Oh you mean the phony eyewitnesses, phony flight data, and phony radar recordings??? How about the witnesses that saw a plane [ not 77 of course ] fly over the Pentagon [ white plane ] right before the missile hit the Pentagon. You know----- to give off the illusion that a plane hit it. Dont think the ole F B I interviewed them huh??

Oh...but to be a naive country bumpkin

@SRV

I checked your link out about the Pentacon light poles. How sad is that that the guy in charge of the poles or clean up or [ cant think of the term ] had 2 boys and 2 girls and committed suicide???????????? Yeah right........just like the DC Madam I'm sure. Most likely a good chance he was murdered by the perps

It is obvious Craig Ranke from CIT (citizen investigation team) used nothing but lame manipulation tactics during his interview with the cab driver Lloyde England. The results? With the exception that asshat Craig clearly succeeded in frustrating Mr England, his so-called "investigation" to this day stands as nothing but a rude/cruel joke. Flight data recordings, radar, witnesses all proved it was 77 that knocked down the lampposts. Number of witnesses who claimed they saw a plane fly over and miss the Pentagon? NONE.

DOCTORED UP BULLSHIT.

As far as that cab driver WHOS WIFE IS IN THE FBI,

Quote from srv63:Don't ever feel like your alone thinking your the only ones thinking like you do, you would be amazed how many others are thinking and feeling the EXACT way



Yep, there will never be a shortage of idiots.

[

Keep it up! You are making him look ridiculous

The Lies Are Out There


James Meigs, appointed editor of Popular Mechanics in May 2004, trashes skeptics of the official story of 9/11/01 as irresponsible disgracers of the memories of victims, apart from "we as a society."
This article has a page of Editor's Notes, The Lies Are Out There, written by James Meigs, whose previous columns have praised military technology (such as the UAVs used in Fallujah). Meigs places outside of society anyone who questions the official version of events of 9/11/01:
We as a society accept the basic premise that a group of Islamist terrorists hijacked four airplanes and turned them into weapons against us. ... Sadly, the noble search for truth is now being hijacked by a growing army of conspiracy theorists.
Meigs throws a series of insults at the conspiracy theorists, saying they ignore the facts and engage in elaborate, shadowy theorizing, and concludes his diatribe by saying:
Those who peddle fantasies that this country encouraged, permitted or actually carried out the attacks are libeling the truth -- and disgracing the memories of the thousands who died that day.
Besides trashing the skeptics, and conflating this country with its corrupt leaders, Meig's attempts to legitimate PM's investigation, saying:
We assembled a team of reporters and researchers, including professional fact checkers and the editors of PM, and methodically analyzed all 16 conspiracy claims. We interviewed scores of engineers, aviation experts, military officials, eyewitnesses and members of the investigative teams who have held the wreckage of the attacks in their own hands. We pored over photography, maps, blueprints, aviation logs and transcripts. In every single instance, we found that the facts used by the conspiracy theorists to support their fantasies were mistaken, misunderstood, or deliberately falsified.
This sounds impressive, but the article provides no evidence to back up these claims. It provides no footnotes to source its many assertions, and despite the scores of experts listed in its final section the article cites only a handful of them, and mostly to refute its straw-man claims.

Moreover, bold unsubstantiated claims in the article -- such as PM's assertion that there was only a single interception in the decade before 9/11/01 -- don't inspire confidence in PM's professional fact checkers. It echoes the discredited assertions of official reports such as FEMA's World Trade Center Building Performance Study and the 9/11 Commission Report. It provides no evidence PM investigated the attack -- only evidence that it investigated the 9/11 Truth movement in order to determine how best to discredit it through misrepresentation.
================================================

Jim Miegs and the 3 kiddies tragic, parrot, and cl--ass [ one and the same ]

Quote from higgy51:Talking of DOCTORED BULLSHIT, she is NOT in the FBI, she cleans the offices, she is a CLEANER!!!

Don't forget, the CIT are Conspiracy Nutcsases like yourself, so they are on "your team".

Now, unless you can disprove CIT, you are debunked as she is NOT in the FBI.

Statement from Citizen Investigation Team 12/21/2010:

Pentagon attack cab driver Lloyde England informed us that his wife Shirley Hughes-England works for the FBI. When we asked him what she does for them he remained mysterious and said “She don’t talk about it- I don’t talk about it.” Almost two years later over the phone he told somebody else that she is a “cleaner”.

Not that it should matter. Just because they claimed his wife was in the FBI, how does that prove any misdeed or culpability?

It doesn't. It's just a trick to infer via innuendo and it's lame.

As i bring emphasis to the highlighted statement above, i'm sure you gooberment stooges have proof of Lloyde Englands wife being in the janitorial service. Now lets see it

I'm telling you that she was NOT part of the janitorial crew shill so prove me wrong since it is you stooges claiming that she was so don't try your lame assed tricks on me.

As far as my last post of referring to the very short 10 minute video, here it is stooges and i hope your pee brains can absorb it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2P6o0Dn61jY

Do you even have any witnesses SRV?

I'm telling you that she was NOT part of the janitorial crew shill so prove me wrong since it is you stooges claiming that she was so don't try your lame assed tricks on me.

As far as my last post of referring to the very short 10 minute video, here it is stooges and i hope your pee brains can absorb it

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2P6o0Dn61jY

Ad hominem

Poisoning the well

poisoning the well

Ad hominem

Ad hominem

If your brain isn't limited, why rely so heavily on logical fallacies?

Prove it then, we have Lloydes word she was a cleaner, now you prove us wrong.

We want her badge number or whatever they use!

Well srv? Can you prove she was in the FBI and not as her HUSBAND said, a cleaner?

Hey A.D.D.,cia bullshit about finding the ark i never have commented on and has no place in this forum. Just another prime example of you paid stooges to change the subject when the heat is getting too much for you. Now discredit or criticize the 10 minute video i posted which has some very hard FACTS and not innuendo.

Lets see the proof of her husband saying shes part of a cleaning crew in the pentacon and not the bullshit hearsay of "i heard he later said".Lets see the proof stooge.

Okay srv;

You can fast forward to the 5.55 mark if you so wish and righter there you will hear him say she is a cleaner.

This video is from "your side".

Let's try some logical thoughts here..and FBI agent marries a cab driver? Really?

When the FBI thought he was dead and didn't bother interviewing him, don't you honestly think that if she was AN AGENT they would have known he was still alive, that they would have KNOWN her husband was a taxi driver if she was an AGENT?

Logic isn't your strong suit is it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-KCiwwxtnU