Baytown, TX

HERES WHAT REALLY HAPPENED!

You nay sayers..If you bothered to watch these videos..you could see what we tell you is the truth...THERE IS NO WAY TO DENY IT...THE VIDEO PROVES WHAT WE SAY IS TRUE..AND THE NEWS VIDEOS SHOWN ON TV..WERE FAKES..

BOTTOM LINE..DUE TO EVIDENCE..PIXEL CLOUDS..DISAPPEARING WINGS..NOSE OUT OF BUILDING .ETC.....THERE WERE NO PLANES..

notice when plane #2 supposedly hit the 2nd WTC building...no debris fell from the building at the impact site..THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE! There would be SOMETHING that would have fell from the building on impact..But instead..the aluminum plane sliced through hard steel just like butter.

IT takes alot of faith to belive the Gov Manufactured c*ck and bull story

KEEPING IN MIND WHO IS IN CONTROL OF THE US GOV TODAY.

THE ZIONIST JEWS OF ISRA-HELL..and this was the second attack against our nation by the Jews..

THE FIRST WAS THE USS LIBERTY...where Jew President LYNDON JOHNSON told the Jews to SINK THAT GOD DAMNED SHIP TO THE BOTTOM OF THE OCEAN...

and USEFUL IDIOT..Poppa McShame's job was to hide the truth from the American people...Now you can understand why son of Poppa McShame..is so well taken care of by the Zionist Jews in the gov...proving that there is too many Jews in our gov..

No, he has done no such thing. You wouldn't understand the conflict of logic in his post. If you can't see it, you won't be able to.

You have done nothing...to prove your position in this issue.

Shut up with your crap for once. I am still waiting on you people to address the evidence I posted 20-30 pages ago. You ignore what I post then abuse me for not posting evidence. Get out of here with that line of mendacity!

..NOTHING..nor have your Commie-rads.

He makes sense to me...THE NOSE WAS NOT RECOVERED..BECASUE THERE WAS NO PLANE

Of course it would make sense to you, it is ridiculous and illogical-perfect faire for one of your threads.

7/12/2015 7:45:54 AM
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from higgy51: Iron, steel, tin they all rust, so the engine was made of IRON was it? INFORMATION SITE WHERE YOU FOUND IT WAS MADE OF TIN? We are not talking about the jet engine right now shill but i think you already knew that. Just another lame attempt to change subject/ cause confusion but it didn't work Meet singles at DateHookup.dating, we're 100% free! Join now!
7/12/2015 8:06:09 AM	Baytown, TX
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from higgy51: We can't keep facts straight? Ummmm...then how did 57 (apart from being an idiot) get the wrong plane...oh, just like you did!! Taxi Drivers wife in IN the FBI was she? Facts straight. Fuselage made of tin? Facts straight. Shanksville crash site already there? - Facts straight Need I REALLY go on srv? SITE FOR YOUR INFORMATION THAT THE FUSELAGE WAS MADE OF TIN IS WHERE???????????? I didn't get the plane wrong shill, you clowns did. We both know damn well why you have repeatedly tried to change the facts of the plane being a Boeing 767-200 to a 767-300ER. Nice try but no cigar for you shills. And speaking of idiots, with all of the EVIDENCE and PROOF along with EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY that paint ALLOT CLEARER picture of what really happened on 9/11 than the gooberments official story but yet ALL of you shills still want to dispute it, that is what clearly defines who the real idiots are. After you morons are successful (which i wont hold my breath) in debunking the RUSTY TIN fuselage found on top of WTC5, then and only then am i going to move forward to bury your asses in the shanksville hoax as well as the pentacon hoax
7/12/2015 8:25:21 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from srv63: We are not talking about the jet engine right now shill but i think you already knew that. Just another lame attempt to change subject/ cause confusion but it didn't work Correct, we weren't discussing the engine, I was confusing you for the other idiot, 57. Delete ENGINE and insert FUSELAGE. What site did you get your information that the fuselage was made of TIN? Simple question, requires and even simpler answer....go for it!
7/12/2015 8:31:18 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from srv63: After you morons are successful (which i wont hold my breath) in debunking the RUSTY TIN fuselage found on top of WTC5, then and only then am i going to move forward to bury your asses in the shanksville hoax as well as the pentacon hoax We don't have to debunk you, we ALL KNOW ANY FUSELAGE is made of aluminum. We have the proof of that. YOU must prove to us that it was made of tin. ALL you need to do is provide the site that gives any information of it being tin, because i tell you know srv, no amount of searching online comes up with anything remotely to do with a tin fuselage...not one snippet. You see, it is very hard for anyone to debunk a total fallacy or a figment of a simpletons fantasy. Oh by the way, what plane did hit the Towers? You said it wasn't a commercial one, so what was it? (I have asked this before, but once again, you avoided it like the plague....not to mention you have debunked 57 because he said no planes hit the Towers NO PLANES...so well done.)
7/12/2015 8:45:58 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from srv63: then am i going to move forward to bury your asses in the shanksville hoax as well as the pentacon hoax You are a boring bastard with these idle and stupid threats, ones that you cannot and will not keep, we all know that....you are a bore, full stop.
7/12/2015 11:50:27 AM	Baytown, TX
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from higgy51: You are a boring bastard with these idle and stupid threats, ones that you cannot and will not keep, we all know that....you are a bore, full stop. What's wrong? Poor shills panties getting in a knot?
7/12/2015 12:05:37 PM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from srv63: What's wrong? Poor shills panties getting in a knot? Not a bit, not at all in fact. Just fed up of you dancing around like a headless chicken and avoiding simple questions posed to you, questions like: Please provide a link to any website that indicates the fuselage was made of tin, can you do that very simple task? You see, if you cannot provide such a link or any information, then it is very difficult to debunk your stupid claim...and want to know why? You cannot debunk something that doesn't exist. Your claim it is made of tin is purely in your head and in no-one else's, no-one has ever made a statement like you have because there is no evidence of anyone ever saying it, except you of course. Of course, we know you don't have an iota of evidence don't we?
7/12/2015 12:27:30 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	higgy Please provide a link to any website that indicates the fuselage was made of tin, can you do that very simple task? ==================================================== Please provide a link that proves a plane can penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building and the nose of the plane can come out the other side. A link where the left wing of the alleged plane disappears and the wing also can be seen behind a building that is far away from the tower...you know where the left wing should have been seen in FRONT of the building way behind the south tower??? Since you cant provide any links that show that........we can assume that no real airplane was flown into the south tower, right??
7/12/2015 12:51:15 PM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from 57channels: Please provide a link that proves a plane can penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building and the nose of the plane can come out the other side. A link where the left wing of the alleged plane disappears and the wing also can be seen behind a building that is far away from the tower...you know where the left wing should have been seen in FRONT of the building way behind the south tower??? Since you cant provide any links that show that........we can assume that no real airplane was flown into the south tower, right?? Please provide a link that shows the walls were made of steel reinforced concrete. The 'nose' wasn't a nose, it was smoke and debris. No idea what your third request was about, sorry. You do know that a straw can penetrate a potato don't you? You do know that a piece of 4 by 2 can penetrate a house made of bricks don't you?
7/12/2015 1:33:39 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	higgy The 'nose' wasn't a nose, it was smoke and debris. ==================================================== I know 80% of the people here in Merica are dumb as a box of rocks.....but I doubt more than 3% believe it was smoke and debri
7/12/2015 1:40:55 PM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from 57channels: I know 80% of the people here in Merica are dumb as a box of rocks.....but I doubt more than 3% believe it was smoke and debri Okay, you being one of the 97% that don't believe it was smoke and debris, maybe you can inform us 3% what it was? This is while you look for a link to prove the WTC outer was constructed of steel reinforced concrete.
7/12/2015 5:22:25 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: After you morons are successful (which i wont hold my breath) in debunking the RUSTY TIN fuselage found on top of WTC5, then and only then am i going to move forward to bury your asses in the shanksville hoax as well as the pentacon hoax Yeah, yeah, we've been hearing this shit for 30 or more pages. You have yet to provide evidence for any of your claims, and I doubt you can bury anyone's ass, as you clearly don't have a f**king clue. How's the proof of the rust going Dipshit? We've only been waiting for god knows how long for you to actually do something instead of just running your mouth. I won't hold my breath for any supporting evidence from you because I know 9/11 truth isn't all that interested in evidence.
7/12/2015 5:23:12 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: What's wrong? Poor shills panties getting in a knot? No, he's just calling you on your delaying tactics.
7/12/2015 5:34:15 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: Please provide a link that proves a plane can penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building and the nose of the plane can come out the other side. Steel reinforced concrete building? You are not talking about the WTC. Since you cant provide any links that show that........we can assume that no real airplane was flown into the south tower, right?? Non Sequitur. Your assumption does not follow and is illogical, because the evidence is contradictory.
7/12/2015 7:41:08 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: I know 80% of the people here in Merica are dumb as a box of rocks.....but I doubt more than 3% believe it was smoke and debri How would you know? This post is typical of most of your posts: Fanciful speculation without any supporting evidence, or more colloquially, just bullshit.
7/12/2015 7:53:08 PM	Baytown, TX
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	A little much needed humor...
7/12/2015 8:09:55 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	OKYDOKY So the nose out was smoke and debri that mysteriously outlined the nose of a plane??? So what explains the left wing dissappearing. We have all seen it, haven't we? The ONLY thing I can think of is a CGI glitch of some sort by the media. What say you kids?? Im not gonna look up the video for you
7/12/2015 8:57:07 PM	Baytown, TX
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from 57channels: OKYDOKY So the nose out was smoke and debri that mysteriously outlined the nose of a plane??? So what explains the left wing dissappearing. We have all seen it, haven't we? The ONLY thing I can think of is a CGI glitch of some sort by the media. What say you kids?? Im not gonna look up the video for you Of course your not. So instead, i've posted a link showing the impact at a few different angles. Linky... http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.de/2014/05/the-nose-out-fallacy.html Quote from article > "It's impossible that the nose could have survived intact. What's seen exiting the tower is obviously not a CGI animation. It's real. The ejection and it's shadow are consistently visible from numerous angles, including those from live broadcasts. When ALL the video evidence is considered, it is very clear that the alleged "nose out" is nothing but a debris cloud exploding out of the north-east corner of the tower (including engine and landing gear), the same kind of debris cloud seen exploding out of the east face."
7/12/2015 9:02:12 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	What nose? And the Purdue Simulation: https://youtu.be/4FfAYIaH-wE Nope, no ejecta that resembles the nose of an aircraft.
7/12/2015 9:03:25 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from tragicparrot: Of course your not. So instead, i've posted a link showing the impact at a few different angles. Linky... http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.de/2014/05/the-nose-out-fallacy.html Quote from article > "It's impossible that the nose could have survived intact. What's seen exiting the tower is obviously not a CGI animation. It's real. The ejection and it's shadow are consistently visible from numerous angles, including those from live broadcasts. When ALL the video evidence is considered, it is very clear that the alleged "nose out" is nothing but a debris cloud exploding out of the north-east corner of the tower (including engine and landing gear), the same kind of debris cloud seen exploding out of the east face." Well done! That confirms that the 'nose out' story is a myth.
7/12/2015 9:04:15 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from tragicparrot: A little much needed humor... I know people who actually think like this.
7/13/2015 1:44:23 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from 57channels: OKYDOKY So the nose out was smoke and debri that mysteriously outlined the nose of a plane??? So what explains the left wing dissappearing. We have all seen it, haven't we? The ONLY thing I can think of is a CGI glitch of some sort by the media. What say you kids?? Im not gonna look up the video for you Yes, it was merely smoke and debris as Tragic so eloquently says in his post above and as his link proves, you just need to look at the various info within his link. That is you problem, you THINK. What disappearing wing are you talking about now? The one that disappeared into the Towers? Oh 57, any luck on posting PROOF that the WTC was made of steel reinforced concrete yet? Typical of you CT nutcases, you post shit and get it all wrong don't you? Then when asked to provide your proof, you and srv dance and hide and try to ignore in the vain hope it will go away. Well 57, it will NOT go away. Not until you ADMIT you got it wrong and cannot prove it was made of steel reinforced concrete because you looked at the following and thought (told you, thinking for you is so dangerous)..you thought "Oh shit, they got my a** again" The most noticeable change in the modern high-rise construction is a trend to using more steel and shaping lightweight steel into tubes, curves, and angles to increase its load bearing capability. The WTC has tubular steel bearing walls, fluted corrugated steel flooring and bent bar steel truss floor supports. To a modern high rise building designer steel framing is economical and concrete is a costly material. For a high-rise structural frame: columns, girders, floors and walls, steel provides greater strength per pound than concrete. Concrete is heavy. Concrete creates excessive weight in the structure of a building. Architects, designers , and builders all know if you remove concrete from a structure you have a building that weights less. So if you create a lighter building you can use columns, girders and beams of smaller dimensions, or better yet you can use the same size steel framing and build a taller structure. In News York City where space is limited you must build high. The trend over the past half-century is to create lightweight high buildings. To do this you use thin steel bent bar truss construction instead of solid steel beams. To do this you use hollow tube steel bearing walls, and curved sheet steel (corrugated) under floors. To do this you eliminate as much concrete from the structure as you can and replace it with steel. Lightweight construction means economy. It means building more with less. If you reduce the structure’s mass you can build cheaper and builder higher. Unfortunately unprotected steel warps, melts, sags and collapses when heated to normal fire temperatures about 1100 to 1200 degrees F.
7/13/2015 9:58:20 AM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	higgy the two big towers were blown to smithereens they were pulverized they were dusticized- there was dust all over Manhattan and all over the state of New York probably for days or weeks what the hell do you think that dust was made??? from steel? I think it was concrete higgy don't you?????id bet the house all that dust came from concrete
7/13/2015 10:27:26 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from 57channels: higgy the two big towers were blown to smithereens they were pulverized they were dusticized- there was dust all over Manhattan and all over the state of New York probably for days or weeks what the hell do you think that dust was made??? from steel? I think it was concrete higgy don't you?????id bet the house all that dust came from concrete Yes, some of it probably was concrete, but that didn't come from the walls you stupid man, it came from the FLOORS. Sigh, you don't really know what you are talking about do you? Why don't you at least RESEARCH shit before you post that shit? Come on 57, I (WE) are still waiting for your link to show the walls were made of steel reinforced concrete - concrete. Tell you what, why don't you just admit that AGAIN, you screwed up?
7/13/2015 11:22:00 AM	Baytown, TX
funwithmusic Chapel Hill, NC 60, joined Feb. 2007 online now!	http://911review.org/Wget/investigate911.batcave.net/nose.html HERE YA GO..A FRAME BY FRAME OF THE INFAMOUS NOSE IN NOSE OUT VIDEO..created by corrupt news agencies..controlled by the ZOG.. 9/11 WTC South tower nose cone flight 175 The Nose or cckpit of the plane seems to have stayed intact all the way through the building and bursting out of the other side. AFTER exiting the building it seems to explode in a fiery WHITE HOT explosion. The fuel tanks of a Boeing 767 are on the outer part of the wings and about 90 ft apart from each other. The plane came in at an angle and the wings should have sheared off. Remember, the wings would have had to transgress the continuous concrete and steel floors, causing the main explosion to happen inside the building, and not exiting as shown here. boeing 767 specs... www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/sitemap.html AS SHOWN ON FOX NEWS* SQUIBS...PREWIRED FOR DEMOLITION CONTINUED
7/13/2015 11:25:26 AM	Baytown, TX
funwithmusic Chapel Hill, NC 60, joined Feb. 2007 online now!	CONTINUED THESE YOU TUBES KNOCK IT OUT OF THE PARK...THERE IS NO WAY TO BELIEVE THE CCK AND BULL STORY OF THE ZIONIST GOV WE HAVE TODAY.. Please dont say anything till you watch them...Let us think you have half a brain..ok? THE PLANES WERE ONLY ON ZIONIST CONTROLLED MEDIA FOOTAGE..Those faceless others do not count..as they are not substantiated by one lick of proof...And the fact that CNN told the one man hes not to talk to anyone about his supposed video...smells like SANDY HOOK LYING AND STINKER. THEY MUST THINK WERE ABSOLUTELY STUPID..and would fall for such lies.. YOUTUBE:* Nose in Nose out..and see the right wing dissappear BEFORE hitting the building....and the left wing shrinks..NOTICE THE PIXEL CLOUDS AROUND THE PLANE..AS IT BEGINS TO DISINTEGRATE BEFORE HITTING THE BUILDING..Also notice the NOSE OF THE PLANE is still perfectly intact after hitting this steel building..IMPOSSIBLE!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SevMXy6uYUA =============================================== YOUTUBE Proof No Planes Hit Twin Towers. 9/11 Videos Are Fake! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5Dl5jIdtdk This is not an amature video...IT WAS SHOWN ALL AROUND THE WORLD..OVER AND OVER..AGAIN YEAR AFTER YEAR..IS A "CGI RENDERING"..A FAKE.PUT OUT BY JEWISH CONTROLLED NEWS MEDIA..YOu can see clearly on this video used in the news..that the plane . NOTICE THE WING GOES BEHIND A BUILDING A HALF A MILE AWAY FROM WTC..
7/13/2015 11:27:55 AM	Baytown, TX
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from funwithmusic: http://911review.org/Wget/investigate911.batcave.net/nose.html HERE YA GO..A FRAME BY FRAME OF THE INFAMOUS NOSE IN NOSE OUT VIDEO..created by corrupt news agencies..controlled by the ZOG.. 9/11 WTC South tower nose cone flight 175 The Nose or cckpit of the plane seems to have stayed intact all the way through the building and bursting out of the other side. AFTER exiting the building it seems to explode in a fiery WHITE HOT explosion. The fuel tanks of a Boeing 767 are on the outer part of the wings and about 90 ft apart from each other. The plane came in at an angle and the wings should have sheared off. Remember, the wings would have had to transgress the continuous concrete and steel floors, causing the main explosion to happen inside the building, and not exiting as shown here. boeing 767 specs... www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/sitemap.html AS SHOWN ON FOX NEWS* SQUIBS...PREWIRED FOR DEMOLITION CONTINUED Here ya go. Proof your nose out theory is ridiculous. Linky... http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.de/2014/05/the-nose-out-fallacy.html Quote from article > "It's impossible that the nose could have survived intact. What's seen exiting the tower is obviously not a CGI animation. It's real. The ejection and it's shadow are consistently visible from numerous angles, including those from live broadcasts. When ALL the video evidence is considered, it is very clear that the alleged "nose out" is nothing but a debris cloud exploding out of the north-east corner of the tower (including engine and landing gear), the same kind of debris cloud seen exploding out of the east face."
7/13/2015 1:15:13 PM	Baytown, TX
tragicparrot Painesville, OH 57, joined Mar. 2014	Quote from funwithmusic: The Nose or c*ckpit of the plane seems to have stayed intact all the way through the building and bursting out of the other side. AFTER exiting the building it seems to explode in a fiery WHITE HOT explosion. The fuel tanks of a Boeing 767 are on the outer part of the wings and about 90 ft apart from each other. The plane came in at an angle and the wings should have sheared off. Remember, the wings would have had to transgress the continuous concrete and steel floors, causing the main explosion to happen inside the building, and not exiting as shown here. boeing 767 specs... www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/sitemap.htmlw Funwithmusic. The link you provided > http://www.boeing.com/commercial/767/ has nothing to do with 911 let alone lend support to your "nose out" theory. Also, continually posting discredited links is not evidence. Neither is posting grainy photo's from anti-semic websites such as "Veterans Today". Veterans Today is known to be a source for conspiracists Jim Fetzer and Gordon Duff who's ridiculous theories tried to blame the Burgas bus bombing in Bulgaria and the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting attacks on Israel. How about posting something more convincing rather than the same old "conspiracies without evidence" crap.
7/13/2015 4:10:19 PM	Baytown, TX
funwithmusic Chapel Hill, NC 60, joined Feb. 2007 online now!	Quote from higgy51: Yes, some of it probably was concrete, but that didn't come from the walls you stupid man, it came from the FLOORS. Sigh, you don't really know what you are talking about do you? Why don't you at least RESEARCH shit before you post that shit? Come on 57, I (WE) are still waiting for your link to show the walls were made of steel reinforced concrete - concrete. Tell you what, why don't you just admit that AGAIN, you screwed up? Obviously you have no clue how things are built THERE IS NOT ONE SLAB OF CONCRETE IN AMERICAS buildings or roads....THAT IS NOT REINFORCED WITH REBAR.... For you sqiggy...thats steel netting..so to speak.. Perhaps its you that should research SHIT before YOU post.. I bet your embarassed now..HERE I AM A WOMAN..AND EVEN I KNOW THIS..AND IVE NEVER BUILT ONE BUILDING IN MY LIFE BUT I READ ALOT...SO IM SMARTER THAN YOU I SUPPOSE [Edited 7/13/2015 4:12:08 PM ]
7/13/2015 4:52:01 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from funwithmusic: http://911review.org/Wget/investigate911.batcave.net/nose.html HERE YA GO..A FRAME BY FRAME OF THE INFAMOUS NOSE IN NOSE OUT VIDEO..created by corrupt news agencies..controlled by the ZOG.. 9/11 WTC South tower nose cone flight 175 The Nose or cckpit of the plane seems to have stayed intact all the way through the building and bursting out of the other side. AFTER exiting the building it seems to explode in a fiery WHITE HOT explosion. The fuel tanks of a Boeing 767 are on the outer part of the wings and about 90 ft apart from each other. The plane came in at an angle and the wings should have sheared off. Remember, the wings would have had to transgress the continuous concrete and steel floors, causing the main explosion to happen inside the building, and not exiting as shown here. boeing 767 specs... www.boeing.com/commercial/767family/sitemap.html AS SHOWN ON FOX NEWS* I still can't identify it as the nose conclusively as it just looks like a part of the impact explosion. The Squibs idea is ridiculous and long debunked. They are merely the result of air pressure as the building loses its integrity. Sorry, try again. Here's the Purdue University simulation for your perusal: https://youtu.be/4FfAYIaH-wE This will give you some idea of how the plane and the building interacted at the time of the impact. Note the nose doesn't survive. [Edited 7/13/2015 4:55:20 PM ]
7/13/2015 4:54:28 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	tragic When ALL the video evidence is considered, it is very clear that the alleged "nose out" is nothing but a debris cloud exploding out of the north-east corner of the tower (including engine and landing gear), the same kind of debris cloud seen exploding out of the east face." ========================================================== That's the best you can do???THAT'S THE BEST YOU CAN DO??? Debri cloud????????You best sciddaddle and get out of here. The other 2 kiddies are probly laughing their asses off at what you just blasphemed??? But......they'll be here soon to back you up Debri cloud???????? Debri cloud of what?? Smoke, nitrogen, hydrogen, plutonium, uranium?? What say you there boy???
7/13/2015 4:56:51 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: tragic When ALL the video evidence is considered, it is very clear that the alleged "nose out" is nothing but a debris cloud exploding out of the north-east corner of the tower (including engine and landing gear), the same kind of debris cloud seen exploding out of the east face." ========================================================== That's the best you can do???THAT'S THE BEST YOU CAN DO??? Debri cloud????????You best sciddaddle and get out of here. The other 2 kiddies are probly laughing their asses off at what you just blasphemed??? But......they'll be here soon to back you up Debri cloud???????? Debri cloud of what?? Smoke, nitrogen, hydrogen, plutonium, uranium?? What say you there boy??? That's what it looks like. You guys are trying to make it into something which is illogical and a figment of your overactive imagination. Why wasn't the 'nose' recovered in the cleanup? Why wasn't it found on the street like the engine? if it survived the impact where did it go? You people, as usual, haven't thought this through. [Edited 7/13/2015 4:59:08 PM ]
7/13/2015 5:03:16 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	higgy Yes, some of it probably was concrete, but that didn't come from the walls you stupid man, it came from the FLOORS. ================================================ Oh, making up stuff I never said about no walls or floors. Keep up da good work. BTW...you a Bear or Packer fan??? So...some of it was concrete huh.........thanks for the tip, want to fill us in on how much of it was concrete?? 20, 50, 100 million tons of it???? Some of the steel did get blown to dust though, and some of it got throw some 600 feet by mini or micro nukes I'm guessing or thermate or whatever. Oh..I shouldnt have said the last line as now your job......YOUR JOB WILL BE TO TRY AND MAKE IT LOOK LIKE I DONT KNOW NUTTIN. Time to twist words and overhype meaningless drivel. Thats your job.
7/13/2015 5:08:08 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	class Why wasn't the 'nose' recovered in the cleanup? Why wasn't it found on the street like the engine? if it survived the impact where did it go? ================================================ The nose wasnt recovered because there was no real plane. There was no planes. Fake planes, fake videos, fake eyewitnesses, fake you tubes, fake news...live from the BBC " WE have news that the Soloman Bros. building or WTC #7 has just collapsed [ and there is WTCF # 7 right f**king there in the background while the robot says it just collapsed] A B or C rated movie that will eventually kill millions
7/13/2015 5:11:12 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: Some of the steel did get blown to dust though, and some of it got throw some 600 feet by mini or micro nukes I'm guessing or thermate or whatever. Wow, today's gem. Steel got blown to dust? How? No evidence, just the fanciful musings of an insane woman (Judy Wood). Mini micro-nukes? Puleeese!!!!! That is just a foolish thought and it demonstrates your gullibility. Or thermite? Thermite is not an explosive so it cannot create ejecta. This post I replied to must be the dumbest of this entire thread. Congratulations.
7/13/2015 5:13:50 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	Fun Obviously you have no clue how things are built THERE IS NOT ONE SLAB OF CONCRETE IN AMERICAS buildings or roads....THAT IS NOT REINFORCED WITH REBAR.... For you sqiggy...thats steel netting..so to speak.. Perhaps its you that should research SHIT before YOU post.. I bet your embarassed now..HERE I AM A WOMAN..AND EVEN I KNOW THIS..AND IVE NEVER BUILT ONE BUILDING IN MY LIFE ===================================================== It is very refreshing and uplifting to always see you corner the shills and make them look like the [ patsie gooberment Jewish hacks they are ] Keep it up...we are here to try and wake up any newbies, and here to learn. Never knew the FBI unloaded that fake engine on Murray street from the van you posted. Just more proof
7/13/2015 5:28:49 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: class Why wasn't the 'nose' recovered in the cleanup? Why wasn't it found on the street like the engine? if it survived the impact where did it go? ================================================ The nose wasnt recovered because there was no real plane. There was no planes. Fake planes, fake videos, fake eyewitnesses... But you maintain the nose came out of the building. Do you see the confusion here? What are you trying to demonstrate here? Instead of just insulting people, how about you state your hypothesis? You seem to be promoting conflicting hypotheses, and that is irrational.
7/13/2015 5:40:51 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	class Computer glitch...its quite evident the video CGI people didn't get it correct on timing with the media [CNN] They f**ked up and it was on the live feed from CNN that mourning.
7/13/2015 5:57:06 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from 57channels: class Computer glitch...its quite evident the video CGI people didn't get it correct on timing with the media But there is no evidence of such. Why do you adopt this position without evidence? The following steps are now a part of the process of producing this hypothesis. a). It needs to be confirmed that the footage is actually the product of CGI. This hasn't been done. b). Who performed this task? c). How do we account for the dead, the airlines insurance payouts, and the wreckage? These factors all need to be addressed before the no-plane hypothesis can be considered.
7/13/2015 5:58:12 PM	Baytown, TX
funwithmusic Chapel Hill, NC 60, joined Feb. 2007 online now!	Quote from tragicparrot: Here ya go. Proof your nose out theory is ridiculous. Linky... http://debunkingnoplanes.blogspot.de/2014/05/the-nose-out-fallacy.html Quote from article > "It's impossible that the nose could have survived intact. What's seen exiting the tower is obviously not a CGI animation. It's real. The ejection and it's shadow are consistently visible from numerous angles, including those from live broadcasts. When ALL the video evidence is considered, it is very clear that the alleged "nose out" is nothing but a debris cloud exploding out of the north-east corner of the tower (including engine and landing gear), the same kind of debris cloud seen exploding out of the east face." Where does the quote from the article stop..and the opinion of your mental midget pro Zionist Sayanim begin? Perhaps here:.....When all evidence is considered.......blah blah blah and more bullshit blah blah blah.. LOOK AGAIN..IVE NEVER SEEN A DEBRIS CLOUD THAT LOOKED LIKE A PERFECT CYLINDER.. REMEMBER...THE ONLY VIDEOS SHOWING THIS IMAGE...ARE THE CORRUPTE JEWISH MEDIA NEWS AGENCIES...WHO HAVE AN AGENDA TO HIDE THE FACT THE ISRA-HELLI MOSSAD JEWS DID THIS TO THE WTC...in order to get FREE DEBRIS HAULING PAID BY THE TAX PAYER...since the buildings were filled with Asbestos and red flagged ALSO..in order to get WARS FOR ISRA-HELL...OBVIOUSLY You can fool the liberals..but you cannot fool us..with your propaganda bullshit.
7/13/2015 6:02:38 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from funwithmusic: Where does the quote from the article stop..and the opinion of your mental midget pro Zionist Sayanim begin? Perhaps here:.....When all evidence is considered.......blah blah blah and more bullshit blah blah blah.. LOOK AGAIN..IVE NEVER SEEN A DEBRIS CLOUD THAT LOOKED LIKE A PERFECT CYLINDER.. REMEMBER...THE ONLY VIDEOS SHOWING THIS IMAGE...ARE THE CORRUPTE JEWISH MEDIA NEWS AGENCIES...WHO HAVE AN AGENDA TO HIDE THE FACT THE ISRA-HELLI MOSSAD JEWS DID THIS TO THE WTC...in order to get FREE DEBRIS HAULING PAID BY THE TAX PAYER...since the buildings were filled with Asbestos and red flagged ALSO..in order to get WARS FOR ISRA-HELL...OBVIOUSLY You can fool the liberals..but you cannot fool us..with your propaganda bullshit. So, you cannot counter the evidence produced by Tragic? Please note where he stated ALL the video evidence. This is important. [Edited 7/13/2015 6:03:33 PM ]
7/13/2015 6:09:51 PM	Baytown, TX
funwithmusic Chapel Hill, NC 60, joined Feb. 2007 online now!	Quote from 57channels: Fun Obviously you have no clue how things are built THERE IS NOT ONE SLAB OF CONCRETE IN AMERICAS buildings or roads....THAT IS NOT REINFORCED WITH REBAR.... For you sqiggy...thats steel netting..so to speak.. Perhaps its you that should research SHIT before YOU post.. I bet your embarassed now..HERE I AM A WOMAN..AND EVEN I KNOW THIS..AND IVE NEVER BUILT ONE BUILDING IN MY LIFE ===================================================== Channels: It is very refreshing and uplifting to always see you corner the shills and make them look like the [ patsie gooberment Jewish hacks they are ] Keep it up...we are here to try and wake up any newbies, and here to learn. Never knew the FBI unloaded that fake engine on Murray street from the van you posted. Just more proof MUSIC: Thank you! I just could not beleive he would set himself up like that.. DID YOU NOTICE..HE IGNORED MY COMMENT ABOUT RE-BAR..AND CEMENT...Obviously hes never built anything...EVEN YOUR SIDEWALK HAS STEEL RE-BAR IN IT...GEESSHH.. ======================================================================= Quote from 57channels: class Why wasn't the 'nose' recovered in the cleanup? Why wasn't it found on the street like the engine? if it survived the impact where did it go? The nose wasnt recovered because there was no real plane. There was no planes. Fake planes, fake videos, fake eyewitnesses... CLASSLESS 5 YRoLD But you maintain the nose came out of the building. Do you see the confusion here? What are you trying to demonstrate here? Instead of just insulting people, how about you state your hypothesis? You seem to be promoting conflicting hypotheses, and that is irrational. MUSIC: HUH? WHAT IS SO CONFUSING ABOUT WHAT HE HAS SAID? How has he insulted you in the least? He stated a fact...and proved it to be so... You have done nothing...to prove your position in this issue...NOTHING..nor have your Commie-rads. He makes sense to me...THE NOSE WAS NOT RECOVERED..BECASUE THERE WAS NO PLANE ITS A FAKE VIDEO...CREATED IN A NEWS ROOM using modern day technologies.....like the fake interview with Gay Boy Anderson Pooper and grieving Jewess Kol Nidre liar mother Veronique Pozner...aka..Veronique Haller....aka Agent in Switzerland.. Your confused..because you always try to make comments about our posts...but never reading them...or watching the videos....etc. DID YOU EVER WATCH THAT VIDEO...OR GO TO THAT SITE? EVER?????????? You cant know anything..by pulling it out of thin air...You actually have to do some work...and some research as we have done..and make a friggen effort..Your lazy.. Perhaps you should go back to your Sayanim School in ISrahell I posted about the otherday...and learn to be a better Jewish Sayanim...
7/13/2015 6:22:36 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from funwithmusic: [quote Quote from 57channels: class Why wasn't the 'nose' recovered in the cleanup? Why wasn't it found on the street like the engine? if it survived the impact where did it go? The nose wasnt recovered because there was no real plane. There was no planes. Fake planes, fake videos, fake eyewitnesses... CLASSLESS 5 YRoLD But you maintain the nose came out of the building. Do you see the confusion here? What are you trying to demonstrate here? Instead of just insulting people, how about you state your hypothesis? You seem to be promoting conflicting hypotheses, and that is irrational. MUSIC: HUH? WHAT IS SO CONFUSING ABOUT WHAT HE HAS SAID? How has he insulted you in the least? He stated a fact...and proved it to be so...
7/13/2015 7:12:27 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	Fun ITS A FAKE VIDEO...CREATED IN A NEWS ROOM using modern day technologies.....like the fake interview with Gay Boy Anderson Pooper and grieving Jewess Kol Nidre liar mother Veronique Pozner...aka..Veronique Haller....aka Agent in Switzerland.. ============================================================ Is that Veronica gal one of the actresses that played the role of the greiving mother at Sandy Hook?? I've heard of Gerald Pozner...the worm that claims Oswald shot JFK.
7/13/2015 7:28:19 PM	Baytown, TX
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: How would you know? This post is typical of most of your posts: Fanciful speculation without any supporting evidence, or more colloquially, just bullshit. Expensive fancy education to learn big words to impress but yet this shill's common sense still amounts to dumber than a bag or rocks
7/13/2015 7:31:47 PM	Baytown, TX
progrocknic Mount Arlington, NJ 31, joined Dec. 2012	Quote from srv63: Expensive fancy education to learn big words to impress but yet this shill's common sense still amounts to dumber than a bag or rocks Those are big words to you? No wonder you're a truther.
7/13/2015 7:32:49 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: Expensive fancy education to learn big words to impress but yet this shill's common sense still amounts to dumber than a bag or rocks How's the evidence for rust going? Found anything yet to support your silly stories. No? I didn't think so. All you've got are lame a** personal attacks, and that is merely a diversion away from your responsibilities to the debate. Come on, you've a lot of work to do in order to catch up. You fool no-one with your playground tactics.
7/13/2015 7:34:58 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from progrocknic: Those are big words to you? No wonder you're a truther. He must have the vocabulary of a 10 year old if they're to be considered 'big' (whatever that fking means). Look, he's just slinging shit to avoid his obligations to the thread. I don't take this Fkwit, or the other two seriously at all. 'Fanciful' is a big word? 'Colloquial' he probably had to look up because he's a moron, but 'fanciful'? [Edited 7/13/2015 7:36:30 PM ]
7/13/2015 9:13:42 PM	Baytown, TX
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from class5: I still can't identify it as the nose conclusively as it just looks like a part of the impact explosion. The Squibs idea is ridiculous and long debunked. They are merely the result of air pressure as the building loses its integrity. Sorry, try again. Here's the Purdue University simulation for your perusal: https://youtu.be/4FfAYIaH-wE This will give you some idea of how the plane and the building interacted at the time of the impact. Note the nose doesn't survive. Quote: I still can't identify it as the nose conclusively as it just looks like a part of the impact explosion. As fun has so graciously shown, during the whole time of this explosion from the side of the building, frame by frame shows the natural flow of movement of smoke involved in the explosion but yet the whole time, the "combined debris and smoke" shooting out of the exit hole of the rear corner of the building keeps its perfect smooth uniform shape. AND to make your claim even MORE ridiculous, is the fact that wind direction and speed at that altitude that day would have made it IMPOSSIBLE for that FAKED PROTRUDING CCKPIT to keep its smooth form for that number of frames!!!!! Quote:* The Squibs idea is ridiculous and long debunked. They are merely the result of air pressure as the building loses its integrity. IF what you say is correct about air pressure blowing the windows out floor by floor as each floor is collapsing onto each other,why then are the windows being blown out two and three stories below the progressive destruction before any pressure had a chance to build? Why wouldn't almost all of this "pressure" be able to be released thru the 46 ELEVATOR SHAFTS that were in the core center of each tower and then exhausted thru the lobby windows which were already blown out by explosives? Quote: Here's the Purdue University simulation for your perusal: Quote: This will give you some idea of how the plane and the building interacted at the time of the impact. Note the nose doesn't survive. There are plenty of graphic animations on the internet showing that a flimsy cckpit made of aluminum alloys ESPECIALLY the 9 FOOT long NOSE CONE made of resin composites* (which cant even survive a bird striking it), CANNOT even make it thru the entrance at the front of the building and DAMN SURE WILL NOT make it thru the building and then exit the back of the building BUT as seeing is believing, i think FUN shows here with PROOF frame by frame a CLEAR IMAGE OF A C*CKPIT exiting the rear corner of the building
7/14/2015 1:57:40 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from funwithmusic: Obviously you have no clue how things are built THERE IS NOT ONE SLAB OF CONCRETE IN AMERICAS buildings or roads....THAT IS NOT REINFORCED WITH REBAR.... For you sqiggy...thats steel netting..so to speak.. Perhaps its you that should research SHIT before YOU post.. I bet your embarassed now..HERE I AM A WOMAN..AND EVEN I KNOW THIS..AND IVE NEVER BUILT ONE BUILDING IN MY LIFE BUT I READ ALOT...SO IM SMARTER THAN YOU I SUPPOSE In your dreams you are smarter. We are NOT talking about ROADS you stupid woman, we are talking about the WTC and if you had read and researched, you would have seen that the ONLY concrete was in the floors, as I had already stated to that fool 57 when I confirmed that some of the dust was concrete. You are so simple, it is unbelievable. I asked 57 for a link to show me that the WALLS were made of reinforced concrete and guess what? Yes, he couldn't and then YOU come in with both feet, up to your neck in shit because you had no clue what we were discussing in the first instance! The WTC Exterior 'walls' were NOT made of steel and reinforced concrete. RESEARCH it.
7/14/2015 2:05:24 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from 57channels: Oh, making up stuff I never said about no walls or floors. Keep up da good work. BTW...you a Bear or Packer fan??? So...some of it was concrete huh.........thanks for the tip, want to fill us in on how much of it was concrete?? 20, 50, 100 million tons of it???? Some of the steel did get blown to dust though, and some of it got throw some 600 feet by mini or micro nukes I'm guessing or thermate or whatever. Oh..I shouldnt have said the last line as now your job......YOUR JOB WILL BE TO TRY AND MAKE IT LOOK LIKE I DONT KNOW NUTTIN. Time to twist words and overhype meaningless drivel. Thats your job. You didn't say walls or floors that is correct 57, you only said this: Quote from 57channels: Please provide a link that proves a plane can penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building ...... Now, that would indicate to anyone with a normal brain that you state/think/suggest that the building was constructed (made out of) steel reinforced concrete. Now, if you are now suggesting that you didn't mean that, then I have nothing to prove to you have I? I wasn't trying to twist your words, I was merely using logic and intelligence to assume that when you said the above, you would be talking about the exterior construction otherwise how would I be able to prove that a plane could penetrate such? Okay 57, VERY SIMPLE question... WHAT WAS THE OUTER WALLS OF THE WTC MADE OF?
7/14/2015 2:21:10 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from funwithmusic: DID YOU NOTICE..HE IGNORED MY COMMENT ABOUT RE-BAR..AND CEMENT...Obviously hes never built anything...EVEN YOUR SIDEWALK HAS STEEL RE-BAR IN IT...GEESSHH.. Sadly, some of us work unusual hours because some of us have very sick Fathers to look after, However, you will notice that I did reply to your stupid post - it was just a shame that you jumped in with both feet without looking first. You see Miss shitforbrains, 57 was trying to tell me that the exterior was made of steel reinforced concrete and how could a plane crash straight through it. I asked him to prove that construction, and guess what? No, he couldn't (typical of CT nutcases like him, srv and yourself). If he cannot prove that the exterior -where the plane crashed into - is made of steel reinforced concrete, then his question to me is a mute one and one that is to be ignored and laughed at because of it's stupidity. So come on 57, can you prove the constructional part of where the plane hit was made of steel reinforced concrete? NOW, if you didn't mean the actual exterior where the plane hit, then why on earth did you post this stupid request? Quote from 57channels: Please provide a link that proves a plane can penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building ...... Hey Fun? Maybe you can help out your fellow nutcase on this point! Or will you just slink away again once you understand that you have been made a fool of by another CT Nutcase, AGAIN. [Edited 7/14/2015 2:22:34 AM ]
7/14/2015 2:25:40 AM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from higgy51: Not a bit, not at all in fact. Just fed up of you dancing around like a headless chicken and avoiding simple questions posed to you, questions like: Please provide a link to any website that indicates the fuselage was made of tin, can you do that very simple task? You see, if you cannot provide such a link or any information, then it is very difficult to debunk your stupid claim...and want to know why? You cannot debunk something that doesn't exist. Your claim it is made of tin is purely in your head and in no-one else's, no-one has ever made a statement like you have because there is no evidence of anyone ever saying it, except you of course. Of course, we know you don't have an iota of evidence don't we? Hey SRV? Still nothing from you? What a shame, you have to run and hide from the egg splattered all over your face, tons and tons of egg on your face isn't there? Keep ducking and diving, keep dancing away from the questions, like the coward that you are.
7/14/2015 10:53:40 AM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	higgy I'm talking to my phone so it may not come out real well. I never said one word about the outer walls of the big towers. I said how could a plane penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building the entire building Go in one side and come out the other you have 148 perimeter steel columns great big steel columns and 47 inner core columns you think that can go through that and have the nose come out the other side are you kiddin?
7/14/2015 3:12:38 PM	Baytown, TX
higgy51 Navarro, CA 61, joined Nov. 2012	Quote from 57channels: higgy I'm talking to my phone so it may not come out real well. I never said one word about the outer walls of the big towers. I said how could a plane penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building the entire building Go in one side and come out the other you have 148 perimeter steel columns great big steel columns and 47 inner core columns you think that can go through that and have the nose come out the other side are you kiddin? No 57, stop lying and dancing, you said this: "Please provide a link that proves a plane can penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building ...." You never said anything after that...certainly nothing about the nose cone, so stop your lying ass. I asked you to PROVE the steel reinforced concrete and once again, you dance away.
7/14/2015 3:55:35 PM	Baytown, TX
57channels Bettendorf, IA 64, joined May. 2008	higgy No 57, stop lying and dancing, you said this: "Please provide a link that proves a plane can penetrate a steel reinforced concrete building ...." You never said anything after that...certainly nothing about the nose cone, so stop your lying ass. I asked you to PROVE the steel reinforced concrete and once again, you dance away ========================================== Sorry about your dad and stuff, hope he is not in any pain....but you dont know what your talking about or insinuating. There were no REAL planes flown on 9-11. Need I repeat that. A real plane could never ever penetrate the entire WTC building and have the nose of the plane come out the other side....impossible. The nose we all see is a computer graphic image of the fake nose of the fake plane that overlapped for a split second. GOT IT???? Up your meds now
7/14/2015 4:57:24 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from higgy51: Hey Fun? Maybe you can help out your fellow nutcase on this point! Or will you just slink away again once you understand that you have been made a fool of by another CT Nutcase, AGAIN. This argument from their side is just dumb. The WTC was not a building made of steel reinforced concrete, the WTC was a long-span, steel framed open plan design and any attempts to try and misrepresent the reality is just deceitful. To shift the goal posts and use the flooring to support their claim was just further evidence of the dishonest tactics employed by the these bottom feeders.
7/14/2015 5:05:52 PM	Baytown, TX
srv63 Baytown, TX 52, joined Jul. 2012	Quote from higgy51: Hey SRV? Still nothing from you? What a shame, you have to run and hide from the egg splattered all over your face, tons and tons of egg on your face isn't there? Keep ducking and diving, keep dancing away from the questions, like the coward that you are. ` One thing at a time shill. 57channels might be a nice guy and actually care about your loved ones but i for one couldn't care less. Do you want to know why, well i will tell you anyway. I for one see you and the rest of the shills on this site as traitors and sell outs therefore you and your own deserve any shit that comes your way for selling your souls for a paycheck. Now, i unlike yourself have REAL issues in REAL life to deal with, much more important than trying to sway the stupidity and dead against truth mentality of a piece of shit paid government shill. As far as 57's statement, there IS a steel reinforced mesh inside the concrete that makes up EVERY SINGLE FLOOR in both towers so he is not wrong about his statement of steel reinforced concrete in both towers so YOU need to do more research.
7/14/2015 5:11:50 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: Quote: I still can't identify it as the nose conclusively as it just looks like a part of the impact explosion. As fun has so graciously shown, during the whole time of this explosion from the side of the building, frame by frame shows the natural flow of movement of smoke involved in the explosion but yet the whole time, the "combined debris and smoke" shooting out of the exit hole of the rear corner of the building keeps its perfect smooth uniform shape. AND to make your claim even MORE ridiculous, is the fact that wind direction and speed at that altitude that day would have made it IMPOSSIBLE for that FAKED PROTRUDING CCKPIT to keep its smooth form for that number of frames!!!!! But as you keep failing to understand, other footage doesn't show this. Only one piece of footage can support your claim in any way and that is owing to the angle it was taken. Clearly it is just smoke from the impact explosion.You can't identify it as the nose, and this line of so-called reasoning from your side is pathetic. It reminds of some dckhead who keeps claiming rust without any evidence. IF what you say is correct about air pressure blowing the windows out floor by floor as each floor is collapsing onto each other,why then are the windows being blown out two and three stories below the progressive destruction before any pressure had a chance to build? Well, this is simple. You're suggesting it was a demolition charge. Then prove it. That was easy. Why wouldn't almost all of this "pressure" be able to be released thru the 46 ELEVATOR SHAFTS that were in the core center of each tower and then exhausted thru the lobby windows which were already blown out by explosives? Too many logical fallacies in that mess to bother with. Ok, let's give you a lesson here. If you note in the collapse sequence the hat truss collapsed earlier than the exterior. That's a fact, do you agree? If so, that means the interior failed slightly earlier, now in Funwithdrugs' pic can you tell me what part of a second we are looking at in the collapse sequence? No. THINK before you post! There are plenty of graphic animations on the internet showing that a flimsy cckpit made of aluminum alloys ESPECIALLY the 9 FOOT long NOSE CONE made of resin composites* (which cant even survive a bird striking it), CANNOT even make it thru the entrance at the front of the building and DAMN SURE WILL NOT make it thru the building and then exit the back of the building BUT as seeing is believing, i think FUN shows here with PROOF frame by frame a CLEAR IMAGE OF A CCKPIT exiting the rear corner of the building. Yes, but all that stupidity rests upon a ridiculous assumption that you or anyone else cannot prove. One has to assume it is the nose before one adopts her hypothesis, and that is what is known as confirmation bias in her, and your case. How's that evidence for rust going F*kwit?
7/14/2015 5:19:02 PM	Baytown, TX
class5 Queensland Australia 52, joined Jan. 2014	Quote from srv63: ` One thing at a time shill. 57channels might be a nice guy and actually care about your loved ones but i for one couldn't care less. Do you want to know why, well i will tell you anyway. I for one see you and the rest of the shills on this site as traitors and sell outs therefore you and your own deserve any shit that comes your way for selling your souls for a paycheck. Now, i unlike yourself have REAL issues in REAL life to deal with, much more important than trying to sway the stupidity and dead against truth mentality of a piece of shit paid government shill. As far as 57's statement, there IS a steel reinforced mesh inside the concrete that makes up EVERY SINGLE FLOOR in both towers so he is not wrong about his statement of steel reinforced concrete in both towers so YOU need to do more research. Yes, but he shifted the goal posts. How perspicacious of you to not acknowledge his deceit. You fool no-one with these evasions.

srv63 - Baytown, TX

rubratings com

hookup spots cincinnati

rubratings com

hookup spots cincinnati

WTC truth ATTACKS on Pentagon. Destroying the EVIDENCE against them!

Baytown, TX