FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!

7/14/2016 8:59:29 AM	FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	The whole system from the White House down to the local elected dog catcher is crooked and needs to be fixed.The meeting between lynch and sex fiend clintoon should be enough to have lynch charged with obstruction of justice. Semper Fi !!! In an unusual move, FBI agents working the Hillary Clinton email case had to sign a special form reminding them not to blab about the probe to anyone unless called to testify. Sources said they had never heard of the “Case Briefing Acknowledgment” form being used before, although all agents must initially sign nondisclosure agreements to obtain security clearance. “This is very, very unusual. I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others,” said one retired FBI chief. An FBI agent currently on the job admitted, “I have never heard of such a form. Sounds strange.” Meanwhile, FBI agents expressed their “disappointment” over FBI Director James Comey’sdecision not to recommend charges against Clinton, sources close to the matter told The Post. “FBI agents believe there was an inside deal put in place after the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting,” said one source. Another source from the Justice Department was “furious” with Comey, saying he’s “managed to piss off right and left.” Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
7/15/2016 7:15:17 PM	FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!
rcrmike Souderton, PA 58, joined Apr. 2009	We need to inquire, no demand, what the FBI's intention was, to "interview" Hillary-the-Criminal WITHOUT having her under oath or require a transcriber, or recording device. Where's our record to prosecute? The FBI is guilty of collusion to interfere with justice! Comey needs to be fired, then prosecuted himself. How does one prosecute if the suspect lies to them and they have no proof of what the criminal said and no lawful statement that the criminal perjures herself if caught in a lie? There is no law regulating lying or not recollecting correctly UNLESS one is under oath. ONLY then can one perjure themself. Any lowlife drug dealer is placed under oath and recorded while questioned/interrogated. Professional politicians lie every day. It's NOT against the law to lie, just not ethical. Perjury is a crime only when under oath. Otherwise it never happened. Hillary is a liar AND a politician. She deserves to be beheaded, twice! Lynch deserves the same as Comey. If she had immediately recused herself, I could have overlooked her questionable and unethical meeting. But she didn't. One could easily jump to the conclusion that there was a conspiracy to fumble the indictment. Collusion all around. An insider whistleblower is our only hope of finding out. Was Lynch given a death threat or a bag full of cash? Maybe an offer of future employment. Is a bribe or enticement a felony? What is the penalty for not recusing yourself? The entire justice system has been undermined. Why should anyone trust the Department of Justice AND the FBI organization? America has lost faith in all three branches of government. Plus the forth branch of the press. Now we have lost the internal federal departments and agencies. What's the point of continuing? It isn't going to fix itself.
7/15/2016 8:25:08 PM	FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!
stargazzer Creighton, NE 68, joined Feb. 2007	If Trump becomes president I hope he says your fired a lot in every department and not just the top one but several deep, Take the size of the IRS he should fire hundreds just in it also not replace them in numbers either.
7/16/2016 9:45:40 AM	FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	Quote from rcrmike: We need to inquire, no demand, what the FBI's intention was, to "interview" Hillary-the-Criminal WITHOUT having her under oath or require a transcriber, or recording device. Where's our record to prosecute? The FBI is guilty of collusion to interfere with justice! Comey needs to be fired, then prosecuted himself. How does one prosecute if the suspect lies to them and they have no proof of what the criminal said and no lawful statement that the criminal perjures herself if caught in a lie? There is no law regulating lying or not recollecting correctly UNLESS one is under oath. ONLY then can one perjure themself. Any lowlife drug dealer is placed under oath and recorded while questioned/interrogated. Professional politicians lie every day. It's NOT against the law to lie, just not ethical. Perjury is a crime only when under oath. Otherwise it never happened. Hillary is a liar AND a politician. She deserves to be beheaded, twice! Lynch deserves the same as Comey. If she had immediately recused herself, I could have overlooked her questionable and unethical meeting. But she didn't. One could easily jump to the conclusion that there was a conspiracy to fumble the indictment. Collusion all around. An insider whistleblower is our only hope of finding out. Was Lynch given a death threat or a bag full of cash? Maybe an offer of future employment. Is a bribe or enticement a felony? What is the penalty for not recusing yourself? The entire justice system has been undermined. Why should anyone trust the Department of Justice AND the FBI organization? America has lost faith in all three branches of government. Plus the forth branch of the press. Now we have lost the internal federal departments and agencies. What's the point of continuing? It isn't going to fix itself. Mike I couldn't agree more.This chain of corruption needs to come to a sudden stop and safeguards put in place so this can never happen again. Semper Fi !!!
7/16/2016 9:51:12 AM	FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	Quote from stargazzer: If Trump becomes president I hope he says your fired a lot in every department and not just the top one but several deep, Take the size of the IRS he should fire hundreds just in it also not replace them in numbers either. I hope he goes far beyond saying "your fired".I hope he pushes congress to prosecute the whole freaking bunch of them,I also hope he sees fit to eliminate several of the three letter suck hole agencies along with a bunch of government employees that are NOT needed.To many of them are leeches who are sponging off the tax payers. Semper Fi !!!
7/16/2016 10:17:01 AM	FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	they do need to be charged and convicted, otherwise they will be on the unemployed dole forever. it is next to impossible to FIRE a government employee.
7/16/2016 11:50:29 AM	FBI Believes There Was An Inside Deal--WELL DUH!!
rcrmike Souderton, PA 58, joined Apr. 2009	We may not be able to fire an employee, but we can successfully close the federal departments where they work. We need to read the US Constitution. It's the federal rulebook. It's purpose was to define the limitations on the federal authority, NOT of the states and People. The federal government has 17 specific responsibilities and authority given to it by the states and People who created it. If an agency's purpose is outside of those DEFINED authorizations it is null and void. See Article I, Section 8. We also just cut our federal budget simultaneously. We also kicked the Congress out of DC for most of the year. There isn't that much workload for them to be addressing. They need to be at home, accountable to their Citizens. They will also require a real job to support themselves, as a US Congressman is not necessarily a fulltime endeavor. We should be practical as well as forward-looking. Some federal agencies might be viewed as necessary and valuable to some. If that is the case, we should allow each state to take on those responsibilities as they see fit. If valuable, great! If not, why should we pay for them? Some states might run their department efficiently and lawfully, some not. Each state will be an example to each other how to run things, as well as how not to. States can experiment with these agency duties as they wish. The voters can elect and not elect examples of good and bad judgment. Keep in mind that each colony was a Nation State. They had their own government. They only formed a union of states for their common 17 interests, but never to rule over them. How's that working out today? Somebody is in violation of their job description and needs to be fired!

skipthegames sex

megapersonls