Loads of evidence has already been posted here so if your too lazy to look it up, tough shit shill

You bring up one very good point higgy and we will let FUNWITHMUSIC post a model of how the towers were constructed INCLUDING THE MAIN CENTER COLUMNS because guess what,you shills and your official gooberment story are going to be taking another MASSIVE blow to where you will be eating your shit for dinner AGAIN. Whenever your ready FUN, i'm ready to spoon feed these morons their own shit and maybe they will learn something from it

In the 'Big Lie' scenario, they must keep repeating their talking points, no matter what.



Things like, "A conspiracy that big could never stay secret", competely ignores dozens of whistle blowers who have come forward.



Endless requests for evidence, followed by dismissals or ignorance. Then rinse and repeat

Class5, your assertion that fires brought down these buildings is laughable. Explosions and the flashes from sequential explosions WERE observed and noted by rescue workers and by those who survived the ordeal, and the eye witness testamony is documented on videos, and the explosions can also be seen and heard on the videos of the falling towers, together with plumbs from the explosions. And buildings that fall down on their own, do not crumble down into ruins at near free fall speeds INTO THEIR OWN FOOTPRINTS. Preplaced demolition charges and careful planning are required to achieve that. But you just dismiss that too. The Government’s official cover story is so full of holes and contradictions that it is laughable, but you just dismiss that too. I hope they are paying you enough to make a total fool out of yourself.

Progrocknic, oh ye Atheistic Godless Liberal, you say: “I want to see evidence. I can't believe in something without evidence. That's why I'm not religious.” Well, what in the Hell do you want, do you want molten metal from the Towers to be delivered to your kitchen table so that you can examine it? Get real. Atheists, including yourself, have no proof that God does not exist, for it is not possible to prove an absolute negative, they take that on faith and faith alone. Atheism IS their faith, their religion. And you are also taking the Government’s cover story on faith, and faith alone. You see, Progrocknic, for you, it’s all faith, and it depends on whom you choose to believe. Do you believe those eyewitnesses who heard and saw the explosions and who saw the molten metal pouring from the towers and the molten metal in the basement of the ruins of the towers, or are you going to believe the Government?

Let me underline that, you take the nonexistence of God on faith, because no evidence or proof exists that he does not exist, and you take the Government’s cover story for 9-11 on faith, despite the fact that the Government’s story is full of holes and contradictions, and despite the fact that the Government has an official policy of “disinformation”: “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false” (William Casey, CIA director 1981-1987, from first staff meeting in 1981)”. Those who control our Government today are Satanists, is that why you, an avowed atheist, are siding with them? Are you and they comrades? You are awfully selective about whom you believe. Concerning 9-11, you refuse to believe eye-witnesses, but you believe instead a Government that has an avowed policy of lying to its own people. And you view yourself as “rational”? Get real.

Louie

If it's not rust shill, then you better tell me what it is. If it looks like a duck, then it is a duck

Tell your mommy that she needs to let you out of the basement more often so that you can go outside in the shithole you live in to be able to see some of the junky assed cars with bare metal that is rusting or else have her take your dumb f**kin a** to the nearest auto junk yard to see what rust looks like on a TIN car then your dumb a** might not need to question me on what the hell rust on tin looks like you moron. While your at it in that junk yard, go look at what gray primer looks like on bare tin as well because THE DAMN NUMBERS PAINTED ON THAT FUSELAGE ARE PAINTED WITH GRAY PRIMER DUMB F**K WHILE THE REST OF THAT FUSELAGE IS UNTREATED RUSTING METAL TIN!!!!!

tragic

Note the passenger windows...
======================================
Ahhhhhhhh....if your gonna plant a piece of a fuselage that looks like it came from a jumbo jet------ you better plant one that has windows, dont ya think?

In the 'Big Lie' scenario, they must keep repeating their talking points, no matter what.

Things like, "A conspiracy that big could never stay secret", competely ignores dozens of whistle blowers who have come forward.

Endless requests for evidence, followed by dismissals or ignorance. Then rinse and repeat

Class5, your assertion that fires brought down these buildings is laughable.

Explosions and the flashes from sequential explosions WERE observed and noted by rescue workers and by those who survived the ordeal

and the eye witness testamony is documented on videos

and the explosions can also be seen and heard on the videos of the falling towers, together with plumbs from the explosions.

And buildings that fall down on their own, do not crumble down into ruins at near free fall speeds INTO THEIR OWN FOOTPRINTS.

Preplaced demolition charges and careful planning are required to achieve that.

But you just dismiss that too.

The Government’s official cover story is so full of holes and contradictions that it is laughable, but you just dismiss that too.

I hope they are paying you enough to make a total fool out of yourself.

I'm just waiting for one single person to present a PLAUSIBLE conspiracy.

Not some over imaginative fabrication based on a lack of trust, but an actual plausible scenario.

If you mention there were no planes, you are doing nothing but making conspiracy theorists look less legitimate.

When something DOES actually point to a conspiracy, no one will be believed because they will just be lumped in with the crazy 9/11 truthers that think there were explosives and holograms and missiles.

Essentially, they are tarnishing the name of anyone who does question the governments action.

It would make more sense that srv is a paid shill by the government.

But of course the idea of a paid shill posting on a dating sites dying forum is that of a complete lunatic anyway.

Is it immoral to be forced to pay for things you don't want?

But unfortunately, the legal process requires evidence for a prima facie case to initiate proceedings.

9/11 truth cannot produce it. If they could, an investigation would follow, but they can't.

It is that simple. No matter what is said on forums and CT sites, it always comes down to this.

There is a lack of evidence.

Quote from progrocknic:
What in the world does this have to do with 9/11?



*************************************



You said you'd like to see an investigation, but don't want to pay for it. I'm curious if you're arguing the arbitrary, or if you're making a principled argument about self ownership.



Moral relativism

Your so full of SHIT shill. There is a mountain of facts that CANNOT be explained but yet there is no investigation and NEVER has been. Why wouldn't there ever be a legitimate investigation, because then the puppetmasters all the way down the line would be exposed and the public would not be so forgiving. I for one would refuse to pay to keep the pieces of shit incarcerated and damn sure would vote against hanging their murdering asses. Make them feed off of each other then starve to death the survivors.

I for one as a taxpayer, FULLY support and am prepared to pay my part of reconstructing a full size, exact replica of one of the trade towers UNDER EXTREME SECURITY MEASURES, fill every f**kin void of that building with furniture then ram it with a jumbo jet FULL OF FUEL and watch what really happens afterwards. No DOUBTS IN MY MIND that the building NEVER FALLS.NO DOUBTS that the main columns NEVER WEAKEN. We can also see reality that ATLEAST HALF of all the plane will fall to the streets below instead of vanishing inside the building. NOT ONE PIECE of the plane will go thru the building.

Another option: ram the pentacon with a REAL 767 FULL OF FUEL and then compare the damage to the gooberment photos.GUARANTEED the damage is NOTHING like the gooberment photos.GUARANTEED BOTH aircraft wings will be outside on the pentacon lawn as well as ATLEAST ONE ENGINE, HALF of the FUSELAGE and 100% of the TAIL SECTION and not to mention atleast 50 PASSENGER SEATS.

THIS you TROLL would be PROOF that we are RIGHT and your DUMB A** is WRONG

No, your wrong shill. Na is just exposing the unpaid shill for what he really is

If all goes well, we wont need a miserable lawyer, D*ckheaded FOOL

You will. Don't you know how this works? Please try to debate on a higher level than stupid remarks like that. That just makes you look a moron.

You take your suspicions to a lawyer. This would be done as a collective possibly arranged by Gage. You present the evidence and you connect it to perps with evidence. This is then brought before a hearing to ascertain whether it is a viable case. Then if deemed worthy, it will be set in train.

Gage hasn't been able to fulfil the first step and he can't say he doesn't have the funding because the Skeptics society exposed how much he rakes in per annum from 9/11 truth.

If 9/11 truth has the evidence, it has the means to set a new investigation in train.

Fourteen years later, still nothing but JAQing off (just asking questions) from the cheaper seats.

Your so full of SHIT shill. There is a mountain of facts that CANNOT be explained but yet there is no investigation and NEVER has been. Why wouldn't there ever be a legitimate investigation, because then the puppetmasters all the way down the line would be exposed and the public would not be so forgiving. I for one would refuse to pay to keep the pieces of shit incarcerated and damn sure would vote against hanging their murdering asses. Make them feed off of each other then starve to death the survivors.

I for one as a taxpayer, FULLY support and am prepared to pay my part of reconstructing a full size, exact replica of one of the trade towers UNDER EXTREME SECURITY MEASURES, fill every f**kin void of that building with furniture then ram it with a jumbo jet FULL OF FUEL and watch what really happens afterwards. No DOUBTS IN MY MIND that the building NEVER FALLS.NO DOUBTS that the main columns NEVER WEAKEN. We can also see reality that ATLEAST HALF of all the plane will fall to the streets below instead of vanishing inside the building. NOT ONE PIECE of the plane will go thru the building.

Another option: ram the pentacon with a REAL 767 FULL OF FUEL and then compare the damage to the gooberment photos.GUARANTEED the damage is NOTHING like the gooberment photos.GUARANTEED BOTH aircraft wings will be outside on the pentacon lawn as well as ATLEAST ONE ENGINE, HALF of the FUSELAGE and 100% of the TAIL SECTION and not to mention atleast 50 PASSENGER SEATS.

THIS you TROLL would be PROOF that we are RIGHT and your DUMB A** is WRONG

While I agree not all of what transpired on 911 can be thoroughly explained, despite whatever anomalies do exist, there is no mountain of facts that support your theory of an inside job. All your doing is repeating the same old claims lashed out by the circle of self-referencing truther sites who's agenda, in many cases, is much wider than understanding the events surrounding 911.

Whats needed to make your theory even begin to be plausible, is a yet another independent review of the 911 events which would require eyewitnesses, videos, photos, timelines, sketches, technical details, expert opinions, forensic analysis of wreckage and debris, with a final conclusion that ties all these elements together almost perfectly. Certainly NOT a re-enactment in which you know damn well will never happen. Your assertions are not proof of anything, much less worthy of a new 911 investigation.

While I agree not all of what transpired on 911 can be thoroughly explained, despite whatever anomalies do exist, there is no mountain of facts that support your theory of an inside job. All your doing is repeating the same old claims lashed out by the circle of self-referencing truther sites who's agenda, in many cases, is much wider than understanding the events surrounding 911.

Whats needed to make your theory even begin to be plausible, is a yet another independent review of the 911 events which would require eyewitnesses, videos, photos, timelines, sketches, technical details, expert opinions, forensic analysis of wreckage and debris, with a final conclusion that ties all these elements together almost perfectly. Certainly NOT a re-enactment in which you know damn well will never happen. Your assertions are not proof of anything, much less worthy of a new 911 investigation.

Whats sad, is that these nut jobs will most likely end up using the next tragic event as a means to continue pushing propaganda without the least bit of respect for any victims.

Well, given the amount of respect you've shown here, i'd say its quite obvious you'd lack it anywhere else.

Think for yourself if you want respect