But would the good Dr. here win that debate; probably not and he may know that!

There's not a religion on this planet that tells it's followers that it's "OK" to FORCE their beliefs on others.

If I were stupid enough to actually want a woman involved in my life for anything other than sexual gratification, I would still have a better chance of getting in their pants than your bootlicking ass.

Listen Phillip, it is Phillip right?
Comparing jock sizes between me and enigma is a really gay thing to do. We are real men and have no need to that ourselves. But if you prefer his jock knocker bcuz you think it bigger and packs more meat is then that's your prerogative and more power to you.
As for my post, it's OK to disagree, most of us will at times. So express yourself about whatever you disagree with and stop with the Sesame Street pot shots. You're to damn old for that and it's not scoring you any points with any females who disagrees also.
Not one woman in here will give you their number based on your 4th grade attacks on me. Or maybe you prefer the fellas? Huh?

Seems I've gotten under your thin skin; you've been called out here and yet you don't respond properly. Name calling don't bother me but does you. You show complete ignorance for people who disagree with you just like Mizgal from Minnesota; so into yourselves that you dance around the issue you've posted. Your mind is already made up so this is an incredible waste of time on your part being biased.

If I were stupid enough to actually want a woman involved in my life for anything other than sexual gratification, I would still have a better chance of getting in their pants than your bootlicking ass.

I guess you forgot you're on a Dating website which means in the not so distant old days when Dustin still owned it, him and his moderators would have pulled this thread from Sex and Dating or send you an email to move this in the politics forum for being off topic which essentially you are. There were some mods and posters would would flood this thread for being off topic of forum title. Deletion of thread or you would follow doc. You choose to be part of the problem with no solution just blathering which got old after page 3. Since insults is all you have left to defend your position, I know you'll take the Cowards way out and block anyone who disagrees with you. I'm just surprised you haven't blocked me yet; but on the other hand blocking is for losers and people who will never convince anyone of there true colors lotsa luck doc and keep fighting that uphill lost cause of yours I'm out due to me enjoying life not being bitter about it!

Only.if they are wearing pants large enough to cover their boots.

Last time I checked, even when I can tee off to a Par 4 from the back of their hips or a** cheeks, they still try to wear leggings.

Hate to say it, but their pants may say "Yoga", but their asses say "McDonald's".

So, you would be pretty hard pressed to find one with baggy clothes, that is not only attracted to women and has a full head of hair.

So, whatever pants you are getting into, probably ain't worth bragging about anyway.

Oh I don't need to come back to remember that terrible a** trend. I grew up in the type of neighborhood where those trends started.

I feel my screaming all the time: LEGGINGS ARE NOT PANTS!

A PE teacher at the local community college had to go on a monologue on the first day about what was appropriate attire.

"I don't care how gorgeous you are and how amazing your body is: cover it up. You can't assume your classmates want to see it just because you're willing to show it."

She went in even more but was waiting to literally see all the women she was talking to not listen.

I can understand wanting to be and feel sexy when you're working out but... I want to be comfortable. To each his own.

And it's sad because even the girls with little to NO booty thinks it's okay simply because they're small.

NO. LEGGINGS ARE NOT F**KING TIGHTS.

Remember the Latino Festival in New York some years ago? When several women were sexually attacked in broad daylight?

These women (about 7-10) came to the festival in panties only or butt a** naked. Walking through crowds that was so tightly packed ppl were "elbow to elbow" and barely had room to move around. Then complained when they were sexually fondled, finger-popped and whatever else happened.

They thought bcuz the law says "No matter what you're wearing, even if naked, NO ONE has the right to touch you in an uninvited fashion..." that it was a GOOD MORAL JUDGEMENT and ETHICALLY ACCEPTABLE to go to a crowded public festival naked and in panties ONLY.

Now can ANYONE TELL ME that their morality and "right vs wrong" judgement WASN'T based on law/gov't?

Remember the Latino Festival in New York some years ago? When several women were sexually attacked in broad daylight?

These women (about 7-10) came to the festival in panties only or butt a** naked. Walking through crowds that was so tightly packed ppl were "elbow to elbow" and barely had room to move around. Then complained when they were sexually fondled, finger-popped and whatever else happened.

They thought bcuz the law says "No matter what you're wearing, even if naked, NO ONE has the right to touch you in an uninvited fashion..." that it was a GOOD MORAL JUDGEMENT and ETHICALLY ACCEPTABLE to go to a crowded public festival naked and in panties ONLY.

Now can ANYONE TELL ME that their morality and "right vs wrong" judgement WASN'T based on law/gov't?

If you see Lamborghini on the street with an open door and the keys in the ignition and you always wanted to have one, would you take it for a ride without asking the owner? It's against the law, right? The same is with the woman's body - do not touch it until you have the permission of the owner.

No I wouldn't take it but that's just me. The whole damn world doesn't think and do as I do either. So if I owned a Lamborghini and it meant something to me I wouldn't leave the keys in it and open on the streets HOPING AND WISHING the next person who comes along will do as I would.

Again we go back to worshipping. Bcuz only someone who has "faith" in that which they worship would put themselves in that kinda situation believing their God would protect them.

Why do you think ppl lock their doors at night and when they're gone, have alarms to set and lick their car doors when they're not in them? Why do banks, markets, pharmacies, stores, restaurants and shopping malls ALL lick up and secure their businesses at night? Why do you close and lock your doors at nite when you're sleeping? Hug?

For the same reason those girls SHOULD NOT HAVE gone out in ONLY panties and some naked in a crowded public festival. And if asked why they would risk their lives like that and their answer is ABOUT THE LAW it evident that's we push-up at its best.

Try at least to be realistic.

Just like they did with divorce laws, gay laws and changing discipline into abuse so they can control how other ppl parent their children.

They girl scouts are now protesting the boy scouts so females can be boy scouts. They claim they wanna go camping just like the boys do. Do you they have to join the boys to do that? Why can't they just go on their own or all go together? Why force an intrusion?

See they use the camping thing as an excuse to cross the lines. Just like women used the "equal rights" excuse to intrude in on a man's place in the home.

Quote this, for ivaiva:

If you owned a Lamborghini, would you leave it with the Windows down, doors unlocked, and the keys in the ignition?

Because I have news for you, you do that and someone steals your car, the police will charge YOU for Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle(Joyriding) and they will NOT charge the car thief, because YOU gave the thief access to the vehicle.

So, point and case, if you are a woman and you don't want men staring at your tits, or coping a feel on certain areas of the body, DO NOT give them access to it.

Those women did nothing more than behave in a completely illogical process, to do nothing more than give Feminists MORE reason to promote hatred of men.

Female Logic: Teach men to stop acting like men, then sit around and whine how there are no "good" men left in the world....

No I see your point and it's ridiculous. Don't put yourself, your kids or your property at risk gambling on what others SHOULD NOT DO! Bcuz it could cost you your life or the life of your children and/or everything you own acting stupid.

Do you lock your doors at night when you and your kids are sleep? Or do you leave doors and windows open bcuz other ppl SHOULD NOT come in while you're sleeping?

And when you leave out do you lock your doors and secure your home? Or do you leave your doors wide open with all your valuables inside bcuz other ppl SHOULD NOT go in your home and steal?

Well?

No I see your point and it's ridiculous. Don't put yourself, your kids or your property at risk gambling on what others SHOULD NOT DO! Bcuz it could cost you your life or the life of your children and/or everything you own acting stupid.

Do you lock your doors at night when you and your kids are sleep? Or do you leave doors and windows open bcuz other ppl SHOULD NOT come in while you're sleeping?

And when you leave out do you lock your doors and secure your home? Or do you leave your doors wide open with all your valuables inside bcuz other ppl SHOULD NOT go in your home and steal?

Well?

Why should women read the Bible?

...right, because men are such pious christians.

Some of the greatest attrocities of mankind have been committed in the name of god and the bible and not just by women.

Besides, I have no interest in understanding all men that deeply. I was only interested in understanding the men I considered as potential partners and now, only the individual man to whom I am committed.

As I've already stated..."mankind" (people..not one gender)..have committed attrocities.

It is ridiculous to advise women to "read the bible to learn about men". The bible is full of interesting stories, sage advise and spiritual recomendations but lots of people are not christian and were not raised according to biblical teachings so how is a bible going to teach women about men or men about women if it's outside their own belief system?

You stated MEN sarcastically at being such "pious christians" Soul. Please do not attempt to brush this off, as you meant MANKIND

It is ridiculous to advise women to "read the bible to learn about men". The bible is full of interesting stories, sage advise and spiritual recomendations but lots of people are not christian and were not raised according to biblical teachings so how is a bible going to teach women about men or men about women if it's outside their own belief system?

The point is if the woman or the man have some type of belief that may make the relationship last . But if you got some care free woman or man that don't have no belief in nothing except for the Government you may as accept the fact your relationship wont last until the Government says it will .