE! In fact it explicitly CONTRADICTS this by mentioning divine revelation that is not in the Bible. Don’t you realize that when you use a necessarily false premise in your arguments that your conclusion is invalid and that it makes you look like a fool?

Louie

12/28/2014 4:46:48 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

louie6332
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,405)
Falkville, AL
75, joined Nov. 2011
online now!


Msreesi, you ask “which of the disciples who wrote the Gospels were wrong?” Excuse me Msreesi, but where did I say in my post that any of the Apostles who wrote the Gospels were wrong? Christ is teaching the same doctrine in all of them. You apparently misunderstood what I was saying.

Louie

12/28/2014 5:09:52 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  
msreesi
Over 2,000 Posts (2,785)
Stout, OH
54, joined Jul. 2014


Louie, I didn't misunderstand a thing.

I had asked in my post, but in your long reply you did not answer of how Matthew, Mark. Luke and John could walk with Jesus, see the same things and yet see and record what they saw differently.

12/28/2014 6:49:02 PM I've Got These Rubber Sandals  

looptex1
Over 4,000 Posts! (4,616)
Chatsworth, GA
49, joined Jun. 2008


Quote from louie6332:


I told you before that the Holy Spirit described the Church established by Christ as “Catholic and apostolic” in the Apostles Creed, which he dictated to the Apostles just before Pentecost, which is consider by the Church to be the birthday of the Church.

Louie

Yes it is odd,
You claim this "apostle creed" was revealed unto them just before Pentecost.

1st problem with that is that the spirit had not come yet, so exactly how did it reveal it.

You do remember that Jesus told them to go to Jerusalem and tarry till ye have been endued with power from on high.

That was the power of the holy ghost which was coming, which the prophet Joel spoke of and peter proclaimed on the day of Pentecost that is was here.

He said, this is that spoken of by the prophet Joel.

You do remember that don't you Louie?

So see, even peter, the Pope himself is in disagreement with you that the spirit had come earlier than the day of Pentecost.

Maybe that's why he nor any of the other apostles speak of this, because it didn't happen as YOU say it did.

But, lets pretend for a minute it did.
Do you recall Jesus telling them, go forth and teach them EVERYTHING I have told you.

Now surely, even though all Christ said and done isn't written, surely the spirit revealing unto them that the church was "catholic and apostolic" surely that was important enough to at least mention once.

I mean get real, your gonna say this was reveal just shortly before Pentecost and it isn't even mentioned to the 3000 that was added that day.
.had they already fail in teaching the first group of believers what the spirit had revealed?

Na, they did exactly what they were supposed to do. They preached Jesus and him crucified, and even spoke of the spirit coming just as was prophesied, not before.

But then again, you do like to add to the word and you can't stand using the word to correct, reproof, instruct, your against use it unless its the verses you agree with.
Then its, the bible means what it say, take it literally.
Well literally, the bible says ye do err not know the scriptures.
It did not say anyone has ever erred not knowing what the pope said, what the king said or what wasn't written in the scriptures said.

So take it literally and believe the Bible when it says, ye do err not knowing the scriptures.
Throw all you are quotes from Agnes's, Argentine, Augustus and anyone else you so much adore, throw them away and grasp hold of the one thing the word says you err not knowing.

Now that I think of it, that is sola scripture, yep the bible itself does support using the scriptures, and the bible itself says you err not knowing it.
The bible itself does not say you err not knowing anything else.
How many different ways can I say this, would it make any difference?
Probably not because you err not knowing the scriptures and cry it doesn't have to be in the bible it just has to be taught....