I already told you shill, you clowns have officially been DEBUNKED, and unless you have something that honestly contradicts Barry Jennings testimony, then i'm not discussing that subject anymore. Key thing is that you clueless dumbf**k shills don't understand is, Barry Jennings had ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to fabricate his story until close to the time of his death when he tried changing his story due to threats received from one of your f*ggot assed bosses.From the get-go, your f*ggot assed witness hess has lied because because he was warned to go along with the governments bullshit story

You didn't appear to answer the question srv...why?

Quote from higgy51:
And how about you tell us who these French scientists were?


Come on srv, please try to debunk your own kind and prove that Hess was NOT on LIVE TV at 11:57, it is important because if you cannot or will not, in then proves that the 'explosions' they heard are constant with the Towers collapsing.

This is very critical srv, because we have the PROOF of LIVE TV that puts both Hess and Jennings out of the building before noon and not 1pm as you state. It also puts Jennings saying they were trapped for SEVERAL HOURS in jeopardy too doesn't it?

Come on srv, please do try to debunk that above....and please don't come back with another angry rant just because your Jennings has been shown to be a fabricator of the truth.


TWO things for you to do, very simple:

Prove the French scientists claim.

Prove Hess was NOT on LIVE TV at 11.57

Unless you can do that, well......

You have no real answer 911 was an inside job other than to blame the Jews. Furthermore, there is no evidence physical or otherwise that supports your claim Jews were behind 9/11 except for mere speculation or the BS anti-semitism you attempt to pass off as some sort of evidence. And how ironic that for someone who claims to be a Christian, you've had no problem expressing a judgmental attitude that is a hypocricy to your own faith.

Fun

The ball??? Was it a new military craft of some sort, who knows. Whatever it was ( ball or missile ) it was fired or shot at a prepositioned spot on each tower.....so when it hit it blew out a cookie cutter image of some plane.

When the media added the CGI image of the plane....we can never forget how the left wing of the fake plane dissapeared before the tower swallowed the plane....I mean before impact lol.

Seeings how you've yet to have figured out how to upload photos, here ya go. Have at it srv63!. And while your at it, don't forget to insert the proper timeline (not your own). That's if you and 57channels can tear yourselve's away from having to "pull it" so much.

Do you molesters have SOLID PROOF of hess being on live tv at 11:57am on 9/11? Maybe something like a clock showing the time at the bottom of the tv screen since it was supposedly a live interview? No? I didn't think so because every moron saying that he was on live tv at 11:57am is a LIAR, you molesting shills as well

Seeings how you've yet to have figured out how to upload photos, here ya go. Have at it srv63!. And while your at it, don't forget to insert the proper timeline (not your own). That's if you and 57channels can tear yourselve's away from having to "pull it" so much.

TWO things for you to do, very simple:

Prove the French scientists claim.

Prove Hess was NOT on LIVE TV at 11.57

Unless you can do that, well......

No, we don't have that proof, but your proof should come from your own conspiracy sites that said he was in their vain attempt to dismiss the NIST time frame claim. All they have done is ridiculed you and your Jennings time frame and by claiming everyone saying 11:57 is a liar, you are calling your own people liars. Well done, way to go and debunk YOUR OWN KIND!!

http://www.911truth.org/the-911-interview-with-michael-hess-evidence-that-nist-lied-about-when-he-and-barry-jennings-were-rescued/

I must find that your disgusting claims of us being molesters is way below the belt and is so immature, it is beyond belief.

Now srv, what about these FRENCH scientists?

It is noted that you do keep avoiding the question, as you do most questions, especially when you have been proven to be wrong.

No balls srv, no balls to admit your errors.

Not laughing, just smirking at the stupidity while waiting for srv to answer the questions and prove the French connection he so loudly claimed.

Srv? Let me give you some advice, just admit that you were WRONG about the French scientists, it will be easier than being made to look like a stupid redneck that ain't got a clue what he is talking about.

Can you debunk the time-frame yet srv?

Can you debunk the photo you posted on was NOT part of the clean up campaign and why was only ONE cut sideways and the others were flat?

You know retard, it wouldn't make a shit if we had a full confession from your jew brothers that they pulled off 9/11 and murdered all of my fellow americans, your dense, retarded a** would still insist that the confession was bogus. Go eat your fellow shills bowel movement(like your sister pronologic) and i hope you choke on it.

He is lost at sea on his stupid claims. He flounders around hoping to come up with some insignificant point that he can use to try and save some credibility.


Chasing his illogical and insignificant desperation has become immensely tedious, and we both know he can't, and won't PROVE a damn thing.

It's funny creampuff, i don't see YOU proving a damn thing, only running your mouth because that is all your capable of. Mommy must be so proud

If YOU were a site superintendent like you CLAIM, then i wouldn't have to SCHOOL YOU on the DO's and DON'Ts of a construction atmosphere where as heavy columns are being removed. Common sense is mainly what would be required which you show to clearly lack, therefore PROVING your a LIAR when you claimed to have been some big shot boss on a construction site.It must really suck being a loser that can't find a REAL JOB but instead your paid to go on a dating website and try to deceive people in the forums with your lies and deceit. Mommy must be so proud huh.

I know a bit more about your lying a** than you think creampuff. Hows business been lately? Picking up yet?

YOU want me to prove that thadiagonal cut on that main column in the photo posted was not done by the cleanup crews? THAT'S EASY DOUCHE. WHERE is the SLAG on the front of the column?

That's right dim-wit, the slag is on the OUTSIDE of the column,PROVING WITHOUT A DOUBT THE CUT WAS MADE FROM THE INSIDE OF THE COLUMN!!!!!

Tell me GENIUS, HOW did the cleanup crew cut from INSIDE of the column? HUH? Maybe one of the guys crawled inside the column to make that cut, sure that's what happened huh

So your a project manager now?

YOU are the ONLY one that believes your "tripe"

So, you don't understand why slag ran down the front of the column, so...THERMATE!!!!

And there is your failure in logic.

No I said I WAS (comprehension?), and whether you believe it or not is immaterial and irrelevant. Please try to keep to the topic and avoid such infantile distractions and evasions. Your evasive tactics are obvious.

Can you PROVE that the cut was NOT made by the clean up crews?

No.

Thus endeth the lesson.

I sure wish my mummy could have gave me the fancy education to learn them really big fancy words. NOT

We will just wait until the real brain of your crew, the parrot shows up to answer us why it is that the slag ended up on the OUTSIDE of the column. I'm sure he will atleast TRY to explain it

I see your still clueless on how this works shill.

All i have to do is present strong evidence that contradicts your employers nist report

then i leave it up to "the readers" to use their own intellect to form their own opinion.

So far, i'm doing pretty damn well if i say so myself

I sure wish my mummy could have gave me the fancy education to learn them really big fancy words. NOT?