Mixing Religion and Politics

5/8/2017 6:47:12 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
muldoon1959 Vallejo, CA 58, joined Feb. 2008 online now!	What ever. Cling to your fantasies. I'll stick with reality. Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
5/8/2017 6:52:50 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Science made the claim there are 2 planets further from the sun than that are larger than earth. If theoretically larger objects are closest to the biggest object creating the biggest source of gravity within a galaxy. How can "earth" be where only the sun could create the environment for evolution (3rd rock from sol) and be defying gravitational pull keeping 2 larger planets from moving earth to (5th rock from the sol)? Is this a fluke (since you do not believe in miracles)? [Edited 5/8/2017 6:53:41 PM ]
5/8/2017 6:55:23 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
progrocknic Mount Arlington, NJ 33, joined Dec. 2012	Where do you get this 1.5% from? Do you have a link to an article?
5/8/2017 7:30:24 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	http://christiannews.net/2013/06/17/groundbreaking-genetic-discoveries-challenge-ape-to-human-evolutionary-theory/ Groundbreaking Genetic Discoveries Challenge Ape to Human Evolutionary Theory
5/8/2017 7:38:21 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
muldoon1959 Vallejo, CA 58, joined Feb. 2008 online now!
5/8/2017 10:04:12 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
ultrabrat007 Crescent City, CA 41, joined Dec. 2016	Quote from muldoon1959: Are you actually benefiting from yours or is it just a "feel good" thing? Has Jesus actually cured anyone by getting enough Facebook likes? Quote from ultrabrat007: And, here you have missed the main point...again! Did those people benefit from their beliefs or not? If you are following duchessa's position that these types of beliefs are all bull...then you must confront my question.. Sorry, muldoon..1. My beliefs are irrelevant. 2. Lets get back to the point, you know, the conversation you chimed in on, and the question still remains.. If people benefit from a belief..how can it be considered bull#&!t? Ahha..I see...its considered bullsh#&t to you..which like I said is your opinion..nothing more.. Are we all cleared up here?
5/9/2017 7:46:05 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from iam_resurrected: http://christiannews.net/2013/06/17/groundbreaking-genetic-discoveries-challenge-ape-to-human-evolutionary-theory/ Groundbreaking Genetic Discoveries Challenge Ape to Human Evolutionary Theory Fresh findings in the field of genetics have directly challenged yet another key evolutionary hypothesis by showing that the differences between humans and apes cannot be easily accounted for under the theory of evolution. A recent 12-page journal article, written by three scientists in Spain and published in Molecular Biology and Evolution, details the results of careful analysis of human and chimpanzee DNA. After comparing and contrasting thousands of orthologous genes from humans and chimps, the scientists found their final data to be very much at odds with evolutionary theory. In fact, they even titled their article “Recombination Rates and Genomic Shuffling in Human and Chimpanzee—A New Twist in the Chromosomal Speciation Theory.” Why are these findings seen as a “new twist” to the evolutionary theory? In short, because many scientists have claimed that genetic differences between humans and apes can be attributed to a process known as “genetic recombination,” which is a phenomenon that generates slight genetic variation via meiosis. However, this new journal article seriously calls this proposition into question. In their research, the three Spanish scientists scrutinized differences between human and chimp genes, expecting to find higher genetic recombination rates in these areas of dissimilarity. Even though studies of human-chimp similarities have been conducted in years past, this particular research was unprecedented because the scientists took advantage of new, high-resolution genome maps. Ultimately, the study results were contradictory to what evolutionists had theorized. Not only were genetic recombination rates markedly low in areas of human-chimp DNA differences (“rearranged” chromosomes), but the rates were much higher in areas of genetic similarity (“collinear” chromosomes). This is the reverse of what evolutionists had predicted. “The analysis of the most recent human and chimpanzee recombination maps inferred from genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism data,” the scientists explained, “revealed that the standardized recombination rate was significantly lower in rearranged than in collinear chromosomes.” Jeffrey Tomkins, a Ph.D. geneticist with the Institute for Creation Research (ICR), told the Christian News Network that these results were “totally backwards” from what evolutionists had predicted, since genetic recombination is “not occurring where it’s supposed to” under current evolutionary theory. Dr. Tomkins further emphasized that evolutionists greatly exaggerate the genetic similarities between humans and chimps, and often ignore areas of DNA where major differences do exist. “It’s called cherry-picking the data,” he explained. “There are many genetic regions between humans and chimps that are radically different. In fact, humans have many sections of DNA that are missing in chimps and vice versa. Recent research is now showing that the genomes are only 70% similar overall.” This is not the first time scientists have questioned evolutionists’ assertions regarding humans’ and chimps’ similarities. David DeWitt, a biochemist and Ph.D. neuroscientist, reiterated in an article for Answers in Genesis that evolutionary scientists commonly underestimate the genetic dissimilarities between humans and apes by significant margins. And even relatively small percentage differences equate to formidable genetic discrepancies “If 5% of the DNA [between humans and apes] is different,” Dr. DeWitt points out, “this amounts to 150,000,000 DNA base pairs that are different between them!” Ultimately, Dr. Tomkins concluded, genetic evidence is once again stacking up against evolutionary scientists, forcing them to revise their theories. “Evolutionists are having a lot of problems dealing with current studies in DNA research,” he stated. “Their predictions based on their naturalistic presuppositions are consistently being overturned by scientific discovery. Because they cannot accept the idea of a Creator, they simply change their theory to adapt. The only thing that appears to be evolving is ‘evolution,’ and it’s becoming more and more absurd.”
5/9/2017 8:15:30 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	I really love how this DR. puts it into clear perspective about the attempts by science concerning "evolution." He flat out states: “It’s called cherry-picking the data,” he explained. This educated Doctor/Scientist who specializes in this specific area as an "expert" is telling us that SCIENCE LIES (when they do not have FACT!!) Imagine that!! Science LIES, who would had ever guessed? Claiming there are 4 scientific theories that are full of bullsh*t would be one way to go about calling "science" liars [Edited 5/9/2017 8:16:30 AM ]
5/9/2017 8:53:37 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from muldoon1959: Adams did in the "treaty of Tripoli!!"
5/10/2017 1:02:31 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
louie6332 Falkville, AL 75, joined Nov. 2011	Iam, you are a hypocrite, you laud science and the scientific method, but categorically refuse to use a scientific method to test your religion of Pentecostalism to see whether it be of God or not, and to test Catholicism to see whether it be of God or not. Are you afraid of what you might find out? And don’t come back and say: “I don’t have to test it, I already know Pentecostalism is of God, and Catholicism is of Satan. And I don’t have to test the Catholic prophets to see if they be of God, I assume they are of Satan, and my assumption is good enough for me. My father told me so, and he would never lie to me." So much for the scientific method. Right Iam? But Saint Paul tells us: “Test the spirits to see if they be of God, for not every spirit is of God”. You have to test the spirits, I am, especially today, for today we are in the Period of Trial of the Apocalypse and Satan and his demons roam the world like furies seeing to deceive even the elect if that were possible. Iam, you have to test your beliefs, if you are acting in good faith, you cannot just categorically accept the lies you have been told by the enemies of the Catholic Church without testing them as you are doing. And you cannot just bastardize history to support your lies, anymore than you can bastardize science to support your lies. Test all things. You say, Catholics are Pagans. Iam, as I have pointed out, Paganism, fundamentally and by definition, is the worship of creatures rather than the Creator. Are you saying that God the Father, the Creator, the First Person of the Blessed Trinity and his Only Begotten Son Jesus Christ, in whom is incarnate the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, and whom Catholics worship, are creatures? And how can you claim to be following Jesus Christ when you are detesting his Apostles? He said to his Apostles: “Go teach all nations what I have taught you, those who hear you, hear me, and those who despise you, despise me.” And yet, you despise them with a purple passion and damn them all to Hell while claiming to be following Christ. Go figure. Louie
5/10/2017 2:57:37 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
muldoon1959 Vallejo, CA 58, joined Feb. 2008 online now!	I'm pretty much ignoring you at this point because: A> Your complete stupidity on how a light year is a matter of opinion. B> You went full retard on gravity and gas giants. Quote from iam_resurrected: I really love how this DR. puts it into clear perspective about the attempts by science concerning "evolution." He flat out states: “It’s called cherry-picking the data,” he explained. This educated Doctor/Scientist who specializes in this specific area as an "expert" is telling us that SCIENCE LIES (when they do not have FACT!!) Imagine that!! Science LIES, who would had ever guessed? Claiming there are 4 scientific theories that are full of bullsh*t would be one way to go about calling "science" liars
5/10/2017 3:17:47 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
mr_bad_robot Cincinnati, OH 42, joined Jul. 2014	Science is only as accurate as the scientist abilities to gather factorial data. The earth was the center of the solar system until it wasn't. The earth was flat until it wasn't. Every scientific breakthrough first started with a break with.
5/11/2017 5:33:45 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Muldoon: A> Your complete stupidity on how a light year is a matter of opinion. B> You went full retard on gravity and gas giants. a lightyear is the distance not time as some in your belief feel they are time traveling and not calculating distances by using lightyear Gravity is measured on mass not size. But earths mass is 5th in comparison to the other planets and its gravity values are 3rd among planets but has the highest density. Gravity is one of the four forces of nature, along with electromagnetism, strong force and weak force. Einstein proposed that the universe began as a singularity, a point with zero volume and infinite density containing all the matter of the universe. Then the big bang occurred, rapidly expanding all that matter with enough ferocity to overpower the inward pull of gravity. Einstein also predicted that we'd be able to tell gravity was present during those early moments, thanks to gravitational waves (or changes in a gravitational field). All the resulting gas and dust eventually formed into the universe we know today due to gravity as well. The formation of the Solar System began 4.6 billion years ago with the gravitational collapse of a small part of a giant molecular cloud.[1] Most of the collapsing mass collected in the center, forming the Sun, while the rest flattened into a protoplanetary disk out of which the planets, moons, asteroids, and other small Solar System bodies formed. Notice: all about gravity being a force or collapsing as I suggested....gravity!! Now it is rather obvious how little about math you truthfully understand [Edited 5/11/2017 5:35:11 AM ]
5/11/2017 9:36:11 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from louie6332: Iam, you are a hypocrite, you laud science and the scientific method, but categorically refuse to use a scientific method to test your religion of Pentecostalism to see whether it be of God or not, and to test Catholicism to see whether it be of God or not. Are you afraid of what you might find out? And don’t come back and say: “I don’t have to test it, I already know Pentecostalism is of God, and Catholicism is of Satan. And I don’t have to test the Catholic prophets to see if they be of God, I assume they are of Satan, and my assumption is good enough for me. My father told me so, and he would never lie to me." So much for the scientific method. Right Iam? But Saint Paul tells us: “Test the spirits to see if they be of God, for not every spirit is of God”. You have to test the spirits, I am, especially today, for today we are in the Period of Trial of the Apocalypse and Satan and his demons roam the world like furies seeing to deceive even the elect if that were possible. Iam, you have to test your beliefs, if you are acting in good faith, you cannot just categorically accept the lies you have been told by the enemies of the Catholic Church without testing them as you are doing. And you cannot just bastardize history to support your lies, anymore than you can bastardize science to support your lies. Test all things. You say, Catholics are Pagans. Iam, as I have pointed out, Paganism, fundamentally and by definition, is the worship of creatures rather than the Creator. Are you saying that God the Father, the Creator, the First Person of the Blessed Trinity and his Only Begotten Son Jesus Christ, in whom is incarnate the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, and whom Catholics worship, are creatures? And how can you claim to be following Jesus Christ when you are detesting his Apostles? He said to his Apostles: “Go teach all nations what I have taught you, those who hear you, hear me, and those who despise you, despise me.” And yet, you despise them with a purple passion and damn them all to Hell while claiming to be following Christ. Go figure. Louie Considering that we can verify when documents were written, based upon how the parchment paper were designed or made. Indicates specifically when scriptures were "originally written." And according to the river reed method (plant split into 2 halves and overlapped until it made length of a scroll parchment paper, glued, and pressed with weight), we can identify the earliest (4 Gospels) around 45 AD which do not include the "virgin birth myth." That manifesto came roughly 340 years later who "created lies" to which the pagan cathlick church follow [Edited 5/11/2017 9:37:08 AM ]
5/11/2017 1:13:16 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
louie6332 Falkville, AL 75, joined Nov. 2011	Iam, is that what your heretic and apostate father and grandfather, who believe the Bible to have been bastardized, and the Church that Christ established to be Pagan, told you? And if they told you so, then it has to be true. Right? And apparently you think Saint Paul didn’t know what he was talking about when he said that not every spirit is of God, and that you have to test the spirits to see if they be of God. No, absolutely not, you will not test the spirits because you are terrified what you might find. When it comes to discerning what is of God and what is not, scientific methods does NOT apply. Right Iam? Iam, the Catholic Church, the Church established by Jesus Christ, like the Church of the Old Covenant, is illustrated by continuing divine revelation and prophecy and continuing divine miracles. Saint Paul tells us so in his epistles. God sends his prophets to his Gentile Church, and has from the beginning to this very day. And Jesus and Mary have appeared many times to the Church, especially in these last centuries. And Mary HERSELF has revealed in these apparitions that she was ever virgin. And if she does not know, who does? Did that just fly right over your head, or just go into one ear and right out the other, just like the laws of gravity did? Gravitational force is a function, not only of mass, but of distance, and you have to take BOTH into account, there is no rationale behind expecting the heaviest planets to be the closest to the Sun, and no law of physics demands that. Nor is there any rationale for expecting the Church established by Jesus Christ to have magically appeared 20 centuries after Christ. Iam, let me explain it to you like this: in those days, the days of Christ, when a ruler of a city left the city, he would hand the keys to the city to his Prime Minister, leaving him in charge during his absence. When our Lord handed the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven to Peter, he was leaving Peter, his lead Apostle, in charge of his Church during his long absence, for he, himself, would soon be ascending into Heaven and leaving him in charge. The Apostle Peter and his successors are the Prime Ministers of Christ. After Christ returns, he will personally assume the reign over his Church. When Christ returns, he will rescue the Jews in Israel, who will have converted in mass to Christianity (which will be the cue for Christ to return), wage war against his enemies, who will be amassed against Israel at Armageddon, and establish his reign upon the Earth as King of the kings of the Earth from the throne of David in the Jewish city of Jerusalem on Mount Zion in the Jewish nation of Israel, which will become the capital nation of the whole world. At that time he himself will reign over his flock, and there will be no more Prime Ministers of Christ, no more popes. The Bishops of Rome are the Prime Ministers of Christ only during his absence. We are today in what is referred to as the “Church Age”. You see, there was a prophecy from the Jewish Tradition that was well known among the Jews in Christ’s time. It foretold that 50 years, from the time of his ascension into Heaven till his return, would be allotted to the Church of the Messiah to evangelize the world before his return. This is referred to as “the Church Age”. Jesus Christ and his apostles knew this prophecy and believe it, which is why they were telling people in their hearing that he would return soon, even within the lifetime of some of those in his hearing. But it is now clear that the time was hidden in the prophecy. The 50 years is fifty Jubilee Years, and since a Jubilee occurs once every 50 years, this is 2000 years. Christ will return soon after the 2000 years allotted to the Church to evangelize the nations, counting form the date of the ascension of Christ, is up. I have pinpointed the dates of Christ from astronomical methods, and he ascended in the spring of 27AD. So he will be due to return shortly after the Church Age ends in 2027AD. The Church established by Jesus Christ, was described from the very beginning as “Catholic” by none other than the Holy Spirit. You see, when the Apostles were in the Supper Room preparing for the arrival of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost (Jesus,when he was about to ascend, had told them to go there and await his coming), the Holy Spirit gave them a prayer: each Apostle sitting around the table, under the influence of the Holy Spirit, said a sentence of a prayer, and it went around the table that way until the whole prayer was said. This is what is referred to today as “The Apostle’s Creed Prayer”. And in this prayer, the Church established by Jesus Christ who by that time had ascended into the heavens from the Mount of Olives and left, leaving his Apostle Peter in charge, is referred to as “Catholic” and “Apostolic”. Pentecost is considered by the Church today to be the birthday of the Church. So from the very beginning, the Church of Jesus Christ was being referred to as “Catholic”, by none other than the Holy Spirit, the Third Person of the Blessed Trinity. The word “Catholic”, as applied to the Catholic Church, has as many as five meanings today. But the original meaning of the word, which arose in the first century, was attributed to St. Ignatius (d 107), the third bishop of Antioch, who in reply to those who believed only part of what Christ taught, answered the question as to what he believed [already heresies were beginning to pop up here and there] by using the Greek word “katholikos”, meaning “all”: “I believe KATHOLIKOS, I believe ALL that Christ taught!”. And this was the original meaning of the word “Catholic” as applied to the Church. The Catholic Church is the Church that teaches ALL that Christ taught, and Catholics are those who believe ALL that Christ taught. Protestants do not, they pick and choose what they will believe [Reference: The Dogma of Hell by Schouppe, pg 145]. Louie
5/12/2017 8:52:54 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Yahshua set us His church in 33 AD to which James was the leader (instructions from Christ)(not Peter) as the "lying pagan Cathlicks" make claim to: (12) The disciples said to Jesus, "We know that you will depart from us. Who is to be our leader?" Jesus said to them, "Wherever you are, you are to go to James the righteous, for whose sake heaven and earth came into being." So you Cathlicks making Peter pope and leader... is direct "DISOBEDIENCE" unto YAHshua!! Christ did not give any of "His disciples" leadership role but unto James!! I will take my chances by NOT OBEYING THE PAGAN CATHLICKS since I know and can CONFIRM the PAGAN CATHLICKS ARE LIARS!!
5/12/2017 12:22:33 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
muldoon1959 Vallejo, CA 58, joined Feb. 2008 online now!	Quote from iam_resurrected: a lightyear is the distance not time as some in your belief feel they are time traveling and not calculating distances by using lightyear Gravity is measured on mass not size. :: You know the words but you obviously don't comprehend their meaning.
5/12/2017 12:54:50 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
louie6332 Falkville, AL 75, joined Nov. 2011	Iam, I can’t find that in the Bible, you will need to provide a link to the reference. I say again, you are not willing to “test the spirit to see if they be of God”, so you are not acting in good faith. You love your beliefs more than you love truth. You laud science but are unwilling to use a scientific method when it comes to your beliefs. Our Lord has said: “Humility is the beginning of all conversions”. And that is true, ceasing to be your own god and submitting yourself to God requires humanity. God is a God of Truth. So if you are on the road to truth, you are on the road to God. Those who make truth their master and follow it wherever it leads are on the road to God. You have to test the truth to see if it is true and if it be of God. Those who cling to false beliefs are living in a fairy tale world. Iam, since you claim to like science, I leave you with a riddle concerning physics: what is mass-- fundamentally, what is it? I will leave it for you to ponder over. Louie
5/13/2017 8:17:29 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	it is found in scripture to which the bastard pagan Cathlicks left out so they could create the lie you foolishly believe in!! But even when Paul would return from his journeys he writes where he had to check in with JAMES (the LEADER). So Peter, never was the LEADER as Christ commanded James to be. Why would Peter disobey Yahshua? if he did, he would be just like you Cathlicks!!
5/13/2017 8:20:14 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from muldoon1959: You know the words but you obviously don't comprehend their meaning. I used them properly and also pointed out how some idiots find lightyear to be time travel not distance. And I used gravity properly according to Einstein. Are you stupid to not even recognize the work of those you idiotically worship?
5/13/2017 11:19:01 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
muldoon1959 Vallejo, CA 58, joined Feb. 2008 online now!	Quote from iam_resurrected: I used them properly and also pointed out how some idiots find lightyear to be time travel not distance. And I used gravity properly according to Einstein. Are you stupid to not even recognize the work of those you idiotically worship? You have the comprehension skills of a gerbil. Like I said, you know the words but have no concept of their meaning. Too fking stupid to figure out what a light year actually means. It's both you moron. A light year is the distance it takes for light to travel 1 year. Light travels at ~186,000 miles per second. The moon is about 250,000 miles from earth, or roughly 2 light seconds. The sun is roughly 96,000,000 miles from earth or roughly 8 light minutes. We use light year to measure interstellar distances because if we used miles, the numbers would become incomprehensibly large even using exponents. As far as mas and gravity, you're apparently too fking stupid to connect the dots about how rocks are more dense than gasses. Which is why our "gas" giants are in the orbits they're in. But naturally, you dumb enough to believe that "god" put them there instead of recognizing that gasses being the least dense of material would have been further way from the sun as a cloud ring around the sun before coalescing into planets after a period of time.
5/13/2017 3:57:55 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from muldoon1959: You have the comprehension skills of a gerbil. Like I said, you know the words but have no concept of their meaning. Too fking stupid to figure out what a light year actually means. It's both you moron. A light year is the distance it takes for light to travel 1 year. Light travels at ~186,000 miles per second. The moon is about 250,000 miles from earth, or roughly 2 light seconds. The sun is roughly 96,000,000 miles from earth or roughly 8 light minutes. We use light year to measure interstellar distances because if we used miles, the numbers would become incomprehensibly large even using exponents. I do recall stating light year was a term for distance, not time travel as other followers of science have indicated. As far as mas and gravity, you're apparently too fking stupid to connect the dots about how rocks are more dense than gasses. Which is why our "gas" giants are in the orbits they're in. But naturally, you dumb enough to believe that "god" put them there instead of recognizing that gasses being the least dense of material would have been further way from the sun as a cloud ring around the sun before coalescing into planets after a period of time. and why planets (rocks) are closer to Sol than stars (gases((my term nuclear reactors)). I believe from the Book of Job , which speaks of dinosaurs (herbivores), God using mathematics and ruler/tape measure, and (YAH's) capability of creating life from underneath the water is a world of people before Adam. The bible is specific of such people. And within the Book of Job there is no mention or relation to Adam or to the " Promise/Messiah." So, I believe Job represents Genesis 1:1 (finished earth with life on it). I believe in Genesis 1:2 we now have a lifeless (vacant) earth under water (so everyone is dead including dinosaurs)(ice age). And even with the creation of Adam, the bible is clear of people on the earth since Adam's son Cain married a woman from another land and more people. With all that I believe from what have I provided from the bible, I have no real argument that the people before Adam could had been part of evolution. And I believe Adam is a specific creation because he leads to Yahshua dying on the cross!! [Edited 5/13/2017 3:59:18 PM ]
5/13/2017 4:31:10 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
muldoon1959 Vallejo, CA 58, joined Feb. 2008 online now!
5/13/2017 4:32:56 PM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
kraven_morehed Greenwood, LA 95, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from muldoon1959:
5/14/2017 7:03:40 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from muldoon1959: And that bible quote is a lot more than a Big Bang Theory WITHOUT physics to prove it, no biochemistry to separate humans at birth based upon pre conditions such as being queer or straight (more lies), or you have "hard limit standards" for dating variable conditions in uranium and carbon dating (), and inherited genetics works perfectly with natural selection, not evolution!! You must be a moron to act like you know the TRUTH when 4 theories of yours CANNOT be proven as FACT!! talk about stupid LOOK at the FOOLS following the 4 lies of science and pretending to have a CLUE!! You do have a clue btw...to why you don't have any answers because THEY DO NOT EXIST [Edited 5/14/2017 7:05:06 AM ]
5/14/2017 9:03:28 AM	Mixing Religion and Politics \| Page 7
iam_resurrected Reno, NV 46, joined Jul. 2014	Quote from muldoon1959: As far as mas and gravity, you're apparently too f**king stupid to connect the dots about how rocks are more dense than gasses. Which is why our "gas" giants are in the orbits they're in. But naturally, you dumb enough to believe that "god" put them there instead of recognizing that gasses being the least dense of material would have been further way from the sun as a cloud ring around the sun before coalescing into planets after a period of time. I said, earth was 3rd rock before you responded to me... ...and I said, planets bigger than earth were further away. So you adding the difference between planets (rocks) and stars (gasses) is asinine when it was not what I pointed out. Planets in our system are classified as rock. It is here where size is defying logic in gravity.

mega classifieds

datehookup website

mega classifieds

datehookup website

Mixing Religion and Politics

Mixing Religion and Politics | Page 7