Thanks for sharing that!

But I disagree...

You took umbrage with my use of the word "twat"!

The underlying current of that is that you believe women should be spoken to differently than men...which is neither theoretical feminism nor egalitarianism...

When and where alls_fair is involved, expect to take it both barrels chest high in proverbial terms. And you get NO free passes for possession of twat!

Sometimes, you get EXACTLY what you wish for!

If unfairness to men is NOT acceptable, why aren't feminists working to correct those inequalities???

And we back to liberty and justice ESPECIALLY for those with twat???

e·gal·i·tar·i·an
of, relating to, or believing in the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities.

fem·i·nism
the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.


By definition a feminist is an egalitarian. You are confused.

We'll... Correct me if I'm wrong but... Whenever you consciencely choose a side on any issue, you choose responsibility for said group! And if you don't want the responsibility then DON'T REPRESENT OR SUPPORT THEM!

If a group of "skinheads" broke into your home an assaulted you, you wouldn't ONLY be concerned JUST with those who did it. You'd fault the whole group. Why? Bcuz the ones who didn't break in supports. he ones who did and that makes them just as guilty.

So even if you WOULDN'T put your hands on a man and expect him to just take it, you FIGHT AGAINST those men who'll slap back and THAT makes you just as guilty as the woman doing the hitting. %

Rights men already have? Let's take a poll and ask if men consider...

1. Being physically assaulted by a woman and can't strike back in self defense as a "right!"

W. Being forced a take care of a kid(s) that's not his as a "right!"

3. Not disciplining his kids or being accused of abuse... as a "right!"

Let's take a poll and see if men consider these as "Tights!" You said feminism was about EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL so what "All" were you talking about? "All women?"

i like to argue with feminists chics to see if they will put out when they lose their argument just to prove what good sports they are.

There is a big difference between bias in how the law is applied and there actually being inequitable laws. Mylegsarecold is an intelligent man with excellent command of English. He understands the difference.

Laws regarding domestic violence and assault and child custody are not gender specific. Social mores and attitudes have great impact on how they are applied though.

However, in a number of states, only girls and women can be raped..a terrible attrocity against men and boys.

What a shame he struggles with the American language, prepositions and comprehending connotations...

@enigma

Don't blame Obama for taking advantage of what Bush let happen. The illegals weren't a problem when they were scrubbing toilets and cleaning hotel rooms. Now they're taking over a system (handed to them) and people want to get pissy. When they first started coming to America, who made it possible for them to get ANYTHING despite them obviously being illegal? That was a problem loooooong before Obama.

Yeah but I also remember a certain Scorpio vowing to NEVER touch a Libra again.

But I must admit I'm curious of the damage our wrath could do should we ever argue.

Or if we targeted our rage on the same person?

I have looked up the laws, for ALL 50 States. In EVERY state, if a man signs the birth certificate of a child, it is ASSUMED by LAW, that he is the father and has claimed financial responsibility. No state will honor a DNA test, after he has signed the child's birth certificate, to absolve him of the financial responsibility of that child.

By signing the birth certificate of a child a man declares that he will be the father of the child and accepts the responsibilities for this child. I don't see where the problem is. If he doesn't want to be the father for whatever reason, he shouldn't sign the birth certificate.

I think sometimes some men find out AFTER they signed the birth certificate that they are NOT the father.

...are not the biological father.
They still can be the father of the child.

The only study, that was ever conducted on the topic, was done in 1999 by The American Red Cross.

According to their study, it was estimated that approximately 30% of single fathers were the victim of paternity fraud.

So, 17 years ago, about 30% of men were duped daddies and all the money they have had to pay in child support can never be reclaimed, because a woman committing this type of theft is immune from civil or criminal prosecution.

But, you don't see Feminist all up in arms, about THAT gender INEQUALITY, now do you?

And don't even get me started on how the father has to PAY TAXES on the income BEFORE it is deducted, but the lying, cheating, thieving woman does NOT PAY TAXES when collecting it....

And it is not very clear for what purpose is that gun fight.

the usual reason anyone hangs onto anger and hatred...the need to deflect...

Well, in AllsFair speak: For twat purpose? Why, to assassinate the gender with twat.

Cite even ONE case, where a man has actually won that lawsuit, ESPECIALLY when he previously signed the birth certificate and a DNA test later proved his baby momma was nothing but a fraudulent, lying cheating.....woman.

I strongly disagree...

And can assert with supreme confidence that fear is the root cause of anger!