Louie. Comparing a solid tree to a mostly hollow building structure is about the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard of. These are the sort of comments that lead me to believe your better off being ignored. Seriously.

Hey Parrot, how about you tell us the width and depth as well as the THICKNESS
of the 47 main center support beams at the center of each tower

Yes, please do look at his statement below will you, please do try to read it: I have HIGHLIGHTED his comments where needed, just to help you!

Sometime before 2008, during an interview with Loose Change filmmakers Jason Bermas and Dylan Avery, Jennings elaborated on the explosions he heard and felt in Building 7, saying (at the 5:45 mark):
“All this time, I’m hearing all kinds of explosions. All this time I’m hearing explosions. And I’m thinking that maybe it’s the uh, buses around me that were on fire, the cars that were on fire, but, I don’t see no [gesturing] you know, but I'm still hearing these explosions. When they [the rescuers] finally got to us, and they took us down, to what, what they, they, uh, called the lobby, because I asked them when we got down there I said, ‘Where are we?’ He said ‘This was the lobby.’ And I said, ‘You gotta be kidding me.’ Total ruins. Total ruins. Now keep in mind when I came in there, the lobby had nice escalators, it was a huge lobby. And for me to see what I saw, was unbelievable.”

"When they got to the 6th floor an explosion below blew them off and the landing beneath them gave way. They had to retreat to the 8th floor. It is important to emphasize that in every interview that he gave Jennings insisted that it was an explosion and that the explosion took place below them. "

One has to wonder what it is among all the questions truthers/trools like srv63 relentlessly post that could possibly lead to proof of a conspiracy? As for srv63, until which time he or she learns to communicate clearly, I find it no longer necessary to entertain his questions because they are nothing but a waste of time.

Far as i'm concerned, there is no way the Bush administration could have pulled off such a huge false flag operation without at least screwing up something. SOLID PROOF on Youtube is undeniable!!! Linky...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UYQfzVOH9E

Stanley Hilton Lawsuit

Stanley G. Hilton has filed a class action lawsuit in Federal court in Northern California against against high officials in the current Bush administration (including the federal government, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Mueller, Tenet, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft), for complicity in aiding and abetting and facilitating the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks.

His suit contends, and we strongly concur, that the defendants did so in order to launch unconstitutional aggressive war against the sovereign states of Afghanistan and Iraq, declare political opponents "enemy combatants," suspend the Constitution indefinitely, etc., all for sordid political ends which subvert the very system of laws and Constitution the defendants have sworn to uphold in their offices.

http://www.911review.org/Wiki/StanleyHiltonLawsuit.shtml

higgy

Well done 57, that law suit goes back just a few years, 11 in total!

You do understand it was filed in 2004 don't you?
=====================================================
Yeah.....I know that. The point is : I listed this is because Mr. Hilton [ Bobe Doles former COS ] was representing 400 family members who lost loved ones on 9-11. Got it??? Now go ahead and rip or criticize these 400 family members like you kiddie fkn cats have done with Richard Gage, Jim Fetzer, Morgan Reynolds, John Lear, pilots, veterans, scholars, architects, engineers, veterans for TRUTH.

GO AHEAD AND CALL THE 400 FAMILY MEMBER : CONSPIRACY KOOKS " LIKE YOU HAVE EVERYBODY ELSE THAT WANTS THE FKN TRUTH ABOUT 9-11

juma

Furthermore, the accusation was that various gov. officials failed to act to prevent 9/11, not planned and executed the nefarious plot u imagine.
==========================================================
Im not gonna look it all up now. easy for the feds to cook the books or change alot of the data after 14 years. 400 family members or whatever. Im sure its alot more than 14 family members.

Failed to act to prevent??? That's treason and mass murder anyway. The truther's know the feds planned it, did it, and covered it up [ with the Mossads help ] So..... your little excuse means jack diddly squat.

One has to wonder what it is among all the questions truthers/trools like srv63 relentlessly post that could possibly lead to proof of a conspiracy? As for srv63, until which time he or she learns to communicate clearly, I find it no longer necessary to entertain his questions because they are nothing but a waste of time.

cl-ASS

I blocked the idiot because I am sick of his drivel and stupidity. It's quite pleasant without that troll.
=====================================================
[Evil & lies blocks Good & truth]. Very good comparison would be Jim Miegs blocking Kevin Barrett or Morgan Reynolds.

Please provide a reference to which veterans your referring to. And their opinions or at least an interview regarding 911. Simply stating that "some veterans" did not get brainwashed leaves nothing for anyone to leave an opinion on.

[snip]......What is your opinion of the vets that want a new or real investigation into 9-11??

Who did that fancy pants, snobby education with no common sense panty waste noclass block 57channels? Wittle ole me?

Some b*tches can't take the truth, especially when the truth destroys their narrative. That's one dumb shill down and 2 1/2 to go

Perhaps you can help resolve who the veterans are 57channels is referring to?

Did someone say there were no explosions or that there was no controlled demolition? There's a pretty big difference between those things. But of course if you think we invaded Iraq first after 9/11 and not Afghanistan..... Well..... This concept might be difficult to grasp.

I be seen a lot of 9/11 videos. I hear a lot of things crashing, and popping, and blowing up. I have yet to hear any evidence of a controlled demolition. I've been to a few of those. The sounds are pretty unmistakable. Not a single video capture anything like that.

So tell us more 57channels and srv63 about the veterans who are asking for a new or real investigation into 911? Who are they, and in what website or blog post have you found their inquiries? And about this demolition expert srv63 your referring to, who is he?

I be seen a lot of 9/11 videos. I hear a lot of things crashing, and popping, and blowing up. I have yet to hear any evidence of a controlled demolition. I've been to a few of those. The sounds are pretty unmistakable. Not a single video capture anything like that.

Excellent point Sn63. And the four higgs, or at least some of them, did say there were no explosions. But I do not have the time to wade back through 200 pages to find the quotes. First they denied there were no explosions, and then, when it was shown to them that there were numerous successive explosions, they denied that the explosions were unrelated to controlled demolition. And yet they never admitted that they were wrong about these being no explosions.

They went through this same song and dance about there being no molten metal. When it was shown that there was molten metal, and that is was seen pouring down from the outside (which they first denied), they insisted it was not molten steel.

And when it was shown to them that some of the steel beams were cut diagonally, which had to have been a deliberate cut, they insisted that it was the cleanup crew that cut the beams.

And when it was pointed out to them that the order to "pull it" was given and recorded on the third tower, which they had denied, they then redefined the term. And so it goes. Do you see a pattern here?

They will have to be dragged kicking and screaming to the truth. But as long as they have a vested interest in the government story, they will not cry uncle. They do not understand that when they defend government lies, they make themselves a party to those Government lies, and when they defend the Government brutally murdering all those people, they make themselves a party to their murders.

None of the four higges would ever be able to work in a field that required careful thought and careful research, be it a police detective trying to solve a murder, or a doctor trying to diagnose a disease, or an electronic technician trying to trouble shoot a problem, or a physicist trying to explain an unexplained anomaly, or whatever. They would fail at all these occupations if they treated them in the same way they are treating this. Louie

And if Class5's posts here were ever shown to his customers, he would lose all his customers. Customers do not like dishonest and incompetent business men.

Excellent point Sn63. And the four higgs, or at least some of them, did say there were no explosions. But I do not have the time to wade back through 200 pages to find the quotes.

Jowenko never had any experience with demolishing skyscrapers. His entire opinion was based upon what WTC7 looked like when it collapsed. Furthermore, he had never offered up any evidence or written analysis that lent support to a controlled demolition. Unless you can prove otherwise, your Youtube video has consequently been ignored.

Jowenko initially was asked leading questions, and his original interview was edited by 9/11 truth to paint him as a supporter. He has since published a statement disassociating himself from 9/11 truth. I'll try to find it and post it for you, as it's on ISF somewhere and you know that might take a while to find.

Found one thread here...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=64261&highlight=Danny+Jowenko

Unfortunately, many of the associated links to Danny Jowenko's original interview have long since been expired. Not surprizing, since AE911Truth's only hope is to capitalize on anything but his original interview.

To the Truthers as well as the shills,

Since i never could get any of these spineless, deceptive shills to answer one of my questions about the WIDTH, DEPTH and THICKNESS of the FORTY SEVEN (47) MAIN COLUMNS that are the MAIN SUPPORTS in the center of EACH twin tower, i took the liberty of posting a clear view of one (url is posted below) being cut at ground zero. Compare the size of one of these columns compared to one of the guys cutting it and ask yourselves, would it be possible for jet fuel which is not a damn bit hotter burning than kerosene or diesel fuel, be able to get hot enough to weaken one of these beams, much less most of them? As you can clearly see, EACH COLUMNS metal thickness is a minimum OF 4 INCHES THICK

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGddnJlJpJQ start video at 2:42

Only in a fairy tale could diesel fuel get that hot