That's because you lack understanding of the subject. You barge in lobbing accusations and lies willy-nilly without evwe3n knowing how the discussion is progressing.
YOUR FOR RIGHTS OF SANDY HOOK LIARS..BUT OPPOSE RIGHTS FOR TRUE VICTIMS OF WTC..
GEESSH...You sway one way..then another cause your house is built on sand..you wave back and forth with the waves...You have no foundation.
See above for the illogical nature of your Red Herring.
You have no idea of we're talking about do you? You're off on another planet with this stupidity.
Thermite has NOT been proven-that is a bald lie. And you cannot demonstrate that it has been proven, but funnily enough, I have shown that it hasn't been proven and you just pretend it doesn't exist like a little child.
9/11 truth-spreading lies and libel for almost 13 years.
[Edited 6/24/2015 5:17:50 PM ]
6/22/2015 5:01:17 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I'm no shill. I just have the ability took look past y bias to the evidence that actually exists. Something truthers will never do. I hate and distrust the government as much as you. I don't let if influence my critical thinking skills though.
Noprinciples lacks any skills in logic and reasoning. He is not worth responding to.
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
6/22/2015 5:02:40 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Completely tore their engine argument apart!
I know and it only took a couple of minutes, however, these clowns won't even acknowledge it and they will pretend it's not even there.
|
6/22/2015 5:10:46 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Einstein couldn't have said it any better.
Einstein would not have made noprinciple's vacuous assumption. Einstein was gifted in logic, noprinciples isn't.
Reason equals common sense too I'm sure.
My God! Are you actually coming out of your brain dead fog? Welcome to the human race!
I should probly leave this thread...
That would be a good idea as you've contributed absolutely nothing in the way of facts or evidence.
|
6/22/2015 6:19:30 PM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
Noprinciples lacks any skills in logic and reasoning. He is not worth responding to.
I wonder if he realizes saying this, "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with.?" is incredibly ironic and self descriptive.
|
6/22/2015 6:24:20 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I wonder if he realizes saying this, "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with.?" is incredibly ironic and self descriptive.
I noticed the irony too. I love that comment in light of the vast amount of evidence I've provided on this thread, while 9/11 truth has provided very little, if any supporting evidence for their canards. Noprinciples is a being motivated purely by bias, not reason.
|
6/22/2015 6:32:38 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I wonder if he realizes saying this, "Reason and evidence can't change ones opinion on a topic if their belief wasn't based on reason and evidence to start with.?" is incredibly ironic and self descriptive.
It's quite telling that they apply stringent standards to their opposition and completely overlook the mendacity of their compatriots.
I suppose you've noticed that one as well?
|
6/22/2015 6:36:40 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Anyway, to avoid it getting buried, would anyone care to comment?
A video still shot taken from the Millennium Hotel showing wreckage of the aircraft on the roof of WTC5 before the collapse of WTC1 (the second to fall). The following pics confirm the plane was UA 175:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbbUFhqmP-k
Now in this frame the fuselage piece is just out of shot (see the red arrow).
Here is where it was found in the wreckage of WTC5 (see arrow):
This is the piece recovered (in red):
In Situ:
Note the letter 'N', and approx. half the numeral '6'.
There can be no doubt that this piece came from UA 175.
|
6/22/2015 6:37:54 PM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
It's quite telling that they apply stringent standards to their opposition and completely overlook the mendacity of their compatriots.
I suppose you've noticed that one as well?
Indeed. Far to confident in their willful ignorance. The facts and evidence are plentiful.
I'm still waiting to hear one plausible alternate theory as to what happened. I'm more than willing to listen. Something like the government hiring pilots to play terrorists. That's plausible. No need for a giant cover up. Just a few people would have to stay silent and then die for their country. And all of the facts and evidence would match.
But no. Truthers have no coherent story. Every one of them thinks something different happened. The motivation begind their views are always the same though. Distrust of government.
|
6/22/2015 6:50:58 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Indeed. Far to confident in their willful ignorance. The facts and evidence are plentiful.
I'm still waiting to hear one plausible alternate theory as to what happened. I'm more than willing to listen. Something like the government hiring pilots to play terrorists. That's plausible. No need for a giant cover up. Just a few people would have to stay silent and then die for their country. And all of the facts and evidence would match.
But no. Truthers have no coherent story. Every one of them thinks something different happened. The motivation begind their views are always the same though. Distrust of government.
Yes, and we all mistrust the government despite the rhetoric they spew all over the internet. It's just that some have a higher level of thinking and can interpret the evidence somewhat objectively.
The Controlled demolition notion has no basis in logic and practicality, nor is the cited motivation necessary. The bombing of the Cole was all the impetus needed to address the AQ situation. No-one needed to employ the elaborate and illogical hoax as proposed by 9/11 truth.
No-planes....well....that one is only surpassed in stupidity by the nuke story.
The fact of the matter is that 9/11 truth cannot produce the evidence required to build a prima facie case for a new investigation, it's that simple and after 13 years, I doubt they ever will.
[Edited 6/22/2015 6:53:19 PM ]
|
6/22/2015 6:54:51 PM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
Apparently the government needed to stage an elaborate hoax to justify going to war in Afghanistan, but the letters WMD were more than enough to go to war in Iraq. Lol. People.
|
6/22/2015 6:57:40 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Apparently the government needed to stage an elaborate hoax to justify going to war in Afghanistan, but the letters WMD were more than enough to go to war in Iraq. Lol. People.
I have no problem with the Coalition invading Afghanistan to smash AQ, but I did have a problem with the WMD story. If Hans Blix didn't buy it, then I didn't buy it, after all, he was only the UN weapons inspector.
|
6/23/2015 1:06:18 AM |
|
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
I should probly leave this thread...:
Didn't realize that you were still posting.
Anything you have posted in the past have been debunked over and over again, you must be getting tired and embarrassed by the number of times you've been debunked.
Even srv appears to have slinked away.
Anyway, off you go and thanks for the laughs you have given me (and us) about your wonderful logical approach to 9/11...and please do take the time while you are away to read and research and maybe finally UNDERSTAND that a hologram CANNOT be seen in broad daylight.
|
6/23/2015 1:17:21 AM |
|
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
As i had mentioned in the post, the purpose of that photo was to give everyone an aerial view of the path that the engine would have to travel knobhead. ALLOT of the reason the gooberment got away with this hoax for so damn long was because of our inability of being able to examine the facts. Examples are no areal views like what i had posted, shitty to say the least photos of crash sites and if that's not bad enough, the photos are dark or blurry as hell or taken with a shit quality throw away camera. We are not fools you shill. We might have been fooled on that day of 9/11 and months forward but we have woken up and now your screwed if you think you will fool us anymore.
Hey SRV?
Any chance of addressing THIS? Or does it worry you that you have AGAIN been debunked and screwed up by your own CT nutcases? Seems to happen quite a lot to you doesn't it?
9/11 truth seem to have a problem with the geography (how surprising).
"The "planting of the engine" conclusion was reached partly due to the fact of where they thought the engine supposedly came to rest.
The information they were reading/using explained that the path the engine took had it being ejected out of the tower, striking and partially damaging the facing/top of a building on east side of Church street, and then landing under scaffolding on the southeast corner of Church and Murray. This was impossible they said because the scaffolding it landed under (east side of Church street) was against the face of the building it partially damaged (east side of Church street) and didn't damage or pass through the top of the scaffolding. That it would have to have hit the ground and rolled backwards like a Titleist golf ball to land beneath the scaffolding.
Turns out, looking north from the intersection of Church and Murray, they had the engine on the southeast corner when it was actually on the northeast corner where the engine came to rest."-Gamalon on ISF (reprinted with permission)
Incorrect corner (looking west down Murray street):
|
6/23/2015 2:22:54 AM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
The NTSB animation of the data taken from AA77's FDR, from take-off to impact:
https://youtu.be/3vqDDlS9Hyw
|
6/23/2015 3:04:05 AM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Didn't realize that you were still posting.
He and Fun have been quiet lately. I'll bet you US$50 she is off pouring over news footage of the Church shooting in order to make it into a false flag story.
The next thread she starts...
|
6/23/2015 6:11:17 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
I noticed the irony too. I love that comment in light of the vast amount of evidence I've provided on this thread, while 9/11 truth has provided very little, if any supporting evidence for their canards. Noprinciples is a being motivated purely by bias, not reason.
UHHHH creampuff, the pic of the fuselage (supposedly) from flight 175,that was planted on the roof of wtc5, the letter N above one of the windows that you are over emphasizing that supposedly proves that that chunk of fuselage is from flight 175, could you please explain to this dumb countryboy why the left bar of the "N" and the right bar of the "N" are not joined by a "\" bar? After your done explaining that, explain to me why the whole area around your (misinterpreted) "N" is still protected by paint but the rest of that fuselages paint is worn off to the degree of parts of it rusting?
|
6/23/2015 6:15:27 PM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
UHHHH creampuff, the pic of the fuselage (supposedly) from flight 175,that was planted on the roof of wtc5, the letter N above one of the windows that you are over emphasizing that supposedly proves that that chunk of fuselage is from flight 175, could you please explain to this dumb countryboy why the left bar of the "N" and the right bar of the "N" are not joined by a "\" bar? After your done explaining that, explain to me why the whole area around your (misinterpreted) "N" is still protected by paint but the rest of that fuselages paint is worn off to the degree of parts of it rusting?
Godzilla. He is the reason the towers collapsed.
|
6/23/2015 6:18:13 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
UHHHH creampuff, the pic of the fuselage (supposedly) from flight 175,that was planted on the roof of wtc5, the letter N above one of the windows that you are over emphasizing that supposedly proves that that chunk of fuselage is from flight 175, could you please explain to this dumb countryboy why the left bar of the "N" and the right bar of the "N" are not joined by a "\" bar? After your done explaining that, explain to me why the whole area around your (misinterpreted) "N" is still protected by paint but the rest of that fuselages paint is worn off to the degree of parts of it rusting?
Seriously? Is that bullshit the best you can come up with?
Prove it was planted; prove the parts are NOT from UA175 or f**k off.
It's that simple retard.
[Edited 6/23/2015 6:20:22 PM ]
|
6/23/2015 6:21:03 PM |
|
|
tragicparrot
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014
|
UHHHH creampuff, the pic of the fuselage (supposedly) from flight 175,that was planted on the roof of wtc5, the letter N above one of the windows that you are over emphasizing that supposedly proves that that chunk of fuselage is from flight 175, could you please explain to this dumb countryboy why the left bar of the "N" and the right bar of the "N" are not joined by a "\" bar? After your done explaining that, explain to me why the whole area around your (misinterpreted) "N" is still protected by paint but the rest of that fuselages paint is worn off to the degree of parts of it rusting?
Uhhh, daisy cakes, that's not rust, its from being burnt. Looks that way because your gooberment or Godzilla planted a huge fireball up in the towers.
|
6/23/2015 6:24:00 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Uhhh, daisy cakes, that's not rust, its from being burnt. Looks that way because your gooberment or Godzilla planted a huge fireball up in the towers.
I must say that would have to be his dumbest reply yet.
|
6/23/2015 6:27:44 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Uhhh, daisy cakes, that's not rust, its from being burnt. Looks that way because your gooberment or Godzilla planted a huge fireball up in the towers.
He conveniently forgets that WTC1 collapsed on the area in question.
|
6/23/2015 6:30:38 PM |
|
|
tragicparrot
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014
|
I must say that would have to be his dumbest reply yet.
Does this mean I get the "stundie" award?
|
6/23/2015 6:32:36 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Does this mean I get the "stundie" award?
No, sorry, you don't qualify, you have a good brain and you can use it. But maybe his post is worthy of a nomination.
|
6/23/2015 6:53:28 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
the pic of the fuselage (supposedly) from flight 175,that was planted on the roof of wtc5,
Unsustantiated claim. Invalid.
the letter N above one of the windows that you are over emphasizing that supposedly proves that that chunk of fuselage is from flight 175, could you please explain to this dumb countryboy why the left bar of the "N" and the right bar of the "N" are not joined by a "\" bar?
Do you need glasses? What you can see are these two bars: \| the remaining | is folded underneath. Note how the metal curves around on itself to the left. It's pretty easy if you take off your 'bias' glasses.
After your done explaining that, explain to me why the whole area around your (misinterpreted) "N" is still protected by paint but the rest of that fuselages paint is worn off to the degree of parts of it rusting?
There are burnt areas, scrapes and one small area of rust. Fire accelerates the corrosion process, as was noticed on the cars on the street the day after. The rest of the marks are burns and wear. You have to remember this was on the roof of 5WTC, therefore 1WTC had previously collapsed upon it. It is strange that you expect it to be unscathed.
It is probably a good idea if you sign on to some elementary science and logic subjects. Surely they have adult education your part of the world.
In your zeal to have a 'gotcha' moment, you completely overlooked any rational explanations.
The mark of a poor thinker.
|
6/23/2015 7:05:08 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Do you need glasses? What you can see are these two bars: \| the remaining | is folded underneath. Note how the metal curves around on itself to the left. It's pretty easy if you take off your 'bias' glasses.
Note also the lower left part of the 'N' is torn away.
[Edited 6/23/2015 7:06:29 PM ]
|
6/23/2015 7:05:10 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Seriously? Is that bullshit the best you can come up with?
Prove it was planted; prove the parts are NOT from UA175 or f**k off.
It's that simple retard.
Creampuff, i really don't want to hurt your feelings here but look at the closep of the planted fuselage on the roof of wtc5. I find it to be a hell of a coincidence that the whole area immediately around the painted on n6 on the fuselage is barely scratched up with a 0 amount of rust ,and the color is a primer gray (tho it's supposed to be a gray/blue), but yet the rest of that fuselage looks like its been sitting in a junkyard for the past 15 years and is rusting.Look real close at the rusting part of the fuselage especially around the bottoms of the windows, can you not see the discoloration of weather streaks going down the sides of that fuselage exactly the same you would find on rusted out cars that have been setting still and decaying in a junk yard for 15 years without being washed.
Another point to bring up. I thought flight 175 had an aluminum fuselage. Since when does aluminum rust? Don't even claim the rust is due to extreme heat because i have welded aluminum before and it does NOT rust.
[Edited 6/23/2015 7:06:37 PM ]
|
6/23/2015 7:12:10 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I find it to be a hell of a coincidence that the whole area immediately around the painted on n6 on the fuselage is barely scratched up with a 0 amount of rust ,and the color is a primer gray (tho it's supposed to be a gray/blue), but yet the rest of that fuselage looks like its been sitting in a junkyard for the past 15 years and is rusting.
a) Argument from incredulity-invalid
b) The colour is not primer grey (glasses? It's Paynes Grey or Blue Grey in the colour process, but that may not be authentic owing to the development process). It matches the shot of the intact plane.
Look real close at the rusting part of the fuselage especially around the bottoms of the windows, can you not see the discoloration of weather streaks going down the sides of that fuselage exactly the same you would find on rusted out cars that have been setting still and decaying in a junk yard for 15 years without being washed.
Heat accelebrates the corrosive process. As I stated earlier, the same effect was noted on the cars on the street.
Another point to bring up. I thought flight 175 had an aluminum fuselage. Since when does aluminum rust?
Seriously? You're not a thinker are you? How do you know it was the aluminium and not some other debris.
Don't even claim the rust is due to extreme heat because i have welded aluminum before and it does NOT rust.
No dipshit, aluminium, does not rust and no-one would make such a stupid claim. try thinking fool.
Your argument is tenuous at best. So have you the proof it was planted yet?
Where is this rust?
Methinks you're grasping at straws.
[Edited 6/23/2015 7:13:49 PM ]
|
6/23/2015 7:50:14 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
To ALL readers ,
Look at the photo that our debunker class5 has graciously posted on the previous page of the intire fuselage supposedly from flight 75.Notice from a distance it appears the same, even in color and looks like it came from a recently crashed aircraft. Now look at the closer view of the fuselage and you actually notice the weather beaten looks of it, very faded paint even to the point of rusting in some areas. Now notice the most recent zoomed in photo of the area where the planes I.D. numbers are above the farthest left window.
Just for the hell of it, let's say the area around where the planes I.D. numbers are, was as weather beaten and rusted like the rest of the fuselage and i wanted to convince you that the fuselage was from flight 175. If i had a cheap can of gray primer and a roll of masking tape, i bet i could paint a "N and part of a 6" within 30 minutes, even painting over the rust. Now look at that zoomed in photo of the "N6" on that fuselage and tell me if it don't look like a shitty looking paint job over rust and other imperfections
|
6/23/2015 7:58:58 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
@ CrEaMpUff,
I don't have to prove that fuselage was planted, all i have to do is prove it's not from flight 175 and so far ummmmmmmm, i think i'm doing it
|
6/23/2015 8:19:17 PM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
@ CrEaMpUff,
I don't have to prove that fuselage was planted, all i have to do is prove it's not from flight 175 and so far ummmmmmmm, i think i'm doing it
In your own mind, anything is possible. In the real world things are different. You should join the rest of us.
|
6/23/2015 8:49:58 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
In your own mind, anything is possible. In the real world things are different. You should join the rest of us.
In your mind, your a man with common sense but in reality, your less of a man who has no clue how to think for himself and maybe that's why you have to share your wife. Just my dumb 2 cents
|
6/23/2015 8:51:42 PM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
Just my dumb 2 cents
Yup.
|
6/23/2015 9:27:47 PM |
|
|
tragicparrot
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014
|
@ CrEaMpUff,
I don't have to prove that fuselage was planted, all i have to do is prove it's not from flight 175 and so far ummmmmmmm, i think i'm doing it
And you've been proving this how? By claiming there's rust where there isn't? You know, if name calling and personal attacks is your way of proving anything, then you really are a dumb country boy.
|
6/23/2015 9:37:21 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Looky here 57channels. I found this way back on page 16.
Please show proof where Rumsfeld, or anyone else for that matter, stated 2.3 trillion is missing.
An excerpt from Rumsfeld's Dept of Defense speech, part of which twoofers like to leave out so's they can go ape shit...
"The technology revolution has transformed organizations across the private sector, but not ours, not fully, not yet. We are, as they say, tangled in our anchor chain. Our financial systems are decades old. According to some estimates, we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions. We cannot share information from floor to floor in this building because it's stored on dozens of technological systems that are inaccessible or incompatible."
The idea here, is that by placing the statement in context instead of a stand alone statement completely debunks any conspiracy theory that states the money is missing or stolen.
Care to elaborate on this 57channels? Maybe show proof where Rumsfeld stated 2.3 mill was MISSING
Definition of missing :
(of a thing) not able to be found because it is not in its
expected place.
"a quantity of cash has gone missing"
synonyms: lost, mislaid, misplaced, absent, gone (astray), gone AWOL, unaccounted for; not present or included when expected or supposed to be.
Definition of track :
follow the course or trail of (someone or something), typically in order to find them or note their location at various points.
"secondary radars that track the aircraft in flight"
synonyms: follow, trail, trace, pursue, shadow, stalk, keep an eye on, keep in sight; informal-tail.
Do you notice the peculiar similarity between the two words parrot? Maybe they might mean the same?
Rumsfeld gives a press conference on 9-10-2001 and admits the gooberment "lost track" of 2.3 Trillion in transactions. I believe that is the EXACT same as saying "we can't find it and it's missing".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVpSBUgbxBU
I'm always glad to help
|
6/23/2015 9:42:50 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
And you've been proving this how? By claiming there's rust where there isn't? You know, if name calling and personal attacks is your way of proving anything, then you really are a dumb country boy.
And your proof that there is not rust on that piece of fuselage issssssssssssss?
By the way, this country boy must not be too damn dumb because so far he's wiping the floor with you over educated numb nuts with no common sense
[Edited 6/23/2015 9:45:30 PM ]
|
6/23/2015 9:53:28 PM |
|
|
juma2112
Wheat Ridge, CO
50, joined Jan. 2011
|
Godzilla. He is the reason the towers collapsed.
Hes also the reason homeowners/renters insurance in Tokyo is OUTRAGEOUS!
|
6/23/2015 9:57:58 PM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
And your proof that there is not rust on that piece of fuselage issssssssssssss?
By the way, this country boy must not be too damn dumb because so far he's wiping the floor with you over educated numb nuts with no common sense
|
6/23/2015 10:30:51 PM |
|
|
tragicparrot
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014
|
And your proof that there is not rust on that piece of fuselage issssssssssssss?
Please point out where you see rust srv63. And don't forget to use your crayons.
|
6/23/2015 10:54:53 PM |
|
|
louie6332
Falkville, AL
73, joined Nov. 2011
|
The missing trillions were part of the Federal Government’s Black Op budget and went largely into the building of a massive complex of underground tunnels and underground cities in the US meant for the elites who control our government, and for the purchase of massive amounts of military equipment and ammo, intended to be used against the American people, and massive amounts of stored survival food. And trillions are still being siphoned off.
They are expecting disasters in 2015 and 2016, such as a world economic collapse, a civil uprising, which they will incite, if necessary, with a government false flag operation, the flyby of Nibiru, an asteroid strike and associated earthquake disaster, and the Third World War. They hope to survive all this underground. However, God has other plans.
Louie
|
6/23/2015 10:55:42 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Cool Higgy! That was the info I've been waiting for. I just contacted Pratt & Whitney about this.
http://www.pwc.ca/en/home
Shill finds out that wrong engine planted on Murray St. :
6/21/2015 5:09:01 PM
class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,390)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014
Shill gets a hard on thinking higgy is going to save the day :
6/22/2015 1:31:50 AM
class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,390)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014
About24 hours later shill posts that murray street 747 engine was debunked in "just a couple minutes"
I think you sweated allot more than "a couple minutes" noclass
You know what the best part is? The Murray St. engine NEVER was debunked so guess what, you better try again.
|
6/23/2015 11:04:18 PM |
|
|
tragicparrot
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014
|
The missing trillions were part of the Federal Government’s Black Op budget and went largely into the building of a massive complex of underground tunnels and underground cities in the US meant for the elites who control our government, and for the purchase of massive amounts of military equipment and ammo, intended to be used against the American people, and massive amounts of stored survival food. And trillions are still being siphoned off.
They are expecting disasters in 2015 and 2016, such as a world economic collapse, a civil uprising, which they will incite, if necessary, with a government false flag operation, the flyby of Nibiru, an asteroid strike and associated earthquake disaster, and the Third World War. They hope to survive all this underground. However, God has other plans.
Louie
Pretty sad when THEY or the NWO must rely on asteroids and natural disasters to complete their false flag operations.
|
6/23/2015 11:05:53 PM |
|
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Please point out where you see rust srv63. And don't forget to use your crayons.
Do i need to take you by the hand here or do we need to trade in your bifocals ?
|
6/23/2015 11:53:14 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
@ CrEaMpUff,
I don't have to prove that fuselage was planted, all i have to do is prove it's not from flight 175 and so far ummmmmmmm, i think i'm doing it
No you're not actually. You cannot provide proof that it is not from UA175. What you are doing is just nitpicking, splitting hairs and grasping at straws, besides making yourself look like an absolute d*ck.
|
6/23/2015 11:54:23 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
To ALL readers ,
Look at the photo that our debunker class5 has graciously posted on the previous page of the intire fuselage supposedly from flight 75.Notice from a distance it appears the same, even in color and looks like it came from a recently crashed aircraft. Now look at the closer view of the fuselage and you actually notice the weather beaten looks of it, very faded paint even to the point of rusting in some areas. Now notice the most recent zoomed in photo of the area where the planes I.D. numbers are above the farthest left window.
Just for the hell of it, let's say the area around where the planes I.D. numbers are, was as weather beaten and rusted like the rest of the fuselage and i wanted to convince you that the fuselage was from flight 175. If i had a cheap can of gray primer and a roll of masking tape, i bet i could paint a "N and part of a 6" within 30 minutes, even painting over the rust. Now look at that zoomed in photo of the "N6" on that fuselage and tell me if it don't look like a shitty looking paint job over rust and other imperfections
This crap just reads like the desperate attempt of an idiot to sound relevant.
How's that proof coming?
|
6/23/2015 11:55:02 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Just my dumb 2 cents
Nailed it!
How's that proof coming?
|
6/24/2015 12:00:37 AM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
About24 hours later shill posts that murray street 747 engine was debunked in "just a couple minutes"
Liar, I did not state that. To find the pics I posted took a couple of minutes. Lame evasion D*ckhead.
How's that proof coming?
I think you sweated allot more than "a couple minutes" noclass
I typed in 'Murray St engine' on the ISF search and it all came up. No work at all.
You know what the best part is? The Murray St. engine NEVER was debunked so guess what, you better try again.
I know you're too stupid to get it, but I never said that. Now, because you're a moron, I'll spell it out for you.
I showed that the debris was from UA 175 despite all your little fits and half-baked claims. That means your argument about the origin of the engine is specious. I know you have absolutely NO experience in logic, but that's the point that flew right over your inbred head.
You should really try to lift your game as it gets boring dumbing down simple concepts for you and your fellow idiots.
Now do you understand?
|
6/24/2015 12:04:58 AM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
And your proof that there is not rust on that piece of fuselage issssssssssssss?
By the way, this country boy must not be too damn dumb because so far he's wiping the floor with you over educated numb nuts with no common sense
I think that is all in your head there Cletus. You have not been able to discredit the origin of the part despite all your inconsequential quibbles and imaginings.
Actually, watching you desperately trying to get some cred on this is rather hilarious.
Lovin' it! So, this idiot hasn't got a grasshopper's chance in a Supernova of proving this evidence specious, therefore I challenge anyone to have a go.
It's put up time for 9/11 truth! Anyone care to disprove the validity of this part with any credible evidence other than some idiot welder braying about rust no-one can see?
|
6/24/2015 12:42:16 AM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I offer a rational explanation for the faint ruddy, powdery material that SRV assumes is rust.
Perhaps it is dust from the collapse itself?
The WTC dust particles used by Jones /Harritt and Millette for analysis are referred to as red-grey chips. This is due to the steel frame being coated in a rust preventative, and this is red in colour. As the building collapsed, untold square meters of paint flakes contributed to the dust cloud and these red-grey chips comprise a large part of every sample taken.
Now, the part in question came to rest on top of 5WTC and was filmed before the second tower collapsed raining debris and dust down onto 5WTC.
Red-grey dust chips would be a rational explanation of the slight ruddy powder that SRV is trying to claim is rust (and planted-both without a scrap of evidence).
So SRV, where's your study denoting that the composition of the ruddy powder is actually rust and not rust preventative?
Hmmm....?
Anyway, one can offer a rational explanation before racing off to Insanity Beach screaming 'planted!'
|
6/24/2015 12:43:21 AM |
|
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
Oh but it has been debunked. YOU and weez are hanging all your faith on the two parts;
Please read the information below and do try to understand that those TWO parts do belong to each other.
"those two piece parts are part of an assembly, not independent of one another.
HPT Stage 1 Cooling Duct Assembly has 24 holes on the outer flange. The part has to be photographed that way because of the TOBI tubes.
The HPT Stage 1 Cooling Duct (TOBI Configuration 2) is NOT an assembly and therefore cannot be considered to do the same job as the assembly, it is simply a part of an assembly.
Notice it also has 24 holes, which means it bolts to the same section as the assembly. Now what do you notice about the photo compared to the first? That's right the holes are on top whereas the first photo the holes are on the bottom. Therefore this part is photographed "upside down" relative to the first part. Therefore it's impossible to see if it has TOBI tubes or whether another part with TOBI tubes is attached to this (and may be others) to form a full assembly.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET E3NE
TCDS NUMBER E3NE
REVISION: 15
DATE: February 10, 2000
PRATT & WHITNEY
"-7R4D Bascially the same as JT9D-7 (see TCDS E20EA) except incorporates an improved fan, higher efficiency 4 stage LPC, single crystal first stage turbine blades, improved use of turbine cooling air and a supervisory Electronic Engine Control. Takeoff rating of 48,000 lb at and below 92ºF ambient temperature, sea level static."
Well, hello there srv, I see that you missed commenting on this, any reason why? Maybe it debunks you?
You also missed commenting on the looking in the wrong direction for the engine, any reason why? Maybe that too debunks you and the rest of you nutcases.
Do what 57 channels has done, just slink away. You have been debunked countless times.
|
6/24/2015 12:53:12 AM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Hi Higgy!
It looks like they've got nowhere left to go on this canard.
|
6/24/2015 12:57:26 AM |
|
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
Rumsfeld gives a press conference on 9-10-2001 and admits the gooberment "lost track" of 2.3 Trillion in transactions. I believe that is the EXACT same as saying "we can't find it and it's missing".
I'm always glad to help
Hey fool...you do understand that this was first announced wayyyy back before 2001 don't you?
Please do read and you will see that it isn't "missing" as in disappeared, it cannot be accounted for via the means of vouchers and accounting documents.
In fiscal 1999, a defense audit found that about $2.3 trillion of balances, transactions and adjustments were inadequately documented. These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised, but that tracking down needed documents would take a long time. Auditors, she said, might have to go to different computer systems, to different locations or access different databases to get information.
http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44199
|
6/24/2015 12:58:20 AM |
|
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
Hi Higgy!
It looks like they've got nowhere left to go on this canard.
Of course not, they never do when they have been debunked, they just look for another 'angle', ergo this new rust or paint bullshit!
|
6/24/2015 1:06:32 AM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Of course not, they never do when they have been debunked, they just look for another 'angle', ergo this new rust or paint bullshit!
|
6/24/2015 1:58:04 AM |
|
|
funwithmusic
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007
|
Its funny how you b*tch and moan about the so called Rights of the Sandy Hook Lying parents..
and yet..THE WTC VICTIMS FAMILIES WANT A NEW INVESTIGATION AND YET YOU DONT SUPPORT THAT...
Your speak with forked tongue..
NOW THE LIARS CLAIM THEY FOUND A PLANE ENGINE WEDGED IN BETWEEN A VERY VERY NARROW SPACE
GEESH...WHAT WILL THESE BASTARDS NOT LIE ABOUT?
WE DIDNT BY THE MURRAY ST ENGINE THAT DOES NOT MATCH THE SO CALLED BOEING...SO THEY PLANT YET ANOTHER...
YOU GUYS ARE A TOTAL JOKE....YOU MAKE NO SENSE...YOUR FOR RIGHTS OF SANDY HOOK LIARS..BUT OPPOSE RIGHTS FOR TRUE VICTIMS OF WTC..
GEESSH...You sway one way..then another cause your house is built on sand..you wave back and forth with the waves...You have no foundation.
LOOK HOW CLEAN THAT ENGINE IS..NOT ONE SPECK OF DUST ON IT ANYWHERE
BELEIVE THEM IF YOU WISH..I PREFER NOT TO.
ITS THERMITE..ITS BEEN PROVEN ALREADY...you dont mistake nuke thermite with rust...geesshhh
[Edited 6/24/2015 1:59:51 AM ]
|
6/24/2015 7:17:51 AM |
|
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
You people love the smell of your own farts.
|
6/24/2015 10:41:12 AM |
|
|
57channels
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008
|
Fun
that's a great point about the 911 family members that want a real investigation into how and why their loved ones died on 911.
you can expect the three kitties will want proof of that. they will want names, addresses, social security numbers, everything else,of every 911 family member and an exact quote from each and every one of them--- which is an impossibility because they all are under gag orders.
oh there I go again telling the truth telling it how it really is
|
6/24/2015 10:48:31 AM |
|
|
57channels
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008
|
Fun/SRV/ Patriots
you think for one minute Oprah Winfrey would have any 911 members on her show shortly after 9 11 or a year or to later after a lot of stuff came out?
hell if she tried that the feds would a shut her show down in a heartbeat. or they would have thrown a bunch of heroin in her car trunk and call some crooked cops and should have been accused of being a heroin dealer.
|
6/24/2015 2:12:53 PM |
|
|
naprinciple
West Plains, MO
46, joined Feb. 2014
|
EMERGENCY WARNING FOR OFFICE WORKERS
https://youtu.be/L7U22m9xLrQ
Do you work in a large office building? Then you should know about this recently discovered flaw in ALL EXISTING BUILDING CODES AND FIRE REGULATIONS that could cause the complete collapse of your office building. For more information on this phenonmenon, please email NIST at [email protected]
|
6/24/2015 2:31:20 PM |
|
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
Fun
that's a great point about the 911 family members that want a real investigation into how and why their loved ones died on 911.
you can expect the three kitties will want proof of that. they will want names, addresses, social security numbers, everything else,of every 911 family member and an exact quote from each and every one of them--- which is an impossibility because they all are under gag orders.
oh there I go again telling the truth telling it how it really is
Quite the opposite, it is fools like Fun that DEMAND death certs of the Sandy Hook kids.
You were challenge ions ago to provide LINKS where people admitted to being crisis actors. We still await those links.
|
6/24/2015 5:14:55 PM |
|
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Its funny how you b*tch and moan about the so called Rights of the Sandy Hook Lying parents..
and yet..THE WTC VICTIMS FAMILIES WANT A NEW INVESTIGATION AND YET YOU DONT SUPPORT THAT...
Your speak with forked tongue..
A BIG RED FISH OF THE HERRING VARIETY. That would have to be the most illogical and brain dead association I've ever seen you make. What a ridiculous comment.
There is no evidence to build a prima facie case for a new investigation. Your Red Herring is illogical and brain dead.
WE DIDNT BY THE MURRAY ST ENGINE THAT DOES NOT MATCH THE SO CALLED BOEING...SO THEY PLANT YET ANOTHER...
Another lie, that is landing gear that was found about two years ago. Please try to learn this subject, as your errors merely waste time.
[quote[YOU GUYS ARE A TOTAL JOKE....YOU MAKE NO SENSE...
|