If you had other evidence, you would have already posted it therefore i say your full of shit.

For the record, i gave that one to you only because my gut told me so. You have not PROVED shes part of a janitorial crew.

Lets see if I got this right. 1] The Naudet brothers just happened to be at a spot where all traffic was blocked off...and flmed the 1st missile hitting the north tower. Then they took their film to the lab, added a fuzzy image of some stupid phony plane to the mix. 2] A jumbo jet we ar told crashed into the Pentagon...but no pieces of any plane laying on the lawn on near the crash site except a piece of a helicopter planted there by the F B I. 3] Then we see a plane with no left wing right before it hit the south tower, then it looked like it landed inside the tower, the nose protruded out the other side of the tower after the flimsy wings cut the steel beams and the evaporated fuel melted the other steel beams.

Seems kind of haphazard for anyone to assume any real airplanes flew on 9-11......but robots are robots and if the Reich says jump...the robotic cowards oink " How High "

How the hell can you forget flight 93 57channels, the most believable one of all. A boeing 767 plunges into the earth straight down and 3/4 of everything sink into the ground and the other 1/4 is busted up into pieces so small, they can fit into your hand.OH WAIT, then the debris field is located 8 miles away where they were carried there by the wind

How come OFFICIALS NEVER TOOK PHOTOS OF THE THINGS THEY CLAIM THEY FOUND IN THE 'POND"?


Now that you're probably curious as to what was actually found in the pond (or woods for that matter) we can probably identify what this mystery part was by the photos taken of it at the scene:


Did you see it?

No?

That's because officials never took any, or at least never released any.

Hmm, kinda weird they never showed us any photos of this large piece from Flight 93 that was reportedly recovered from the pond, or found in the woods.

(or was it found in the bushes???)

So what about the engine seen being excavated from the crater in that photo that wasn't released until 4 1/2 years after 9/11?

Is it from a Pratt & Whitney PW2037 engine, the kind Flight 93 had?


Kinda hard to tell since it's so smashed up.

But let's assume it is for the sake of argument.

The obvious first question about this engine is why is it only a few feet under the surface when officials said the black boxes were recovered 15ft & 25ft underground?


Also, doesn't this engine look kind of old and rusted?

Right about now it should start becoming obvious that this is a planted engine scrap.

But planted how and when?

There was a person living in a cottage right around the corner and there is a scrap yard right up the street in plain view.


How were the perps able to plant such an engine scrap without being noticed?

Seems unlikely that they dug up the field and planted it before the "crash".

So realistically, the perps would have to have planted it sometime afterwards.



WHATS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
BOEING 747 ENGINE



MURRAY STREET NEW YORK WTC . THE MURRAY ST SIGN SHOWS YOU THIS IS A VERY VERY SMALL ENGINE..

c l-----ass

I saw the hour documentary that was on tv some 12 years ago and Jim Miegs was the idiot who tried to back up the official ,lie. For 1 solid hour......all he did was use idiotic metaphors and shallow straw man arguments to try and back up the official lie. It was the most pathetic, shallow, hollow, example of some govt. stooge trying to make the sheep think 19 Arabs pulled off the biggie. I bet the piece of govt. dung [ JIm Miegs ] hasnt looked in the mirror ever since....and YOU are exactly like him with your straw man arguments and your pathetic little offensive tactics that only tragic and higgy can stomach. A shill gets cornered.......all it can do is go on some stupid nonsensical offensive tactic rather than logically debating. Keep asking for 100% proof...when there is no 100% proof of anything

As i bring emphasis to the highlighted statement above, i'm sure you gooberment stooges have proof of Lloyde Englands wife being in the janitorial service. Now lets see it

WHATS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
BOEING 747 ENGINE



MURRAY STREET NEW YORK WTC . THE MURRAY ST SIGN SHOWS YOU THIS IS A VERY VERY SMALL ENGINE..

Not sure where you came up with flight 93's flight tragectory, but it did not plunge straight down into earth as this would also contradict theories that anything other than a plane (such as a missile) struck the Pentagon.

As for the small pieces left behind by flight 93, here are some other similar examples of wreckage you might care to comment on. And mind you, neither of these struck a building....

Sosoliso Airlines, Nigeria, 10 December 2005



Airblue, Pakistan, 28 July 2010



Golden Aviation, Colorado, 2 October 1970



Thoughts?

@ Fun,

Hold your horses on that shanksville hoax. We don't want to go there until ALL of the gooberment stooges here answer my 5 questions from a few pages back then i can bury their brainless asses just like 3/4 of their mystery plane flight 93

Here's a big clue:

One is from a 747 and the one on Murray St. isn't. This is sad to watch. You don't know what of type of engine belongs in what plane, and you don't know what type of plane struck the twins.

You're not alone, SRV has the same disability.

If using fear and intimidation, to influence political policies, is terrorism, you'd need quite a bit of verbal gymnastics and cognitive dissonance, to not see America is a terrorist state

all

This country has been invading, bombing & terrorizing other countries for god knows how long, but when something happens here, they got the nerve to call it terrorism if its done by someone else. Gimme a break.
========================================================
If its done by someone else??????? 9-11 was DONE by elements of the US Govt./ military and of course Israel's Mossad. You can call it terrorism...but I call it High Treason and mass murder.

The people seeking the truth, the real truth about that day--- want the real culprits held accountable. Don't you??

tragic

I'd say this is a prime opportunity for 57channels and allnurmouf to compare notes. Was the US Government and Mossad responsible for 911? Or was it Al Qaeda because the US kept F'n around in the Middle East?
=============================================================
I would expect a question like that from Rip Van Winkle who just woke up from a 25 year sleep OR a newscaster whose paid for spreading propaganda. Someone like Joseph Goebbels who got the German sheeple all roused up to go to war.

tragic

Considering the vast number of witnesses you've claimed are being paid to keep their mouths shut, i'd say its no wonder the US Government is still trillions of dollars in debt!
===================================================
No one knows if or how many of the so-called eyewitnesses are being paid off or threatened [ families threatened ] Those who wont sell out--do get threatened I'm sure...... Ron Paul is a good example.

Yes, you do make a good point though about all the stolen money. All the gold that was stolen from the vaults below the WTC BEFORE 9-11. The 2.3 trillion stolen from the Pentagon or if you will [ unaccounted for ] Rumsfeld said on 9-10. The put options on airline stock sold before 9-11 [ gee..did somebody know about 9-11 ? ] The trillions that will be made by the CIA now that the poppies are in full bloom in Afghanistan. The oil in Iraq and the pipeline in Afghanistan and on and on.

There is actually a post in that thread which debunks the whole thing. Did you miss it?

LOLOL Self-debunking truthers. Love it.

I contacted Beachnut at ISF. You may have seen his posts regarding the aircraft. He was a test pilot and he debunked all Balsamo's claims on Pilots 4 Truth.

He will sort out this engine canard once and for all.

Your buddy (so called test pilot but most likely a computer gamer) has had 14 years to debunk the engine on Murray St.How many more years will he need?

You just assumed that he hasn't debunked it already. That's quite thick of you and Beachnut probably did it years ago knowing him. Just wait for the proof and keep your brain dead comments to yourself.

Remember Bottom-Feeder, you have the burden of proof here, not me, or anyone else for that matter.

Tho this illustration is not accurate as far as the angle of the plane hitting the tower or the exact direction that the engine would travel, the most important thing is the actual view of this photograph to be able to put this whole hoax into perspective.We know the plane (supposedly) hit almost center of the building at a bit of a left bank and we know where the exit hole was on the opposite side in the corner of the building.Now draw a straight line toward the corner of Murray St. and Church St.