Select your best hookup:
Local
Gay
Asian
Latin
East Europe

skipthegames one night stands

A single time, a date hit me with this question, and I ve loved it ever given that. denver adult classifieds Finally, a date (a date?) worked out — simply because our children were worked in. My son was preparing to marry a girl who he had met locally, no dating internet site needed. sex hookup no credit card File weekly claims on UI.

mega personls

Ask all of the people today who are ones to introduce themselves to the particular person sitting straight across the table who is numbered a two. meet people in fort collins POF is absolutely among the very best dating apps on the list. Fitness and flirting all from the comfort of your workout bike? My partner of 3 years has cheated on me. bumble and bumble getaway set When Ellen Mayer, a former Curious City intern, developed an OKCupid profile in 2017, she said she was just hunting for one thing casual.

Home  Sign In  Search  Date Ideas  Join  Forums  Singles Groups  - 100% FREE Online Dating, Join Now!


8/14/2015 1:29:51 AM  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
You want me to explain what Jennings meant when he said " He said he broke a window, looked left and they were still standing, looked right and they had gone." I don't know what that means yet, guess i have a bit more research to do do figure it out. By the way, what makes you think that he was only on the north side of WTC7 the whole time?

Btw higgy, why does Barry Jennings mention in his testimony that after the stairs exploded out from under him on the 6th floor then he worked his way up to the 8th floor then he says it was "VERY,VERY,HOT". WTC7 has not caught on fire yet higgy so what the hell was going on on the 8th floor that made it so damn hot that Barry Jennings was fixing to risk killing himself to throwing the firehose out of the window so that he could climb down it to safety?
Lets hear it higgy. If you don't know the answer then ask that jew that signs your paycheck because i really would like the answer. Could the 8th floor have been one of the floors where the thermite was used to sever the main columns in WTC7 that held up the building?That's what i'm thinking


Yes, please do try to explain what he meant about looking left and still standing and looking right and gone, please do.

VERY VERY HOT? I have listened to your video's and read transcripts and guess what srv? NOT ONCE did I hear him say those words, not once. So, please provide information on your claim, thank you.

No, thermite wasn't used in any circumstances.

Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!

DateHookup.dating - 100% Free Personals


8/14/2015 2:03:39 PM Navarro, CA  

louie6332
Over 2,000 Posts (3,237)
Falkville, AL
73, joined Nov. 2011


The Pentagon has now publicly admitted that 8 trillion dollars are missing from its account. And this is in addition to the government’s black budget money from drug dealing and such. This money most likely went into the extensive system of tunnels with roads, underground military bases, underground cities, stocked with provisions (maps of which can be found on YouTube). They are preparing for the disaster caused by the flyby of Nibiru and the comet strike, and the elites hope to survive in these tunnels. These tunnels are a half mile underground, below under sea level. Such an extensive system costs money, lots of money. They are not interested in maintain the bridges and highway system and such in American, because they know that is all going to be destroyed. So they put all the money they could come up with into their system of tunnels.

They are, by the way, expecting the catastrophe of the comet strike, and it is now being revealed, will occur on or about Sept 23. The US Stock market will collapse the next day in chaos. So buy and lay away food now, enough for one to three years, for it will be impossible to do so after the disaster. And Christians are being warned to get out of Cities now, and out of coastal plains.

Russia and China are now preparing for war against the West. Russia is now, even as I write, engaged in a massive movement of troops and armaments to the border with Eastern Europe to counter the NATO movement of troops to the border regions.

Louie

8/14/2015 2:08:19 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from louie6332:
The Pentagon has now publicly admitted that 8 trillion dollars are missing from its account.


Really?

Please provide a link to confirm this audacious lie.

I am sure we won't see you for a few weeks, we never do when you are requested to back up your "posts".

8/14/2015 4:07:34 PM Navarro, CA  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,195)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

Really?

Please provide a link to confirm this audacious lie.

I am sure we won't see you for a few weeks, we never do when you are requested to back up your "posts".
=====================================================
That was funny, I got to admit. The important thing is Louie is a Patriot though

8/14/2015 4:11:56 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

Really?

Please provide a link to confirm this audacious lie.

I am sure we won't see you for a few weeks, we never do when you are requested to back up your "posts".
=====================================================
That was funny, I got to admit. The important thing is Louie is a Patriot though


he's a what? A patriot? He's like you, a full blown idiot.

Only a REAL idiot would even think of saying this

"They are, by the way, expecting the catastrophe of the comet strike, and it is now being revealed, will occur on or about Sept 23. The US Stock market will collapse the next day in chaos. So buy and lay away food now, enough for one to three years, for it will be impossible to do so after the disaster. And Christians are being warned to get out of Cities now, and out of coastal plains. "

and not expect to be taken away to a padded cell.

Again, he is like you, unable to back up your stupid claims...and like you, he ignores questions and requests for information.

Go and bow to your Master Patriot Louie the f**king nutcase you stupid man.

8/14/2015 4:13:11 PM Navarro, CA  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,195)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


Louie

They are, by the way, expecting the catastrophe of the comet strike, and it is now being revealed, will occur on or about Sept 23. The US Stock market will collapse the next day in chaos. So buy and lay away food now, enough for one to three years, for it will be impossible to do so after the disaster. And Christians are being warned to get out of Cities now, and out of coastal plains.
==================================================
Look, I know your on the side of truth and you know 9-11 was an inside job. These outrageous scare tactics I would expect from the media. Why do you always have to use them?? Like there will be no election in 2016 and such. I dont doubt the perps are building secret hideaways for the super rich. Buy food for 3 years?? Hell....I heard that stuff 35 years ago.

8/14/2015 4:21:53 PM Navarro, CA  

57channels
Over 4,000 Posts! (6,195)
Bettendorf, IA
64, joined May. 2008


higgy

Again, he is like you,
==============================
Yeah, Louie is like me and the other truth seeking Patriots who want to hold the real perps accountable for 9-11 which includes all those scholars, architects, pilots, veterans, engineers that want a REAL investigation into 9-11. Not to mention the millions worldwide that havent been brainwashed by the MSM here in Merica. You know like you and some of the other rabble


ZIEG HEIL UHN CIA/MOSSAD/FBI FALSE FLAG 9-11 AMERICA FIGHT WARS FOR ISRAEL

8/15/2015 7:07:23 PM Navarro, CA  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,794)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from 57channels:
higgy

Again, he is like you,
==============================
Yeah, Louie is like me and the other truth seeking Patriots who want to hold the real perps accountable for 9-11 which includes all those scholars, architects, pilots, veterans, engineers that want a REAL investigation into 9-11. Not to mention the millions worldwide that havent been brainwashed by the MSM here in Merica. You know like you and some of the other rabble


ZIEG HEIL UHN CIA/MOSSAD/FBI FALSE FLAG 9-11 AMERICA FIGHT WARS FOR ISRAEL


As usual, yet another pathetic post by 57channels totally devoid of the facts. So how about those scholars, architects, pilots, veterans and engineers who want a real investigation? For starters, lets check out some of the so called Architects and Engineers Richard Gage claims to have been in support of a new 911 investigation...

Credentials of the structural engineers found in AE911Truth. Of a total of 30, there were only 19 in the US, and 11 in Canada, Australia and Western Europe. Anders Björkman who used to claim to be an SE is now more accurately classified as a “Naval architect & Marine engineer”. Four seem to not really be structural engineers. Charles Pegelow is no longer listed as a structural engineer and his now expired license was for civil engineering. Apparently Rich Reed recently earned his BS, is unlicensed and left his bio (and statement) blank. Albert Arey from Chicago is listed as being “Degreed and Licensed” and “Verified” but he is in the “Other Supporters and A&E Students” group, did not provide a license number and is NOT licensed in Illinois. He claims to have a degree from Ecole Centrale Lyon, which only gives degrees in general engineering, so he might be licensed in France. Other than his education his bio gave no indication what experience, if any, he has. The only work experience William H. Russell “Architect, Structural Engineer”, of Atlanta mentioned was as an architecture professor 1973 – 2006 but failed to disclose were he taught from 1979 onward. He claims to have earned his BA in architecture and MS in architectural engineering at the University of Illinois, Urbana and to have been an “Assistant Professor” there 1973-77. He also claims to be the holder of RArch#3454(GA) and “S.Eng#4161(IL,inactive)” both issued in 1977 but a he did not turn up in the IL or GA engineers databases*, the latter of which lists inactive licensees and used 9-digit numbers and like most states neither IL nor GA issues licenses for specific types of engineers so there is no way he could have earned a “Structural Engineering Registration” in either state in 1977 or any other year. Also it is hard to believe one of the prestigious architecture programs in the US would hire an unlicensed architect as an assistant professor which is a tenure track position. Internationally? With exception of one who moved from Belgrade to London in 1989, AE911T does not have any SEs from Moslem, Communist, formerly Communist or anti-US countries.

Only 14 of them claimed to have experience with buildings and only one, Steven Merritt, cited tall buildings. Paul A. Thomas claims to have designed “concrete & steel structures to 240 ft. height” but worked mostly for “Mining & Industrial clients”.

Surprisingly only 3 mentioned NIST but only one or two seem to have read the report. The aforementioned Mr. Arey from Chicago simply said “The collapse was too neat to be ascribed to the official story and what was described in NIST report. A new investigation is warranted”, so I doubt he actually read it. His inability to spell out from an engineering perspective why he thinks the towers were CDed is yet another reason to doubt he really is an SE.

Bill Boggia and Ronald H. Brookman critiqued the NIST report in ways that suggest they actually read it (or at least articles by truthers who had). Boggia’s experience however is with offshore platforms. Brookman claims to have “over 21 years experience in structural analysis, design, evaluation and rehabilitation of buildings in northern California” but makes no mention of what types of buildings. Other than forums and truther sites the only mention of an engineer named Ronald, Ronald H. or Ronald Herman Brookman was the California Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors. However, like the others, neither Boggia nor Brookman not Merrit nor Thomas have written a technical critique of the NIST report including calculations showing (or attempting to show) that it was flawed let alone gotten anything published in an engineering journal.

Engineer License Lookup...

http://www.engineersguideusa.com/engineer_license_lookup.htm

More information can be found here...

""There is and never will be an AIA endorsement of these foolish and anti-rational theories of Richard Gage and AE911Truth. Buyer, beware.""

http://ae911truth.info/wordpress/

And a little humor to brighten your day. "Truth Movement" Autopsy...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=296832

8/15/2015 8:31:36 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from srv63:
To ALL of the deceptive, lying shills,

Since none of you CANNOT debunk Barry Jennings on his eyewitness testimony that proves WTC1 could not have caused any fires in WTC7, your bullshit nist report as well as yourselves are officially debunked and i'm not debating that subject anymore unless you come up with CONCRETE EVIDENCE to the contrary.

Now a very simple question for you shills.Did the main columns in WTC1 as well as WTC2 bend or melt when supposedly weakened by the fires in the buildings? Answer cautiously because yes, there's another debunking coming


Were still waiting on an answer

8/15/2015 8:33:31 PM Navarro, CA  
aposorichie
Over 2,000 Posts (3,776)
Berwyn, IL
59, joined Jan. 2009


It happened exactly the way the 9/11 commissions said it did.

The government is 100% truthful.

8/15/2015 8:38:42 PM Navarro, CA  

naprinciple
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (11,381)
West Plains, MO
46, joined Feb. 2014


Quote from aposorichie:
It happened exactly the way the 9/11 commissions said it did.

The government is 100% truthful.





I'm guessing you don't really believe that



The amazing part is people know they lie all the time, but yet they still trust their narrative completely

8/15/2015 9:21:51 PM Navarro, CA  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,794)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
To ALL of the deceptive, lying shills,

Since none of you CANNOT debunk Barry Jennings on his eyewitness testimony that proves WTC1 could not have caused any fires in WTC7, your bullshit nist report as well as yourselves are officially debunked and i'm not debating that subject anymore unless you come up with CONCRETE EVIDENCE to the contrary.

Now a very simple question for you shills.Did the main columns in WTC1 as well as WTC2 bend or melt when supposedly weakened by the fires in the buildings? Answer cautiously because yes, there's another debunking coming.

Were still waiting on an answer


Seeings how there were no burning vehicles until after WTC 1 had collapsed, it's unlikely either Jennings or Hess had broken a window on the 8th floor before that time, thus, Jennings testimony doesn't prove anything other than his inability to match the exact time he arrived at WTC7 with the events that followed afterwards.

It is a known fact neither WTC1 or WTC2 had collapsed due to melting of their steel columns, but rather, it was the softening of them that led to their collapse. Linky...

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112.html

8/15/2015 10:36:28 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
Seeings how there were no burning vehicles until after WTC 1 had collapsed, it's unlikely either Jennings or Hess had broken a window on the 8th floor before that time, thus, Jennings testimony doesn't prove anything other than his inability to match the exact time he arrived at WTC7 with the events that followed afterwards.

It is a known fact neither WTC1 or WTC2 had collapsed due to melting of their steel columns, but rather, it was the softening of them that led to their collapse. Linky...

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/jom/0112/eagar/eagar-0112.html


Good, so your answer is the columns bent then?

8/15/2015 11:40:29 PM Navarro, CA  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,794)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Good, so your answer is the columns bent then?


I love it how truthers always end their discussion with a ?.

8/16/2015 12:19:15 AM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
I love it how truthers always end their discussion with a ?.


Have you researched on how the main center columns of each tower were connected?

8/16/2015 12:21:58 AM Navarro, CA  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,794)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Have you researched on how the main center columns of each tower were connected?


Yes, but apparently you haven't.

8/16/2015 12:31:00 AM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Yes, please do try to explain what he meant about looking left and still standing and looking right and gone, please do.

VERY VERY HOT? I have listened to your video's and read transcripts and guess what srv? NOT ONCE did I hear him say those words, not once. So, please provide information on your claim, thank you.

No, thermite wasn't used in any circumstances.


Here's a present for you higgy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmeY2vJ6ZoA

Start video at 4:30 where Mr Barry Jennings is describing his first encounters with the 8th floor of WTC7 after he experienced the explosion beneath his feet on the 6th floor. Now tell us WHY it was very,very hot on the eighth floor of WTC7, so hot that Jennings had to knock out a window with a fire extinguisher and was fixing to throw that floors firehose out thru the window so that he and mr hess could escape the heat. Could the "very,very hot" temperature inside the 8th floor have been one of the floors that the thermite was ignited to melt the main columns of that building as to weaken it so that it could come down when the demolition team wanted it to?

8/16/2015 12:54:30 AM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
Here's a present for you higgy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmeY2vJ6ZoA

Start video at 4:30 where Mr Barry Jennings is describing his first encounters with the 8th floor of WTC7 after he experienced the explosion beneath his feet on the 6th floor. Now tell us WHY it was very,very hot on the eighth floor of WTC7, so hot that Jennings had to knock out a window with a fire extinguisher and was fixing to throw that floors firehose out thru the window so that he and mr hess could escape the heat. Could the "very,very hot" temperature inside the 8th floor have been one of the floors that the thermite was ignited to melt the main columns of that building as to weaken it so that it could come down when the demolition team wanted it to?


Yes, I stand corrected, he did say that.

He also said he was trapped in there for several hours.

Tell one lie, brings the rest into question doesn't it?

Thermite, you would need circa 100lbs of thermite to even begin to melt ONE column.

8/16/2015 12:56:21 AM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
Were still waiting on an answer


Just like we are waiting for your time frame on Mr Jennings, waiting for you to debunk the official time-line with your own.

How did he see cars on fire before the collapse of the Towers srv? Tragic asked you this too.

8/16/2015 9:50:33 AM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Yes, I stand corrected, he did say that.

He also said he was trapped in there for several hours.

Tell one lie, brings the rest into question doesn't it?

Thermite, you would need circa 100lbs of thermite to even begin to melt ONE column.


Now it's time to use logic. Is there any reason for Barry Jennings to be stuck on only the 8th floor for them hours that he was trapped inside WTC7? Did he in any interview state that he was trapped ONLY on the 8th floor all that time? The answer is no. Why would he focus his efforts of escaping mainly on the 8th floor, could it be that it was closest to the ground in order for the firehose he had in the building to be able to reach the ground in order to escape the building? I'm sure after brief times on the 8th floor the heat would get too unbearable therefore forcing him and mr hess back up to the higher floors. Does this LOGIC make sense to you? So you see, Barry Jennings DID NOT lie.

As far as the thermite, no doubt there were thousands of pounds of it to take all three buildings down.Do you think the jew that leased the WTC complex cared how much thermite was needed or the cost when he stood to make BILLIONS off of the buildings collapse?

8/16/2015 10:00:04 AM Navarro, CA  

tragicparrot
Over 1,000 Posts (1,794)
Painesville, OH
57, joined Mar. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Now it's time to use logic. Is there any reason for Barry Jennings to be stuck on only the 8th floor for them hours that he was trapped inside WTC7? Did he in any interview state that he was trapped ONLY on the 8th floor all that time? The answer is no. Why would he focus his efforts of escaping mainly on the 8th floor, could it be that it was closest to the ground in order for the firehose he had in the building to be able to reach the ground in order to escape the building? I'm sure after brief times on the 8th floor the heat would get too unbearable therefore forcing him and mr hess back up to the higher floors. Does this LOGIC make sense to you? So you see, Barry Jennings DID NOT lie.

As far as the thermite, no doubt there were thousands of pounds of it to take all three buildings down.Do you think the jew that leased the WTC complex cared how much thermite was needed or the cost when he stood to make BILLIONS off of the buildings collapse?


What a ignorant post. Had thousands of pounds of thermite been utilized to bring down either structures the evidence would have been overwhelming.

Anymore ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

8/16/2015 10:16:04 AM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Just like we are waiting for your time frame on Mr Jennings, waiting for you to debunk the official time-line with your own.

How did he see cars on fire before the collapse of the Towers srv? Tragic asked you this too.


I have already gave my timeline for Barry Jennings that morning of 9/11 and there is no doubt in my mind that my timeline is one hell of allot closer on point than your bullshit nist report.Keep in mind, the more you shills try moving up the timeline to coincide with the collapse of WTC1, the more voided area of a timeline between the time that Barry Jennings first got the phone call about the first tower being hit while he was ALREADY on his way to WTC7 and the time he finally arrives to WTC7.For your timeline to work, Barry Jennings would have to live OVER 1 1/2 hours drive away from WTC7 which he doesn't. Have you shills found out yet how many miles away he lived from WTC7 as well as how long that drive would take with NO TRAFFIC as was the case that day? Sorry but your nist timeline is BOGUS BULLSHIT therefore the rest of that bullshit nist report LOSES ALL CREDIBILITY

The cars that Barry Jennings saw on fire before the towers collapsed could only have been caused by the EXPLOSIONS that were already going on in the lobby and sub basement floors of each tower WTC 1 and WTC2.Remember the video of the firefighters in the lobby saying that when they arrived, the lobby windows had all been blown out and tiles on the walls blown off? No way in hell the explosions of impact 80 floors up is going to make it down to the lobby, even if it could travel thru some of the elevator shafts because the vast majority of the force from the explosion from plane impact would be released thru the windows of each floor that was impacted by the plane. So tell us shills, what blew up the lobby in each tower?

8/16/2015 10:25:13 AM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from tragicparrot:
What a ignorant post. Had thousands of pounds of thermite been utilized to bring down either structures the evidence would have been overwhelming.

Anymore ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????


I'm not an authority on thermite so for now i cannot tell you how many pounds of thermite would have been used to bring down all three buildings into their own footprints. Thermite WAS found in the dust debris by outside scientists so you shills cannot deny it.You parrot, seem to be an expert on thermite by questioning my statement so you tell me, how many pounds of thermite did your puppet master use?

8/16/2015 5:07:51 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
I'm not an authority on thermite


Obviously as it isn't an explosive for a start.

so for now i cannot tell you how many pounds of thermite would have been used to bring down all three buildings into their own footprints.


I can. Several tons.

Thermite WAS found in the dust debris by outside scientists so you shills cannot deny it.


No it wasn't discovered in the WTC dust as I demonstrated some time ago. That study was a fake.



8/16/2015 5:09:25 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from louie6332:
The Pentagon has now publicly admitted that 8 trillion dollars are missing from its account.


That's a lie Louie. You should stop that.

8/16/2015 6:21:36 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
The cars that Barry Jennings saw on fire before the towers collapsed could only have been caused by the EXPLOSIONS that were already going on in the lobby and sub basement floors of each tower WTC 1 and WTC2.


On Barclay St.?



Clearly, you're just making shit up as you go along.






[Edited 8/16/2015 6:23:07 PM ]

8/16/2015 7:16:52 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Thermite has been used previously to demolish the Skyride Tower (1936).



Note the large quantities compacted around the supports. This worked well in taking down this tower, but it is impractical for a complex such as the WTC owing to its design.

What 9/11 truth fails to observe or acknowledge at every point, is that this thermite was able to survive fires for over an hour. No matter how 9/11 truth dresses it up, they evade the issue, and this is clearly impossible. Thermite is incapable of surviving fires and yet it needed to be deployed at the impact sites to initiate the collapse sequence. 9/11 truth have failed to think this through.

Moreover, the quantities required to demolish the WTC are huge and would not have been deployed without staff noticing. This is clearly illogical and ridiculous. In addition, the flash would have been seen from space and no such flash is recorded.

Thermite is merely the fantasy of the simple-minded. No thermite in the dust, no thermite in the wreckage, no Munroe effect on the steel, no Barotrauma for Jennings and Hess.

No evidence for explosives exists other than the opinion of the feeble-minded who lack skills in logic.



8/16/2015 7:36:41 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from srv63:
I'm not an authority on thermite


Obviously as it isn't an explosive for a start.
If your suggesting that thermite doesn't have any explosive characteristics then you are not familiar with it either.

so for now i cannot tell you how many pounds of thermite would have been used to bring down all three buildings into their own footprints.


I can. Several tons.
Apparently your shill buddy parrot will disagree and think your an idiot

Thermite WAS found in the dust debris by outside scientists so you shills cannot deny it.


No it wasn't discovered in the WTC dust as I demonstrated some time ago. That study was a fake.

I don't remember seeing you proving the study was fake

8/16/2015 7:40:43 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from class5:
On Barclay St.?



Clearly, you're just making shit up as you go along.




Why are you saying barclay street? Are you suggesting that Jennings was trapped in one room?

8/16/2015 7:53:53 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Why are you saying barclay street? Are you suggesting that Jennings was trapped in one room?



Because it was the Barclay St window that Jennings was looking out of when he commented on seeing the burning cars and buses.



8/16/2015 8:06:03 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
If your suggesting that thermite doesn't have any explosive characteristics then you are not familiar with it either.


It needs to be confined in large amounts to have 'explosive properties'-far beyond what was practical for 9/11. Note how it was deployed on the Skyride tower-it wasn't used as an explosive. Thermite is not an explosive in itself.

Apparently your shill buddy parrot will disagree and think your an idiot


No, he's not a shill and you've misinterpreted his post. Many tons would be required to demolish the WTC, and the flash would have been seen from space. Furthermore, it cannot survive fires.

Thermite WAS found in the dust debris by outside scientists so you shills cannot deny it.


No, that has been disproved and I've already supplied overwhelming evidence on that score. That meme is dead.

I don't remember seeing you proving the study was fake


Hardly surprising. You're more interested in being a douche than actually paying attention to the evidence being posted. Chris Mohr debated Richard Gage on numerous occasions and produced a 23 video series than refutes all the claims of Jones, Harritt and Farer. These pseudo-scientists used samples of unknown origin and used test that gave them the result they wanted. Chris Mohr raised funds for further testing done independently by MVA using samples of known provenance and showed that the 'thermite residue' claimed by Jones and Harritt etc. was nothing more than rust proofing.

I've posted the video and TragicParrot has posted links to the entire series IIRC.




So, since you think you're an expert, how do you account for the thermite charges surviving the temperatures of the fires at the impact points? After all, that was where they needed to be triggered in order to produce the collapse sequence we all know.



8/16/2015 10:23:12 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from class5:
Because it was the Barclay St window that Jennings was looking out of when he commented on seeing the burning cars and buses.



What video shows Jennings saying Barclay street? I'm sure Jennings was looking out of windows on all four sides of the building. You do need to ease up on the deception

8/16/2015 10:40:42 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
What video shows Jennings saying Barclay street? I'm sure Jennings was looking out of windows on all four sides of the building. You do need to ease up on the deception


*SIGH* I thought you knew the subject. In his account he is talking about the Barclay St. window when he sees the burning buses and cars. Read the transcripts already posted.



8/16/2015 11:00:14 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


The Barclay St window is in the red square.




8/16/2015 11:05:54 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from class5:
Hardly surprising. You're more interested in being a douche than actually paying attention to the evidence being posted. Chris Mohr debated Richard Gage on numerous occasions and produced a 23 video series than refutes all the claims of Jones, Harritt and Farer. These pseudo-scientists used samples of unknown origin and used test that gave them the result they wanted. Chris Mohr raised funds for further testing done independently by MVA using samples of known provenance and showed that the 'thermite residue' claimed by Jones and Harritt etc. was nothing more than rust proofing.

I've posted the video and TragicParrot has posted links to the entire series IIRC.




So, since you think you're an expert, how do you account for the thermite charges surviving the temperatures of the fires at the impact points? After all, that was where they needed to be triggered in order to produce the collapse sequence we all know.



Just a thought but:

What if the thermite didn't have to survive the fires. Why couldn't the plane actually be the "fuse" to ignite the prepared charges of thermite that were already installed INSIDE of the main columns of each tower? The thicker the steel of each column, the more thermite used to turn the steel to liquid.

8/16/2015 11:10:15 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
Just a thought but:

What if the thermite didn't have to survive the fires. Why couldn't the plane actually be the "fuse" to ignite the prepared charges of thermite that were already installed INSIDE of the main columns of each tower? The thicker the steel of each column, the more thermite used to turn the steel to liquid.


That requires the detonation to be at the time of impact and not that of the collapse. That contradicts the usual truther hypothesis of the detonation being at the time, and point of collapse.

That hypothesis has many logistical problems as well, like access to the core columns requiring refacing the core in drywall to cover the operation and no-one has reported such undertakings.

8/16/2015 11:24:39 PM Navarro, CA  

class5
Over 2,000 Posts (2,615)
Queensland
Australia
52, joined Jan. 2014


Quote from srv63:
The thicker the steel of each column, the more thermite used to turn the steel to liquid.


The steel didn't turn to liquid, it merely lost its structural integrity.







[Edited 8/16/2015 11:25:12 PM ]

8/16/2015 11:51:52 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from class5:
That requires the detonation to be at the time of impact and not that of the collapse. That contradicts the usual truther hypothesis of the detonation being at the time, and point of collapse.

That hypothesis has many logistical problems as well, like access to the core columns requiring refacing the core in drywall to cover the operation and no-one has reported such undertakings.


There were clearly quite a few detonations right after the drones hit the towers and clearly many many more detonations as the towers were falling.

It's funny that like yourself, i can find many many pics online of I-beams and other scrap matal that used to be the twin towers but i find it very odd that there are very few pictures of the main columns that once were the main supports for the twin towers and of them very few pics of the main columns, not one photo showing an inside view of the column. I wonder why

8/17/2015 2:08:21 AM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
What video shows Jennings saying Barclay street? I'm sure Jennings was looking out of windows on all four sides of the building. You do need to ease up on the deception


We have his word on the video you keep posting that he was looking out of the window and saw cars and buses on fire ..............the window was on the north side of the WTC7 and that faces Barclay Street.

So how did these buses and cars catch fire if not from the collapse of the Towers?


Mmmmmm, interesting.

8/17/2015 2:31:08 AM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
Now it's time to use logic. Is there any reason for Barry Jennings to be stuck on only the 8th floor for them hours that he was trapped inside WTC7? Did he in any interview state that he was trapped ONLY on the 8th floor all that time? The answer is no. Why would he focus his efforts of escaping mainly on the 8th floor, could it be that it was closest to the ground in order for the firehose he had in the building to be able to reach the ground in order to escape the building? I'm sure after brief times on the 8th floor the heat would get too unbearable therefore forcing him and mr hess back up to the higher floors. Does this LOGIC make sense to you? So you see, Barry Jennings DID NOT lie.


Your logic is fantastic!

Please tell me on your video where Jennings ever said that he left the 8th floor for a higher floor.

Why did Hess say that there were in there for 90 minutes and Jennings state several hours?

Are you even aware of the Hess interview?

No, Jennings LIED, he was not in there for several hours as he stated. His whole tale is a mere embellishment of facts and a great deal of fiction.

You say you have proven his timeline? Liar, you have not even offered a time line, how could you have done? You would have seen that he wasn't trapped in there for hours had you done so.

Jennings admits the OEM was empty by the time they got there, you need to concentrate on THAT time frame. If you want to prove anyone wrong, you really need to try to ascertain the actual evacuation of that room on Floor 23. Couple that with the time that they set up the triage on the ground floor and you will have us all debunked...or when you study that, maybe you will understand that Jennings lied....with that in mind, we know you won't try to find another time frame other than the one on record....you don't want him debunked as it ruins your complete nonsense of explosives used.

We all know that when we debunk YOU, we research and we come up with facts, yours is mere fiction and theories.

8/17/2015 1:18:52 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
We have his word on the video you keep posting that he was looking out of the window and saw cars and buses on fire ..............the window was on the north side of the WTC7 and that faces Barclay Street.

So how did these buses and cars catch fire if not from the collapse of the Towers?


Mmmmmm, interesting.


To suggest that the simple inertia of the twin towers collapsing would generate enough heat to catch vehicles on fire, is preposterous and i would have to see proof of it being possible because it does not make a damn bit of sense. The ONLY way i see that as possible, is if us Truthers are right that the main columns of each tower were melted to a liquid state by the use of THERMITE.

8/17/2015 1:22:40 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Your logic is fantastic!

Please tell me on your video where Jennings ever said that he left the 8th floor for a higher floor.

Why did Hess say that there were in there for 90 minutes and Jennings state several hours?

Are you even aware of the Hess interview?

No, Jennings LIED, he was not in there for several hours as he stated. His whole tale is a mere embellishment of facts and a great deal of fiction.

You say you have proven his timeline? Liar, you have not even offered a time line, how could you have done? You would have seen that he wasn't trapped in there for hours had you done so.

Jennings admits the OEM was empty by the time they got there, you need to concentrate on THAT time frame. If you want to prove anyone wrong, you really need to try to ascertain the actual evacuation of that room on Floor 23. Couple that with the time that they set up the triage on the ground floor and you will have us all debunked...or when you study that, maybe you will understand that Jennings lied....with that in mind, we know you won't try to find another time frame other than the one on record....you don't want him debunked as it ruins your complete nonsense of explosives used.

We all know that when we debunk YOU, we research and we come up with facts, yours is mere fiction and theories.


VERY VERY SIMPLE question for even you higgy.What time do YOU think Barry Jennings arrived at WTC7 and what time did he finally leave the building?

8/17/2015 1:31:33 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


To the senile, easily confused and blind higgy:

Quote from srv63:
One key thing that you fail/refuse to accept, is that Barry Jennings was already on his way to work when getting the call that WTC1 was just hit by a cessna aircraft.That call was made to him between 8:50am and 8:55am. Barry Jennings already testified that traffic that morning was "excellent", meaning no delays. Anyone with common sense would know that "the call" would make any normal person even speed up a bit to get to work to man the OEM office. Since we don't know whether or not Barry was closest to home or closest to work at the time of the call, we are going to settle for the midpoint unless you shills want to dispute that. That midpoint makes Barry Jennings arriving at WTC7 by NO LATER than 9:20AM.

Arrives at WTC7 at 9:20AM and sees lots of cops in lobby

Arrives at 23rd floor at 9:25AM but can't get in

Goes back down to lobby where cops accompany him in freight elevator back to 23rd floor and this time he gets into OEM.Time now is 9:35AM

Barry sees evidence of people recently there but him and mr hess can't find anyone so they start making phone calls and someone tells them to get out of the building immediately.Time now is 9:45AM

Barry Jennings and hess quickly head for the stairs and are skipping stairs as they are running and get down to the 6th floor then EXPLOSION wipes out the stairwell out from underneath Barry Jennings feet leaving him dangling and holding onto the guardrail.Time now 9:48AM



Now call me a liar and say that i NEVER furnished my timeline for Barry Jennings.F**k off now

8/17/2015 1:32:07 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
To suggest that the simple inertia of the twin towers collapsing would generate enough heat to catch vehicles on fire, is preposterous and i would have to see proof of it being possible because it does not make a damn bit of sense. The ONLY way i see that as possible, is if us Truthers are right that the main columns of each tower were melted to a liquid state by the use of THERMITE.


But you never answered the direct question did you?

I will post it again for you to ponder and answer:

"So how did these buses and cars catch fire if not from the collapse of the Towers?"

8/17/2015 1:41:01 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
To the senile, easily confused and blind higgy:

Quote from srv63:
One key thing that you fail/refuse to accept, is that Barry Jennings was already on his way to work when getting the call that WTC1 was just hit by a cessna aircraft.That call was made to him between 8:50am and 8:55am. Barry Jennings already testified that traffic that morning was "excellent", meaning no delays. Anyone with common sense would know that "the call" would make any normal person even speed up a bit to get to work to man the OEM office. Since we don't know whether or not Barry was closest to home or closest to work at the time of the call, we are going to settle for the midpoint unless you shills want to dispute that. That midpoint makes Barry Jennings arriving at WTC7 by NO LATER than 9:20AM.

Arrives at WTC7 at 9:20AM and sees lots of cops in lobby

Arrives at 23rd floor at 9:25AM but can't get in

Goes back down to lobby where cops accompany him in freight elevator back to 23rd floor and this time he gets into OEM.Time now is 9:35AM

Barry sees evidence of people recently there but him and mr hess can't find anyone so they start making phone calls and someone tells them to get out of the building immediately.Time now is 9:45AM

Barry Jennings and hess quickly head for the stairs and are skipping stairs as they are running and get down to the 6th floor then EXPLOSION wipes out the stairwell out from underneath Barry Jennings feet leaving him dangling and holding onto the guardrail.Time now 9:48AM



Now call me a liar and say that i NEVER furnished my timeline for Barry Jennings.F**k off now


YOUR timeline is NOT proof! but yes, I stand corrected and you did provide a time line of your own making and not one furnished by Jennings.

YOUR timeline is in question, naturally.

8/17/2015 1:48:18 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
VERY VERY SIMPLE question for even you higgy.What time do YOU think Barry Jennings arrived at WTC7 and what time did he finally leave the building?


I do enjoy the simple things in life, that is possibly why I like you, you are sthe simplest of them all.

Frank Ucciardo: That’s right, I’m standing here just off Broadway by City Hall with Mike Hess who is the City Corporation Counsel. Mr. Hess, you were trapped in, I believe, 7 World Trade Center. Go ahead, sir.

Michael Hess: Yes, I was. I was up in the Emergency Management Center on the 23rd floor. And when all the power went out in the building, another gentleman and I walked down to the eighth floor where there was an explosion, and left us trapped on the eighth floor with smoke, thick smoke all around us for about an hour and a half. But the New York Fire Department, terrific as they are, just came and got us out.

As David Ray Griffin points out in his August 2009 revision began at 11:57, so my citation of the NIST 12:10-12:15 rescue time for Hess and Barry Jennings couldn’t be right. So, mea culpa!

However, the time is not that far off, and the interview certainly isn’t the death blow to the official timeline it’s imagined to be. The interview is “off Broadway by City Hall.” The general area is three blocks or so from Building 7. And Hess says that the fire department “just came and got us out.” His inflection is clear. He’s talking about having been rescued not long before the interview. An hour and a half before noon is about 10:30, which is consistent with the “explosion” being the WTC 1 debris hitting the building.


The interview start at 11:57 and guess what srv? IT WAS LIVE, A LIVE INTERVIEW. So he was just being interviewed just after having been trapped for "about 1 1/2 hours", constant with the collpase of the Towers at the time he and Jennings reached the 8th floor.

8/17/2015 1:49:18 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Yes, I stand corrected, he did say that.

He also said he was trapped in there for several hours.

Tell one lie, brings the rest into question doesn't it?

Thermite, you would need circa 100lbs of thermite to even begin to melt ONE column.


Just so you know higgy, you are officially considered an IDIOT by your fellow shill parrot because he thinks the idea of using 2 or 3 thousand pounds of thermite to weaken the buildings is ridiculous and stupid. According to your comment above,and i quote "Thermite, you would need circa 100lbs of thermite to even begin to melt ONE column." I agree with your statement but if we are right, that would mean 100 pounds of thermite required per total of 94 main columns that supported both twin towers. That would be a total of 9,400 pounds of thermite. Officially in the eyes of your fellow shill parrot, your now an idiot like us truthers. I guess EVEN YOU SHILLS CAN'T ALWAYS AGREE EITHER HUH?

.

8/17/2015 1:57:36 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
Just so you know higgy, you are officially considered an IDIOT by your fellow shill parrot because he thinks the idea of using 2 or 3 thousand pounds of thermite to weaken the buildings is ridiculous and stupid. According to your comment above,and i quote "Thermite, you would need circa 100lbs of thermite to even begin to melt ONE column." I agree with your statement but if we are right, that would mean 100 pounds of thermite required per total of 94 main columns that supported both twin towers. That would be a total of 9,400 pounds of thermite. Officially in the eyes of your fellow shill parrot, your now an idiot like us truthers. I guess EVEN YOU SHILLS CAN'T ALWAYS AGREE EITHER HUH?

.


I think you need to understand my comment, I was ridiculing you by announcing that just to melt one column you'd need 100lbs ergo you would need a vast amount of thermite to bring the towers down AND THAT IS RIDICULOUS to even think thermite would be used DUE TO THE VAST QUANTITIES REQUIRED.

I agree with whoever said using 2 or 3 thousand pound is ridiculous and for your information, they didn't need to 'thermite each column'. Heat from the fires weakened the structures and they bent under the weight and ergo, the collapse.

No, trust me srv, we all think that any amount of thermite you claim was used is ridiculous.

8/17/2015 1:59:30 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
I do enjoy the simple things in life, that is possibly why I like you, you are sthe simplest of them all.

Frank Ucciardo: That’s right, I’m standing here just off Broadway by City Hall with Mike Hess who is the City Corporation Counsel. Mr. Hess, you were trapped in, I believe, 7 World Trade Center. Go ahead, sir.

Michael Hess: Yes, I was. I was up in the Emergency Management Center on the 23rd floor. And when all the power went out in the building, another gentleman and I walked down to the eighth floor where there was an explosion, and left us trapped on the eighth floor with smoke, thick smoke all around us for about an hour and a half. But the New York Fire Department, terrific as they are, just came and got us out.

As David Ray Griffin points out in his August 2009 revision began at 11:57, so my citation of the NIST 12:10-12:15 rescue time for Hess and Barry Jennings couldn’t be right. So, mea culpa!

However, the time is not that far off, and the interview certainly isn’t the death blow to the official timeline it’s imagined to be. The interview is “off Broadway by City Hall.” The general area is three blocks or so from Building 7. And Hess says that the fire department “just came and got us out.” His inflection is clear. He’s talking about having been rescued not long before the interview. An hour and a half before noon is about 10:30, which is consistent with the “explosion” being the WTC 1 debris hitting the building.


The interview start at 11:57 and guess what srv? IT WAS LIVE, A LIVE INTERVIEW. So he was just being interviewed just after having been trapped for "about 1 1/2 hours", constant with the collpase of the Towers at the time he and Jennings reached the 8th floor.


AGAIN, i will ask you a SIMPLE SIMPLE question higgy,

Quote from srv63:
VERY VERY SIMPLE question for even you higgy.What time do YOU think Barry Jennings arrived at WTC7 and what time did he finally leave the building?

Will you finally answer the question?

8/17/2015 2:15:20 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
I think you need to understand my comment, I was ridiculing you by announcing that just to melt one column you'd need 100lbs ergo you would need a vast amount of thermite to bring the towers down AND THAT IS RIDICULOUS to even think thermite would be used DUE TO THE VAST QUANTITIES REQUIRED.

I agree with whoever said using 2 or 3 thousand pound is ridiculous and for your information, they didn't need to 'thermite each column'. Heat from the fires weakened the structures and they bent under the weight and ergo, the collapse.

No, trust me srv, we all think that any amount of thermite you claim was used is ridiculous.


So now your claiming that you agree with"I agree with whoever said", now that you know it was one of your fellow shills? Yeah right

As far as your comment "they didn't need to 'thermite each column'. Heat from the fires weakened the structures and they bent under the weight and ergo, the collapse." Actually your wrong. If they didn't thermite every single main column in each tower and thermited every other main column, there's no way the towers would have came down straight like they did, the un-thermited main columns were so heavy duty in strength because of their massive size and thickness of steel, that they would have forced the section of building above to fall to one side or the other.Common sense goes a LONG way



[Edited 8/17/2015 2:16:46 PM ]

8/17/2015 2:16:12 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
AGAIN, i will ask you a SIMPLE SIMPLE question higgy,

Quote from srv63:
VERY VERY SIMPLE question for even you higgy.What time do YOU think Barry Jennings arrived at WTC7 and what time did he finally leave the building?

Will you finally answer the question?


Well, seeing that he and Hess were together, one would anticiapte that they were rescued together and according to the time of the live tv recording at 11:57, it would be have been just before that and, according to Hess, had been TRAPPED in there for 1 1/2hours. Now the word TRAPPED is the key word srv, prior to the 'explosion' they were NOT TRAPPED, they were hopping, skipping their merry way down the stairs (according to you with Jennings saying that), they were not TRAPPED, they were free and easy and enjoying being able to see and breathe...UNTIL B A N G the 'explosion' and the collapse if the sixth floor.

Suddenly, black smoke, unable to see and unable to go anywhere, they WERE TRAPPED.

90 minutes later (about), Hess was talking to a reporter on LIVE TV.

AQs to what time Jennings and Hess arrived at the WTC? After the evacuation of the OEM and the WTC which would have been around 9.45 as an educated guess. Don't forget srv, WTC 7 was EMPTY, save the triage being establish to cater for the evacuation of North and South Towers.

With that point in mind, they arrived AFTER the building was evacuated and with the proof that Hess was on LIVE tv at 11:57, it is safe to assume that they had both been rescued a few minutes before that time.

I hope that answers your question Srv. They were in the building around 9.45 to around 11.55. TRAPPED at around 10.30 - consistent with the collapse of the Tower.

They were NOT in there for SEVERAL hours as claimed by Jennings.

8/17/2015 2:21:36 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
So now your claiming that you agree with"I agree with whoever said", now that you know it was one of your fellow shills? Yeah right

As far as your comment "they didn't need to 'thermite each column'. Heat from the fires weakened the structures and they bent under the weight and ergo, the collapse." Actually your wrong. If they didn't thermite every single main column in each tower and thermited every other main column, there's no way the towers would have came down strait like they did, the unthermited main colums were so heavy duty in strength because of their massive size and thickness of steel, that they would have forced the section of building above to fall to one side or the other.Common sense goes a LONG way


No, the point I was making was the amount that was needed for just ONE column, 100lbs.

Can't you see how stupid you are? To thermite EVERY column, they would need an incredible amount of thermite to be laid around each column, that is why we say it is stupid and ridiculous, to even think that could bring in tonnes of thermite, place it around the base of each column and then ignite it is plain stupid to even think about.


All of us who are against you are in agreement that NO thermite was used. END of story.

8/17/2015 11:29:44 PM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
No, the point I was making was the amount that was needed for just ONE column, 100lbs.

Can't you see how stupid you are? To thermite EVERY column, they would need an incredible amount of thermite to be laid around each column, that is why we say it is stupid and ridiculous, to even think that could bring in tonnes of thermite, place it around the base of each column and then ignite it is plain stupid to even think about.


All of us who are against you are in agreement that NO thermite was used. END of story.


It will be the end of the story ONLY when WE say so. So far, all you spineless shills have done is ridiculed the thermite explanation as the only plausible explanation on how such massive columns of steel could just VANISH.

By the way, i have done a fair bit of research on thermite to where i know the difference between it and other high temperature steel cutting compounds. I realise now that i have been using the wrong word for the compound that was used to cut thru the massive main columns that supported all three skyscrapers and that compound is military grade "THERMATE"

Another video for you government paid wh*res to watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWiusdy1miI

.

8/18/2015 1:11:53 AM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
It will be the end of the story ONLY when WE say so. So far, all you spineless shills have done is ridiculed the thermite explanation as the only plausible explanation on how such massive columns of steel could just VANISH.

By the way, i have done a fair bit of research on thermite to where i know the difference between it and other high temperature steel cutting compounds. I realise now that i have been using the wrong word for the compound that was used to cut thru the massive main columns that supported all three skyscrapers and that compound is military grade "THERMATE"

Another video for you government paid wh*res to watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWiusdy1miI

.


Wrong word again? Like explosion and explosives? Or is it just that your thermite theory was so ridiculous and easily debunked, you did some research and found out just how many tonnes would be needed?

Let's debunk you again :



As a former "conspiracy theorist", & pro-scientific thinker, I can't help but notice the major errors in the theories on 9/11. When it comes to the inside job theories, I just can't take it as truth any longer. In which I feel the only credible argument the conspiracy theorists held was of a mere misunderstanding - the finding of Thermate chemical signatures in the Twin Towers.

Steven Jones has done plenty of speeches about this in which he points out the chemical elements found within the debris. These elements pointed out are as such: iron, sulfur, aluminum, potassium, manganese, fluorine, & titanium.

Yes, most of these elements can be found in thermate. Jones had this one right. So what's the problem here? Well, like any proper scientist who would conduct studies on these elements, they'd first try & find any natural sources in which these elements could come from. And guess what? They all check out for other natural sources:

Sulfur: The third most common ingredient in the WTC construction was gypsum-based drywall, which is 18.62% sulfur.
Iron: Used in paint & electronic devices.
Potassium: Used in concrete.
Manganese: Used in the structural steel, paint, batteries, & ceramics.
Fluorine: Used in Freon. 200,000 pounds of Freon cooled the WTC complex. This was the largest air-conditioning system in the country.
Titanium: Used in paper & paint & made up 2% of each of the 767's. WTC7 was also clad in polished steel & titanium.

I find the idea of Jones claiming these elements were uncommon & only found within thermate quite disturbing, & at the least illogical.


http://www.thescienceforum.com/pseudoscience/21364-9-11-conspiracy-theory-thermate-debunked.html

8/18/2015 1:13:15 AM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Well, seeing that he and Hess were together, one would anticipate that they were rescued together and according to the time of the live tv recording at 11:57, it would be have been just before that and, according to Hess, had been TRAPPED in there for 1 1/2 hours. Now the word TRAPPED is the key word srv, prior to the 'explosion' they were NOT TRAPPED, they were hopping, skipping their merry way down the stairs (according to you with Jennings saying that), they were not TRAPPED, they were free and easy and enjoying being able to see and breathe...UNTIL B A N G the 'explosion' and the collapse if the sixth floor.

Suddenly, black smoke, unable to see and unable to go anywhere, they WERE TRAPPED.

90 minutes later (about), Hess was talking to a reporter on LIVE TV.

AQs to what time Jennings and Hess arrived at the WTC? After the evacuation of the OEM and the WTC which would have been around 9.45 as an educated guess. Don't forget srv, WTC 7 was EMPTY, save the triage being establish to cater for the evacuation of North and South Towers.

With that point in mind, they arrived AFTER the building was evacuated and with the proof that Hess was on LIVE tv at 11:57, it is safe to assume that they had both been rescued a few minutes before that time.

I hope that answers your question Srv. They were in the building around 9.45 to around 11.55. TRAPPED at around 10.30 - consistent with the collapse of the Tower.

They were NOT in there for SEVERAL hours as claimed by Jennings.


No comments srv?

Does this time frame seem far more logical (and truthful) than yours?

8/18/2015 1:25:08 AM Navarro, CA  

pastmybedtime
Huntingdon, TN
39, joined Apr. 2015


Have we started on the Chinese explosion conspiracy yet?

did I miss it?

the one where we launched the "Gods beam" down from space on the military depot due to the Chinese devaluing their currency?

8/18/2015 7:29:21 AM Navarro, CA  

naprinciple
Over 10,000 Posts!!! (11,381)
West Plains, MO
46, joined Feb. 2014


Quote from pastmybedtime:
Have we started on the Chinese explosion conspiracy yet?

did I miss it?

the one where we launched the "Gods beam" down from space on the military depot due to the Chinese devaluing their currency?




Long answer:

Strawman, ad hominem and red herring fallacies


Short answer:

Longbobby has

8/18/2015 10:01:40 AM Navarro, CA  

srv63
Over 1,000 Posts (1,658)
Baytown, TX
52, joined Jul. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
Wrong word again? Like explosion and explosives? Or is it just that your thermite theory was so ridiculous and easily debunked, you did some research and found out just how many tonnes would be needed?

Let's debunk you again :



As a former "conspiracy theorist", & pro-scientific thinker, I can't help but notice the major errors in the theories on 9/11. When it comes to the inside job theories, I just can't take it as truth any longer. In which I feel the only credible argument the conspiracy theorists held was of a mere misunderstanding - the finding of Thermate chemical signatures in the Twin Towers.

Steven Jones has done plenty of speeches about this in which he points out the chemical elements found within the debris. These elements pointed out are as such: iron, sulfur, aluminum, potassium, manganese, fluorine, & titanium.

Yes, most of these elements can be found in thermate. Jones had this one right. So what's the problem here? Well, like any proper scientist who would conduct studies on these elements, they'd first try & find any natural sources in which these elements could come from. And guess what? They all check out for other natural sources:

Sulfur: The third most common ingredient in the WTC construction was gypsum-based drywall, which is 18.62% sulfur.
Iron: Used in paint & electronic devices.
Potassium: Used in concrete.
Manganese: Used in the structural steel, paint, batteries, & ceramics.
Fluorine: Used in Freon. 200,000 pounds of Freon cooled the WTC complex. This was the largest air-conditioning system in the country.
Titanium: Used in paper & paint & made up 2% of each of the 767's. WTC7 was also clad in polished steel & titanium.

I find the idea of Jones claiming these elements were uncommon & only found within thermate quite disturbing, & at the least illogical.


http://www.thescienceforum.com/pseudoscience/21364-9-11-conspiracy-theory-thermate-debunked.html
.

One ingredient you failed to mention shill which was also found in the dust. Care to tell us how barium was found as well?

8/18/2015 1:37:59 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from higgy51:
No comments srv?

Does this time frame seem far more logical (and truthful) than yours?


You do seem to be ignoring this srv...any reason?

8/18/2015 1:38:37 PM Navarro, CA  
higgy51
Over 2,000 Posts (3,533)
Navarro, CA
61, joined Nov. 2012


Quote from srv63:
.

One ingredient you failed to mention shill which was also found in the dust. Care to tell us how barium was found as well?


Please do show what barium and thermate have in common.



higgy51 - Navarro, CA