Repealing or replacing something that's not affordable?

You're saying he's not repealing the ACA at all? What is his plan for replacement?

Are you saying they aren't replacing the aca?

What are they replacing it with? What are Trump's current plans for replacement?

Jitss, I haven't seen any concrete info on what is replacing the ACA. That's why I'm asking you for that info, since you're saying it's being replaced, rather than just repealed. Here's your chance to back up your claim. What are they replacing it with?

So your saying there will be no replacement?,,, yes or no... just answer it no spin it's a yes or no question...
thank you

Got to A better way, GOP.com for all your answers I already read it.

I already said that I haven't seen any concrete replacement plans. If you say there are some, share them here. Let's see you back up what you're saying.

Trump only signs off on it...

CONGRESS has to make it happen...and too many in Congress have stated they will not repeal it without a replacement...They have also gone so far to say even if they pass the votes they will not actually take it out without the replacement in place...


So I think it is going to have to have a replacement before they actually follow through with undoing the actual regulation.

and rather than talking in circles on replacements can some one explain this removal of barriers on State lines...

It is a great sound byte of a talking point...but until you understand why the barrier exist the idea the barrier is just going to go away is delusional....lol

"You take on the intelligence community? They have six ways from Sunday of getting back at you" - Chuck Schumer



Chuck Schumer says CIA & FBI are plotting REVENGE AGAINST Donald Trump
Senator Chuck Schumer said on Rachel Maddow's show, "Let me tell you, you take on…
YOUTUBE.COM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfEqh8sdQ70

https://youtu.be/UfEqh8sdQ70

Your not answering the question,, do you think they are going to replace it yes or no (not if you have all the details in front of you at the moment..).

Answer the question yes or no!
Are republicans planning on replacing it

City, as you know, we had health care before the ACA was passed. What will ACA, which is anything but affordable (Democrats are always labeling bills the exact opposite of what they are in order to get them passes), be replaced with, you ask?

Well, when we asked YOU what was in the ACA when you are trying to ram it down our throats, you famously said: “You’ll have to pass it first to find out what’s in it”. Remember that? But we were assured that “if you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance, and if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor”, but that was not in there, that was a bold faced lie just to get it passed, and Obama later admitted that it was a lie. It’s authors later revealed that ACA was meant to fail, that failure was written into it, that it was only the first step towards a so-called “one payer health care”, that is, towards Government monopoly health care, which outlaws private health care and gives the Government a total monopoly on health care. Which, by the way, is not one of the powers that the Constitution reserves to the Federal Government, and which, therefore is unconstitutional. And now, after slapping the American people in the face with ACA without us even knowing what was in it, you are wanting to know what it will be replaced with before legislative action can even be discussed. I have an idea, why not replace it with what we have before the ACA destroyed affordable health care? What we had was far, far more affordable than ACA and, generally speaking, much better insurance.

Government monopoly health care has not worked out in the UK, the other day, they had to declare a health emergency because the system was so broken down.

Nuffan, you make a good point about why states forbad buying insurance across state lines. It’s a shame, however, when States have to take such measures to keep the Federal Government from unconstitutionally interfering with States rights. Of course, as we have seen with the ACA and other actions, it hasn’t worked, for the Federal Government is Hell bent on interfering with State and individual rights whether the States like it to not.

Louie

City, as you know, we had health care before the ACA was passed. What will ACA, which is anything but affordable (Democrats are always labeling bills the exact opposite of what they are in order to get them passes), be replaced with, you ask?

Wellwhat was in the ACA when you are trying to ram it down our throats, you famously said: “You’ll have to pass it first to find out what’s in it”. Remember that? But we were assured that “if you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance, and if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor”, but that was not in there, that was a bold faced lie just to get it passed, and Obama later admitted that it was a lie. It’s authors later revealed that ACA was meant to fail, that failure was written into it, that it was only the first step towards a so-called “one payer health care”, that is, towards Government monopoly health care, which outlaws private health care and gives the Government a total monopoly on health care. Which, by the way, is not one of the powers that the Constitution reserves to the Federal Government, and which, therefore is unconstitutional. And now, after slapping the American people in the face with ACA without us even knowing what was in it, you are wanting to know what it will be replaced with before legislative action can even be discussed. I have an idea, why not replace it with what we have before the ACA destroyed affordable health care? What we had was far, far more affordable than ACA and, generally speaking, much better insurance.

Government monopoly health care has not worked out in the UK, the other day, they had to declare a health emergency because the system was so broken down.

Nuffan, you make a good point about why states forbad buying insurance across state lines. It’s a shame, however, when States have to take such measures to keep the Federal Government from unconstitutionally interfering with States rights. Of course, as we have seen with the ACA and other actions, it hasn’t worked, for the Federal Government is Hell bent on interfering with State and individual rights whether the States like it to not.

Louie

Ohhh so you think he's going let people go with out health insurance for years interesting you believe that.. do you have any mental issues?

City, if you are going to make a statement like that, please research what is going to be done in place of it and make an argument about the replacement.

NO ONE is going to be without coverage.
NO ONE is going to have the rug pulled out from under them


Existing diagnosis will still be covered, offspring up to 26 will still be covered under the parents plan.

Under this AHC, a friend of mine was removed from the kidney transplant list, essentially giving her a preventable death sentence.

Health care Premiums and deductibles have risen, choices have fallen to only 1 in some states.

What WILL happen;
There will be a transition period of a few years. In the interim the law will allow us to now buy insurance across state lines stopping the monopoly that now exists, where people only have ONE choice under the AHC due to the poor planning of this health care plan.

A competitive market as with anything will drive DOWN the prices for premiums, lower deductibles and increase better coverage if they want to stay in business in this country.

Not one single Republican congressman voted for ObamaCare, it was strictly an Obama Democrat creation. No one was even allow to read it until after it was passed, and then only certain people were allowed to read it. Obama wanted a single payer system (Government monopoly system), but not even the Democrats would support that, so ObamaCare was a stepping stone to it. It was meant to fail, with a single payer system having to take its place. But that plan is gone now that Trump is elected. Socialist medicine is a disaster. The socialist health system in the UK has now been officially declared a health disaster.

Louie

Your Medicare is socialistic medicine. Is that a disaster? Do you want to get rid of it?

You mentioned no Republicans voted for Obamacare. What have they voted for that Obama wanted? Didn't they make a pledge to block/obstruct every single thing Obama wanted!

I am sorry Louie, but I expect Trump to support a single payer system that insures everyone from the cradle to the grave. (And taxes all of us to do that.)

But don't be too upset over this.

First off, the Republicans, as well as Donald Trump, will do this in a far more rational way than the Democrats would do it.

Cost savings will be studied, and implemented when possible. Class Action Suits will be severely limited. (The days of the Lawyer getting a hundred million dollars, and each of his clients getting five dollars off on their next visit to the offending Doctor, are gone.)

The plan is to pass a law getting rid of Obamacare,,, but that will not be done, until the Congress can come up with a far better plan to replace it with.

That should put the Democrats in the mood to try to work with Trump and the Republicans to come up with a Health Plan that works for everyone,,, not just the welfare bunch.

You'll have to take that up with the sources who wrote the articles....I'm seeing single payer called different names. I'm far more interested in hearing what Louie has to say about participating in the Medicare Social Program than your petty nitpicking. Go and bore someone else.

Maggie, you ask me how I feel about my Medicare. “OK for you,”, you say, “but to hell with others who have pre-existing conditions?”

Well, geeze, where do I begin? You could write a book on this subject, there are a lot of facets to it. But I will hit a few of the high points.

1) First of all, despite the shortcomings of Medicare, I prefer it to Obamacare--and that’s the understatement of the century. In fact, if there were only Obamacare, I would not touch it with a ten foot pole, it is a total ripoff and deliberately designed to fail right out of the gate, and is intended to give the Federal Government control over your health care, force your insurance to cover the cost of the brutal murder of infants, the murder of old people who are deemed to no longer be useful to society, and to cover young Black hoodlums instead who are shooting one another up on the streets, and I will have absolutely no part of that. My answer to that is not only NO, but HELL NO! Furthermore, the Federal Government has no Constitutional right to tell me I HAVE to buy health insurance. I am resentful enough of the Federal Government unconstitutionally seizing control of the Medical Establishment and going into partnership with it to tolerate ObamaCare.

2) I use Medicare Part B and a Blue Cross supplement that covers all expenses Medicare does not cover, including deductibles. So I have no out of pocket medical costs except for these the cost of these two policies, and they are fairly reasonable, considering the high cost of medical insurance today.

3) I do not, and will not, and do not recommend, Medicare Part D, which covers medicines. I do not use prescription medicines, they are way overpriced, treat symptoms rather than causes, and have bad side effects, which themselves have to be treated. In fact, you are taking your life in your hands when you use them, and the same is true for many approved over the counter medicines. I take my health care in my own hands. Instead, I use herbal and alternative remedies that treat causes and actually cure maladies, they are quite reasonable in cost and have few if any harmful side effects. And that’s the only way to go. I also avoid the poisons the Government and artificial food industry puts in drinking water, soft drinks, processed canned food, and, as already noted, in medicines. And this has served me well. Of course if I were in an accident or got shot or whatever, I would need a surgeon. For medical advice, I can go directly to the Internet, to homeopathic doctors and homeopathic dentists (doctors that use natural and alternative remedies in addition to conventional medicine, and they are highly successful in their practices), and to my own collection of data on alternative and natural remedies, and to my store of alternative and natural remedies (some of which I buy in bulk), that I have accumulated over the last fifteen years. And this has served me well. And it is relatively inexpensive.

4) If I were younger and had no choice but to buy medical insurance, I would buy ShareCare, a Christian health CoOp (I guess is how you would describe it) in which Christians pool their money and cover each other’s medical costs as they arise. Unlike commercial ObamaCare insurance companies, it works and is not going bankrupt or anything like that, and is recognized by the Federal Government.

ObamaCare is now on its death bed, and I advise everyone to stay away from it. It is essentially little more than a transfer of wealth to those who do not have insurance. And yes, as already noted here, the Federal Government is now also messing up medicare with a barrage of new Federal rules. Because of this, many doctors are now refusing to see ObamaCare patients and even new Medicare patients, and many are leaving the medical profession in disgust. Too many silly rules and reams of paperwork, and the Federal Government is not wanting to pay them the going charge for services. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS KILLING THE MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT EVEN AS I WRITE.

5) I lived without medical insurance when I was younger. I am very frugal and considered insurance to be outrageously expensive (I will come back and comment on medical insurance later and how it itself has driven up the cost of medical care). On those rare occasions when I saw a doctor, I paid the doctor and medical cost myself out of pocket.

6) When I learned of herbal and alternative remedies, I turned to them, and they have served me well, very well. And I have even successfully advised others on how to treat their injuries and diseases, curing colds, warts, bronchitis, whooping cough, chem trail flu, cellulitis, injuries and cuts, even cancer (three cases of cancer successfully cured). I get phone calls asking for money to buy a teddy bear to comport some little kid dying of cancer in the hospital or whatever, and I stop them in mid sentence and tell them the little kid doesn’t have to die, that there are herbal and alternative cures for cancer and to give the parents my phone number (which they already have since they called me) and I will tell them how to cure it, but they never do, they are just interested in the money. So a lot of people die unnecessarily from cancer who don’t have to. They have developed the attitude that “doctor knows best”. It’s a shame. We need to write that on a lot of tomb stones in the cemetery: “Her doctor knew best”.

Well, I am out of time for now, I will come back later when I have the time and give a brief overview of the medical establishment in the US and how it went to Hell in a hand basket when the drug companies and the Federal Government became involved in it beginning about the beginning of the twentieth century. And their involvement in it is all unconstitutional. The only thing I want from the Federal Government is for them to stay the hell out of my life.

Louie