SRV

Could it be because they cowered down when their lives were threatened and said whatever they were told?
======================================================
Its called the game of life. I'm sure there are some that say " F**k you and stick your threats up your a** " soooooo then they threaten their family members....and then its 99-100% the fix is in...I will say or do whatever you want. It has been that way since the beginning of man.........and always will be.

The rich and powerful will always get their way. First they try and buy them off I think, then they blackmail them if they cant buy them off, and last they threaten them or kill them or their families.

The ones that claim to have seen a plane hit the pentacon ARE paid plants, no doubts in my mind.When interviewed, their testimony was ripped to shreds and proven wrong.

The ones that claim to have seen a plane hit the pentacon ARE paid plants, no doubts in my mind.When interviewed, their testimony was ripped to shreds and proven wrong.

Quote from tragicparrot:
I'll allow yasureoktoo to speak for himself. Oh, and BTW, i'm of pure German descent, dumb ass. So where's your credibility pertaining to 911? Is it in this post or the next one?
========================================

Are you claiming there is no such thing as German Jews?

No such thing as German Zionists who deny jewish involvement in 911 14 years later?

Equivocate much?

e·quiv·o·ca·tion
/i?kwiv?'kaSH(?)n/
noun

1. the use of ambiguous language to conceal the truth or to avoid committing oneself; prevarication.

"I say this without equivocation"

Question is, why would you agree with the accounts of hess and catalano? Could it be because they cowered down when their lives were threatened and said whatever they were told?

Prog, those sum up the content of SRV's posts beautifully!

Logic and reason. You believe stories that are just crazy and illogical. I don't discount the accepted version of events purely because I have an inherent mistrust of government. That would be absurd. I use logic and reason to determine the validity of an hypothesis, and that is why none of your stories stand up to scrutiny.

Try not to focus on the individual and do try to stick to the topics. These evasive tactics are boring.

Yep, your little b*tch shill is progressing nicely huh.Is she the pivot man?

s but you CANNOT explain how 6 of them are fine and dandy in Saudi Arabia.

Do i need to go on?

To ALL of the shills(except the retarded one with the IQ of a cartoon),

We are still waiting on you to PROVE that Barry Jennings HEARD and WITNESSED explosions in WTC7 AFTER the collapse of WTC1. If you cannot prove this then that means there is no way in hell that the official government bullshit story can be true claiming that the collapse of Word Trade Tower 1 is what started the TINY office fires in WTC7, therefore debunking your retarded governments story that office fires caused WTC7 to collapse.

We are waiting on you idiots to explain this away. PROVE me wrong then we will move on to the pentacon as well as the shanksville HOAX where you will be PROVED wrong again

For US, Israel’s nuclear arsenal is the elephant in the room
The nuclear game
For US, Israel’s nuclear arsenal is the elephant in the room

In order to hold a sound debate, it is said, opposing sides must first have an agreed-upon set of facts, a common view of what constitutes reality. It’s no surprise, then, that debates about nuclear arms in the Middle East – including over Iran’s contentious nuclear programme – tend to run amok.

In this case, the reality in the region is that only one country, Israel, maintains a stockpile of the world’s most dangerous weapons. Despite this being exposed in 1986 by an Israeli whistle-blower, Mordechai Vanunu, Israel has never acknowledged its arsenal, estimated to be between 80 and 200 bombs. In what has since become the official line on its nukes, then-deputy defence minister Shimon Peres told US president John Kennedy in 1963: “Israel will not be the first to introduce nuclear weapons to the Middle East” – leveraging an almost comically narrow definition of the word “introduce”.

More curiously, Israel’s main backer, the United States, won’t acknowledge reality either.(((BECAUSE WERE CONTROLLED BY ZIONIST JEWS ))) Since a late-1960s agreement with Israel, US officials, ranging from members of Congress to nuclear scientists, are barred from publicly acknowledging Israel’s nuclear arsenal.

Last year, an analyst at a US government nuclear lab lost his job after mentioning Israel’s nukes in an academic journal article.

That ridiculous dynamic, however, may be giving way to tacit acknowledgement. A quiet shift occurred recently when the US defence department released a previously classified 1987 report on Israel’s nuclear research. It came to light as part of a Freedom of Information lawsuit by Grant Smith of the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy.

Issued by the Pentagon-funded Institute for Defence Analysis (IDA), the report suggests US complicity in Israel’s development of its nuclear capabilities. William Greider, writing for The Nation magazine (to which I am a contributor), reported that the IDA’s findings “seem to hint at a copy-cat process in which the US government((ZIONIST CONTROLLED)) either actively helped or at least looked the other way while Israel borrowed or purloined technologies to establish a parallel nuclear system that looks a lot like America’s”.

The report doesn’t state outright that Israel has the bomb, but describes in detail an Israeli nuclear infrastructure of immense proportions.

The timing couldn’t be worse for Israel. Tensions with the US are high and prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is feverishly working every lever of influence in America to block a potential nuclear deal with Iran.

Israel is the world’s most outspoken critic of Iran’s nuclear programme and a vociferous opponent of the diplomacy between Iran and world powers, including the US, to peacefully constrain that programme.

(((ZIONIST HYPOCRITES!!!)))Israel persistently calls for heightened transparency with regard to Iran’s programme – for example, by denouncing the reported deal on the table now for not going far enough. But what one academic calls “nuclear opacity” stands as a weak spot in Israel’s activism on Iran. Avner Cohen has said the policy is “anachronistic, even counterproductive”; indeed, the Iranians haven’t shied away from exploiting the hypocrisy as a propaganda cudgel against their regional foes.

After Mr Netanyahu’s speech to US Congress earlier this month, Iranian president Hassan Rouhani lashed out at the contradiction. “People of the world and America are too smart to take advice from [Israel],” he said, “which has pursued, produced and stockpiled a large number of atomic bombs in violation of international laws and away from the eyes of international inspectors.” Iran, he noted, is – unlike Israel – a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Because of its complicity in keeping Israel’s nuclear secret, the US takes a propaganda hit, too. Not least of the US aims at stake is that of a Nuclear Weapons-Free Zone in the Middle East. While Africa, Latin America, the South Pacific, South-east Asia and Central Asia have agree to go nuke-free, one of the world’s most explosive regions can’t even kick-start its conversation because of Israel’s posture.

OH.......if the so-called hijackers used fake IDs---- how could the President name off all 19 of them within a couple days??????? You just debunked yourself Was the President lying???

My god, even you can't be this dumb can you?

How did he know the names of the all the people that died?

PASSENGER LISTS you dumb shit!!

When they book tickets and book in, they give their NAMES.

These names are put on a LIST.

They are also put into the SEATING plans.

You really are dumber than the most moronic human being alive!

Time to debunk again. You have used the average to obtain your 26%, however, the mark is closer to 32% and not 26%. (229 as a % of 762 is 30.05%)

You also use JULY as the benchmark, which is different to September when the schools are back in session and it was a week after a holiday! Not to mention that early morning flights are always lower than afternoon ones.

Anyway, here you are debunked again:



Excluding the hijackers, then Flight 11 had 76 passengers out of a capacity of 158, a load factor of 48.1%. The average over Tuesdays on the past three months is reported as "almost 39%", so the 9/11 flight was noticeably higher.

Flight 77 had 53 passengers out of a capacity of 176, a load factor of 30.1%. The average over Tuesdays on the past three months is reported as 32.8%, so the 9/11 flight was a little lower.

Flight 93 had 33 passengers out of a capacity of 182, a load factor of 18.1%. The average over Tuesdays on the past three months is reported as 52.8%, so the 9/11 flight was vastly lower, in fact the lowest at any time in that three month period.

Flight 175 had 51 passengers out of a capacity of 168, a load factor of 30.3%. The average over Tuesdays on the past three months is reported as 49%, so the 9/11 flight was considerably lower, although there were two flights during that three month period when it was lower still.

Overall, then, we have one flight with an above average load factor; one marginally below average; one well below average, though still within the range of other flights in the preceding 3 months; and one with the lowest load factor during that period.

My god, even you can't be this dumb can you?

How did he know the names of the all the people that died?

PASSENGER LISTS you dumb shit!!

When they book tickets and book in, they give their NAMES.

These names are put on a LIST.

They are also put into the SEATING plans.

You really are dumber than the most moronic human being alive!

9/11: Israel's Grand Deception
Source: Mask of Zion


http://www.abeldanger.net/2015/03/911-israels-grand-deception.html

by Jonathan Azaziah
Friday, September 17, 2010

When an event occurs that changes the dynamics of the geopolitical spectrum, there is only one question that needs to be asked, no matter what kind of information is being force-fed to the public by the Zionist media: Who does this event benefit? The answer to this question is always: the Zionist elite. The official story presented to the masses in the laughable (and criminally false) 9/11 Commission Report, overseen by Zionist Philip Zelikow, is so dubious and so nonsensical in its arrogance, it is truly amazing that the story was swallowed by the world's population as truth to begin with. It doesn't take a scientist, an architect, or an engineer to determine that something other than planes brought down the Twin Towers and Building 7 at free-fall speed on that infamous day. Al-Qaeda, Arabic for 'The Base' (because it was the CIA's base of operations in Afghanistan), was not behind the September Eleventh attacks – the Mossad and its Zionist criminal network were. Wake up.


Shocking Prediction or Evidence of Planning? ((ZIONIST JEWS EXPOSED AS PERPS ON 9/11!!))

On September 23, 1979, a very disturbing interview took place between Zionist Michael D. Evans and founder of the Mossad, Isser Harel. Evans asked the former director of the Mossad if (Islamic) terrorism will eventually come to America. Harel proceeded to tell the American Zionist that terrorism will indeed come to the United States: the attack will take place in New York City, and it will be on its tallest building (1).

Isser Harel was asked to step down from his post as Mossad chief by the architect of al-Nakbah and notorious racist David Ben-Gurion, because his terrorist tactics were drawing too much attention to the Zionist State. Harel was behind the failed Lavon Affair of 1954, in which Egyptian-Israeli agents placed bombs inside British, American, and Egyptian targets, hoping Muslim groups would be blamed and Western relations with Egypt would be irrevocably damaged. He was also responsible for 'Operation Damocles', which left scores of German scientists, writers, and public officials dead under the guise of 'Nazi-hunting' (2). After his resignation and subsequent 'retirement', Harel remained involved with Mossad, serving as a consultant and advisor to the terrorist agency before it released any information to the public (3).



continued:
Lies, Myths, and Propaganda of the Official Story

Any independent investigator's looking into the events leading up to, occurring during, and following 9/11, will automatically lead to their being labeled with the inflammatory and degrading title of 'conspiracy theorist'; however, a closer look at the evidence proves it is the ludicrous official story that is the only real conspiracy theory.

What the Zionist media has led the masses to believe is that 19 Muslim men, under orders of mastermind Osama bin Laden, with funding from various Muslim charities that were fronts for terrorist operations, hijacked 4 planes with box cutters; bypassed the $400 billion air defense system of the United States; flew the planes into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, with another plane going down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania; the Twin Towers then collapsed, followed by Building 7 (which wasn't struck by a plane, but collapsed anyway) several hours later.

CONTINUED

As usual, you don't grasp at what is being said.As i had ALREADY STATED with the one passport (for example)that was stolen in 1995, there WOULD be an alert already put out on that passport as well as the ID.Supposedly, there were ATLEAST 7 of the 19 supposed hijackers carrying them fake/stolen passports but yet NONE get detained and they are allowed to go on their merry way.I DO NOT buy it!

As far as your bullshit of inter-state flying goes, a picture ID like a drivers license is the bare minimum required to fly and even the DPS office is going to require some other form of ID such as your passport to be able to retain a drivers license.

While Fun is working on your request, i would like PROOF that Barry Jennings COULD NOT have heard or experienced explosions in WTC7 until AFTER WTC1 collapsed

Fun, as I have already told you, as soon as you start banging on about the jews and some f**king religious shit, I pass you by...many do.

No-one is interested in your religious chants.

I tell you what you can do though, here is a challenge for you.

You mention that no muslim names were found on the passenger lists.

I challenge you to prove that. Produce the passenger lists.

You and I both know she won't come back with anything, she never does. She and you are alike, you just keep going round and round and avoid the awkward questions and requests for proof.

You had had proof with the time frame given to you. He wasn't in the wtc7 until after it was evacuated, that is why no-one was in the OEC.

The ONLY time frame we know of Jennings was that he was on his way to work when the 1st plane hit. We have no other time frames from him, so It is now up to you to produce your own timeline.

Why do you keep going around in circles about this? You know you cannot prove Jennings heard the explosions before the collapse and to be very honest with you, neither can we prove he didn't hear them. The only thing we have 'on our side' is the time frames already shown to you and you cannot and have not come up with anything to the contrary.

In case you forget, Hess admitted he heard no explosions.

Jennings was a muslim and therefore he was a paid plant by the terrorists to make it look as if the Government was to blame; that is so obvious.

That is why we know she won't come back because she will fail to rise to the challenge.

She is like srv, she dances away and changes the subject or keeps coming back with regurgitated shit again.

I must admit I did laugh at his, once again, very lame threat of the Pentagon and Shanksville. When did we first hear that.....100 pages ago? lol

We do know for FACT that Barry Jennings was inside of WTC7 for awhile BEFORE WTC1 collapsed because in his eyewitness testimony, he stated "firefighters came to help rescue him but then they RAN AWAY then they came back but this time with more concern on their faces then they RAN AWAY again". Anyone with common sense would take each of them "ran aways" as when each tower was collapsing, would you not agree? If you don't agree then i would like to hear another explanation of why the firefighters "ran away"