do you drive???
own a vehicle?

go to the doctor?
buy some food and drugs?

i see you wear glasses....
i assume you wear clothes when not posing for pics.
do you wear shoes?

do you use an outhouse or do you have running water? HOT water?
or do you PAY to have water delivered? by truck? or horse???

i see you on dh almost everyday that i am here.....do you have 'free' internet?
there must be cables and/or satellite handy????

do you live alone? wife? girlfriend/boyfriend? kids? do they visit you or do you
visit them???

ill bet there are roads and hiways not too far from where you live 'off the grid' for free.

What's to discuss ? No one cares if you want to shit in a hole in your back yard .

She implies I don't have the right to buy things or use services, because I oppose government.


Why do you talk to me at all?

She implies I don't have the right to buy things or use services, because I oppose government.


Why do you talk to me at all?

oh, nice............

another citydimwitlies robotic tactics.

i DID NOT imply anything of the sort. i asked how you plan or intend on living 'free'

i actually asked because i have a serious interest you dumbass.

This is the kind of crap that will get the focus of my scope dead on the BLM hate group.The woman in this article needs to be locked up or shot.

Semper Fi !!!

During a protest over the weekend, Black Lives Matter called for white people to give them their possessions and then proceeded to call for “killing people,” and “killing the White House.”

This outrageous speaker makes numerous highly inflammatory remarks, including:

“F*** white supremacy, f*** the U.S. empire, f*** your imperialist a** lives. That s*** gotta go.”

“And we need to start killing people. First off, we need to start killing the White House. The White House must die. The White House, your f****** White House, your f****** Presidents, they must go! F*** the White House.”

“White people, give your f****** money, your f****** house, your f****** property, we need it f****** all,” as another protester responds “reparations!”

“Pay the f*** up, pay the f*** up. It ain’t just your f****** time, its your f****** money, and now your f******* life is devoted to social change,”


Then the speaker goes to to state that she is a preschool teacher. What parent in their right mind would want this person around their child?

AND .......


Syria
Lebanon
Libya
Kuwait
Iran
Iraq
Sudan
Yemen

You cannot enter these Countries if you have a stamp on your passport from Israel .

Oh the irony !

Can someone quote my post .... Something City needs to learn .

Thanks Clarity.. One I had never seen before !

However, international politics professor Fawaz Gerges at London School of Economics said comparisons between America and Arab-Israeli relations “fly in the face of reality”.




“Trump’s ban is a Muslim ban, based on religious discrimination and racial discrimination. The relationship between Israel and its Arab neighbours is one of war since 1947 - for the last 70 years. By trying to force comparison, it just flies in the face of reality, it’s apples and oranges, sky and sea,” he told The Independent.

“The boycott of Israel by Arab nations is a completely different thing. The Arab world offered Israel a kind of a deal - a Palestinian state in return for normalised political relations. But we are not talking about these small warring states, we are talking about the leader of the free world, the defender of human rights. What Trump has done has undermined America as a moral voice in the world."


READ MORE
The biggest danger to America is Donald Trump, not refugees
“We are talking about blocking poor countries, that are war torn, they don't have the means and the ability to retaliate - what kind of options do they have against the US? That’s why Trump has chosen these states - Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan aren’t on the list because they have options.”

The US citizen also discredited claims Barack Obama took a similar approach in 2011 when he temporarily increased vetting measures of Iraqi citizens travelling to the US.

“What we need to understand is there a qualitative difference between the measures put in place between the Obama administration and the blanket ban put in place by Tru

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-muslim-ban-travel-ban-israel-six-seven-countries-blocked-us-president-bar-israeli-arab-a7555756.html

What BLM Really Thinks About White People
Terrorist Group Black Lives Matter: "We Need to Start Killing People"



BLM Protester calls for "Killing of White People" and for White People to Give them Our Money #sjw

https://youtu.be/4202ePmr9IU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4202ePmr9IU



BLM Finally Honest, Admits It Wants to Steal All White Peoples' Homes....

https://youtu.be/OA1qePWv110
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA1qePWv110

You do realize private property extends beyond just owning land?

Your car is private property...your sofa is private property...

your clothing is private property...

It's really sad seeing how quick American liberals, socialists, communists, democrats (same thing) have become such worthless, limp d*ck, jellyfish, traitorous shit eating dogs being more willing to side with their Nations enemies than their own.

Semper Fi !!!

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. put Iran "on notice" Wednesday after the Iranian military tested a ballistic missile and allied rebels in Yemen attacked a Saudi naval vessel in the Red Sea, an early manifestation of President Donald Trump's promise of a tougher American approach to the Islamic republic.

"Iran is now feeling emboldened," Michael Flynn, Trump's national security adviser, told reporters.

Delivering his first public remarks since Trump took office, Flynn didn't elaborate on what actions the U.S. might take in response to Iran's missile test earlier this week. But he made clear the administration's view that President Barack Obama's strategy of containing Iran's destabilizing behavior while cooperating more closely on nuclear and other matters wasn't working.

"The Obama administration failed to respond adequately to Tehran's malign actions — including weapons transfers, support for terrorism and other violations of international norms," Flynn said.

Asked to clarify what Flynn meant by putting Iran "on notice," White House press secretary Sean Spicer said, "We felt as though their actions were both provocative and in violation."

The statement makes "sure that they understood that we weren't going to sit by and not act on those actions," Spicer said.

Reports of the missile test emerged after Trump signed an executive order last week temporarily suspending immigration from Iran and six other majority-Muslim countries.

As part of the final negotiations for the 2015 nuclear agreement between Iran and six world powers, Iran agreed to an eight-year extension of a U.N. ban on ballistic missile development. The U.N. Security Council later endorsed the agreement, calling on Iran not to carry out such tests. But Iran has flouted the prohibition regularly in the past year-and-a-half, drawing sanctions from the U.S. but also diplomatic cover from Russia.

Iran's Defense Minister Gen. Hossein Dehghan on Wednesday acknowledged the latest test and said "we will not let any foreigner meddle with our defense issues." He did not say when the test was carried out or specify the type of missile but insisted it wasn't a violation of U.N. resolutions or the 2015 nuclear accord.

Flynn argued otherwise, saying Iran specifically violated the U.N.'s ban on "activity related to ballistic missiles designed to be capable of delivering nuclear weapons, including launches using such ballistic missile technology."

The test ended with a "failed" re-entry into the earth's atmosphere, said a U.S. defense official, who wasn't authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Iranian-backed rebels in Yemen, meanwhile, claimed a successful missile strike on Tuesday against a warship belonging to a Saudi-led coalition fighting to reinstall Yemen's internationally recognized government. The media arm of the Shiite rebels, also known as the Houthis, said the vessel was believed to belong to the Saudi Arabian navy.

Although Flynn didn't argue that Tehran was violating the nuclear accord, his promise of a sterner American approach to Iran underscored the fragility of a deal that Trump repeatedly ridiculed as a presidential candidate.

Flynn said: "President Trump has severely criticized the various agreements reached between Iran and the Obama administration, as well as the United Nations - as being weak and ineffective."

At America's request, the U.N. Security Council held a session Tuesday to address the missile test. The council referred the matter to its committee on Iran and asked for an investigation.

Iran has long boasted of having missiles that can travel 2,000 kilometers (1,200 miles), putting much of the Middle East, including Israel, in range. Such capability would also put U.S. bases in the region in danger, and Iran says its missiles are key to deterring a U.S. or Israeli attack.

In March, Iran test-fired two ballistic missiles. One was emblazoned with the phrase "Israel must be wiped out" in Hebrew, sparking international outcry.

Actually no you can't...

If you have personal possessions YOU OWN them PRIVATELY...

You want to live in a world where someone who works hard has exactly the same as someone who refuses to work at all...

GREAT...go find a country that will allow that...


It will never happen in the USA...

Umm, I don't want to insult your intelligence but, an equipped work station is often possessed by a steward whom is granted dominion of that which is provided.

We know how to behave civilized, most do it as a matter of family structure, ie.. I often have had and do make use of many resources I do not own, nor need to.

Our immature fear of others taking advantage of our hard work is exactly what enslaves us to being disadvantaged/retarded. Perhaps you, nuff, do not realize your intoxication that has you fighting for the front seat of last place car. Chuckle. The truth is sobering.

Private property capitalism is the "forbidden fruit" and is the enemy of state.

I have been given unto a parable to share.

We have 20 racers that split into two separate groups for ten-lap timed qualifying races. The ten in group-A beat and bang their way all the way to the checker flag and some may not even make it while even the winner has been damaged and progress and performance slowed. Group-B runs nose to tail like a freight train right to and beyond the checker. Not even a scratch at the finish on any of the ten competitors in group-B. The winner of Group A has a slower qualifying time/speed then even the last place competitor in the unblemished cooperatively aerodynamically advantaged group B.

Group-A displayed Laissez faire capitalism and raced only for personal victory at all cost even at a personal risk sustained damage in effort to beat and or eliminate competitors. Group-B displayed the democratic Christian communist principle. One for all and all for one. The entire group-B outperformed even the winner of group-A.

The entire group of capitalists do not qualify in the top ten performers. All ten democratic communists survive and thrive.

Cast of Characters

Group A: (Embryo of gods)

1st place through 9th place.....The elite one percenters. They start up front in the newest and most advanced proven equipment and are virtually unchallenged the entire race. Includes some passengers which otherwise would not be in this group. Senior public and corporate administrative executives. The Vatican.

10th place......The other ninety nine percent of the population. Various stages of upper middle economic classes, surplus labor, economically disenfranchised and physically disadvantaged classes. The enslaved classes. Many in this group have no idea that they are limited to at best the front seat of the last car by the deliberate intentions and leverages of the one percent advantaged. Many have been tricked into believing that they are unfairly limited by and supporting their fellow enslaved passengers in the back seat instead of the one percent. Nobody in this car can enjoy the ride as it is a constant uncivil battle to just maintain a seat in hopes of an enjoyable ride.


Group B: (Infant of LORD God)

Equal citizens of civilization. Mature, evolved, and survived.

huh????

democratic Christian communist principle. One for all and all for one.

whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat???

Communism, a branch of socialism, is an experimental social system based on a set of ideals that, at first glance, seem to agree with some biblical principles. On closer examination, however, little evidence can be found that the Bible truly supports or endorses communism. There is a difference between communism in theory and communism in practice, and the Bible verses that seem to comply with communist ideals are in fact contradicted by the practices of a communist government.

There is a surprising sentence in a description of the church in Acts 2 that has led many people to wonder whether the Bible supports communism, and has led some people to defend strongly the idea that communism is actually biblical. The passage reads, “All the believers were together and had everything in common. Selling their possessions and goods, they gave to anyone as he had need” (Acts 2:44-45). This statement seems to imply that communism (which has, at its heart, a desire to eliminate poverty by “spreading the wealth around”) is found here in the earliest of Christian churches. However, there is a crucial difference between the church in Acts 2 and a communist society that must be understood.

In the Acts 2 church, the people were giving to each other out of their own good will to those who had a need, and they were giving freely, without regulation of how much they were to give. In other words, they shared what they had out of a shared love for one another and a common goal—living for Christ and glorifying God. In a communist society, people give because a system of government forces them to give. They don’t have a choice in the matter as to how much they give or to whom they give. This, therefore, does not reflect on who they are; it says nothing about their identity or character. Under communism, the cheerful, generous giver and the stingy man are both required to give exactly the same amount – namely, everything they earn.

The issue is one of cheerful giving (which the Bible supports) versus forced giving. Second Corinthians 9:7 says, “Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.” After all, the Bible contains a great number of references to helping the poor, being generous with what we have, and looking out for those who are less fortunate. When we obey in this area with cheerful hearts with the proper motivation, our giving is pleasing to God. What is not pleasing to God is giving out of compulsion, because forced giving is not giving out of love and therefore profits nothing in the spiritual sense. Paul tells the Corinthians, “If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing” (1 Corinthians 13:3). Loveless giving is the inevitable result of communism.

Capitalism is actually a better system, when it comes to giving, because it has proven to increase individual wealth, which allows its citizens to give out of their increase. Communism has proven to simply make all its citizens poor, except the very few in power who decide where the wealth goes. But even capitalism won’t work, by itself, as a system for aiding the poor. It depends on its citizens to be diligent (Proverbs 10:4) and generous with the fruits of their labor (1 Timothy 6:18) and to give out of love for God and neighbor. Thus, we see that God has designed for the physical and financial needs of the poor to be met by Christian individuals, rather than by any system of government.