| 1/28/2017 1:38:20 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
| 1/28/2017 1:39:58 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
citylights01
Annapolis, MD
38, joined Feb. 2013
|
you should tell us....
SHOW us with actual facts just a few of the 'many things besides abortions' that 'planned
parenthood' does for all us women who cant get abortions, breast exams, birth control,
etc. otherwise. show us actual facts and stats citydimwitlights...... 
Wait, so you're grouping abortions, birth control and breast exams together? Do you for some reason think they're the same thing?
|
| 1/28/2017 1:42:02 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Wait, so you're grouping abortions, birth control and breast exams together? Do you for some reason think they're the same thing?
having a difficult time looking up the facts and stats huh???
|
| 1/28/2017 1:48:53 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
citylights01
Annapolis, MD
38, joined Feb. 2013
|
Clarity, I'm trying to figure out what you're talking about. You're being less than clear, despite your name. Try being straightforward for once.
|
| 1/28/2017 1:56:38 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
reginamc
Las Vegas, NV
61, joined Mar. 2011
|
Why is Planned Parenthood the hill they will die on? 
You would think it's the only place in the world to get care - you know if you go there to get BC you're not even going to see a doctor, right?
What is so great about it?
Oh, I remember! They are the #1 abortion provider in the US! That's what matters so much.
|
| 1/28/2017 2:12:56 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Clarity, I'm trying to figure out what you're talking about. You're being less than clear, despite your name. Try being straightforward for once.
WOW!
do you have short term memory issues or are you really just dimwitted???
You do realize planned parenthood does many things besides abortions, right? If you say no, you're either lying, or you're really that ignorant.
you should tell us....
SHOW us with actual facts just a few of the 'many things besides abortions' that 'planned
parenthood' does for all us women who cant get abortions, breast exams, birth control,
etc. otherwise. show us actual facts and stats citydimwitlights......
Wait, so you're grouping abortions, birth control and breast exams together? Do you for some reason think they're the same thing?
noone 'grouped' anything together citydimwitlights....
just respond to the original request that you prove YOUR statement with facts and stats.
is that really so hard????? please stop evading and deflecting
|
| 1/28/2017 2:13:52 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
louie6332
Falkville, AL
75, joined Nov. 2011
|
Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards is on record stating her business is essential to American women because of the prenatal care it offers. She is emphasizing that point as a move develops in Congress to withhold the half-a-billion taxpayer dollars that each year goes to the abortion-industry behemoth. The funding must continue, Richards said, because prenatal care is among “the kinds of services that folks depend on Planned Parenthood for.”
The problem?
Planned Parenthood “offers abortions, so they don’t offer prenatal care,” according to a Tempe, Arizona, spokeswoman for the business. That’s right. The service Planned Parenthood says is so important, it doesn’t provide.
The nonprofit Live Action, in a new video investigation, found 92 out of 97 Planned Parenthood centers contacted admitted they would refuse to provide any prenatal care.
Of the other five, one said it was not accepting new patients, and another said it could provide vitamins.
“No, see, we don’t see pregnant women as a way of giving prenatal care, we see pregnant women, um, you know, if they are considering other options,” was from Planned Parenthood in Santa Fe, New Mexico.
“No, we don’t do prenatal services. I mean, it’s called Planned Parenthood, I know it’s kind of deceiving,” said a Melville, Indiana, spokeswoman.
Another office stated plainly: “We don’t offer prenatal care at Planned Parenthood.”
See the link:
Stunning undercover video admission from spokesmen for Planned Parenthood : “I know it’s kind of deceiving, but we don’t do prenatal services”: http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/planned-parenthood-we-dont-do-prenatal-services/
Go and listen to Planned Parenthood spokesmen tell it like it is if you do not believe me. Planned Parenthood has nothing to do with parenthood, it has to do with the brutal murder of infants and the sale of their body parts, that's their business. And it is an abomination that half a billion of our tax dollars per year pay for the brutal murder of infants. Talk about "choice", it has nothing to do choice, taxpayers are forced at the point of a gun to pay for this abomination, they have no choice. If this abomination does not stop, the wrath of God will come down upon this nation. Thank God for Trump, who is making America great again. Currently, he is the only thing standing between America and the wrath of God.
Louie
|
| 1/28/2017 2:21:42 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
|
| 1/28/2017 2:23:57 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
And on the other hand, Obama signs a bunch of executive orders, and he's a dictator. Trump signs a bunch of executive orders and he's helping us.
Two sides of the same coin.
|
| 1/28/2017 2:26:03 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Elizabeth Warren is always first in line to lecture everyone else and to harp about evil banks.
But now it's been revealed that Warren failed to disclose a $1.3 million line of credit provided to her by none other than--wait for it--Bank of America.
Elizabeth Warren Fails to Disclose $1.3 Million Line of Credit
BUSTED!
BREITBART.COM
|
| 1/28/2017 2:30:26 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
MEAN GENES: Jewish Comedian Chelsea Handler's "Very, very strong" Grandpa With A "Sense of humor" Was A Nazi…But The Trump Family Offends Her »…
100PERCENTFEDUP.COM
|
| 1/28/2017 2:35:37 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
oh how i just love exposing the liberal lunacy and hypocrisy
Liberal logic: Taxpayers don't fund abortions, they fund the organization (Planned Parenthood) that performs the abortions.
This is liberal, pro-abortion double-speak at it's worst.
Pelosi: It’s ‘Fraudulent’ to Say Tax Dollars Fund Abortion
During a press briefing on Wednesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said it is “fraudulent” to claim American tax dollars have been used to…
HTTP://WWW.MRCTV.ORG/BLOG/PELOSI-IT-S-FRAUDULENT-S...
|
| 1/28/2017 4:09:37 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
And on the other hand, Obama signs a bunch of executive orders, and he's a dictator. Trump signs a bunch of executive orders and he's helping us.
Two sides of the same coin.
except that most of trumps executive orders are just UNDOING the damage that obummer
did.
|
| 1/28/2017 4:11:31 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
noone 'grouped' anything together citydimwitlights....
just respond to the original request that you prove YOUR statement with facts and stats.
is that really so hard????? please stop evading and deflecting
almost 2 hours later and nary a word from citydimwitlights....obviously unable to backup
her own words.
|
| 1/28/2017 4:22:43 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
citylights01
Annapolis, MD
38, joined Feb. 2013
|
except that most of trumps executive orders are just UNDOING the damage that obummer
did.
How so, clarity? Please be specific.
|
| 1/28/2017 4:23:51 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
jason_in_tx
Bryan, TX
33, joined Apr. 2013
|
How so, clarity? Please be specific.
That clarity psycho has me blocked, but she's full of it. A lot of the things he keeps signing for the camera amount to basically nothing.
|
| 1/28/2017 4:24:20 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
citylights01
Annapolis, MD
38, joined Feb. 2013
|
almost 2 hours later and nary a word from citydimwitlights....obviously unable to backup
her own words.
You listed abortions, breast exams and birth control together. Do you think that planned parenthood providing breast exams and birth control is a bad thing? Are cancer screenings bad? If you're against abortion, I would think you'd be happy with them providing birth control.
|
| 1/28/2017 4:25:10 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
citylights01
Annapolis, MD
38, joined Feb. 2013
|
That clarity psycho has me blocked, but she's full of it. A lot of the things he keeps signing for the camera amount to basically nothing.
You're not missing much with clarity. I don't expect her to actually be able to explain what she said, as she rarely ever does. Even when she does, it isn't with any clarity.
|
| 1/28/2017 4:46:28 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
wow! these looneyleftys are getting crazier by the minute!
Editor and publisher of the left-leaning German newspaper Die Zeit Josef Joffe has said that “murder in the White House” could be a way to end the “Trump catastrophe” on a German television programme.
Newspaper Editor Calls for 'Murder in the White House'
The Editor-in-chief of Germany's Die Zeit paper has said that "murder in the White House" could be a way to end the "Trump catastrophe"
BREITBART.COM
|
| 1/28/2017 4:53:31 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
cafe_express
Mobile, AL
84, joined Mar. 2013
|
MEAN GENES: Jewish Comedian Chelsea Handler's "Very, very strong" Grandpa With A "Sense of humor" Was A Nazi…But The Trump Family Offends Her »…
100PERCENTFEDUP.COM
Wow, a Jew that turned on his own people, helping Hitler exterminate them. WOW
|
| 1/28/2017 5:00:05 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
almost 2 hours later and nary a word from citydimwitlights....obviously unable to backup
her own words.
now going on 3 hours........................nothing!
|
| 1/28/2017 5:02:01 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Since taking office, President Trump has looked to fulfill some of his campaign promises by using executive orders. Here are the 17 orders he has signed so far:
Multi-pronged orders on border security and immigration enforcement including: the authorization of a U.S.-Mexico border wall; the stripping of federal grant money to sanctuary cities; hiring 5,000 more Border Patrol agents; ending “catch-and-release” policies for illegal immigrants; and reinstating local and state immigration enforcement partnerships.
Two orders reviving the Keystone XL pipeline and Dakota Access piplines. He also signed three other related orders that would: expedite the environmental permitting process for infrastructure projects related to the pipelines; direct the Commerce Department to streamline the manufacturing permitting process; and give the Commerce Department 180 days to maximize the use of U.S. steel in the pipeline.
An order to reinstate the so-called "Mexico City Policy" – a ban on federal funds to international groups that perform abortions or lobby to legalize or promote abortion. The policy was instituted in 1984 by President Reagan, but has gone into and out of effect depending on the party in power in the White House.
He signed a notice that the U.S. will begin withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal. Trump called the order "a great thing for the American worker."
An order imposing a hiring freeze for some federal government workers as a way to shrink the size of government. This excludes the military, as Trump noted at the signing.
An order that directs federal agencies to ease the “regulatory burdens” of ObamaCare. It orders agencies to “waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement” of ObamaCare that imposes a “fiscal burden on any State or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, families, healthcare providers, health insurers, patients, recipients of healthcare services, purchasers of health insurance, or makers of medical devices, products, or medications.”
Bans refugees and residents from seven Muslim nations.
Restructure the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council.
Lengthen the ban on administration officials working as lobbyists.
Improve efforts to defeat ISIS
|
| 1/28/2017 5:05:20 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
President Trump signed three executive orders on Saturday afternoon in front of cameras in the Oval Office.
The immediate text of the orders wasn't immediately available, but a senior administration official said one was expected to outline a plan to reorganize the National Security Council.
Trump said another order dealt with a 5-year lobbying ban on administration officials. The senior administration official said it also included a lifetime ban on administration officials lobbying for a foreign country.
The third executive order gives military leaders 30 days to construct and present a report outlining the U.S. strategy for defeating the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the official said.
"I think it's going to be very successful," Trump declared to reporters.
"OK, that's big stuff," Trump said after signing the three orders. "Have a good weekend."
|
| 1/28/2017 5:18:40 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
michael061
Columbia, SC
67, joined Nov. 2007
|
In eight long years, Obama was unable to come up with a plan on how to deal with ISIS.
Trump has given us a plan, in eight short days.
You can disagree with the idea of defeating ISIS, but you can't claim that Obama ever came up with a plan. No good plan, no fair plan, and not even a foolish plan. No plan at all, in eight years.
The third executive order gives military leaders 30 days to construct and present a report outlining the U.S. strategy for defeating the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), the official said.
|
| 1/28/2017 5:20:54 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
longbobby
Lufkin, TX
56, joined Aug. 2010
|
Ruling from U.S. Court of Appeals DC will require Secretary of State w/ Attorney General to recover ALL Clinton emails.
|
| 1/28/2017 5:22:05 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Obama Can’t Escape What He Secretly Did In Georgia Months Ago, He Just Got Brutal News
by Chris Reynolds January 27, 2017 9:01 am0
Former President Barack Hussein Obama is currently in seclusion at his new multi million dollar mansion (how did he get so much money?) in Palm Springs, California, playing golf on his taxpayer funded Presidential pension and keeping a low profile.
You might think that the reason Obama is keeping out of sight is from the embarrassment he is suffering because all of his signature, catastrophic Presidential policies are now thankfully being dismantled by his successor Donald Trump. However, according to reports he is also keeping out of sight because of a serious crime he has become implicated in running.
It is clear that the recent election was plagued with voter fraud, as Democratic operatives who realized with horror that Hillary Clinton was going to lose the election desperately tried to rig our election system in a failed effort to garner Hillary enough votes to squeak by Trump.
Through the Department of Homeland Security, Obama demanded that the states allow them to attempt to hack into their systems, under the guise that they needed to “test security” when it came to election sites. Many states agreed with Obama’s demand, but one state that firmly declined was Georgia.
Despite this, it is now coming out that Obama’s team hacked Georgia’s system anyway. The Inspector General John Roth has opened up an investigation into Obama and this huge felony he allegedly participated in. Wrote Roth to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp that he is “investigating a series of ten alleged scanning events of the Georgia Secretary of State’s network that may have originated from DHS-affiliated IP addresses.”
can anyone say....voter fraud?
|
| 1/28/2017 6:06:39 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
33, joined Dec. 2012
|
except that most of trumps executive orders are just UNDOING the damage that obummer
did.
See what I mean? Proud hypocrite.
|
| 1/28/2017 6:14:27 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
annamally
Santa Clarita, CA
97, joined Feb. 2013
|
See what I mean? Proud hypocrite.
Undoing the terrible Eo's Obama put in place is far more important than b*tching about EO's at this point .
Trump has a hell of alot more to do that will involve Congressional votes .
Get the easy BS out of the way first .
He's a good business man .
Pay attention you might learn something .....
|
| 1/28/2017 6:24:23 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
citylights01
Annapolis, MD
38, joined Feb. 2013
|
Clarity, are you really telling us you're unable to figure out what services planned parenthood provide other than abortion? You're not able to find that anywhere?
|
| 1/28/2017 7:23:49 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
fallguy02379
Brockton, MA
53, joined Sep. 2011
|
Obama Can’t Escape What He Secretly Did In Georgia Months Ago, He Just Got Brutal News
by Chris Reynolds January 27, 2017 9:01 am0
Former President Barack Hussein Obama is currently in seclusion at his new multi million dollar mansion (how did he get so much money?) in Palm Springs, California, playing golf on his taxpayer funded Presidential pension and keeping a low profile.
You might think that the reason Obama is keeping out of sight is from the embarrassment he is suffering because all of his signature, catastrophic Presidential policies are now thankfully being dismantled by his successor Donald Trump. However, according to reports he is also keeping out of sight because of a serious crime he has become implicated in running.
It is clear that the recent election was plagued with voter fraud, as Democratic operatives who realized with horror that Hillary Clinton was going to lose the election desperately tried to rig our election system in a failed effort to garner Hillary enough votes to squeak by Trump.
Through the Department of Homeland Security, Obama demanded that the states allow them to attempt to hack into their systems, under the guise that they needed to “test security” when it came to election sites. Many states agreed with Obama’s demand, but one state that firmly declined was Georgia.
Despite this, it is now coming out that Obama’s team hacked Georgia’s system anyway. The Inspector General John Roth has opened up an investigation into Obama and this huge felony he allegedly participated in. Wrote Roth to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp that he is “investigating a series of ten alleged scanning events of the Georgia Secretary of State’s network that may have originated from DHS-affiliated IP addresses.”
can anyone say....voter fraud?
fake news ......
amazing how those who hate liberals seem to always have someone on the inside giving them info.........that never seems to be verified
|
| 1/28/2017 8:29:14 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
annamally
Santa Clarita, CA
97, joined Feb. 2013
|
fake news ......
amazing how those who hate liberals seem to always have someone on the inside giving them info.........that never seems to be verified
Oh look .... More and more Liberals grabbing on to the " fake news " meme when they just can't answer a question .... 
We will be hearing " fake news " as an answer from loser liberals for the next 4 years !
And It want fly ! 
|
| 1/29/2017 10:26:57 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
louie6332
Falkville, AL
75, joined Nov. 2011
|
WOW, Conservatism is winning again.
Well, the battle begins over Trump stopping Obama’s illegal Muslim immigration plot, and it’s an all out war, but guess what, Trump is going to win. Its time for some Federal judges to be impeached.
Airlines rushing to comply, emirates changes pilot, crew rosters
http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-01-28/a-blunt-and-counterproductive-travel-ban
Trump expands power of immigration officers…agents cheer:
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/28/politics/donald-trump-immigration-detention-deportations-enforcement/
Trump to enlist local police in illegal immigration crackdown
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_TRUMP_IMMIGRATION_LAW_ENFORCEMENT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2017-01-29-09-42-15
Customs agents ignore judge, enforce travel ban: http://nypost.com/2017/01/29/customs-agents-ignore-judge-enforce-trumps-travel-ban-aclu/
Lawyers move in, Soros finances opposition: http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-trailguide-updates-immigration-attorneys-seeking-to-help-1485644960-htmlstory.html
Immigration attorneys seeking to help: http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-trailguide-updates-immigration-attorneys-seeking-to-help-1485644960-htmlstory.htmlACLU sues white house over immigration ban: http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/aclu-sues-white-house-over-immigration-ban/?cat_orig=politics
Judge issues temporary emergency stay of immigration ban, Ruling applies to those who already arrived in U.S. or in transit with valid visas:
http://www.wnd.com/2017/01/judge-issues-temporary-emergency-stay-of-immigration-ban/?cat_orig=politics
Protesters takeover JFK, taxi drivers strike:
http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/28/nyregion/jfk-protests-trump-refugee-ban.html
Holly wood meltdown, journalist freak: http://www.thewrap.com/hollywood-slams-donald-trumps-muslimban-as-disgusting-disturbing/
Merkel meddles, London Khan demands Trump state visit canceled: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-germany-idUSKBN15D0FE?il=0
Prebus: we won’t apologize for keeping American safe [full speed ahead]:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/29/priebus_we_wont_apologize_for_keeping_america_safe.html
Hooray for Trump.
Louie
|
| 1/29/2017 3:03:35 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Those Seven Countries That Trump Stopped Immigration From? Hillary Picked Them.
January 29, 2017 By Robert Gehl
Of all the leftist nitwits jumping on the bandwagon and vilifying President Donald Trump for his perfectly rational and historically consistent temporary restriction on immigration, Hillary Clinton really should know better.
The list of the seven countries that Trump announced a temporary halt to immigration from came right from the Obama State Department.
And good golly, guess who was in charge of the Obama State Department when the list came out.
Why, it was none other than Secretary of State Hillary Clinton!
That’s right. But now, she thinks you’ll forget all that. Because she’s tweetin’ for the masses!
Hillary Clinton ? @HillaryClinton
I stand with the people gathered across the country tonight defending our values & our Constitution. This is not who we are.
8:49 PM - 28 Jan 2017
Nobody remembers back just five years ago when the Obama Administion completely halted all Iraqi refugees to the United States for six months after the FBI uncovered evidence of Iraqi terrorist infiltration into the country via the refugee program.
Sean Davis ? @seanmdav
Obama banned refugees from Iraq for six months in 2011. For some reason there was no blue checkmark meltdown then. http://thefederalist.com/2015/11/18/the-obama-administration-stopped-processing-iraq-refugee-requests-for-6-months-in-2011/ …
8:26 AM - 28 Jan 2017
Photo published for Obama Admin Paused Iraq Refugee Program In 2011
Obama Admin Paused Iraq Refugee Program In 2011
Following reports that Iraqi terrorists slipped into the U.S. through its refugee program, the Obama admin halted that program for six months in 2011.
thefederalist.com
And … well, now we know who was Secretary of State in 2011....
DngrMse @Dngrmse2001S
Trying to remember here....who was Secretary of State when Obama imposed a similar ban on Iraq in 2011? Oh....it was you. Hypocrite. https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/825551481927503872 …
5:18 AM - 29 Jan 2017
Hillary Clinton ? @HillaryClinton
I stand with the people gathered across the country tonight defending our values & our Constitution. This is not who we are.
Dustin @dustin_temple10
.@HillaryClinton Weren't you the Secretary of State in 2011? http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-kentucky-us-dozens-terrorists-country-refugees/story?id=20931131 … pic.twitter.com/GU5CrF4lrL
9:55 PM - 28 Jan 2017
Dustin @dustin_temple10
.@HillaryClinton Weren't you the Secretary of State in 2011? http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/al-qaeda-kentucky-us-dozens-terrorists-country-refugees/story?id=20931131 … pic.twitter.com/GU5CrF4lrL
A Fool to Cry @afooltocry
@dustin_temple10 It was a record breaking day for hypocrites, we should have known @HillaryClinton was going to join in the fray.
10:19 PM - 28 Jan 2017
Limiting travel – even temporarily – is not a bad thing, it’s not unprecedented, and it’s nothing that almost every president in history has done at one time or another.
But don’t tell the left that. They’re still a-tweetin’.
Piers Morgan ? @piersmorgan
Sorry, Mr President, but your #MuslimBan is senseless, cruel & wrong. http://dailym.ai/2jrYUuy
7:18 AM - 29 Jan 2017
Nitwits.
|
| 1/29/2017 4:03:52 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
You listed abortions, breast exams and birth control together. Do you think that planned parenthood providing breast exams and birth control is a bad thing? Are cancer screenings bad? If you're against abortion, I would think you'd be happy with them providing birth control.
one more time....
let me outline it for you now that you have evaded answering for yourself once again for
more than 24 hours..................
YOU are the one who claims pp provides more than just murderous abortions. i asked YOU
to back that claim up and tell us with facts and stats just exactly what 'other' services'
are provided by pp. do it or shut the hell up. you are letting your evilness shine thru
more each day citydimwitlies!
Quote from louie6332:
Yep Café, you're exactly right. The Liberals are always labeling things the exact opposite of what they are. Planned Parenthood has absolutely nothing to do with parenthood, but the exact opposite. The correct title would be “Planned Infanticide”. That’s their business, murdering infants.
Louie
you are both 100% correct! plannedinfanticide has absolutely NOTHING to do with 'planned
parenting!
Quote from citylights01:
You do realize planned parenthood does many things besides abortions, right? If you say no, you're either lying, or you're really that ignorant.
you should tell us....
SHOW us with actual facts just a few of the 'many things besides abortions' that 'planned
parenthood' does for all us women who cant get abortions, breast exams, birth control,
etc. otherwise. show us actual facts and stats citydimwitlights......
Quote from clarity101:
almost 2 hours later and nary a word from citydimwitlights....obviously unable to backup
her own words.
then one of your little misfitbuttys steps in to rescue you...
but you still have not backed your statement with facts and stats...WHY???
Quote from citydimwitlights:
You listed abortions, breast exams and birth control together. Do you think that planned parenthood providing breast exams and birth control is a bad thing? Are cancer screenings bad? If you're against abortion, I would think you'd be happy with them providing birth control.
Quote from jason_in_tx:
That clarity psycho has me blocked, but she's full of it. A lot of the things he keeps signing for the camera amount to basically nothing.
Quote from citydimwitlights:
You're not missing much with clarity. I don't expect her to actually be able to explain
what she said, as she rarely ever does. Even when she does, it isn't with any clarity.
Clarity, are you really telling us you're unable to figure out what services planned parenthood provide other than abortion? You're not able to find that anywhere?
now here we are more than 24 hours later and you still cant back up your claim
not only that, but you dont acknowledge regis' comments as well funny how you
just manage to jump on the most convenient band wagon going in the opposite direction.
why is that citydimwitlies?
Quote from citylights01:
You do realize planned parenthood does many things besides abortions, right? If you say no, you're either lying, or you're really that ignorant.
And yet they have a quota for abortions at each facility and ex-employees testify that they are routinely increased.
Bet they don't have a QUOTA for Pap smears.
Why is Planned Parenthood the hill they will die on?
You would think it's the only place in the world to get care - you know if you go there to get BC you're not even going to see a doctor, right?
What is so great about it?
Oh, I remember! They are the #1 abortion provider in the US! That's what matters so much.
is it all just too much for ya citydimwitlies, to back up your own words??????
|
| 1/29/2017 4:06:41 PM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Overall, do you approve or disapprove of former President Obama's job performance?
Approve 659,485(44%)
Disapprove 828,662(55%)
Visit Newsmax’s mobile homepage
|
| 1/30/2017 9:05:15 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
too bad many folks just refuse to pay attention to the facts...
Donald J. Trump
Statement Regarding Recent Executive Order Concerning Extreme Vetting
“America is a proud nation of immigrants and we will continue to show compassion to those fleeing oppression, but we will do so while protecting our own citizens and border. America has always been the land of the free and home of the brave.
We will keep it free and keep it safe, as the media knows, but refuses to say. My policy is similar to what President Obama did in 2011 when he banned visas for refugees from Iraq for six months. The seven countries named in the Executive Order are the same countries previously identified by the Obama administration as sources of terror. To be clear, this is not a Muslim ban, as the media is falsely reporting.
This is not about religion - this is about terror and keeping our country safe. There are over 40 different countries worldwide that are majority Muslim that are not affected by this order. We will again be issuing visas to all countries once we are sure we have reviewed and implemented the most secure policies over the next 90 days.
I have tremendous feeling for the people involved in this horrific humanitarian crisis in Syria. My first priority will always be to protect and serve our country, but as President I will find ways to help all those who are suffering.”
|
| 1/30/2017 9:26:38 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
finally!!! thank YOU JESUS!
citylights01
38 years old updated!
Annapolis, MD
1507 miles away
citylights01:This member set their profile to invisible, sorry! Only friends can view this profile.
FINALLLLY!!!!
|
| 1/30/2017 9:27:31 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
jitssbaby617
Roslindale, MA
38, joined Jun. 2014
|
finally!!! thank YOU JESUS!
citylights01
38 years old updated!
Annapolis, MD
1507 miles away
citylights01:This member set their profile to invisible, sorry! Only friends can view this profile.
FINALLLLY!!!!
She blocked you? Lol
|
| 1/30/2017 9:27:48 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
maggievalleymtn
Whiteville, NC
64, joined Jun. 2013
|
"So an investigation taking over a year and costing taxpayers millions of dollars to see if Hillary's private email server was hacked was necessary for national security, but the hacking of a presidential election and potential blackmail of the president....who by the way, uses an unsecured phone and private email server....by Russia is of no national security concern to republicans. Only in a third rate spy novel or today's hypocritical, treasonous Republican Party would this be acceptable"
|
| 1/30/2017 9:29:46 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
rufftreasure
Fairmont, MN
61, joined Jun. 2014
|
I agree ,Maggie
|
| 1/30/2017 9:30:04 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
She blocked you? Lol
yeppers!
|
| 1/30/2017 9:37:59 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
54, joined Mar. 2014
|
"So an investigation taking over a year and costing taxpayers millions of dollars to see if Hillary's private email server was hacked was necessary for national security, but the hacking of a presidential election and potential blackmail of the president....who by the way, uses an unsecured phone and private email server....by Russia is of no national security concern to republicans. Only in a third rate spy novel or today's hypocritical, treasonous Republican Party would this be acceptable"
The presidential election was not hacked...lol
The DNC was EXPOSED not hacked...
According to Julian Assange the information they leaked did not come from the Russians...it came from a DNC insider...FYI an insider does not have to HACK...since they are on the inside...they only have to leak the information...
No one is HACKING 256K encryption...256K methodology was specifically designed to meet the requirements of HIPPA...you can not brute force your way past 256K encryption...
|
| 1/30/2017 9:39:41 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
rufftreasure
Fairmont, MN
61, joined Jun. 2014
|
You are correct, leakage occurred.
|
| 1/30/2017 9:44:41 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
jitssbaby617
Roslindale, MA
38, joined Jun. 2014
|
Tough times for her,, America is getting better and she can't use lame stream media taking points with us lol poor city haha
|
| 1/30/2017 9:52:02 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
rambo_was_real
Aurora, CO
22, joined Aug. 2014
|
"So an investigation taking over a year and costing taxpayers millions of dollars to see if Hillary's private email server was hacked was necessary for national security, but the hacking of a presidential election and potential blackmail of the president....who by the way, uses an unsecured phone and private email server....by Russia is of no national security concern to republicans. Only in a third rate spy novel or today's hypocritical, treasonous Republican Party would this be acceptable"
Who gives a shit if Trump uses a secure phone line? (If there's any truth to your claim.)
He's straight the f**k up about what he's doing.
His presidency is gonna offer the transparency in government that the last administration said it would give us. No need to hide shit if you're doin exactly what your saying you are.
Should you be off organizing another Slut Sit-in?
|
| 1/30/2017 9:55:11 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
fishnthec
Mesquite, TX
65, joined Oct. 2010
|
|
| 1/30/2017 9:56:51 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
54, joined Mar. 2014
|
You are correct, leakage occurred.
The idea the Russians are behind it, is comical...
It is like the Democrats want a pass on what was leaked because it was the Russians...had the Russians not done this, we would have gotten away with it...lol
but when the source of the leaks comes out and says it was an insider...not Russians...
Perhaps the whole Russian outrage is simply deflection....
[Edited 1/30/2017 9:58:06 AM ]
|
| 1/30/2017 9:58:53 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
This is a strictly mathematical viewpoint ...
Semper Fi !!!
and it goes like this:
What Makes 100%? What does it mean to give MORE than 100% ?
Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100% ?
We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%.
How about achieving 103% ?
What makes up 100% in life?
Here's a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions:
If:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Is represented as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Then:
H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K
8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98%
And
K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E
11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96%
But ,
A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E
1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%
And,
B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T
2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%
AND, look how far ass-kissing will take you.
A-S-S-K-I-S-S-I-N-G
1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118%
So, one can conclude with mathematical certainty, that while Hard work and Knowledge will get you close,
and Attitude will get you there. It’s the Bullshit and Ass Kissing that will put you over the top.
Now you know why Politicians are where they are!
Have you ever seen a better explanation than this formula ... .......how true it is.....
|
| 1/30/2017 10:01:41 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
fishnthec
Mesquite, TX
65, joined Oct. 2010
|
|
| 1/30/2017 10:01:55 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
maggievalleymtn
Whiteville, NC
64, joined Jun. 2013
|
The idea the Russians are behind it, is comical...
It is like the Democrats want a pass on what was leaked because it was the Russians...had the Russians not done this, we would have gotten away with it...lol
but when the source of the leaks comes out and says it was an insider...not Russians...
Perhaps the whole Russian outrage is simply deflection....
Excerpt from The Atlantic:
Who is involved?
The intelligence-community assessment provides official backing to media reports from mid-December stating that that Russian President Vladimir Putin was “personally involved” in cyberattacks aimed at interfering with the United States presidential election. In an interview with NPR on December 15, U.S. President Barack Obama vowed that the U.S. would take action in response, “at a time and place of our own choosing.” He went on: “Mr. Putin is well aware of my feelings about this, because I spoke to him directly about it.” On December 29, he did more than speak: He sanctioned the two Russian intelligence services believed to be involved in the hacks (Russian military intelligence, the GRU, and the KGB’s successor the FSB, which is responsible for counterintelligence and internal security). He also expelled 35 Russian officials in the U.S. believed to be intelligence agents. After Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov threatened to retaliate, Putin declined to do so.
Didn’t we already know about Russia hacking the Democratic National Committee and others? Why all the fuss?
The assessment purports to add on-the-record detail on both actors and intent. Prior to mid-December, Putin personally had not been blamed for hacks resulting in leaks damaging to the Clinton campaign, though in October Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stopped just short of doing so, saying that “based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts ... only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.” Secondly, separate intelligence leaks to The New York Times and The Washington Post on December 9 for the first time claimed that the intent of the hacking was to sway the election in favor of Trump, rather than simply sow generalized distrust. It has not yet been suggested that cyberattacks managed to change the actual vote tally in favor of either presidential candidate. This is now the official position of the intelligence community.
Information on what exactly happened has been dripping out slowly, and often anonymously and unofficially, for months. Way back in mid-June, the Democratic National Committee reported an intrusion into its computer network, and the cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike publicly blamed Russian hackers after analyzing the breach. In July, after emails stolen from the committee appeared on WikiLeaks, Democratic members of congress also blamed the Russians, with Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook alleging that “It was the Russians who perpetrated this leak for the purpose of helping Donald Trump and hurting Hillary Clinton.”
Why Didn’t Obama Reveal Intel About Russia’s Influence on the Election?
It wasn’t until September that anonymous federal officials confirmed to The New York Times the intelligence community’s “high confidence” of Russian government involvement in the hack, if not the subsequent leak, and leaving doubt as to whether the hacks were “routine cyberespionage” or actually intended to influence the election. And it wasn’t until October that the Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, went on the record to blame Russia—government actors, not, say, cybercriminals who happened to be Russian, “based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts,” and further declaring that they were “intended to interfere with the U.S. election process.” Days later, emails stolen from Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta appeared on WikiLeaks.
So as of fall, the United States government had officially blamed Russia for the hacks, and stated that the hacks were intended to interfere with the American election. Until December 9, intelligence officials were not claiming that the Russians wanted specifically to help Trump win, as opposed to undermining faith in the overall process. Then The Washington Post disclosed a “secret CIA assessment”—again described by anonymous officials—declaring it “quite clear” that a Trump presidency was the ultimate goal of the hacks. A Times investigation published a few days later provided more background on how the hacks actually worked. Congress is planning to investigate.
|
| 1/30/2017 10:07:47 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
rufftreasure
Fairmont, MN
61, joined Jun. 2014
|
The idea the Russians are behind it, is comical...
It is like the Democrats want a pass on what was leaked because it was the Russians...had the Russians not done this, we would have gotten away with it...lol
but when the source of the leaks comes out and says it was an insider...not Russians...
Perhaps the whole Russian outrage is simply deflection....
I'm still watching the situation unfolding before I make a judgment about the Russians.
I'm convinced the DNC was and presently is as corrupt as they say that republicans are.
They undeniably got busted, time may tell if that's the case regarding the Russians and the republicans.
|
| 1/30/2017 10:11:11 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
citylights01
Annapolis, MD
38, joined Feb. 2013
|
Tough times for her,, America is getting better and she can't use lame stream media taking points with us lol poor city haha
Nah, I just got tired of clarity's inability to act like an adult. Do I need to put you in time out, too.
|
| 1/30/2017 10:14:14 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
maggievalleymtn
Whiteville, NC
64, joined Jun. 2013
|
The idea the Russians are behind it, is comical...
It is like the Democrats want a pass on what was leaked because it was the Russians...had the Russians not done this, we would have gotten away with it...lol
but when the source of the leaks comes out and says it was an insider...not Russians...
Perhaps the whole Russian outrage is simply deflection....
Quote:
President-elect Donald Trump again discounted the possibility that Russia was behind the hacking of U.S. political organizations, including the Democratic National Committee’s servers, despite evidence to the contrary.
All 16 government intelligence agencies and at least three private security firms have independently investigated the security breaches and concluded that the Russian government — in the words of the U.S. Intelligence Community — “directed” the hacking “to interfere with the US election process.”
|
| 1/30/2017 10:14:54 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
54, joined Mar. 2014
|
I'm still watching the situation unfolding before I make a judgment about the Russians.
I'm convinced the DNC was and presently is as corrupt as they say that republicans are.
They undeniably got busted, time may tell if that's the case regarding the Russians and the republicans.
Wiki leaks busted the republicans under Bush...when they LEAKED the truth about the wars...
I have no doubt Russians and other governments TRY to influence our elections...Hell the USA has a long track record for interfering with other countries around the globe...
So the fact there is some intelligence that lead to Russians trying to influence is likely TRUE...
it just does not have anything to do with Wiki leaks and the information they leaked....
[Edited 1/30/2017 10:15:14 AM ]
|
| 1/30/2017 10:18:27 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
Tough times for her,, America is getting better and she can't use lame stream media taking points with us lol poor city haha
oh, i wish that was the end of it but unfortunately there are many to step up their
lieinglooneyleftyliberalsocialistprogressivedimdumdems rhetoric.....just look at the
fishysmellinglefty above
|
| 1/30/2017 10:21:16 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
maggievalleymtn
Whiteville, NC
64, joined Jun. 2013
|
On Oct. 7 — a few months after WikiLeaks released a trove of DNC emails, but the same day WikiLeaks released emails of Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta — President Barack Obama’s administration said it was confident Russia was behind the cyberattacks.
"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations," read an Oct. 7 joint statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
The U.S. Intelligence Community consists of 17 agencies and organizations within the executive branch, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence speaks on the group’s behalf.
Their statement said releases of alleged hacked emails on DCLeaks.com and Wikileaks and by the online persona Guccifer 2.0 were "consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts."
"These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process," the statement said. "Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities."
|
| 1/30/2017 10:25:19 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
maggievalleymtn
Whiteville, NC
64, joined Jun. 2013
|
Your original statement a few posts above:
Quote from Nuftan:
"The idea the Russians are behind it, is comical"
Wiki leaks busted the republicans under Bush...when they LEAKED the truth about the wars...
I have no doubt Russians and other governments TRY to influence our elections...Hell the USA has a long track record for interfering with other countries around the globe...
So the fact there is some intelligence that lead to Russians trying to influence is likely TRUE...
it just does not have anything to do with Wiki leaks and the information they leaked....
|
| 1/30/2017 10:27:28 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
54, joined Mar. 2014
|
On Oct. 7 — a few months after WikiLeaks released a trove of DNC emails, but the same day WikiLeaks released emails of Hillary Clinton campaign chair John Podesta — President Barack Obama’s administration said it was confident Russia was behind the cyberattacks.
"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and institutions, including from US political organizations," read an Oct. 7 joint statement from the Department of Homeland Security and Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
The U.S. Intelligence Community consists of 17 agencies and organizations within the executive branch, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence speaks on the group’s behalf.
Their statement said releases of alleged hacked emails on DCLeaks.com and Wikileaks and by the online persona Guccifer 2.0 were "consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts."
"These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process," the statement said. "Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities."
They used the same methodology therefore they must be the same people?
WOW talk about REACHING...just how many methodologies do you think there are?
The only way they interfered is by making Hillary and the Democrats LOOK bad...
Here is a Pro Tip....
Do not do things that when uncovered make you look bad...problem solved...
[Edited 1/30/2017 10:28:02 AM ]
|
| 1/30/2017 10:29:47 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
nuffan
Kennesaw, GA
54, joined Mar. 2014
|
Your original statement a few posts above:
Quote from Nuftan:
"The idea the Russians are behind it, is comical"
Wiki leaks busted the republicans under Bush...when they LEAKED the truth about the wars...
I have no doubt Russians and other governments TRY to influence our elections...Hell the USA has a long track record for interfering with other countries around the globe...
So the fact there is some intelligence that lead to Russians trying to influence is likely TRUE...
it just does not have anything to do with Wiki leaks and the information they leaked....
Yes my statement is that the idea the Russians were behind the wiki leaks issue is COMICAL...
Wiki leaks is not some Russian conspiracy...nor are they PARTISAN...
|
| 1/30/2017 10:32:05 AM |
Against all odds Conservatism wins again | Page 9 |
|
clarity101
Aurora, CO
66, joined Oct. 2008
|
this is the realm in which the lieinglooneyleftyliberalsocialistprogressivedimdumdems
and their hypocrisy exist
Maher: Obama’s Dishonesty Was ‘Within the Normal Parameters’ – Trump’s Isn’t
by IAN HANCHETT27 Jan 2017
On Friday’s broadcast of HBO’s “Real Time,” host Bill Maher stated that untrue statements by President Obama were “within the normal parameters” while President Trump’s aren’t.
Maher began by saying, “We just can’t have a country ruled by what the president believes.”
Later on, Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist stated, “Obama said, repeatedly on the campaign, not once in a tweet, but again and again and again in speeches, that he was never going to raise taxes on anyone who earned less than $250,000 a year. That lasted 16 days, before he did.”
Maher responded, “Okay, but that’s within the normal parameters of what politicians do. Saying you see 3 million people that don’t exist is not.”
|