Select your best hookup:
Local
Gay
Asian
Latin
East Europe

www skipthegames

When males say this to me, it makes me really feel like some thing is incorrect with me — specially due to the fact 99% of the males who use corny lines like this will not make any moves to take me off the marketplace. ohio dating sites Despite the fact that we haven t perfected the art of meaningful conversation over dinner and drinks just however, I believe we ve come a lengthy way given that we first began dating. Positive, going out on dates can be exciting and fascinating, potentially leading to new relationships — sadly, the probability of obtaining a single of these good dates is rarely in your favor. milfaholic legit With all that in thoughts, here are some intriguing and fun initially date inquiries to get you inspired.

megapwrsonals

A lot of the tougher concerns with difficult to crack answers come when you ask about future plans. www datehookup Kochava s data shows that most of MeetMe s customers are in the 46 to 55 year old variety, closely followed by the 55 to 65 bracket. 1 factor that can assistance ease the anxiety of 1st dates is to have a couple of ideas of what to do when you ask for an in person date. usasexguide ft myers fl Just this time last year, I was waiting for him to turn into a fuckboy, and he has proved me wrong every single time.

Home  Sign In  Search  Date Ideas  Join  Forums  Singles Groups  - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!


6/30/2015 4:04:39 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (5,952)
Paducah, KY
64, joined May. 2008


cl---ass

However, when the image was cleaned up, this was the result (note magnification):
=====================================================
Hey...was that image filmed at studio A or studio B out in Hollywood. Then fill in arrows of wings, fuselage, tail, engine ect.ect. and some twinkie 8 year old cowardss like apo will give ya a high 5.

Oh and then photoshop a real plane into the mix [ like they did with 175 but that was a lousy photoshop one plane black, the left wing dissappears, the nose comes out the other side, no parts of the plane or building break off and fall tot he ground. The fake plane just lands inside the building as the south tower swallows the plane..then the feds are the fireball and smoke........and dont forget those " HORRIFIED VOICES " Cant forget them

Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!

DateHookup.dating - 100% Free Personals


6/30/2015 4:04:57 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:

Now now now...............you wont get an ice cream cone unless you do your homework


Oh, BTW, I did my homework, I debunked srv when he said she was IN the FBI. I showed him that it was said TWICE that she was a cleaner.

Now 57, about these wonderful missiles of yours that were supposed to hit the Towers and the Pentagon, just where were they fired from?

6/30/2015 4:09:08 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (5,952)
Paducah, KY
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

Where was the missile(s) fired from?
===========================================
I am gonna say this once and only once. The missiles used on both big towers and the Pentagon were fired from the U.S. military.......either the Navy or the Air Force or any branch of the armed forces that can fire a missile. They could have fired a new type of missile or projectile that we the people never heard of before too.

Answer: The U.S. military

6/30/2015 4:10:54 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

Where was the missile(s) fired from?
===========================================
I am gonna say this once and only once. The missiles used on both big towers and the Pentagon were fired from the U.S. military.......either the Navy or the Air Force or any branch of the armed forces that can fire a missile. They could have fired a new type of missile or projectile that we the people never heard of before too.

Answer: The U.S. military


Not WHO, stupid fool...WHERE FROM

6/30/2015 4:15:25 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


You see 57, it is VERY important that you have any knowledge of where WHERE they were fired from because without an one tiny iota of knowledge or proof (and we know you will say it doesn't matter where from or it was somewhere in the ocean or from a plane) without something tangible, you have nothing.

We, the people, have eye witnesses that planes hit the Towers, we have a LIVE FEED that shows a plane hitting the tower - remember that video you posted and asked "where was the plane?" and I had to point it out to you and even told you the minute and second on YOUR video where it was - we have evidence of planes hitting the Towers...YOU HAVE NOTHING to indicate it was a missile, do you? You have nothing tangible, not one minute piece.

6/30/2015 4:55:06 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
cl---ass

However, when the image was cleaned up, this was the result (note magnification):
=====================================================
Hey...was that image filmed at studio A or studio B out in Hollywood. Then fill in arrows of wings, fuselage, tail, engine ect.ect. and some twinkie 8 year old cowardss like apo will give ya a high 5.

Oh and then photoshop a real plane into the mix [ like they did with 175 but that was a lousy photoshop one plane black, the left wing dissappears, the nose comes out the other side, no parts of the plane or building break off and fall tot he ground. The fake plane just lands inside the building as the south tower swallows the plane..then the feds are the fireball and smoke........and dont forget those " HORRIFIED VOICES " Cant forget them


And the house moron chimes in with his usual brain dread shit. What a f**king idiot.

6/30/2015 5:51:58 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (5,952)
Paducah, KY
64, joined May. 2008


Cant you kiddies read or maybe you cant comprehend????

Oh and then photoshop a real plane into the mix [ like they did with 175 but that was a lousy photoshop one plane black, the left wing dissappears, the nose comes out the other side, no parts of the plane or building break off and fall tot he ground. The fake plane just lands inside the building as the south tower swallows the plane..then the feds are the fireball and smoke........and dont forget those " HORRIFIED VOICES " Cant forget them

Copy what I just said and read it 30 times a day instead of your little black book published by Perle/Cheney/Wolfowitz/Myers/Mueller/Mossad....you know the dudes guilty of High Treason and mass murder

6/30/2015 6:10:39 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

Where was the missile(s) fired from?
===========================================
I am gonna say this once and only once. The missiles used on both big towers and the Pentagon were fired from the U.S. military.......either the Navy or the Air Force or any branch of the armed forces that can fire a missile. They could have fired a new type of missile or projectile that we the people never heard of before too.

Answer: The U.S. military


So now instead of wasting everybody's time, how bout you 57channels, who's main purpose here was to enlighten both the young and old on the truth behind our evil government, come up with a detailed summary of the alleged plot? You know, the whole story put together. I mean, why post a shitload of scientific impossibilities unless your able to share with everyone the big picture?

6/30/2015 6:20:54 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (5,952)
Paducah, KY
64, joined May. 2008


tragic

You know, the whole story put together. I mean, why post a shitload of scientific impossibilities unless your able to share with everyone the big picture?
===============================================
Well, if youd have paid attention the last 13 years you would know the full story. I'm not going to repeat it again, because your job would be to say prove it over and over again. I have learned 1 big thing the last 6 months though. Fun showed that there was a van and the FBI lifted something heavy out of that van near Murray street. I certainly didnt need that extra proof, but it was neat. They are laughing at sheeple like you.

6/30/2015 6:21:27 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
Cant you kiddies read or maybe you cant comprehend????

Oh and then photoshop a real plane into the mix [ like they did with 175 but that was a lousy photoshop one plane black, the left wing dissappears, the nose comes out the other side, no parts of the plane or building break off and fall tot he ground. The fake plane just lands inside the building as the south tower swallows the plane..then the feds are the fireball and smoke........and dont forget those " HORRIFIED VOICES " Cant forget them

Copy what I just said and read it 30 times a day instead of your little black book published by Perle/Cheney/Wolfowitz/Myers/Mueller/Mossad....you know the dudes guilty of High Treason and mass murder


I can comprehend perfectly. It's just that your unsupported stories are stupid. No matter how many times it is read, it will never be anything but a fantasy of your own construction, and why should anyone bother with that?

You just don't get how this is done.

6/30/2015 6:31:21 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
tragic

You know, the whole story put together. I mean, why post a shitload of scientific impossibilities unless your able to share with everyone the big picture?
===============================================
Well, if youd have paid attention the last 13 years you would know the full story. I'm not going to repeat it again, because your job would be to say prove it over and over again. I have learned 1 big thing the last 6 months though. Fun showed that there was a van and the FBI lifted something heavy out of that van near Murray street. I certainly didnt need that extra proof, but it was neat. They are laughing at sheeple like you.


Ok, so just summarize it, or at least state the theory of the crime itself. Why keep posting the same old claims when you could easily have done that by now? Are you avoiding something? And BTW, fun showed nothing of the sort in regards to the FBI lifting something out of a white van. And really, who's laughing when the crimes you speak of are so serious?



[Edited 6/30/2015 6:32:06 PM ]

6/30/2015 7:51:47 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
HEY srv.....we wonder and wait for you to answer this question, don't you ever get tired of dancing?


All you have to do is debunk me enough that you get the false sense of victory, then you will be put to shame, hence the "buried" part. Any takers?

6/30/2015 7:52:25 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

progrocknic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (11,854)
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
online now!


Quote from srv63:
All you have to do is debunk me enough that you get the false sense of victory, then you will be put to shame, hence the "buried" part. Any takers?


I'm still waiting for evidence of a conspiracy. Any at all.

6/30/2015 7:57:39 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (5,952)
Paducah, KY
64, joined May. 2008


tragic

And really, who's laughing when the crimes you speak of are so serious?
=========================================
I have named the names of the people who are laughing at the rabble that have let them get away with their treason and mass murder. Perle, Wolfowitz, Cheney, Mossad, ect.ect. The US Congress have also turned a blind eye and rolled over and took the 19 Arab hijacker spin up their cowardly asses.

6/30/2015 8:10:04 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
What is it made of then if not aluminium?

And where is your proof she wasn't a cleaner? I bet you are getting tired of me asking for this information aren't you? We know why too...it shows you for a fool because you have no evidence, do you?


The fuselage on top of wtc5 is made of TIN and NOT aluminum so keep up higgy. It's no time for your a.d.d. episodes or were just gonna leave your a** behind.

As far as your "cleaner", again focus on just one subject at a time which right now is the tin fuselage .Prove it's from a commercial airliner then we will move on to your "cleaner"

6/30/2015 8:13:26 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
The fuselage on top of wtc5 is made of TIN and NOT aluminum so keep up higgy.


Er, that still has to be demonstrated. You forgot that step. You assume your conclusion without evidence, and that is just not good enough.

You should try to validate your opinion with evidence, that is the usual procedure. Biased guesses don't cut it in the real world.

6/30/2015 8:18:00 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
All you have to do is debunk me enough that you get the false sense of victory, then you will be put to shame, hence the "buried" part. Any takers?


More brain dead stalling. Your logic is arse about, as you have to debunk us (there's that burden of proof thing you constantly have trouble with). You have not provided evidence to support your claims whereas I have, and you've been unable to discredit any evidence I've posted thus far.

Your claims are worthless as a result. Just like those of 57 channels, Louie the looney, and the Nazi. No supporting evidence, just stupid and illogical claims pulled out of your collective fundamental orifices.


You keep kidding yourself...it's quite funny.

6/30/2015 8:18:03 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Not WHO, stupid fool...WHERE FROM


My My My, someone woke up this morning with their panties tight up their crack

6/30/2015 8:20:12 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
My My My, someone woke up this morning with their panties tight up their crack


Can you blame him? The guy's as thick as a block of sandstone.

6/30/2015 8:23:55 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
My My My, someone woke up this morning with their panties tight up their crack


And you woke up still thinking airliners are made of tin.

6/30/2015 8:29:31 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from class5:
More brain dead stalling. Your logic is arse about, as you have to debunk us (there's that burden of proof thing you constantly have trouble with). You have not provided evidence to support your claims whereas I have, and you've been unable to discredit any evidence I've posted thus far.

Your claims are worthless as a result. Just like those of 57 channels, Louie the looney, and the Nazi. No supporting evidence, just stupid and illogical claims pulled out of your collective fundamental orifices.


You keep kidding yourself...it's quite funny.


Welcome back cupcake.I think you shills have got the playbook rules wrong in thinking that us Truthers have to prove you wrong. All we have to do is give a more logical explanation to what really happened on 9/11 (than your gooberments official story) and enough to cause doubt that warrants a new REAL investigation then we can all enjoy and rejoice as the tyrants bones are swinging from a tree

6/30/2015 8:30:20 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

progrocknic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (11,854)
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
online now!


I'm just going to go out on a limb and say I'm not going to see any evidence of a conspiracy.

6/30/2015 8:32:49 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
And you woke up still thinking airliners are made of tin.


Hmmmm, looks like the parrot might be catching on because airliners are NOT made of tin. Care to tell us what that means grasshopper?

6/30/2015 8:37:25 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from progrocknic:
I'm just going to go out on a limb and say I'm not going to see any evidence of a conspiracy.


I'm gonna go way out on a limb and predict 20 years down the road your still no more intelligent than a bag of rocks

6/30/2015 8:39:53 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Hmmmm, looks like the parrot might be catching on because airliners are NOT made of tin. Care to tell us what that means grasshopper?


Care to tell us what it meant when you stated this srv?

Quote from srv "The fuselage on top of wtc5 is made of TIN and NOT aluminum so keep up higgy. It's no time for your a.d.d. episodes or were just gonna leave your a** behind."

Or this?

"Is that right that us Truthers do nothing but fabricate huh? Ok wanna be shill, what do you see on that tin piece]/b] of fuselage? I say rust, your butt buddy says dust or fine debris and the majority of america says rust.What's your input cupcake and you better not say jello because that answer is saved for higgy. Parrot says it's runny dog shit from the bomb sniffing dog on the roof earlier so what's your answer cupcake?"



[Edited 6/30/2015 8:41:49 PM ]

6/30/2015 8:42:08 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

progrocknic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (11,854)
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
online now!


Quote from srv63:
I'm gonna go way out on a limb and predict 20 years down the road your still no more intelligent than a bag of rocks


What a shock. A post with no evidence.

6/30/2015 8:44:27 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Welcome back cupcake.I think you shills have got the playbook rules wrong in thinking that us Truthers have to prove you wrong. All we have to do is give a more logical explanation to what really happened on 9/11 (than your gooberments official story) and enough to cause doubt that warrants a new REAL investigation then we can all enjoy and rejoice as the tyrants bones are swinging from a tree


What a load of uneducated nonsense replete with the usual stupidity. If you disagree with the accepted version the onus is on you to demonstrate why. If you claim that the fuselage is made of tin, you have to prove it. Trying to push this burden onto is just another truther trick and you're not the first, nor the best by any stretch of the imagination.

It's that simple. What will it take to get that to sink into your thick skull?

Furthermore, I owe you nothing.

Now, how's that evidence for rust coming? I'm way ahead of you here and you need to catch up-a lot.





[Edited 6/30/2015 8:47:57 PM ]

6/30/2015 8:45:30 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from progrocknic:
What a shock. A post with no evidence.


He is just a delaying troll who is here to act like a douche. I don't believe he is actually interested in the subject.

6/30/2015 8:46:53 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from class5:
He is just a delaying troll who is here to act like a douche. I don't believe he is actually interested in the subject.


He's an embarrassment to trolls!

6/30/2015 8:49:02 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from tragicparrot:
He's an embarrassment to trolls!


Yeah, he's not one of the better ones. The truther known as kokomojojo has it all over this guy.

6/30/2015 8:52:31 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Not WHO, stupid fool...WHERE FROM


As i have previously stated, us Truthers have no burden of proof here, we just need to come up with a more logical explanation to what really happened on 9/11. We don't need to prove where the missile was fired from at the pentagon, all we need to do is prove a missile was more likely used than a commercial airliner with folding wings and titanium engines that would nicely fit inside a 12 foot diameter hole. Same goes for the street light poles with bends on the ends in front of the pentacon. We don't need to prove the poles are staged because the poles had nothing to do with the loss of life at the pentacon, the MISSILE going through the wall did.

Pull them panties out of your a** crack higgy and focus

6/30/2015 8:54:29 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

progrocknic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (11,854)
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
online now!


Still no evidence. But now there's a reason. He doesn't need any evidence. Brilliant.

6/30/2015 9:05:10 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
As i have previously stated, us Truthers have no burden of proof here, we just need to come up with a more logical explanation to what really happened on 9/11. We don't need to prove where the missile was fired from at the pentagon, all we need to do is prove a missile was more likely used than a commercial airliner with folding wings and titanium engines that would nicely fit inside a 12 foot diameter hole. Same goes for the street light poles with bends on the ends in front of the pentacon. We don't need to prove the poles are staged because the poles had nothing to do with the loss of life at the pentacon, the MISSILE going through the wall did.

Pull them panties out of your a** crack higgy and focus


And yet your unable to logically explain this...

Quote from srv "The fuselage on top of wtc5 is made of TIN and NOT aluminum so keep up higgy. It's no time for your a.d.d. episodes or were just gonna leave your a** behind."

And this...

"Is that right that us Truthers do nothing but fabricate huh? Ok wanna be shill, what do you see on that tin piece of fuselage? I say rust, your butt buddy says dust or fine debris and the majority of america says rust.What's your input cupcake and you better not say jello because that answer is saved for higgy. Parrot says it's runny dog shit from the bomb sniffing dog on the roof earlier so what's your answer cupcake?"

Then this...

"Hmmmm, looks like the parrot might be catching on because airliners are NOT made of tin. Care to tell us what that means grasshopper?"

6/30/2015 9:06:55 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from class5:
What a load of uneducated nonsense replete with the usual stupidity. If you disagree with the accepted version the onus is on you to demonstrate why. If you claim that the fuselage is made of tin, you have to prove it. Trying to push this burden onto is just another truther trick and you're not the first, nor the best by any stretch of the imagination.

It's that simple. What will it take to get that to sink into your thick skull?

Furthermore, I owe you nothing.

Now, how's that evidence for rust coming? I'm way ahead of you here and you need to catch up-a lot.



If you would comprehend cupcake, i don't need to prove it's rust on that fuselage, instead all i need to do is present the high possibility to other readers with an unbiased logic and THEY will concur that it is in fact rust. You know what the REAL b*tch is here, the visual PROOF of rust is there if i should need to prove it and you stooges are either too close minded or stupid to see it right in front of you

6/30/2015 9:08:59 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
If you would comprehend cupcake, i don't need to prove it's rust on that fuselage, instead all i need to do is present the high possibility to other readers with an unbiased logic and THEY will concur that it is in fact rust. You know what the REAL b*tch is here, the visual PROOF of rust is there if i should need to prove it and you stooges are either too close minded or stupid to see it right in front of you


Hell, we're still awaiting that poll you mentioned earlier. Whats up with that?

6/30/2015 9:11:05 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


So srv.. Tin? Or aluminum?

6/30/2015 9:12:11 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
So srv.. Tin? Or aluminum?


Are you really that dense parrot?

6/30/2015 9:23:55 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Are you really that dense parrot?


So which is it srv? Tin? Or aluminum?

6/30/2015 9:34:51 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Need I remind you srv63 of your earlier statement that the fuselage on top off WTC5 is made of tin and not aluminum? And that you further stated that airliners are NOT made of tin?

6/30/2015 9:42:39 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
If you would comprehend cupcake, i don't need to prove it's rust on that fuselage, instead all i need to do is present the high possibility to other readers with an unbiased logic and THEY will concur that it is in fact rust. You know what the REAL b*tch is here, the visual PROOF of rust is there if i should need to prove it and you stooges are either too close minded or stupid to see it right in front of you


You need to prove it is rust and that is all there is to it.

You are falling behind and we have moved on, but you're still bleating about something you've yet to demonstrate? F**k off, Idiot and get your shit together. You just waste page after page on dumb shit, and all your excuses are pathetic and transparent.

All you do is stall, delay, evade and dodge, and I have no time for that type of troll. I'm actually interested in finding the truth here, something that doesn't seem to concern you.

'Remember the goal of conspiracy theory rhetoric is to bog down the discussion and not reach a concluion'-Jay Whindley

You prove Jay's point, page after page.



[Edited 6/30/2015 9:45:46 PM ]

6/30/2015 9:46:59 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from tragicparrot:
Need I remind you srv63 of your earlier statement that the fuselage on top off WTC5 is made of tin and not aluminum? And that you further stated that airliners are NOT made of tin?


I think this one is just pretending to be stupid to avoid his responsibilities. I'm not buying his brain dead act.

6/30/2015 10:40:58 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (14,983)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007


Quote from tragicparrot:
And yet your unable to logically explain this...

Quote from srv "The fuselage on top of wtc5 is made of TIN and NOT aluminum so keep up higgy. It's no time for your a.d.d. episodes or were just gonna leave your a** behind."

And this...

"Is that right that us Truthers do nothing but fabricate huh? Ok wanna be shill, what do you see on that tin piece of fuselage? I say rust, your butt buddy says dust or fine debris and the majority of america says rust.What's your input cupcake and you better not say jello because that answer is saved for higgy. Parrot says it's runny dog shit from the bomb sniffing dog on the roof earlier so what's your answer cupcake?"

Then this...

"Hmmmm, looks like the parrot might be catching on because airliners are NOT made of tin. Care to tell us what that means grasshopper?"


Silly man..its FABRICATORS that create TRUTHERS....If there were no lies....there would be no need for people to expose the truth...


Even a 5th grader can figure this out..


AMERICA IS BLEEDING...WE NEED TO EXPOSE THOSE WHO ARE STABBING HER IN THE BACK...THE TRAITORS...CHARLETONS...KOL NIDRE LIARS...DEVILS


Wasnt it NUT-MAN-YAHOO..who said that the Jews were going to bleed us till we wither up and blow away into the wind


We are the oppressed.

The Jews are the oppressors

That makes you the BAD GUYS.



[Edited 6/30/2015 10:42:28 PM ]

6/30/2015 10:57:47 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from class5:
You need to prove it is rust and that is all there is to it.

You are falling behind and we have moved on, but you're still bleating about something you've yet to demonstrate? F**k off, Idiot and get your shit together. You just waste page after page on dumb shit, and all your excuses are pathetic and transparent.

All you do is stall, delay, evade and dodge, and I have no time for that type of troll. I'm actually interested in finding the truth here, something that doesn't seem to concern you.

'Remember the goal of conspiracy theory rhetoric is to bog down the discussion and not reach a concluion'-Jay Whindley

You prove Jay's point, page after page.


Only one honest word for you stooge, HORSESHIT

6/30/2015 11:03:35 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from funwithmusic:
Silly man..its FABRICATORS that create TRUTHERS....If there were no lies....there would be no need for people to expose the truth...


Even a 5th grader can figure this out..


AMERICA IS BLEEDING...WE NEED TO EXPOSE THOSE WHO ARE STABBING HER IN THE BACK...THE TRAITORS...CHARLETONS...KOL NIDRE LIARS...DEVILS


Wasnt it NUT-MAN-YAHOO..who said that the Jews were going to bleed us till we wither up and blow away into the wind


We are the oppressed.

The Jews are the oppressors

That makes you the BAD GUYS.


So how does this justify srv63 lying his a** off? Come to think of it, your not very truthful either. And what about Wolfgang Halbig's pending lawsuit? I think you need to send him a donation, else it may never get beyond the docket.

6/30/2015 11:04:33 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Only one honest word for you stooge, HORSESHIT


And only one honest answer from you. Tin? Or aluminum?

6/30/2015 11:13:40 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Only one honest word for you stooge, HORSESHIT


More inane projections without actually knowing. F**king Retard. You are such a waste of oxygen. You wouldn't know the meaning of the word 'honest', twoofer.

Listen Clown, you've got work to do and you waste time trolling. Get to it, as you're a long way behind here and you are just trying to bog the discussion down with evasions. Your type are as common as mud in twooferland.

Now f**k off little man and see to your responsibilities. We have had nothing but trolling from you for God knows how many pages. You contribute nothing to the debate but stupidity.





[Edited 6/30/2015 11:15:39 PM ]

6/30/2015 11:27:08 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Note SRV's tactics. Since the fuselage was posted, this guy has stalled for countless pages in order to avoid his responsibilities. Furthermore, he is employing a common truther tactic of 'burying the evidence', that is, after someone has posted evidence one harps on about something insignificant in order to hide further evidence posted among the noise. 57 and the Nazi also do this, but SRV has taken this to a new height.

There has been much evidence of this tactic employed by truthers in this thread. If it wasn't for the trolling; the unsubstantiated claims; the evasions, the noise and diversions, this thread could be condensed to about 30 or 40 pages. How many pages has it been since SRV stated he was going to debunk everything? 20? 30?

Just more lies.

So truthers, have you the stones to back up your shit or are you just going to keep on employing mendacious and dishonest tactics in order to bog down the discussion in inconsequentials?

If SRV's tactics are any example, my bet is on the latter.





[Edited 6/30/2015 11:30:18 PM ]

7/1/2015 12:03:04 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
funwithmusic
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (14,983)
Chapel Hill, NC
60, joined Feb. 2007


MORE EVIDENCE ISRA-HELLIS DID WTC 9/11

ISRAEL ATTACKED THE USA ON AMERICAN SOIL

THIS IS AN ACT OF WAR.

DEFUND ISRA-HELL TODAY...EXPEL THE TRAITORS FROM WITHIN DUAL CITIZEN ISRA-HELLIES AND THEIR USEFUL AMERICAN IDIOTS...




Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=5367.0



WOW..WHAT DAMNING EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!

7/1/2015 12:08:09 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


More photographic evidence of AA77's wreckage:





[Edited 7/1/2015 12:10:45 AM ]

7/1/2015 12:13:40 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014






7/1/2015 12:15:40 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


A very interesting article on why a missile is incompatible with the evidence for the Pentagon attack:

http://11-settembre.blogspot.com.au/2008/05/why-pentagon-damage-is-incompatible.html

7/1/2015 12:16:57 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
All you have to do is debunk me enough that you get the false sense of victory, then you will be put to shame, hence the "buried" part. Any takers?



Done so, so many times, it is now becoming boring, just as is you very false threat above....you've only been threatening that for some 30 pages.

7/1/2015 12:21:46 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
The fuselage on top of wtc5 is made of TIN and NOT aluminum so keep up higgy. It's no time for your a.d.d. episodes or were just gonna leave your a** behind.

As far as your "cleaner", again focus on just one subject at a time which right now is the tin fuselage .Prove it's from a commercial airliner then we will move on to your "cleaner"



But this is where you dance, for you see we were discussing the "cleaner" way before you switched objects and now brought in the fuselage.

An aircraft fuselage is not made of TIN.

I don't have to prove it is from an airliner, we all know it is from one, the reports say so, the witnesses saw the plane crashing into the towers, they saw people die, leap from buildings and they say the planes going over their heads....we even have the planes hitting the towers on tape and even on LIVE FEEDS.
.

What do you have to support your absurd missile theory srv?

Prove the fuselage is made of tin.

7/1/2015 12:23:59 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
My My My, someone woke up this morning with their panties tight up their crack


But notice how, like you, he cannot and did not and will not answer?

You see srv, unless you have an inkling of events, such as where WHERE were the alleged missiles fired from, what direction and distance away, you have nothing, zilch.

That is why he refuses to answer...BECAUSE HE CAN'T.

Cleaner in the FBI was she?

7/1/2015 12:41:13 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
As i have previously stated, us Truthers have no burden of proof here, we just need to come up with a more logical explanation to what really happened on 9/11. We don't need to prove where the missile was fired from at the pentagon, all we need to do is prove a missile was more likely used than a commercial airliner with folding wings and titanium engines that would nicely fit inside a 12 foot diameter hole. Same goes for the street light poles with bends on the ends in front of the pentacon. We don't need to prove the poles are staged because the poles had nothing to do with the loss of life at the pentacon, the MISSILE going through the wall did.

Pull them panties out of your a** crack higgy and focus


Logical explanation? That is an oxymoron in your case srv...a damn near impossibility.

You don't need to prove it was a missile? Just prove it was more likely and it was a missile with folding wings and titanium engines?

You don't need to prove the poles were staged because they had nothing to do with loss of life?

Good logical thinking.

The Missile with folding wings: Can you please support this with a link to such a missile please? And I assume it did that (folded it's wings) after knocking down the light poles on it's way to the Pentagon to make the 12 foot hole you claim.....so the link?

The Light poles: You mean you don't want to discuss the light poles and the bends at their tops because you can't go against that ONLY a plane with a wide wingspan could have knocked them down, bending the tops on it's way. You cannot debunk the poster who informed you that the light poles were designed to be knocked over with "minimal" force as ALL light poles around ANY airport or structures close to are so designed.

Where was the missile fired from: You say you don't need to prove where it was fired from? Okay, we know the planes took off from - but you CANNOT tell us where YOUR missiles took off from? What was the range of the missile that hit the Pentagon (and the towers)? What was the make of the missile?

You see srv, your evidence is ONLY speculation, you have nothing of anything remotely tangible, so yes my idiotic friend, you DO have the burden of proof to prove it was NOT a plane but a missile.

Just like the proof I published of the taxi drivers wife and you say you have other proof, yet for some reason (but we know why) you refuse to post it, refuse to post that she wasn't a cleaner and therefore an Agent in the FBI, as you have already claimed.

7/1/2015 6:25:36 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
aposorichie
Over 2,000 Posts (2,502)
Berwyn, IL
59, joined Jan. 2009


Quote from srv63:
What if i was to tell you that the blurry assed image supposedly of a plane that noclass posted was really me riding my unicorn and what they claim to have been jet engines were really my nuts hanging.

@ noclass, nice try stooge but NO CIGAR


Sorry SUV but no cigar for you. That is a plane. And now they posted pics of the landing

gear. I know that you want it to be a missle with folding wings but it is not.

How much more do you need to see reality?

7/1/2015 6:48:25 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,446)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from funwithmusic:
MORE EVIDENCE ISRA-HELLIS DID WTC 9/11

ISRAEL ATTACKED THE USA ON AMERICAN SOIL

THIS IS AN ACT OF WAR.

DEFUND ISRA-HELL TODAY...EXPEL THE TRAITORS FROM WITHIN DUAL CITIZEN ISRA-HELLIES AND THEIR USEFUL AMERICAN IDIOTS...




Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD

http://theinfounderground.com/smf/index.php?topic=5367.0



WOW..WHAT DAMNING EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!


Damning evidence my ass...

Really funwith? You get your material from an anti-zionist anti-NWO website who's membership base is only 2000 strong worldwide? Not to mention being connected to Daryl Bradford Smith via Genesis Communications Network known to be associated with none other than Alex Jones. Boy, aren't they real popular! So popular in fact, the show was dropped by GCN in 2006 for spewing out so much unsubstantiated BS, readers and listeners felt as though they just stepped out of an insane asylum.

If wandering the WWW in search of malicious content to fill your hateful needs is all your capable of, then I hope you enjoy your miserable life.

7/1/2015 7:24:30 AM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

class5
Over 1,000 Posts (1,586)
Queensland
Australia
51, joined Jan. 2014


Ouch guys.







7/1/2015 4:03:56 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,063)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
But this is where you dance, for you see we were discussing the "cleaner" way before you switched objects and now brought in the fuselage.

An aircraft fuselage is not made of TIN.

I don't have to prove it is from an airliner, we all know it is from one, the reports say so, the witnesses saw the plane crashing into the towers, they saw people die, leap from buildings and they say the planes going over their heads....we even have the planes hitting the towers on tape and even on LIVE FEEDS.
.

What do you have to support your absurd missile theory srv?

Prove the fuselage is made of tin.


FOR THE RECORD:

I at no time ever stated definitely that a missile had hit either WTC1 or WTC2. I however did state that a missile is THE MOST LIKELY cause of the destruction in the pentagon AND shanksville because both of them sites are DEFINITELY not plane crash sites and anyone that would disagree is a brainless twit.

Tho the idiots that pulled off this murderous hoax might have used a missile on the north tower because noone would be looking up to see it, i firmly believe they would not use a missile again on the south tower because all of america and the world were already looking up at that point. Tho half of all eyewitness testimony has been proven to be jeopardised , we can assume with a high degree of certainty that the south tower was hit by a plane BUT thru the believable eyewitness testimony, the plane was black or gray in color (not the colors of UA175)and doubtful to have had windows in the fuselage therefore giving good reason to look closer at the evidence. Upon closer examination of the photo (graciously posted by noclass) of the fuselage found on the roof of WTC5, it is revealed that the plane that hit WTC2 south tower was NOT a Boeing Commercial Airliner because ALL COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS ARE ALUMINUM, NOT TIN that rusts like the fuselage found on the roof of WTC5. Does this answer your idiotic question clear enough for you parrot or do i need to spell it out in simpler terms for you?

7/1/2015 4:10:03 PM WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,130)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
FOR THE RECORD:



Tho the idiots that pulled off this murderous hoax might have used a missile on the north tower because noone would be looking up to see it, i firmly believe they would not use a missile again on the south tower because all of america and the world were already looking up at that point.


Okayyy...so you BELIEVE a missile hit the north Tower..so what hit the SOUTH Tower as you believe it wasn't a missile?

Oh, in case you have forgotten...proof the Cleaner wasn't on the Janitorial staff...please.