|
skipthegames sexMy best buddy meet her soulmate in Tinder and still going sturdy. asian dating houston tx Identical here, people don t comprehend this virus so they push us away. We will reject these apps unless they deliver a one of a kind, high quality expertise. benaughyy I would genuinely query the self esteem/respect and naivety of any woman who used these kind of apps. craigslist alternative for hookupsA lady got me in this position so I am not prepared to throw my worm out in the lake once more for a lengthy time. craigslist anna il Buckle up for genuine life, genuine insane stories of epic dating disasters, on Correct Dating Stories. It provides people today who are speed meeting a bit of privacy. mocospace gold hack If the exact same individual also swipes suitable on your profile, it s a match, and the dating app will let you know. Home Sign In Search Date Ideas Join Forums Singles Groups - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!
10/22/2016 11:47:14 AM |
A bit of election history |
|
purplerider1200
South Bend, IN
61, joined Aug. 2011
|
In the entire history of presidential elections, the party in power rarely holds it longer than 8 years. This goes back all the way to George Washington. A few really outstanding presidents were able to put their party successor into office after their 8 years were up. Those who did, were in good economic times. The sitting president was well liked by all. Franklin Roosevelt, of course, was a wartime president, but he did manage to lead the country out of the depression. Then Truman was in the economic boom after ww2. It's pretty safe to say that we're neigher, right now. Methinks that the dems know this, and are doing everything possible to undermine Trump. Now, with healthcare imploding like most good economists said it would, crooked killary and her shenanigans being smoked out, I'd say that we are not in great times.
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
10/22/2016 12:54:41 PM |
A bit of election history |
|
sureshot40
Drumright, OK
48, joined Apr. 2011
|
Good point but this election will have the biggest voter fraud ever and that can make a big difference especially in the right states.
Dems have already been caught red handed bussing paid agitators into Trumps rallies. I bet they will bus in paid illegal voters as well.
|
10/22/2016 7:43:14 PM |
A bit of election history |
|
purplerider1200
South Bend, IN
61, joined Aug. 2011
|
I won't argue that. Even in my own county, several have been convicted of voter fraud in the 2012 election. But I also believe a lot of phycology is going on. How better to fight voter fraud? By tracking down those who do it is one way. Another, is to try to overwhelm the fraud by getting people mobilized to get out to vote. Many have said the turnout will be low. I don't believe that for one second.The liberal media has been pushing the"Killary will win by a landslide" crap. The underlying (Hey!I like that word)reason is to discourage Trump voters from bothering to get out to vote. The thought might be there, but I got a hunch people just might not play into their psychology.Both the German chancellor, and the Brexit vote defied the pollsters. Then consider Gallop polls. They screwed up badly four years ago by saying that Romney was ahead in the polls. This time around, they won't touch it. Just the other night Newt Gingrich was comparing liberal media to the russian pollitt bureau. Propaganda at it's finest. Now, how many times have you heard about Trump rallies in big auditoriums, filled to capacity, with others wanting to come in-but can't. Go look at a killary rally in- of all places, a basketball gym. (And not crowded at that.) Even bernie is pissed about the superdelegate garbage. I believe if the playing field were level, we be looking at crazy bernie as the dem nominee. At least he was an admitted communist. About a year ago, I saw killary's campaign manager say that she was a Marxist democrat. That, I saw on PMSNBC. What I want to know, is who missed that one?
|
10/23/2016 10:27:52 PM |
A bit of election history |
|
driver406
Saint Paul, MN
65, joined Oct. 2009
|
Dems were in power 5 terms from 33-53. Reps were in power 4 terms from 1896-1913. With the exception of Cleveland's terms and Wilson's terms the Reps were in power from 1861-1933.
But since WW II no party has won 3 elections in a row except the Reps in 80 84 88. The Dems haven't done it since the Depression 32 36 40 44 48. If this holds, then Trump ought to be elected, but Real Clear politics says Hillary is well ahead. I still think the election will be decided in the last two weeks and the trend may not show up in any polls. As Joan used to say "We'll just have to wait and see!"
The Reps are working harder to defeat Trump than Hillary is and if Hillary wins the Reps will blame Trump for the loss instead of themselves.
[Edited 10/23/2016 10:29:20 PM ]
|
10/26/2016 8:51:19 PM |
A bit of election history |
|
purplerider1200
South Bend, IN
61, joined Aug. 2011
|
Dems were in power 5 terms from 33-53. Reps were in power 4 terms from 1896-1913. With the exception of Cleveland's terms and Wilson's terms the Reps were in power from 1861-1933.
But since WW II no party has won 3 elections in a row except the Reps in 80 84 88. The Dems haven't done it since the Depression 32 36 40 44 48. If this holds, then Trump ought to be elected, but Real Clear politics says Hillary is well ahead. I still think the election will be decided in the last two weeks and the trend may not show up in any polls. As Joan used to say "We'll just have to wait and see!"
The Reps are working harder to defeat Trump than Hillary is and if Hillary wins the Reps will blame Trump for the loss instead of themselves.
^^^^ A lot of things just aren't adding up. Trump rallies draw thousands, Clinton's, hundreds.(Maybe) Just who are they polling? If new republican voter registrations are way up, then why isn't that showing up on the polls? Early voting is showing strong republican turnout. In the past, dems used to benefit a lot by that, but they aren't this time around. Repubs did even things up on election day. If you totaled up primary numbers by party, (Added up all candidate votes by party) Republicans outnumbered Dems by a pretty wide margin. 70% think the country is going in the wrong direction. Killary wants this to be Odumbo's third term. They claim he's popular. So how come I can't find one person that likes that idiot? He's about as popular as a fart in an elevator.
|
10/27/2016 10:05:58 AM |
A bit of election history |
|
tileman1814
Kalispell, MT
66, joined Nov. 2007
|
^^^^ A lot of things just aren't adding up. Trump rallies draw thousands, Clinton's, hundreds.(Maybe) Just who are they polling? If new republican voter registrations are way up, then why isn't that showing up on the polls? Early voting is showing strong republican turnout. In the past, dems used to benefit a lot by that, but they aren't this time around. Repubs did even things up on election day. If you totaled up primary numbers by party, (Added up all candidate votes by party) Republicans outnumbered Dems by a pretty wide margin. 70% think the country is going in the wrong direction. Killary wants this to be Odumbo's third term. They claim he's popular. So how come I can't find one person that likes that idiot? He's about as popular as a fart in an elevator.
Sure it doesn't add up,the liberal media is tweaking all of the poll numbers along with the numbers of people showing up at rallies.More for clintoon and less for Trump.The whole thing is a joke.
Semper Fi !!!
|
10/27/2016 11:56:33 AM |
A bit of election history |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
here is just an other history lesson........
Scott Baio
8:02am ·
Did you know????
Some Clinton connection I just discovered.
So Chelsea is married to George SOROS nephew.
Also, about 6 months before the Iran deal went through, John Kerry's daughter married an Iranian Muslim; meaning his daughter is now in Islam and their grandchildren will be Islamic.
Hillary's three top aides are Muslims and two are connected to the Muslim brotherhood.
Are we getting the picture yet and what will happen unless Trump is elected?
The Clinton - Mezvinksy - Soros Connection
Edward Mezvinsky was born January 17, 1937.
Then you'll probably say, "Who is Ed Mezvinsky?" Well, he is a former Democrat congressman who represented Iowa's 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977. He sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of Richard Nixon.
He was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to politics and the nation and should be impeached.
He and the Clintons were friends and very politically intertwined for many years.
Ed Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue Margolies and later married her after his wife divorced him.
In 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in Congress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton's controversial tax package through the House of Representatives.
In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Ed Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams. He was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison. After serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in April 2008 and remains on federal probation.
To this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims.
About now you are saying, "So what!"
Well, this is Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky.
That's right; Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton's father-in law. Clintons staying at Soros Family home during Chelsea’s wedding Now Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased a 10.5 million dollar NYC apartment (after being married in George Soros' mansion).
Has anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media? {And now you have a brief insight into how the Committee's billionaire elite control the politics and direction of nations - Ed.}
If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or better yet, Sarah Palin's daughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline and every detail would be reported over and over. And yet liberals say there are no double standards in political reporting.
And people are already talking about Hillary as our next President!
|
10/27/2016 10:26:58 PM |
A bit of election history |
|
purplerider1200
South Bend, IN
61, joined Aug. 2011
|
I've heard that things could change when obamacare's increases start showing up. Indiana, was supposed to be only 18%. A friend of mine just got their new increase news- It was $432 a month. Starting next year, $711 a month. My math says about 70% (Give or take a few percent because I just don't feel like doing accurate math) He, is at least fortunate that his wife is going on medicare in march. So, that increase, however costly, won't hit them too hard.(It still sucks) Just think of those people who KNOW their's is going to double next year. It wouldn't surprise me if some see 2-300% increase. I hope the roof caves in on killary.
|
10/29/2016 5:10:39 PM |
A bit of election history |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
darn scary!
|
|
|