Unlike some "truthers" who cited a conspiracy even BEFORE the investigations began, I certainly did hold the government to the same standard or burden of proof as anyone else. Something I find most truthers seem to have trouble with. As for whatever it is about the official report that doesn't make sense, please post it instead of beating around the bush with all the short quips.

BTW, Louie doesn't know what "pull it" means.

Higgy, out of all three of you stooges, i thought that you might be the only one with half a brain tho your actions still showed you to be a paid shill.No matter what kind of compelling evidence us truthers come up with that would clearly put your gooberments official story to shame making their version of events impossible, you stooges will back their official story no matter how retarded it makes you therefore i feel like i don't have to prove you idiots wrong because it would be no different than debating with a sack of rocks because that IS the degree of your intelligence.As far as your claim that us truthers being debunked 99%, your a deceitful LIAR . The success rate of debunking the truthers is really about 10% so you and your clown stooges are in fantasy land thinking 99%

Tragicparrot, you say: “BTW, Louie doesn't know what "pull it" means.” Well, Tragic, the professional demolition guy, who had to have been standing by, knew very well what it meant, because as soon as the order was given, and it was an order, the building came crumbling down in free fall onto its own footprint into a pile of dust and rubble, just like the other two buildings did. (And fire chiefs are not qualified or authorized to demolish buildings, they have to bring in qualified professional people for that).

And keep in mind Tragic and Higgy, that the explosives have to have been ALREADY preplaced and ready to go well before the events of 9-11. And the reason for destroying the building was to destroy sensitive documents stored in the building. Don’t you see that this was all preplanned well ahead of time, and that the US government itself had to have been involved?

Face it three kitties, you have lost this argument, you've been blown out of the water. Now it’s time to man up and admit that you were wrong. There is no shame in that. People sometime exhibit poor judgment. But there IS shame in adhering stubbornly to lies in the face of the facts.

Louie

I don't believe the Pentagon could be hit by a plane without being caught on film, from dozens of angles.


I don't believe releasing NIST's modeling data would endanger public safety.


I don't believe terrorists would make a 270 degree corkscrew turn, avoiding the top brass, but hitting the wing where accountants were auditing DOD malfeasance.


I don't believe that 911 and the PNAC report to be coincidental.


I don't believe terrorists were capable of avoiding fighter jet interceptors without inside help.


I don't believe a plane crashed in Shanksville, shot down is more likely.


I don't believe cell calls were made from planes at cruising altitude.





None of these make sense when you think Arabs did it, but make perfect sense if you're willing to suspect our rulers.

Oh good, so YOU DO ADMIT that you have been debunked...you so called Truthers HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED.

Good, that shows the other 90% hasn't been debunked, so what have we yet to debunk srv?


Care to expand just what we do need to debunk yet ...YET?

Please feel free to make a list of claims that you say we have not debunked or have not been debunked...let us see this list of yours.

At parrot,

As far as your comment of:

"As for some of the other question i.e., why no Pentagon plane videos (due to video speed) or NIST denies access to modeling data (A guess would be that the information contains weaknesses in existing structures making future terror attacks easier should they receive the information) etc, you'll just have to wait as my current priorities are not set to repeatedly go over the same ole BS."

Even you payed shills know damn well that any NORAD, NIST intel as well as any photos the gooberment refuses to share with us is just more evidence PROVING they are lying scumbags and the WHOLE WORLD knows it. I hope you shills kids futures are brighter than yours

The 10% that got debunked , i was in no way referring to the truthers on this dating site because you shills have not debunked a single thing, NOT ONE. As far as you needing something else to debunk, explain the rusted fuselage from a military aircraft on the roof of wtc5 GENIUS

Guess what f**ktard, that RUST on that fuselage on the roof of wtc5 is RUST until you f**ktards prove otherwise or else your handlers prove to me it's not RUST. You f**kin morons, i have seen enough RUST in my life and KNOW DAMN WELL WHAT RUST LOOKS LIKE so until you prove otherwise, that shit on that fuselage is RUST!!!!! Try debunking me on that RUST then I WILL BURY YOUR ASSES!!!!!

Tragicparrot, you say: “BTW, Louie doesn't know what "pull it" means.” Well, Tragic, the professional demolition guy, who had to have been standing by, knew very well what it meant, because as soon as the order was given, and it was an order, the building came crumbling down in free fall onto its own footprint into a pile of dust and rubble, just like the other two buildings did. (And fire chiefs are not qualified or authorized to demolish buildings, they have to bring in qualified professional people for that).

And keep in mind Tragic and Higgy, that the explosives have to have been ALREADY preplaced and ready to go well before the events of 9-11. And the reason for destroying the building was to destroy sensitive documents stored in the building. Don’t you see that this was all preplanned well ahead of time, and that the US government itself had to have been involved?

Face it three kitties, you have lost this argument, you've been blown out of the water. Now it’s time to man up and admit that you were wrong. There is no shame in that. People sometime exhibit poor judgment. But there IS shame in adhering stubbornly to lies in the face of the facts.

Louie

Wow, MR ANGRY!!

Your post made me laugh so hard with all the immature name calling and even bringing my children into it, now that is lowest of the low.

So, MR ANGRY, what about this list?

I grant you MR ANGRY, the shanksville gash is not shown onn ONE photo, but then again, why should it be? Anyone with even a miniscule brain like yours will be able to understand by looking at the terrain, the road and the two gashes that they are different, but even YOU cannot seem to understand that.

Now MR ANGRY, the list of other stuff that needs debunking? the other 90%?

Oh, the taxi drivers wife is NOT part of the janitorial crew and you have the proof? Yes pelase, I would love to see your proof of this.

And if you all did your homework you would find out that the cops and EMS were aware of the killings down in South Carolina last week about 20 minutes before they even happened. There has been proof of that put out on the internet.

.

Excellent post above, full of logic which, sadly, will be so wasted on the 4 CT Nutcases.

As far as your UA175, i think i brought up a VERY GOOD subject worth debate on your rusting fuselage but i notice ALL of you shills are side stepping and running from it. Care to PROVE to me that it's NOT RUST on that fuselage or better yet, care to give me a better explanation of what it is on that fuselage besides RUST? Don't even waste our time here saying it's rust colored dust or fine debris again because that shit will not float. The proof is in the pudding boys

Shill type behavior

So........what happens now with tragic's response to my question?????

He is searching in his little black book entitled " Debunking the truth about 9-11 " and he is busy reading what to say and how to mrespond or change the subject or whatever. Aye mate......he will say they already have a pic of some explosion with the wrong date on the pic.

THATS NOT WHAT IM ASKING " I WANT TO SEE ALL THE PICS OF FLIGHT 77 IN THE AIR HEADING TOWARDS THE PENTAGON ""

I WANT TO SEE ALL THE PICS OF FLIGHT 77 IN THE AIR HEADING TOWARDS THE PENTAGON ""

I WANT TO SEE ALL THE PICS OF FLIGHT 77 IN THE AIR HEADING TOWARDS THE PENTAGON ""

I WANT TO SEE ALL THE PICS OF FLIGHT 77 IN THE AIR HEADING TOWARDS THE PENTAGON ""

I WANT TO SEE ALL THE PICS OF FLIGHT 77 IN THE AIR HEADING TOWARDS THE PENTAGON ""

I WANT TO SEE ALL THE PICS OF FLIGHT 77 IN THE AIR HEADING TOWARDS THE PENTAGON ""

I can't understand you with your head that far up your own ass.

(57channels asks >question: Now with all those camera's why don't we the people see the incoming plane [ Flight 77 ] in the air come crashing into the Pentagon over and over again like we see the alleged plane hit the south tower every anniversary of 9-11??)

Answer. Because enough "we the people" witnesses were present when the plane hit.

Plenty of video's exist showing jetliners striking the WTC's. Do you have something to substantiate that a "black or grey military plane" hit the WTC's?

Good comeback junior

As far as your UA175, i think i brought up a VERY GOOD subject worth debate on your rusting fuselage but i notice ALL of you shills are side stepping and running from it. Care to PROVE to me that it's NOT RUST on that fuselage or better yet, care to give me a better explanation of what it is on that fuselage besides RUST? Don't even waste our time here saying it's rust colored dust or fine debris again because that shit will not float. The proof is in the pudding boys

I don't believe the Pentagon could be hit by a plane without being caught on film, from dozens of angles.

I don't believe releasing NIST's modeling data would endanger public safety.

I don't believe terrorists would make a 270 degree corkscrew turn, avoiding the top brass, but hitting the wing where accountants were auditing DOD malfeasance.

I don't believe that 911 and the PNAC report to be coincidental.

I don't believe terrorists were capable of avoiding fighter jet interceptors without inside help.

I don't believe a plane crashed in Shanksville, shot down is more likely.

I don't believe cell calls were made from planes at cruising altitude.

"His gas station, open only to Department of Defense personnel, is the last structure between the Pentagon and the hillside that, hours later, would become a wailing knoll. "By the time I got outside all I could see was a giant cloud of smoke, first white then black, coming from the Pentagon," he said. "It was just a terrible, terrible thing to be so close to."
"Velasquez says the gas station's security cameras are close enough to the Pentagon to have recorded the moment of impact. "I've never seen what the pictures looked like," he said. "The FBI was here within minutes and took the film."

The second business was initially believed to be the Sheraton National Hotel which overlooks I395 and the Pentagon. Initial reports pointed out that hotel staff had sat watching the video surveillance in horror before the FBI arrived and shut down the scene.

However, according to FBI statements in response to the FOIA request from Mr Bingham, The hotel in question was not the Sheraton but was in fact the Doubletree in Arlington, VA. AND this video did not capture the impact of the flight. (Maguire, page 7)

According to the same document, the Citgo gas station video DOES NOT show flight 77 impacting the pentagon either. (Maguire, page 6, item 15)

If this is the case then why did the FBI confiscate the gas station and hotel security videos within minutes of the crash and why haven't they subsequently released these videos?

http://www.infowars.net/articles/may2006/170506Pentagon_videos.htm