Hillary Lies About Being in New York on 9/11
Unlike Trump's claim to have watched attacks from his window, media shows no interest in debunking Clinton's fib
by Edmund Kozak | Updated 02 Nov 2016 at 11:13 AM
Hillary Clinton fibbed to a crowd of supporters in Florida on Tuesday night about her whereabouts on 9/11.

The comment came while Clinton was in the midst of trying to prove her counterterrorism bona fides.

“I was in New York City on 9/11.”
“I know what happened, not far from here at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando,” Clinton said. “I was in New York City on 9/11 as one of the two senators. I will defeat ISIS. I will protect America,” she continued.

But her story simply doesn’t check out. Then-Sen. Clinton was not in New York City on 9/11 — she was in Washington, D.C., with the rest of Congress.

Of course, while the mainstream media went wild over Donald Trump’s claim that he saw the Twin Towers go down from his office window — actually analyzing the angles in an attempt to prove that he couldn’t have actually seen the towers fall — they have been noticeably silent on the subject of Clinton’s demonstrably false claim.

But alas, the mainstream media is not terribly interested in pointing out the numerous falsehoods in the Secret Life of Hillary Clinton — whether it's her claim to have been in New York on 9/11, her claim to have landed under sniper fire in Bosnia, or her myriad claims about her use of a private email server as secretary of state.

Here is another little tid bit that should make everyone that is not a liberal cringe.
I've been saying for years that soros needs to eat a bullet!!
I wonder is soros had anything to do with Roberts turncoat over obamacare?

Semper Fi !!!

Leaked documents are showing the scandal of George Soros and how he has been using his wealth and influence to corrupt Europe, the U.S., and even our Supreme Court.

George Soros was interested in immigration law and pressured the Supreme Court Justices to approve of Obama’s efforts to rewrite existing immigration law. One memo states, “Grantees are seeking to influence the Justices (primarily via a sophisticated amicus briefs and media strategy) in hopes of securing a favorable ruling in U.S. v Texas, via Investors.

An organization called DC Leaks has published 2,500 documents dated from present day to 2008 that were removed from the servers of the corrupt millionaire’s Open Society Foundation and some of his other organizations.

And yet, the mainstream media are keeping a closed lid on anything to do with Soros. Not because it’s not interesting or important, but, no doubt, because he has ties to the media industry. Only conservative news sites have put out this information to the public.

These documents show the lies and corruption that have come from the hands of George Soros, a man who was very close to Hillary Clinton for several years. Well, you know what happens when you lie with dogs. You get fleas.

Disturbingly, the documents reveal that Soros manipulated many European elections in 2014. He had a “List of European Elections 2014 Projects.”

This document listed 90 projects for 2014 alone. If he was that extensively involved in 2014, I can’t imagine he’s stopped since then. He also gave $4 million to anti-Israeli groups to “challenge Israel’s racist and anti-democratic policies.”

Soros planned to hand over $200,000 to the Center for American Politics to start a smear campaign against conservatives. In 2015, his corrupt Open Society gave $650,000 to “invest in technical assistance and support for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement.”

And it’s more than coincidence that it was after that moment that the BLM movement became more violent and hateful, no longer a “peaceful” movement as they had claimed to be. These documents also stated that Open Society would use “extensive networks” to bring in more refugees under Obama’s reign.

Anyone who has this much power and influence deserves to be looked into by the mainstream media. They do so against anyone who isn’t liberal, but it seems that Soros is protected from scrutiny, though he would deserve it, much like Hillary Clinton does.

During the whole election, Soros appeared to be Hillary’s puppet-master. This past year, he gave around $7 million to Clinton’s PACs alone. It seems that if she were elected, Soros would have been the one in power.

www.angrypatriotmovement.com/soros-and-the-supreme-court/