Select your best hookup:
Local
Gay
Asian
Latin
East Europe

megapersonnels

In spite of years of female empowerment, there s a bit of a myth that girls shouldn t speak initially on dating apps. chicago hookup sites Nevertheless, it surely brings something diverse to the dating game. She recently asked two males she was texting for Facetime chats before meeting in individual, one thing she would not have accomplished pre pandemic. busty asian girls We asked a range of folks to inform us about their experiences with on line dating, like how extended they ve been on the app, their successes, their challenges, and which app worked for them.

mega personnel com

If your partner doesn t know, you may want to disclose this information and facts on your initially date. 100 free arab dating websites I referred to as him a few occasions in the taxi to say it s more than, I don t want to speak to him once again. But when you obtain on line, an Angel spits in Donald Trump s meals. themeredith onlyfans As soon as determined monetarily eligible, we will review your claim to decide if you are permitted rewards under the Oklahoma Employment Security Act.

Home  Sign In  Search  Date Ideas  Join  Forums  Singles Groups  - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!


8/26/2015 5:43:15 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
You wouldn't be conscious to ring any ambulance, creampuff. Stay away from getting physical, you might break a nail.




Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!

DateHookup.dating - 100% Free Personals


8/26/2015 5:51:48 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
tragic

Remember when I asked you this question way back on page 182?

""57channels. How is it that enough airliner debris could be trucked in to suddenly fool thousands of people without anyone having noticed? Photographs, video's, and witnesses all proved there was no shortage of debris to be found within minutes after the attack...""

Seeings how you've already ignored numerous simple questions throughout this entire thread, how about answering this one first, then i'll answer yours? Fair enough?
=======================================================
Your talking about the tiny pieces of tin or aluminum that were planted on the lawn of the Pentagon??? There were people in suits and ties and women in dresses walking in a line at the Pentagon picking up very small pieces of debri. That in itself is a crime.......tampering with evidence...but Im sure none of them were arrested -- now were they? They were just doing their job picking up tiny pieces of the missile that struck the Pentagon...so the FBI didnt have to do it later...is my best guess.


I was referring to all of it, including the engine found on Murray St. As for the Pentagon wreckage, had there been anything other than an airliner that struck it, its doubtful the damage would have extended beyond the Pentagon.

Quote from 57channels:
No one is saying the perps aren't extremely arrogant and brazen. They have proved that beyond any reasonable doubt with the 19 Arab hijacker spinpropaganda fairytale. However.......they know they better plant a piece of a plane here and there and dump off an engine on Murray street to fool the average joe six pack whose brainlessness has him scream to nuke all Arab countries. They haven't fooled the open minded Patriotic truth seekers who long for the truth, accountability, and life in prison sentences for the perps that plotted 9-11, carried it out, and then covered up the whole rotten mess.


57channels?

8/26/2015 5:59:33 PM  

naprinciple
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (10,590)
West Plains, MO
46, joined Feb. 2014


Parrot, is their any part of the official story you don't buy?

8/26/2015 6:29:01 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from naprinciple:
Parrot, is their any part of the official story you don't buy?


Sure, for about 4 years post 911 I had several. Why? Do you have something of significance that might back up 57channels claims the aforementioned aircraft parts were planted in and around ground zero or the Pentagon?

8/26/2015 6:34:35 PM  

naprinciple
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (10,590)
West Plains, MO
46, joined Feb. 2014


Quote from tragicparrot:
Sure, for about 4 years post 911 I had several. Why? Do you have something of significance that might back up 57channels claims the aforementioned aircraft parts were planted in and around ground zero or the Pentagon?




***********************************



Nope, I really don't care to argue details. It's actually amazing how many times I catch myself doing just that My only wish is that people honestly look into all government claims for themselves

8/26/2015 7:28:43 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,135)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


1 question for you tragic...a simple yes or no please

If the perps that pulled off 9-11 ordered NIST and Popular Mechanics and the 9-11 Commission to say that the big bad wolf huffed and puffed and blew the towers down....would you also believe that?? Yes or No?????
========================================================
Your turn there tragic....a yes or a no please

8/26/2015 7:44:02 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
1 question for you tragic...a simple yes or no please

If the perps that pulled off 9-11 ordered NIST and Popular Mechanics and the 9-11 Commission to say that the big bad wolf huffed and puffed and blew the towers down....would you also believe that?? Yes or No?????
========================================================
Your turn there tragic....a yes or a no please


That was the dumbest question you've asked to date. Wow, no wonder you believe stories of flying orbs and the like.



8/26/2015 7:56:10 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from naprinciple:
Quote from tragicparrot:
Sure, for about 4 years post 911 I had several. Why? Do you have something of significance that might back up 57channels claims the aforementioned aircraft parts were planted in and around ground zero or the Pentagon?




***********************************



Nope, I really don't care to argue details. It's actually amazing how many times I catch myself doing just that My only wish is that people honestly look into all government claims for themselves


According to this link, which I posted earlier on in 265, the 911 investigation is still open.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/03/25/911-fbi-investigation/70423820/

Should there be anything of question pertaining to whether or not our government had any direct or indirect involvement of 911, I can assure you i'd be more than happy to look into it. What pisses me off however, is when people like 57channels etc make erroneous assumptions that present more of a distraction rather than being in anyway instrumental in seeking out the truth.

8/26/2015 8:01:18 PM  

longbobby
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (64,006)
Lufkin, TX
54, joined Aug. 2010


The fact that you don't know what thermite or thermate is has been gone over and over and over again...so why are you still here ?

Just because you lie and deny doesn't turn a truth into an untruth.

But; you know; I can't help but think that you are talking about yourself...being inbred; and an instigator; and into bestiality and all. Typical traits of your people; after all. Seems like sheepherding is all ya'll ever did in the Old Testament, that is when you weren't getting in over your heads with the Assyrians.

8/26/2015 8:08:49 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from longbobby:
The fact that you don't know what thermite or thermate is has been gone over and over and over again...so why are you still here ?

Just because you lie and deny doesn't turn a truth into an untruth.

But; you know; I can't help but think that you are talking about yourself...being inbred; and an instigator; and into bestiality and all. Typical traits of your people; after all. Seems like sheepherding is all ya'll ever did in the Old Testament, that is when you weren't getting in over your heads with the Assyrians.


I see your referring to srv63. Please tell us more.

8/26/2015 8:25:19 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from tragicparrot:
I see your referring to srv63. Please tell us more.


Wow, Tragic, that was a dumb rant. That guy is a lunatic.

8/26/2015 9:10:16 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
I see your referring to srv63. Please tell us more.


So your going to attack me since i'm the only one not here at the time? I call that cowardly and i will enjoy dropping the hammer on your molester a** that much more now.

Are you ready to answer my last simple question so that i can start dropping that hammer now?

8/26/2015 9:30:00 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from tragicparrot:
Sure, for about 4 years post 911 I had several. Why? Do you have something of significance that might back up 57channels claims the aforementioned aircraft parts were planted in and around ground zero or the Pentagon?


They automatically assume without foundation that we've never examined the event from the truther angle. I became interested in the subject over eight years ago after reading truther points and wanting answers to the same questions. Subsequent investigation exposed truther canards as lies and as poorly researched stories that aren't plausible motivated by blind hate and not reason.

Basically, we are dealing with people who aren't truthers out of intellectual curiosity, but people who use 9/11 to vent their hate, and logic isn't very important to them.

It's just another example of the limitations of 'truther logic' (oxymoron?).



[Edited 8/26/2015 9:30:50 PM ]

8/26/2015 9:33:34 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
So your going to attack me since i'm the only one not here at the time? I call that cowardly and i will enjoy dropping the hammer on your molester a** that much more now.

Are you ready to answer my last simple question so that i can start dropping that hammer now?


Sure didn't take you long to respond, which suggests to me you haven't been gone very long. What are you waiting for srv63? Drop that F'n hammer already!

8/26/2015 9:37:18 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
Sure didn't take you long to respond, which suggests to me you haven't been gone very long. What are you waiting for srv63? Drop that F'n hammer already!


The hammer is coming shorty but first, answer the question first below.

Is this use of a lance your idea or was it one of the most likely methods of cutting the column suggested by one of your shill wannabe debunking websites? Answer the question then this welder will be glad to show you why its IMPOSSIBLE for the lance to have made that cut and i will give you the 4 reasons why.

8/26/2015 9:38:52 PM  

longbobby
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (64,006)
Lufkin, TX
54, joined Aug. 2010


Quote from tragicparrot:
I see your referring to srv63. Please tell us more.
-------------------------------------------------------

Nope, talking about you and your inbred ilk.

"Evidence linking the Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the involvement of Israel in 911.

Classic government doublespeak; Yes Israel was involved in 911; No, we can't tell you about it because the evidence that links Israel to 911 is classified.

8/26/2015 9:50:08 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from longbobby:
Quote from tragicparrot:
I see your referring to srv63. Please tell us more.
-------------------------------------------------------

Nope, talking about you and your inbred ilk.

"Evidence linking the Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the involvement of Israel in 911.

Classic government doublespeak; Yes Israel was involved in 911; No, we can't tell you about it because the evidence that links Israel to 911 is classified.


If the future turns out like i believe, there wont be any such thing as "classified" anymore so the jews that pulled off 9/11 better start packing their bags for the long ride thru hell



[Edited 8/26/2015 9:51:28 PM ]

8/26/2015 9:53:40 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from longbobby:
Quote from tragicparrot:
I see your referring to srv63. Please tell us more.
-------------------------------------------------------

Nope, talking about you and your inbred ilk.

"Evidence linking the Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the involvement of Israel in 911.

Classic government doublespeak; Yes Israel was involved in 911; No, we can't tell you about it because the evidence that links Israel to 911 is classified.


If, as you just stated Israel was involved, how is it you've access to evidence that is considered "classified" information? And please do provide said evidence so that we might clear up any discrepancy once and for all.

Waiting.

8/26/2015 9:56:56 PM  

longbobby
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (64,006)
Lufkin, TX
54, joined Aug. 2010


Thanks for demonstrating the 88 IQ modern Israelis are known for.

8/26/2015 10:08:02 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from longbobby:
Thanks for demonstrating the 88 IQ modern Israelis are known for.


Evidence Israel was involved in 911 despite your claim such information was "classified"?

8/26/2015 10:09:25 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


How odd....a truther caught lying.

The above was sarcasm for those with comprehension problems.

8/27/2015 12:44:30 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,469)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:

Your talking about the tiny pieces of tin or aluminum that were planted on the lawn of the Pentagon??? There were people in suits and ties and women in dresses walking in a line at the Pentagon picking up very small pieces of debri. That in itself is a crime.......tampering with evidence.


You are dumb, it is not a crime as they were COLLECTING evidence, not tampering with it, you buffoon!!

8/27/2015 12:47:54 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,469)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from higgy51:

Now that has been said, care to try to debunk the time-frame provided by your own kind and the cast iron proof that due to the change of channels to the Taliban, that Hess was in fact being interviewed just before noon (and therefore debunking the NIST time frame claim)?


Noted that srv doesn't have the balls to address this request and one can only surmise with some degree of certainty the reason why he, once again, passes it by is because it debunks his hero's fantasy time-frame.

Another nail in the typical MO of a conspiracy Nutcase....if you don't like the question or the answer would prove you to be wrong or an idiot (both in some cases, 99% of those cases), they pass on by.

8/27/2015 5:05:52 AM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from higgy51:You are dumb, it is not a crime as they were COLLECTING evidence, not tampering with it, you buffoon!!


There is no hope for that one.



8/27/2015 6:46:10 AM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
So your going to attack me since i'm the only one not here at the time? I call that cowardly and i will enjoy dropping the hammer on your molester a** that much more now.

Are you ready to answer my last simple question so that i can start dropping that hammer now?


Amazing how many times you've referred to those who disagree with you as "shills" or "molesters" yet take offence whenever that table is turned against you. Well guess what srv63... That's life.

8/27/2015 11:43:29 AM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,135)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


I still think that cl-ASS would probably sell out the other two govt. stoolies [ tragic and higgy ] In fact......... would it surprize me if cl-ASS was adding 2 0's to 1 dolla bills to make a 1 dollar bill look like a 100 dolla bill.

You know ehen the 3 kiddies are crawling on their hands and legs trying to get as many 100 dolla bills that Dov Zakheim is tossing out the window of the limo. OH...who is that right behind Dov? Its lucky Larry Silverstein [ the Jewish scumbag who bought the WTC complex for pennies on the dolla [ knowing he was gonna have to get rid of all that asbestos which would cost him a small fortune to renovate the complex ] so lucky Larry took out a huge insurance policy against a terrorist attack and took in 5.5 billion. I said billion...not million.

But poor Larry died on 9-11 since he had breakfast in the towers every day way up high Oh wiat....wait...wait.....Lucky Larry Lucciano [ I mean Silverstien ] was seeing a doctor that mourning. Gosh is that traitor to humanity lucky huh??? The greedy jewish piece of dogs a** should be crucified upside down..oh well!!

8/27/2015 1:46:04 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
I still think that cl-ASS would probably sell out the other two govt. stoolies [ tragic and higgy ] In fact......... would it surprize me if cl-ASS was adding 2 0's to 1 dolla bills to make a 1 dollar bill look like a 100 dolla bill.

You know ehen the 3 kiddies are crawling on their hands and legs trying to get as many 100 dolla bills that Dov Zakheim is tossing out the window of the limo. OH...who is that right behind Dov? Its lucky Larry Silverstein [ the Jewish scumbag who bought the WTC complex for pennies on the dolla [ knowing he was gonna have to get rid of all that asbestos which would cost him a small fortune to renovate the complex ] so lucky Larry took out a huge insurance policy against a terrorist attack and took in 5.5 billion. I said billion...not million.

But poor Larry died on 9-11 since he had breakfast in the towers every day way up high Oh wiat....wait...wait.....Lucky Larry Lucciano [ I mean Silverstien ] was seeing a doctor that mourning. Gosh is that traitor to humanity lucky huh??? The greedy jewish piece of dogs a** should be crucified upside down..oh well!!


""Silverstein's insurance "scam"

It's been repeatedly reported that Larry Silverstein had insured the Twin Towers a year earlier, and it is more than "coincidental" that this insurance covered terrorist attacks. Further, Silverstein had numerous legal disputes that aimed to increase the payout by arguing that there were two separate attacks. To a first approximation, this was successful and Silverstein managed to claim approximately $4.6 billion.
Rebuttal: What conspiracy theorists don't mention about this is that the total cost of the towers was significantly in excess of this — the insurance value was way below what it should have been. Most of the legal wrangling after the fact was also due to the insurance contracts being incomplete. The total cost of the attack would be in the region of $7 billion or more, leaving a considerable cost once the relatively measly insurance payout was claimed. With too low an insurance value and less-than-solid contracts, literally none of the insurance-based activities seem to point to the actions of people who knew exactly what was going to happen in advance. If it was an insurance scam, it was the worst ever.
We've already noted that the World Trade Center had already been bombed once before in 1993, and that several major terror plots against U.S. landmarks had been uncovered since then. In light of this, an anti-terrorism insurance policy would appear to be an entirely logical purchase.""

""Hysterical do-gooders ensured there wasn't enough asbestos in the building.
This theory, proposed by none other than Andrew Schlafly, holds that "Big Government," Nanny-Statism, hysterical environmentalists, lawyers and do-gooders had ensured that spray-on asbestos was not allowed in the WTC buildings, thereby ensuring they were not properly equipped to resist the fires that engulfed the structures.
Rebuttal: This is moot: any fireproofing that was there was blasted or torn off the core by the initial impact and explosion. Asbestos protection (of any kind) would've proven useless.""

""The buildings were full of asbestos, and this was the least expensive way to get rid of it.
Rebuttal: This contradicts the previous claim. The argument is that if Larry Silverstein had removed the asbestos from the towers in the proper fashion, it would have cost him a huge amount of money, and officially demolishing the building would have been nearly impossible under New York City laws. So when he overheard that the powers that be were plotting to crash a couple planes into his towers, like any good tycoon he sensed an opportunity (asbestos removal paid for by the government!), not a threat (the government wants to destroy my building and they expect me to be on board?).
This is one of the few bases that truthers provide as a reason to plant explosives in a building that's going to be hit by planes: the towers had to go away completely, with no chance of being rebuilt.""

Source...

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/9-11_conspiracy_theories

Seems to me 57channels, that this makes one hell of a lot more sense than the outrageous stupidity you continue to post on an almost daily basis.

8/27/2015 3:05:44 PM  

longbobby
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (64,006)
Lufkin, TX
54, joined Aug. 2010


"Evidence linking the Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information." -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the involvement of Israel in 911.

Classic government doublespeak; Yes Israel was involved in 911; No, we can't tell you about it because the evidence that links Israel to 911 is classified.

8/27/2015 4:54:33 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
I still think that cl-ASS would probably sell out the other two govt. stoolies [ tragic and higgy ] In fact......... would it surprize me if cl-ASS was adding 2 0's to 1 dolla bills to make a 1 dollar bill look like a 100 dolla bill.

You know ehen the 3 kiddies are crawling on their hands and legs trying to get as many 100 dolla bills that Dov Zakheim is tossing out the window of the limo. OH...who is that right behind Dov? Its lucky Larry Silverstein [ the Jewish scumbag who bought the WTC complex for pennies on the dolla [ knowing he was gonna have to get rid of all that asbestos which would cost him a small fortune to renovate the complex ] so lucky Larry took out a huge insurance policy against a terrorist attack and took in 5.5 billion. I said billion...not million.

But poor Larry died on 9-11 since he had breakfast in the towers every day way up high Oh wiat....wait...wait.....Lucky Larry Lucciano [ I mean Silverstien ] was seeing a doctor that mourning. Gosh is that traitor to humanity lucky huh??? The greedy jewish piece of dogs a** should be crucified upside down..oh well!!


Wow, that said much, but nothing. Why don't you just post "I'm an Idiot" repeatedly? It would have the same effect, Moron.

You should stick with Baseball, it's the limit of your capabilities.





[Edited 8/27/2015 4:56:11 PM ]

8/27/2015 5:12:01 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,135)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


tragic

So when he overheard that the powers that be were plotting to crash a couple planes into his towers, like any good tycoon he sensed an opportunity (asbestos removal paid for by the government!), not a threat (the government wants to destroy my building and they expect me to be on board?).
==========================================================
????????? When he overheard????laughing:: You mean when he was talking to Netanyehu about having the fake art students [ Mossad ] get their secret passes to live there that summer and wire both towers from the inside so when the jet fired the missile into each tower....it blew out cookie cutter images of some stupid a** plane....a lousy job too I must say. But...........the cookie cutter image could have looked like Foghorn Leghorn........and CNN would have said it was a fat plane or Flight 175 was so full of jet fuel it couldnt have flown another foot

8/27/2015 5:13:43 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
tragic

So when he overheard that the powers that be were plotting to crash a couple planes into his towers, like any good tycoon he sensed an opportunity (asbestos removal paid for by the government!), not a threat (the government wants to destroy my building and they expect me to be on board?).
==========================================================
????????? When he overheard????laughing:: You mean when he was talking to Netanyehu about having the fake art students [ Mossad ] get their secret passes to live there that summer and wire both towers from the inside so when the jet fired the missile into each tower....it blew out cookie cutter images of some stupid a** plane....a lousy job too I must say. But...........the cookie cutter image could have looked like Foghorn Leghorn........and CNN would have said it was a fat plane or Flight 175 was so full of jet fuel it couldnt have flown another foot


57 has gone 'full retard'.



[Edited 8/27/2015 5:13:50 PM ]

8/27/2015 5:28:07 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,135)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

You are dumb, it is not a crime as they were COLLECTING evidence, not tampering with it, you buffoon!!
====================================================
You want to retract this foolish statement???? Now think about it higgy. People in suits and ties don't go to a crime scene and start picking up evidence of the crime That is tampering with evidence or stealing evidence. Since it was at the Pentagon--- thats the job of the FBI....not some Pentagon workers or whoever they were. Police or people in uniforms whose job it is to collect evidence and examine it.

8/27/2015 5:35:51 PM  

longbobby
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (64,006)
Lufkin, TX
54, joined Aug. 2010


If they had a conscience; perhaps they would feel guilty about aiding and abetting domestic terrorists and mass murderers; As they say, if you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem.

8/27/2015 6:14:11 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
You are dumb, it is not a crime as they were COLLECTING evidence, not tampering with it, you buffoon!!


If in the future you happen upon a crime scene, do your civic duty and help the cops pickup evidence from the crime scene.See how many lumps they will put on your head with their nightsticks and how many of them treat you like a punching bag. Guess what hotel your going to be spending your days in as well "buffoon"

8/27/2015 6:22:55 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
Amazing how many times you've referred to those who disagree with you as "shills" or "molesters" yet take offence whenever that table is turned against you. Well guess what srv63... That's life.


Understand something, anything you paid wh*res have to say against me, honestly doesn't phase me the least bit. When you attack a REAL AMERICAN like Barry Jennings and call him a liar because he refused to shut his mouth and stuck to his EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS of what really happened on 9/11 even tho knowing it might cost him his life well, when you attack his integrity, makes me want to knock the shit out of you cowardly molesters.

8/27/2015 6:32:37 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,135)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


SRV


If in the future you happen upon a crime scene, do your civic duty and help the cops pickup evidence from the crime scene.See how many lumps they will put on your head with their nightsticks and how many of them treat you like a punching bag. Guess what hotel your going to be spending your days in as well "buffoon"
======================================================
I don't think ole higgy has figured that out or he just had another huge brain fart...which seems to happen alot with him. Maybe cl-ASS wll rescue him with some long idiotic word only Bill Buckley would understand

8/27/2015 6:33:22 PM  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,337)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

You are dumb, it is not a crime as they were COLLECTING evidence, not tampering with it, you buffoon!!
====================================================
You want to retract this foolish statement???? Now think about it higgy. People in suits and ties don't go to a crime scene and start picking up evidence of the crime That is tampering with evidence or stealing evidence. Since it was at the Pentagon--- thats the job of the FBI....not some Pentagon workers or whoever they were. Police or people in uniforms whose job it is to collect evidence and examine it.





8/27/2015 6:34:47 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from longbobby:
If they had a conscience; perhaps they would feel guilty about aiding and abetting domestic terrorists and mass murderers; As they say, if you are not part of the solution, then you are part of the problem.


I'm assuming your talking about these wh*re bag shills. I'm looking forward to the day of reckoning which i do believe is right around the corner. I hope the shills get hung along side of their puppet masters. Shit, i will furnish all of the popcorn

8/27/2015 6:39:13 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
SRV


If in the future you happen upon a crime scene, do your civic duty and help the cops pickup evidence from the crime scene.See how many lumps they will put on your head with their nightsticks and how many of them treat you like a punching bag. Guess what hotel your going to be spending your days in as well "buffoon"
======================================================
I don't think ole higgy has figured that out or he just had another huge brain fart...which seems to happen alot with him. Maybe cl-ASS wll rescue him with some long idiotic word only Bill Buckley would understand


Higgy is an idiot but i think even he knows his bullshit is beyond belief. Don't worry about no-class, fancy pants probably getting her nails done.

8/27/2015 11:22:09 PM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Understand something, anything you paid wh*res have to say against me, honestly doesn't phase me the least bit. When you attack a REAL AMERICAN like Barry Jennings and call him a liar because he refused to shut his mouth and stuck to his EYEWITNESS ACCOUNTS of what really happened on 9/11 even tho knowing it might cost him his life well, when you attack his integrity, makes me want to knock the shit out of you cowardly molesters.


What good would silencing Jennings do when NIST had been working on the report for three years before his death? And really, is there any reason why our evil government would murder him, yet continue to allow numerous other 911 witnesses, for example: William Rodrequez, Michael Hess etc, to still roam the planet earth?

And please spare the Barry Jennings EYEWITNESS ACCOUNT malarky. This is only a sad attempt to gloss over your earlier claim that Jennings was an eyewitness to explosives. The only testimony he ever gave regarding explosives was that he heard and felt them with little to no idea as to where they had originated from, nor the actual time at which they occurred.

As for Jennings having lied about anything, perhaps it wasn't until after taking into consideration all the events that had occurred the whole time him and Hess were trapped inside WTC7, that he later realized where the explosions were actually coming from. Not only would that explain the timeline discrepancy, but also that WTC wasn't raised by controlled demolition because it hadn't collapsed until several hours after him and Hess were rescued.

Also, from the original transcripts, lets compare a couple small statements Jennings made from his first and second interview...

From his initial interview: ""Once I broke out the windows I could see outside below me. I saw police cars on fire, buses on fire. I looked one way, the building was there, I looked the other, the building was gone. I was trapped in there for several hours. I was trapped in there when both buildings came down.""

From his second interview:""The explosion was beneath me….so when the explosion happened it blew us back….both buildings (the twin towers) were still standing,” he added. I was trapped in there for several hours, I was trapped in there when both buildings came down - all this time I’m hearing all kinds of explosions, all this time I’m hearing explosions, said Jennings, adding that when firefighters took them down to the lobby it was in “total ruins”.""

Source > http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Barry_Jennings

Finally, neither Jennings nor Hess had any idea what had transpired outside the building they were trapped in, which, if allowed any reasonable amount of human error, would lend at least some credence to what they shared about being trapped inside WTC7.

8/28/2015 12:55:34 AM  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,732)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

You are dumb, it is not a crime as they were COLLECTING evidence, not tampering with it, you buffoon!!
====================================================
You want to retract this foolish statement???? Now think about it higgy. People in suits and ties don't go to a crime scene and start picking up evidence of the crime That is tampering with evidence or stealing evidence. Since it was at the Pentagon--- thats the job of the FBI....not some Pentagon workers or whoever they were. Police or people in uniforms whose job it is to collect evidence and examine it.


FBI agents and investigators do in fact show up at crime scenes dressed in suits and ties. Ever watch "The first 48" on A&E? They also tend to collect evidence ASAP in order to keep large numbers of emergency personnel or rather "first responders" from increasing the potential to inadvertently destroy or damage any evidence of a crash. If I were you 57channels, I would retract every single claim you ever made from the moment you first posted in this thread, otherwise, you might just get strung up by your puppet master srv63.

8/28/2015 12:56:49 AM  

longbobby
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (64,006)
Lufkin, TX
54, joined Aug. 2010




8/28/2015 1:50:18 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,469)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
If in the future you happen upon a crime scene, do your civic duty and help the cops pickup evidence from the crime scene.See how many lumps they will put on your head with their nightsticks and how many of them treat you like a punching bag. Guess what hotel your going to be spending your days in as well "buffoon"


Hey dumbass? Those men in suits and women in dresses? Guess what they were? Clue: THEY WERE NOT ORDINARY CITIZENS, retard.

The whole area was taped off, as in OFF LIMITS to CIVILIANS, to JOE PUBLIC. Join 57 in the BUFFOON corner.

While you are there, both of you can discuss the timeline that your fellow CT'ers have confirmed as factual to debunk the NIST time frame - which they did.

Sadly, for you SRV, you know that also debunks your hero Mr Jennings's own timeline comment of 1pm doesn't it?

Yes, it is noticed that you still refuse to answer the post.

8/28/2015 1:04:13 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,135)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


tragic


FBI agents and investigators do in fact show up at crime scenes dressed in suits and ties. Ever watch "The first 48" on A&E? They also tend to collect evidence ASAP in order to keep large numbers of emergency personnel or rather "first responders" from increasing the potential to inadvertently destroy or damage any evidence of a crash.
=========================================================
Want to bet $1000.00 that the men and women picking up tiny pieces of whatever were professionals from the FBI or POlice or whatever????

Ironically......even if they were--- everything they picked up was thrown away or burnt up or gotten rid of anyway. But....but.....but if Jim Miegs says all that stuff picked up by those people in suits and ties and dresses were serial # parts of Flight 77.....the 3 kiddies would believe every fkn word.

8/28/2015 1:10:22 PM  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,135)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

Hey dumbass? Those men in suits and women in dresses? Guess what they were? Clue: THEY WERE NOT ORDINARY CITIZENS, retard.
======================================================
Your right there about they were not ordinary citizens. They were puppets hired by the perps to get rid of the evidence in the lawn that would somehow prove a missile hit the Pentagon. Could all of these people have been huddled in a part of the Pentagon [ out of harms way ] and told to get their traitorous asses out there and steal any evidence??? Possibility...thought they were innocent Pentagon workers but odds are they were hired puppets.

8/28/2015 5:25:21 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
FBI agents and investigators do in fact show up at crime scenes dressed in suits and ties. Ever watch "The first 48" on A&E? They also tend to collect evidence ASAP in order to keep large numbers of emergency personnel or rather "first responders" from increasing the potential to inadvertently destroy or damage any evidence of a crash. If I were you 57channels, I would retract every single claim you ever made from the moment you first posted in this thread, otherwise, you might just get strung up by your puppet master srv63.


That was a failed attempt at saving one of your shill buddys parrot.His statement was ridiculous and even you know it. We are supposed to believe that anyone that wants to help is going to get the ok to start picking up evidence at what was supposed to be a crime scene before the evidence had a chance to blow away? They were not picking up evidence, they were PLANTING IT

8/28/2015 5:46:12 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Hey dumbass? Those men in suits and women in dresses? Guess what they were? Clue: THEY WERE NOT ORDINARY CITIZENS, retard.

And the proof that you have that shows they were not just office workers is????

The whole area was taped off, as in OFF LIMITS to CIVILIANS, to JOE PUBLIC. Join 57 in the BUFFOON corner.

And your proof that the suits and the dresses were not planting evidence is?????

While you are there, both of you can discuss the timeline that your fellow CT'ers have confirmed as factual to debunk the NIST time frame - which they did.

I don't have any "fellow" CT'ers.I'm an independent citizen relying 100% on my own common sense which so far shows me the government are a bunch of idiotic murderers and you shills can't possibly be so retarded to believe the crap you spew, therefore your all accomplices.

Sadly, for you SRV, you know that also debunks your hero Mr Jennings's own timeline comment of 1pm doesn't it?

Too bad molester, Barry Jennings is the ONLY one i will ever believe and will do so until you molesters PROVE that Barry Jennings timeline is wrong

Yes, it is noticed that you still refuse to answer the post.


Answer us this molester. What would Barry Jennings stand to gain by lying during his very first live interview? Wouldn't your dumb a** think that Barry knew damn well that hess's accounts wouldn't match up with his? Wouldn't you think that Barry would not do something so stupid like lying on national live television knowing his integrity would take a massive hit? I don't believe for a second that he would take such a foolish chance so therefore he is the ONLY one i believe and f**k you and ALL of your butthole buddy shills as well as your retard nist report

8/28/2015 6:32:01 PM  

longbobby
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (64,006)
Lufkin, TX
54, joined Aug. 2010


British Man Won Law Suit Against BBC for 9/11 Cover Up

BBC Foreknowledge of 9/11 Collapse of WTC Building Seven


Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged.

It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack.

Tony Rooke at the Magistrates' Court - BBC TV license

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHQPaAkIl0I

Below is the broadcast where the BBC announced the collapse of WTC 7 while it was still standing behind the reporter.

BBC Reports Collapse of WTC Building 7 Early-- TWICE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mxFRigYD3s

http://humansarefree.com/2015/03/british-man-won-law-suit-against-bbc.html

8/28/2015 7:21:47 PM  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,541)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


(this post is pending review, it will show soon, sorry for the inconvenience.)



class5 -