8/11/2015 6:41:30 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
markjetson
Albuquerque, NM
59, joined Jan. 2013
|
Dr Griffin has published over 30 books...how many have you written or published ...shill,... what 0, that's what I thought, GTFO
Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
|
8/11/2015 6:43:44 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Dr Griffin has published over 30 books...how many have you written or published ...shill,... what 0, that's what I thought, GTFO
You don't know what I've published Dipshit. You're arguing from authority and that is a logical fallacy.
So Jetson, GTFO. LOLOL What a foolish response.
Hey, I noticed you completely ignored Higgy's question. Why is that? Because griffin got it wrong that is why. So much for your High Priest.
[Edited 8/11/2015 6:45:59 PM ]
|
8/11/2015 7:20:40 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Quote from higgy51:Because it totally debunks their "hero" Mr Jennings. Even Hess does that, but to them, he's a liar and a scared man. I suppose they will say this of Peruggia too.
So, apparently, we're to disregard the accounts of Peruggia, Hess and Catalano (where they conflict with that of Jennings) for no viable reason other than to confirm a story that explosives were deployed in 7WTC seven hours before the collapse, which supposedly was caused by another round of charges placed within the building that were able to withstand the heat from seven hours of fire?
How can anyone think this illogical scenario makes sense?
Tell us just one thing here shill.If Mr Barry Jennings is Not being truthful in his accounts of what happened in building 7 (WTC7),what would he gain by being a liar like all of your witnesses? He gave his testimony of accounts IMMEDIATELY after being rescued and NOT ONCE wavered from his story for years UNTIL months before his death he asked that the part where he said that they had to step over dead bodies in the lobby of building 7 to be able to escape, which i'm sure his familys life was threatened.How many millions did Barry Jennings make off of his eyewitness testimony shills?Keep in mind too that if Barry Jennings was lying in his interview immediately after being rescued,wouldn't he be worried about mr hess's accounts of the story contradicting Barry's accounts to where Barry would be tagged a disgraceful liar on national tv that very same day of 9/11? Take your bullshit witnesses and their fake assed deceitful testimony and stick it shill,noones buying what you have to say anymore!!
Do tell me something shill.The next time you shills go to pick up your paychecks from your puppet master boss, ask him who the dead bodies were in the lobby of building 7 that Barry Jennings had to step over to escape building 7.Were them dead bodies that of all of the police officers that Barry Jennings said he saw when entering building 7 (WTC7) that morning or were them the bodies of the explosive experts that silverstein hired to demolish the building.The demolition team that rigged the explosives to building 7 probably sensed that the jew silverstein would probably try to get rid of them as liable witnesses so the demolition team had a fail safe rigged to the charges so that only they could detonate the charges but then the jew silverstein already killed them therefore explaining why it took 7 more hours for the jew to get another demo expert to take over and demolish the building.Maybe my view is far fetched and maybe not, but sure the hell no more ridiculous than your bible saying that building 7 came down due to TINY office fires.
Anymore bullshit you want to spew?
|
8/11/2015 7:32:29 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
longbobby
Lufkin, TX
55, joined Aug. 2010
|
|
8/11/2015 8:17:52 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
@ Bobby and Funwithmusic,
After america has had their revolution to take their country back and after we have hung ALL of the traitors in office as well as the puppet masters, then we can destroy the streets in front of the washington monument,the lincoln building and the whitehouse that form the shape of the jewish star. You would be surprised how many americans are unaware of that.
|
8/11/2015 10:57:44 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
longbobby
Lufkin, TX
55, joined Aug. 2010
|
[Edited 8/11/2015 10:58:08 PM ]
|
8/12/2015 12:16:32 AM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
As usual, i don't think that you caught her true meaning by her statement. She opened a new door/new direction to research
Stop talking bullshit, she hasn't opened any doors, she's just closed them on herself as it proves for 100% that she has NO idea or clue as to the days events.
Strange how she hasn't returned isn't it? She knows she's just a stupid woman without any research skills.
|
8/12/2015 12:20:13 AM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
higgy51
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012
|
I did as you told me (laughing) and stopped just after the time you mentioned about the garbled time - although I heard nothing different to his normal voice, but it sounded as if he wanted to HIDE the time he was about to mention.
One point though. He said he broke a window, looked left and they were still standing, looked right and they had gone.
How did he see the Towers from the NORTH side of WTC7?
Can you explain that SRV, please? How can he see the Towers from the NORTH side of the building?
Well srv?
How can he see the Towers from the NORTH side of the WTC7?
Where is the timeframe of him being in the building that differs from those supplied by NIST AND OTHER witnesses...like the Fire Chief?
|
8/12/2015 5:01:41 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
57channels
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008
|
higgy
Where is the timeframe of him being in the building that differs from those supplied by NIST AND OTHER witnesses...like the Fire Chief?
=======================================================
Time frame????? After 14 years I think the feds can change just bout anything that the Jewish bankers want changed?? Fire chief????? You talking bout the fire chief on the scene right after the missile hit the Pentacon? He said there was nuttin to imply a jet hit the Pentacon...no wings, fuselgae, engine, ect.ect. -- and then after the feds threatened him or his family...he said' Oh yeah it was all there "
Just curious......did Jim Miegs or Gerald Posner fart you out???
|
8/12/2015 5:24:20 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
57channels
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008
|
Mark
Dr Griffin has published over 30 books...how many have you written or published ...shill,... what 0, that's what I thought, GTFO
===================================================
cl-ASS and the other 2 kiddies and juma have cut down every truth seeking Patriot out there. Every engineer, pilot, scientist, scholar, veteran, architect for truth about 9-11. Its their job.
They are govt. hired stooge robots whose only purpose in life is to : FOLLOW ORDERS
|
8/12/2015 5:27:03 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Tell us just one thing here shill.If Mr Barry Jennings is Not being truthful in his accounts of what happened in building 7 (WTC7),what would he gain by being a liar like all of your witnesses?
Now this has to be the highlight of my day for stupidity.
MY witnesses...cute
Now Hess and Catalano are liars just because their testimony doesn't gel with your retarded story. Of course you have no evidence as usual.
God, you really can't be that stupid. What a time wasting wanker.
[Edited 8/12/2015 5:28:57 PM ]
|
8/12/2015 5:28:26 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
cl-ASS and the other 2 amazing debunkers and juma have cut down every lie telling lunatic out there with amazing logic and reason.
FTFY.
|
8/12/2015 5:29:46 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Well srv?
How can he see the Towers from the NORTH side of the WTC7?
Where is the timeframe of him being in the building that differs from those supplied by NIST AND OTHER witnesses...like the Fire Chief?
You want me to explain what Jennings meant when he said " He said he broke a window, looked left and they were still standing, looked right and they had gone." I don't know what that means yet, guess i have a bit more research to do do figure it out. By the way, what makes you think that he was only on the north side of WTC7 the whole time?
|
8/12/2015 5:35:27 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
If Mr Barry Jennings is Not being truthful in his accounts of what happened in building 7 (WTC7),what would he gain by being a liar like all of your witnesses?
I love this logic fail. It needs re-posting.
|
8/12/2015 5:38:46 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Well srv?
How can he see the Towers from the NORTH side of the WTC7?
Where is the timeframe of him being in the building that differs from those supplied by NIST AND OTHER witnesses...like the Fire Chief?
You want me to explain what Jennings meant when he said " He said he broke a window, looked left and they were still standing, looked right and they had gone." I don't know what that means yet, guess i have a bit more research to do do figure it out. By the way, what makes you think that he was only on the north side of WTC7 the whole time?
Btw higgy, why does Barry Jennings mention in his testimony that after the stairs exploded out from under him on the 6th floor then he worked his way up to the 8th floor then he says it was "VERY,VERY,HOT". WTC7 has not caught on fire yet higgy so what the hell was going on on the 8th floor that made it so damn hot that Barry Jennings was fixing to risk killing himself to throwing the firehose out of the window so that he could climb down it to safety?
Lets hear it higgy. If you don't know the answer then ask that jew that signs your paycheck because i really would like the answer. Could the 8th floor have been one of the floors where the thermite was used to sever the main columns in WTC7 that held up the building?That's what i'm thinking
|
8/12/2015 5:42:22 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Could the 8th floor have been one of the floors where the thermite was used to sever the main columns in WTC7 that held up the building?
No. Would you be interested in a full technical discussion of the collapse of 7WTC?
|
8/12/2015 5:43:42 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
I been slamming your ignorant a** with SOLID EVIDENCE for a week now shill so when are you going to debunk it? Oh i forgot, YOU CAN'T
|
8/12/2015 5:45:38 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
If your going to tell me that TINY office fires caused the building to collapse? No i'm not interested in your bullshit explanation
|
8/12/2015 5:49:45 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I been slamming your ignorant a** with SOLID EVIDENCE for a week now shill so when are you going to debunk it? Oh i forgot, YOU CAN'T
Uh, it has been debunked soundly. Jenning's timeline is obviously wrong, and just because you refuse to accept that Jennings is out, doesn't mean it isn't true.
You haven't debunked anything since you arrived.
a) Primer???
b) Rust???
c) Tin???
None of these specious claims have any supporting evidence. You can't explain your claims so you move on and claim victory. Sorry but that is a colossal FAIL.
|
8/12/2015 5:52:12 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
If your going to tell me that TINY office fires caused the building to collapse? No i'm not interested in your bullshit explanation
I would discuss the physics and the technical nature of the collapse. I would discuss the claims of AE911T in comparison to what is already known. I would use sources provided from various universities as well as the NIST report. We could discuss why you think the NIST report is a fraud.
That's how I would approach it.
Perhaps you're not up to it?
|
8/12/2015 5:53:48 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I been slamming your ignorant a** with SOLID EVIDENCE for a week now shill so when are you going to debunk it? Oh i forgot, YOU CAN'T
Is labelling Catalano and Hess liars without evidence 'slamming my ignorant ass'?
|
8/12/2015 6:05:11 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I been slamming your ignorant a** with SOLID EVIDENCE for a week now shill so when are you going to debunk it? Oh i forgot, YOU CAN'T
If that is so, why do you avoid the fact that the evacuation order was given at 9:45?
This is a crucial point in the timeline that greatly inconveniences your hypothesis. To just say the NIST report is a lie just doesn't cut it.
|
8/12/2015 6:12:24 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
longbobby
Lufkin, TX
55, joined Aug. 2010
|
|
8/12/2015 6:16:24 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
I love this logic fail. It needs re-posting.
I love your logic as well where you say TINY OFFICE FIRES caused the steel columns in WTC7 to collapse. ONLY an idiot with less IQ of a retarded person would go along with your logic
|
8/12/2015 6:19:10 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I love your logic as well where you say TINY OFFICE FIRES caused the steel columns in WTC7 to collapse. ONLY an idiot with less IQ of a retarded person would go along with your logic
No-one said 'TINY OFFICE FIRES'. Jesus Christ! Why do feel the need to lie all the time? Seriously, you only make yourself look untrustworthy and mendacious. I spend more time arguing your libel and lies than I do actually discussing the material in question.
It's f**king boring. LIFT YOUR GAME.
Again, because your comprehension is appalling along with your logic:
'I would discuss the physics and the technical nature of the collapse. I would discuss the claims of AE911T in comparison to what is already known. I would use sources provided from various universities as well as the NIST report. We could discuss why you think the NIST report is a fraud.'
Now, what did you not understand? I swear you just come here to f**k people around.
[Edited 8/12/2015 6:21:44 PM ]
|
8/12/2015 6:29:59 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Are we talking about the nist report that doesn't even mention building 7 (WTC7) and why he came down PERFECTLY INTO ITS OWN FOOTPRINT? As far as your other crock of shit sources that are either bought off or lives threatened, i'm not interested because i have heard and seen enough f**kin lies to last a lifetime.
Btw, if you even had half of a brain to even understand the basics of physics, we would not be on opposite sides of the fence. The FACT is, your a f**kin paid shill and it's your job to TRY and discredit any opposition to your retarded assed nist report and the RETARDED F**KS that wrote it. Your puppet masters are some dumb mother f**kers to even think they could pull off murdering americans on 9/11 and then completely get away with it and not get caught. Tell them f*ggot jews for me, judgement day IS COMING
|
8/12/2015 6:37:35 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Show me a BLAZING INFERNO inside of WTC7 that caused the building TO COLLAPSE PERFECTLY.Lets see the INFERNO shill, i forgot you can't because THERE WASN'T AN INFERNO!!! Show me that bad assed super hot TINY office fires that caused the building to collapse and i will show you MANY INFERNOS but yet the buildings STILL STAND!!!!! Are you ready shill?????
|
8/12/2015 6:48:10 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Btw,noone said there were tiny office fires in WTC7,not you or your bullshit nist report and maybe not your witnesses or them so called experts that you use to try debunking us Truthers. I as well as other Truthers look at them pathetic fires in WTC7 which are CAUGHT ON VIDEO AS PROOF and we see scattered TINY FIRES.Any newcomer to this thread can google the fires in WTC7 and see the EXACT same thing that we do and they will also come to the conclusion that them fires were TINY!!!!! Do you want to keep going on this subject shill because i don't think there's anything of your a** left after the last DEBUNK you got
|
8/12/2015 7:01:35 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Have you noticed that parrot wants nothing to do with this conversation anymore on what caused the explosions in WTC7 BEFORE WTC1 collapsed? It's because parrot knows DAMN WELL that you shills have NO WAY IN HELL of explaining Barry Jennings EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY of EXPLOSIONS in WTC7 BEFORE it was able to catch on fire!!!!!YOUR A** HAS BEEN OWNED SHILL SO ACCEPT IT
|
8/12/2015 11:08:54 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
longbobby
Lufkin, TX
55, joined Aug. 2010
|
|
8/13/2015 6:48:53 AM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
tragicparrot
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014
|
Have you noticed that parrot wants nothing to do with this conversation anymore on what caused the explosions in WTC7 BEFORE WTC1 collapsed? It's because parrot knows DAMN WELL that you shills have NO WAY IN HELL of explaining Barry Jennings EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY of EXPLOSIONS in WTC7 BEFORE it was able to catch on fire!!!!!YOUR A** HAS BEEN OWNED SHILL SO ACCEPT IT
Oh, i've been keeping up here. I just don't feel the need to converse with someone who's only agenda here is to make a complete a** of himself.
Yeah, I know, you meant to state something else...
By the way 3 1/2 stooges, i'm still waiting on your bullshit to debunk Barry Jennings EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY of EXPLOSIVES in WTC7.
Changed to this...
I'm not making shit up shill. My statements are still the same, only difference is explosions were heard and witnessed in WTC7 BEFORE the controlled demolition of WTC1.
Now instead of dancing around avoiding the question, tell us what the hell caused the explosions in WTC7
|
8/13/2015 4:23:35 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
So parrot, i guess it is more important to you to prove that i used the wrong word (explosives instead of explosions) when describing Barry Jennings testimony of explosions in WTC7 before WTC1 even got close to collapsing?
Wouldn't it be more worth your while to find something to debunk Mr Barry Jennings eyewitness testimony, which by the way never changed?
Your gonna have to come up with something soon parrot to help your fellow shills because so far, even with their best efforts of deception, it looks like you shills as well as your nist report are in serious jeopardy of being debunked
|
8/13/2015 5:03:29 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Are we talking about the nist report that doesn't even mention building 7 (WTC7) and why he came down PERFECTLY INTO ITS OWN FOOTPRINT?
This tells me you've never read it, and you don't have a clue. In addition, it tells me you're not up to debating the subject.
a). It does 'mention' 7WTC repeatedly and it discusses the collapse sequence in detail.
b). I've already demonstrated that it didn't fall in its own footprint as the meme states.
Can anyone from 9/11 truth this site debate the technical details of the 7WTC collapse?
|
8/13/2015 5:11:32 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Btw,noone said there were tiny office fires in WTC7,not you or your bullshit nist report and maybe not your witnesses or them so called experts that you use to try debunking us Truthers. I as well as other Truthers look at them pathetic fires in WTC7 which are CAUGHT ON VIDEO AS PROOF and we see scattered TINY FIRES.Any newcomer to this thread can google the fires in WTC7 and see the EXACT same thing that we do and they will also come to the conclusion that them fires were TINY!!!!! Do you want to keep going on this subject shill because i don't think there's anything of your a** left after the last DEBUNK you got
And another rant. Please stop as I don't read them. I'm not in the least interested in your uneducated opinion. Just the facts.
|
8/13/2015 5:11:34 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
This tells me you've never read it, and you don't have a clue. In addition, it tells me you're not up to debating the subject.
a). It does 'mention' 7WTC repeatedly and it discusses the collapse sequence in detail.
b). I've already demonstrated that it didn't fall in its own footprint as the meme states.
Can anyone from 9/11 truth this site debate the technical details of the 7WTC collapse?
I guess in its own footprint means somewhere on the surface of the Earth. If it fell perfectly into its own footprint, it probably wouldn't have crossed the road. Maybe it's some kind of invisible footprint, like the hologram planes.
|
8/13/2015 5:13:14 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I guess in its own footprint means somewhere on the surface of the Earth. If it fell perfectly into its own footprint, it probably wouldn't have crossed the road. Maybe it's some kind of invisible footprint, like the hologram planes.
Maybe the buildings went for a little walk and left footprints all over Manhattan.
Man, I re-read this entire thread over the weekend. You win the prize for the best posts.
I was pissing myself laughing!
[Edited 8/13/2015 5:16:24 PM ]
|
8/13/2015 5:15:34 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Have you noticed that parrot wants nothing to do with this conversation anymore on what caused the explosions in WTC7 BEFORE WTC1 collapsed? It's because parrot knows DAMN WELL that you shills have NO WAY IN HELL of explaining Barry Jennings EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY of EXPLOSIONS in WTC7 BEFORE it was able to catch on fire!!!!!YOUR A** HAS BEEN OWNED SHILL SO ACCEPT IT
And another brain dead rant claiming victory without evidence. You haven't been able to address my concerns with any degree of competence, so the original hypothesis stands.
You're a light-weight SRV and you're not very good at it.
|
8/13/2015 5:18:03 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
progrocknic
Mount Arlington, NJ
31, joined Dec. 2012
|
Maybe the buildings went for a little walk and left footprints all overt Manhattan.
Man, I re-read this entire thread over the weekend. You win the prize for the best posts.
I was pissing myself laughing!
Thanks. I try to be as entertaining as possible. I almost think of it as practice. Truthers have no problem offering plenty of idiotic comments to rip on, and I do love ripping on stupid comments. There's a reason Idiocracy is my favorite movie. People have no idea how close we actually are to watering our plants with Gatorade.
|
8/13/2015 5:19:12 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Thanks. I try to be as entertaining as possible. I almost think of it as practice. Truthers have no problem offering plenty of idiotic comments to rip on, and I do love ripping on stupid comments. There's a reason Idiocracy is my favorite movie. People have no idea how close we actually are to watering our plants with Gatorade.
|
8/13/2015 8:11:14 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
You claim that i claim victory without evidence shill? How about you do a search on Barry Jennings-9/11 on youtube and watch every one of the videos, unless your afraid to, then you will have to face the fact that your chicken shit nist report which was put together by a bunch of bought off flunkies, lied to you MASSIVELY.
It must suck being on a losing team
|
8/13/2015 8:13:56 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
You claim that i claim victory without evidence shill? How about you do a search on Barry Jennings-9/11 on youtube and watch every one of the videos, unless your afraid to, then you will have to face the fact that your chicken shit nist report which was put together by a bunch of bought off flunkies, lied to you MASSIVELY.
It must suck being on a losing team
And another brain dead rant. You ignore ALL the contradictory evidence that denotes Jennings testimony is questionable.
I've watched all the videos; read all the testimony and you still fail in a grandiose style, as you're unable to address the holes in your story.
All your Bullshitting can't change that fact.
[Edited 8/13/2015 8:14:27 PM ]
|
8/13/2015 8:16:12 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
I see you ignored 'the hard stuff' again.
Quote from srv63:
Are we talking about the nist report that doesn't even mention building 7 (WTC7) and why he came down PERFECTLY INTO ITS OWN FOOTPRINT?
The reply:
This tells me you've never read it, and you don't have a clue. In addition, it tells me you're not up to debating the subject.
a). It does 'mention' 7WTC repeatedly and it discusses the collapse sequence in detail.
b). I've already demonstrated that it didn't fall in its own footprint as the meme states.
Can anyone from 9/11 truth this site debate the technical details of the 7WTC collapse?
[Edited 8/13/2015 8:16:30 PM ]
|
8/13/2015 8:32:09 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
To ALL of the deceptive, lying shills,
Since none of you CANNOT debunk Barry Jennings on his eyewitness testimony that proves WTC1 could not have caused any fires in WTC7, your bullshit nist report as well as yourselves are officially debunked and i'm not debating that subject anymore unless you come up with CONCRETE EVIDENCE to the contrary.
Now a very simple question for you shills.Did the main columns in WTC1 as well as WTC2 bend or melt when supposedly weakened by the fires in the buildings? Answer cautiously because yes, there's another debunking coming
|
8/13/2015 8:37:31 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from srv63:To ALL of the deceptive, lying shills,
Since none of you CANNOT debunk Barry Jennings on his eyewitness testimony that proves WTC1 could not have caused any fires in WTC7, your bullshit nist report as well as yourselves are officially debunked and i'm not debating that subject anymore unless you come up with CONCRETE EVIDENCE to the contrary.
Now a very simple question for you shills.Did the main columns in WTC1 as well as WTC2 bend or melt when supposedly weakened by the fires in the buildings? Answer cautiously because yes, there's another debunking coming
Barry Jennings is debunked by Hess and Catalano. Simple. Your rhetoric is bullshit.
LOLOL, you're claiming victory without having discussed the holes in your story.
Seriously?
Hey Higgy! There's yet another supposed 'debunking' coming that won't happen. This should be another anti-climax!
|
8/13/2015 8:49:19 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Your failing to understand something shill.No matter how hard you try pushing the timeline forward of Barry Jennings that day, it still wont change the FACTS of his testimony that the explosions in WTC7 were BEFORE WTC1 collapsed. Accept it dude. You are clearly debunked and your bullshit made up nist report is a hideous lie. Another thing that is FACT. Your retards in gooberment have been changing their stories many times since 9/11 but yet Barry Jennings accounts have never wavered.America had already lost trust in their government before 9/11 but since then, they have lost all hope as well and see now how truly evil and desperate the government really is. Is it no wonder why America believes the Truth Seekers now and have absolutely no trust for government? Like i said, your playing on a losing team shill
|
8/13/2015 8:52:39 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
naprinciple
West Plains, MO
46, joined Feb. 2014
|
Srv, do you honestly think you're arguing with a person who will concede a single point that may call the official narrative into question?
|
8/13/2015 8:54:36 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
I notice you have not answered the question shill.Could it be you don't want to give the wrong answer therefore risking another debunking?
|
8/13/2015 9:02:38 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from srv63:
Your failing to understand something shill.No matter how hard you try pushing the timeline forward of Barry Jennings that day, it still wont change the FACTS of his testimony that the explosions in WTC7 were BEFORE WTC1 collapsed.
Jennings is irrelevant in light of the other testimony and known facts. I don't have any faith in his testimony owing to the plethora of material that contradicts his testimony.
Accept it dude. You are clearly debunked and your bullshit made up nist report is a hideous lie.
I know it's not perfect, no investigation ever is, but to make a statement like that merely demonstrates that your bias influences your reason, and that you have a poor grasp of reality.
You haven't read it and you've made statements regarding the report that denote you are unaware of the content. So, when you make dumb accusations of then report being false blah, blah, I can't, and never will take you seriously because you don't even know what's in it.
Please think for yourself for once.
Another thing that is FACT. Your retards in gooberment have been changing their stories many times since 9/11 but yet Barry Jennings accounts have never wavered.
"My retards in government"???-Dumb. What stories have changed? You just saying so means shit, and just because new information may come to light and Jenning's tale never wavers doesn't make him right, now does it?
America had already lost trust in their government before 9/11 but since then, they have lost all hope as well and see now how truly evil and desperate the government really is.
Everyone should mistrust the government, but that doesn't mean they committed 9/11. Furhtermore, I don't believe 'evil' in its truest sense exists, but that is the subject of a philosophical thread, and beyond the capabilities of this site.
Is it no wonder why America believes the Truth Seekers now and have absolutely no trust for government? Like i said, your playing on a losing team shill
"Truth Seekers"???
Please...the rhetoric...it burns with stupidity...please stop as it's making me sick.
I'm not playing on any team except that of reason and logic. Try it sometime, as it truly elevates one above the herd.
|
8/13/2015 9:03:10 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Srv, do you honestly think you're arguing with a person who will concede a single point that may call the official narrative into question?
I know it Na, but it is fun knowing that an unbias third party can go thru this thread and comments and see us Truthers making the paid shills cower and slither away after their desperate attempts of deception,lies and innuendo fail miserably
|
8/13/2015 9:06:52 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from srv63:I notice you have not answered the question shill.Could it be you don't want to give the wrong answer therefore risking another debunking?
a). It's a dumb question.
b). I'm not falling for your distraction here. You do this all the time.
c). You present a claim without evidence
d). Attack those who can see the failings and flaws
e). Continue with a & b, then claim victory when you're in a corner.
f). Move on in the hope that no-one notices.
F**k you Douche, I'm not letting you get away with such mendacious tactics. LIFT YOR GAME!
|
8/13/2015 9:09:17 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from srv63:I know it Na, but it is fun knowing that an unbias third party can go thru this thread and comments and see us Truthers making the paid shills cower and slither away after their desperate attempts of deception,lies and innuendo fail miserably
Noprinciples, you are such a coward. Why don't you address the evidence instead of lobbing empty headed ad homs?
Gutless Douchebag. Hiding behind the block.
[Edited 8/13/2015 9:09:54 PM ]
|
8/13/2015 9:10:21 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
Quote from srv63:
Your failing to understand something shill.No matter how hard you try pushing the timeline forward of Barry Jennings that day, it still wont change the FACTS of his testimony that the explosions in WTC7 were BEFORE WTC1 collapsed.
Jennings is irrelevant in light of the other testimony and known facts. I don't have any faith in his testimony owing to the plethora of material that contradicts his testimony.
Accept it dude. You are clearly debunked and your bullshit made up nist report is a hideous lie.
I know it's not perfect, no investigation ever is, but to make a statement like that merely demonstrates that your bias influences your reason, and that you have a poor grasp of reality.
You haven't read it and you've made statements regarding the report that denote you are unaware of the content. So, when you make dumb accusations of then report being false blah, blah, I can't, and never will take you seriously because you don't even know what's in it.
Please think for yourself for once.
Another thing that is FACT. Your retards in gooberment have been changing their stories many times since 9/11 but yet Barry Jennings accounts have never wavered.
"My retards in government"???-Dumb. What stories have changed? You just saying so means shit, and just because new information may come to light and Jenning's tale never wavers doesn't make him right, now does it?
America had already lost trust in their government before 9/11 but since then, they have lost all hope as well and see now how truly evil and desperate the government really is.
Everyone should mistrust the government, but that doesn't mean they committed 9/11. Furhtermore, I don't believe 'evil' in its truest sense exists, but that is the subject of a philosophical thread, and beyond the capabilities of this site.
Is it no wonder why America believes the Truth Seekers now and have absolutely no trust for government? Like i said, your playing on a losing team shill
"Truth Seekers"???
Please...the rhetoric...it burns with stupidity...please stop as it's making me sick.
I'm not playing on any team except that of reason and logic. Try it sometime, as it truly elevates one above the herd.
I still see no answer to my question shill. Are we waiting for the higgy to get here or can you answer on your own?
|
8/13/2015 9:13:14 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
You say Na is a gutless douchebag because he has you blocked? It's funny that you also had me blocked at one time so what does that make you?
|
8/13/2015 9:16:50 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from srv63:You say Na is a gutless douchebag because he has you blocked? It's funny that you also had me blocked at one time so what does that make you?
But I didn't follow you around posting behind your back, and having re read this thread over the weekend, I can say that in all confidence. I blocked you because of your objectionable behaviour. I've come to terms with the fact that you are just an offensive person.
|
8/13/2015 9:19:45 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from srv63:I still see no answer to my question shill. Are we waiting for the higgy to get here or can you answer on your own?
Is that the game now? I see no response to my points, are you waiting for Noprinciples to direct your sophistry? How's that for playing your dumb game? Grow up.
Dude your bickering is boring. How many posts will you make that say nothing? LOLOL I'm still waiting for you to address your earlier lies.
I'm not falling for your distractions. How many times will I have to repost this so it will sink into your thick skull?
[Edited 8/13/2015 9:22:16 PM ]
|
8/13/2015 10:30:35 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
57channels
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008
|
Is a sign of weakness and insecurity. A last ditch effort to try and make the insecure weak person feel like he has won the debate or name calling exchange. One who desperately needs a security blanket to try and lower his or her low self esteem.
|
8/13/2015 10:33:17 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
57channels
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008
|
I, I, I, I guess I was referring to you cl-ASS on that last message I posted. Help is available....but 1st step is opening up closed mind or quitting job as govt. stollie pigeon.
|
8/13/2015 11:01:07 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
srv63
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012
|
@57,
I told you WTC7 was the smoking gun that will debunk the bs nist report as well as these shills. Have you noticed that they have NOTHING to disprove Barry Jennings and all they can do is try to move the timeline? If their timeline was right, that would mean Barry Jennings lives about 1 1/2 hours 1 WAY from work.Who the hell is going to drive that far to get to work? Besides that, i have more to punch holes in their timeline as well.
Btw shills, if your reading this:
Get off of your lazy asses and do some research on where Barry Jennings lived at the time of 9/11. Hint: was not too far from WTC7
|
8/13/2015 11:06:33 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from 57channels: Is a sign of weakness and insecurity. A last ditch effort to try and make the insecure weak person feel like he has won the debate or name calling exchange. One who desperately needs a security blanket to try and lower his or her low self esteem.
57, it's a joke because SRV uses it in every post. We do it for shits and giggles. There's no need to go overboard, and if you paid attention to the thread you would know that.
[Edited 8/13/2015 11:09:46 PM ]
|
8/13/2015 11:07:53 PM |
WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them! |
|
class5
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014
|
Quote from srv63:
Btw shills, if your reading this:
Get off of your lazy asses and do some research on where Barry Jennings lived at the time of 9/11. Hint: was not too far from WTC7
As if that means anything on such a morning as 9/11. His testimony is not corroborated by that of others, or the known timeline of events. Where he lived is immaterial.
You're not really thinking today.
[Edited 8/13/2015 11:10:53 PM ]
|