Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 19

Select your best hookup:

threesome hookup app

For the reason that Allah swt has allowed me to grow closer to him by way of studying our blessed Quran, by means of watching extremely good lectures on line, through reading remarkable articles written by our brothers and sister In certain, I d like to point to our sister Yasmin Mogahed she has written Significantly about relationships, appreciate addictions, and falling in appreciate with the True Factor Allah swt. scottsboro al classified ads For want not download an app to use chat service, use any for for totally free access to yesichat and meet new strangers, make new mates with just one click instantaneously. Acquiring your ideal match in your own neighborhood has by no means been easier with eharmony. puerto rico red light The app notes that three out of four of its users want to go on a second date and in 2017 it wasthe most mentioned dating appinThe New York Timeswedding section.

louisville hookup bars

So, I opted out of dating apps about Dec. dating in greeneville tn Alex Dang is a sophomore pursuing a double important in Pc Engineering and Economics at the University of Maryland. With the ongoing pandemic, online dating has turn out to be prevalent in today s society. find a girlfriend online in sri lanka Generally, girls require emotional connection just before they get intimate with an individual when guys don t necessarily want any emotional involvement when they are hunting for a fling.

Home Sign In Search Date Ideas Join Forums Singles Groups - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!

2/16/2017 9:13:05 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	LIBERAL LOGIC 101.... kellyanne conway telling folks she's going shopping to buy some of ivanka trumps line of goods, ie...cool shoes, handbags, dresses....etc. is a threat to national security and an ethics violation. obama forcing us to purchase health care is totally cool! Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
2/16/2017 9:46:02 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Texas lawmakers are taking the longhorns to the bathroom crybullies, and it's freakin' AWESOME By: Nate Madden \| February 16, 2017 When it comes to taking on the LGBT lobby’s cultural cronies, officials in Texas are setting a new standard for conservative lawmakers, and going on the offensive against recent threats from the National Football League. It all began when legislators introduced SB 6, a state-level privacy bill that would dare violate and blaspheme the LGBT lobby’s latest commandment: “Thou shalt not leave bathroom safety policies up to private institutions.” Of course, the anticipated dragoons of artists and musicians deployed in an initial strike against the bill, as they have done countless other. But now the professional sports have gotten involved. The most pertinent development in the brewing Lonestar Bathroom Battle™ came when the NFL issued a statement saying that, if passed, the legislation might interfere with future Super Bowls in the state. "The NFL is walking on thin ice right here," Republican Governor Greg Abbott told Glenn Beck Tuesday. "The NFL needs to concentrate on playing football and get the heck out of politics." A day later, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick doubled down, going after NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell’s alleged hypocrisy on the issue: “The NFL embraces inclusiveness,” an NFL spokesman told the Houston Chronicle in an email last week. “We want all fans to feel welcomed at our events, and NFL policies prohibit discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or any other improper standard.” Of course, the NFL, its teams, its owners, and its vendors can embrace whatever bathroom policy they want at games and events. The Texas bill – just like its maligned and misrepresented sister in North Carolina – is written to give private institutions the freedom to do so. If the NFL wants to enforce that everyone in the stands be assigned a different set of restrooms every quarter and institute a free-for-all co-ed scenario during halftime at every Cowboys game, the state would have no recourse under the provisions of SB 6. These, however, are facts — “stubborn things” that should never be allowed to get in the way of a tear-jerking leftist narrative. Meanwhile, rather than wait out the inevitable storm, Patrick and Abbott are taking the fight to the cultural cronies themselves – disarming the playbook and pointing out the Left’s absurdity before it happens in full form. - See more at: https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/02/texas-lawmakers-are-taking-the-longhorns-to-the-bathroom-crybullies-and-its-freakin-awesome#sthash.Varl3WdM.dpuf
2/16/2017 9:55:42 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Former CIA Analyst: Yes, Former Obama Officials Were ‘Directly Involved’ In The Effort to Remove Flynn (And I'll Say Their Names) Matt Vespa Posted: Feb 15, 2017 8:16 PM Former CIA Analyst: Yes, Former Obama Officials Were ‘Directly Involved’ In The Effort to Remove Flynn (And I'll Say Their Names) The fallout from the resignation of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn is not over. We have Russia, leaks, and palace intrigue about former Obama administration officials laying the foundation to topple Flynn, who was knows for being staunchly opposed to the Iran nuclear deal. Guy wrote a post about the allegations. Flynn misled the vice president, which alone is an act that warrants being shown the door. Yet, multiple writers, namely Damon Linker at The Week and Eli Lake at Bloomberg have noted another sinister angle to this story, which is the number of leaks of highly sensitive information coming from this administration. It appears as if the intelligence community is willingly leaking intercepted phone calls with Trump officials (Flynn) to hamstring the administration from governing. Linker is no fan of Flynn, but added that dissatisfaction with an administration is handled through things called elections. It is not the job of the America’s spies to sabotage the governance of whatever administration may be in power. Lake added that this could be just the beginning—and that more heads could roll (Conway, Bannon, maybe even the president himself). Former CIA analyst and U.S. Army Reserve Lt. Col Tony Schaffer was pretty straightforward in his Fox Business appearance today, where he said that Obama officials were definitely behind the leaks—and even named a few of them (via Free Beacon): "Risk and Reward" host Deirdre Bolton asked Shaffer whether he thought leaks from the Obama administration were "the problem." "Absolutely," Shaffer answered, saying the Obama administration was "directly involved" with the leak. Shaffer said the blame lay "squarely at the feet of" the former CIA director John Brennan, former director of National Intelligence Jim Clapper, and former deputy national security advisor Ben Rhodes. Lt. Col Tony Schaffer Revels Who Was 'Directly Behind' Mike Flynn Phone Call Leaks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LaYu-RXB4hU https://youtu.be/LaYu-RXB4hU Schaffer added that Flynn was a smart guy and probably didn’t discuss the area about Russian sanctions in the manner that’s been portrayed by the Left because he knew those calls would be analyzed and reviewed somewhere down the road. He agreed that what Flynn said was probably no different than when President Obama said told then-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev would have more flexibility once the 2012 election was over, which was an example cited by Bolton. Schaffer noted that what Flynn said—when he called these various foreign officials—probably went along the lines of you’re going to deal with me, these are the issues on the table, and we might revisit them in the future. I agree that’s not necessarily illegal, but misleading the vice president by offering incomplete accounts of the conversations is an offense that could lead to one’s dismissal. This isn’t over. Democrats are clamoring for answers.
2/16/2017 10:58:16 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Students at a local college were assigned to read two books,"Titanic" and "My Life" by Bill Clinton. They were asked to do a book report and contrast the 2 books. One student turned in the following book report with the proposition that they were nearly identical stories! His professor gave him an A+ Titanic: Cost = $29.99 Clinton : Cost = $29.99 Titanic: Over 3 hours to read Clinton : Over 3 hours to read Titanic: The story of Jack and Rose, their forbidden love, and subsequent catastrophe. Clinton : The story of Bill and Monica, their forbidden love, and subsequent catastrophe Titanic: Jack is a starving artist. Clinton : Bill is a bullshit artist. Titanic: In one scene, Jack enjoys a good cigar. Clinton : Ditto for Bill Titanic: During the ordeal, Rose’s dress gets ruined. Clinton : Ditto for Monica's. Titanic: Jack teaches Rose to spit. Clinton : Let’s not go there. Titanic: Rose gets to keep her jewelry. Clinton : Monica is forced to return her gifts. Titanic: Rose remembers Jack for the rest of her life. Clinton : Clinton doesn’t remember anything. Titanic: Rose goes down on a vessel full of seamen. Clinton : Monica.. Ooh, let’s not go there, either. Titanic: Jack surrenders to an icy death. Clinton : Bill goes home to Hillary; basically the same thing.
2/16/2017 11:06:26 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Fmr. Obama Officials Launched Secret Campaign To Take Down Flynn by Staff Writer 9 · Published February 15, 2017 The Washington Free Beacon reported on Tuesday that sources in and out of the White House said that Michael Flynn’s sudden resignation from his position as national security advisor was the result of a months-long campaign set forth by the former members of the Obama administration to weaken President Donald Trump’s national security team in an effort to safeguard the Iran nuclear deal. According to the Free Beacon, the effort was led by a small group of Obama supporters, including former White House advisor Ben Rhodes, who provided the press with negative stories to undermine the credibility of Flynn, who is an avid opponent of the Iran Deal, in order to keep the Trump administration from disclosing the secret side deals the Obama administration made with Iran. Sources said that the efforts to set up such obstruction began months before Trump’s inauguration. American Military News spoke to Michael Krull, adjunct professor of politics at Georgetown University and executive at Resilient Corporation, about the matter. “Leaks from agencies comprising the US national security community are a serious issue and must be addressed immediately and effectively,” Krull told American Military News. “The National Security Council (NSC) is unlike most agencies of the US Government; it is a strange hybrid. It is the same in that it is staffed by career professionals and political appointees. It is dissimilar in that not all of the political appointees leave at the end of an administration, but continue in their roles. This provides important continuity to be sure, but it can also be a source of tension, competing loyalties and hidden agendas.” Krull told American Military News that the Obama administration’s long-standing issues with Flynn from his time at the Defense Intelligence Agency under President Obama played a role in the campaign to oust him from his new position in the Trump administration. “The Obama administration (CIA, NSC, etc.) had issues with Flynn, so he was relieved of his position at the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in 2014. That animosity did not go away,” Krull continued. “This reality, combined with standing up a new administrative structure within the NSC and the larger White House, did, in my view, color the events of the past few weeks. It seems to me that this is a problem not only in the NSC, but in other agencies as well, where former administration appointees have burrowed into career positions. The Trump administration will have to think through how best to deal with this and similar issues that will in all probability arise.” The Free Beacon first reported about the scheme back in January when Democrats actively worked to delay Mike Pompeo’s confirmation as CIA Director. Pompeo has been an outspoken critic about Iran and was one of the first to discover the Obama administration’s secret side deals made with the Islamic Republic in the nuclear deal. “It’s undeniable that the campaign to discredit Flynn was well underway before Inauguration Day, with a very troublesome and politicized series of leaks designed to undermine him,” one veteran national security adviser who has close ties to the White House team told the Free Beacon. “This pattern reminds me of the lead up to the Iran deal, and probably features the same cast of characters.” Before leaving office, the Obama administration hosted pro-Iranian figures at the White House through the final days before Trump took office. One of those figures was former Iranian government official and the head of the National Iranian American Council (NAIC). According to a source, it is members of the NIAC and other pro-Iranians that are celebrating Flynn’s resignation. “It’s actually Ben Rhodes, NIAC, and the Iranian mullahs who are celebrating today,” another source, who is a veteran foreign policy insider who is close to Flynn and the White House, told the Free Beacon. “They know that the number one target is Iran … [and] they all knew their little sacred agreement with Iran was going to go off the books. So they got rid of Flynn before any of the [secret] agreements even surfaced.”
2/16/2017 11:18:31 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Resistance: Democrats Plan to Withhold Federal Taxes to Protest Trump by Ben Kew 15 Feb 2017 Mia Farrow Verified account ?@MiaFarrow I refuse to pay a penny of my taxes toward Trump's insane, insulting wall. #IstandwithMexico Some Democrats prepare to withhold paying federal taxes in potentially the biggest tax boycott since the Vietnam War, according to a report from The Guardian. The National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee (NWTRCC), which campaigns for federal tax boycotts, says there has “renewed interest in war tax resistance following Trump’s inauguration,” with the website’s traffic doubling in the past month. “Something has clicked in the minds of thousands of people across the country… we don’t want to pay for Trump’s agenda! While many of the reasons people are fed up—extreme militarism, mass incarceration, police brutality, and mass deportations—are part of the foundation of our country, it is exciting to see many new people contacting NWTRCC and wanting to organize in their communities,” the website reads. The boycott has also attracted the interest of celebrities, with Mia Farrow saying “I refuse to pay a penny of my taxes toward Trump’s insane, insulting wall.” Feminist activist Gloria Steinhem also pledges her support, telling The Guardian that she will deduct from her tax return money she believes should be going to Planned Parenthood. In December, Time magazine published a column entitled “65 Million Americans Should Threaten to Not Pay Taxes,” urging the “approximately 65 million Democrats who voted for Hillary Clinton [to] pledge that in the future if a Republican wins the presidency with fewer votes than a Democrat for the third time in our era, we won’t pay taxes to the federal government.” California Democrats have already threatened to “cut off the feds” by withholding taxes, with former State Assembly Speaker Willie Brown claiming the state could become “an organized non-payer,” in a state of “non-compliance with the federal tax code.” Before the election, dozens of celebrities promised to effectively boycott America by leaving the country should Donald Trump be elected. The list included singers Barbara Streisand and Miley Cyrus, the actor Bryan Cranston and the comedienne Amy Schumer. Since his election, none of their plans have materialized. another good reason to withhold federal funding to ALL looneyliberal cities and states and fun and games like the 'arts', pp....etc also increase prosecution for non tax payers, ie. al thesharptonguedidiot, etc...... imagine if average citizen refused to fund the obummerscare...oh wait, we were assessed a 'fine' a 'tax' a 'penalty' [Edited 2/16/2017 11:20:37 AM ]
2/16/2017 11:22:34 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
2/16/2017 11:27:21 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	If you think Obama was a liberal you are mistaken. He was a corporatist just like Hillary. He baited race to get the black support, all the while screwing them and the middle class. Definitely a DINO.
2/16/2017 11:40:10 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
2/16/2017 11:43:56 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	So Clarity, what is your definition of a liberal? And for crying out loud adjust your memes so they don't eff up the page. [Edited 2/16/2017 11:46:58 AM ]
2/16/2017 12:53:15 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Melania Trump says popular White House tours will resume in March Maria Puente , USA TODAY Published 1:34 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2017 \| Updated 3:54 p.m. ET Feb. 14, 2017 White House reopens for tours in March aft... The White House is reopening for tours on March 7th! Rob Smith (@robsmithonline) has all the details. Buzz60 First lady Melania Trump said Tuesday the always-popular free public tours of the White House will resume in three weeks, on March 7. The tours had been suspended during the transition to the Trump administration, but the suspension has lasted longer than usual. That provoked some dismay in Congress, where members were questioning what was taking so long, including U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, who tweeted about it Sunday. ChuckGrassley ? @ChuckGrassley Whoever monitors twitter at WH for businessman president Trump "when is WH going to be opened for public tours?" Mrs G wants to know 9:57 AM - 12 Feb 2017 Later, Grassley tweeted his thanks. ChuckGrassley ? @ChuckGrassley Mrs G appreciates WH responding 2my Twitter WH will open for public tours starting March 7 Im positive distraught Iowans will be very happy2 12:21 PM - 14 Feb 2017 The delay is in part because Mrs. Trump has not fully assembled her East Wing staff who help oversee the program under which ordinary Americans can get a look at some of the public rooms of the People's House. "The delay is in part because..."....i wonder...if 'part' of the delay was because it has taken so long to clean up and fumigate???i know! i know! that was mean "I am excited to reopen the White House to the hundreds of thousands of visitors who come each year," Trump said in a statement issued by the office of the White House press secretary Sean Spicer. Mrs. Trump, who is not scheduled to move into the White House until June, has not yet appointed her own press secretary. But she has appointed Lindsay Reynolds as her chief of staff, and Reynolds served under former President George W. Bush as associate director of the White House Visitors Office. "The White House is a remarkable and historic site and we are excited to share its beauty and history," Mrs. Trump said in her statement. "I am committed to the restoration and preservation of our nation's most recognizable landmark. " Tourists take pictures in the Blue Room of the White House July 1, 2015, after the 40-year-old ban on camera and photo use on public tours was lifted. Public tours of the White House are free of charge and first-come, first-serve. A limited number of spaces are available and tickets must be requested through a member of Congress, usually one's personal congressional representative. The tours are self-guided, generally running from 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. Tuesday through Thursday, 7:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Fridays and Saturdays (excluding Federal holidays or unless otherwise noted). Tour hours will be extended when possible based on the official White House schedule. Visitors are encouraged to submit requests as early as possible. Tickets can be requested up to three months in advance and must be submitted no less than 21 days in advance. In 2015, the Obama administration lifted the 40-year ban on cameras and photos on public tours. Guests are now welcome to take photos throughout the White House tour route and are even encouraged to share their photos using the hashtag #WhiteHouseTour. Phones and compact still cameras with a lens no longer than 3 inches are allowed
2/16/2017 1:23:28 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	BREAKING – Congress Moves to STOP Obama’s Treasonous Coup Attempt Against Trump FINALLY, someone is asking the one question that demands an immediate answer! Will we get an honest one, detailing a legal reason behind all the surveillance shenanigans? Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), said, “I expect for the FBI to tell me what is going on, and they better have a good answer,” via Washington Post. Representative Nunes also said he was troubled by the leaking of the Flynn recordings. He pointed out a complex process exists for the monitoring and recording of communications of United States citizens and the “unmasking” of such conversations for intelligence agency use. Committee members believe the most important question raised by retired General Michael Flynn’s resignation as national security adviser centers around why the eavesdropping on his calls by the NSA or FBI was even launched — and then leaked to the news media! “The real story here is why are there so many illegal leaks coming out of Washington? Will these leaks be happening as I deal on N.Korea etc?” tweeted President Donald Trump. Nunes was absolutely correct when stating the “big problem” with the entire issue, which the media are trying to turn into a scandal, is that a private American citizen, which Flynn was at the time, should never have had his phone calls monitored and recorded by the federal government. The California Republican called out the Democrats as hypocrites on the Flynn issue. All the liberals screamed over privacy issues when Hillary Clinton’s emails were demanded by the FBI, but they are totally silent now even though Clinton was under investigation and Flynn was not! President Trump appears dismayed. During a press conference earlier today, he called Flynn a “wonderful man” who did not deserve to have his career destroyed by leaks. Representative Trey Gowdy also noted the illegality of exposing classified information. Liberal television pundits continued to run sensational headlines about the whole Michael Flynn issue, even alleging collusion between the Trump administration and Russia. They do this with zero proof, which many eventually and begrudgingly admit in their fake news articles. If you did not actually read the entire stories or only got your news from mainstream media outlets, you WOULD think the decorated veteran had actually promised to ease Obama’s imposed sanctions on Russia after Trump took the oath of office. That was not the case as far as the actual evidence shows. When Flynn spoke with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, he relayed his appreciation for the country not overreacting to the poke in the eye from the lame duck president. When asked by Kislyak specifically about lifting the sanctions in the future, Flynn merely said Donald Trump would soon take office and would be reviewing the situation.
2/16/2017 1:36:09 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	i dont care what the annual cost of illegal immigration is we cannot afford it anymore. any way you look at it, its cheaper to build the wall in the long run.
2/16/2017 3:32:08 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	APPROVAL POPS TO 55% 'I INHERITED A MESS' TRUMP EATS THE PRESS
2/16/2017 3:33:45 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	If he doesn't curb H-1B visa abuse he is full of shit. I'm still waiting and so are many Americans in the IT industry.
2/16/2017 6:00:57 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
louie6332 Falkville, AL 75, joined Nov. 2011 online now!	Nole, you say to Carity: “If you think Obama was a liberal you are mistaken. So Clarity, what is your definition of a liberal?” I’ll take the question. First, the definition of Liberalism: Liberalism, fundamentally and by definition, seeks to liberate itself from all that binds: from right reason, from law, any law that does not somehow stem from oneself, from truth, any truth that must be sought outside oneself to be found. The Liberal makes up his own “truth” in his own mind and does not seek to bring his beliefs into compliance with objective truth that must be sought outside oneself to be found, he believes what he wants to believe because he wants to believe it and for no other reason, he is the master of truth, not the other way around. And Liberals are especially repelled by God’s law and God’s revelation (divine revelation) because they find the very thought of submitting themselves to God to be abhorrent (after all, they are their own gods, and one God, in their minds, cannot tell another god what to do. Liberals are their own gods, and they will have no other gods before them. Liberals are not men of good will. For men and women of good will love truth and will follow it wherever it leads. Truth is their master. Between Men of Good Will and Liberals is a chasm that is so wide and deep that it cannot be crossed. The two are inherently incompatible. Saint Paul put it this way: “What fellowship does light have with darkness, what fellowship does truth have with falsehoods? Men of Good Will tend to recognize one another and to feel a kinship with one another. Is today’s Democratic Party Liberal? Well, some years ago, the Communist Party USA realized that the majority of Americans would never accept Communism or vote the Party into power. But they came to realize that Americans WOULD accept Communism under the guise of “Liberalism” and “Progressivism”. So they infiltrated the Democratic Party, took control of its leadership, and threw its support behind the infiltrated Democratic Party. The leaders of the Democratic Party today are members of the Communist Internationale. And today, Democrats, far and wide, wittingly or unwittingly, march in union with the Communists under the banner of Liberalism and Progressivism. Was Obama Liberal? Obama was, and is, a God hating, Israel hating, America hating, lying, homosexual, Allah loving, Muslim, a Kenyan born illegal alien Illuminati post turtle, Prince Hall Freemason and Illuminati puppet, who was installed by the Satan worshiping Illuminati with the mission of bringing American down from within and then turning American sovereignty over to a One World socialist Government controlled by Illuminati elites by the end of his term. And the Satan worshiping witch Hillary Clinton was their choice for completing the mission if Obama failed to accomplish it during his term. President Trump is not a member of a secret society so the Illuminati have no control over him, so they are currently in a state of total panic. Freemasonry forms am unseen government within the government controlled by the hidden hand of Freemasonry. And the American people will never get their government back unless they stop electing Freemasons to power. They have done this with President Trump. And, if given enough time, he will overthrow the New World Order Illuminati who have enslaved the American people for so long. Please pray that God bless, guide, and protect, President Donald Trump, our president, the president of the majority of the American people, that he may make America Great Again. Louie
2/16/2017 6:51:42 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
cafe_express Mobile, AL 84, joined Mar. 2013	Statement on Stream Protection Rule CRA Signed into Law WASHINGTON—House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) released the following statement after President Trump signed H.J. Res. 38 into law. This legislation repeals the Department of Interior’s stream protection rule under the Congressional Review Act. “Today, we delivered on another promise. The Department of Interior’s stream protection rule—which is now repealed—could have wiped out one-third of American coal mining jobs. Coal country will finally receive relief from the Obama administration’s eight-year war on affordable energy. This regulatory reprieve is just the beginning. Congress will continue to stand up for American workers by abolishing harmful regulations and revitalizing our economy.”
2/17/2017 8:56:37 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Venezuela Orders CNN to Be Taken Off the Air immediately, Accusing It Of ‘Misrepresentation and Distorting the Truth’ By: bnonews The Venezuelan government has ordered CNN en Español to be taken off the air immediately, accusing the Spanish-language network of misrepresenting the truth against the country’s government. Venezuela’s National Commission of Telecommunications (Conatel) announced its decision on Wednesday, just days after CNN aired a report that angered the government. Viewers in Venezuela reported that the signal of CNN en Español could no longer be received. Although the government did not point to a specific incident, a statement from Conatel accused CNN of misrepresenting and distorting the truth to undermine the country’s government. As such, the agency has ordered the immediate suspension of CNN en Español. The statement did not specify whether the suspension is temporary or permanent. Wednesday’s announcement came just days after CNN en Español reported on allegations that the Venezuelan Embassy in Iraq had sold passports and visas for thousands of dollars, including to people with alleged ties to terrorism. CNN said its reporting was the result of a year-long investigation. The Venezuelan government has denied CNN’s reporting. President Nicolás Maduro, speaking on Sunday, expressed his desire for CNN to be “well away from here”, stating that media outlets such as CNN were ‘manipulating information’. CNN has released the following statement: “At CNN en Español we believe in the vital role that freedom of press plays in a healthy democracy. Today the government of Venezuela pulled our television signal, denying Venezuelans news and information from our television network, which they have relied upon for 20 years. CNN en Español will continue to fulfill its responsibility to the Venezuelan public by offering our live signal on YouTube free of charge and news links on CNNEspanol.com, so they may have access to information not available to them in any other way. This happens days after we aired our investigation “Passports in the Shadows” which revealed that Venezuelan authorities may have issued passports and visas to people with ties to terrorism. CNN stands by our network’s reporting and our commitment to truth and transparency.” CNN en Español kicked off air in Venezuela By Steve Almasy, CNN Updated 12:15 PM ET, Thu February 16, 2017 CNN en Español kicked off air in Venezuela CNN investigation revealed Venezuelan authorities may have given passports to people tied to terrorism Venezuela government says the reports are "an absolute lie" (CNN)The Venezuelan government Wednesday ordered cable providers to take CNN en Español off the air, days after CNN aired an investigation into the alleged fraudulent issuing of Venezuelan passports and visas. The network "instigates religious, racial and political hatred," violence and other themes, National Telecommunications Commission Director Andres Eloy Mendez said Thursday morning on state-run VTV. The commission told cable companies to pull CNN en Español's signal immediately. It called the action a preventative measure and did not say when CNN en Español would be back on cable systems. Mendez told VTV that the decision is connected to "the constitutional and human guarantees of all citizens." He read a statement in which he said CNN's reports "defame and distort the truth" and "threaten the peace and democratic stability of our Venezuelan nation, as they generate a climate of intolerance." Foreign Minister Delcy Rodríguez accused CNN of performing what she defined as an "imperialistic media operation" against her country in last week's broadcast of the yearlong investigation. The opposition-controlled National Assembly condemned the commission's decision as anti-democratic. It "gravely affects the human right Venezuelans have to be informed," the legislative body said in a statement. CNN and CNN en Español's investigation, "Passports in the Shadows," uncovered serious irregularities in the issuing of Venezuelan passports and visas, including allegations that passports were given to people with ties to terrorism. The story, which began airing last week on both networks, revealed a confidential intelligence document that links Venezuelan Vice President Tareck El Aissami to 173 Venezuelan passports and IDs issued to individuals from the Middle East, including people connected to the terrorist group Hezbollah. The two-part report threatened "the peace and democratic stability of our Venezuelan people since they generate an environment of intolerance," the government said. El Aissami has not responded to multiple requests for comment over several months. Rodríguez said the investigation is "an absolute lie." CNN en Español released a statement after the government's action. "At CNN en Español we believe in the vital role that freedom of press plays in a healthy democracy," the network said through a spokesperson. "Today the government of Venezuela pulled our television signal, denying Venezuelans news and information from our television network, which they have relied upon for 20 years. "CNN en Español will continue to fulfill its responsibility to the Venezuelan public by offering our live signal on YouTube free of charge and news links on CNNEspanol.com, so they may have access to information not available to them in any other way. "This happens days after we aired our investigation 'Passports in the Shadows' which revealed that Venezuelan authorities may have issued passports and visas to people with ties to terrorism. "CNN stands by our network's reporting and our commitment to truth and transparency." Another one of Turner Broadcasting System's cable networks, CNN International, still is being telecast in Venezuela. The move by the Venezuelan government comes just two days after US authorities said El Aissami is an international drug trafficker and slapped severe sanctions on him. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro denounced the allegations made by the US Treasury Department. Maduro called the US charges "an aggression which Venezuela will respond to step by step, with balance and forcefulness." CNN's Flora Charner contributed to this report.
2/17/2017 9:07:11 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	fox is quickly picking up the pace with the fake news industry....
2/17/2017 9:24:55 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	The adoption process only takes a few minutes!
2/17/2017 9:41:32 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
2/17/2017 10:05:18 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
2/17/2017 10:07:50 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	@Louie. By your needlessly wordy definition of a liberal you call a lot of people liberals who don't meet that definition. In many cases that makes you a liberal because you define your own truth regardless of the facts. I don't call myself a liberal because it means too many things to too many people. For instance what do you think when you hear the term "neo liberalism"? It probably doesn't mean what you think it means. For too many who fall into Louie's category, the term "liberal" just means anyone who isn't a religious right fanatic. But the term "religious right" is kind of an oxymoron. The bible is full of references about the rich and they are not complimentary references. It is full of references about greed and not very complimentary towards that attribute as well. As a matter of fact, the Bible gives a virtual employers guide on how to treat your employees in Isaiah chapter 58 that the "religious right" conveniently ignores. In essence, the "religious right" are really a self deluded and pious bunch of people who simply cherry pick the bible to satisfy their own political leanings and the ruling class corporatists see them as useful idiots. So, the corporatists and their sock puppets like Hannity, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, etc., give the religious right wingnuts a word they can throw at people who disagree with them. That word is "liberal". Doesn't really have a concrete definition so because of the vagueness of the word it's easy to sling around and use it for whatever purpose suits them. A true Christian does not cherry pick the Bible like the religious right does. And when you take the Bible as a whole you come out with some very different opinions than what the religious right have. Something not too very different from Harry Truman. [Edited 2/17/2017 10:09:34 AM ]
2/17/2017 10:34:40 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Trump administration DENIES it's considering mobilizing up to 100,000 National Guard troops to round up illegal aliens – but White House source says it 'has been discussed' Proposal reportedly making the rounds at the Department of Homeland Security would identify 11 immigrant-heavy states and ask them to mobilize troops Governors would have an opt-out privilege, but the total number of National Guardsmen and women could approach 100,000 White House press secretary Sean Spicer says an 11-page draft seen by The Associated Press 'is not a White House document' Spicer insists the AP report that the plan is under consideration 'is 100 per cent not true. It is false. It is irresponsible to be saying this' A White House aide confirms to DailyMail.com that the idea 'has been discussed' but wouldn't say if it has been recommended to President Donald Trump The potential aim would be to hasten the removal of 'criminal aliens' like those Trump railed against on the campaign trail An executive order he signed this month greatly expands that group and may include people whose only 'crime' was sneaking across the border By David Martosko, Us Political Editor For Dailymail.com and Associated Press PUBLISHED: 10:23 EST, 17 February 2017 \| UPDATED: 11:19 EST, 17 February 2017 White House press secretary Sean Spicer forcefully denied on Friday that the Trump administration is considering a proposal to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up illegal immigrants, including millions living nowhere near the Mexico border. 'That is 100 per cent not true. It is false. It is irresponsible to be saying this,' Spicer told reporters aboard the Marine One helicopter. 'There is no effort at all to round up, to utilize the National Guard to round up illegal immigrants.' An 11-page document seen by The Associated Press calls for the unprecedented militarization of immigration enforcement as far north as Portland, Oregon, and as far east as New Orleans, Louisiana. Spicer insisted that 'It is not a White House document' but didn't address whether it may have come from the Department of Homeland Security. He also conceded that 'I don't know what could potentially be out there' but added that 'I know that there is no effort to do what is potentially suggested.' Trump's spokesman did not say the idea hasn't been considered. A White House aide confirmed to DailyMail.com Friday morning that the idea 'has been discussed,' but wouldn't say whether a plan has been formalized or recommended to the president. A proposal making the rounds at President Donald Trump's Department of Homeland Security would identify 11 immigrant-heavy states and ask them to mobilize troops to remove illegal immigrants National Guardsmen and women could be pressed into service to round up border-jumpers in their own communities if a draft memo were to become Trump administration policy Immigration protesters are already drawing battle lines against the Trump White House as they fear deportations that would focus only on some parts of existing family units DailyMail.com's White House source said the idea is to hasten the removal from the U.S. of 'criminal aliens' like those Trump railed against during one campaign stop after another last year. An executive order the president has signed greatly expands that group and may include people whose only 'crime' was sneaking across the border. Spicer tweeted before boarding Air Force One on Friday that the AP report 'is not true. DHS also confirms it is 100% false.' He was responding to an Associated Press tweet that said the draft memo 'shows Trump considering mobilizing the National Guard.' A Department of Homeland Security spokesman told DailyMail.com and other outlets on Friday: 'It's incorrect. The Department is not considering mobilizing the National Guard for immigration enforcement.' Separately, a DHS official said: 'The report referenced by the AP was a very early, pre-decisional draft that never made it to the secretary and was never seriously considered by the Department.' But the AP reported Friday that '[t]he draft document has circulated among DHS staff over the last two weeks. As recently as Friday, staffers in several different offices reported discussions were underway.' White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer denied the report forcefully, calling it 'false' and the AP 'irresponsible' President Trump's spokesman tweeted that the AP's story is 'not true' and said the Department of Homeland Security has denied it as well Four states that border on Mexico are reportedly included in the proposal – California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas – but it also encompasses seven states contiguous to those four: Oregon, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana. Governors in the 11 states would have a choice whether to have their guard troops participate, according to the memo, written by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, a retired four-star Marine general. While National Guard personnel have been used to assist with immigration-related missions on the U.S.-Mexico border before, they have never been used as broadly or as far north. The memo is addressed to the then-acting heads of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. It would serve as guidance to implement the wide-ranging executive order on immigration and border security that President Donald Trump signed Jan. 25. Such memos are routinely issued to supplement executive orders. Also dated Jan. 25, the draft memo says participating troops would be authorized 'to perform the functions of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension and detention of aliens in the United States.' It describes how the troops would be activated under a revived state-federal partnership program, and states that personnel would be authorized to conduct searches and identify and arrest any illegal immigrants. The AP's requests to the White House and the Department of Homeland Security for comment and a status report on the proposal were not answered before it published its report. Trump tweeted last weekend that removing 'illegal criminals' is in line with campaign promises he made repeatedly last year Trump tweeted last weekend that removing 'illegal criminals' is in line with campaign promises he made repeatedly last year Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4235164/Trump-weighs-mobilizing-Nat-Guard-immigration-roundups.html#ixzz4YxcF38bo
2/17/2017 10:41:48 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	The illegal aliens is a problem for sure, but getting rid of them won't help the middle class that much. It will help the working poor by raising wages for crap jobs, but will have little impact on the middle class. And we actually need a lot of those migrant farm workers to work the fields and harvest crops. What WILL help the middle class tremendously is eliminating or severely curtailing the use of H-1B visas. Those are the foreigners that ARE taking the good jobs away from Americans. We also need to kick out those contracting firms owned by foreigners. It's because of them that companies no longer offer permanent positions to American IT workers.
2/17/2017 11:41:14 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
2/17/2017 12:27:25 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	It Has Begun, Tillerson Fires Most of the 7th Floor By S. Noble - February 17, 2017 The infamous 7th floor Americans were stunned to learn of the State Department rogue Shadow Government which operated in secret from the 7th floor. They were behind the corrupt handling of the Clinton documents. CBS News announced that Rex Tillerson, the new Secretary of State, fired most of the 7th floor policy makers who so famously called themselves the “shadow government”. Policy will be controlled by the White House, not professional diplomats, CBS stated. CBS bemoans the loss of the shadow government’s policy-making expertise. In October of last year, a NY Post story reported that the coterie of State Department officials who called themselves the “shadow government” controlled the release of the Clinton emails. Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy even offered the FBI a quid pro quo for changing the classification of the Clinton emails. Kennedy asked assistance in altering the email’s classification in exchange for a ‘quid pro quo,’?” an FBI summary says. “In exchange for marking the email unclassified, State would reciprocate by allowing the FBI to place more agents in countries where they were presently forbidden.” That’s a promise to help alter US policy in order to make it seem like Clinton hadn’t casually endangered national security. It gets worse. Raymond Maxwell Former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell told the House Select Committee on Benghazi that Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to the Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya, Sharyl Attkisson reported. Maxwell says the operation was a weekend document session that was held in the basement of the State Department’s Foggy Bottom headquarters in a room underneath the “jogger’s entrance.” When he got to the room, he faced boxes of documents and a State Department office director whom Maxwell described as close to Clinton’s top advisers. “She told me, ‘Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light,’” says Maxwell. He says “seventh floor” was State Department shorthand for then-Secretary of State Clinton and her principal advisers. “I asked her, ‘But isn’t that unethical?’ She responded, ‘Ray, those are our orders.’ ” Two other high-ranking State Department officials and confidants of Clinton’s entered and stayed for a brief time. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, named the two Hillary Clinton confidants who allegedly were present: One was Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff and a former White House counsel who defended President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial. The other, Chaffetz said, was Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan, who previously worked on Hillary Clinton’s and then Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns.
2/17/2017 12:46:26 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	ICE: Raid reports fake news, Obama grabbed 350% more By PAUL BEDARD (@SECRETSBEDARD) • 2/17/17 8:43 AM ICE: Raid reports fake news, Obama grabbed 350% more Washington Examiner U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is pushing back hard on media reports that President Trump has unleashed a mean-spirited national raid on immigrants, noting that it rounded up over 350 percent more during one sweep under former President Obama. In a series of tweets, ICE called the reports, in the Washington Post and elsewhere, "dangerous and irresponsible." The agency this week said that had made 683 arrests of mostly criminal illegal immigrants, or those with multiple cases against them beyond illegally crossing the border. Stay abreast of the latest developments from nation's capital and beyond with curated News Alerts from the Washington Examiner news desk and delivered to your inbox. To make its point, ICE tweeted out a "Throwback Thursday" story from 2012 during which 3,168 illegals were rounded up in a sweep that drew little media complaints and coverage. In a series of tweets, ICE hit the coverage and pro-immigration groups: "Reports of ICE checkpoints and sweeps or "roundups" are false, dangerous and irresponsible," said one. Also from the Washington Examiner Boeing loves the Export-Import Bank, but Boeing doesn't need the Export-Import Bank By Timothy P. Carney • 02/17/17 1:32 PM "These reports create mass panic and put communities and law enforcement personnel in unnecessary danger," said another. "Any groups falsely reporting such activities are doing a disservice to those they claim to support," added a third.
2/17/2017 1:01:37 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	CBS Anchor: The Press Ruined Its Own Reputation Cortney O'Brien Posted: Feb 17, 2017 10:00 AM CBS Anchor: The Press Ruined Its Own Reputation President Trump told the media at his entertaining press conference on Thursday that the American people simply don't trust them anymore. Reporters' first instinct would likely be to get defensive, but CBS anchor and "Face the Nation" host John Dckerson found himself agreeing with the president. In an interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt on Friday, Dckerson acknowledged that the blame for Americans' lost faith in the media belongs to the Fourth Estate. Hewitt noted that Trump is guilty of obvious misstatements, such as his claiming on Friday that he had the biggest electoral college win since President Reagan, which was quickly fact checked. Yet, his assumption that people mistrust the press is 100 percent accurate, Hewitt argued, because "Manhattan-Beltway elites have lost the country." Dckerson agreed. "Well, yes," he said. "I mean, yes, it’s true, and it’s not because of anything obviously Donald Trump did. The press did all that good work ruining its reputation on its own, and we can have a long conversation about what created that. Part of it, though, is what you mentioned about the local weather report, which is to say a lot of hysterical coverage about every little last thing that doesn’t warrant it. Having said that, it doesn’t mean, and in fact, it most explicitly does not mean that the press just throws out the standards." If only CNN's Jim Acosta could take note of Dckerson's self-reflection. On Wednesday, when President Trump held a joint press conference with visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and called on two conservative-leaning outlets (including Townhall) over more mainstream outlets, Acosta whined to his colleagues that the "fix was in." Never mind the fact that the questions asked were fair and relevant. CNN's reaction gave off an arrogance that Americans have come to loathe. In a recent Gallup poll, only 32 percent said they have a great deal of or a fair amount of trust in the media. As the president suggested on Thursday, if the mainstream media tries reporting the truth and quits obsessing over undermining him, they'll see their ratings begin to rise.
2/17/2017 1:49:50 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008
2/17/2017 2:43:04 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	WikiLeaks Ties Hillary’s Campaign To Russia, Not Trump’s By Proud Conservative Posted on February 17, 2017 Hillary and her liberal puppet media have been slamming Trump for months about his alleged ties to Vladimir Putin, but what was just revealed by WikiLeaks proves that Hillary’s campaign is in fact the ones with ties to Putin. Hillary’s campaign chair, John Podesta, has been the subject of daily email leaks by Julian Assange and one leak ties Podesta directly to an energy company called Joule Unlimited, which has received millions from a Putin-connected Russian government fund. Specifically, 75,000 shares of Joule Unlimited stock has been transferred to John Podesta’s daughter, Megan Rouse. From Breitbart: “Full transfer request, with Megan’s signature attached,” Podesta’s assistant Eryn Sepp wrote to him. A January 3, 2014 letter revealed that Podesta designated his daughter’s Dublin, California residence as the address for Leonidio Holdings LLC, the Delaware-based holding company that Podesta used to transfer his shares in Russian-related Joule Global Holdings. Rouse is listed as “managing member” of Leonidio Holdings LLC, according to financial documents. Podesta’s membership on the board of directors of Joule Unlimited was first revealed in research from Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large and Government Accountability Institute (GAI) President Peter Schweizer. The GAI report, tilted, “From Russia with Money: Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset, and Cronyism,” reported that Podesta joined the Joule Unlimited board in June 2011. “Two months after Podesta joined the board, Vladimir Putin’s Rusnano announced that it would invest up to one billion rubles into Joule Unlimited, which amounts to $35 million. That represents one-fifth of the entire amount of investment dollars Joule collected from 2007 to 2013,” the GAI report concludes. As Breitbart News previously reported, Sepp forwarded a message concerning the Joule shares to Podesta from Mark C. Solakian, who was Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Joule Unlimited Technologies, Inc. “It is my understanding that John transferred the resulting 75,000 common shares from the option exercise to the Leonidio LLC.,” Slovakian wrote in a January 2014 email. “As such, we would need to edit the Transfer of Share Agreement to reflect the transfer of 75,000 common shares to the LLC.” Podesta also failed to disclose fully his position on Joule Unlimited’s board of directors and to include it in his federal financial disclosures, as required by law, before he became President Barack Obama’s senior adviser in January 2014. So there you have it, folks. Hillary’s camp is the one with Russian ties, not Trump’s.
2/17/2017 2:55:56 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
beanhammer Denton, TX 52, joined Jun. 2014	Quote from nuffan: KKK was founded by Dixiecrats and there was nothing liberal at all about Dixiecrats... Dixicrats are democrats
2/17/2017 3:06:18 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Quote from beanhammer: Dixicrats are democrats dixiecrats:A former political party(States Rights Democratic Party) in the United States; formed in 1948 by Democrats from southern states in order to oppose to the candidacy of Harry S Truman
2/17/2017 3:13:20 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nuffan Kennesaw, GA 54, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from beanhammer: Dixicrats are democrats Yes they were...but they were not today's liberal democrats... They were conservative anti-federalist... And comparing today's democrat to the Dixiecrat's that fought civil rights is ridiculous... [Edited 2/17/2017 3:14:31 PM ]
2/17/2017 3:13:33 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
beanhammer Denton, TX 52, joined Jun. 2014	Quote from clarity101: dixiecrats:A former political party(States Rights Democratic Party) in the United States; formed in 1948 by Democrats from southern states in order to oppose to the candidacy of Harry S Truman Thank you clarity you always Provide the info that shuts their mouth
2/17/2017 3:15:32 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nuffan Kennesaw, GA 54, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from beanhammer: Thank you clarity you always Provide the info that shuts their mouth Yes the south that is DARK RED REPUBLICAN today... [Edited 2/17/2017 3:16:18 PM ]
2/17/2017 3:28:47 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
beanhammer Denton, TX 52, joined Jun. 2014	Quote from nuffan: Yes the south that is DARK RED REPUBLICAN today... Fact. it is the older democrats That are racist here today.
2/17/2017 3:33:40 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	The party's used to be different. Now the only difference is one claims to be politically correct and the other panders to those who aren't crazy about political correctness. Both parties have been taken over by the corporatists for some time. That's a big part of why Hillary lost. People no longer can see a difference between the two. The democrat party hardly resembles the democrat party of the 1930's thru the 1970's. We need to vote based on the individual and not the party. Both party's as a whole, suck.
2/17/2017 3:45:53 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
beanhammer Denton, TX 52, joined Jun. 2014	It was so much fun during The first obama run watching My hunting family argue around The campfire. Brothers against brothers and Fathers against sons. Democrats for generations. " iam not voting for no n*****" "So you would rather vote For a republican than vote for A black democrat you are A trader to the democratic party". I just set back and laughed. Another democratic quote. "I am a booth man"
2/17/2017 3:49:30 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	White House removes six staffers after failing FBI background checks: BY ELIZABETH ELIZALDE NEW YORK DAILY NEWS Thursday, February 16, 2017, 7:27 PM Several White House staffers were given the boot Thursday because they didn’t pass FBI background checks, according to a report. Sources familiar with the matter told Politico that six employees were escorted from the White House by security because they failed to pass the SF86, a Questionnaire for National Security Positions used for security clearances. Among those shown the door was Caroline Wiles, President Trump’s director of scheduling. She’s the daughter of Susan Wiles, Trump’s Florida campaign director and ex-chief of staff for Gov. Rick Scott (R-Fla.). Caroline Wiles will reportedly work for the Treasury Department instead, sources told Politico. Congress must probe Trump's denials on Russia The reported dismissals come during a turbulent week for the Trump administration. Several White House staffers were escorted out by security after failing to pass FBI background checks, according to a report. (JOSHUA ROBERTS/REUTERS) Embattled ex-national security adviser Michael Flynn was fired Monday night after he admitted he misled senior White House officials, including Vice President Pence, over conversations he had with the Russian ambassador to the U.S. about sanctions imposed by the Obama administration. After that, Labor Secretary nominee, fast food CEO Andrew Puzder, withdrew his name from consideration Wednesday after allegations of spousal abuse cost him Republican support. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 6 Staffers Escorted From White House After SICK ‘High Risk’ Threat They All Had In Common Was Discovered: The White House was rocked with controversy this week after the truth about six staffers came out along with the one horrifying thing they all had in common which they had been hiding since they were each hired. Now the President’s office is on high alert for good reason after six staffers were just escorted off the premises and concern over the damage that’s potentially been done is now under investigation. It’s no easy task to get on staff in a “high-risk” position in the White House, working for and around the most powerful man in the world. Of increased concern, is that President Trump is one of the most controversial Commander-in-Chiefs our country has ever had. He walks around every second of every day with a target on his back from lunatic leftists, which leaves the nation to wonder who these six particular staffers were given top clearance when they never should have been on the property in the first place. Somehow, these six workers surpassed all the red tape of top government clearance to get into their positions at the White House and when these background checks were completed retroactively, they all revealed something terrifying. All of those who were investigated had “problems with their SF86 application, the ‘Questionnaire for National Security Positions’,” meaning, the failed the background checks after working there for weeks, Western Journalism reported. This means that this crucial background check, which is a n extensive 127-page document that includes questions on the applicant’s credit score, medical records, employment history, family history, substance use and other personal subjects, was never conducted. Essentially, these people could have been anyone with ties to any damning thing, but worked daily around the president without anyone really knowing who they were. Trump’s director of scheduling and the daughter of his Florida campaign manager, Caroline Wiles, is one of the staffers who was escorted from the White House. However, she apparently knew it was coming since she resigned before from her position, which seemingly saved her career since she’s now being reappointed to the Treasury Department, presumably after completion of the background check, sources told Politico. Trump’s detractors immediately used this to slander him and his capabilities as the leader. However, they are quick to forget that just last week is was discovered that Barack Obama had put traitors and terrorists, including Muslim spy ring in place that put American’s information and lives at risk. While this staff situation was an alarming oversight, the people in these positions were nowhere near as dangerous as those on the former staff, including Obama himself who left the White House without a lot a background questions of his own being answered. apparently all these 'staffers' had connections to the previous administration. ill be continuing my research on these 'staffers'...
2/17/2017 4:05:19 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Quote from nole_89: The party's used to be different. Now the only difference is one claims to be politically correct and the other panders to those who aren't crazy about political correctness. Both parties have been taken over by the corporatists for some time. That's a big part of why Hillary lost. People no longer can see a difference between the two. The democrat party hardly resembles the democrat party of the 1930's thru the 1970's. We need to vote based on the individual and not the party. Both party's as a whole, suck. i agree and disagree with much of what you posted... imo....you also are wearing the '2party' blinders. yes, most folks do vote repub or dimdumdem. and accordingly, each 'party' comprises of nearly a 50/50 split. but what you dont see is that with in each divide there are many differing voices. there are hard core leftys and hardcore rightys within each party and everything in between. i surmise at this point that there is much more unity (tho not near 100%) within the repubs. and many, if not most (majority wise)of the dimdumdems who are just downright flaky (hence the term 'snowflakes') meaning they just dont care that much, they are democrat cuz theyve always been democrat, their whole family has ALWAYS been democrat, they are told what to say, what to think, how to vote, so they never do the work. they are the ones who just cant watch the news everyday cuz it just makes them feel bad. they would rather watch the dog and pony shows of unreality reality tv
2/17/2017 4:49:08 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nuffan Kennesaw, GA 54, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from beanhammer: Fact. it is the older democrats That are racist here today. BULLSHIT.... I grew up in North Atlanta I saw it unfold FIRST HAND... Those Dixiecrat Democrats all migrated to the Republican party... The people who they represent did not just up and move...there was no great southern exodus... They were democrats one day...the next they were republicans... try as you might..you will never get around that FACT!!! [Edited 2/17/2017 4:49:42 PM ]
2/17/2017 5:02:10 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
annamally Santa Clarita, CA 97, joined Feb. 2013	Quote from nuffan: BULLSHIT.... I grew up in North Atlanta I saw it unfold FIRST HAND... Those Dixiecrat Democrats all migrated to the Republican party... The people who they represent did not just up and move...there was no great southern exodus... They were democrats one day...the next they were republicans... try as you might..you will never get around that FACT!!! Democrats do not become Republicans ..... They have too much hate in their hearts toward Republicans to ever do that .
2/17/2017 5:06:29 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nuffan Kennesaw, GA 54, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from annamally: Democrats do not become Republicans ..... They have too much hate in their hearts toward Republicans to ever do that . They did ALL OVER THE SOUTH.... Dixiecrats were not TYPICAL democrats... They were states rights anti federalist...who wanted no part of the federal government telling them how they could treat non whites... They were a big part of the Christian RIGHT shift in the mid 1970's [Edited 2/17/2017 5:06:51 PM ]
2/17/2017 5:28:06 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	Quote from clarity101: i agree and disagree with much of what you posted... imo....you also are wearing the '2party' blinders. yes, most folks do vote repub or dimdumdem. and accordingly, each 'party' comprises of nearly a 50/50 split. but what you dont see is that with in each divide there are many differing voices. there are hard core leftys and hardcore rightys within each party and everything in between. i surmise at this point that there is much more unity (tho not near 100%) within the repubs. and many, if not most (majority wise)of the dimdumdems who are just downright flaky (hence the term 'snowflakes') meaning they just dont care that much, they are democrat cuz theyve always been democrat, their whole family has ALWAYS been democrat, they are told what to say, what to think, how to vote, so they never do the work. they are the ones who just cant watch the news everyday cuz it just makes them feel bad. they would rather watch the dog and pony shows of unreality reality tv You must be posting from your smart phone. The democrat party is not the democrat party of the 30's, 40's, 50's, and 60's. Since the 1990's it has been controlled by the Clinton Machine. In other words a bunch of corporatists who focus on identity politics in the hopes that voters don't figure out that they really don't give a shit about them. However, there is a grass roots movement to take back the party and make it represent the middle class again and not corporate interests. That's the Bernie Sanders branch which is still the minority, but is growing. There used to be absolutely no redeeming quality about the republicans except their feigned attempt at portraying themselves as anti-politically correct. However, a redeeming quality is emerging in the party, albeit grudgingly. They're coming around to being more anti-open borders. The Bush wing of the party which has been dominant until Trump was very open borders. That's part of the reason why the establishment repubs don't like Trump. Now, I don't hate immigrants. It's purely an economic issue to me. When wages have been stagnant since 2000 the last thing we need is to increase the labor supply. We need to reduce it. We also need to increase the demand for labor. How do we do that? Getting rid of bad trade deals and making it more painful for companies to ship jobs out of the country. We also need to lower the restrictions and regulations on start up small businesses, not just on the federal level, but on the state levels. Actually the state regulations is what discourages people from starting a small business which I personally can attest to. When you simultaneously reduce the supply of labor and increase the demand for labor that forces the money down from the 1% to the middle class where it belongs. Will that cause inflation? A little, but economists will tell you that there are two types of inflation. Good inflation(wage based) and bad inflation(material not labor shortages such as oil).
2/17/2017 6:05:23 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nuffan Kennesaw, GA 54, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from nole_89: You must be posting from your smart phone. The democrat party is not the democrat party of the 30's, 40's, 50's, and 60's. Since the 1990's it has been controlled by the Clinton Machine. In other words a bunch of corporatists who focus on identity politics in the hopes that voters don't figure out that they really don't give a shit about them. However, there is a grass roots movement to take back the party and make it represent the middle class again and not corporate interests. That's the Bernie Sanders branch which is still the minority, but is growing. There used to be absolutely no redeeming quality about the republicans except their feigned attempt at portraying themselves as anti-politically correct. However, a redeeming quality is emerging in the party, albeit grudgingly. They're coming around to being more anti-open borders. The Bush wing of the party which has been dominant until Trump was very open borders. That's part of the reason why the establishment repubs don't like Trump. Now, I don't hate immigrants. It's purely an economic issue to me. When wages have been stagnant since 2000 the last thing we need is to increase the labor supply. We need to reduce it. We also need to increase the demand for labor. How do we do that? Getting rid of bad trade deals and making it more painful for companies to ship jobs out of the country. We also need to lower the restrictions and regulations on start up small businesses, not just on the federal level, but on the state levels. Actually the state regulations is what discourages people from starting a small business which I personally can attest to. When you simultaneously reduce the supply of labor and increase the demand for labor that forces the money down from the 1% to the middle class where it belongs. Will that cause inflation? A little, but economists will tell you that there are two types of inflation. Good inflation(wage based) and bad inflation(material not labor shortages such as oil). The last truly CONSERVATIVE president was Warren G Harding...He is blamed for a scandal after his untimely death...many believe he was simply framed because he was dead... Old school CONSERVATIVES were small government fiscal conservatives...who believed in Social Security... People today just do not realize what the elderly was costing the federal Budget prior to Social Security... Today's republican is what little remains of the old school conservative...a growing faction of theocratic leaders who want to undo the first amendment, and those trying to guise as smaller government but want to legislate bathrooms and marriage...the so called constitutionals in the party want to go back to separate but equal...allowing states to determine civil rights... Democrats lose mostly on their f**k up view on gun control...you are not going to legislate guns out of existence...all they would end up doing is preventing law abiding citizens a chance at defending themselves... Hillary was simply not a democrat...She was a corporate globalist...and that is not what the democrats were supposed to be about... The democrats are about to fall second chair to the new independent party "Peoples Party" which will certainly be a left leaning party...but will not allow the corporate owned in... Conservatism in this country died almost a century ago...
2/18/2017 3:35:50 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
maggievalleymtn Whiteville, NC 64, joined Jun. 2013
2/18/2017 5:16:51 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
wttdrp New York, NY 52, joined Aug. 2015	What is the world science and technology first? In the world Where The the people treatment first good?Military, political, economic, scientific and technological, cultural, financial, banking, news, prevention, health, agriculture, all aspects of the people? People have culture, Have technology Genteel, Where is the wisdom?
2/18/2017 9:24:08 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
maggievalleymtn Whiteville, NC 64, joined Jun. 2013
2/18/2017 11:01:10 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
wttdrp New York, NY 52, joined Aug. 2015	In the United States to participate in the party's big capitalists how much? Yes who? Please the United States and the world big capitalists letter, Skype: yangwwst1964, Mail: [email protected] 1964 year Birthday The World leader Yang Wenwei plan establishment American world capitalist manage ment Committee Leading the US and world capitalists to make money! What are the big capitalists who participated in the US Republican Party? who is it? What are the capitalists who participated in the US Democrats? who is it? Who is the capitalist who does not participate in the party?
2/18/2017 1:01:01 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
louie6332 Falkville, AL 75, joined Nov. 2011 online now!	This is for you Maggie: Those identifying with Clinton, Obama plunge to 25%: http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/dems-taking-it-on-chin-in-daily-tracking-poll/ By defending Obama, who is commanding a communist Revolution from his mansion in Washington DC. with Soros paid protesters, you are making yourself a party to that. By waging war on Trump, you are waging war on us, the majority of the American people. That’s shameful. Louie
2/18/2017 1:17:57 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
cafe_express Mobile, AL 84, joined Mar. 2013	Go Louie!
2/18/2017 1:24:00 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	Quote from louie6332: This is for you Maggie: Those identifying with Clinton, Obama plunge to 25%: http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/dems-taking-it-on-chin-in-daily-tracking-poll/ By defending Obama, who is commanding a communist Revolution from his mansion in Washington DC. with Soros paid protesters, you are making yourself a party to that. By waging war on Trump, you are waging war on us, the majority of the American people. That’s shameful. Louie Louie listens to too much right wing radio. Obama ain't communist. He's a corporatist. Just like Hillary.
2/18/2017 3:25:28 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
louie6332 Falkville, AL 75, joined Nov. 2011 online now!	Nole, the only reason you so not know about Obama’s communist upbringing and training and background is because you have been relying on the Major News Media, which is owned by the Illuminati, who also control the Federal Government and used as the CIA’s Propaganda arm for its py-op operation against the American people. You didn’t know that Obama was a Communist because the Ministry of Propaganda was silent about that. Here are some quotes from a couple of articles linked below: “Obama’s links to hardcore anti-American people and groups is so pervasive that had he applied to work at the White House prior to becoming president, he would NOT have received a security clearance. The media knew much of this info but made a concerted effort to avoid stories about Obama’s background. During the 2008 presidential campaign, this author even sent evidence of Obama’s 1996 “New Party” (a socialist party) membership to a half dozen prominent reporters and received no response. “Once elected and knowing full well the media would dutifully refuse to report on the background of his own appointees, Obama appointed a slew of communists and socialists to key positions throughout his administration, who then proceeded to destroy our economy and our culture. “Even though socialism /communism has caused at least 60 million deaths worldwide, our media has decided that it is more acceptable than racism. This is because many reporters are leftists who still believe in the socialist utopia dream. It should be clear by now that our media is treacherous and cannot be trusted to do what’s best for the country.” Quoted from the link: http://www.westernjournalism.com/just-radical-people-influenced-barack-hussein-obama/ “From the time he was 9 years old, he was influenced by Frank Marshall Davis, who was a communist,” Giuliani said. The ex-mayor added that Obama’s grandfather introduced him to Davis, a writer and labor activist. “Giuliani also said another bad influence on Obama was Saul Alinsky, a community organizer whom the ex-mayor called a “socialist.” “The man once called “America’s mayor’’ also sharply criticized the president for having been a member of a church led by radical Chicago Rev. Jeremiah Wright. “He spent 17 years in the church of Jeremiah Wright, and this is the guy who said ‘God damn America, not God bless America,’?’’ Giuliani said. “Obama never left that church. “He was educated by people who were critics of the US. And he has not been able to overcome those influences.” Quotes from Giuliani from the article in the link: Giuliani said that Obama was influenced by communists since his youth. http://nypost.com/2015/02/21/giuliani-obama-influenced-by-communists-since-youth/ Nole, Obama was raised by a communist and around Communists, and he said in his book that he hung around with the communist Alinsky crowd while attending university because they had the same world view as himself, and he was later trained and worked as a community organizer. And as an ex-president, he has returned to his community organizer work, but on a national scale. He is commanding a communist army of Soros paid revolutionaries in an attempt to start a Communist revolution and bring President Trump down. Of course, ex-president Obama and the Major News Media are not only waging war against President Trump, they are waging war against those of us, the majority of the American people, who voted him into power. He's our President, and we resent the continual war that the left is waging against him. I pray for him everyday that God may bless his efforts to free America from the stranglehold that the New World Order, One World Government, Illuminati, which recently bragged that it controls the governments of Europe and America, and to make America Great again, and that he may guide, and protect him. Louie
2/18/2017 11:53:32 PM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
nole_89 Loganville, GA 54, joined May. 2010	I don't watch mainstream media. But I can tell you're an Alex Jones disciple. Alex Jones takes an ounce of truth and embellishes it with a ton of lies. He does it for one reason. To enrich himself and satisfy his attention wh*re addiction. I've heard him and found him interesting until he started purposely exploiting naive Christians claiming that hidden satanic cults at the very top of political power were controlling everything. The people who control the puppet strings are evil, greedy, and treasonous. But saying that they're all part of a secret satanic cult is unrealistic and wrong. Alex Jones purposely misleads to enrich his pockets and his ego. And what's worse is he diverts attention away from intellectual honest people who ARE trying to inform the public of what is really going on. It isn't Satanism. It's just simple evil greed in it's most criminal form. If the American people ever wake up to it the guilty will answer for it with their heads.
2/19/2017 12:05:11 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
jillybodob Naperville, IL 27, joined Jul. 2013	I doubt you even live in the US. Did your Gov't or Obama pay you to trash America? Quote from wttdrp: What is the world science and technology first? In the world Where The the people treatment first good?Military, political, economic, scientific and technological, cultural, financial, banking, news, prevention, health, agriculture, all aspects of the people? People have culture, Have technology Genteel, Where is the wisdom?
2/19/2017 12:05:54 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
w6o6l6f_1 Richmond, VA 39, joined May. 2014	Quote from maggievalleymtn: You have it backwards. I am proud to say I voted for Trump instead of Hitlery. To exercise my constinunal rights and first amendment.
2/19/2017 12:16:42 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
jillybodob Naperville, IL 27, joined Jul. 2013	This country rejected Hillary's PITI PARTY.
2/19/2017 12:43:03 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
fallguy02379 Brockton, MA 53, joined Sep. 2011	have to admit it's kinda funny watching you cons trying to defend Trump's lack of substance........... and even funnier watching you cons tells us he was the peoples choice after Hillary overwhelmingly won the popular vote and even funnier than that was watching how you cons say she won the popular vote because of voter fraud.........only to see the fraud being carried out by those who voted for Trump............twice!!! Priceless!!!!
2/19/2017 8:43:32 AM	Against all odds Conservatism wins again \| Page 19
clarity101 Aurora, CO 66, joined Oct. 2008	Quote from nole_89: You must be posting from your smart phone. The democrat party is not the democrat party of the 30's, 40's, 50's, and 60's. Since the 1990's it has been controlled by the Clinton Machine. In other words a bunch of corporatists who focus on identity politics in the hopes that voters don't figure out that they really don't give a shit about them. However, there is a grass roots movement to take back the party and make it represent the middle class again and not corporate interests. That's the Bernie Sanders branch which is still the minority, but is growing. There used to be absolutely no redeeming quality about the republicans except their feigned attempt at portraying themselves as anti-politically correct. However, a redeeming quality is emerging in the party, albeit grudgingly. They're coming around to being more anti-open borders. The Bush wing of the party which has been dominant until Trump was very open borders. That's part of the reason why the establishment repubs don't like Trump. Now, I don't hate immigrants. It's purely an economic issue to me. When wages have been stagnant since 2000 the last thing we need is to increase the labor supply. We need to reduce it. We also need to increase the demand for labor. How do we do that? Getting rid of bad trade deals and making it more painful for companies to ship jobs out of the country. We also need to lower the restrictions and regulations on start up small businesses, not just on the federal level, but on the state levels. Actually the state regulations is what discourages people from starting a small business which I personally can attest to. When you simultaneously reduce the supply of labor and increase the demand for labor that forces the money down from the 1% to the middle class where it belongs. Will that cause inflation? A little, but economists will tell you that there are two types of inflation. Good inflation(wage based) and bad inflation(material not labor shortages such as oil). i dont own a smart phone and i dont post on dh from my phone. so i dont know what that has to do with anything. and you like most lieinglooneyleftysocialistprogressivedimdumdems are in denial of the origins and history of the demoncrats party and its connections to the kkk despite true history demoncrats love to rewrite history...thats part of what is at issue with all public schools today [Edited 2/19/2017 8:44:20 AM ]

© 2017 DateHookup.dating - 100% Free Online Dating

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Help | Privacy Policy
| Forums | Groups | Safety Tips | Countries