NA

Hey..........if you were the head honcho at NIST who was responsible for writing the faireytale about fire causing #7 to collapse...................you also like 99.9% of the human race would also right the report if your wife and kids lives were at stake??

There are a few that would sacrifice their own lives........but when the family is threatened...it opens up a whole can of new worms

giss

sn't this amazing. Losers like 57 keep saying fire caused the collapse of building 7
=======================================================
Oh yeah???? If you haven't figured it out yet....I [ 57 channels ] am a 9-11 truther???? In other words......I think WTC #7 was brought down by demolition explosives........and fire had as much to do with #7 collapsing as my big toe....nothing, nada, zip, zero.

Wowee. So now your suggesting the "head honcho" responsible for the NIST report revised it out of fear for his life? Got any proof of this? His name, address, cell number, birth certificate, death certificate (you know, just in case), and maybe a beer can so we can check his DNA? I mean, who knows, he might be a hologram.

In all due reality, I don't think the American government was responsible for the attacks, let alone would have gone so far as to utilize holograms, a ball, or rockets, as a shield to coverup what would without a doubt be caught on film. And as mentioned already, a plan as large as the 9/11 attacks would require many participants. There is little to no doubt at least one of these participants would have leaked the story. Lets face it, America is not that good at keeping secrets. If the American government had planned the 9/11 attacks, the plot would have been leaked and the people responsible would likely have ended up in front of a firing squad for treason.

And all this was for what 57? Perhaps fwmusic will help you find the correct answer.

Keep us posted!

We all know there was 4,5, or 6 millions tons of debri but 99.9% of it missed #7 So Silversteen decided to " pull it " or demo it.

giss

Again 57iq, you forgot to mention the hundred million tons of debris
===============================================
Oh c'mon there giss. We all know there was 4,5, or 6 millions tons of debri but 99.9% of it missed #7 So Silversteen decided to " pull it " or demo it. I guess when the projector's malfunctioned [so Flight 93 couldnt crash into WTC#7 ] poor Larry had to pull it and demo it 6-7 hours later that afternoon.

Id bet a dollar to a doughnut that was the plan. Add a holograph of another plane crashing into WTC #7 [ Flight 93 most likely ] but the projector's failed so they had to dig a hole out in Shanksville and add the " Lets roll " heroe spin--- so pride could be absorbed by the braindead sheep.

Then pretend 93 was heading towards the White House

Hey fun " If your a guard at the bank, and your gonna rob the bank.......wouldnt you shoot yourself in the leg or arm to make it look like your an innocent victim???

higgy

I bet you are a bear fan.when the games were so blatantly fixed in the 60 days that the bear fans started booing-- D*ck Butkus would go out and start a phony fight and I bet you fell for it hook line and sinker just like you do everything else.

Your here to : follow orders. Just look at your posts.....a natural order follower you are.

tragic

You know, as someone once said, a lot of Conspiracy Theorists see themselves as Neo in "The Matrix" fighting against a vast evil conspiracy only a few people know about while the sheep remain unaware. I'd say that's quite a huge ego trip. Wouldn't you agree 57channels?
=============================================
You do know it was the CIA that came up with the word " conspiracy theorists " and basically called them a bunch of loons so the CIA could keep doing their dirty deeds without any questions asked by the people.

The Patriots that wanted the TRUTH about JFK were conspiracy theorists or nuts.......?????

The idea that no planes were used in 9/11-- that the crashes were faked with bombs and missiles-- is clearly counter-intuitive. However, logistically, avoiding the use of planes has many benefits if you presume that 9/11 was a false-flag attack. Moreover, there are many pieces of evidence to point to some sort of fakery with regard to the idea that real planes were used.

Note-- real planes may have been used as part of the operation as "fly-bys" -- these would give eye-witnesses something to "grab onto" that they saw a plane that was involved in the event.

Major problem with the no-plane theory-- requires a complicit media and more people involved in the plot. But clearly 9/11 was a huge operation and conceivably many people were willing to lie in service of some operation of which they didn't know the extent. After 9/11, speaking out would mean death.

What this theory DOES explain is the complete inability of the mainstream media to question the official 9/11 story in any way-- because they were in on it!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x73867

I'm talking about the alleged 4 planes that the feds said got hijacked??????

Alot easier and safer to use holographs than risk real planes...but I know that doesn't make any sense to you.

Have you any evidence that holograms (holograph is a malapropism) can be projected effectively under the conditions seen on the day?

tragic

Clearly you were not referring to the four planes the feds said got hijacked, but instead, "real" planes used as "fly-bys". So which is it? Or are you losing your mind?
===========================================
Tired of you baiting me and not understanding or better yet pretending to not understand what I have been saying over and over again. You and the other sheep have ruined this thread. I'll start another thread sometime about 9-11, and hope you don't ruin it. I understand why the truth seekers have left 9-11 threads that get ruined by either idiots or shills.

I'm almost certain this sort of evidence is so well classified that only 57channel knows because he's seen it with his own eye's. To bad nobody else was there. sigh..

Have you any evidence that holograms (holograph is a malapropism) can be projected effectively under the conditions seen on the day?

I recall him challenging me about the LIVE news feed from Chopper 4 and where he claimed they showed no planes...until I told him the exact time and where to look on the LIVE feed that clearly showed the second plane about to hit the Tower.

I think he claimed it was inserted by the Feds, yes, the Feds inserted a plane onto Chopper 4's live feed.

She sure makes a lot of sense to me.

The woman is an idiot, and so are those who would swallow her pathetically lame logic.