Select your best hookup:
Local
Gay
Asian
Latin
East Europe

skipthegames apps

Take for instance, you re at the grocery retailer, with an actual list, buying items like kale and arugula! You re in fact feeling great about life and crushing this whole If you re alive and reading this appropriate now, there is a great possibility you have been disappointed about anything. tampa jewish singles meetup A person who can assume ahead is incredibly attractive certainly. I met up with a guy from Tinder and literally the 1st thing he stated to me was, Oh, I was worried you had a major chin from your pictures, but you do not. best way to get laid on craigslist If you get through enough of these initially date queries, you ll have a considerably improved sense as to irrespective of whether or not the connection will come about, and whether or not it ll last.

first gay hookup

I think girls care a lot more about character on dating web sites, where I reckon guys care far more about the photos . single ladies in portland oregon I have thought about guardian soulmates but I believe it might give the incorrect impression of me. I felt sort of weird right after so I named my friend to try and figure out what had just occurred. is charmerly a scam Additional interested in acquiring laughs than collecting details? Try any of the following conversation starters for dates that commence and end on a enjoyable, simple, flirty note.

Home  Sign In  Search  Date Ideas  Join  Forums  Singles Groups  - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!






NO PHONES..NO PHONE CALLS...ITS ALL LIES..

Its was the phone calls that supposedly set up the scenairo that it was Muslims with box cutters...THIS IS NOW PROVEN A LIE...HOAX...This woman Barbara Olson is missing..most likely murdered...



The basis for the conspiracy theory regarding Muslim hijackers with box cutters was based on supposed phone calls made by Barbara Olson, wife of Bush Solicitor General. Solicitor General Olson claimed he talked to his wife on a
cell phone,
spoke with her at length, while she described the hijackings as now dramatized by Hollywood.

When it was proven that a cell phone is incapable of making such calls, Olson claimed it was a “seat back phone.” When it was proven that there were no seat back phones on American Airlines 757 aircraft, nothing further was asked.






Geraldo Rivera Does 911 Truth Segment About Building 7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kP0Hs-v-uJ0#t=178


=========================================

SEE GERALDO CHANGE HIS OPINION ABOUT WTC...AFTER HE SAW THE FACTS...HIGGY..CLASS 5..PARROT....GERALDO - A JEW CHANGED HIS MIND WHEN HE EXAMINED THE FACTS!!!

YOU BOYS NEED TO LEARN TO DO THIS AS WELL....EXAMINE THE FACTS BEFORE FORMING YOU OPINION...this is how the BIG BOYS AND GIRLS do things..

DEMOLITION BROUGHT DOWN THE WTC...FREE FALL ACCELERATION IS ONLY POSSIBLE WITH PROFESSIONAL DEMOLITION..AND EXPLOSIVES..





Judge Napolitano Exposing 9-11 Cover-Up With Col. Anthony Shaffer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7suTyXGybU




6/8/2015 7:34:58 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from class5:
Ok Conspiretard, I found the following:

"The National Transportation Safety Board reported that the flight impacted at 563 mph (906 km/h, 252 m/s, or 489 knots) at a 40-degree nose-down, inverted attitude..."

"National Transportation Safety Board: Flight Path Study – United Airlines Flight 93" (PDF). Homeland Security Digital Library. February 19, 2002. Retrieved 2011-09-12.

So, prove the NTSB figures wrong. This should be good.


Hey Jethro! You missed this^^^^^

Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!

DateHookup.dating - 100% Free Personals


6/8/2015 7:42:45 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Come on Buford, you can do it...

6/8/2015 9:24:14 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,462)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
online now!


Quote from class5:
Hey Jethro! You missed this^^^^^


I see what you posted of your gooberments account of what happened that day to flight 93. The question i'm asking is do you agree with that account or do you have your own opinion? Answer the question then after your fellow shills answer it, class will move on then you three will be PROVEN wrong.

6/8/2015 9:29:08 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,462)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
online now!


After proving you shills wrong about flight 93, then were moving on to the pentagon hoax and were gonna prove a 767 jetliner DID NOT hit the pentagon.

6/9/2015 1:03:01 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
I see what you posted of your gooberments account of what happened that day to flight 93. The question i'm asking is do you agree with that account or do you have your own opinion? Answer the question then after your fellow shills answer it, class will move on then you three will be PROVEN wrong.


I think it is safe to assume that Class and I agree with the NTSB, after all, it is the only official statement available.

So, come on, prove us wrong..or prove the NTSB wrong...not us, as we didn't produce the report, so you won't be proving us wrong at all will you?

What we do notice though is how you sidestep the evidence given to you and avoid answering questions posed.

I am still interest ed as to why anyone would ever take ONE photograph showing BOTH the 1994 and 2001 crash sites.....why would that ever be needed?

6/9/2015 1:09:12 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
I see what you posted of your gooberments account of what happened that day to flight 93. The question i'm asking is do you agree with that account or do you have your own opinion? Answer the question then after your fellow shills answer it, class will move on then you three will be PROVEN wrong.


Oh what do you f**king think, Moron? I did answer it, and it is my opinion, as it is the only valid source for the information.

What do you want me to do? Make something up like 9/11 truth? Just get on with it and stop wasting time.

9/11 truth's best and brightest? One can only shake his or her head.

6/9/2015 1:47:19 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
After proving you shills wrong about flight 93, then were moving on to the pentagon hoax and were gonna prove a 767 jetliner DID NOT hit the pentagon.


Well, that won't be difficult as the Pentagon was struck by a 757-223.



Delmart, you sure do disappoint there, son.



[Edited 6/9/2015 1:49:36 AM ]

6/9/2015 2:07:48 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from class5:
Well, that won't be difficult as the Pentagon was struck by a 757-223.



Delmart, you sure do disappoint there, son.


Dammit Class, will you please stop debunking the fool before he even starts?

He's already been debunked about the found engine (that he said was planted) whereby he claimed it couldn't have belonged to a Boeing as they didn't use that type of engine.

The gash of the Shanksville, debunked once again.

But as ever, he hasn't the balls to stand up and admit he was wrong.

Now you and go and do this to him.

We must be careful, suicide might be a way out for him and his embarrassment.

6/9/2015 3:32:37 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from higgy51:
Dammit Class, will you please stop debunking the fool before he even starts?

He's already been debunked about the found engine (that he said was planted) whereby he claimed it couldn't have belonged to a Boeing as they didn't use that type of engine.

The gash of the Shanksville, debunked once again.


Actually, I've been meaning to say 'well done'. Your patience far exceeds mine.

But as ever, he hasn't the balls to stand up and admit he was wrong.


Well, we can't expect much from the 'shallow end' of the gene pool.

Now you and go and do this to him.

We must be careful, suicide might be a way out for him and his embarrassment.


I can't say it wouldn't be unjustified.

6/9/2015 4:08:43 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from class5:
Actually, I've been meaning to say 'well done'. Your patience far exceeds mine.
.


One has to be patient with those that sadly, suffer from a learning disability. Where it takes a normal, rational and logical person mere seconds to evaluate information and understand it, those that have an infliction need more time and continued explanations and repeated evidence before it finally sinks in.

6/9/2015 4:59:41 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from higgy51:
One has to be patient with those that sadly, suffer from a learning disability. Where it takes a normal, rational and logical person mere seconds to evaluate information and understand it, those that have an infliction need more time and continued explanations and repeated evidence before it finally sinks in.


I see your point and feel shame at how I treat those less fortunate than ourselves. Sir, you move me to humility, and I should have a more caring attitude to those produced in consanguineous relationships.



6/9/2015 5:08:24 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Of course, my word of INFLICTION, should have been AFFLICTION.

My mind was elsewhere on the inflicting of mental pain upon those less mentally able persons with our logical thoughts, comments and facts.

6/9/2015 5:13:19 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from higgy51:
Of course, my word of INFLICTION, should have been AFFLICTION.

My mind was elsewhere on the inflicting of mental pain upon those less mentally able persons with our logical thoughts, comments and facts.


I understood your point despite the mistake. Perhaps their is a truther 'self-preservation mechanism' in the brain, whereby to prevent a software crash the truther brain can reconcile the irreconcilable using a 'cognitive dissonance' protection mechanism? Perhaps this mechanism also makes the truther oblivious to the existence of any contrary evidence to his or hers preconceptions?

Or not...







[Edited 6/9/2015 5:14:57 AM ]

6/9/2015 5:45:10 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014




6/9/2015 6:49:14 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,462)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
online now!


1) What was speed of aircraft when it crashed?

2) At what angle was aircraft when it was decending right as it made contact with the ground?

3) Was aircraft right side up, upside down or sideways when it made contact with the ground?

4) What is the weight of one single engine of the two engines on the aircraft?

5) How many eye witnesses reported seeing and hearing the jetliner right before it crashed?

Answer the questions whether it be your gooberments official story or your own assumption, this way it is YOU being proved wrong as your gooberments official story is debunked.Come on now, times a wasting

6/9/2015 6:52:59 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
1) What was speed of aircraft when it crashed?


Done.

2) At what angle was aircraft when it was decending right as it made contact with the ground?


Done.

3) Was aircraft right side up, upside down or sideways when it made contact with the ground?p


Done.

4) What is the weight of one single engine of the two engines on the aircraft?


I don't give a f**k.

5) How many eye witnesses reported seeing and hearing the jetliner right before it crashed?


Already posted the testimony.

Answer the questions whether it be your gooberments official story or your own assumption, this way it is YOU being proved wrong as your gooberments official story is debunked.Come on now, times a wasting


Go f**k yourself and get on with it troll. You're the only one wasting time, Shit for Brains. I'm not jumping through any more of your hoops as I don't have the burden of proof. Get on with it or f**k off.



[Edited 6/9/2015 6:53:59 PM ]

6/9/2015 7:14:27 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


On the seismic records for the Shanksville crash (scroll down the page for Shanksville)

http://911research.wtc7.net/mirrors/guardian2/wtc/seismic/WTC_PENT_KIM.htm

6/9/2015 7:25:22 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
1) What was speed of aircraft when it crashed?

2) At what angle was aircraft when it was decending right as it made contact with the ground?

3) Was aircraft right side up, upside down or sideways when it made contact with the ground?

4) What is the weight of one single engine of the two engines on the aircraft?

5) How many eye witnesses reported seeing and hearing the jetliner right before it crashed?

Answer the questions whether it be your gooberments official story or your own assumption, this way it is YOU being proved wrong as your gooberments official story is debunked.Come on now, times a wasting


Hey Bo, how's that 767 and the Pentagon thing going for ya?



6/9/2015 7:32:28 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,107)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


cl ass

Go f**k yourself and get on with it troll. You're the only one wasting time, Shit for Brains. I'm not jumping through any more of your hoops as I don't have the burden of proof. Get on with it or f**k off.
===================================================
Gee, one of the three kiddies keeps calling the truth seekers and Patriots a troll, time after time. You are a pro though class at looking up govt. propaganda sites and links. The other 2 kiddies I'm sure are proud of you.EXperts who are speaking out and have done so for 14 years because they saw hundreds of inconsistencies in the official lie........and you rip them all.

The rabble [govt. stoolies] like you and the other 2 kiddies that frequent this page......I think are the first to go. Go ahead and ask for more proof like you've done for 14 fkn years

6/9/2015 7:35:25 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
cl ass

Go f**k yourself and get on with it troll. You're the only one wasting time, Shit for Brains. I'm not jumping through any more of your hoops as I don't have the burden of proof. Get on with it or f**k off.
===================================================
Gee, one of the three kiddies keeps calling the truth seekers and Patriots a troll, time after time. You are a pro though class at looking up govt. propaganda sites and links. The other 2 kiddies I'm sure are proud of you.EXperts who are speaking out and have done so for 14 years because they saw hundreds of inconsistencies in the official lie........and you rip them all.

The rabble [govt. stoolies] like you and the other 2 kiddies that frequent this page......I think are the first to go. Go ahead and ask for more proof like you've done for 14 fkn years


There you go again proving my point. You do it everytime! F**king brilliant! One thing I can count on is your stupidity.

You whinge about me calling you a troll by trolling. Priceless!

Here's an idea, troll, try addressing the evidence...you know, that stuff you seem to be allergic to.



[Edited 6/9/2015 7:36:02 PM ]

6/9/2015 7:38:23 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


It would nice if one of these crayon eaters from 9/11 truth actually addressed the evidence.

What is with all the delaying and evading tactics? Is it because they have no case and they know it?

6/9/2015 7:56:37 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,462)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
online now!


Quote from class5:
It would nice if one of these crayon eaters from 9/11 truth actually addressed the evidence.

What is with all the delaying and evading tactics? Is it because they have no case and they know it?


You will get all the debunking that you can handle AFTER you answer the 5 questions cream puff. Now put your big girl pants back on and lose the tantrums and answer the 5 itty bitty questions so i can show you how to eat your own shit

6/9/2015 8:10:19 PM  

progrocknic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (12,498)
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012


Quote from class5:
It would nice if one of these crayon eaters from 9/11 truth actually addressed the evidence.

What is with all the delaying and evading tactics? Is it because they have no case and they know it?


If people weren't willfully ignorant, there would be no 9/11 truthers.

6/9/2015 9:01:03 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,462)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
online now!


Quote from progrocknic:
Quote from class5:
It would nice if one of these crayon eaters from 9/11 truth actually addressed the evidence.

What is with all the delaying and evading tactics? Is it because they have no case and they know it?


If people weren't willfully ignorant, there would be no 9/11 truthers.


Good, shill number 4 has joined us. Care to answer the 5 questions asked above shill or are you intimidated like your sisters?

6/10/2015 12:19:42 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from progrocknic:
Quote from class5:
It would nice if one of these crayon eaters from 9/11 truth actually addressed the evidence.

What is with all the delaying and evading tactics? Is it because they have no case and they know it?


If people weren't willfully ignorant, there would be no 9/11 truthers.


Exactly, 9/11 truthers are not the brightest that the gods ever shovelled guts into. Look at this clown trying to control the debate-he hasn't the foggiest of what is going on and he doesn't even know what type of plane hit the Pentagon.

6/10/2015 12:20:33 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Good, shill number 4 has joined us. Care to answer the 5 questions asked above shill or are you intimidated like your sisters?


Intimidated? LOLOL By you? LOLOL Tantrums? You sure have an over active imagination, but then if you didn't, you wouldn't be a truther.

I've answered your lame questions so put up or f**k off.



[Edited 6/10/2015 12:22:37 AM ]

6/10/2015 12:27:30 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
You will get all the debunking that you can handle AFTER you answer the 5 questions cream puff. Now put your big girl pants back on and lose the tantrums and answer the 5 itty bitty questions so i can show you how to eat your own shit


LOLOL Funny guy. I've answered your questions so you are obviously trolling. Furthermore, I doubt you're capable of debunking anything, but be my jest. Meanwhile, I'll wait for the anti-climax, and as you've already stalled for three pages, I don't expect to see anything of any merit.



[Edited 6/10/2015 12:29:09 AM ]

6/10/2015 12:43:03 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
1) What was speed of aircraft when it crashed?

2) At what angle was aircraft when it was decending right as it made contact with the ground?

3) Was aircraft right side up, upside down or sideways when it made contact with the ground?

4) What is the weight of one single engine of the two engines on the aircraft?

5) How many eye witnesses reported seeing and hearing the jetliner right before it crashed?

Answer the questions whether it be your gooberments official story or your own assumption, this way it is YOU being proved wrong as your gooberments official story is debunked.Come on now, times a wasting


All your questions have already been answered and now you throw in a new one of the engine weight.

I see you are really struggling to keep your composure and no balls.

However, the weight of the engine is 7,100lbs.

Questions 2 and 3 are virtually the same.

Eye witnesses? Many, quite a few.

Speed of the aircraft, estimated at 538 mph.

There you go, THREE times you have now been answered, so when you have finished at clutching at straws....

Hey, I got one for you:

The engine that was found at Murray Street, what type areoplane used those type of engine?

6/10/2015 9:22:40 AM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,107)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


the three kitties playing in the sandbox making castles together.patting each other on the back saying we got to get them damn Arabs that brought down the big towers while playing.

a grownup comes along and says hey kids Ben Laden had nothing to do with 911 he even admitted it. our government did it along with Israel's Mossad to create the phony war on terror.

then the kitties stood up in there sandbox grab some sand and started throwing it at the grown ups and saying why don't you move to another country blah blah blah blah blah

6/10/2015 1:21:29 PM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
the three kitties playing in the sandbox making castles together.patting each other on the back saying we got to get them damn Arabs that brought down the big towers while playing.

a grownup comes along and says hey kids Ben Laden had nothing to do with 911 he even admitted it. our government did it along with Israel's Mossad to create the phony war on terror.

then the kitties stood up in there sandbox grab some sand and started throwing it at the grown ups and saying why don't you move to another country blah blah blah blah blah


Repetition again!

We know Bin Laden had nothing to do with 9/11, we really do.

Please, please do show us where he actually ADMITTED he was behind 9/11...or forever be debunked.

6/10/2015 1:23:32 PM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
the three kitties playing in the sandbox making castles together.patting each other on the back saying we got to get them damn Arabs that brought down the big towers while playing.



JHey 57....what engine did the one found at Murray street belong to..which plane?

Bear in mind, one of your "inmates" says it wasn't possible to be one of the \Boeing's.

6/10/2015 1:33:46 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,107)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

Please, please do show us where he actually ADMITTED he was behind 9/11...or forever be debunked.
==========================================
Never heard of the tapes [ doctored up video and audio by the CIA ] to make it look like he was behind 9-11?? Where you been?? Surely is that why you ditto the official story or have you finally woke up?? If not who was behind 9-11??

6/10/2015 1:41:34 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,107)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

JHey 57....what engine did the one found at Murray street belong to..which plane?
=====================================================
The only think I know about the alleged engine found on Murray street is that it couldnt have belonged to Flight 175 or Flight 11 because none of those planes flew that day or at least Flight 11 never flew that day. Flight 175??? Who knows what really happened to that flight?? Only a few perps Im sure.

Instead of saying the Pledge with the other two kiddies...say this out loud every night. There were no planes, no hijackers, fake videos, fake eyewitnesses......a very lousy false flag staged event by our own govt. and Israel

6/10/2015 2:51:20 PM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

Please, please do show us where he actually ADMITTED he was behind 9/11...or forever be debunked.
==========================================
Never heard of the tapes [ doctored up video and audio by the CIA ] to make it look like he was behind 9-11?? Where you been?? Surely is that why you ditto the official story or have you finally woke up?? If not who was behind 9-11??


Oh, doctored to make believe he was behind 9/11?

Why is it that no-one believes he was, except you CT nuts saying he said it?

6/10/2015 2:54:18 PM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

JHey 57....what engine did the one found at Murray street belong to..which plane?
=====================================================
The only think I know about the alleged engine found on Murray street is that it couldnt have belonged to Flight 175 or Flight 11 because none of those planes flew that day or at least Flight 11 never flew that day. Flight 175??? Who knows what really happened to that flight?? Only a few perps Im sure.



Shit, I forgot, you are one of the very few that have been banned from the CT sites for being a no-planer.
It is just that your fellow nutcase said it couldn't have been from a Boeing because they didn't use those engines.

Nice to see you backing him up!! Wait, you aren't...you are saying "Hey fool, no planes flew"

6/10/2015 5:29:11 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
the three kitties playing in the sandbox making castles together.patting each other on the back saying we got to get them damn Arabs that brought down the big towers while playing.

a grownup comes along and says hey kids Ben Laden had nothing to do with 911 he even admitted it. our government did it along with Israel's Mossad to create the phony war on terror.

then the kitties stood up in there sandbox grab some sand and started throwing it at the grown ups and saying why don't you move to another country blah blah blah blah blah



You really are a first class moron. Why should we believe anything you, or the other dupes say, especially as you don't have any supporting evidence?

To blindly follow what anyone claims without supporting evidence is moronic don't you think? Or is that the norm with you?

FFS! You can barely construct a sentence!

6/10/2015 9:01:10 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,462)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
online now!


Quote from class5:
You really are a first class moron. Why should we believe anything you, or the other dupes say, especially as you don't have any supporting evidence?

To blindly follow what anyone claims without supporting evidence is moronic don't you think? Or is that the norm with you?

FFS! You can barely construct a sentence!


Remember the highlighted statement above that you yourself made shill. Higgy has half assed answered the 5 questions that i posted like ions ago so now it's time for you to pull up your panties and answer the same 5 questions so we can finally get this show on the road and finally tattoo your above statement to your vagina because the words DUMB F**K are already taking up all the room on that forehead of yours

5 itty bitty questions cream puff

6/10/2015 9:28:48 PM  
aposorichie
Over 2,000 Posts (3,253)
Berwyn, IL
59, joined Jan. 2009


Quote from higgy51:
Shit, I forgot, you are one of the very few that have been banned from the CT sites for being a no-planer.
It is just that your fellow nutcase said it couldn't have been from a Boeing because they didn't use those engines.

Nice to see you backing him up!! Wait, you aren't...you are saying "Hey fool, no planes flew"


It is kind of funny come to think of it with the way way out there beyond control crowd

comin on with goofiness.

LALALALA...

6/10/2015 11:40:40 PM  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (15,162)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007


Quote from srv63:
Remember the highlighted statement above that you yourself made shill. Higgy has half assed answered the 5 questions that i posted like ions ago so now it's time for you to pull up your panties and answer the same 5 questions so we can finally get this show on the road and finally tattoo your above statement to your vagina because the words DUMB F**K are already taking up all the room on that forehead of yours

5 itty bitty questions cream puff


Cream Puffs...lmao fer sure..



Interestingly..these mental midgets go around these threads..never reading what you wrote..or the vids you posted as proof of your position..and yet..they have an opinion..

Always calling names...slandering us...trying to put us down...never realizing that any strangers here that come and read these threads..can easily see who the mental midgets are.

but they keep patting each other on the back..as they hurl their insults..backed with no links..no information at all..

JUST THEIR CONTINUAL ORAL DIARRHEA STREAM OF COMMENTS...FULL OF SHIT..WITH NO CONSISTENCY..and the funniest of all is that they think they are smarter than us..

Thats like claiming to be a scholar without cracking open one book and actually reading it..

THEY ARE OUT STANDING IN THEIR FIELDS..... Thats what they do best..NOTHING.

6/10/2015 11:54:11 PM  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (15,162)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

JHey 57....what engine did the one found at Murray street belong to..which plane?
=====================================================
The only think I know about the alleged engine found on Murray street is that it couldnt have belonged to Flight 175 or Flight 11 because none of those planes flew that day or at least Flight 11 never flew that day. Flight 175??? Who knows what really happened to that flight?? Only a few perps Im sure.

Instead of saying the Pledge with the other two kiddies...say this out loud every night. There were no planes, no hijackers, fake videos, fake eyewitnesses......a very lousy false flag staged event by our own govt. and Israel


THEY CANT ADMIT IT..THEY ARE ISRA-HELLIS..HERE TO TWIST THE TRUTH..INTO KOL NIDRE LIES..

ITS THEIR 'YOB'...

6/11/2015 12:47:16 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
Remember the highlighted statement above that you yourself made shill. Higgy has half assed answered the 5 questions that i posted like ions ago so now it's time for you to pull up your panties and answer the same 5 questions so we can finally get this show on the road and finally tattoo your above statement to your vagina because the words DUMB F**K are already taking up all the room on that forehead of yours

5 itty bitty questions cream puff


He has answered them.

I note you fail to answer my ONE question though, but hey, I will play along with you. I know you CANNOT answer mine, it only shows you in a bad light doesn't it?

Remember my ill-informed friend, it was YOU that bought up the question about the engine in Murray Street, no-one else, just you. You just didn't like the answer did you?

6/11/2015 1:09:36 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

Please, please do show us where he actually ADMITTED he was behind 9/11...or forever be debunked.
==========================================
Never heard of the tapes [ doctored up video and audio by the CIA ] to make it look like he was behind 9-11?? Where you been?? Surely is that why you ditto the official story or have you finally woke up?? If not who was behind 9-11??


No, I haven't heard those tapes BTW, so please provide a LINK to them.

Do you think you can do that? (I doubt it).

6/11/2015 1:10:14 AM  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (15,162)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007


Quote from srv63:
After proving you shills wrong about flight 93, then were moving on to the pentagon hoax and were gonna prove a 767 jetliner DID NOT hit the pentagon.


If a jet liner hit the Penta-CON...it would have blown all the cars off the hiway..and swept away with it..all those light posts...and destroyed everything in its path

THE NOISE WOULD HAVE BEEN SO HORRIFIC...it would have been mentioned..but it was not..ONLY A SWOOSHING SOUND..like a missle would make..

6/11/2015 1:44:55 AM  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (15,162)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007




http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/29/911-video-of-missile-hitting-pentagon-leaked/












VIDEO SHOWS MISSLE HITTING PENTA-CON..not a jet...

Cruise Missle Hits Pentagon CLASSIFIED

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7KDbHOUso8






Try watching the video for a change CREAM PUFFS..so you can be as smart as we.


===================================================
NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON...NO PLANES HIT THE WTC...NO PLANES HIT BUILDING #7..AND YET ALL THREE FELL PEFECTLY INTO THEIR OWN FOOTPRINT..And were supposed to beleive the official "story" OPPS.. I mean Official KOL NIDRE LIE..


http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/29/911-video-of-missile-hitting-pentagon-leaked/
According to experts on 9/11, engineers, pilots, intelligence officers and members of our military, Jesse Ventura “hit the nail on the head.” Ventura, using evidence developed over 9 years by hundreds of individuals, outlines the utter impossibility of the government’s cover story on 9/11 and systematically debunks it using testimony and scientific evidence.

Ventura cites, in an interview with a 9/11 commissioner, a possible motive for the Pentagon attack being included with the attacks on the World Trade Center. $2,300,000,000,000, yes 2.3 trillion US dollars had disappeared, cited only the day before in a televised statement by Secretary Rumsfeld, money “gone missing” from the Pentagon’s accounting. The area of the Pentagon hit by a missile or destroyed by explosives or both contained all records of this missing money.

NO PLANE, NO WAY, NOT EVEN CLOSE

Ventura proves, beyond any doubt that no airplane ever hit the Pentagon. As the video shows, not even a highly trained airline pilot was capable of the maneuvers claimed. Long before, it had been proven that the 757 was incapable of the task, either the maneuvers or the speed and trajectory. The plane would have come apart, there is no disagreement with this and hasn’t been for some time, yet nothing had been done. Why?

It is also clearly shown that there is absolutely no evidence of any kind showing a plane hit the Pentagon, no wreckage, no bodies, no luggage. Items claimed to have been taken to Dover Air Force Base, bodies, plane parts, were never at the Pentagon as both video and testimony prove.

There is also proof that the government threatened witnesses, telling them to support the “aircraft scenario.”


“thought it was a bomb…walked out through the hole..burning wreckage..no plane parts…threatened to keep silent”

Many witness have mysteriously ended up dead..I presume they would not agree to go along with the official "LIE" opps..I mean official 'story'
6/11/2015 9:48:19 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

JHey 57....what engine did the one found at Murray street belong to..which plane?
=====================================================
The only think I know about the alleged engine found on Murray street is that it couldnt have belonged to Flight 175 or Flight 11 because none of those planes flew that day or at least Flight 11 never flew that day. Flight 175??? Who knows what really happened to that flight?? Only a few perps Im sure.



So you don't agree with your fellow conspiracy nutcase that the engine didn't belong to a 757?

That means you DO believe it DID belong to such an plane and are, naturally, debunking him and telling him to "pay attention and do some research because you fool, you are making us (us being conspiracy nutcases) all look foolish with you stupid comments...fool, it's been proven that the 757 DID use that sort of engine, now shut up before you makes us look even more foolish"

6/11/2015 9:49:54 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from funwithmusic:
If a jet liner hit the Penta-CON...it would have blown all the cars off the hiway..and swept away with it..all those light posts...and destroyed everything in its path

THE NOISE WOULD HAVE BEEN SO HORRIFIC...it would have been mentioned..but it was not..ONLY A SWOOSHING SOUND..like a missle would make..


Why would a jetliner have blown all the cars off of the highway?

Oh, btw, it DID knock down the light posts.

6/11/2015 11:44:30 AM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,107)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

you really are reaching rock bottom by trying to put words in my mouth or twisting the words the f***** engine on Mary street was not one that was flown by a big jumbo jet a 757 or a 767 that was not a Pratt Whitney engine.

so keep searching and picking through every word us truth seekers say and try to catch us on one word that doesn't fit perfectly and blow it all out of proportion. don't you have any pride at all?

6/11/2015 11:59:47 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

you really are reaching rock bottom by trying to put words in my mouth or twisting the words the f***** engine on Mary street was not one that was flown by a big jumbo jet a 757 or a 767 that was not a Pratt Whitney engine.

so keep searching and picking through every word us truth seekers say and try to catch us on one word that doesn't fit perfectly and blow it all out of proportion. don't you have any pride at all?


No, you are very correct, it wasn't a Pratt Whitney engine, but so what?

Your friend has already been debunked and so are you, again. This was debunked wayyyyyyy back on page 76 . This just proves you don't read much on the subject!!

Once again, both you and your friend to tend to side step answers that don't suit you.

Your friend posted this below identifying the engine and claiming AA ONLY used a PW engine, well guess what?

Boeing - 767 used the CF6 engine

http://aircraft.wikia.com/wiki/Boeing_767
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_CF6

The General Electric CF6 is a family of high-bypass turbofan engines produced by GE Aviation. A development of the first high-power high-bypass jet engine available, the TF39, the CF6 powers a wide variety of civilian airliners. The basic engine core formed the basis for the LM2500, LM5000, and LM6000 marine and power generation turboshaft. GE intends to replace the CF6 family with the GEnx.


After developing the TF39 for the C-5 Galaxy in the late 1960s, GE offered a more powerful variant for civilian use, the CF6, and quickly found interest in two designs being offered for a recent Eastern Airlines contract, the Lockheed L-1011 and McDonnell Douglas DC-10. The L-1011 eventually selected the Rolls-Royce RB211, but the DC-10 stuck with the CF6, and entered service in 1971. It was also selected for versions of the Boeing 747. Since then, the CF6 has powered versions of the Airbus A300, 310 and 330, Boeing 767,



Quote from srv63:

Question 2. The engine found on murry street was either a cfm56 or a cf6, both made by general electric (owned by rockefeller) but unfortunately american airlines only used pratt-whitney engines on ALL of their 767 aircraft



6/11/2015 12:55:31 PM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,431)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
No, I haven't heard those tapes BTW, so please provide a LINK to them.

Do you think you can do that? (I doubt it).


Hey 57?

I see you missed this request for the link to these so called tapes you state were doctored.

Come on 57, can you back up your wild claim or are you, once again, lying?

Quote from 57channels:
higgy

Please, please do show us where he actually ADMITTED he was behind 9/11...or forever be debunked.
==========================================
Never heard of the tapes [ doctored up video and audio by the CIA ] to make it look like he was behind 9-11?? Where you been?? Surely is that why you ditto the official story or have you finally woke up?? If not who was behind 9-11??




[Edited 6/11/2015 12:56:15 PM ]

6/11/2015 5:04:22 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,107)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


Could the CIA group of “dark skinned actors” have been behind the infamous December 2001 “Fat nosed” Bin Laden video, that was magically found in a house in Jalalabad after anti-Taliban forces moved in?
The tape featured a fat Osama laughing and joking about how he’d carried out 9/11. The video was also mistranslated in order to manipulate viewer opinion and featured “Bin Laden” praising two of the hijackers, only he got their names wrong. This Osama also used the wrong hand to write with and wore gold rings, a practice totally in opposition to the Muslim faith.
Despite the fact that the man in the video looks nothing like Bin Laden, the CIA stood by it and declared it to be the official “9/11 confession video”.
The latest revelations also shed light on another past Bin Laden release – a tape in which he ludicrously declared himself in league with Saddam Hussein in the weeks before the invasion of Iraq.
The notion that the CIA project was taken over and drastically improved by the Pentagon at some point after 2003 jives with the improvement in quality of Bin Laden videos in later years. Most notably the video that was released immediately ahead of the 2004 election, and it’s digitally manipulated duplicate from 2007, in which Bin Laden appeared to have a dyed beard.
For a run down of some of the most notoriously dubious Bin Laden videos see the following article.
New Bin Laden “Confession” Tape: Fake Like The Rest?

https://DateHookup.dating/Forums.aspx?p=REPLY&forumthreadID=1412144&startat=1306

6/11/2015 5:21:57 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Remember the highlighted statement above that you yourself made shill. Higgy has half assed answered the 5 questions that i posted like ions ago so now it's time for you to pull up your panties and answer the same 5 questions so we can finally get this show on the road and finally tattoo your above statement to your vagina because the words DUMB F**K are already taking up all the room on that forehead of yours

5 itty bitty questions cream puff


Ok troll. I've had enough of your drivel. You are blocked F**kstain.

6/11/2015 5:24:29 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from funwithmusic:
Cream Puffs...lmao fer sure..



Interestingly..these mental midgets go around these threads..never reading what you wrote..or the vids you posted as proof of your position..and yet..they have an opinion..

Always calling names...slandering us...trying to put us down...never realizing that any strangers here that come and read these threads..can easily see who the mental midgets are.

but they keep patting each other on the back..as they hurl their insults..backed with no links..no information at all..
JUST THEIR CONTINUAL ORAL DIARRHEA STREAM OF COMMENTS...FULL OF SHIT..WITH NO CONSISTENCY..and the funniest of all is that they think they are smarter than us..

Thats like claiming to be a scholar without cracking open one book and actually reading it..

THEY ARE OUT STANDING IN THEIR FIELDS..... Thats what they do best..NOTHING.


Another troll. You haven't been able to address anything I've posted troll, but your quite liberal with the personal attacks. Did the reality of my Sandy Hook posts offend you? Good.

Why don't you ever address the evidence?



[Edited 6/11/2015 5:27:50 PM ]

6/11/2015 5:25:42 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from higgy51:
Hey 57?

I see you missed this request for the link to these so called tapes you state were doctored.

Come on 57, can you back up your wild claim or are you, once again, lying?


57 doesn't answer questions. It's beneath him.

6/11/2015 6:00:03 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,107)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


We have George W. Bush admitting that bin Laden helped him win the election. We have confirmed analysis that proves past alleged bin Laden audiotapes and videotapes are forgeries. We have bin Laden’s 9/11 confession tape being mysteriously discovered by US forces in someone’s video cabinet in Jalalabad, a city with a population of 250,000. That gives us odds of at least 250,000 to one that US forces would happen to raid that house, find that videotape and find it interesting enough to pop in the VCR.

http://wtfrly.com/2013/07/25/911truth-wtfact-49-the-fake-osama-bin-laden-videos-other-shadow-govt-bs/#.VXoSK_lViko

6/11/2015 6:30:35 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
We have George W. Bush admitting that bin Laden helped him win the election. We have confirmed analysis that proves past alleged bin Laden audiotapes and videotapes are forgeries. We have bin Laden’s 9/11 confession tape being mysteriously discovered by US forces in someone’s video cabinet in Jalalabad, a city with a population of 250,000. That gives us odds of at least 250,000 to one that US forces would happen to raid that house, find that videotape and find it interesting enough to pop in the VCR.

http://wtfrly.com/2013/07/25/911truth-wtfact-49-the-fake-osama-bin-laden-videos-other-shadow-govt-bs/#.VXoSK_lViko


Actually, it was not confirmed, that's just the by-line. I don't buy that shit as it doesn't offer any hard evidence other than suspicion based upon blurry images.

Unconfirmed.



[Edited 6/11/2015 6:31:49 PM ]

6/11/2015 11:40:08 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,462)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
online now!


@ Higgy,

Here's some facts for you.I recommend you watching the whole video (very informative) but if you just want the facts about the planted engine on murray street, watch from 15:25 thru 17:00.If you shills really cared to know the truth, you all would watch the whole video with FACTS and then see what logic tells you.

Example: From the looks of the holes in the sides of each trade tower, you would think a military tank got hurled at them at 500 miles per hour. Jetliners tho pretty big,are delicate as hell and no way in hell could have broke thru huge metal beams or even concrete.Watch the full video to see the proof.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4d2Mt2a6iM

As for the other shills that have not answered my 5 questions on the shanksville crash site hoax, i'm paying no attention to your dumb asses until you answer said questions then i will prove you morons wrong then class can move forward to the pentagon hoax.

6/11/2015 11:58:05 PM  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (15,162)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007


Quote from srv63:
@ Higgy,

Here's some facts for you.I recommend you watching the whole video (very informative) but if you just want the facts about the planted engine on murray street, watch from 15:25 thru 17:00.If you shills really cared to know the truth, you all would watch the whole video with FACTS and then see what logic tells you.

Example: From the looks of the holes in the sides of each trade tower, you would think a military tank got hurled at them at 500 miles per hour. Jetliners tho pretty big,are delicate as hell and no way in hell could have broke thru huge metal beams or even concrete.Watch the full video to see the proof.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4d2Mt2a6iM

As for the other shills that have not answered my 5 questions on the shanksville crash site hoax, i'm paying no attention to your dumb asses until you answer said questions then i will prove you morons wrong then class can move forward to the pentagon hoax.


Class 5 blocked you because you had him up against the wall...so to try to save face..and avoid answering your questions..HE BLOCKED YOU.




He always accuses me..and others of calling names..etc...and yet..he is the worst..but he cant smell his own stink..


He needs to grow up..and learn how to debate..WHEN HAVING AN ON GOING CONVERSATION..YOU DONT BLOCK SOMEONE SO AS TO GIVE YOURSELVES THE ADVANTAGE..It only makes one look.. rather chicken shit..



HE ALWAYS CLAIMS I NEVER ANSWER HIS QUESTIONS..and yet..i answer them one at a time..if you all will go back and look...I ANSWER EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM....



These libs dont read what we write

These libs dont watch the videos..and yet still have an opinion

These libs think they just get divine knowledge..and dont have to work for anything


I wonder if they are all WELFAREITES...sucking the tit of the gov...as it seems that is their personality...

DO AS LITTLE WORK AS POSSIBLE...LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING..

6/12/2015 12:12:49 AM  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (15,162)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007


Quote from higgy51:
Why would a jetliner have blown all the cars off of the highway?

Oh, btw, it DID knock down the light posts.


If a massive jet flew into the PentaCON...at over 500 MPH..the inertia would have taken cars...poles...trees right into the PentaCON with it...

There was no plane at the PentaCON...it was OBVIOUSLY a missle...


Witness's mentioned they only heard a SWOOSHING NOISE...not the big roar of a 747 jet..

===============================================================

Give it up guys....You know what we say is the truth...


Your just paid to be here..and try to cover up this FALSE FLAG DONE ON AMERICAN SOIL..SO ISRA-HELL WONT GET ITS A** BLOWN OFF THE FACE OF THE EARTH..


Prepare..cause the PEOPLE OF THE WORLD..know what happened


THE BIBLE TELLS US THAT THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD..ATTACK..AND DESTROY JERUSALEM AKA BABYLON..The bible teaches that Jerusalem is the HOME OF DEVILS (Revelation 11:8, 17:1, 17:18, 18:10, 18:2-3(home of devils), 18:23-24).

Its in the bible..You outta read it sometime


SINCE 1948..the scriptures in the REVELATION and ZECHARIAH now make sense...keepin in mind there are TWO JERUSALEM'S..one is EARTHLY..called BABYLON....and the other is HEAVENLY..SPIRITUAL JERUSALEM ...where all of Gods REAL people will live ...

THE OT SAINTS ARE ALREADY THERE RIGHT NOW

EZEKIEL 37:12 THE RESURRECTION OF OT SAINTS...REUNIFICATION OF JUDAH AND ISRAEL..DRY BONES
JOHN 4..NO MORE WILL THE FATHER BE WORSHIPED IN JERUSALEM
JOHN 5:25-28 THE RESURRECTION OF THE OT SAINTS PROPHESIED BY JESUS CHRIST
MATTHEW 27:53..THE ACTUAL RESURRECTION OF THE OT SAINTS
HEBREWS 9:27 ITS APPOINTED ONCE FOR MAN TO DIE.
I CORINTHIANS 15:20-26 EACH WILL BE RESURRECTED IN THEIR OWN TIME
REVELATION 14:4..THE FIRST FRUITS FROM MEN..UNTO JESUS AND THE FATHER.


OLD TESTAMENT ISRAEL IS ALREADY IN HEAVEN..

CHRISTIANS ARE THE NEW ISRAEL OF GOD..

GALATIANS 6:16..16And those who will walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.

Galatians 3:7
Understand, then, that those who have faith are children of Abraham.

Galatians 3:29
If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.


JESUS IS THE HEAD OF THE CHURCH
THE CHURCH IS THE "ISRAEL OF GOD"


6/12/2015 12:15:07 AM  
juma2112
Over 4,000 Posts! (4,568)
Wheat Ridge, CO
50, joined Jan. 2011


Quote from srv63:
@

Example: From the looks of the holes in the sides of each trade tower, you would think a military tank got hurled at them at 500 miles per hour. Jetliners tho pretty big,are delicate as hell and no way in hell could have broke thru huge metal beams or even concrete.


Japanese Zero fighter planes were quite fragile as well. Yet there are numerous accounts of them smashing through the armored flight deck of carriers, and their bombs exploding,sometimes 2 or 3 decks below.


6/12/2015 12:28:03 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,102)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from funwithmusic:
Class 5 blocked you because you had him up against the wall...so to try to save face..and avoid answering your questions..HE BLOCKED YOU.


I blocked that douche because I've had enough of his crap. Again I catch you lying. I've answered his questions and he still delayed for two pages, so I thought 'f**k him' his crap isn't worth his shit. He couldn't debunk anything and he has repeatedly been discredited in this thread. How could you miss that?

Please keep up with your own thread so you don't have to resort to childish lies and behaviour to save what little is left of your credibility.



class5 -