WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!

a). NORAD was in a state of confusion if you examine the sources.

b). Your point is a non-sequitur and a Red Herring.

c). Releasing the sensitive material in the NIST report has the potential to show others how to place bombs to achieve the maximum effect.

d). Your basically arguing from incredulity like noprinciples, and that is fallacious.

Lets not forget the MISSING WINGS Na that NEVER were found.

Arguement from incredulity.

More brain dead shill hob-knobbing

No, he was arguing from incredulity like you do and it is fallacious.

More brain dead shill activity.Since NORAD is a f**kin joke, how about we send it and ALL employees to raghead land with the taliban and mount f**kin canons on the rooftops?

This is just a vapid rant.

PLENTY of PROOF exists that a jetliner DID NOT crash in shanksville. HOWEVER, there is ALLOT more proof of a MISSILE.

Yet no-one in 9/11 truth can produce any evidence to support their claims. I don't believe in stories without evidence.

Why do you?

[Edited 6/28/2015 8:05:52 PM ]

6/28/2015 5:53:24 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Instead of idle speculation based upon confirmation bias, let's see what we can actually find out about the cameras. A technical appraisal of the capabilities of the cameras surrounding the Pentagon: http://11-settembre.blogspot.com/2007/02/why-dont-pentagon-videos-clearly-show.html 911 Case Study: Pentagon Flight 77 http://www.mikejwilson.com/911/ On the cameras and the claim that the FBI hid the evidence: http://www.911myths.com/index.php/FBI_hides_84_Pentagon_videos Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
6/28/2015 5:54:27 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: You know........to write some phony a** paper only a bumbling baboon would give any credence too. ================================================ Here at Date Hookup.com------ we have 3 bumbling baboons [ kiddies in a sandbox throwing sand at grown ups when the grown ups tell them wont buy them an ice cream cone ] who keep saying for 14 years now.......show us proof. All 3 have wittle black books that tell them what to say or how to say it to try and debunk the truth. Lots of 1 liners from the baboon down under hoping to get high 5s from the other two baboons. And it's time for our daily trollin' by 57 fruitbats.
6/28/2015 5:57:40 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
57channels Paducah, KY 64, joined May. 2008	If this is the case then why did the FBI confiscate the gas station and hotel security videos within minutes of the crash and why haven't they subsequently released these videos? ======================================================== There they go again. The F B I confiscating evidence that would definitely prove to any 8 year old the real culprits behind the ole false falg attack or inside job or whatever you want to call it. They did it at JFKs assassination, Waco Texas, Oklahoma City, Ruby Ridge, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, and how many more have I missed?? Hey kiddies........what is the FBI doing confiscating " evidence " That is a crime isn't it??
6/28/2015 6:11:04 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: Hey kiddies........what is the FBI doing confiscating " evidence " That is a crime isn't it?? I know you wouldn't understand, but it's a part of the evidence gathering process. If you note the video footage that was applicable was used as evidence in the Moussaoui trial, you may note that this is the result of gathering evidence. You see, a crime or atrocity is committed, and the relevant agency responds; the members of that agency then gather evidence in case a prosecution can be made. So you can now see why the FBI confiscated the cameras. Of course you could attribute some fantastic story to it instead of listening to reason, but there it is. It is simple logic.
6/28/2015 6:13:53 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
57channels Paducah, KY 64, joined May. 2008	Patriots!!!!! We all know the Pentagon has destroyed or locked up the videos or tapes of the missile that hit that building. We call know that. NO FOIA is gonna do any good at all. Now--- we also know that the FBI took away the tapes from the gas station and hotel that would prove a missile hit the Pentagon [ doesnt matter if 10,000 phony witnesses say they saw a jumbo jet or Flight 77 ] What I don't understand is why the F B I hasn't gone to Hollywood and made up some fake plane crashing into the Pentagon. Hell photoshop AA 77 on the fake plane and show some fireball and smoke and shit. Take pics of the Pentagon with smoke and fire and add a fake fkn plane with big #s 77. Maybe that is yet to come huh. Its just pure outright arrogance on the feds part knowing the media will back the 19 Arab faireytale till the police state is fully engulfed. Those poor young kids
6/28/2015 6:17:39 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
57channels Paducah, KY 64, joined May. 2008	class If you note the video footage that was applicable was used as evidence in the Moussaoui trial, you may note that this is the result of gathering evidence. ================================================ I am NOT talking about the fireball the feds released with the wrong date on the video. I want the tapes confiscated by the FBI that shows what HIT the Pentagon....the tapes from the gas station and hotel...those tapes. Dont you want them that the FBI took?? Or you just want to see some fire and smoke. Might as well watch the fireworks in a week then huh???
6/28/2015 6:18:06 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: Patriots!!!!! We all know the Pentagon has destroyed or locked up the videos or tapes of the missile that hit that building. We call know that. No, you don't know that. They have been released. NO FOIA is gonna do any good at all. Now--- we also know that the FBI took away the tapes from the gas station and hotel that would prove a missile hit the Pentagon You 'assume' it would show that. They don't. The rest was just stupid shit not worthy of a response.
6/28/2015 6:19:46 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: I am NOT talking about the fireball the feds released with the wrong date on the video. O course, evidence is immaterial to you. I want the tapes confiscated by the FBI that shows what HIT the Pentagon....the tapes from the gas station and hotel...those tapes. They were released and showed nothing. Dont you want them that the FBI took?? They have been released. Or you just want to see some fire and smoke. Might as well watch the fireworks in a week then huh??? Fool, they have been released and they showed nothing. [Edited 6/28/2015 6:20:01 PM ]
6/28/2015 6:26:58 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
57channels Paducah, KY 64, joined May. 2008	class They were released and showed nothing. ================================================ Oh yeah.....Im sure there's millions worldwide that would like to see them, So lets see them, show us. We all want to see Flight 77 right before it crashes?? Oh wait..you said it shows nothing?? Oh.....IC IC......the tapes in both the hotel and gas station were the wrong kind of tapes huh?? Or was the electricity down at both places. The batteries both dead so they couldn't get a signal or video?? Show us the blank tapes okydoky
6/28/2015 6:38:02 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: class They were released and showed nothing. ================================================ Oh yeah.....Im sure there's millions worldwide that would like to see them, So lets see them, show us. We all want to see Flight 77 right before it crashes?? Oh wait..you said it shows nothing?? Oh.....IC IC......the tapes in both the hotel and gas station were the wrong kind of tapes huh?? Or was the electricity down at both places. The batteries both dead so they couldn't get a signal or video?? Show us the blank tapes okydoky I don't know, and I don't enter into idle speculation like that, it's pointless. Here's a thought, why don't you find out for yourself? I just remember when they were released they were all (apart from the one used in the trial) aimed elsewhere. I'm sure you will read into that whatever you like, but there it is. If I come across a link, I will post it for you, but it's not a priority.
6/28/2015 6:39:34 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Let's see if we can summarise the activity so far: a). The light pole canard has been debunked with no contradictory evidence presented. b). UA 175's fake engine canard has been debunked and it stands as belonging to UA175, with no contradictory evidence presented. c). The existence of UA175 wreckage at the WTC has been confirmed, thus debunking the no-plane fantasy with no contradictory evidence presented. d). The 'missing trillions' canard has been demonstrated to be false with no contradictory evidence presrented. If I've forgotten anything Higgy, please feel free to update this further.
6/28/2015 6:44:52 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
57channels Paducah, KY 64, joined May. 2008	class I just remember when they were released they were all (apart from the one used in the trial) aimed elsewhere. ======================================================= Aimed elsewhere?? What are you talking about ??? Those tapes are there for a purpose to keep a watch on the Pentagon or anyone near that building that shouldn't be near there [ for safety purposes ] and you say the camera's were pointed elsewhere??? Is that what your black book tells you what to say??? Cornered again and this is the best you come up with?? The tapes were released [ pure outright lie ] but aimed elsewhere??
6/28/2015 6:56:05 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: class I just remember when they were released they were all (apart from the one used in the trial) aimed elsewhere. ======================================================= Aimed elsewhere?? What are you talking about ??? Those tapes are there for a purpose to keep a watch on the Pentagon or anyone near that building that shouldn't be near there [ for safety purposes ] and you say the camera's were pointed elsewhere??? Is that what your black book tells you what to say??? Cornered again and this is the best you come up with?? The tapes were released [ pure outright lie ] but aimed elsewhere?? If you opened the article I posted earlier you would know why. I'll post it again for you as you must have missed it: http://11-settembre.blogspot.com.au/2007/02/why-dont-pentagon-videos-clearly-show.html The 85 tapes were released some time ago and were found to be lacking in relevant imagery. When I find it again I'll post it for you, but I'm not running around for you to just dismiss it without evidence as is your usual method. I doubt you'd even look at it before you dismissed it, as logic and reason are not attributes that one finds in your posts.
6/28/2015 7:00:18 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: Patriots!!!!! We all know the Pentagon has destroyed or locked up the videos or tapes of the missile that hit that building. We call know that. NO FOIA is gonna do any good at all. Now--- we also know that the FBI took away the tapes from the gas station and hotel that would prove a missile hit the Pentagon [ doesnt matter if 10,000 phony witnesses say they saw a jumbo jet or Flight 77 ] Of course the evidence doesn't matter to you. You repeatedly demonstrate that. What I don't understand is why the F B I hasn't gone to Hollywood and made up some fake plane crashing into the Pentagon. Hell photoshop AA 77 on the fake plane and show some fireball and smoke and shit. Take pics of the Pentagon with smoke and fire and add a fake fkn plane with big #s 77. Wow, that is some stupid shit right there. Maybe that is yet to come huh. Its just pure outright arrogance on the feds part knowing the media will back the 19 Arab faireytale till the police state is fully engulfed. Those poor young kids And here we have a typical example of the reasoning processes behind those who follow 9/11 truth. Just more wild and crazy claims with no supporting evidence (as usual) based purely on ignorance, and these clowns get the shits when we don't believe their flawed reasoning? Give me a break! [Edited 6/28/2015 7:02:57 PM ]
6/28/2015 7:07:01 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: That arsehole blocks one, then trolls. He is such a wanker. Does another wanker come to mind?
6/28/2015 7:10:18 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: For the umpteenth time you have to demonstrate it actually is rust. I'm not arguing a point that has yet to be demonstrated. Now get on with it and stop stalling. I'm not going to respond to any of your bullshit until you've done that. If you want proof that it's not rust, then you best get on the ball with your handlers and get that military fuselage tested, don't ya think? Until you PROVE it's not rust then it IS RUST!
6/28/2015 7:24:17 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: If you want proof that it's not rust, then you best get on the ball with your handlers and get that military fuselage tested, don't ya think? Until you PROVE it's not rust then it IS RUST! I don't have the burden of proof, you do, and you always conveniently forget that fact. Now, get to it, because I'm not interested in your evasions and weak excuses. Your feeble interpretation of a pic means absolutely nothing to me or anyone else that matters, and if you claim the part is rusty, the burden is on you to prove it, not me or anyone else. Get to it and stop wasting my time with your delaying tactics.
6/28/2015 7:28:33 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Let's see if we can summarise the activity so far: a). The light pole canard has been debunked with no contradictory evidence presented. b). UA 175's fake engine canard has been debunked and it stands as belonging to UA175, with no contradictory evidence presented. c). The existence of UA175 wreckage at the WTC has been confirmed, thus debunking the no-plane fantasy with no contradictory evidence presented. d). The 'missing trillions' canard has been demonstrated to be false with no contradictory evidence presented. [Edited 6/28/2015 7:30:14 PM ]
6/28/2015 7:36:29 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: Quote from naprinciple: I don't believe the Pentagon could be hit by a plane without being caught on film, from dozens of angles. Argument from incredulity. I don't believe releasing NIST's modeling data would endanger public safety. That's just borne of ignorance. You need to give that a lot more thought before you make such a pronouncement. I would have to agree with Naprinciple on that one. Our own shitty assed self proclaimed defense NORAD either FKED UP or PURPOSELY lets (supposedly) 4 jetliners get hijacked and run into whatever the hell they want to and some FKING MORON is going to claim that the NIST reports might damage security? ARE YOU FKING KIDDING ME? SEND THE WHOLE FKING NIST TO RAGHEAD LAND AND I BET THEM CAMEL FKERS STILL COULDNT PULL OFF ANOTHER 9/11 AND ONLY A RETARD WOULD DISAGREE!!!!! I don't believe terrorists would make a 270 degree corkscrew turn, avoiding the top brass, but hitting the wing where accountants were auditing DOD malfeasance. Mere rhetoric. Lets not forget the MISSING WINGS Na that NEVER were found. I don't believe that 911 and the PNAC report to be coincidental. Incredulity. More brain dead shill hob-knobbing I don't believe terrorists were capable of avoiding fighter jet interceptors without inside help. They didn't have to. A moronic claim. More brain dead shill activity.Since NORAD is a fkin joke, how about we send it and ALL employees to raghead land with the taliban and mount fkin canons on the rooftops? I don't believe a plane crashed in Shanksville, shot down is more likely. No proof exists to support such a claim: confirmation bias. PLENTY of PROOF exists that a jetliner DID NOT crash in shanksville. HOWEVER, there is ALLOT more proof of a MISSILE. I don't believe cell calls were made from planes at cruising altitude. Argument from incredulity & confirmation bias. Technology in cellphone transmission at that time was a joke, therefore impossible but you can't convince a gooberment paid shill. Well that was one post containing nothing but fallacious reasoning based upon poor logic and sources. You know, i could say the exact about the shills response**
6/28/2015 7:38:05 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: You know, i could say the exact about the shills response I'm sure you could, but that doesn't mean shit. All of your response above are just garbage with no evidence. How's that evidence for rust coming along Douche?
6/28/2015 7:52:33 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: Let's see if we can summarise the activity so far: a). The light pole canard has been debunked with no contradictory evidence presented. b). UA 175's fake engine canard has been debunked and it stands as belonging to UA175, with no contradictory evidence presented. c). The existence of UA175 wreckage at the WTC has been confirmed, thus debunking the no-plane fantasy with no contradictory evidence presented. d). The 'missing trillions' canard has been demonstrated to be false with no contradictory evidence presented. Ummmm shill, i think EVERY piece of fantasy evidence you and your shill buddies have presented have been rationally and SUCCESSFULLY contradicted to a high enough level to put serious doubt in the minds of ordinary, everday individuals to the governments official story and to the point of demanding truth. Because of this, you shills lose therefore you best be keeping your side job flipping burgers
6/28/2015 7:54:57 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
57channels Paducah, KY 64, joined May. 2008	class "A Pentagon spokesperson tells Popular Mechanics that the video was taken with a Philips LTC 1261 security camera and recorded at one frame per second. Jerry Housenga is a technical product specialist with Bosch Security Systems, which bought the Philips camera division in 2002. According to Housenga, it was unrealistic to think that the low-quality security camera footage would reveal the crystal-clear image of a Boeing 757 traveling at 780 feet per second. While most advanced security and surveillance cameras can be set to capture real-time video, the attached recording systems are almost always set at significantly slower frame rates in order to conserve storage space. As a result, it is unlikely that the recording system of any nearby security camera would be set at a rate high enough to capture the speeding plane with decent resolution." . As reported by Popular Mechanics, therefore, the aircraft was flying at approximately 780 feet per second, which is 237.9 meters per second or 858 kilometers per hour. The Pentagon security cameras that took the videos used the NTSC standard and accordingly generated 29.97 frames per second in 60i mode, i.e., by capturing 60 fields per second (each frame of a television picture consists of two fields). Based on what data is publicly available and unless evidence to the contrary emerges, these cameras were therefore stationary analog interlaced models which used the NTSC standard. For the technical analysis that follows, I'd like to clarify that I consulted many technical sources and discussed the matter with technicians who have worked in the field of audiovisual production for years and with CCTV and video production/transmission specialists. However, I would advise anyone not to trust my assessments blindly and to check my arguments personally. =========================================== Gee, how did I know that Popular Mechanics was in bed with a Pentagon spokesperson???? Listen up: Flight 77 never flew that day. It never took off, just like Flight 11 never took off. IF any plane hit the Pentagon....we would be seeing a blurry pic of it. Yeah right......Popular Mechanics knows how fast bthe alleged plane was traveling yeah right?? Sure they do....even though it was a f**king missile.
6/28/2015 7:56:06 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: I'm sure you could, but that doesn't mean shit. All of your response above are just garbage with no evidence. How's that evidence for rust coming along Douche? Were waiting on your gooberments crew to prove otherwise, creampuff. Keep in mind, when your about to sniff your panties because you think you proved me wrong on the rust, there is proof of rust and i assure you your gonna die choking on your panties. It must really suck always being wrong huh [Edited 6/28/2015 7:59:35 PM ]
6/28/2015 7:58:58 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: Were waiting on your gooberments crew to prove otherwise, creampuff. Well, keep waiting Dropkick, because I'm not bothering as the burden lies with you. I won't waste another post on this and I will block you if you keep this shit up. Grow up and get your shit together if you want to play with the grown ups. It must really suck always being wrong huh I wouldn't know. Tell me about it as you have the necessary experience. [Edited 6/28/2015 7:59:11 PM ]
6/28/2015 8:02:31 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: I would have to agree with Naprinciple on that one. Our own shitty assed self proclaimed defense NORAD either FKED UP or PURPOSELY lets (supposedly) 4 jetliners get hijacked and run into whatever the hell they want to and some FKING MORON is going to claim that the NIST reports might damage security? ARE YOU FKING KIDDING ME? SEND THE WHOLE FKING NIST TO RAGHEAD LAND AND I BET THEM CAMEL F**KERS STILL COULDNT PULL OFF ANOTHER 9/11 AND ONLY A RETARD WOULD DISAGREE!!!!!
6/28/2015 8:07:10 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: Ummmm shill, i think EVERY piece of fantasy evidence you and your shill buddies have presented have been rationally and SUCCESSFULLY contradicted to a high enough level to put serious doubt in the minds of ordinary, everday individuals to the governments official story and to the point of demanding truth. Because of this, you shills lose therefore you best be keeping your side job flipping burgers Well, that was a dumb rant.
6/28/2015 8:11:31 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: I wouldn't know. Tell me about it as you have the necessary experience. Block me creampuff,i assure you life goes on as well as this forum. As stated before, i'm telling you that i'm absolutely certain that the fuselage on top of wtc5 is TIN and RUSTING and it will ALWAYS be TIN until YOU stooges PROVE otherwise. Keep this in mind when you THINK that you might have found a debunk to my CERTAINTY that the fuselage was tin, when your ready to sniff your co-stooges panties with excitement thinking you won this debate, I have SOLID VISUAL PROOF that the fuselage is TIN, something only a 23 year air force sheet metal mechanic would know to look for.Don't choke on your panties
6/28/2015 8:17:44 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from srv63: Were waiting on your gooberments crew to prove otherwise, creampuff. Keep in mind, when your about to sniff your panties because you think you proved me wrong on the rust, there is proof of rust and i assure you your gonna die choking on your panties. It must really suck always being wrong huh You never proved it was rust. Regarding the Pentagon, there were plenty of witnesses on the highways around the Pentagon, in buildings, in the cemetery. There were firemen and EMT personnel who went in and recovered bodies. There were scientists and engineers who did reports on the buildings performance. There were people who cleaned up the site so they could rebuild that part of the pentagon. None of these people, including the victims who survived, have come forward and claimed that there were no bodies, no plane parts, or no jet fuel, etc.
6/28/2015 8:22:23 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
progrocknic Mount Arlington, NJ 31, joined Dec. 2012 online now!	Quote from srv63: Block me creampuff,i assure you life goes on as well as this forum. As stated before, i'm telling you that i'm absolutely certain that the fuselage on top of wtc5 is TIN and RUSTING and it will ALWAYS be TIN until YOU stooges PROVE otherwise. Keep this in mind when you THINK that you might have found a debunk to my CERTAINTY that the fuselage was tin, when your ready to sniff your co-stooges panties with excitement thinking you won this debate, I have SOLID VISUAL PROOF that the fuselage is TIN, something only a 23 year air force sheet metal mechanic would know to look for.Don't choke on your panties That's right. You just keep watering those plants with Gatorade. It's got electrolytes.
6/28/2015 8:23:07 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: Block me creampuff,i assure you life goes on as well as this forum. As stated before, i'm telling you that i'm absolutely certain that the fuselage on top of wtc5 is TIN and RUSTING and it will ALWAYS be TIN until YOU stooges PROVE otherwise. Keep this in mind when you THINK that you might have found a debunk to my CERTAINTY that the fuselage was tin, when your ready to sniff your co-stooges panties with excitement thinking you won this debate, I have SOLID VISUAL PROOF that the fuselage is TIN, something only a 23 year air force sheet metal mechanic would know to look for.Don't choke on your panties For the last time, you've yet to demonstrate it's rust. I can't even see what you are babbling about, let alone swallow your unsupported extrapolation. Get back to me when you can prove it's rust. Until then, stop harassing me with your stupid rants and dumbass posts. I've got better things to do than read your dumb shit. Get to it or STFU.
6/28/2015 8:24:53 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from progrocknic: That's right. You just keep watering those plants with Gatorade. It's got electrolytes. How thick is this clown when it comes to the burden of proof? F**k me, it's like pulling teeth with these inbreds.
6/28/2015 8:41:22 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from 57channels: If cl--ASS, tragic, or higgy ever met the 9-11 family members and backed up the official lie in person to them face to face...........I bet they would either get lynched by those family members or run like the f**king cowards they are. Paid cowards too--as long as the money keeps coming in to them--they will keep selling out. These 3 could announce an NFL football game, and keep a straight face. I can hear them say " Gosh the defense really rose to the occasion on that play [ when any 10 year old could tell you the qb threw the interception on purpose. ] I would be most willing to join you 57channels in meeting up with those who have lost family members at 911. All you gotta do is say when, and i'll pm you the link.
6/28/2015 8:43:56 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from tragicparrot: I would be most willing to join you 57channels in meeting up with those who have lost family members at 911. All you gotta do is say when, and i'll pm you the link. If I'm in the US when this meeting takes place, I'm up for it as well.
6/28/2015 8:46:12 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from tragicparrot: You never proved it was rust. Regarding the Pentagon, there were plenty of witnesses on the highways around the Pentagon, in buildings, in the cemetery. There were firemen and EMT personnel who went in and recovered bodies. There were scientists and engineers who did reports on the buildings performance. There were people who cleaned up the site so they could rebuild that part of the pentagon. None of these people, including the victims who survived, have come forward and claimed that there were no bodies, no plane parts, or no jet fuel, etc. HALF of your eyewitnesses (convinced they saw the plane come from the east)COUNTERED the other eyewitnesses accounts AND NORAD (claiming they saw it in the path of the light poles) therefore you have nothing. Do i need to post photos of a REAL PLANE CRASH SITE, because if i do it will show the VAST MAJORITY of the dead passengers would be strewn all over the pentagon lawn whereas EMT's and Firemen would not need to go into the missile aftermath. Tell the traitorous jew bastards that you work for that their HOAX on the twin towers could have worked and fooled us but when them lazy, incompetent bastards ASSUMED us to be so gullible and ignorant to believe in Tower 7 coming down without any reason, flight 93 SUPPOSEDLY crashing in shanksville , and a plane SUPPOSEDLY crashing into the pentagon, them jew bastards got TOO GREEDY and f**ked up the CON GAME!!
6/28/2015 8:49:32 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from srv63: HALF of your eyewitnesses (convinced they saw the plane come from the east)COUNTERED the other eyewitnesses accounts AND NORAD (claiming they saw it in the path of the light poles) therefore you have nothing. Do i need to post photos of a REAL PLANE CRASH SITE, because if i do it will show the VAST MAJORITY of the dead passengers would be strewn all over the pentagon lawn whereas EMT's and Firemen would not need to go into the missile aftermath. Tell the traitorous jew bastards that you work for that their HOAX on the twin towers could have worked and fooled us but when them lazy, incompetent bastards ASSUMED us to be so gullible and ignorant to believe in Tower 7 coming down without any reason, flight 93 SUPPOSEDLY crashing in shanksville , and a plane SUPPOSEDLY crashing into the pentagon, them jew bastards got TOO GREEDY and f**ked up the CON GAME!! Please, do post photo's of not only REAL plane crash sites, but especially those similar to crashing into a structure similar to the Pentagon.
6/28/2015 8:52:33 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Sorry, I forgot this...
6/28/2015 8:56:42 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from tragicparrot: Sorry, I forgot this... Yes, we all must finish our posts with the current fashion:
6/28/2015 9:01:23 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63:HALF of your eyewitnesses (convinced they saw the plane come from the east)COUNTERED the other eyewitnesses accounts AND NORAD (claiming they saw it in the path of the light poles) therefore you have nothing. Absolute bullshit! Your figures misrepresent the reality. Note how they discount eyewitness testimony when it comes to the Pentagon, and yet they stand by the supposed infallibility of eyewitness testimony when it comes to hearing explosions. Selectivity noted. Oh, and [Edited 6/28/2015 9:01:37 PM ]
6/28/2015 9:02:01 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
progrocknic Mount Arlington, NJ 31, joined Dec. 2012 online now!	Quote from srv63: HALF of your eyewitnesses (convinced they saw the plane come from the east)COUNTERED the other eyewitnesses accounts AND NORAD (claiming they saw it in the path of the light poles) therefore you have nothing. Do i need to post photos of a REAL PLANE CRASH SITE, because if i do it will show the VAST MAJORITY of the dead passengers would be strewn all over the pentagon lawn whereas EMT's and Firemen would not need to go into the missile aftermath. Tell the traitorous jew bastards that you work for that their HOAX on the twin towers could have worked and fooled us but when them lazy, incompetent bastards ASSUMED us to be so gullible and ignorant to believe in Tower 7 coming down without any reason, flight 93 SUPPOSEDLY crashing in shanksville , and a plane SUPPOSEDLY crashing into the pentagon, them jew bastards got TOO GREEDY and f*ked up the CON GAME!! Right, kick ass. Well, don't want to sound like a dck or nothin', but, ah... it says on your chart that you're f*ked up. Ah, you talk like a fg, and your shit's all retarded. What I'd do, is just like... like... you know, like, you know what I mean, like...
6/28/2015 9:03:13 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from progrocknic: Right, kick ass. Well, don't want to sound like a dck or nothin', but, ah... it says on your chart that you're fked up. Ah, you talk like a fg, and your shit's all retarded. What I'd do, is just like... like... you know, like, you know what I mean, like... LOLOL Oh, and [Edited 6/28/2015 9:03:33 PM ]
6/28/2015 9:16:44 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	I can only imagine whats going to be posted next. But i'm betting it will make for a rather interesting grand finale.
6/28/2015 9:18:25 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Oops...
6/28/2015 9:19:58 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from tragicparrot:I can only imagine whats going to be posted next. But i'm betting it will make for a rather interesting grand finale. It will be a colossal anti-climax in my view. How many pages have we been waiting for 'The Great Debunking'? Far too many for it to have any cred IMV.
6/28/2015 9:26:37 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from 57channels: According to the same document, the Citgo gas station video DOES NOT show flight 77 impacting the pentagon either. (Maguire, page 6, item 15) ===================================================== I wonder if this Maguire person is fking Cheney in the arse or vice versa??? Maybe he just got a few mill from ole Larry [ pull it ] Silverstein huh??? You know........to write some phony a paper only a bumbling baboon would give any credence too. In the meantime, if this isn't an embarrassment to truthers, I don't know what is!
6/28/2015 9:36:28 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	You forgot the
6/28/2015 9:51:55 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: Quote from srv63:HALF of your eyewitnesses (convinced they saw the plane come from the east)COUNTERED the other eyewitnesses accounts AND NORAD (claiming they saw it in the path of the light poles) therefore you have nothing. Absolute bullshit! Your figures misrepresent the reality. Note how they discount eyewitness testimony when it comes to the Pentagon, and yet they stand by the supposed infallibility of eyewitness testimony when it comes to hearing explosions. Selectivity noted. Oh, and ANY and ALL of us would take eyewitness testimony over bullshit lying government anyday as well as video in most cases over eyewitness testimony as long as the video(stringently investigated) as well as the eyewitness testimony(stringently investigated) to be sure without a doubt the most reliable source of information is the basis for the total findings.Instead we have jerkoffs obviously paid gooberment wannabe actors telling us what to believe happened on 9/11 as well as the IDIOTIC lame stream media wasting time with a paid witness shill and selling the same exact story instead of interviewing an ACTUAL EYEWITNESS like Mr. Berry Jennings (notice the caps,means respect) who started to tell his TRUE ORDEALS inside building 7 as bombs are exploding until the fbi(notice no caps, means no respect) rushed Mr.Jennings away to stop talking. Also notice how one of our most key eyewitnesses mysteriously dies 1 DAY before scheduled to give his eyewitness testimony to the 9/11 investigative circle jerk board. Coincidence? NO WAY IN HELL!!! Only a retard paid shill would buy into that bullshit
6/28/2015 9:58:26 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63:ANY and ALL of us would take eyewitness testimony over bullshit lying government anyday as well as video in most cases over eyewitness testimony as long as the video(stringently investigated) as well as the eyewitness testimony(stringently investigated) to be sure without a doubt the most reliable source of information is the basis for the total findings.Instead we have jerkoffs obviously paid gooberment wannabe actors telling us what to believe happened on 9/11 as well as the IDIOTIC lame stream media wasting time with a paid witness shill and selling the same exact story instead of interviewing an ACTUAL EYEWITNESS like Mr. Berry Jennings (notice the caps,means respect) who started to tell his TRUE ORDEALS inside building 7 as bombs are exploding until the fbi(notice no caps, means no respect) rushed Mr.Jennings away to stop talking. Also notice how one of our most key eyewitnesses mysteriously dies 1 DAY before scheduled to give his eyewitness testimony to the 9/11 investigative circle jerk board. Coincidence? NO WAY IN HELL!!! Only a retard paid shill would buy into that bullshit Just another dumb rant with no supporting evidence I didn't read. Dude, I don't care about your confirmation bias. You are posting crap at the moment and it's just word flatulence as far as I'm concerned. Your opinion of anything doesn't interest me in the slightest. I'm interested in facts alone. How's that proof for the rust coming? Oops! I forgot! [Edited 6/28/2015 9:58:49 PM ]
6/28/2015 10:01:03 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from progrocknic: Right, kick ass. Well, don't want to sound like a dck or nothin', but, ah... it says on your chart that you're fked up. Ah, you talk like a fg, and your shit's all retarded. What I'd do, is just like... like... you know, like, you know what I mean, like... Your gonna need to get the neighbors dck out of your mouth linus because i can't understand a damn thing your trying to say. As far as me being gay, i must ask you a question.If i'm correct,your the one that openly shares your wife with whatever hard dck she rather have besides you. If your wife or whatever the hell that is, f*ks your next door neighbor with your blessing and then you go down and lick on that clit, doesn't that technically mean the same as you sucking your neighbors dck? UMMMMM, technically you can't call me a f*g, creampuff [Edited 6/28/2015 10:04:06 PM ]
6/28/2015 10:03:09 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63:Your gonna need to get the neighbors dck out of your mouth linus because i can't understand a damn thing your trying to say. As far as me being gay, i must ask you a question. If your wife or whatever the hell that is, fks your next door neighbor with your blessing and then you go down and lick on that clit, doesn't that technically mean the same as you sucking your neighbors dck? UMMMMM, technically you can't call me a f*g, creampuff The hypocrisy in that rant sticks out like a third testicle on a greyhound.
6/28/2015 10:08:58 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: Quote from srv63:Your gonna need to get the neighbors dck out of your mouth linus because i can't understand a damn thing your trying to say. As far as me being gay, i must ask you a question. If your wife or whatever the hell that is, fks your next door neighbor with your blessing and then you go down and lick on that clit, doesn't that technically mean the same as you sucking your neighbors dck? UMMMMM, technically you can't call me a fg, creampuff The hypocrisy in that rant sticks out like a third testicle on a greyhound. I know noclass that i was supposed to save "creampuff" only for you but at the moment i couldn't help myself and it seemed more fitting for the married gay man that shares his btch at the neighborhood block party. Sorry, it wont happen again, creampuff.
6/28/2015 10:10:57 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63:I know noclass that i was supposed to save "creampuff" only for you but at the moment i couldn't help myself and it seemed more fitting for the married gay man that shares his b*tch at the neighborhood block party. Sorry, it wont happen again, creampuff. And you completely missed the point...hardly surprising when you have such a low IQ. How's that proof of the rust coming? It isn't? I didn't think so.
6/28/2015 10:16:00 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: Quote from srv63:I know noclass that i was supposed to save "creampuff" only for you but at the moment i couldn't help myself and it seemed more fitting for the married gay man that shares his b*tch at the neighborhood block party. Sorry, it wont happen again, creampuff. And you completely missed the point...hardly surprising when you have such a low IQ. How's that proof of the rust coming? It isn't? I didn't think so. If this country bumkin has such a low IQ, what would that be saying for the gooberment stooges that the bumkin is wiping the floor with?
6/28/2015 10:22:34 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from srv63: ANY and ALL of us would take eyewitness testimony over bullshit lying government anyday as well as video in most cases over eyewitness testimony as long as the video(stringently investigated) as well as the eyewitness testimony(stringently investigated) to be sure without a doubt the most reliable source of information is the basis for the total findings. And it is quite apparent you have yet to accept any eyewitness accounts.
6/28/2015 10:24:29 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63:If this country bumkin has such a low IQ, what would that be saying for the gooberment stooges that the bumkin is wiping the floor with? LOLOL. That's priceless! Your delusions are hilarious! a) You failed to prove the engine was a fake and provided no evidence to support your claim. b) You failed to prove UA175's debris is fake and so far have been unable to provide evidence to support your argument. c) You failed on the light poles d) You failed on the missing trillions. 9/11 truth: Failing for 13 years You've been bickering and acting like a brat for pages now. It's about time you got off your fat arse and actually proved some of this bullshit you claim. You know, like they do in the real world. Hey Dipshit, 'bumpkin' has a 'P'.
6/28/2015 10:24:49 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014
6/28/2015 10:27:30 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from tragicparrot: And it is quite apparent you have yet to accept any eyewitness accounts. Yes, i have accepted SOME eyewitness accounts. Did i not say "stringent investigating" of eyewitness accounts? LOTS of so-called eyewitnesses stories don't match facts therefore are gooberment LIARS.
6/28/2015 10:27:35 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from tragicparrot: This site needs a 'like' button.
6/28/2015 10:29:43 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
class5 Queensland Australia 51, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63:Yes, i have accepted SOME eyewitness accounts. Those whose testimony which you can manipulate to suit your needs. Did i not say "stringent investigating" of eyewitness accounts? That's funny. LOTS of so-called eyewitnesses stories don't match facts therefore are gooberment LIARS. Non-Sequitur. Revise logic.
6/28/2015 10:40:45 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from srv63: Yes, i have accepted SOME eyewitness accounts. Did i not say "stringent investigating" of eyewitness accounts? LOTS of so-called eyewitnesses stories don't match facts therefore are gooberment LIARS. For the record, can you please point out which eyewitness accounts don't match the facts surrounding 911?
6/28/2015 10:40:57 PM	WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: Quote from srv63:Yes, i have accepted SOME eyewitness accounts. Those whose testimony which you can manipulate to suit your needs. Did i not say "stringent investigating" of eyewitness accounts? That's funny. LOTS of so-called eyewitnesses stories don't match facts therefore are gooberment LIARS. Non-Sequitur. Revise logic. Look fancy pants with the fancy education, i look at all the facts, data and evidence the exact same way as a juror in a jury. I take EVERYTHING into account and weigh it and with the god given common sense, i decide what is truth and what is fantasy. I am a simple country boy but by no means dumb and i am absolutely positive of the evil that played out on 9/11 involving the government and a bunch of already rich greedy jews. If this snide remark your fellow stooge mentioned about "my chart" means what i think, all i can say is bring it on b*tches!

maegapersonals

mega personales