|
best hookup site for cougarsAs getting really like is so high on so several people s wishlist, it really is no wonder the category continues to evolve. craigslist safford az Our virtual coach Lara assists avert and detect cyberbullying. This web site has a extremely straightforward to use interface, which is a really serious benefit for these who have never ever employed international dating platforms ahead of. leslie hannah belle onlyfans Ought to they favorite your video, you ll be able to DM each and every other. hookup com phone numberWe will reject these apps unless they present a one of a kind, higher high quality knowledge. columbus hookup sites However I ve agreed to second dates when I am not certain about a person for the reason that everyone s so nervous on a initial date, you never see the true person. Literally couldn t line up any person to join me, except a guy I swiped proper on that was at a bar nearby the venue. how to find chicks on craigslist How typically do they mention their achievements, promotions, awards and successes? If this takes place a lot, it is a certain indication that this individual has an more than inflated view of his/her achievements. Home Sign In Search Date Ideas Join Forums Singles Groups - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!
3/10/2017 3:45:45 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
for all of you who worship at the feet of Oprah Winfrey, “I just wish this whole generation of white people would die” . Imagine a white individual saying something to this effect. Do you think the liberals will give them the same freedom of thought and expression as Oprah enjoys?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk1jNxQ8x9U
https://youtu.be/Bk1jNxQ8x9U
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
3/10/2017 5:45:37 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
3/10/2017 6:19:55 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
This Woman Is Engaged To A Robot And You’re A Bigot If You Think That’s Weird
March 10, 2017
A French woman by the name of Lilly reportedly fell in love with a robot after realizing she wasn’t attracted to humans.
According to the New York Post, Lilly and her robot lover appeared in an episode of CNN’s “Mostly Human With Laurie Segall” – a show that explores how modern technology affects relationships.
Lilly has reportedly dubbed her robotfriend “InMoovator.”
There is no word yet on what gender “InMoovator” identifies as. According to News.com.au, however, Lilly has a term to describe her sexual orientation – “robosexual.”
“I’m really and only attracted by the robots,” she says. “My only two relationships with men have confirmed my love orientation, because I dislike really physical contact with human flesh.”
Lilly’s family and friends have reportedly accepted her relationship with a non-human entity, and the pair plan to get married as soon as robot-human marriage becomes legal in France.
Jezebel.com reports that Lilly once had a Twitter account, the bio of which you can see below.
“She was probably getting more questions than she’d like,” reads Jezebel writer Aimée Lutkin’s explanation for Lilly’s desire to leave Twitter.
“Which sucks, because someone who can build their own lover is literally hurting no one.”
|
3/10/2017 6:37:16 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
We're still waiting!
|
3/10/2017 6:56:09 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Can you imagine the cost $$ to the American taxpayer for this!!
|
3/10/2017 7:03:58 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
cafe_express
Mobile, AL
84, joined Mar. 2013
|
for all of you who worship at the feet of Oprah Winfrey, “I just wish this whole generation of white people would die” . Imagine a white individual saying something to this effect. Do you think the liberals will give them the same freedom of thought and expression as Oprah enjoys?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bk1jNxQ8x9U
https://youtu.be/Bk1jNxQ8x9U
I remember when she said that. Too bad we are stuck with attitudes like hers in the younger generation.
|
3/10/2017 7:04:43 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
3/10/2017 7:24:12 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
shawnee_b
Edmonton, KY
62, joined Apr. 2010
|
Whos Oprah?
|
3/11/2017 11:18:59 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Thirty-one Senators signed a letter asking Homeland Security to maximize the number of blue collar outsourcing visas that allow U.S. based corporations to import low-skilled workers instead of hiring Americans to do the work.
…
The number of H-2B visas issued had long been held to 66,000 visas but was wildly expanded by Obama in the last year of his presidency, to 264,000. Now, almost 40% of the Republican caucus wants to keep it at that level.
These are the turncoat Republican senators:
http://redrocktribune.com/republican-trying-sabotage-trump/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=facebook
|
3/11/2017 11:23:09 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
3/11/2017 11:47:19 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
a very interesting study!
The Irish Slave Trade – The Slaves That Time Forgot
Christian WinthropMarch 7, 2017
by G John Sit
We’ve all been taught the horror’s of the African slave trade. It’s in all the school books and in plenty of Hollywood movies. But for some reason the largest group of slaves in the British Colonies in the 17th Century doesn’t get mentioned at all:
The Irish
Most people have heard of the Great Famine, which reduced the population of Ireland by around 25%. That pales in comparison to the disaster that England inflicted upon Ireland between1641 and 1652, when the population of Ireland fell from 1,466,000 to 616,000.
Then things got worse.
What to do with the Irish?
From the Tudor reconquest of Ireland until Irish Independence in 1921, the English puzzled over the problem of what to do with all those Irish people. They were the wrong religion. They spoke the wrong language. But the big problem was that there were just too many of them.
The English had been practicing a slow genocide against the Irish since Queen Elizabeth, but the Irish bred too fast and were tough to kill. On the other side of the Atlantic, there was a chronic labor shortage (because the local natives tended to die out too quickly in slavery conditions).
Putting two and two together, King James I started sending Irish slaves to the new world. The first recorded sale of Irish slaves was to a settlement in the Amazon in 1612, seven years before the first African slaves arrived in Jamestown.
The Proclamation of 1625 by James II made it official policy that all Irish political prisoners be transported to the West Indies and sold to English planters. Soon Irish slaves were the majority of slaves in the English colonies.
In 1629 a large group of Irish men and women were sent to Guiana, and by 1632, Irish were the main slaves sold to Antigua and Montserrat in the West Indies. By 1637 a census showed that 69% of the total population of Montserrat were Irish slaves, which records show was a cause of concern to the English planters. But there were not enough political prisoners to supply the demand, so every petty infraction carried a sentence of transporting, and slaver gangs combed the country sides to kidnap enough people to fill out their quotas.
The slavers were so full of zest that they sometimes grabbed non-Irishmen. On March 25, 1659, a petition was received in London claiming that 72 Englishmen were wrongly sold as slaves in Barbados, along with 200 Frenchmen and 7-8,000 Scots.
Irish Slaves in Barbados
So many Irish slaves were sent to Barbados, between 12,000 and 60,000, that the term “barbadosed” began to be used. By the 1630’s, Ireland was the primary source of the English slave trade. And then disaster struck.
Cromwell
After Oliver Cromwell defeated the royalists in the English Civil War, he turned to Ireland, who had allied themselves with the defeated royalists. What happened next could be considered genocide.
The famine (caused by the English intentionally destroying foodstocks) and plague that followed Cromwell’s massacres reduced the population of Ireland to around 40%.
And then Cromwell got really nasty.
Anyone implicated in the rebellion had their land confiscated and was sold into slavery in the West Indies. Even catholic landowners who hadn’t taken part of the rebellion had their land confiscated. Catholicism was outlawed and catholic priests were executed when found. To top it off, he ordered the ethnic cleansing of Ireland east of Shannon in 1652. Soldiers were encouraged to kill any Irish who refused to relocate.
Instead of trying to describe the horror, consider the words from the English State Papers in 1742.
“In clearing the ground for the adventurers and soldiers (the English capitalists of that day)… To be transported to Barbados and the English plantations in America. It was a measure beneficial to Ireland, which was thus relieved of a population that might trouble the planters; it was a benefit to the people removed, which might thus be made English and Christians … a great benefit to the West India sugar planters, who desired men and boys for their bondsmen, and the women and Irish girls… To solace them.”
I can’t help but notice that the exact same language and logic used to justify enslavement of the blacks was used to justify enslavement of the Irish. It is something for those who think slavery was simply a matter of skin color to consider. As for the Irish slaves, Cromwell specifically targeted Irish children.
|
3/11/2017 11:47:25 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
“During the 1650s, over 100,000 Irish children between the ages of 10 and 14 were taken from their parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In this decade, 52,000 Irish (mostly women and children) were sold to Barbados and Virginia. Another 30,000 Irish men and women were also transported and sold to the highest bidder. In 1656, [Oliver] Cromwell ordered that 2000 Irish children be taken to Jamaica and sold as slaves to English settlers.”
For some reason, history likes to call these Irish slaves as ‘indentured servants’. As if they were somehow considered better than African slaves. This can be considered an attempt at whitewashing the history of the Irish slave trade.
There does exist indentured servitude where two parties sign a contract for a limited amount of time. This is not what happened to the Irish from 1625 onward. They were sold as slaves, pure and simple. In reality, they were considered by some to be even lower than the blacks.
“…the African slave trade was just beginning during this same period,” writes Martin. “It is well recorded that African slaves, not tainted with the stain of the hated Catholic theology and more expensive to purchase, were often treated far better than their Irish counterparts.”
African slaves were still relatively new, and were expensive to transport such a long distance (50 sterling in the late 1600’s). Irish slaves on the other hand, were relatively cheap in comparison (5 sterling).
If a planter whipped or branded or beat an Irish slave to death, it was never a crime. A death was a monetary setback, but far cheaper than killing a more expensive African. The English masters quickly began breeding the Irish women for both their own personal pleasure and for greater profit. Children of slaves were themselves slaves, which increased the size of the master’s free workforce.
Because Irish slaves were so much cheaper, the loss of investment from torturing and killing them was not considered an effective deterrent. In an ironic twist, this caused some to recommend importing African slaves instead for humanitarian reasons.
Colonel William Brayne wrote to English authorities in 1656 urging the importation of Negro slaves on the grounds that, “as the planters would have to pay much more for them, they would have an interest in preserving their lives, which was wanting in the case of (Irish)….” many of whom, he charged, were killed by overwork and cruel treatment. African Negroes cost generally about 20 to 50 pounds Sterling, compared to 900 pounds of cotton (about 5 pounds Sterling) for an Irish. They were also more durable in the hot climate, and caused fewer problems. The biggest bonus with the Africans though, was they were NOT Catholic, and any heathen pagan was better than an Irish Papist.
It’s impossible to estimate the exact number of Irish sold into slavery during this period. More Irish slaves were sold in the American colonies between 1651 and 1660 than the entire free population of those colonies. In fact, more Irish were sold as slaves in the America’s during the 17th Century than Africans.
White and black slaves
The typical death rate on the slave ships was around 37%. The Irish did often have one advantage over African slaves – most of the time their time in slavery was limited. They were often sold into slavery from 7 to 20 years, while the only way Africans could get out of slavery was to buy their freedom.
Interesting historical note: the last person killed at the Salem Witch Trials was Ann Glover. She and her husband had been shipped to Barbados as a slave in the 1650’s. Her husband was killed there for refusing to renounce catholicism.
In the 1680’s she was working as a housekeeper in Salem. After some of the children she was caring for got sick she was accused of being a witch. At the trial they demanded she say the Lord’s Prayer. She did so, but in Gaelic, because she didn’t know English. She was then hung.
– by G John Sit – Daily Kos
|
3/11/2017 2:14:52 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
louie6332
Falkville, AL
74, joined Nov. 2011
|
Clarity, thanks for the posts on the Protestant England enslavement of Irish Catholics. Protestants, not knowing their history, often claim, incorrectly, that Protestants did not persecute Catholics during the Protest revolt. But the revolting English Protestants not only brutally persecuted Catholics, whose only crime was remaining faithful to the Church established by Jesus Christ, but also persecuted other Protestant denominations as well. The Protestant England persecution of Catholics began in about 1536. But Ireland, which had been Catholic for about a thousand years, thanks to Saint Patrick, who preformed many miracles in behalf of Ireland, remained faithful to the Church. And they have remained faithful ever since despite the brutal persecution that lasted for centuries.
It is revealed in the Catholic prophecies that England will fall to Russia and its Marxist and Muslim allies during the Great Chastisement of God and its Third World War. But after Mary intervenes and raises up the Great Catholic Monarch, King Henry V of France, a descendant of the Dauphin of King Saint Louis XVI of France who will be living in exile in Germany at the time Mary raises him up, and who will Free France and Italy and reestablish the Roman Empire, Henry will free England and then appoint three lords to rule over it for him, after which England, with the help of Ireland, will return to the resurrected and renewed Roman Catholic Church, which Mary will raise up from its grave. At that time Ireland will gain its freedom from Ireland, and never again suffer English persecution or domination. Ireland, having been brutally persecuted by England for centuries, will magnanimously forgive England.
The Great Pope will then consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, as she has requested at Fatima, and a period of peace lasting thirty to thirty four years will be granted to the world. After that, when the Antichrist arises and the second great world revolution of the Apocalypse begins, there will be a great earthquake, and Ireland will sink beneath the sea and be no more—for God had promised this as a favor to Ireland to prevent it from suffering the ravages of the brutal persecution of the Antichrist. This is all foretold.
Louie
|
3/11/2017 2:18:36 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
FAKE HATE CRIME: Woman Admits She Fabricated Story Of Attack By Trump Supporters
Posted Wednesday, March 8th 2017 @ 2pm by Hannity.com Staff
A 21 year-old Michigan woman pleaded guilty to manufacturing a hate crime on Tuesday. Halley Bass, who claimed she was attacked for wearing a liberal 'solidarity pin' in November, admitted that she lied about the whole thing according to a local paper.
"I was suffering from depression at the time," Bass told the court. "I made a superficial scratch on my face. It was visible and I was embarrassed about what I'd done. So, I made up a story and told a friend that a stranger had done it while I was walking. I was encouraged to report it to the police. I made the mistake of doing that."
She claimed the assault was part of an alleged ‘spike’ in violence in the wake of President Trump’s election surprise and the UK’s Brexit vote, and that she was attacked for wearing a ‘solidarity pin’.
“The person must have seen the pin and picked on me," Bass says in the police report. "That's my best guess. No other reason why he would be targeting me."
She described the attacker as a white man in his mid 40s.
The actual events were quite different. Bass used a safety pin and slashed her own face after leaving a Women’s Literature lecture at the University of Michigan.
Read the full story here:
http://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/index.ssf/2017/03/ann_arbor_woman_pleads_guilty_1.html
|
3/11/2017 2:38:34 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Jake Tapper Says His Son “Jokingly” Calls Him Fake News
March 10, 2017
CNN host Jake Tapper says his 7-year-old son calls him “fake news” in anger.
According to The Hollywood Reporter, Tapper said, “[he] now does an impression where whenever I’m bothering him he says, fake news.”
Tapper insists that his son is simply joking and imitating President Donald Trump – who often calls CNN fake news.
These folks appear to think he’s dead serious, though.
DEPLORABLE MEDIA @correctthemedia
Jake Tapper's own son calls him ‘fake news’ to his face. ??http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/323510-tapper-my-son-uses-fake-news-quip
6:41 PM - 10 Mar 2017
Populo Iratus @cmahar3
Even Jake Tapper's 7 year old son calls him #FakeNews http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/323510-tapper-my-son-uses-fake-news-quip …
6:57 PM - 10 Mar 2017
Great Wall of Trump @ProUSAdontBan
@jaketapper I think it's hilarious that your wife's son calls you 'Fake News' when you yell at him. Jake from #FakeNews @CNN
7:51 PM - 10 Mar 2017
Gilberto Pagán Jr. @RUalumnus
@jaketapper That your son calls you "Fake News"? Wow! How old is he? Smart boy. Very insightful.
7:43 PM - 10 Mar 2017 · Clifton, NJ
Right Guy Jeff ???? @Jeff81442228
@jaketapper why would you let this story het out. You look even more a chump. Your son doesn't even respect your #fakenews #tcot #ccot #sad https://twitter.com/Mags4Trump/status/840387007712964608 …
7:53 PM - 10 Mar 2017
The Hollywood Reporter states that Tapper addressed accusations of being a fake news reporter with a vendetta against President Trump.
“To be completely candid, I did fact checks about Barack Obama too,” he said, adding “not at the same rate.”
“I know people hated me then back now but like the fact checks I’m doing about Donald Trump,” he said. “I feel like I’m being consistent.”
|
3/13/2017 10:05:55 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
If you read or see reports that President Trump’s firing of U.S. Attorneys is some kind of radical departure from past history, please consider the case of Bill Clinton, who fired twice as many U.S. Attorneys in one fell swoop.
http://www.nationalreview.com/…/jeff-sessions-us-attorneys-…
|
3/13/2017 10:42:18 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
How Bernie Sanders Changed the Word 'Socialism' in the U.S.
What is Democratic Socialism? (Democratic Socialism / Fabian Socialism / Social Democracy)
Published on Apr 4, 2016
http://www.tomrichey.net
Socialism has become a "cool" word with America's young people. Since Bernie Sanders calls himself a Democratic Socialist, then socialism must be AWESOME, right??? After all, Bernie wants people to have free healthcare and free college. Nothing wrong with that!
The problem is that Bernie Sanders is NOT a democratic socialist - or at least he's not running as one. Many Western European countries provide healthcare and low-cost higher education, but these social programs are made possible by regulated market economies that exist in these countries. Many young people who think that they are socialists are, in actuality, social democrats or even social liberals.
Democratic socialism began in the late 19th century with the Fabian Society. The Fabian socialists, inspired by the "Fabian tactics" against Hannibal used by Fabius Maximus against Hannibal during the Second Punic War, decided that Karl Marx's goals of abolishing private property and free enterprise could be better accomplished by the democratic process than through a violent revolution. Democratic socialists seek the same end as garden variety Marxian socialists (the end of "capitalism"), but by different means (the democratic process).
Thumbnail Image Credit: DonkeyHotey (Flickr)
https://youtu.be/Q-IiopGInV0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-IiopGInV0
Seeing red: Membership triples for the Democratic Socialists of America
Democratic Socialists of America
Protesters with the Los Angeles chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America protest outside the election party for Mayor Eric Garcetti on Tuesday. (Matt Pearce / Los Angeles Times)
Matt PearceMatt PearceContact Reporter
Holding red and white signs, they protested outside Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti’s election party on Tuesday, demanding the city take a tougher stand against deportation.
The next day, they rallied in support of the International Women’s Day strike, demanding social and economic equality for women.
These weren’t liberals. They were card-carrying members of the Democratic Socialists of America, one of the fastest growing groups on the American left.
The surge of activism sweeping the U.S. since Donald Trump’s election has energized the nation’s largest socialist organization, which has tripled in size over the last year to claim more than 19,000 dues-paying members. That’s a record for the DSA, which was founded in 1982.
Was Hitler Elected? Did Hitler Come to Power in a Democratic Society?
Hitler came to power in a Democracy as the NAZIs gained seats in the Reichstag, but he was never elected President in a Democratic election. Hitler was appointed Chancellor in 1933, then became President and Chancellor by decree in 1934 after the NAZIs gained power through democratic and non-democratic means over the course of the 1920’s and early 1930’s.[1][2]
In America we hear “Hitler was elected President in a Democracy” a lot, but the sentence is so semantically wrong it merits a detailed discussion. Yes, Hitler came into power in a democratic society loosely speaking, but no, he was not elected by direct popular vote or anything like that (and in some cases neither were the NAZIs who gained seats in the Reichstag parliament).
Below we will explain how Germany is a mixed-Republic with a Parliament where officials elect the heads of state (they are not a direct democracy), how the corrupt NAZI party didn’t exactly come to power in fair elections in the first place, and how Hitler was appointed Führer under less than democratic circumstances.
TIP: Chancellor (head of government) and President (head of state) are two very similar positions. Similar to King and Prime Minister. Germany was a parliamentary system with two heads of state (before Hitler became President and Chancellor AKA Führer und Reichskanzler).
|
3/13/2017 10:44:39 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
sdgncalix3
Palm Bay, FL
43, joined Dec. 2012
|
(this post has been flagged as inappropriate, sorry.)
|
3/13/2017 10:46:23 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
sdgncalix3
Palm Bay, FL
43, joined Dec. 2012
|
|
3/13/2017 10:57:49 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
jitssbaby617
Roslindale, MA
38, joined Jun. 2014
online now!
|
Couple of anti American pictures right there,, why are you angry?
|
3/13/2017 10:59:00 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
sdgncalix3
Palm Bay, FL
43, joined Dec. 2012
|
How are the anti American?
|
3/13/2017 11:22:36 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
shawnee_b
Edmonton, KY
62, joined Apr. 2010
|
|
3/13/2017 11:42:54 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
shawnee_b
Edmonton, KY
62, joined Apr. 2010
|
|
3/13/2017 11:58:26 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 27 |
|
jitssbaby617
Roslindale, MA
38, joined Jun. 2014
online now!
|
Lol
|
|
|