4/23/2017 1:12:58 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
It's a combination of the earths wobble, and sun spots, prove me wrong, I dare ya.
Climate Myth:
It's the sun
"Over the past few hundred years, there has been a steady increase in the numbers of sunspots, at the time when the Earth has been getting warmer. The data suggests solar activity is influencing the global climate causing the world to get warmer."
Climate Fact:
Over the last 35 years the sun has shown a cooling trend. However global temperatures continue to increase. If the sun's energy is decreasing while the Earth is warming, then the sun can't be the main control of the temperature.
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
4/23/2017 1:13:08 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
But why is the earth cooling
If our increased carbon footprint is causing warming?
The earth isn't cooling.
|
4/23/2017 1:18:17 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
But why is the earth cooling
If our increased carbon footprint is causing warming?
Climate myth:
It's cooling
"In fact global warming has stopped and a cooling is beginning. No climate model has predicted a cooling of the Earth – quite the contrary. And this means that the projections of future climate are unreliable.
Climate fact:
When looking for evidence of global warming, there are many different indicators that we should look for. Whilst it's natural to start with air temperatures, a more thorough examination should be as inclusive as possible; snow cover, ice melt, air temperatures over land and sea, even the sea temperatures themselves. The key indicators of global warming shown below are all moving in the direction expected of a warming globe.
Indicators of a warming world based on surface, satellite, and ocean temperature measurements, satellite measurements of energy imbalance (the difference between incoming and outgoing energy at the top of the atmosphere), and of receding glaciers, sea ice, and ice sheets, rising sea level, and shifting seasons.
The question of global warming stopping is often raised in the light of a recent weather event - a big snowfall or drought breaking rain. Global warming is entirely compatible with these events; after all they are just weather. For climate change, it is the long term trends that are important; measured over decades or more, and those long term trends show that the globe is still, unfortunately, warming.
|
4/23/2017 1:24:44 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
jitssbaby617
Roslindale, MA
38, joined Jun. 2014
online now!
|
When I was a kid I grew up watching men land on the moon
and figured by 2017 we'd be on Mars.
Not marching trying to protect science from idiots.
You democrats are really improving education in your towns lol
Dropping dumb refugees in poor neighborhoods is really helping to lol they don't even vote for you lol
|
4/23/2017 1:28:38 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
trackker
Vancouver, WA
34, joined May. 2014
online now!
|
Climate Myth:
It's the sun
"Over the past few hundred years, there has been a steady increase in the numbers of sunspots, at the time when the Earth has been getting warmer. The data suggests solar activity is influencing the global climate causing the world to get warmer."
Climate Fact:
Over the last 35 years the sun has shown a cooling trend. However global temperatures continue to increase. If the sun's energy is decreasing while the Earth is warming, then the sun can't be the main control of the temperature.
Climate experts and biologists led by Jan van Dam at the University of Utrecht in the Netherlands, overlaid a picture of species emergence and extinction with changes that occur in Earth's orbit and axis. The Earth's orbit is not a perfect circle: it is slightly elliptical, and the ellipticality itself goes through cycles of change that span roughly 100,000 and 400,000 years. Its axis, likewise, is not perfectly perpendicular but has a slight wobble, rather like a poorly-balanced child's top, which goes through cycles of 21,000 years. In addition, the axis, as schoolbooks tell us, is also tilted, and this tilt also varies in a cycle of 41,000 years. These three shifts in Earth's pattern of movement are relatively minor compared with those of other planets. But they can greatly influence the amount of radiation -- heat and light -- which Earth receives from the Sun. The effect can be amplified, causing global cooling, affecting precipitation patterns and even creating Ice Ages in higher latitudes, when two or all the cycles peak together.
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/earths-wobble-blamed-for-climate-change.138178/
The Sun is, however, the primary heating agent in this system. The principle of Occam indicates that the simplest answer is most likely correct. The amount of energy coming from the sun dwarfs the heat reservoir of the oceans. The sun is not restricted to heating the atmosphere only. The Sun’s energy directly heats (or cools) the oceans and the earth (land). Dr. Vezier of the U of Ottawa has written a paper that is consistent with this common sense. http://www.friendsofscience.org/documents/veizer2.pdf [Broken] The Sun has been at an 8000 year high. This most likely is the cause of the high ocean temperatures between 1998 and 2004. Anyone who doubts that the sun is the cause need only look at the graphs from the NPAL acoustic thermometry to see that it goes up and down with summer and winter. Comment by Gunnar — October 2, 2006 @ 12:39 pm
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/earths-wobble-blamed-for-climate-change.138178/
|
4/23/2017 1:30:07 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
beanhammer
Denton, TX
52, joined Jun. 2014
|
The earth isn't cooling.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/05/31/sorry-global-warming-alarmists-the-earth-is-cooling/amp/
|
4/23/2017 1:32:27 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
You democrats are really improving education in your towns lol
Dropping dumb refugees in poor neighborhoods is really helping to lol they don't even vote for you lol
Capitalism is what destroyed our educational systems.
You're not going to be able to get the average
American to pay for a private school when the
public school is already the best in the world.
Capitalists needed to wreck it first.
It's the only way they could get people
to pay for basic education.
It's how privatization works.
People won't pay privately for what's available
publicly.
Wreck what's available publicly, then they'll pay
privately.
|
4/23/2017 1:33:27 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/05/31/sorry-global-warming-alarmists-the-earth-is-cooling/amp/
Sorry.
Your link is a lie and leaves out the complete picture.
|
4/23/2017 1:34:15 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012/05/31/sorry-global-warming-alarmists-the-earth-is-cooling/amp/
And opinion piece by a lawyer.
What does science have to say about the temperature? I'm not interested in a lawyer's opinion.
[Edited 4/23/2017 1:34:38 PM ]
|
4/23/2017 1:35:58 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
jitssbaby617
Roslindale, MA
38, joined Jun. 2014
online now!
|
Capitalism is what destroyed our educational systems.
You're not going to be able to get the average
American to pay for a private school when the
public school is already the best in the world.
Capitalists needed to wreck it first.
It's the only way they could get people
to pay for basic education.
It's how privatization works.
People won't pay privately for what's available
publicly.
Wreck what's available publicly, then they'll pay
privately.
Just totally deflected what I said lol
Wanna debate what I wrote do so don't add you bs
|
4/23/2017 1:42:27 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
Just totally deflected what I said lol
Wanna debate what I wrote do so don't add you bs
Um no.
I debunked your myth and pointed out what is actually
happening.
That's not a deflection.
It's a correction of your stupidity.
|
4/23/2017 1:56:26 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
Um no.
I debunked your myth and pointed out what is actually
happening.
That's not a deflection.
It's a correction of your stupidity.
Muldoon, please watch the video in my thread. You might like it.
|
4/23/2017 2:05:03 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
Muldoon, please watch the video in my thread. You might like it.
You do realize there was just as much fake news aimed at
Bernie bros as there were republicans right?
You guys were pushing the same fake scandals as they were.
Jill Stein was literally the Ralph Nader of the 2017 election.
[Edited 4/23/2017 2:05:53 PM ]
|
4/23/2017 2:20:36 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
beanhammer
Denton, TX
52, joined Jun. 2014
|
And opinion piece by a lawyer.
What does science have to say about the temperature? I'm not interested in a lawyer's opinion.
That is the consensus that came directly drom the seventh
Annual climate change conference.
Lies make you look dumb
|
4/23/2017 2:23:31 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
You do realize there was just as much fake news aimed at
Bernie bros as there were republicans right?
You guys were pushing the same fake scandals as they were.
Jill Stein was literally the Ralph Nader of the 2017 election.
Did you watch the video?
|
4/23/2017 2:26:47 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
That is the consensus that came directly drom the seventh
Annual climate change conference.
Lies make you look dumb
No. Presenting an opinion piece from a lawyer that contradicts every verifiable measurement of the earths temperature makes you look like an idiot, and your over confidence is a reflection of the complete ignorance of this country.
|
4/23/2017 2:48:19 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
Did you watch the video?
I got as far as the part where it started trying to blame
all the problems on the Democratic party.
At that point I decided you're turning into
a liberal version of Dreamdare.
Only instead of Ron Paul, it's Bernie.
|
4/23/2017 2:58:52 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
scarredandtatto
Oral, SD
51, joined Aug. 2013
|
No. Presenting an opinion piece from a lawyer that contradicts every verifiable measurement of the earths temperature makes you look like an idiot, and your over confidence is a reflection of the complete ignorance of this country.
MORONS, huh?!
|
4/23/2017 3:00:04 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
I got as far as the part where it started trying to blame
all the problems on the Democratic party.
At that point I decided you're turning into
a liberal version of Dreamdare.
Only instead of Ron Paul, it's Bernie.
It's not the party of FDR and Harry Truman anymore. It's turned corporatist and neoliberal. The reason why Trump won was because voters could no longer see much difference between establishment dems and establishment repubs. Clinton deregulated Wall Street and pushed NAFTA, Obama pushed TPP and embraced corporatism, Hillary once called the TPP the gold standard. She was in bed with Wall Street in a big way just like Bill. She was completely bought and paid for. You are in denial if you thought she gave two shits about the working class.
Would you like me to repost the wikileaks speeches she gave to Wall Street bankers?
There's an old saying in sports. The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. The the election of Tom Perez to the head of the DNC means they haven't changed a damned thing. They just got their collective asses handed to them and they are determined to keep the same old Wall Street loving corporatist cronies in charge.
|
4/23/2017 3:05:03 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
The dems chose Hillary over Bernie in 2016.
|
4/23/2017 3:16:02 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
The dems chose Hillary over Bernie in 2016.
Take a reality check Nole.
The Democratic party didn't give us Trump.
You did.
You and people like you.
A direct quote from Bernie:
"You can't get everything you want over night.
Don't believe me?
Ask the civil rights people.
We've been fighting that issue for over 60 years.
This is not the time for a protest vote. The stakes
are too high."
If you're naive enough to believe that the corporate
overlords and 1%ers were just going to roll over and
quit if Bernie got elected then you have a serious issue
dealing with reality.
The simple fact of the matter is that Bernie didn't get the
votes to get the nomination.
And ultimatly you're ignoring the most obvious and glaring question of all.
"Who benefits from creating a rift and divide in the Democratic party?"
Yeah.
I voted Bernie in the primaries but he didn't get the nomination.
The simple truth you refuse to recognize is that protest votes
is what got Trump elected.
Key states lost by a margin that represented the votes that went to Jill Stein.
|
4/23/2017 3:30:37 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
Huffington Post estimated that if America were to vote between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, 39.2% would vote for Trump and 44.8% would vote for Clinton. If it were down to Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, 37.8% would vote for Trump and 48.8% would vote for Sanders. While the polls to show Clinton over Trump, it’s Sanders who has the most potential of beating him. For democrats to beat Trump, they need a candidate who is the polar opposite of him. Bernie Sanders has political views that are very different, while Clinton shares some key views with Trump, such as their agreement to keep God in the public sphere. In addition, Clinton has accepted donations from Trump, which most Democrats see as a “political nightmare.” For the most part, Democrats are not too happy with Clinton.
According to a CNN poll, 57% of voters say Clinton is untrustworthy, and 55% of voters have an unfavorable view of her. Moreover, Clinton has been through scandals. In 2009, her early secretary days, Clinton’s aides and officials pushed to allow Clinton to use her personal email account in her office, paying little attention to laws and regulations regarding the handling of classified information and the preservation of government records. It wasn’t until just recently that the FBI was informed of the email scandal and began investigating the Clinton foundation. Anderson Cooper asked Clinton the question everyone was thinking in a debate; “Will you say anything to get elected?” Based on her deceitfulness, some democrats would prefer Trump over Clinton. In the end, the public’s unfavorable view of Clinton as an untrustworthy candidate and the FBI investigating Clinton’s emails ruin the chances of Clinton defeating Trump in the election.
[Edited 4/23/2017 3:31:30 PM ]
|
4/23/2017 3:40:15 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
You have been around long enough to remember Dreamdare right?
He couldn't get the conversation going in his threads either
so he tried hijacking everyone elses thread regardless if
it was on topic or not.
[Edited 4/23/2017 3:41:52 PM ]
|
4/23/2017 3:52:50 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
I'm just telling dems that if they don't want anymore Trumps then they have to purge their party of the corporatists and the neoliberals. They have to bring it back to being the party of the working class. The party of FDR and Truman. They do that and nobody like Trump gets in office. Establishment dems and establishment repubs were two sides of the same coin. What makes me sad is that Liz Warren screwed herself for a possible presidential run by not supporting Bernie when it counted and then went against many of her own beliefs by supporting a known corporatist Hillary. Had she stuck to her convictions she'd be sitting pretty for a presidential run in 2020.
|
4/23/2017 4:20:10 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
It's just a shame that in all your Bernie zealotry you forgot
about a few basic facts.
You know, like how she's the one that got the conversation
started dealing with healthcare reform in an attempt
to release the strangle hold the insurance companies had
over healthcare.
Or the world wide speeches given regarding women's
rights and equal treatment.
Or how women's rights got incorporated into
a lot of the treaties she worked as Sec State.
Or how she spearheaded additional medial coverage
for children of low income families.
But no.
She's just a "corporatist" like all the rest.
Right?
I really hope you're not one of these idiots that decided
to vote trump because you couldn't have Bernie.
At least a protest vote for Stein would make sense because of common
core values.
Trump is the antithesis of everything Bernie stands for so anyone making
that move pretty much blows rational thinking out of the water.
|
4/23/2017 4:20:44 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
trackker
Vancouver, WA
34, joined May. 2014
online now!
|
Huffington Post estimated that if America were to vote between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, 39.2% would vote for Trump and 44.8% would vote for Clinton. If it were down to Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, 37.8% would vote for Trump and 48.8% would vote for Sanders. While the polls to show Clinton over Trump, it’s Sanders who has the most potential of beating him. For democrats to beat Trump, they need a candidate who is the polar opposite of him. Bernie Sanders has political views that are very different, while Clinton shares some key views with Trump, such as their agreement to keep God in the public sphere. In addition, Clinton has accepted donations from Trump, which most Democrats see as a “political nightmare.” For the most part, Democrats are not too happy with Clinton.
According to a CNN poll, 57% of voters say Clinton is untrustworthy, and 55% of voters have an unfavorable view of her. Moreover, Clinton has been through scandals. In 2009, her early secretary days, Clinton’s aides and officials pushed to allow Clinton to use her personal email account in her office, paying little attention to laws and regulations regarding the handling of classified information and the preservation of government records. It wasn’t until just recently that the FBI was informed of the email scandal and began investigating the Clinton foundation. Anderson Cooper asked Clinton the question everyone was thinking in a debate; “Will you say anything to get elected?” Based on her deceitfulness, some democrats would prefer Trump over Clinton. In the end, the public’s unfavorable view of Clinton as an untrustworthy candidate and the FBI investigating Clinton’s emails ruin the chances of Clinton defeating Trump in the election.
Huffington and CNN polls? Looks like you forgot the Onion polls retard.
|
4/23/2017 4:35:43 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
It's just a shame that in all your Bernie zealotry you forgot
about a few basic facts.
You know, like how she's the one that got the conversation
started dealing with healthcare reform in an attempt
to release the strangle hold the insurance companies had
over healthcare.
Or the world wide speeches given regarding women's
rights and equal treatment.
Or how women's rights got incorporated into
a lot of the treaties she worked as Sec State.
Or how she spearheaded additional medial coverage
for children of low income families.
But no.
She's just a "corporatist" like all the rest.
Right?
I really hope you're not one of these idiots that decided
to vote trump because you couldn't have Bernie.
At least a protest vote for Stein would make sense because of common
core values.
Trump is the antithesis of everything Bernie stands for so anyone making
that move pretty much blows rational thinking out of the water.
Nope. Stein.
|
4/23/2017 4:41:44 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
Wrong. We've observed speciation. We literally have seen one species evolve into another. End of story.
Evolution is a much of faith based science as the theory of gravity is. If you dont think evolution is scientific fact, then you also must question gravity. Seems pretty stupid to me to question gravity, but whatever.
example of change of kind please.
you can say it has been observed on a macro level all day
|
4/23/2017 4:42:58 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
cafe_express
Mobile, AL
84, joined Mar. 2013
|
delusional twits who contort themselves into philosophical pretzels to avoid scientific truth:
Life isn’t fair. Rather than accept the truth of existence, you avoid reality then shame anyone who adheres and adapts to it. I have more examples of your realityphobia than you have genders, but for brevity will list just three.
Despite providing a sampling of your reality-bending ways, you’ll call me a litany of names, ironically attaching “phobia” to any number of accusations. As if alleging my fear of something makes your argument stronger. Sorry, no. Just because you say a thing doesn’t make it true. A theme which runs through this post like AIDs runs through the homosexual male community.
Your 2017 cause du jour carried over from previous years: mentally ill people controlling the behavior of everyone else. For their feelings sake. I’m writing of transgenderism, wherein someone who believes that which they’re not has their delusions endorsed by the firm hands of the bullying left, who bullies anyone who dares disagree with basic biology: males are males, females are females.
|
4/23/2017 5:39:08 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
example of change of kind please.
you can say it has been observed on a macro level all day
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
Section 5 if you're looking for examples. If you're looking to actually learn something, read the rest.
Evolution is as scientifically verifiable as gravity.
|
4/23/2017 5:45:17 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
scarredandtatto
Oral, SD
51, joined Aug. 2013
|
this "conversation" is hilarious!!! The scary thing is there are still flat earthers out there too!
|
4/23/2017 5:46:49 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
Section 5 if you're looking for examples. If you're looking to actually learn something, read the rest.
Evolution is as scientifically verifiable as gravity.
that is just a grand word for new breed in a species.
most are truly just adaptations.
There is no evidence of a pig growing wings and learning to fly (cross breeding of DIFFERENTspecies), which after all, according to Darwinist's... we humans are fish.
[Edited 4/23/2017 5:48:24 PM ]
|
4/23/2017 5:50:12 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
that is just a grand word for new breed in a species.
Wrong. It is the word for a new species being created.
most are truly just adaptations.
You don't understand how this works at all.
There is no evidence of a pig growing wings and learning to fly (cross breeding), which after all, according to Darwinist's... we humans are fish.
I told you to read the rest to learn something. Obviously you'd rather stick your head in your a** and stick to your understanding of evolution based on what your colon says. There's no helping a willfully ignorant moron. Drink bleach and have a nice day.
|
4/23/2017 5:52:55 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
And all I asked from you is an example.. not a link that provided a bunch of smoke being blown up our asses.
if you believe something than you shound be able to explain and provide an explanation.
I mean, you do act like you know it all.
|
4/23/2017 5:55:43 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
ultrabrat007
Crescent City, CA
41, joined Dec. 2016
|
delusional twits who contort themselves into philosophical pretzels to avoid scientific truth:
Life isn’t fair. Rather than accept the truth of existence, you avoid reality then shame anyone who adheres and adapts to it. I have more examples of your realityphobia than you have genders, but for brevity will list just three.
Despite providing a sampling of your reality-bending ways, you’ll call me a litany of names, ironically attaching “phobia” to any number of accusations. As if alleging my fear of something makes your argument stronger. Sorry, no. Just because you say a thing doesn’t make it true. A theme which runs through this post like AIDs runs through the homosexual male community.
Your 2017 cause du jour carried over from previous years: mentally ill people controlling the behavior of everyone else. For their feelings sake. I’m writing of transgenderism, wherein someone who believes that which they’re not has their delusions endorsed by the firm hands of the bullying left, who bullies anyone who dares disagree with basic biology: males are males, females are females.
Such endorsements from that alternative crowd guarantees that vulnerables become more confused about their sexual self as well as go the wrong direction. Afterwards their wires get crossed and there is no return to the land of normal.. imo
|
4/23/2017 5:56:12 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
Quote from pastmybedtime:
And all I asked from you is an example.. not a link that provided a bunch of smoke being blown up our asses.
if you believe something than you shound be able to explain and provide an explanation.
I mean, you do act like you know it all.
Like I said, you refuse to read. I can't help you. That's why I suggest you wash your willful ignorance down with bleach. Scientists say drinking bleach is fatal, but what do they know.
I don't know it all. Scientists know a great deal and I listen to them because I'm not an ignorant moron.
|
4/23/2017 5:56:45 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
fellowforyou
New York, NY
67, joined Jan. 2010
|
The result could be disastrous.
The Republicans are irresponsible, uneducated.
|
4/23/2017 5:59:00 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
You listen to scientists and put faith in what they tell you because you are not a moron.
look at what you said ^^^^^
That is what a cultist would say when asked to explain indepth their belief system.
|
4/23/2017 6:02:06 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
Quote from pastmybedtime:
You listen to scientists and put faith in what they tell you because you are not a moron.
look at what you said ^^^^^
That is what a cultist would say when asked to explain indepth their belief system.
The church said the same thing when it was discovered the Earth was round.
Go back to bed, or school, or do something that doesn't involve you being a mental retard. I've had it with people who will deny science.
I've said it once, and I'll say it again. Evolution is just a sound a theory as gravity. If you fear falling off a cliff because gravity will carry you to your death but don't believe things evolve, you are selectively choosing which science to believe based on your own bias. Shut the f**k up already and let people with brains handle thinking.
|
4/23/2017 6:07:35 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
You are moving the goal post further and further back.
as I stated initially, I enjoy science and Neil.
I also understand the premises of science.
you are arguing a indoctrinated philosophy that has been embedded in the head since kindergarten and you learned at a young age that if you did not agree, you would be mocked.
This is not a creationism discussion yet me merely asking you for an example.
If you believe something to be true then surly you have evidence to share from personal experiences other than..
Because they told me so
[Edited 4/23/2017 6:08:18 PM ]
|
4/23/2017 6:10:26 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
Quote from pastmybedtime:
I also understand the premises of science.
Obviously not. If you did you would understand the the Theory of Evolution is just a sound a theory as any other scientific theory. Your refusal to acknowledge that and willingness to call evolution a faith based belief is proof that you absolutely do not understand the premises of science.
|
4/23/2017 6:10:57 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
Muldoon, you sure I'm the one hijacking your thread?
|
4/23/2017 6:23:32 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
denail of evolution, denial of global warming, denial of science
in general?
Seems on topic to me.
Hillary is a globalist.....
Yeah not so much.
|
4/23/2017 6:27:42 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
denail of evolution, denial of global warming, denial of science
in general?
Seems on topic to me.
Hillary is a globalist.....
Yeah not so much.
I already proved she's a globalist. I even made a thread about it. Here.
https://DateHookup.dating/thread-1468069.htm
|
4/23/2017 6:31:01 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
trackker
Vancouver, WA
34, joined May. 2014
online now!
|
Hillary is a globalist.....
Yeah not so much.
You wouldn't know what she is, as her directive was to lie to the public while keeping the truth secret.
|
4/23/2017 6:31:55 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
Quote from pastmybedtime:
I also understand the premises of science.
Obviously not. If you did you would understand the the Theory of Evolution is just a sound a theory as any other scientific theory. Your refusal to acknowledge that and willingness to call evolution a faith based belief is proof that you absolutely do not understand the premises of science.
the premises of science is to have observable evidence that is tested over a period of time before any conclusions are made.
already stated this.
its not about my denial yet it is about your belief.
I dont have to prove anything.
Science has a premises that must be followed.
Now I ask.
Example of change of kind.
Not different breeds in a species.
|
4/23/2017 6:33:28 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
You wouldn't know what she is, as her directive was to lie to the public while keeping the truth secret.
The truth is no longer secret. Here.
https://DateHookup.dating/thread-1468069.htm
|
4/23/2017 6:34:02 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
scarredandtatto
Oral, SD
51, joined Aug. 2013
|
I looooooooooooove morons like ^^this^^
They know about 7 "big" words and 3 fancy phrases and try to impress the waitress at the truck stop on the edge of town.
|
4/23/2017 6:36:32 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
Quote from pastmybedtime:Not different breeds in a species.
Already showed you different species. What you call a different breed, scientists call a different species. That's what it means when one group of organisms splits to the point where they can no longer reproduce with the species it evolved from. I shouldn't have to explains this since you say you understand sciemce, yet here I am. Like I said, I cannot help the willfully ignorant.
|
4/23/2017 6:37:46 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
Google this phrase and do your own reading.
examples of evolution before your very eyes
the premises of science is to have observable evidence that is tested over a period of time before any conclusions are made.
already stated this.
its not about my denial yet it is about your belief.
I dont have to prove anything.
Science has a premises that must be followed.
Now I ask.
Example of change of kind.
Not different breeds in a species.
|
4/23/2017 6:40:49 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
Quote from pastmybedtime:Not different breeds in a species.
Already showed you different species. What you call a different breed, scientists call a different species. That's what it means when one group of organisms splits to the point where they can no longer reproduce with the species it evolved from. I shouldn't have to explains this since you say you understand sciemce, yet here I am. Like I said, I cannot help the willfully ignorant.
Those are examples of adaptation in the majority of the examples.
keep believing what they tell you.
perhaps one day they will find the missing link.
[Edited 4/23/2017 6:41:14 PM ]
|
4/23/2017 6:42:59 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
scarredandtatto
Oral, SD
51, joined Aug. 2013
|
aaaaaaaaaand hid debate is over.
|
4/23/2017 6:46:01 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
muldoon1959
Vallejo, CA
58, joined Feb. 2008
online now!
|
perhaps one day they will find the missing link.
Actually, they've found lots of missing links.
Problem is, every time they do find a missing link,
creationists decide there are two more holes that
need to be filled.
(what about the link before that one, and after that one)
|
4/23/2017 6:46:13 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
trackker
Vancouver, WA
34, joined May. 2014
online now!
|
The truth is no longer secret. Here.
https://DateHookup.dating/thread-1468069.htm
Wow, you're dumber than I thought, good bye.
Leftists? Hillary is not left. She's a right wing ruling class globalist/corporatist. Don't know why anyone left of center would defend her.
|
4/23/2017 6:46:47 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
Its like debating with a babtist preacher over the existence of Jesus.
can only take so much of the lunacy
|
4/23/2017 6:47:07 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
Elaborate.
|
4/23/2017 6:47:54 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
trackker
Vancouver, WA
34, joined May. 2014
online now!
|
Elaborate.
There's no helping you, sorry.
|
4/23/2017 6:48:57 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
scarredandtatto
Oral, SD
51, joined Aug. 2013
|
uhhhhhhhh
uh huh.
|
4/23/2017 6:52:48 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
41, joined Apr. 2015
|
Actually, they've found lots of missing links.
Problem is, every time they do find a missing link,
creationists decide there are two more holes that
need to be filled.
(what about the link before that one, and after that one)
of course blurry pictures of bigfoot and lochness is not going to prove anything
|
4/23/2017 6:53:57 PM |
Neil deGrasse Tyson Warns About Having Science-Deniers In Charge | Page 2 |
|
nole_89
Loganville, GA
54, joined May. 2010
|
There's no helping you, sorry.
You really have no idea what is going on do you? Establishment dems vs establishment repubs is like pro wrestling. They talk tough about each other when the cameras are on and then have drinks together when the cameras are off. Two sides of the same coin. They use political correctness to give the illusion that they are different. Economically establishment dems and repubs are the same. They're both globalists and neoliberals.
Bernie and Trump were a little different and the parties that they ran on didn't like them. The party that produced the populist candidate would win.
|