One Step Closer To A Civil War

6/9/2016 6:45:53 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	These jerk off liberals will never stop trying to take away our constitutional rights until we kick their asses right off the f*king planet.I'm for an all out civil war to put a stop to this bullshit once and for all.Restructure our constitution the way the framers set it up in the first place and anyone who goes against it without damn good cause gets exported to Iran or some other shithole in the middle east.As far as C-Carry goes it should be legal across the entire nation to conceal carry.The 2nd amendment is for everybody not just to a bunch or liberal dcklickers who's only goal is total control over the entire population. Semper Fi !!! Last Updated Jun 9, 2016 5:56 PM EDT SAN FRANCISCO -- Dealing a blow to gun supporters, a federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Americans do not have a constitutional right to carry concealed weapons in public. In a dispute that could ultimately wind up before the Supreme Court, a divided 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said local law enforcement officials can place significant restrictions on who is allowed to carry concealed guns. By a vote of 7-4, the court upheld a California law that says applicants must cite a "good cause" to obtain a concealed-carry permit. Typically, people who are being stalked or threatened, celebrities who fear for their safety, and those who routinely carry large amounts of cash or other valuables are granted permits. "We hold that the Second Amendment does not preserve or protect a right of a member of the general public to carry concealed firearms in public," Circuit Judge William A. Fletcher wrote for the majority. The ruling overturned a 2014 decision by a three-judge panel of the same court that said applicants need only express a desire for personal safety. In a dissent, Circuit Judge Consuelo M. Callahan said the ruling "obliterates the Second Amendment's right to bear a firearm in some manner in public for self-defense." Three other federal appeals courts have ruled similarly in the past, upholding California-like restrictions in New York, Maryland and New Jersey. In addition, another federal appeals court struck down Illinois' complete ban on carrying concealed weapons. The 9th Circuit covers nine Western states, but California and Hawaii are the only ones in which the ruling will have any practical effect. The others do not require permit applicants to cite a "good cause." Anyone in those states with a clean record and no history of mental illness can get a permit. The National Rifle Association called the ruling "out of touch." "This decision will leave good people defenseless, as it completely ignores the fact that law-abiding Californians who reside in counties with hostile sheriffs will now have no means to carry a firearm outside the home for personal protection," said NRA legislative chief Chris W. Cox. The New York-based gun control organization Everytown hailed the decision as "a major victory for public safety." The California case began in 2009, when Edward Peruta filed a legal challenge over the San Diego County sheriff's refusal to issue him a permit. Peruta said he wanted a weapon to protect himself, but the sheriff said he needed a better reason, such as that his occupation exposes him to robbery. Peruta, who is known as something of a legal gadfly, said he is neither a hunter, collector or target shooter but challenged the law because he believed it violated the Constitution. The NRA joined him in fighting the law. The San Diego Sheriff's Department said Thursday that since the 9th Circuit tossed out the law two years ago, it has received 2,463 applications from people seeking a concealed-weapon permit without having to show good cause. Sheriff's lawyer Robert Faigan said the department hasn't processed those applications and will continue to hold on to them while it waits to see what the Supreme Court does. Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
6/10/2016 4:01:33 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
sureshot40 Drumright, OK 48, joined Apr. 2011	"good cause" to have a concealed weapon, means nobody but them can have a concealed weapon and soon it could say you must have a "good cause" to have a weapon at all. That's why the NRA and I fight any restrictive gun legislation, give them a place to start and it will go farther. They will have to realize that people will have to be willing to die to take guns, because people are willing to die to keep guns.
6/10/2016 6:43:24 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	The second amendment was written so we could protect ourselves against people just like the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Semper Fi !!!
6/11/2016 7:24:32 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
6/11/2016 7:30:23 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	another day has come and gone and i have not used algebra
6/11/2016 8:51:23 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
purplerider1200 South Bend, IN 61, joined Aug. 2011	Go practice shooting instead. I highly doubt that shouting "I know algebra!"would stop a bullet.
6/12/2016 12:33:46 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
shawnee_b Edmonton, KY 62, joined Apr. 2010	Azzholes.
6/12/2016 8:06:22 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
hodag Grise Fiord, NU 64, joined Nov. 2007	Obama, Clinton, and all the other liberal jerk-off freedom haters will be rejuvenated now that a 22 year old singer was shot at point blank range Friday night, and now, Sunday morning, an ahole with ties to ISIS shot a bunch of queers in a homosexual bar. The liberals will be secretly jumping for joy knowing they can use this violence to further their agenda, the complete dis-armament of America. In Canada, the Canadian Government said "Turn in your guns", and the Canadians complied. In England, The British Government said "Turn in your guns", and the Brits complied. In Australia, the Aussie government said "Turn in your guns", and the Aussies complied. What the liberals don't understand is, when the U.S. Government says "Turn in your guns", our response will be "MOLON LABE!" "Come and take them!" or simply "FK YOU!" We are, after all, AMERICANS! And the rest of the world can thank us, the American Patriots, for whatever freedom they have left in their nations of sheep, because the American Patriots will never bend over for a bunch of tyrants. MOLON LABE Hodag
6/12/2016 8:31:10 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
hodag Grise Fiord, NU 64, joined Nov. 2007	Obama may think now is a real good time to push for more restrictive gun laws. Just a few hours ago, I was in Cabela's. Yes Sweetheart, the GUN department. Let me just say, they were incredibly busy. And I doubt like hell people were buying guns so they will have something to surrender when the Feds come knocking. Just sayin' MOLON LABE Hodag
6/12/2016 9:03:23 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
6/12/2016 9:31:51 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Everything you need to know about Florida ISIS terrorist Omar Mateen Terrorist Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat in Florida Mateen killed 50 people and injured 53 at a gay nightclub called 'Pulse' in Orlando, FL During the attack Mateen called 911 and pledged his allegiance to ISIS Mateen had both a license to carry a gun, criminal justice degree and worked as a security officer Orlando Shooter Worked For Security Company Which Transports Illegal Immigrants ISIS Announced Florida Threat THREE Days Ago: "We Will Attack Florida" Gays Must Die Says Speaker At Orlando Mosque - WFTV 9 Orlando Report Mateen's father supported the Taliban and tried to run for president of Afghanistan Have you ever seen a Muslim hospital? Have you ever heard a Muslim orchestra? Have you ever seen a Muslim band march in a parade? Have you ever witnessed a Muslim charity? Have you ever shaken hands with a Muslim Boy Scout? Have you ever seen a Muslim Candy Striper? The answer is no, you have not. Just ask yourself WHY??? Barack Obama, during his Cairo speech, said: "I know, too, that Islam has always been a part of America's history. HERE IS ONE AMERICAN CITIZEN'S RESPONSE TO THAT REMARK: Dear Mr. Obama: Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians. Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians. Can you show me one Muslim signature on the: United States Constitution? Declaration of Independence? Bill of Rights? Didn't think so. Did Muslims fight for this country's freedom from England? No. Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America? No they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half-brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as"pug nosed slaves." Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family's "rich Islamic heritage," doesn't it Mr. Obama? Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights. Where were Muslims during this country's Woman's Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the 'hajib' or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women's rights, aren't they? Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazi's in killing Jews. Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren't flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East. No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news network's that day. Strangely, the very "moderate" Muslims who's asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day. And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the "rich heritage" Muslims have here in America. Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslims. And now we can add November 5, 2009 - the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major who is a doctor and a psychiatrist who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan . Also, don't forget the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15.2013 was done by 2 Muslim Brothers. This, Mr. Obama is the "Muslim heritage" in America. Muslim Heritage, MY ASS!!!!
6/12/2016 9:42:39 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
hodag Grise Fiord, NU 64, joined Nov. 2007	According to barack hussien milhouse obama, it's peaceful, law-abiding American gun owners who threaten America.
6/13/2016 6:48:02 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
hodag Grise Fiord, NU 64, joined Nov. 2007	Quote from clarity101: ******HISTORY CLASS.....2066****** ......And those words, boys and girls, that arrogant and condescending remark by Elizabeth Warren, is what historians all agree finally sparked the Second American Revolution. Conservative, patriotic Americans had finally had enough of the corruption and tyranny foisted upon them by the Democrats, and they had finally had enough of the Republican Party. The Democrats had ignored the Constitution and had become tyrannical, and the Republicans promised to stand up to their tyranny and fight them, but did absolutely nothing. The tipping point had been reached. When the Democrats threatened to confiscate the firearms of the citizens, the citizens rose up. Led by Great American patriots Wayne LaPierre, Chris Cox, Ted Nugent, Allen West, David Clarke, and a few wild men known to history only as Shawnee, Tileman and Hodag, The Second American Revolution had begun. AMERICA WOULD NOT BE DISARMED! And boys and girls, that is why we enjoy the freedom we have today. That is why Planned Parenthood no longer exists. That is why today we can walk the streets of Chicago, Baltimore and Los Angeles at Three AM with pockets full of $100.00 bills in complete confidence and safety. That is why today, in 2066, businesses and individuals are no longer taxed and regulated to death. The Second American Revolution is why there are no longer any radical Islamic terrorist groups in the world today. When the Muslims saw the passion, bravery and ferocity of the American Patriots, they left the North American Continent and finally disbanded, realizing the world had had enough of their terrorism. It is because of the passion, bravery and courage of American Patriots that today, in 2066, the entire world is at peace. Finally Written by Hodag's Grandson.
6/13/2016 1:01:32 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	Right on Brother!!!! Semper Fi !!!
6/14/2016 8:24:51 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	This is something I've been thinking about for a while and I think it's time to set a few things straight about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The term "constitutional right" is antithetical to the founding principles of America. "Constitutional right" insinuates that a right is a dispensation from the government. We often hear people say, "The First Amendment gives me the right to say bla,bla,bla", or, "The Second Amendment gives me the right to have to own a gun". Really that's an ass-backwards way of looking at the Constitution. Imagine if there were no Constitution or Bill of Rights. Would you then be unable to speak? Of course not. What the Constitution does is prohibit the "government", specifically the "federal government", from infringing on your right to speak freely. Of Course, the political left, liberals, progressives, drive by media, does not want you to look at it in that perspective. The left wants the populace to believe that rights are dispensations from the government. If you look at the Bill of Rights, outside of some protections in the realm of jurisprudence, where a citizen may find himself contested against the government, you will see that, rather than granting rights, the Amendments actually are restrictions put on the federal government. The Second Amendment basically says to the government, "This area is out of your jurisdiction, F**K OFF!!" Semper Fi !!!
6/14/2016 9:19:29 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Quote from tileman1814: This is something I've been thinking about for a while and I think it's time to set a few things straight about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The term "constitutional right" is antithetical to the founding principles of America. "Constitutional right" insinuates that a right is a dispensation from the government. We often hear people say, "The First Amendment gives me the right to say bla,bla,bla", or, "The Second Amendment gives me the right to have to own a gun". Really that's an ass-backwards way of looking at the Constitution. Imagine if there were no Constitution or Bill of Rights. Would you then be unable to speak? Of course not. What the Constitution does is prohibit the "government", specifically the "federal government", from infringing on your right to speak freely. Of Course, the political left, liberals, progressives, drive by media, does not want you to look at it in that perspective. The left wants the populace to believe that rights are dispensations from the government. If you look at the Bill of Rights, outside of some protections in the realm of jurisprudence, where a citizen may find himself contested against the government, you will see that, rather than granting rights, the Amendments actually are restrictions put on the federal government. The Second Amendment basically says to the government, "This area is out of your jurisdiction, F**K OFF!!" Semper Fi !!!
6/14/2016 9:19:47 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
6/14/2016 11:04:49 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
hodag Grise Fiord, NU 64, joined Nov. 2007	Excellent post, Mike! I've been saying this for years. Read the Second Amendment. Read it slowly. Let every word sink in. Every word is there for a reason. A WELL REGULATED (law abiding-self disciplined) MILITIA (The citizens, who are willing and able to stand and fight) BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, ( Without the just mentioned law abiding citizens, freedom will not be secured. Freedom will cease to exist.) THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE ( signifying a pre-existing right, not granting a right.) TO KEEP (own) AND BEAR (Carry, on their person) ARMS (weapons) SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. (May not be taken, altered or diminished by the government.) Twenty seven words. Too complex for liberals to comprehend, and too affirmative for Communists to admit exists. We are obviously loosing our freedoms in America. I do not blame the Democrats. The Democrats are who they are. In Eastern Bloc countries, they are called Communists. Communists and Democrats are two titles that are interchangeable. I do not blame the Republicans. MOST Republicans are gutless, spineless cowards. They can not help themselves. I blame the citizens of America. We are way too timid. Too willing to turn the other cheek. The citizens of the United States should have picked up torches and pitch forks years ago and marched on Washington, DC. By doing nothing, we are in effect telling the politicians we are OK with them continuing to abuse us. I just now heard on Glenn Beck, and this is confirmed, RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS have a hit list containing the names of 8,000 Americans. The United States government has this list, but are not letting anyone know who is on this list. WAKE UP, PEOPLE!!!
6/14/2016 4:14:01 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
6/16/2016 8:31:29 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Milo Yiannopoulos Slams Twitter For Being ‘Sharia-Compliant,’ Credits Drudge With Reinstatement. Teodorczuk \| 5:02 pm, June 15, 2016 Milo Yiannopoulos has hit out at Twitter after they suspended his account earlier today, accusing the social networking service of being “Sharia-compliant” and in financial freefall. In a press conference at Ground Zero Orlando, delivering a truncated speech following Sunday’s mass shooting — one he was supposed to give on Muslims and gays at the University of Central Florida (UCF), which was canceled by campus police — Yiannopoulos said Muslim campaigners were responsible for him briefly thrown off Twitter this morning. Milo told a lively crowd that influential news aggregation site The Drudge Report linking to Heat Street’s article on him directly resulted in him being re-instated on Twitter. He said: “My Twitter account was suspended as a result of a campaign by Muslim tweeters. It has been re-instated because the Drudge Report put my picture on the front page with a gigantic headline- thank you Matt Drudge- saying ‘Twitter tells Milo to go to hell!’ “It was Muslims who told me to go to hell and I’m glad to see that Twitter very quickly panicked and backtracked and reinstated my Twitter account today. If it goes down again, who knows?,” he said. Referencing Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal, Milo said: “Twitter, whose largest investor is a Saudi, has become, to some degree, Sharia compliant in the last six-months. I think American universities are becoming Sharia-compliant too.” Milo added: “Conservatives haven’t demonstrated a particular aptitude for social networks. There are conservatives who run tech companies but they tend to come in later when the company really needs someone who understands numbers. You’re not going to change the politics of Silicon Valley. “I don’t have any realistic expectation that any social networking company or silicon valley start-up is going to discover a commitment to free speech or discover a commitment to fairness to conservative points of view. The best you can do is hold their feet to the fire when they fk up and when they fk up too much the stock price plummets and the company collapses which is what’s happening with Twitter right now.” Milo also slammed the decision of campus police to postpone his talk at UCF which was scheduled for Tuesday. He said: “What they couldn’t do is spare 6 or 8 officers to let a gay man say what the media won’t tell you, say what politicians won’t say, say what your celebrities are too f*king dumb to realize which is that this is not radical Islam, it is not terrorists forcing Obama to say radical Islam is only 25% of the war…the rest of the battle is being honest about about the challenges you face in this country.” Milo is having a press event in Orlando outside a church that’s collecting donations for victims. Shameful fame-whre. Completely unhelpful. Milo said the shooting in Orlando nightclub had made him support Donald Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigration: “After Orlando I’m all in favor.” Talking about safe spaces, he said: “Gun-free zones provide safe spaces for killers. The left likes to talk about safe spaces- well safe spaces for murderers are gun-free zones.” Milo contrasted the left’s attitude to Muslims versus socially conservative Christians: “Stop listening to the left. Stop listening to people who say peace, love and understanding and pacifism is going to save you. It didn’t save those people in the nightclub…there is no competition between declining to bake a cake and taking to a nightclub and killing or hurting 100 people. It is offensive and ridiculous and I don’t use the word ‘offensive’ very much but that is.” Milo added: “I’m here to give you a warning from Europe. I know what happens when governments and the media to pander to and to mollycoddle Islam. I know what happens to gay people, to trans people, to women and all the minorities the left claims that it is here to defend. “The politicians do not have your back, the media do not have your back, people are not going to protect gays or women or blacks or Latinos or any other minority. You’ve got to do it for yourself.” http://tiny.iavian.net/argk Milo at Orlando Shooting Site tiny.iavian.net VIDEO EXPOSES the truth behind the myth of 'moderate' Muslims http://heatst.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Milo-Yiannopoulos-UMass.jpg?w=1200&h=630&crop=1&quality=80&strip=info Published on Sep 5, 2014 Muslim conference in Sweden reveals the practice of Taqiyah (the islamic holy act of lying) to cover up the agenda of Islam.
6/23/2016 5:40:56 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
9/1/2016 9:52:52 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	After reading this article it becomes very apparent that this anti gun,anti 2nd amendment b*tch has an agenda that is far outside the realm of her job description as the Mass state AG.I would love to see every gun manufacturer in the country go after her.Force her to step down as AG. Semper Fi !!! Attorney General Maura Healey has launched a sweeping investigation into possible safety problems involving guns manufactured by at least two major companies, Remington and Glock, according to lawsuits filed by both firms, which are fighting Healey’s efforts. The lawsuits reveal that this year, Healey invoked her powers under the state’s consumer protection law to demand that both companies turn over a wide range of documents, including safety-related complaints from customers and the companies’ responses. The investigation is the second prominent battle Healey is waging against the gun industry. In July, she angered gun owners and manufacturers when she moved to bar the sale of military-style rifles that have been altered slightly to evade the state’s ban on assault weapons. In her newly disclosed legal action, Healey argues Glock firearms are “prone to accidental discharge” and makes clear in court papers that she is concerned the company may have been warned about the problem and failed to act. Responding to Glock’s lawsuit, she referenced news stories about a sheriff's deputy accidentally firing a Glock pistol in San Francisco’s Hall of Justice, a Los Angeles police officer who was paralyzed from the waist down after his 3-year-old son accidentally fired his Glock pistol, and a Massachusetts man who was dancing at a July 4th party when his Glock handgun fired while it was in his pocket. A Healey spokeswoman said the attorney general is asking gun manufacturers to turn over customer safety complaints because firearms are one of the only products not regulated by the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission. “As the chief law enforcement office in Massachusetts, we are seeking that information to better inform our residents and to protect them from any safety or manufacturing issues with guns sold here,” Cyndi Roy Gonzalez said. “It’s unfortunate that these gun manufacturers have taken our office to court rather than comply with a simple request for consumer complaints and related information.” Both Remington and Glock have sued Healey in Suffolk Superior Court, arguing that she is abusing her authority by casting a broad net for documents, including those related to accidental discharges, past lawsuits, legal settlements, and product recalls. Glock Inc.’s lawsuit asks the court to quash Healey’s inquiry. The company, based in Smyrna, Ga., points to statements Healey has made calling gun violence a “public health crisis” and an “epidemic” to argue the “true purpose” of her investigation is “to harass an industry that the attorney general finds distasteful and to make political headlines by pursuing members of the firearm industry.” Healey responds in court papers that Glock’s contention that she is politically motivated is “both incorrect and irrelevant,” given the concerns she has about the company’s handguns firing accidentally. She also says the state’s consumer protection law clearly gives her the authority to investigate safety concerns about products, including guns, that are available in Massachusetts. Glocks can be sold only to law enforcement officers in Massachusetts, because consumer sales are banned under state law. As such, Glock argues, Healey is misusing her investigative powers “for the ulterior purpose of harassing an out-of-state company that does not engage in in-state consumer sales.” But Healey says that, despite the state’s ban, 10,000 Glocks were sold in Massachusetts between January 2014 and August 2015, including 8,000 to buyers who do not appear to be law-enforcement officers. She said the handguns ended up in the hands of Massachusetts consumers “irrespective of whether the sales were made legally or not.” “The investigation is appropriate,” Healey’s office writes in its rebuttal to Glock, because Glock may have liability under the state’s consumer protection law for “product defects, misleading marketing, and for failure to honor warranties.” Remington Arms Co., based in Madison, N.C., contends Healey’s investigation is “unreasonable and excessively burdensome” because she is seeking product files from every state and country, even though fewer than 1 percent of the files relate to Massachusetts customers. Because Healey’s office “has provided virtually no information concerning the subject or object of its investigation, one cannot imagine what possible relevance product service files from Hawaii or Manitoba, Canada, could have on the AG’s investigation in Massachusetts,” Remington states in its lawsuit, filed Monday. Remington is asking the court to limit the scope of Healey’s investigation and allow it to remove customer information from the documents it turns over. If customer information is not removed, the company argues, its customers’ privacy rights would be violated, conduct protected by the Second Amendment would be chilled, and Remington’s business would be harmed. Healey has not yet responded in court to Remington’s accusations. Healey’s court papers, however, indicate that Remington and Glock are not the only gun makers she is targeting. Both are “part of a larger series of similar gun safety investigations,” Healey’s office wrote. Healey, a Democrat who took office last year, has made reducing gun violence a top issue — a crusade that has won her support from national gun-control advocates and the ire of gun owners and gun rights groups. In December, she warned the state’s 350 licensed gun dealers that they must obey the state’s strict gun laws and began investigating several dealers suspected of selling illegal firearms. In May, she led a dozen attorneys general in calling on Congress to allow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to study gun deaths as a public health issue. A day later, she spoke at a White House gun violence summit, where she decried the legal immunity Congress has granted to gun makers. “This is the only product of its kind for which Congress has given the industry extensive freedom from liability,” she said at the White House. “That’s not right. The gun industry should be held to the same liability standards as the manufacturers and sellers of other consumer products.” In July, she drew national attention when she moved to bar sales of so-called copycat assault rifles that had been modified slightly to evade the state’s 1998 assault weapons ban. Gun enthusiasts snapped up the rifles in a buying frenzy, and then protested outside the State House. The National Shooting Sports Foundation, meanwhile, said it would challenge Healey’s ban in court, arguing it hurt gun dealers and “made potential felons out of tens of thousands of law-abiding citizens.” [Edited 9/1/2016 9:54:15 AM ]
9/1/2016 5:39:26 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
DLAL60 Hampton, GA 52, joined Oct. 2014	I have found my people on here FINALLY! My daughter met Milo in Ca and got to ask him a question. She has since become friends with some of his staffers and she and a few friends from around this great country have started a new online right but balanced info service https://refinedright.com/ Please check it out....I have never thought to look for this group on DH...but I am glad I did! Georgia chat is dead Hello
9/1/2016 9:33:01 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
driver406 Saint Paul, MN 65, joined Oct. 2009	I think the military should take over if Killary wins.
9/2/2016 9:43:05 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	Quote from driver406: I think the military should take over if Killary wins. I doubt they will have to!We are so close to a full blown revolution right now it's scary.If that skank hellary wins, it's either go down fighting for our country or become slaves to the liberal government. Semper Fi !!!
9/2/2016 11:17:21 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
stargazzer Creighton, NE 68, joined Feb. 2007	Quote from tileman1814: I doubt they will have to!We are so close to a full blown revolution right now it's scary.If that skank hellary wins, it's either go down fighting for our country or become slaves to the liberal government. Semper Fi !!! Yes, as if Crooked Hi-LIAR-y wins what started 240 years ago is over and you will never ever be able to vote your once Republic back No not ever. We the people will need to fight again for liberty or surrender to evil.
9/2/2016 7:26:52 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
shawnee_b Edmonton, KY 62, joined Apr. 2010	Quote from DLAL60: I have found my people on here FINALLY! My daughter met Milo in Ca and got to ask him a question. She has since become friends with some of his staffers and she and a few friends from around this great country have started a new online right but balanced info service https://refinedright.com/ Please check it out....I have never thought to look for this group on DH...but I am glad I did! Georgia chat is dead Hello Welcome, enjoy. Good people here, real Americans.
9/2/2016 7:39:08 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	I don't know very much about the Swiss but if they are anything like the gun owners here in the US they will tell the EU to FO!! Semper Fi !!! Swiss fear EU effort to tighten gun control could disarm law-abiding citizens Swiss gun rights proponents fear a new European Union measure to tighten gun control could disarm thousands of law-abiding citizens, Reuters reports. The proposed gun restrictions which Switzerland, a non-EU member, would be obliged to implement under cross border agreements, has raised hackles among the Swiss, who resent intervention from Brussels, the news wire reported. It also comes at a time of increased tensions between Switzerland and the EU over Swiss efforts to curb immigration. Christopher Blocher, a leading voice of the Swiss right, told Reuters Switzerland should end its participation in the system of passport-free travel if the tighter gun restrictions are defeated in a referendum. The proposed measure would curb online weapons sales and impose more restrictions on assault weapons, the according to Reuters. It was drafted after the ISIS terrorist attacks in Paris last November that killed scores of people. The initial proposal provoked an outcry in Switzerland because it meant a ban on the long Swiss tradition of ex-soldiers keeping their assault rifles, the new wire reported. Then two months ago, Justice Minister Simonetta Sommagrua returned from meetings in Brussels saying she he successfully negotiated against such a ban, according to Reuters. But in the fine print, the EU demanded concessions including psychological tests and club membership. Swiss gun rights proponents also fear the restrictions could encroach on the country’s proud heritage and national identity that includes a well-armed citizenry. “When conflicts arise, Switzerland must put its sovereignty first,” said Blocher, a businessman and vice president of the SVP, the country's biggest party, told Reuters. “In an emergency, Switzerland should be ready to exit (the cross border agreements).” Switzerland has one of the highest rates of private gun ownership in Europe, with nearly 48 percent of households owning a gun. In France, there are about 30 weapons per 100 people, while the figure in the Great Britain is far lower, at 6.7 guns per 100 civilians, Reuters reported citing the Australian-based think tank GunPolicy.org. However, gun-related crime in Switzerland is low and the high number of privately owned guns harks back to a long tradition of self-defense and to the Swiss policy of near-universal conscription, Reuters reported. In 2015, 11 percent of the 20,600 soldiers who left the Swiss Army opted to keep their assault rifles which upon departure are modified to fire single shots, according to Reuters. The number of soldiers choosing to keep their weapons has been declining for several years. Switzerland's grassroots gun lobby ProTELL, named after the 14th-century folk hero William Tell, is prepared to call for a referendum on the EU bloc’s proposal, if necessary. “With our direct democracy, Swiss people are accustomed to having the last word,” ProTell's Dominik Riner told Reuters. “We're opposed to any and all efforts to make current weapons laws more restrictive.” Europe plans to finalize its gun directive later this year, Reuters reported.
9/4/2016 4:50:57 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
tileman1814 Kalispell, MT 66, joined Nov. 2007	Well,here is another backdoor attempt at gun control under the guise of research.More taxpayer funded lies.They talk about small grants being divided up between different groups for their research "BRIBES".All they need to do is look at the people doing the shooting.You got the general psyco,usually someone strungout on some kind of drugs then you got the muzzies (thanks to obama) but in the whole lot you can bet that over 90% of them are very close to either the democraps or left leaning liberals.History tell it all.Last but not least look at who is behind this bs,janet (scuzbucket) napolitano. Semper Fi !!! University of California president, Janet Napolitano, announced that the nation’s first center dedicated to studying gun violence as a health issue, the University of California Firearm Violence Research Center, will launch on the UC Davis campus in Sacramento. According to California Health Report, state lawmakers designated $5 million to launch the center. Napolitano said: The state’s decision to provide public funding for a center to study firearm violence — the first of its kind in the nation — demonstrates great leadership by the state and presents a unique opportunity for the University of California to be at the forefront of researching a growing public health issue. SPECIAL: We’re putting boots on the ground in battleground states RIGHT NOW to STOP Hillary’s rampant election fraud, and we need your support! It is now or never! While researchers at the Sacramento campus will be the driving force behind looking at guns through the prism of public health, Napolitano “expects scientists at the other UC campuses to contribute to the research,” as well. “The center will train post-doctoral researchers, such as epidemiologists or physicians, who want to study violence. And it will issue small grants to scientists across the country who are conducting firearm-violence prevention research.” The center will be guided by “an advisory board,” which consists of elected officials, law enforcement personnel, and academics. [Edited 9/4/2016 4:51:51 PM ]
11/6/2016 8:21:04 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
flatheadone Greenwood, FL 53, joined Jul. 2012	Although I hate to think about being in a civil war at my age. I much rather go down fighting for freedom and not given in to the alternative.
11/7/2016 9:38:08 AM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	hitlery did outspend donald by multi millions and the big difference is that most of what donald spent was his own money. the only way there will be protests and violence is if trump wins.... the crazy lieinglooneyleftyliberalprogressivedimdumdems (who proclaim TOLERANCE btw) will come out in gangs and terrorize every part of this nation for months maybe years Top ten reasons to vote for Donald Trump. 1. Hillary is corrupt. 2. Swamp needs draining. 3. The people around Hillary are corrupt. 4. FBI fighting DOJ is disaster for America and continues under President Hillary Clinton. 5. Clinton Foundation is corrupt. Read or view Clinton Cash, WikiLeaks, Judicial Watch and Project Veritas. 6. Donald Trump is G-d’s gift to talk radio and will be held accountable by us, Congress and Courts. 7. Democrats and mainstream media co-opted and corrupted by Clintons and money and insider dealings. 8. Trump favors capitalism over communism. 9. Tim Kaine and bad guy George Soros back Crooked Hillary and the boycott of Netanyahu's speech to Congress. 10. I like Gov. Mike Pence; lawyer and radio talk show host. Craig Silverman: "Which side says The Islamic State is not Islamic?" hitlery is known for referring to young black men as SUPER PREDATORS, she's also on record for calling Latino's "needy", millennials as basement dwellers, Repubs as deplorable and irredeemable, picked on Bernie for being Jewish. She has no love for Americans.
11/7/2016 1:18:45 PM	One Step Closer To A Civil War
flatheadone Greenwood, FL 53, joined Jul. 2012	People get ready it is not looking good lot of talk going around

mega personal account login

pure hookup app review